Near-Perfect Jewish controlled “false opposition”

shill, liar, agent provocateur for the Jews

shill, liar, agent provocateur for the Jews

If you ever doubted Alex Jones reputation on the “Jewish Question”, then this should be enough to convince you that he and his ilk  are working for the other side, the evil “new world order”/Illuminati side, the other side of the fence where Mossad operative-killers lurk to take you out of the picture, for good, or, make certain that you and your family wind up in a FEMA camp.

Jones is EXPOSED for what he is – a shill, a liar, an agent provocateur for the Jews to keep you in your controlled chair at home.  While in this discussion lets further clarify that it’s not Zionists or Zionist Jews perpetrating this evil, it’s JEWS, period.  Remember that Orthodox Jews also adhere to the Talmud, as well.  They are taught the same religious poison as Zionist Jews, that all Goyim are worth less than cattle and that our extermination is one of their ultimate goals.

Forward to everyone you know, or, don’t know, post it on a free webpage and in community forums.  Make certain that Jones is routed out from his comfortable easy chair in the alternative media.

Whitewraithe~

Jason Bermas and Alex Jones respond to the ‘Jewish Question’ following Bermas’ incident calling for Jew Critics to Die

Jones and Bermas’ attempt at “damage control” only further exposes them as complete Jewish/Zionist-controlled false opposition. The caller from California calls back to Bermas’ radio show, and Bermas actually defends his statement that Jew critics should die (no joke), saying it’s “not true” that Jews control Hollywood and the mainstream media, and that anyone who says so is just a “jew hater.” Alex Jones then jumps in to defend Bermas, with his usual rant about how the “jew haters” are “mentally ill scum”…etc, etc.

Then Jones and Bermas go on to pontificate about how they really do “support free speech” (sure…while they call for the death of critics of the Jewish power structure, and slander and smear them as “jew haters”, “anti-semites”, “losers”, “mentally ill”, “scum”, etc, etc). Meanwhile, ‘champions of freedom of speech’ Jones and Bermas refuse to let the caller from California exercise his freedom of speech and make his point, repeatedly cutting him off and shouting over him.

Part 1:

Part 2:

We’re All Anti-Semites Now

June 26, 2009

By Henry Makow Ph.D.

gagged for telling the truth

gagged for telling the truth

Anti-Semitism used to refer to a racial prejudice against Jews. Now “hate” is a codeword for something else: Opposition to Zionism, a political program that many Jews find repugnant.

By equating “hate” with opposition to Zionism, organized Jewry has given everyone permission to be an anti-Semite.

In Soviet Russia, anti-Semitism was considered “counter revolutionary” and severely punished. Similarly, anti-Semitism is now a political crime in the West because it runs counter to the New World Order.

For example, a Winnipeg journalist, Leslie Hughes, was dropped as a Liberal candidate in the 2008 election for remarking on Israeli foreknowledge of the 9-11 attack in an 2003 article.  She taught courses on tolerance and had no feelings of hostility against Jews whatsoever.  Her crime was political. (She is suing the Jewish groups.)

My writing warns Jews they have been used to advance the central banker’s plan for world government dictatorship. I emphasize that every significant nation, religion and organization is being used in the same way. Nonetheless, the Canadian Jewish Congress accuses me of “hatred against Jews” and wants to suppress my writing on this subject.  The absurdity of accusing the son of holocaust survivors of anti-Semitism only underlines the true political nature of my crime.

YOU ARE AN ANTI SEMITE IF …

Rev. Ted Pike extrapolates from the 2004 US “Global Anti-Semitism Review Act”  to define the kind of political activity that is being criminalized. (“The Real Motive Behind
‘Dept Of Global Anti-Semitism'”)

1. Any assertion “that the Jewish community controls government, the media, international business and the financial world” is anti-Semitic.

2. “Strong anti-Israel sentiment” is anti-Semitic.

3. “Virulent criticism” of Israel’s leaders, past or present, is anti-Semitic.

4. Criticism of the Jewish religion or its religious leaders or literature (especially the Talmud and Kabbalah) is anti-Semitic.

5. Criticism of the U.S. government and Congress for being under undue influence by the Jewish-Zionist community (including AIPAC) is anti-Semitic.

6. Criticism of the Jewish-Zionist community for promoting globalism (the “New World Order”) is anti-Semitic.

7. Blaming Jewish leaders and their followers for inciting the Roman crucifixion of Christ is anti-Semitic.

8. Diminishing the “six million” figure of holocaust victims is anti-Semitic.

9. Calling Israel a “racist” state is anti-Semitic.

10. Asserting that a “Zionist Conspiracy” exists is anti-Semitic.

11. Claiming that Jews and their leaders created the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia is anti-Semitic.

12. Making “derogatory statements about Jewish persons” is anti-Semitic.

13. Denying the right of mostly atheist Jews to re-occupy Palestine is anti-Semitic.

14. Alleging that Mossad was behind the 9/11 attack is anti-Semitic.

Essentially if you believe in truth and justice, you’re an anti-Semite. If you believe in free speech, free inquiry and the democratic process, you’re an anti-Semite. If you oppose tyranny, corruption and murder, you’re an anti-Semite.

If you’re not an anti-Semite, you’re uninformed at best, and a sell-out (“vendu”) at worst.

Ultimately, the New World Order will turn 90% of the world’s population and at least 50% of Jews into anti-Semites. Is this the real agenda? To divert blame away from the central banksters and their non-Jewish Masonic minions?

THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN

by Andrew Carrington Hitchcock

by Andrew Carrington Hitchcock

Andrew Hitchcock’s “The Synagogue of Satan” is a compelling chronology of the Jewish role in the central banker’s Satanic conspiracy a.k.a The New World Order. Together with my Illuminati, it provides as an excellent introduction to the subject.

The only knock is that Hitchcock does not provide references. For example, he lifts the above list from the Internet without giving  credit to Rev. Pike. Nevertheless Hitchcock’s sources can be verified online.

I was impressed by the amount of new information and insight I found. Hitchcock explains how the “nationalization” of the Bank of England in 1946 was a sleight-of-hand. He provides new information on the art of money creation. He lucidly explains the significance of the Noahide Laws.

You read this book with growing fury at the scale of ruthlessness, criminality and chutzpah of certain Jews. These Jews are not God’s Chosen people, but Satan’s, a matter that should be of concern to the others who are guilty mostly of naivety, complacency, conformity, cowardice, opportunism and even some complicity. (The same can be said of Americans who support US war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan with their tax dollars. Neither can hold their head up.)

Hitchcock quotes Werner Sombart who says that from 1820 onward, there was “only one power in Europe, and that is Rothschild.”  He says modern capitalism and Americanism are nothing else but “the Jewish spirit distilled.”  Certainly we must analyze the positive and negative aspects of this spirit, weighing material prosperity against spiritual, cultural and political bankruptcy. We must realize that modern Western civilization is essentially Cabalist (Masonic) and Jewish, and increasingly so.

CONCLUSION

Does the New World Order represent the central banker’s need to consolidate power? Is this culmination of a Jewish agenda, or a more general satanic agenda? I suggest that these three agendas are complementary and overlapping.

Our world is the product of a long-term Satanic conspiracy to overthrow Christian civilization and institute a veiled dictatorship using the mass media, education and sophisticated technology. All the scoundrels selling their fellow Americans down the river are put there by the central banking cartel, re. David Rockefeller, US franchisee.

In 1984 George Orwell predicted that reality would be turned upside down. Black would become white according to Big Brother diktat. Now that free speech is a political crime, Orwell’s prophecy has come true.

We must resist the globalists with all our power. A people too stupid or weak to demand their freedom don’t deserve to be free.

They bribe us with our own money now but eventually the bankers will demand payment in blood.

——–

Naomi Klein Calls for Boycott of Israel

Source

The Plot to Exterminate Non-Zionist Jews

Israel is a Big Lie

Part of the Holocaust lie involves claims that people like Dr. Joseph Mengele performed ghastly medical experiments on Jewish victims. There is much evidence to show that these experiments never occurred, but no one disputes that Zionist Jews have had their own “Angels of Death,” and certainly conducted ghastly medical experiments on helpless victims. (Whenever Zionists sense that their crimes are about to be exposed, they accuse everyone else of committing the crime. This is a smokescreen.)

The victims were Sephardic Jews. Their tormentors were Ashkenazi Jews. The scene was Israel.

To recount the nightmarish facts, we must start in the USA …

After the Oppenheimer team manufactured the atomic bomb, many of the Los Alamos scientists, especially Jewish ones, wanted to know how radiation kills people. Countless radiation victims were available for study in Japan, but the Los Alamos scientists found it easier to poison American Goyim and study the lethal results.

The Oppenheimer team secretly commissioned military doctors to inject plutonium granules into unsuspecting men, women, and children in hospital wards across the country. Then the ‘golden needle’ treatments were expanded to include homeless people, inmates in prison, and other parties that had no power to resist. Soon more substances were added, and the number of victims were increased. At a Tennessee prenatal clinic, hundreds of pregnant women were given ‘vitamin cocktails’ laced with radioactive iron. At a school in Massachusetts, scores of disabled children were spoon-fed radioactive isotopes with their morning oatmeal. Those who died underwent special autopsies in which their organs were removed and secretly shipped to Los Alamos for study. Other victims suffered chronic pain and sickness, which they passed to their descendants in the form of birth defects.

You can learn about all this on the Internet by looking up “plutonium experiments.” It was a closely guarded secret until the mid-1990s. The Israeli secret was even more closely guarded.

Eventually the horror in the USA was exposed (but not to the public) and the Oppenheimer team was forced to stop torturing and murdering American Goyim. After that, the team obtained its victims from outside the USA. Israeli Health Minister Yosef Burg used IRGUN terrorists to kidnap 4,500 Yemeni children and ship them in steel cages to the USA for more plutonium experiments.

Also involved in this crime was the 27-year-old Shimon Peres, the main sponsor of Israel’s nuclear weapons program.

The Oppenheimer team at Los Alamos paid large amounts of money to Peres and his terrorist gang to abduct and deliver the Yemeni children for torture and murder. Today this is known as the “Yemeni Babies Affair.” (Everyone else commits “crimes,” but Zionists are merely charged with being involved in “affairs,” such as the “Lavon Affair.”)

Eventually this program also leaked out, and the Oppenheimer team had to move its program to Israel. Oppenheimer himself became disgraced for his involvement in Bolshevism and espionage, but doctors on his team continued their “work.” In Israel, however, the ghastly radiation experiments festered into a program of mass extermination.

In 1951, Dr. Chaim Sheba, the Surgeon General for the Israeli military, replaced Yosef Burg as Israel’s Minister of Health. (Burg later became Deputy Speaker of the Knesset, and the leader of the World Mizraki Movement, a “religious” world Zionist organization.)

Acting as the new “health” minister, Dr. Chaim Sheba flew to America and returned with seven x-ray machines, supplied by Los Alamos. Then he used the machines to blast the heads of Sephardic Jew children with 35,000 times the maximum safe dose of X-rays. At that time, Israel’s entire health budget was 60 million liras per year, but the Zionist-controlled U.S. government paid Israel 300 million liras per year to exterminate the children.

Dr. Sheba and the Israeli government told ordinary technicians that Sephardic Jewish children were being treated for ringworm. The technicians were sent to various schools, and were told to summon all Sephardic children for special “field trips.” Ashkenazi children were told to remain in their seats. Tens of thousands of Sephardic children were loaded onto business, taken to special clinics, and lined up to have their heads shaved. Molten wax was then applied to their scalps to remove all their hair down to the roots, followed by a skin-irritating gel that enhanced the lethal effects of the radiation. Next the children were put in chairs and told to hold a ball between their legs so they would keep still. Then they were blasted with lethal X-rays. Over 100,000 children were given this treatment, and their parents were charged money for this “service.”

About 6,000 children died right away. Those who survived developed cancers that killed thousands of them over time, and are still killing them today. Most of the victims also suffer from epilepsy, amnesia, Alzheimer’s disease, chronic headaches, and psychosis. Their own children are born with birth defects, and also develop cancer. Survivors soon became part of Israel’s perpetually poor and criminal class. (Moroccan Jews who went to France instead of Israel became prosperous and highly educated.)

Today in Israel, everyone notices that Sephardic women in their fifties have large bald spots, which they try to cover with henna and with caps. Ashke-NAZI Israelis long assumed this was a characteristic of Sephardic women, but Sephardic Jew women normally have thick hair.

The dangers of x-rays had been known for over forty years, but X-rays are invisible, and the Israeli technicians believed the ringworm cover-story devised by Dr. Sheba and the Israeli government. The technicians simply pointed machines at the children and flipped a switch. Any technician who realized what was happening was quickly silenced by Prime Minister Ben Gurion and his IRGUN thugs (which included terrorists like future Prime Minister Begin).

It was all part of a Zionist eugenics program to weed out undesirable Jewish elements. (This is why Zionists obsessively claim that Nazis practiced eugenics. Zionists wish to conceal their own eugenics programs.)

Dr. Sheba had connections with the World Zionist Organization in Zurich, a group that was notoriously racist against anyone (including Jews) who is not of Ashkenazi heritage, and which blessed the extermination program. Two of the WZO’s leaders, Nahum Goldmann and Levi Eshkol, spent World War II safely in Zurich, and were outspoken in their desire to have only “white” Jews in Palestine. After the war, Goldman and Eshkol went to New York to become head of the World Jewish Congress, headed by Samuel Bronfman. According to Canadian Jewish writer Mordecai Richler, Samuel Bronfman cut a deal with Canadian Prime Minister Mackenzie King to prevent the immigration of European Jews to Canada. Everyone had to go to Palestine.

Ben Gurion rewarded Chaim Sheba for overseeing the extermination program, and made him head of the Beilionson Hospital in Palestine, and later the Tel HaShomer Hospital. In 1968 Sheba was given the Israel Prize (Israel’s highest prize, awarded to outstanding Zionists). Today Dr. Sheba is a national hero.

Over the years, surviving victims tried to find out who had authorized the tortures, but the Israeli Health Ministry said all records were “lost in a fire.”

The main sponsor of Dr. Sheba’s murders was Prime Minister David Ben Gurion, who hired his son Amos as Minister of Police in order to conceal the crimes as they occurred. Today the international airport in Tel Aviv is named after David Ben Gurion, and a large medical complex is named after Dr. Sheba. (Sheba was a Romanian Jew who died in 1971. The Chaim Sheba Medical Center is the largest medical complex in the Middle East. It is where Ariel Sharon’s body has been kept alive since Sharon had a stroke on January 4, 2006. )

Other people involved in the extermination program were Finance Minister Eliezer Kaplan, plus Foreign Minister Moshe Sharrett (pictures below) plus Labor Minister Golda Meir, who later became Prime Minister. One reason why Golda Meir was allowed to become Prime Minister was that she agreed to keep the secret, just as Condoleeza Rice was rewarded with meteoric advancement because she was willing to keep the secret about 9-11.

Also involved was Levi Eshkol (picture below), the Minister of Settlements whose job was to find homes for Jewish immigrants to Israel, but who made sure that Sephardic Jew immigrant children went to the extermination clinics. Like most of the people involved in this monstrous plot, Eshkol later became Prime Minister, and ordered the attack on Egypt and Syria that touched off the Six-Day War in 1967. He also ordered the attack on the USS Liberty (June 8, 1967.)

The young Shimon Peres was also involved. “Nuclear Peres” we might call him. Today he is a hero to all Zionists. The real Nazis are Ashkenazis.

Because the extermination program brought such huge amounts of money from American taxpayers, Finance Minister Eliezer Kaplan had a hospital named after him in the city of Rehovot.

By the early 1990s, some of the surviving victims tried to sue the Israeli government, but were rebuffed. Israel claimed that radiation was a common means to treat ringworm. (A lie.) Meanwhile Ashkenazi Jews publicly ridiculed and dismissed the victims’ claims.

Eventually the Israeli government quietly paid off some of the survivors in 1995. (Simultaneously the U.S. government quietly paid off surviving American victims of the Los Alamos program). In both countries the payments were only a modest pension, plus financial assistance to provide medical care for the victims’ government-caused ailments. Each victim must hire an attorney to present his or her case in court, which decides compensation on a case-by-case basis.

In 2004, Casque D’or Films and Dimona Productions (a French-Israeli effort) produced a 45-minute documentary about the extermination program. Titled 100,000 Rays (English titled: The Ringworm Children), the film appeared on Israeli television on August 14, 2004, but few Israelis saw it because the Israeli government made sure it was shown at 9:00 pm. At that time, on another channel, most Israelis were watching the highest-rated show of the year: the final of Israel’s Kochav Nola (i.e., A Star Is Born, the Israeli equivalent to the American Idol program shown in the USA. Rupert Murdoch is involved in both.)

The Israeli government learned this concealment trick from its American slaves. When the U.S. or Israeli government is no longer able to cover up its crimes, it allows a documentary to be shown on TV, but only in a time slot when few people are likely to see it. In this way the government claims it is not practicing censorship. The murderous Likud Party used the same trick after it arranged for the assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, who dared to seek peace with Palestinians. An Israeli documentary revealed that Shin Beth (Israeli internal security) was involved, but it was shown at a time when few Israelis saw it.

In 2004, most of the Israelis who did see the TV program 100,000 Rays were outraged that it was shown. They flooded the Israeli TV station (Channel 10) with hate mail, and with demands that everyone at the station be fired.

Today Ashkenazi Israelis continue to persecute “non-white” Jews in Israel. (See our post titled, Ethiopian Blood Not Good Enough for “White” Israelis.) These are the maggots that claim to have the “only Democracy in the Middle East.” These are the vermin that claim to be “victims” while they exterminate everyone else, including Jews who are not Ashkenazi. They suck tax dollars from the American Goyim, and use the money to perpetrate countless acts of unspeakable evil.

Since the Zionist parasites believe in eugenics, we might mention that psychosis seems to be genetically inherent in them, like Type I Gaucher disease (a genetic disorder that occurs in Ashkenazi Jews).

As for the Sephardic Jew victims, our heart aches for them. We consider all children to be angels – including Jewish children. It is only after they have been injected with the venom called Zionism that they are lost.

Then, sadly, they join the ranks of those who will be subject to the next great cleansing, only the next time it will be Ashke-NAZI Zionists.

Source

Burger King: Now Selling Blow Jobs!

I’ll let the ad speak for itself.

 title=

I’m not a prude by any stretch of the imagination but when a mainstream-Americana company like Burger King chooses to put such a degrading image of women out there as a way to peddle their junk food to the public, I feel the need to say something.

They have the right to be tasteless and sexist… And I have the right to tell them they will not see a dime of my money as long as they are using these types vulgar images and tactics in their advertising.

Please feel free to join me in giving them a piece of my mind if you share my disgust.

Burger King Corporation
5505 Blue Lagoon Drive
Miami, Florida 33126

Corporate Headquarters – 305-378-3000
Marketing/Advertising Information Requests – 305-378-7200
Consumer Relations – 305-378-3535

North America:
Denise Wilson
Media Line: 305-378-7277
After Hours: 1-800-393-3999

For those who are asking below. Why is this ad degrading and sexist in my opinion? In addition to the ham-handed caveman-level subtlety, the woman in the ad is clearly made to look like a blow-up doll.

HT to kirbybruno for locating and posting a link to this article discussing BK’s lame advertising tactics in the comments below:

Burger King Blows Its Marketing Wad

In pertinent part:

Burger King’s (BKC) increasingly obnoxious attempts to lure young dopes to its horrible food may have gone too far this time. The likely slightly older (but award-winning!) dopes… have come up with a print ad shamelessly evoking oral sex to peddle the “BK Super Seven Incher.”

Gawker notes that the “only thing this ad is missing is the disclaimer that you’ll actually get fewer blowjobs if you eat these sandwiches, but perhaps that’s the ‘genius’ of advertising that we simpletons on the outside just don’t get.”

Source

Hungarian police challenge ‘Zionist government’

‘Proud Hungarians must prepare for war against the Jews’
Haaretz (Israel)

June 2, 2009

“Given our current situation, anti-Semitism is not just our right, but it is the duty of every Hungarian homeland lover, and we must prepare for armed battle against the Jews.”

This quote appeared in a newsletter published by an organization calling itself “The trade union of Hungarian police officers prepared for action”.

Hungarian law allows police officers to organize in trade unions of their own. The union — by its own definition — aims to protect the professional interests of those unionized, and not to partake in political activity.

However, the law does not prevent the union from distributing a newsletter, the content of which is at the discretion of its editor, and its editor alone.

The editor of the “prepared for action” union, Judit Szima (who also serves as the secretary-general of the union) didn’t see anything wrong with the content of the article quoted above. It is little wonder, given the fact that the union has signed a cooperation agreement with the radical right wing Hungarian party “Jobbik” (Movement for better Hungary) which backs and operates the extremist paramilitary movement “Hungarian Guard” and warns against the “gypsy crime” — in effect trying to terrorize Hungary’s gypsy community, as well as its Jewish community or anyone else they don’t like.

[Let’s not forget that the current government in Tel Aviv could also be described as ‘radical right wing’ and ‘extremist.’ As for the lumping together of Jews and Gypsies as historical co-victims, this sounds like a ruse: I don’t hear anyone complaining about Gypsies ‘buying out Manhattan, Poland, Hungary’ (see below) -- 800]

Szima is the Jobbik candidate in the upcoming election for the European Union parliament, to be held June 7. [One has to wonder, though, why Szima believes the EU parliament is any more free of Zionist control than her own government -- 800]

She has been removed from her post in the police force ahead of the election, but continues to serve as the union’s secretary general.

The author of the article, which focuses on the duty of every Hungarian patriot to adopt anti-Semitism, did not stop at one.

The following issue of the newsletter included another of his articles, in which he argued “I am in favor of peaceful solutions. But a peaceful solution could only be implemented if our Zionist government were to relocate to Tel Aviv, as it is them who are calling for war.”

“A crumbling country, torn apart by Hungarian-Gypsy civil war, could easily be claimed by the rich Jews,” the article went on to say. “That is why we should expect a Hungarian-Gypsy civil war, fomented by Jews as they rub their hands together with pleasure.”

This article elicited an official complaint filed with the prosecution, arguing that it contained incitement against minority groups. The prosecution rejected the complaint, stating that it did not call for violence against Jews or Gypsies, but rather called to defend against these groups’ probable attack.

The “prepared for action” union affair is a testament to the state of racist incitement and anti-Semitism in Hungary. It has emerged that the union boasts more than 4,000 members, some 10 percent of the total number of police officers in Hungary. It is believed that in Budapest, the capital, the numbers are higher. This is not to say that all the union members harbor the same racist views held by its primary spokespeople and leaders — in most cases members join the union simply to protect their personal rights — but the Hungarian government and justice system can’t, or won’t, take action to separate the union’s lawful protection of policemen’s rights and its detestable political activities.

For example, after the recent resignation of Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsány, one of the candidates for the post was Gyorgy Suranyi, formerly the governor of the Hungarian Central Bank, a brilliant economist, and (unfortunately) a Jew.

The extreme right Hungarian Justice and Life party published on the front page of its newsletter a picture of Suranyi’s face inside a yellow star of David (reminiscent of the yellow patch from the days of Fascism) with the following caption: “Suranyi is actually the candidate backed by the elderly [Israeli President] Shimon Peres. The takeover deal announced by the Israeli leader has now reached the stage in which a Jewish Hungarian prime minister is required. The deal has been in the works for many months.” (The Forum referred to the unfortunate remark made by Peres recently, when he described the success of Israel’s economy by saying “we are buying out Manhattan, Poland, Hungary…”)

[In light of Peres’ candor, then, it would appear that allegations made by this ‘extreme right’ party regarding the Jewish financial takeover of Hungary are, in fact, true -- 800]

One of the two main reasons for the Hungarian authorities’ failure in the face of racism and anti-Semitism is the fact that there are many right-wing elements within the government, who secretly or outright support the racist views and refuse to battle their perpetrators seriously. The other reason is that during the regime change of the 90s, lawmakers viewed freedom of speech and expression as an absolute priority [as if this were a bad thing -- 800], and to this day don’t provide protection to the victims of the misuse of this freedom.

The above article can be found at: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1089550.html

my source

Dissidents, Hate Speech, Free Speech and Propaganda

Szandor Blestman
June 27, 2009

freespeechI saw Glenn Beck the other day talking about the shooting at the holocaust memorial. On this particular program he wasn´t so much reporting the facts of the case as he was regaling us with his opinion. It appears as if this man James von Brunn has set a tempest upon us with his despicable action. One man kills another and mainstream media personalities are suddenly condemning entire groups of people numbering in the hundreds of thousands if not the millions. One crazy, paranoid, violent old man, perhaps suffering from who knows what kind of brain disorder, takes it upon himself to murder someone in cold blood and suddenly he is not responsible, but shadowy groups of hate mongers must have been pulling his strings? One tragic incident and suddenly I´m hearing rumblings that one of humankind´s most cherished birthrights needs to be monitored by those in power, thus tarnishing the memory of thousands who died in defense of such rights.

Mr. Beck made a statement something to the effect that he felt “9/11 truthers” were dangerous, potentially violent people. He´s been saying things like that for some time. James von Brunn is a racist, angry, violent man whose actions may be judged as that of a madman. Mr. Beck used that man´s individual actions as an excuse to condemn many who are nothing more than peaceful activists or those trying to express a point of view that may seem unacceptable to the majority. Any affiliations James von Brunn may have had, be they with the 9/11 truth movement or with some kind of white supremacist organization, are incidental. Just because he went out and decided to initiate violence against others doesn´t mean that everyone else in all the organizations he was affiliated with are going to go out and start doing the same.

Glenn Beck isn´t the only voice raised against so called hate groups after this incident. I´ve read many a commentary calling for laws making hate speech illegal. All these commentators seem to believe that if people spewing forth hateful rhetoric were forced to remain silent by threat of fines, imprisonment and even violence then hate crimes would no longer occur. They seem to want to put the blame not on the individual who carried out a despicable action, but on people he never met who he happens to agree with on certain issues. These people who want to subvert the right to free speech by outlawing hate speech have missed the point on why the right to free speech needs to be honored and preserved no matter how hateful, vile or disgusting that speech may be.

On the surface, hate speech laws might seem like a good idea to many, maybe even to a majority of people. In fact, I would say the vast majority of people don´t want to hear someone spewing hatred and would disagree with what was being said. There are, however, some things many people might not have considered. First, unpopular speech is the very speech that needs protecting, for speech that most people agree with is in no danger of being censored. Second, who is going to decide what constitutes hate speech? I can tell you this, it doubt very much it will be you or me.

People in power would be the ones determining what constitutes hate speech. People in power are people with agendas. People in power are people who have a tendency to want to take care of their own interests and the interests of their friends and supporters first and consider what´s best for the general populace second. There is often found, on close examination, conflicts of interest between legislation being considered and the interests of those who would vote on that legislation. People in power are people who have biases. In short, people in power are fallible human beings who can make mistakes and do the wrong thing, knowingly or unknowingly, just like anybody else. Perhaps more importantly, people in power today may not be in power tomorrow. The best policy, in my humble opinion, would be the policy of I won´t censor what you have to say and you don´t censor what I have to say.

I suspect that if a hate speech law were to go into effect, it would not be long until dissenters would be imprisoned for speaking out against government policy. In fact, it seems to me this is already happening. The recent articles I´ve written about imprisoning journalists are examples of government curtailing free speech. A law prohibiting hate speech, or any kind of speech for that matter, is just another step toward legitimizing the attempts to silence criticism of government, for it is government personnel who would be determining what hate speech was and it is not hard to imagine that they would soon consider legitimate criticism as hate speech.

One does not even have to dig very deep or look very hard to see how easily such a law could be abused. A good example would be the disturbing thoughts and words of Glenn Beck. He has not hidden his hatred for the 9/11 truth movement. He has made accusations against them that in my opinion are unfair and unfounded. He has called them crazy and dangerous and yet I have never heard these groups officially advocate violence, nor have a seen it reported that they have. Perhaps some individuals who claim affiliation with these groups may have made some questionable comments or threats, I don´t know. If so, then those particular individuals should be chastised, exposed and held responsible for their words and actions. I am fairly certain, however, judging from comments he´s made, that if Glenn Beck could have his way he´d throw anyone that questions the official story of 9/11 in prison just for their beliefs.

It seems to me that many of the people involved with the 9/11 truth movement simply want a valid investigation into the incident. I don´t blame them considering the make up of the 9/11 commission that undertook that investigation nearly a year after the incident. They seem to me to simply want unbiased answers to questions that fester to this day. It seems to me that they are only asking for justice concerning a crime for which perhaps the wrong people were punished. It´s too bad that Mr. Beck seems to have developed a personal grudge against this group of people, which includes a large swath of the population, but he should know better than to condemn an entire group because of his perception of a few of them.

Mr. Beck has accused “9/11 truthers,” along with white supremacists, of wanting to destroy the country. He has unfairly equated in a very subtle way people questioning the official 9/11 explanation with racists. This is a card that has been overused and abused by far too many powerful people in the media. In the same breath he condemns people who may want to see certain elements in the government prosecuted for crimes they may have committed with wanting to destroy the country. It seems to me that Mr. Beck is far too caught up in group think to be considered libertarian, as he likes to call himself.

The last thing that perhaps Mr. Beck hasn´t considered is that he himself may be engaging in hate speech, or that at least his words could be construed as hate speech. Other media personalities calling for the enactment of hate speech laws are just as guilty of not considering this. If the “9/11 truthers,” or the white supremacists, or some group sympathetic to them were to gain power, they could conceivably use these same hate speech laws so many are clamoring for against the very people who want them enacted. Can you see how slippery the slope is here? Can you tell how easily laws such as this can be abused? One need look no farther back in history than the last election to see how power changes hands and laws abused by one group of people can be quickly used against that same group when the tables are turned. The real purpose of hate speech laws would not be to stop hate crimes from occurring, it would be to stifle dissent.

Finally, Mr. Beck expressed his fear that he felt there was going to be a witch hunt. I agree with him on that point, but unlike him I don´t think the witch hunters are going to go after Jews and conservatives. Witch hunts are started by people in power with an agenda, not by marginalized individuals spewing hatred. I think that perhaps he is trying to start and spur on a witch hunt of his own against people in the 9/11 truth movement and perhaps other dissenters who may have differing ideas than his of what is truth, how to try to make people aware of their point of view, and how to go about trying to bring change to our broken system. If history is any indication, then if ever a real witch hunt does take place in this nation, it will likely be one launched by the government, it will likely be used to snuff out those trying to expose a truth that some power does not want known, and likely powerful media outlets will help it along by spreading misinformation and propaganda.

Free speech is an ideal that should not be compromised. Do not let those who oppose it fool you into believing that they are trying to produce a more secure society. A government that can imprison people with impunity for one form of speech, can imprison people with impunity for any form of speech.

Source

//
//

Healthcare Hypocrisy

As an Illinois state senator, Barack Obama proudly called himself a proponent of single payer healthcare. But now that he’s president, he won’t even consider it as an option for the reform our healthcare system so desperately needs. What do you suppose happened between then and now?

HOMEWORK:

Obama Issues Signing Statement On War Spending Bill…

Nader: Obama’s Flip-Flop on Single Payer
http://www.singlepayeraction.org/blog…

CBO Says 36 Million Still Uninsured Ten Years From Now Under Most Robust Democratic Plan
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/nod…

Obama 2003 healthcare comment
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAz0qz…

Single Payer vs. Obama’s “Public Option”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWBZz0…
From Nick Skala, a single payer advocate on the front lines in Washington

Single Payer Action
http://www.singlepayeraction.org

Source

Austrian Journalist Files Charges Against WHO, U.N. and Several High Ranking Government & Corporate Officials for Bioterrorism and Attempts to Commit Mass Murder

All Seeing Eye of the Illuminati

All Seeing Eye of the Illuminati

As the anticipated July release date for Baxter’s A/H1N1 flu pandemic vaccine approaches, an Austrian investigative journalist is warning the world that the greatest crime in the history of humanity is underway.


Jane Burgermeister has recently filed criminal charges with the FBI against the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations (UN), and several of the highest ranking government and corporate officials concerning bioterrorism and attempts to commit mass murder. She has also prepared an injunction against forced vaccination which is being filed in America. These actions follow her charges filed in April against Baxter AG and Avir Green Hills Biotechnology of Austria for producing contaminated bird flu vaccine, alleging this was a deliberate act to cause and profit from a pandemic.

Summary of claims and allegations filed with FBI in Austria on June 10, 2009

In her charges, Burgermeister presents evidence of acts of bioterrorism that is in violation of U.S. law by a group operating within the U.S. under the direction of international bankers who control the Federal Reserve, as well as WHO, UN and NATO. This bioterrorism is for the purpose of carrying out a mass genocide against the U.S. population by use of a genetically engineered flu pandemic virus with the intent of causing death. This group has annexed high government offices in the U.S.

President Obama

President Obama

Specifically, evidence is presented that the defendants, Barack Obama, President of the U.S, David Nabarro, UN System Coordinator for Influenza, Margaret Chan, Director-General of WHO, Kathleen Sibelius, Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services, Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, David de Rotschild, banker, David Rockefeller, banker, George Soros, banker, Werner Faymann, Chancellor of Austria, and Alois Stoger, Austrian Health Minister, among others, are part of this international corporate criminal syndicate which has developed, produced, stockpiled and employed biological weapons to eliminate the population of the U.S. and other countries for financial and political gain.

The charges contend that these defendants conspired with each other and others to devise, fund and participate in the final phase of the implementation of a covert international bioweapons program involving the pharmaceutical companies Baxter and Novartis. They did this by bioengineering and then releasing lethal biological agents, specifically the “bird flu” virus and the “swine flu virus” in order to have a pretext to implement a forced mass vaccination program which would be the means of administering a toxic biological agent to cause death and injury to the people of the U.S. This action is in direct violation of the Biological Weapons Anti-terrorism Act.

Burgermeister’s charges include evidence that Baxter AG, Austrian subsidiary of Baxter International, deliberately sent out 72 kilos of live bird flu virus, supplied by the WHO in the winter of 2009 to 16 laboratories in four counties. She claims this evidence offers clear proof that the pharmaceutical companies and international government agencies themselves are actively engaged in producing, developing, manufacturing and distributing biological agents classified as the most deadly bioweapons on earth in order to trigger a pandemic and cause mass death.

In her April charges, she noted that Baxter’s lab in Austria, one of the supposedly most secure biosecurity labs in the world, did not adhere to the most basic and essential steps to keep 72 kilos of a pathogen classified as a bioweapon secure and separate from all other substances under stringent biosecurity level regulations, but it allowed it to be mixed with the ordinary human flu virus and sent from its facilities in Orth in the Donau.

In February, when a staff member at BioTest in the Czech Republic tested the material meant for candidate vaccines on ferrets, the ferrets died. This incident was not followed up by any investigation from the WHO, EU, or Austrian health authorities. There was no investigation of the content of the virus material, and there is no data on the genetic sequence of the virus released.

In answer to parliamentary questions on May 20th, the Austrian Health Minister, Alois Stoger, revealed that the incident had been handled not as a biosecurity lapse, as it should have been, but as an offence against the veterinary code. A veterinary doctor was sent to the lab for a brief inspection.

Burgermeister’s dossier reveals that the release of the virus was to be an essential step for triggering a pandemic that would allow the WHO to declare a Level 6 Pandemic. She lists the laws and decrees that would allow the UN and WHO to take over the United States in the event of pandemic. In addition, legislation requiring compliance with mandatory vaccinations would be put into force in the U.S. under conditions of pandemic declaration.

She charges that the entire “swine flu” pandemic business is premised on a massive lie that there is no natural virus out there that poses a threat to the population. She presents evidence leading to the belief that the bird flu and swine flu viruses have, in fact, been bio-engineered in laboratories using funding supplied by the WHO and other government agencies, among others. This “swine flu” is a hybrid of part swine flu, part human flu and part bird flu, something that can only come from laboratories according to many experts.

WHO’s claim that this “swine flu” is spreading and a pandemic must be declared ignores the fundamental causes. The viruses that were released were created and released with the help of WHO, and WHO is overwhelmingly responsible for the pandemic in the first place. In addition, the symptoms of the supposed “swine flu” are indistinguishable from regular flu or from the common cold. The “swine flu” does not cause death anymore often than the regular flu causes death.

Burgermeister notes that the figures for deaths reported for the “swine flu” are inconsistent and there is no clarity as to how the number of “deaths” has been documented.

There is no pandemic potential unless mass vaccinations are carried out to weaponize the flu under the guise of protecting the population. There are reasonable grounds for believing that the mandatory vaccines will be purposely contaminated with diseases that are specifically designed to cause death.

Reference is made to a licensed Novartis bird flu vaccine that killed 21 homeless people in Poland in the summer of 2008 and had as its “primary outcome measure” an “adverse events rate”, thereby meeting the U.S. government’s own definition of a bioweapon (a biological agent designed to cause an adverse events rate, i.e death or injury) with a delivery system (injection).

She alleges that the same complex of international pharmaceutical companies and international government agencies that have developed and released pandemic material have positioned themselves to profit from triggering the pandemic with contracts to supply vaccines. Media controlled by the group that is engineering the “swine flu” agenda is spreading misinformation to lull the people of the U.S. into taking the dangerous vaccine.

The people of the U.S. will suffer substantial and irreparable harm and injury if they are forced to take this unproven vaccine without their consent in accordance with the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act, National Emergency Act, National Security Presidential Directive/NSPD 51, Homeland Security Presidential Directive/HSPD-20, and the International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza.

In the U.S. since 2008, Burgermeister charges that those named in her allegations have implemented new and/or accelerated the implementation of laws and regulations designed to strip the citizens of the U.S. of their lawful constitutional rights to refuse an injection. These people have created or allowed provisions to remain in place that make it a criminal act to refuse to take an injection against pandemic viruses. They have imposed other excessive and cruel penalties such as imprisonment and/or quarantine in FEMA camps while barring the citizens of the U.S. from claiming compensation from injury or death from the forced injections. This is in violation of the laws governing federal corruption and the abuse of office as well as of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Through these actions, the named defendants have laid the groundwork for mass genocide.

Using the “swine flu” as a pretext, the defendants have preplanned the mass murder of the U.S. population by means of forced vaccination. They have installed an extensive network of FEMA concentration camps and identified mass grave sites, and they have been involved in devising and implementing a scheme to hand power over the U.S. to an international crime syndicate that uses the UN and WHO as a front for illegal racketeering influenced organized crime activities, in violation of the laws that govern treason.

Baxter International Headquarters

Baxter International Headquarters

She further charges that the complex of pharmaceutical companies consisting of Baxter, Novartis and Sanofi Aventis are part of a foreign-based dual purpose bioweapons program, financed by this international criminal syndicate and designed to implement mass murder to reduce the world’s population by more than 5 billion people in the next ten years. Their plan is to spread terror to justify forcing people to give up their rights, and to force mass quarantine in FEMA camps. The houses, companies and farms and lands of those who are killed will be up for grabs by this syndicate.

By eliminating the population of North America, the international elite gain access to the region’s natural resources such as water and undeveloped oil lands. And by eliminating the U.S. and its democratic constitution by subsuming it under a North American Union, the international crime group will have total control over North America.

Highlights from the complete dossier

The complete dossier of the June 10th action is a 69 page document presenting evidence to substantiate all charges. This includes:

Factual background that delineates time lines and facts that establish probable cause, UN and WHO definitions and roles, and history and incidents from the April, 2009 “swine flu” outbreak.

Evidence the “swine flu” vaccines are defined as bioweapons as delineates in government agencies and regulations classifying and restricting vaccines, and the fear of foreign countries that “swine flu” vaccines will be used for biological warfare.

Scientific evidence the “swine flu” virus is an artificial (genetic) virus.

Scientific evidence the “swine flu” was bioengineered to resemble the Spanish flu virus of 1918 including quotes from Swine Flu 2009 is Weaponized 1918 Spanish Flu by A. True Ott, Ph.D., N.D., and a Science Magazine report from Dr. Jeffrey Taubenberger et.al.

The genome sequence of the “swine flu”

Evidence of the deliberate release of the “swine flu” in Mexico

Evidence as to the involvement of President Obama that delineates his trip to Mexico which coincided with the recent “swine flu” outbreak and the death of several officials involved in his trip. Contention is made that the President was never tested for “swine flu” because he had been previously vaccinated.

Evidence as to the role of Baxter and WHO in producing and releasing pandemic virus material in Austria includes a statement from a Baxter official stating the accidentally distributed H5N1 in the Czech Republic was received from a WHO reference center. This includes delineation of evidence and allegations from Burgermeister’s charges filed in April in Austria that are currently under investigation.

Evidence Baxter is an element in a covert bioweapons network

Evidence Baxter has deliberately contaminated vaccine material.

Evidence Novartis is using vaccines as bioweapons

Evidence as to WHO’s role in the bioweapons program

Evidence as to WHO’s manipulation of disease data in order to justify declaring a Pandemic Level 6 in order to seize control of the USA.

Evidence as to the FDA’s role in covering up the bioweapons program

Evidence as to Canada’s National Microbiology Lab’s role in the bioweapons program.

Evidence of the involvement of scientists working for the UK’s NIBSC, and the CDC in engineering the “swine flu”.

Evidence vaccinations caused the Spanish killer flu of 1918 including belief of Dr. Jerry Tennant that the widespread use of aspirin during the winter that followed the end of World War I could have been a key factor contributing to the earlier pandemic by suppressing the immune system and lowering body temperatures, allowing the flu virus to multiply. Tamiflu and Relenza also lower body temperatures, and therefore can also be expected to contribute to the spread of a pandemic.

Evidence as to manipulation of the legal framework to allow mass murder with impunity.

Constitutional issues: the legality vs. illegality of jeopardizing the life, health and public good by mass vaccinations.

The issue of immunity and compensation as evidence of intent to commit a crime.

Evidence as to the existence of an international corporate crime syndicate.

Illuminati Control Chart

Illuminati Control Chart

Evidence of the existence of the “Illuminati”.

Evidence as to the depopulation agenda of the Illuminati/Bilderbergs and their involvement in the engineering and release of the artificial “swine flu” virus.

Evidence that weaponized flu was discussed at the annual Bilderberg meeting in Athens from May 14-17, 2009, as part of their agenda of genocide, including a list of attendees who, according to a statement once made by Pierre Trudeau, view themselves as genetically superior to the rest of humanity.

Media is keeping Americans clueless about the threat they are under

Jane Burgermeister is a dual Irish/Austrian who has written for Nature, the British Medical Journal, and American Prospect. She is the European Correspondent of the Renewable Energy World website. She has written extensively about climate change, biotechnology, and the ecology.

In addition to the charges currently under investigation that she filed against Baxter AG and Avir Green Hills Biotechnology in April, she has filed charges against WHO and Baxter among others concerning a case of exploding “swine flu” vials meant for a research lab on a busy IC train in Switzerland.

In her view, control of the media by the ruling elite has allowed the world crime syndicate to further its agenda unabated while the rest of the people remain in the dark about what is really going on. Her charges are an attempt to get around this media control and bring the truth to light.

Her greatest concern is that “in spite of the fact Baxter has been caught red handed nearly triggering pandemic, they are also moving ahead, together with allied pharma companies, with supplying the vaccine for pandemics.” Baxter is hurrying to get this vaccine to market some time in July.

by Barbara Minton, Natural Health Editor
See all articles by this author


For more information:
http://www.naturalnews.com/025760.html
http://birdflu666.wordpress.com/200…
http://in.news.yahoo.com/137/200906…
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/…

Swine flu made in USA

An American investigative journalist, who claims that swine flu strains have been engineered in two universities in the US and Canada, says they’ve been deliberately designed to resist vaccines.

1Million+ in US have had swine flu: official

$1.4 million a day on health care lobbyists

Source

Bilderberg 2009 Intel Already Proving Accurate

By James Corbett

Daniel Estulin and Jim Tucker

Daniel Estulin and Jim Tucker

Veteran Bilderberg researchers Jim Tucker and Daniel Estulin hit the mark once again as insider info becomes reality.

Observers of the annual elitist confab known as Bilderberg have long known that plans discussed at the conference quickly become reality.

In 2002, Bilderberg researcher Jim Tucker correctly predicted that the Iraq war would start in March 2003 (not late 2002, as many were predicting at the time).

In 2006, Daniel Estulin correctly forecast the popping of the housing bubble and subsequent economic crash, a possibility that most talking heads in the corporate media were laughing at at the time.

In 2008, Tucker forecast a dramatic drop in oil prices while most analysts were fretting about the possibility of $200 a barrel oil.

Tucker and Estulin have proven so stunningly accurate in their predictions not because they have a crystal ball, but because they have sources inside the Bilderberg Group and other organizations where financial oligarchs and their political puppets make decisions about our geopolitical future.

2009 is not even half over, but it seems the forecasts made by both Estulin and Tucker based on their 2009 Bilderberg sources are already proving to be accurate.

In a phone interview conducted as this year’s conference was getting underway in Greece, Daniel Estulin warned The Corbett Report that the powers that be were preparing to run up the stock market one final time in order to draw the masses back into investing before crashing the market. Now, a worrying new report suggests that this is precisely the case as corporate executives start ditching their stocks at a rate not seen in years. Watch an excerpt from the interview in the video player below:

Daniel Estulin on Bilderberg 2009

The Bloomberg report suggests that the market—currently enjoying one of the greatest rallies in decades as stocks continue to rise from last year’s post-crash nadir—is about to have the rug pulled out from under it, a fact that corporate executives in the know are taking to heart as they scramble to get rid of their worthless stocks before the general public realize what’s going on. Add to this the stunning news that U.S. Embassies around the globe have been instructed to prepare for a bank holiday in September and growing opposition to the Obama Administration’s stunning proposal to give the private Federal Reserve sweeping new dictatorial powers over the entire U.S. economy and there is little doubt that an economic collapse the likes of which Estulin discussed is becoming more likely by the day.

Should an economic collapse occur as predicted, social and political changes of world historical importance will be the inevitable result. Jim Tucker, who also recently joined The Corbett Report for a telephone interview, has predicted that the ongoing world financial crisis will be manipulated by Bilderberg to further their long-held goal of crafting a North American Union along the lines of the European Union. Indeed, we have already seen call for the centralization of financial regulatory power from Bilderbergers like German chancellor Angela Merkel, who argue that national sovereignty over financial regulation is what caused the crisis in the first place.

More chillingly, Estulin believes the worldwide economic depression which we are currently entering could ultimately result in the deaths of over 4 billion people, or roughly 2/3 of the planet’s population.

This is certainly one way to achieve elitist goals of vast population reduction, an item high on the agenda of another secretive meeting of billionaires (chaired by Bilderberger David Rockefeller) just weeks before this year’s Bilderberg conference.

Jim Tucker also stressed that manipulation of the swine flu hysteria was high on this year’s agenda, and that this crisis too would be used to consolidate power in international bodies such as the WHO. Preparations for ceding more and more power to unaccountable international bureaucrats in the event of a flu pandemic have been carefully crafted for years, and now the butchering of national sovereignty is to begin in earnest. Watch a portion of the Jim Tucker interview in the player below:

Jim Tucker on Bilderberg 2009

Again, recent events have made Tucker’s Bilderberg intelligence that much more credible. Since Bilderberg, the WHO has declared the first pandemic of the 21st century, opening the door to the very WHO power grab that Tucker warned about. The first real test of those powers may be as early as this fall, when a much-hyped seasonal resurgence of the surprisingly weak H1N1 flu may be used as an excuse to implement mass vaccinations. Preparations for just such a plan have been made in country after country including Canada, the U.S. and France.

The prospect of the WHO using their own campaign of swine flu hysteria to justify mass vaccinations in countries around the globe is triply frightening.

Firstly, the vaccinations could be made mandatory, thus breaking fundamental tenants of freedom from forced medication which is the very pillar of a free society.

Secondly, the swine flu vaccine is being developed by the very company that earlier this year sent out doses of live bird flu to be mixed in with their flu vaccines, an “accident” so incredibly likely that doctors in the Czech Republic accused the company of actually attempting to provoke a pandemic.

Thirdly, the idea of a mass vaccination campaign is worrying because, as one of the co-developers of Tamiflu recently surmised, the recent swine flu strain itself was likely created during the vaccine production process.

For more information on the swine flu and the possible implementation of “medical martial law”, please watch the following video:

Medical Martial Law

Although the verification of this Bilderberg intelligence is of course quite worrying, the fact that Tucker and Estulin’s sources have proven accurate yet again provides some small solace. Firstly, it shows that the elitist plans can be exposed (and, if enough political will can be mustered, stopped) by legitimate researchers and alternative media. Secondly, it further discredits the corporate controlled media, which has only begun to shift from its previous canard that Bilderberg doesn’t exist to its latest canard that Bilderberg exists but is not important.

The longer the corporate media continues to hold to this line in the face of blatantly obvious facts, the further discredited they will become and the faster the public will abandon the fast-disappearing media apparatus of the corporate propaganda machine. Meanwhile, the alternative media will continue to grow exponentially and awareness of Bilderberg amongst the general public will continue to rise.

Related works from The Corbett Report:

Bilderberg 2009 (podcast episode)

Tucker: Bilderberg to Exploit Swine Flu Hysteria (article)

Bill Clinton admits to violating federal law (video)

James Corbett
The Corbett Report

“As long as there has been one true God, there has been killing in his name.”

Quote by Sir Leigh Teabing from the film The Da Vinci Code

burnisraelburnAs Above, So Below: The Jews Will Kill All the Nations (All the Goyim)

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

http://www.jewishracism.com

http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com

One of the Jews’ favorite passages in the Old Testament is Jeremiah 30:11

“For I am with thee, saith the LORD, to save thee: though I make a full end of all nations whither I have scattered thee, yet will I not make a full end of thee: but I will correct thee in measure, and will not leave thee altogether unpunished.”

In the New American Standard Bible version, this passage is translated as:

“‘For I am with you,’ declares the LORD, ‘to save you; For I will destroy completely all the nations where I have scattered you, Only I will not destroy you completely But I will chasten you justly And will by no means leave you unpunished.’.”

The Jewish god, the Devil, clearly states in the Old Testament that he is going to kill off the human race and leave only Jews alive. This is precisely how the Jews interpret this passage.

Judaism is an ugly religion. The Old Testament is completely devoid of spirituality or any sophisticated Metaphysics. It is instead a set of laws, prophecies, and a fabricated history which the Jews created around 500BC so that they could petition the King of the Persians to give them back their religious lands which they never in fact owned.

As such, the Jews created a work which plagiarizes the history and laws of the Egyptian gods and of the Babylonians, without even attempting to answer such questions as what is the human soul or what is the meaning of life.

Instead, the Jew is taught to obey a rigid and racist absolute set of laws, which instruct the Jews to genocide the Palestinians, steal their land, and to conquer and genocide the human race. Later Jews attempted to fill this complete spiritual void left by the OT with Christianity and with the Talmud. Later came the Cabalah. However, while still in Jewish hands, these works are childish and mundane, far less sophisticated than the works of their contemporaries and predecessors. The Talmud and Cabalah continue the hatred, racism and genocidal intent of the OT.

“As Above, So Below” is the occultists’ mantra, and the Jews are, and have always been, occultists. The Star of David is made up of a triangle pointing upwards and a triangle pointing downwards. The Freemasons compass and square is a thinly vieled disguise for the Star of David, and both indicate, “As Above, So Below”.

The Jews believe that there are seventy gods who watch over the Goyim, the nations. The seventy angels, or princes of the Gentiles are overseen by Sammael, Satan. The Jews sacrifice a goat every year, known as the “scapegoat”, to Sammael so that he will convey all of the sins of the Jews onto the Goyim and mediate for the Jews with god. Sammael sells out the Goyim he is bound to protect for a mere goat and the Goyim are thereby blamed for all the crimes of the Jews. We can see how the Jews also scapegoat the Goyim for their Jewish crimes here on Earth. As Above, So Below.

The Jews believe that by controlling the human opposition to Jewry, by employing corrupted and crypto-Jewish leadership to mislead the Goyim, they can provoke wars between the 70/71 nations of non-Jews and kill them off. The Jews believe that by doing this, they can effect the heavenly battle between the 70 gods of the Goyim, the Elohim, and Sammael, against the Jewish god, the Devil.

I am risking my life telling you all of this, because the Jews believe that if these facts are known to the Goyim, the Goyim will exterminate the Jews,

“And if the Nations [the Goyim] should know, that through this Goat the Sins of Israel came upon their Necks, they would (which God forbid) not suffer an Israelite to live, not a single Day.”

When the Jews lie to you and state that Zionism has nothing to do with Judaism, and that it is political, not religious, know that politics is religion for the Jews. Their religion has no real spiritualism. The Jews believe that the goings on in the political World are mirrored by the heavenly World, and that the battles they provoke between Goy nations provokes the Goy gods to destroy one another, and thereby leave the Gentiles without supernatural protection. Politics on Earth is politics in Heaven for the Jew. The Jew associates Sammael with Esau, Amalek, Haman and Edom, and therefore, Blacks and/or Christendom are the primary targets for Jewish bloodlust, witness the slave trade and the genocides of Christian Armenians and Slavs.

Remember that as Zionism conquered the Palestinians on Earth, the Jews believe a like battle was and is being fought in Heaven. As Above, So Below. Never forget that the Jews want to kill these angels, and with them mankind, and openly state this fact in the genocidal Old Testament in Jeremiah 30:11, which is repeatedly cited in the later literature as justification for the Jewish call to kill all non-Jews. The Jews’ spiritualism is politics, in particular the politics of war, genocide and usury. The Jews believe that they are god, the Jewish Devil, As Above, So Below, the Devil in the Jewish heavens and the Jews on Earth are mirror images of one another in Jewish beliefs. The flag of the Nation of Israel bears this mystical belief, which calls for the complete extermination of all non-Jewish nations, all non-Jewish peoples, all non-Jews. The flag of the Jews is an open declaration of war on the human race.

The Jews believe “As Above, So Below”. We had better adopt the slogan, “Us or Them”.

Source

Update from Whitewraithe and recent article on Gun Ownership

A few weeks ago I forewarned my readers that since returning to work that there would be occasional delays in posting new material.  Then last weekend my pc was infected with a trojan worm called Personal Antivirus, which I’m still trying to remove. I am keeping up with current news and events and will have quite a large amount of material posted by this weekend.  In the meantime check out the article below…..Whitewraithe~

THE REAL REASON FOR GUN OWNERSHIP

by The Company of Freemen

THE STATE CREATES ITS OWN ENEMIES

Goulishly capitalizing on the tragedy of a mass murder, the anti-gun forces are surging forward with their plans for total gun confiscation. If law-abiding private citizens were disarmed, they claim, criminals and crazies would be unable to kill and maim. That’s an obvious lie–criminals, by definition, disobey laws, and madmen can kill with knives, cars, or champagne bottles as easily and as senselessly as they can with guns. The not-so-secret agenda of the State and its apologists is clear: disarm peaceful citizens to render them powerless. Turn law-abiding Americans into criminals with the stroke of a legislative pen. Anyone who refuses to surrender his or her weapons would become an Enemy Of The State, much the same as any armed citizen is right now in the Soviet Union, or Communist China, or Socialist Nicaragua, or Fascist El Salvador, or Monarchist Great Britain. Gun confiscation is non-partisan–it is always and forever aimed at anyone disliked by the current gang in power.

GUN SEIZURE SPARKED 1776 REVOLUTION

The American Revolution began in a dispute over gun control when British Redcoats marched toward Lexington and Concord to disarm farmers there. London claimed to be the “legitimate” government ruling America, just as Washington or Sacremento or Albany claims to be today. And their attempt to disarm us, stems from the same power lust that drove King George. We must, therefore, hold onto our guns–legally or illegally–for the very same reason the colonists did.

THE TRUTH ABOUT GUN OWNERSHIP

The anti-gunners, certain that the role of government is to grant privileges and dictate behavior, shout that citizens have no reason to be “allowed” to own assault rifles, which have “no legitimate sporting use.” The Constitution, though, says nothing about “a well-regulated sporting club” being necessary. We do not own handguns, assault rifles, shotguns, and other powerful weapons because we are hunters or plinkers or collectors. We do not even own guns because the Constitution “allows” us to. The Constitution does not “grant” rights. It recognizes rights already and irrevocably held forever by the people themselves (individuals), and forbids government from trampling on them. We have a right to keep and bear arms regardless of whether the Second Amendment exists or not! All Article Two guarantees is that we shouldn’t have to defend that right against “our” federal government. We’ve seen that simple guarantee erode, though, haven’t we?

The real reason for gun ownership is to protect the individual from the State, whether it be an invading State from accross the seas or a domestic State grown tyrannical and oppressive. The goal of total, repressive confiscation is clear in the subtle, shifting arguments of the anti-gun forces. When handguns were the target, they clamored prohibition because handguns were not militia-type weapons protected by the Second Amendment. Now they cry for assault rifle bans because “mere citizens” have no business possessing “military-style” weapons!

These eager confiscators rightly point out that assault rifles, handguns, and indeed all “weapons” have only one purpose: to kill. Again they speak a truth, but only partially. The unasked question is, “To kill whom? And under what circumstances?” The answer is, “To kill any who attempt to rob, maim, rape, or kill us.” Even that answer, though, does not fully express the most important reason for gun ownership. Only a small number of people are actually touched by criminal violence. The State, though, touches each and every one of us every hour of every day. People in government seek to tax our earnings to pay for their whims, to draft our children to fight in wars they start, to regulate and interfere with our lives out of pure love of power and their desire to wield it. They have become as tyrannical as any Tory redcoat, Soviet Commissar, or Nazi Gestapo. And they are coming to steal your last line of defense against them. Will you meekly obey?

GUN CONTROL ENFORCED AT GUNPOINT

When any law against guns is passed, how is it backed up? How will the State remove banned weapons from private hands? How will agents of the State disarm the citizenry? Why, by the use of guns, of course! This contradiction has never bothered statists. Why are handguns and assault rifles evil and wicked in the hands of private citizens, yet perfectly fine in the hands of employees of the State? If this is truly “government by the people” why do we see the servants disarming their masters by force? What do they fear from us, if theirs is a legitimate, benevolent government? If the State does not seek to control us, why does it want us disarmed?

The usual answer–stripped of equivocation–is that “mere citizens” are like half-witted children, incapable of safely handling “dangerous” commodities such as weapons or explosives or medicines or information. And only when some half-witted children pass a civil service exam or are elected by other halfwits to work for the wise and benevolent State do they magically become smart and honest and trustworthy enough to carry weapons and decide whom shall be “allowed” to possess guns and what sort of design, shape, or weight such weapons shall be.

Sounds pretty condescending and paternalistic, doesn’t it? That’s how they view us. Sheep for the shearing at tax time, cannon fodder during war time, and dangerous idiots the rest of the time.

And they dare ask us to obey their decrees?

GOVERNMENT CREATES CRIME

What many gun owners refuse to face, usually by saying “it can’t happen in America,” is that the government can and does create new classes of criminals with the mere stroke of a pen. In 1919, Prohibition turns millions of people overnight from sociable drinkers to Enemies Of The State. The victimless crime of ingesting alcohol turned neighborly, peaceful people into fair game for imprisonment, fines, and seizure of property. Some fought back, often with simple shotguns against “revenooers” armed with assault rifles (the Thompson sub-machine gun) in a modern version of the Whiskey Rebellion. The Prohibition amendment created crime by definition. If, tommorow, smoking or drinking coffee or owning a book were declared illegal, the State would suddenly point to a new “criminal underworld” of massive proportions. In the eyes of the State they would become “a new breed of criminal” to be weeded out of society and thrown into prisons. So it is with any prohibition of popular activities, including gun ownership.

GUN PROHIBITION DISARMS THE POOR

Let’s face it–police respond faster to calls from Beverly Hills than they do to calls from Watts. And the rich can afford armed guards, to boot! When so-called Saturday Night Specials are banned, does it affect those who can spend hundreds on a fine pistol? No. Does it prevent criminals from stealing whatever weapon they want or buying it on the black market? No. The only people harmed by a “cheap handgun” ban are the honest poor who have hardly enough money to feed their children, let alone defend them from inner-city marauders. Any form of gun control disarms those least able to defend themselves. And what good is a 15 day waiting period to someone who is threatened by an armed criminal coming by tonight? When one perceives a threat, one should be able to aquire protection immediately.

GUN PROHIBITION IS RACIST

The Gun Control Act of 1968 was rammed down the throats of the American public, blatantly exploiting then-current fears of gun-toting black rioters by implying that the law would help to disarm American Blacks, other minorities, and all dissenters at a time of civil upheaval. to paraphrase a popular slogan, “If the government does not trust minorities with guns, minorities cannot trust government.” Ask any Native American.

In a mirror image case 20 years later, assault rifle bans are being ramrodded through legislatures by appealing to fears that gun-toting white racists are on the loose.

The real and only purpose of gun control is to disarm the innocent and the peaceful, of whatever race, creed, or social status.

GUN PROHIBITION IS SEXIST

The same goes for women. Police and purported feminists urge women to resist rape with fists, fingernails, keyrings, and screams. But why should any woman allow an assailant to get within arms length of her? Why don’t Women’s Rights activists in or out of government reveal the most effective way for a woman to defend herself: to buy a gun and learn to use it? The truth is, they want women to feel weak and perpetually threatened so that they will beg the State for protection. A woman standing proud, armed, and fearless is the last thing most self-proclaimed “feminists” want (since that would undercut their perverse longing for a huge paternalistic government!)

GOVERNMENTS KILL MORE THAN ANY MASS-MURDERER

How can people who work for or worship the State–statists–point to the murder of five children in a schoolyard or twenty people in a restaurant and claim that as sufficient reason to disarm tens of millions of Americans? Are they so presumptuous as to suggest that we are capable of such violent madness? Perhaps there is a degree of psychological projection going on here: statists feel within themselves the urge to kill and project it onto the people they fear the most–us, the victims of the State. For while tens of millions of people own guns, only a minuscule fraction ever use those guns to aggress against others. Every State, however has guns and even more powerful and terrifying weapons in its clutches and every State has used them, will use them, and are using them to murder hundreds, thousands, and millions of innocent, unarmed people.

How can the insane mind of a Patrick Purdy ever dream of matching the death toll of the most minor skirmish in the smallest of wars or “police actions?” The murder of five innocent children is heart-rendingly tragic, but how many thousands of innocent children were roasted in Hiroshima and Nagasaki? How many unarmed, peaceful, young people were slaughtered in Tienanamen Square? How many women, children, and old people have been shot by the bullets of “their own” government in Vietnam, Cambodia, Angola, Nicaragua, El Salvador, India, Israel, Afghanistan, Tibet, Argentina, Libya, Ireland, Russia, South Africa, Chile, Pakistan, Zimbabwe, Iran, and on and on and on for every State you can name, even “our” United States. For statists to use the “mass murder” of a few people as an excuse to disarm Americans when the State is the largest, bloodiest, longest-lived institution of mass-murder in all of history is appallingly hypocritical. Do we owe allegiance to the apologists for such atrocities? NEVER!


Private ownership of weaponry is the last defense against all tyranny, foreign and domestic. The thought that there might come a time when peaceable gun owners (even members of the patriotic NRA) must take arms against an American Li Peng commanding the local police and the US military is anathema to nearly everyone. The possibility, however, must be faced. A lot of American colonists were horrified at the thought of defending themselves against “their” king’s army, too.

CIVILIAN-BASED DEFENSE PREFERED TO STANDING ARMY

Some say that the Constitution “granted” the right to keep and bear arms to provide for a “well-regulated militia.” Since we have a standing army, the argument goes, civilians no longer need to own guns. Yet that amendment was written precisely because the British used that exact argument in their attempts (from 1768 to 1777) to disarm the colonists. Americans detested the standing armies of the British government and knew that civilian-based defense was the ultimate, perhaps the only protection against any threat to liberty, whether from London, Moscow, or Washington, D.C.

DEFYING UNJUST LAWS IS RIGHT AND PROPER!

When the day comes (and it will, if we don’t raise our voices in protest now) that the Imperial State commands its subjects (that’s how they view you and me, regardless of what they say) to turn in our weapons, what will we do? Make no mistake–if people refuse to surrender or destroy their weapons, they will be dealt with by heavily armed police; they will be imprisoned, fined, perhaps even shot if they try to defend their Constitutional–nay, their human–rights.

Of whom should we be more wary–invading troops whose rule we would never sanction, or “our own” government, to which most of us grant some legitimacy and which is right here, right now, all around us? Perhaps paraphrasing a parent’s question will help provide an answer: If the State passed a law telling you to jump off a cliff, would you? No fair answering that “good, pure, sober, honest politicians wouldn’t let that happen.” With guns, it is happening right now.


And when that friendly cop on the beat (whom most gun owners exalt as a good man just doing his job and who may even be a fellow NRA member!) comes around to your house, he will come armed with “good government” handguns and assault rifles. “Sorry pal,” he’ll say, “but the law is the law.”

That possibility is something many gun owners–staunch defenders of law and order and supporters of local police–refuse to face. They blank out the fact that even–perhaps especially–in America, they may have to choose between owning their guns and facing the full implication of the Declaration of Independence,

“…that, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it…”

Some would rather surrender meekly to the State, giving up their last shred of defense against tyranny, rather than face that choice. But if they do surrender their firepower, the choice will have been made. And it won’t matter whether our new masters speak Russian, Chinese, Japanese, English, or American Bureaucratese. They will be our masters nonetheless.

WHAT TO DO

First of all, keep your guns! Do not turn them in just because some law is passed ordering you to do so. That’s just what they want–sheeplike compliance. you are not a criminal. Don’t let the State treat you like one. The colonists who turned in their weapons to their Tory town governments soon learned the folly of their actions. Any government that outlaws gun ownership is an outlaw government! It is no more necessary to obey an oppressive, tyrannical State than it is to obey any thief who demands that you turn over your property under threat of death. We know the free person’s answer to such a demand. So does the State. That is why statists seek to browbeat us into disarming without a fight. They need the sanction of the victim. They cannot hope to disarm us by force. That would tip their hand and guarantee a revolution. But by stealth, instilled guilt, and appeals to our peaceful, law-abiding natures will they attempt to expropriate our only defense against their continued and increasing predations.

Resist the urge to obey the edicts of self-proclaimed rulers. Don’t walk timidly into a concentration camp filled with once-free men and women. Decry with every fiber of your being this trampling of our fundamental human rights!

THE RIGHT TO OWN GUNS IS A CIVIL RIGHT, WITHOUT WHICH ALL OTHER CIVIL RIGHTS ARE IMPOSSIBLE TO DEFEND.

THE RIGHT TO OWN GUNS IS THE RIGHT TO OWN–AND PROTECT–YOUR BODY AND YOUR PROPERTY.

THE RIGHT TO OWN GUNS IS THE RIGHT TO RESIST TYRANNY.

ANY WHO SEIZE GUNS ARE THIEVES OR TYRANTS.

Every law restricting free, immediate access to firearms is a direct attack on individual freedom. The course of action is up to you. Demand the repeal of all such laws or ignore them with impunity. But never accept them as legitimate restraints upon your liberty. Nothing legitimate can issue from the pen of tyrants.

(Permission is explicitly granted to reproduce this article by Xerox®, computer bulletin board, or any other method.)

The Company of Freemen Distributed by

THE FORCE P.O. Box 94 Long Beach, CA 90801

Donations of postage stamps or money to the above group will help greatly in circulating this article!

Source

http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/2009/06/real-reason-for-gun-ownership.html

Real Reason for ‘War on Smoking’

Smoking is good for you?

No Smoking

No Smoking

Why do governments want to ban smoking? I mean, it’s not as if they actually care about their citizens’ health. If so, they would spend more on healing than killing. But, more to the point, they would address the far more personally and socially destructive effects of alcohol and refined sugar, (which of course, are one and the same) evidenced by alcohol fueled late night violence and sex between drunken obese teenagers (and beyond), who cram casualty departments and make our city centres no-go areas until the sun comes up. Yet, regardless of this epidemic, because the sugar/alcohol multinationals’ influence is so powerful, health is a minor distraction – however, tobacco companies carry the same political influence, so this is not the reason. In addition, governments make billions annually from smoking: taxes, needless to say, but also in terms of unneeded pensions and the extraordinary savings in health care which escalate dramatically in old age.

Given this perspective, is it not strange that whilst not exactly pushing it, (they would not want to appear heartless now, would they?) governments do not offer smoking the same tacit approval they give to alcohol, junk food and gambling – all of which are many times more socially destructive?

So why do they hate smoking so much?

It was a question that had tumbled around in my head for months. The best I could come up with, was that they wanted to use the fields for a more lucrative crop. But what, barring illicit drugs, could generate such revenue? (Particularly with Heroin production back up to pre Taliban levels.) It just did not make sense.

Then, by chance i happened upon ‘Political Ponerology’ by Andrew Lobaczewski, which considers how wicked, power hungry people gradually take control over society. And he points out, that the last organised attempt to stifle smoking on the scale now under way in Europe and the United States was in pre-war Germany, under the Nazis. (P.156)

You see, what Nazi scientists discovered very soon into their research, was that carbon-monoxide, a central component of tobacco smoke, creates resistance to pathocratic influence: i.e. imbibers are more likely to question and less likely to blindly follow orders from psychopathic leadership (perhaps we could think of it as ‘attitude’, as symbolised by ’50s icons like James Dean and Marlon Brando). What is more, research also suggests ’second-hand smoke’, as breathed by children of smokers, may in fact immunise them against the influence of psychopaths. Hardly useful, one would suggest, if the objective is filling heads with supremacist beliefs and obtaining undivided loyalty.

To Nazi leadership, with their early, unsophisticated attempts at propaganda, reducing peoples’ critical thinking and increasing their susceptibility to messages of hate and fear and identification were central to their objective. So while the government made supply of tobacco increasingly difficult, and smoking areas increasingly limited, the Nazi propaganda machine set about pushing the party line, vilifying and condemning “red-man’s weed” and persecuting those who would smoke it. It was a campaign begun in the mid 1930s and continued and intensified until they were finally overthrown. (The anti-tobacco campaign of the Nazis – http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/313/7070/1450 )

Today, when one considers the enormous advances in psychological warfare, be it for product sales, national/religious/corporate identity or fear of the other, and the increasingly sophisticated delivery techniques, the need for smoking to be eradicated becomes blazing obvious. What government or corporation (or religion) in their right mind, whose primary goals are submission and association, cannot see the benefit of losing a few million in taxes, pensions, operations… for the benefit of a compliant, malleable ready made workforce, and market. From such a perspective, considering our current political and corporate leadership, it is clear, smoking never stood a chance.

What a good job we have a free and independent news media to stand up for the citizen, expose authoritarian lies and ensure governments and corporations cannot cynically manipulate and frighten people into servicing their nefarious goals… oh, err… looks like we’re in big trouble.

Better get puffing guys!

Source