NO JUSTICE for Whites under Hate Crimes Law

All the whites will die tonight!

That’s what a Hispanic woman, Miriam Leticia Malave, yelled as she and three Hispanic men began attacking white patrons in the M&T Bar in Shenandoah, Pennsylvania last week. Malave attacked a female bartender Melissa Elrod, with a baseball bat.

Shenandoah is full of Hispanics. How did a small town in PA become overrun with Hispanics? You’ll have to ask George “Family values don’t stop at the Rio Grande” Bush about that.

Miss him yet? Well, don’t forget – Sarah Palin says it would be “inhumane” to deport people like Malave and her gang of thugs, so you’ll get a chance to vote for more of the same in 2012.

Last September, Malave stabbed a woman in the thigh and stomach outside La Casita bar in Shenandoah. She was awaiting trial on those charges when she led the attack on white people last week.

Plus, in 2006, Malave and “three Hispanic men” tried to attack white people with baseball bats. When the would be victims escaped, they instead began smashing their cars with the bats.

Prosecutors initially charged the four with hate crimes, criminal mischief, and recklessly endangering another person and conspiracy in the 2006 attack, but then dropped all those charges and reduced it to disorderly conduct.

Do you think if four whites had chased a bunch of Mexicans with baseball bats and then smashed their cars up they would have gotten off with disorderly conduct charges, and without a hate crimes charge?

Me neither.

But Miriam Leticia Malave and three other Hispanics got away with it in 2006.

And now, they’ve actually attacked white people with ball bats, while yelling “all whites will die tonight!”, and guess what?

The prosecutor hasn’t filed hate crime charges this time either! In fact, none of the three Hispanic men who beat the whites in the bar have even been arrested!

The DA says he “hasn’t ruled out” hate crime charges in this case.

Hasn’t ruled them out?

Try to imagine the DA “not ruling out” hate crimes charges if four whites had gone after a bunch of Mexicans with ball bats in 2006, and then smashed their cars, and then attacked white people in a bar while screaming that all whites are gonna die tonight a few years later!

The DA would be in jail for a hate crime himself. Eric Holder would see to that.

But, as Eric Holder explained to Congress during hearings on the most recent hate crimes bill, white people aren’t a protected class under hate crimes law.

So get used to it, white man. And be sure and vote for Sarah Palin in 2012, so we can keep on celebrating diversity!

Source

The Road to Armageddon

By Paul Craig Roberts

The Washington Times is a newspaper that looks with favor upon the Bush/Cheney/Obama/neocon wars of aggression in the Middle East and favors making terrorists pay for 9/11. Therefore, I was surprised to learn on February 24 that the most popular story on the paper’s website for the past three days was the “Inside the Beltway” report, “Explosive News,” [By Jennifer Harper, February 22, 2010]about the 31 press conferences in cities in the US and abroad on February 19 held by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, an organization of professionals which now has 1,000 members.

I was even more surprised that the news report treated the press conference seriously.

How did three World Trade Center skyscrapers suddenly disintegrate into fine dust? How did massive steel beams in three skyscrapers suddenly fail as a result of short-lived, isolated, and low temperature fires? “A thousand architects and engineers want to know, and are calling on Congress to order a new investigation into the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7,” reports the Washington Times.

The paper reports that the architects and engineers have concluded that the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the National Institute of Standards and Technology provided “insufficient, contradictory and fraudulent accounts of the circumstances of the towers’ destruction” and are “calling for a grand jury investigation of NIST officials.”

The newspaper reports that Richard Gage, the spokesperson for the architects and engineers said: “Government officials will be notified that ‘Misprision of Treason,’ U.S. Code 18 (Sec. 2382) is a serious federal offense, which requires those with evidence of treason to act. The implications are enormous and may have profound impact on the forthcoming Khalid Sheik Mohammed trial.”

There is now an organization, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth. At the main press conference in San Francisco, Erik Lawyer, the head of that organization, announced the firefighters’ support for the architects and engineers’ demands. He reported that no forensic investigation was made of the fires that are alleged to have destroyed the three buildings and that this failure constitutes a crime.

Mandated procedures were not followed, and instead of being preserved and investigated, the crime scene was destroyed. He also reported that there are more than one hundred first responders who heard and experienced explosions and that there is radio, audio and video evidence of explosions.

Also at the press conference, physicist Steven Jones presented the evidence of nano-thermite in the residue of the WTC buildings found by an international panel of scientists led by University of Copenhagen nano-chemist Professor Niels Harrit. Nano-thermite is a high-tech explosive/pyrotechnic capable of instantly melting steel girders.

Before we yell “conspiracy theory,” we should be aware that the architects, engineers, firefighters, and scientists offer no theory. They provide evidence that challenges the official theory. This evidence is not going to go away.

If expressing doubts or reservations about the official story in the 9/11 Commission Report makes a person a conspiracy theory kook, then we have to include both co-chairmen of the 9/11 Commission and the Commission’s legal counsel, all of whom have written books in which they clearly state that they were lied to by government officials when they conducted their investigation, or, rather, when they presided over the investigation conducted by executive director Philip Zelikow, a member of President George W. Bush’s transition team and Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board and a co-author of Bush Secretary of State Condi “Mushroom Cloud” Rice.

There will always be Americans who will believe whatever the government tells them no matter how many times they know the government has lied to them. Despite expensive wars that threaten Social Security and Medicare, wars based on non-existent Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, non-existent Saddam Hussein connections to al Qaida, non-existent Afghan participation in the 9/11 attacks, and the non-existent Iranian nukes that are being hyped as the reason for the next American war of aggression in the Middle East, more than half of the U.S. population still believes the fantastic story that the government has told them about 9/11, a Muslim conspiracy that outwitted the entire Western world.

Moreover, it doesn’t matter to these Americans how often the government changes its story. For example, Americans first heard of Osama bin Laden because the Bush regime pinned the 9/11 attacks on him. Over the years video after video was served up to the gullible American public of bin Laden’s pronouncements. Experts dismissed the videos as fakes, but Americans remained their gullible selves. Then suddenly last year a new 9/11 “mastermind” emerged to take bin Laden’s place, the captive Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the detainee waterboarded 183 times until he confessed to masterminding the 9/11 attack.

In the Middle Ages confessions extracted by torture constituted evidence, but self-incrimination has been a no-no in the U.S. legal system since our founding. But with the Bush regime and the Republican federal judges, whom we were assured would defend the U.S. Constitution, the self-incrimination of Sheik Mohammed stands today as the only evidence the U.S. government has that Muslim terrorists pulled off 9/11.

If a person considers the feats attributed to Khalid Sheik Mohammed, they are simply unbelievable. Sheik Mohammed is a more brilliant, capable superhero than V in the fantasy movie, “V for Vendetta.” Sheik Mohammed outwitted all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies along with those of all U.S. allies or puppets, including Israel’s Mossad. No intelligence service on earth or all of them combined was a match for Sheik Mohammed.

Sheik Mohammed outwitted the U.S. National Security Council, Dick Cheney, the Pentagon, the State Department, NORAD, the U.S. Air Force, and Air Traffic Control.

He caused Airport Security to fail four times in one morning. He caused the state-of-the-art air defenses of the Pentagon to fail, allowing a hijacked airliner, which was off course all morning while the U.S. Air Force, for the first time in history, was unable to get aloft interceptor aircraft, to crash into the Pentagon.

Sheik Mohammed was able to perform these feats with unqualified pilots.

Sheik Mohammed, even as a waterboarded detainee, has managed to prevent the FBI from releasing the many confiscated videos that would show, according to the official story, the hijacked airliner hitting the Pentagon.

How naive do you have to be to believe that any human, or for that matter Hollywood fantasy character, is this powerful and capable?

If Sheik Mohammed has these superhuman capabilities, how did the incompetent Americans catch him? This guy is a patsy tortured into confession in order to keep the American naifs believing the government’s conspiracy theory.

What is going on here is that the U.S. government has to bring the 9/11 mystery to an end. The government must put on trial and convict a culprit so that it can close the case before it explodes. Anyone waterboarded 183 times would confess to anything.

The U.S. government has responded to the evidence being arrayed against its outlandish 9/11 conspiracy theory by redefining the war on terror from external to internal enemies. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said on February 21  that American extremists are now as big a concern as international terrorists. Extremists, of course, are people who get in the way of the government’s agenda, such as the 1,000 Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. The group used to be 100, now it is 1,000. What if it becomes 10,000?

Cass Sunstein, an Obama regime official, has a solution for the 9/11 skeptics: Infiltrate them and provoke them into statements and actions that can be used to discredit or to arrest them. But get rid of them at all cost.

Why employ such extreme measures against alleged kooks if they only provide entertainment and laughs? Is the government worried that they are on to something?

Instead, why doesn’t the U.S. government simply confront the evidence that is presented and answer it?

If the architects, engineers, firefighters, and scientists are merely kooks, it would be a simple matter to acknowledge their evidence and refute it.  Why is it necessary to infiltrate them with police agents and to set them up?

Many Americans would reply that “their” government would never even dream of killing Americans by hijacking airliners and destroying buildings in order to advance a government agenda. But on February 3, National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair told the House Intelligence Committee that the U.S. government can assassinate its own citizens when they are overseas. No arrest, trial, or conviction of a capital crime is necessary.  Just straight out murder.

Obviously, if the U.S. government can murder its citizens abroad it can murder them at home, and has done so. For example, 100 Branch Davidians were murdered in Waco, Texas, by the Clinton administration for no legitimate reason. The government just decided to use its power knowing that it could get away with it, which it did.

Americans who think “their” government is some kind of morally pure operation would do well to familiarize themselves with Operation Northwoods. Operation Northwoods was a plot drawn up by the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff for the CIA to commit acts of terrorism in American cities and fabricate evidence blaming Castro so that the U.S. could gain domestic and international support for regime change in Cuba. The secret plan was nixed by President John F. Kennedy and was declassified by the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Review Board. It is available online in the National Security Archive. There are numerous online accounts available, including Wikipedia. James Bamford’s book, Body of Secrets, also summarizes the plot:

“Operation Northwoods, which had the written approval of the Chairman [Gen. Lemnitzer] and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war.”

Prior to 9/11 the American neoconservatives were explicit that the wars of aggression that they intended to launch in the Middle East required “a new Pearl Harbor.”

For their own good and that of the wider world, Americans need to pay attention to the growing body of experts who are telling them that the government’s account of 9/11 fails their investigation. 9/11 launched the neoconservative plan for U.S. world hegemony. As I write the U.S. government is purchasing the agreement of foreign governments that border Russia to accept U.S. missile interceptor bases. The U.S. intends to ring Russia with U.S. missile bases from Poland through central Europe and Kosovo to Georgia, Azerbaijan and central Asia. [See Impending Explosion: U.S. Intensifies Threats To Russia And Iran, by Rick Rozoff, Global Research, February 19, 2010]  U.S. envoy Richard Holbrooke declared on February 20 that al Qaida is moving into former central Asian constituent parts of the Soviet Union, such as Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and Kazakhstan. Holbrooke is soliciting U.S. bases in these former Soviet republics under the guise of the ever-expanding “war on terror.”

The U.S. has already encircled Iran with military bases. The U.S. government intends to neutralize China by seizing control over the Middle East and cutting China off from oil.

This plan assumes that Russia and China, nuclear armed states, will be intimidated by U.S. anti-missile defenses and acquiesce to U.S. hegemony and that China will lack oil for its industries and military.

The U.S. government is delusional. Russian military and political leaders have responded to the obvious threat by declaring NATO a direct threat to the security of Russia and by announcing a change in Russian war doctrine to the pre-emptive launch of nuclear weapons. The Chinese are too confident to be bullied by a washed up American “superpower.”

The morons in Washington are pushing the envelope of nuclear war. The insane drive for American hegemony threatens life on earth. The American people, by accepting the lies and deceptions of “their” government, are facilitating this outcome.

Source

The Mystery Religion Of Money

paper and coin

BIZWOG


(stands for “British Israel Zionist World Occupation Government”)

The inside story of the inside job

THIS ‘JOINT’ WILL REALLY BLOW YOU AWAY, UNHESITATINGLY

24th February 2010

The real books — the real information — can’t be found in bookstores these days. Talk about a chain psyop! Wall to wall kosher self help books. But then, you already know anything advertised on TV can never be anything more than an unnecessary item for a cynically created market.

The real books are all online, available in PDFs, or on wild websites, the real classics by people like Revilo Oliver that no mainstream publisher would dare touch. And so freedom seeps into this imprisoned world solely on the initiative of individuals who have truth to tell in a world controlled by those who don’t want it told. Getting this info out depends on people like you and me.

You’ve heard me mention one of my favorite writers many times before. Former Washington insider R. Duane Willing wrote “Money: The 12th and Final Religion” and I’ve reviewed it at least three times. If you haven’t read it, you should immediately. http://www.rduanewilling.com/ He has a new book ready, tentatively titled “The American Caliphate.” I am trying to get him to use one of his own acronyms in the title: “BIZWOG: The inside story of the inside job.” British Israeli Zionist World Occupation Government about covers it, doesn’t it?

Although it’s way too early to be promoting a book that hasn’t even been published yet, this manuscript is so bubbling over with epiphanies that elicit that “ah ha” reaction that it simply can’t be contained until the book is finally published. It would be unpatriotic, while this fire of economic treason rages across the world, not to alert those seeking solutions to our dilemma of the real world contours of our problem.

It starts out like this.

“Why do you pay interest to another person (the Federal Reserve System, a.k.a. the Egregore) to watch you borrow your own money from yourself?”

Your choices are but two, Willing concludes: We are the victims of either absurdity or deception.

A former high level government official working on banking practices, Willing’s inside stories of the extermination of the Savings & Loan system in the United States by the creation of the money market mutual fund, and how it sounded the death knell for ownership of private property in the U.S., will erase decades of bogus newspaper stories from your mind.

“Obviously, the Federal Reserve could not assure economic security, as is taught by its theory,” Willing comments. “This self serving theory is taught in university classrooms to justify perpetual debt, money interest and stock exchanges.”

Willing writes much in this book about the Federal Reserve, including the story of the Great Depression of 1929, which was deliberately caused by a credit freeze power play in 1928 that cut the money power cord and over the next decade caused seven million deaths in America, mostly from starvation and malnutrition. The 1934 bankruptcy of the U.S. confiscated everyone’s gold, off which they made a 40 percent profit while the Dust Bowl raged and people starved.

Willing tells the story of the real reason why Nixon was impeached. He messed with the Federal Reserve monopoly.

Among the many amazing tales he weaves together from experience is his glossary of secret agent personality types, who furnish much of the information in this book.

Examples too numerous to mention. Underground chambers in Huntsville, Alabama, where they can reprogram your mind. Willing writes that’s where George Bush II spent most of his time shortly before moving into the White House.

My favorite bomb in the whole book concerns his report on Kay Griggs, the wife of the Marine officer whose exposé of sordid sexual initiations of high-ranking U.S. military officers caused a serious stir a few years back.

Willing writes:

“In addition to the powers of mind control it is almost impossible to think — let alone believe — that the Pentagon military has been and now is under the direction of what some say are mob interests in Brooklyn, N.Y. The discovery and discussion of this reality nearly got Kay Griggs killed. According to her website reports and DVD productions and radio interviews, there are certain elements of the U.S. Marine Corps under direct control of this mob called the JOINT.”

“As a Marine Corps wife, Kay became increasingly concerned about the temperament and well-being of her husband. She tried to help him out of his rage and stress by interesting him in her personal faith and patriotic values. There was a contradiction between what Kay recognized as American and the military assignments of her staff officer husband. Deviant behavior was reported as criteria for advancement and assignment in high military office.”

“Kay said that the military is in the process of creating “mind slaves” controlled by a Pentagon executive of homosexuals. The Marine Corps was a supplier of an assassination unit to kill on behalf of the Brooklyn mob . . .”

“The wives of Marine officers who tried to speak out publicly about personal abuse and government corruption were intimidated to silence. They were dealt with by a rogue element in the Justice Department who “handle people.”

According to Kay, the Pentagon is using false flag attacks against U.S. interests to provoke Americans to war. The driving force of the Pentagon is money laundering, drugs and weapons sales to any markets, she says.

“Because of her role in Norfolk International Chamber of Commerce activities and as president of the NATO wives club in Europe, Kay had access to high officials in military and government, and was able to make herself heard by the press as an authentic source. Just a few days before he died mysteriously, she met with and described the Israeli (JOINT) operation to William Colby, director of the CIA. Colby agreed it was time to expose the Brooklyn (JOINT) mob connection with the Pentagon and Israel.”

“It was no doubt time to publicly revisit the Colby-Bush family connection to the Nugan Hand Bank and the Chinese Hang Send money laundering of Golden Triangle drug moneys during the Vietnam war. It was already known that Georgia on the Black Seas and U.S. State Department and Russian double agents were manipulating elections both foreign and domestic. These activities were all coordinated by the powers of JOINT, she said. It seems like the American Jewish Joint Agricultural Corporation (JOINT) was established as a Jewish relief agency following WW I by the Warburg brothers. The JOINT has had direct links to the Federal Reserve System since its earliest days. the JOINT has evolved and taken new powers and lasting form in the modern Pentagon . . . [end citation]”

Willing later adds: “The Kay Griggs report said that the operations of weapons sales, money laundering and drugs is called “the triangle trade” and is “run by Israel through New York banks.”

But that’s only one of the eye popping vignettes in this book: child snatching, detention camps, mass hypnosis, modifying the behavior of innocent parents, electronically observing the inside of people’s brains according to measured frequencies, aimed at controlling people’s actions by using those certain frequencies . . . “The thoughts of the targeted person become the thoughts programmed by the sender.” . . . holy smokes, there is a lot of really important information in this book that people really need to hear!

Just one more vignette:”

“ . . . it is widely known that behavior control and mass motivation has always been a top priority for governments. That interest has now become more intense, especially since the discovery of the powers of radio, film and TV. The attempt to control public perception for political purposes has a long history. No doubt the origin of this has a connection to religious ideas. However, the mix of religious ideas and modern communications technology when combined in political propaganda are new to modern life. This mix is even more effective when propaganda is buttressed by public opinion polling. With the use of artfully constructed poll questions, the public mind is controlled and made predictable with great accuracy . . .”

“The document before me says the precision of behavior control by semiotic, symbol-based and electronic stimulated and audiovisual modulated propaganda rises from the nature of the polling process itself.”

“It says that contrary to the popular impression about public opinion polls, “Polling is a ‘choice restricting’ mechanism, because ordinary polls reduce and sometimes eliminate entirely . . . the true spectrum of possible options; the possibilities and preference these polls express . . . are ‘guided choices.’ (Cross, Media Speak, p. 180)”

“The manufacture of guided choices makes possible the construction of a ‘controlled opposition.’ This is a political situation where any opposition party or movement remains under the control of the ruling elite. The films of the famous Michael Moore are examples of “controlled opposition.”

“The movie topics by Michael are about real and serious problems of society. They challenge the role of the power elite regarding corporate abuse of power, health care, Wall Street crimes and social hardship.”

“In the broader social context, the films act like a form of pressure relief, a sort of sociological safety valve. For example, once the film is seen, the concerned audience can sense relief because they think and feel that the problem, since it is now discussed in public on film, it is en route for remedy by government powers. This is the classic belief that “once the Führer knows,” bad things will be corrected . . .”

“Currently, there is no capacity in the public psyche to accept the prospect that the elite are not only indifferent to the issues presented in the films, but they have no intention of seeking a remedy. The elites are unmoved because they know that the safety valve function of “controlled opposition” propaganda effectively neutralizes genuine opposition . . .”

Stop me before I hurt myself. This book just keeps getting better.

I have barely scratched the surface of the information in this book.

Notice how I didn’t use the word “Jews” in this story. We wouldn’t want anybody to think we were anti-Semitic, would we? Certainly I couldn’t be talking about ALL Jews, could I? It’s simply ridiculous to think that it could be ALL Jews, is it not? Or is it? This question is the top choice of Jews wanting to distract you from the point you were trying to make.

Or (!) . . . are the wily Brits, as both Willing and Eustace Mullins insist, merely setting up the repulsive Israelis for annihilation, to the cheers of the whole world? Stay tuned. Hopefully the book will come out before the annihilation begins.

Source

Money: The 12th and Final Religion

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Too Late For Trust

By John Kaminski

Why no Jewish writer can be believed

22nd February 2010

NOTICE HOW THEY ALWAYS BLUR THE FOCUS

“I don’t want my data base polluted by their deliberate disinformation.”

Periodically, even the most sincere of my trusty email correspondents send me supposedly revealing pieces about weighty topics of current interest that have been written by Jewish writers.

Some of them are pretty good. In fact, you might say Jews reveal far more about themselves than any gentile investigator can. This is true not only of current news but also of the canons of the genre, the classic insider Jewish warnings by Benjamin Freedman, Harold Rosenthal, Mordecai Vanunu, Arthur Koestler and the like. Perhaps it’s the inside information they have, their history of simply being a Jew all their lives, and apparently seeing life differently than the rest of the people on the planet, but their revelations about their own tribe often appear more realistic than some of the clammy invective thrown at the Jews in general by many of their aggravated gentile critics.

There are two notable features in the category of Jewish-Gentile relations. The first is that gentiles are encouraged every moment of all their lives to feel sorry for Jews, supposedly because these poor people have endured such hard lives throughout all their history. The Holocaust hoopla that began 20 years after World War II has been a public relations campaign to confirm that perception in the minds of everyone in the world, and has worked in spades, due to the ubiquitous power of Jewish media. In many countries today, you can be sent to jail for not feeling sorry for the Jews.

And the shadow of the monster takes form in your mind.

The second feature is, in case you haven’t noticed, Jewish control of practically every government and every major business in the world, and I’m not just talking national governments, but state, local and community bureaucracies and professions as well. Zoning boards. Hospital support groups. All the major corporations. 9/11 skeptics groups.

Notice how they always blur the focus, in every instance. I guess it’s what they’re programmed to do.

So too Jewish writers. Noam Chomsky led a shrinking generation of young American rebels into comprehending the predations of a mad U.S. military, but failed to illuminate the engine of the beast, which was and is of course the center of Jewish money, which is not so coincidentally the center of the world’s money.

Israel, Chomsky once said, is just another country, one of the world’s great understatements that totally evaporates Chomsky’s cachet as a philosopher. But that didn’t top his Jewish cohort Howard Zinn’s infamous line just before he died: “Who did 9/11 doesn’t matter.” Spoken like a Jew, Howard.

I’m guessing their success is an indicator of how unconscious most Americans are, whose minds are shaped by media — at every age and every level — owned by Jews, sending the profitmaking screw-your-neighbor philosophy throughout the world at warp speed.

How this Jewish money was accumulated that enables a small group of rich Jews to determine the fate of the world is the tale.

And now this tale — a totally fabricated reality that makes us cheer our troops in Afghanistan as they gather up young boys for future use by Neocons and others of that stripe — is going to be sorted out for you by Jewish writers, who may rail against the obvious debaucheries by Israelis spouting sacred nonsense, but never — not in a single instance — do they shine their supposedly penetrating reportorial light on the real heart of the beast.

Which is their cursed clan.

They have to lie to you in order to appear like normal human beings. If they really behaved as they wished to behave, and as they have been taught to behave in synagogues, you’d either be dead or getting them coffee.

And that’s the way it’s been for thousands of years, the real deal, as they say.

To defend Judaism is to admit you are a criminal, sworn to take the lives of others simply because you have declared that you can.

This in my opinion is not a human being. Jews are fond of claiming they are the Chosen, but are so embarrassed to admit that their vaunted holy book contains orders to kill or enslave all the non-Jews of the world that they will tell any lie to keep you from knowing it.

Is this something a healthy parent would ever want to teach his children? No, no healthy parent.

And so we get to the nub of the secret all Jewish writers try to keep, even though they may brandish tantalizing tidbits of the most insane conspiracy of all time — that only one ancient tribe is holy, and it deserves the whole world filled with a small number of others who will be allowed to serve them.

Signs of the Times

Their own science — psychology — defines this as narcissistic homicidal megalomania. And we read The New York Times, the quintessential Jewish media outlet, and think we are properly informed.

This eulogy began as a letter to Dirk Chardet, a nice young man who puts together a compelling new digest with many of the latest breaking stories from around the real world. A majority of his forwards are by lately popular Jewish writers such as the trenchant Israeli critic Gilad Atzmon, and I am writing specifically to ask not to be included in his digest, because I don’t want to associate with Jewish writers, simply because they can’t and don’t tell the truth, in all instances.

They give you a tantalizing part of the truth, but their ingrained ulterior motive always makes them hold something back. I call it the Alex Jones Formula, where he fries up 95 percent of the truth, and then discombobulates into vague nonsense about the mysterious Illuminati. People love it. Most people I know think he’s really working for us.

Plus, there is the biggest reason of all.

Three thousand years of Jewish lies have gotten us where we are today. Why would I want a Jew to try to tell me how to get out of the fix Jews have put us in? No normally functioning human being would make that choice.

How many more Jews posing as something other than a Jew will I have to listen to in this lifetime?

This warning especially applies to those Jews like Henry Makow and Brother Nathanael who have converted to Christianity. It’s like a waltz. Christianity was invented by a Jew. They titillate you with revelations and insights into esoteric adventures, but the heart of the beast remains intact, feeding on itself, unwilling to reveal the basic mind control crime of all the monotheisms but in particular the nastiest one of all, the Talmud, which is nothing but a license to murder anyone you like and then lie about it.

And that’s what they do.

Jewish writers don’t write about that. They write about petitioning our congresspeople, and I want to wretch, because our congresspeople, each and every one, is guilty of multiple counts of treason, accessory to mass murder and . . . obstruction of justice has become a way of life in Jewish America.

I have always considered my writing to be independent of any group or label. I happen to be one of the few former lefties around who actually saw through the Jewish mindlock, and once you do, reality changes. We are being totally manipulated. It’s time to wake up.

Jewish writers aren’t going to tell us how to do that. They’re going to tell us about some interesting issue that is going to capture our attention so that we will devote our time to it and ultimately not see what it was we were looking for. We have our objectives changed when they are passed through a Jewish filter.

That’s what Eustace Mullins meant when he said, “Because of the presence of the Jew, you will not achieve your dreams.”

Jewish writers inevitably blur and twist the contours of any argument to invariably shape it into advantage for only themselves. I don’t want to be saddled with that taint. Think of the Boer War, where Brits and Dutch died in droves but the Jews wound up with all the diamond mines. That’s what happens every time.

And I don’t want to read political stories written by Jews and have to sort out the bias by which the story is always twisted to favor the Jews. I don’t want my data base polluted by this deliberate disinformation.

If Jews want to do stories on their own depredations, they should focus on Untermeyer who bought Woodrow Wilson and destroyed the American republic, or how Jewish robots like Foxman and Dershowitz have actually destroyed much of American history with their psychotic hatemongering. Or maybe how the concept of cannibalism relates to how they regard themselves.

Jewish New Agers should weigh in on what human properties, what human connections to God and the universe, are cut off by the Jewish practice of circumcision, and why does Judaism so desire to deface everything it touches?

Most importantly, I’d like to hear stories by Jews focusing on how they are going to decertify the Jewish power kings, and work for an equitable world, rather the fetid plantation they have created. Or how they have overcome the xenophobia they inflict upon the world.

We are so far behind comprehending what Jews have done to us, it would be absolutely ridiculous for me to ever trust anything said by a Jew about any topic.

Did you hear that Israel now has a fleet of 747 jumbo jet drones that can deliver any number of its 1200 nuclear warheads anywhere on Earth?

The Jews are the Chosen all right, chosen to lead us straight to hell. You know how you can tell. We’re already there. Look at the label.

It’s all around you.

Look at the hoaxes they have perpetrated upon us.

Osama bin Laden. Saddam Hussein. Swine flu. Atomic energy. Fluoride. Fair elections. AIDS. The Federal Reserve. The income tax. The Civil War. You know the list. Good music. Gardasil. It’s 360 degree attempted murder, as far as I can see.

Eustace Mullins told me this tale twice, several years apart. When he lived in Washington D.C. and was regularly visiting the imprisoned poet Ezra Pound, he also lunched regularly with the legendary Benjamin Freedman, whom, Mullins noted, was an executive of the notorious Anti-Defamation League, one of the many Jewish gestapo groups.

When I expressed to Mullins that it seemed that Freedman, for all his seemingly enlightened invective, was merely putting us on to prove that Jews could appear to be human, Mullins looked at me, shrugged his shoulders and raised one eyebrow.

So now you know why I never want to be grouped with (and seldom want to even read) Jewish writers, because it’s guaranteed you’ll get the wrong story, and, worse, the data base by which you make all the decisions that affect your life will be polluted by deliberately false information. Often, the effects of that disinfo are irreversible.

Source

Child Slavery Alive and Well in Haiti

How Haiti’s Quarter Million Slaves Will Survive The Quake

Photo credit: Lucas the Experience

By Amanda Kloer

What has been a slow crisis of poverty and enslavement for almost 250,000 child slaves in Haiti, known as restaveks, turned into an immediate crisis this week with the brutal 7.0 earthquake that hit the country. Mere hours after the news of the devastation in Haiti broke, America and countries around the world saw an outpouring of aid from international organizations and individuals. Groups have organized drives for everything from donations to shoes to volunteers.

But as we all get that warm and fuzzy feeling from helping our neighbors in their time of great need, it’s important to remember that millions of Haitians needed aid before this earthquake, and they’ll continue to need it long after the media fervor has died. And those with the greatest need will be the enslaved restaveks.

Restaveks are a huge part of Haitian society and the economy. They are usually children from extremely poor families who are sent away to work as domestic servants in wealthier homes. The children aren’t paid for their work, but provided shelter and a sometimes meager meal supply. In the best case scenarios, families will send their restavek children to school. But restaveks often work long days performing a variety of household tasks for nothing more that a meal or two a day. Two-thirds of restaveks are girls, and they are extremely vulnerable to rape and sexual abuse from the families who house and control them. The life of a restavek child in Haiti often varies between bleak and hopeless, and many children never successfully leave their slave conditions.

Restaveks are also the least likely to benefit from the tide of international aid washing onto Haiti’s shores, though they might be the ones most in need of it. A restavek’s hunger and wounds take a distant backseat to those of their employer. And some restaveks are not officially registered with the Haitian government as people.

While it’s impossible to predict the exact long-term effects of a natural disaster of this magnitude on a country where the poverty is so immense and the enslavement of millions of children is a common and socially-accepted part of life, I feel comfortable predicting that even more children will become restaveks. And while life will get significantly harder for everyone, restaveks will be hit the worst.

If you’re interested in helping the people of Haiti, Change.org’s Michael Jones lists some great resources where you can donate, and in some cases volunteer, to help relief efforts. In addition, I’d like to add a couple resources that will directly aid the restavek population of Haiti, including The Restavek Foundation and Free the Slaves, which works in Haiti.

But as you donate money, feel empathetic, and think about ways to help Haiti this week, remember that long after the buildings are rebuilt, Haiti will still be a country built on the slavery of children. And for the restaveks, every day they are not free is another disaster.

Source

From 2007

Murkiness overshadows Haiti’s future, children being used as ‘Restaveks’

haitian children salvery

Haiti children collecting water

We believe-’Children are God’s gifts’, however, the irony is they are not treated the same everywhere. Slavery system which has been abolished (or so we think) centuries ago, we can still find hundreds of examples of bonded slavery till now. What we consider as a free society still witnesses slavery in the worst of its form, the most ridiculous being ‘child slavery’. Liberty, equality, social justice-these words do exist but they still haven’t touched the lives of many Haitian children.

Here is a heart melting story of a Haitian child named Evans Antoine, the boy who wakes up at 7 a.m., just to face another torturous day. He is made to sleep on a dusty floor, like many of us he doesn’t have warm, puffy, quilted beds. He washes dishes; cleans up whole of the house, run errands all day long and also works under burning sun. Still, he has neither money, nor the privilege to attend school like other children of his age. Except for a dirty floor to sleep, a broken roof to hide him and food which is usually the left over, he gets nothing. The tragic story of his life that he has been living since past three years doesn’t end here. He gets a few things in return of his toil and they are; beatings, abuses and punishments. As Antoine puts it,

They tell me that I’m useless. They yell at me and tell me about all the things they do for me and how easy I have it.

Children as ‘Restaveks’

Restavek is actually a Haitian term, which was derived from the French word meaning to ’stay with.’ However, as per the Haitians the phrase doesn’t just mean to stay with someone but is conferred as ‘one who lives with people’. It doesn’t matter if the stay is forced upon someone because of the culture, which sees Restavek as a tradition. As per statistics, Evans is not alone; there are other 300,000 children, out of which ten percent are under 18 years of age, who serve as domestics for other families even if that is a forced servitude.

Restaveks the practice which started most probably with the mixed-race children on the plantation mansions has been able to survive and seep into the twentieth century. Haiti, which is one of the most impoverished nations in the world has also not resented against the tradition of restaveks as the families in the economy can not afford to feed their children. Thus, they seek the ridiculous tradition as the only way out. Girls especially are prone to a more torturous life. Where male children are used physically, girls end up being sexually harassed. It is quite ironical that the nation which was the first one to outlaw slavery has continued with the worst form of slavery.

A few hardcore facts

� The nation supports a population of 8.7 million and is suffering pangs poverty and lawlessness.
� Haiti is the poorest country in the Western hemisphere.
� As per UNICEF, less then 2% of children are able to finish secondary education.
� Just half of the primary school children are enrolled in schools for further education.
� Most of the restaveks are those children, who are willingly given up by their parents for money mostly. Antoine’s case is an example of what so often goes wrong.

The veiled truth

Usually host families are promised that their children will be educated, fed properly and taken proper care of. Parents in want of better future for their children agree to send them. However, most of the families don’t keep their promises. In fact, the families who adopt these children are just a little bit well off in comparison to the host families. As Guerda Constante, a child-rights activist quotes, ‘It is not in Haitian culture to send children away. Parents do this because they do not have the means to provide for their needs. It seems strange, but the parents are acting with love.’

A ray of HOPE

After the circulation of the news about the depressing situation of Haiti children, one American school has decided to set up a sister-school relationship with those in Fond des Blancs. The school named Seth Boyden Elementary school is situated in Maplewood, N.J. Also, NGOs and private aid agencies such as the Maurice Sixto Home in Port-au-Prince do a lot by educating and feeding restaveks.

The challenge

The biggest challenge that we face in an effort to eradicate restavek system from its roots is that it has soaked into the very psychology and mentality of the Haitian people. The system has been accepted thoroughly, thus making it a part of the community and culture. Restaveks are hardly discovered as people don’t complain about abuses or harassment. The child laws when and if are taken into account they just lead to the release of the children without a shelter to live in. This makes them more vulnerable to drugs, illegal activities, sufferings and even diseases like HIV.

What the nation and the people need is an awareness, an intervention into their affairs through means like education, implementation of stricter laws, social interaction, earning means and a better economical state of affairs. Until and unless, we don’t work and aware Haitian people of the deteriorating affect that the tradition is having on the society, Haiti’s future will remain in shadows and without a light to look forward to.

Source: MSNbc

Image credit: FCCMI

PW Source

Pentagon Continues To Hide US Afghan War Losses

FACTS ON THE GROUND

Dear Jeff,

The American casualty figure is quite high, but they lie about it.

For example, if you remember a few weeks back the corporate media reported that a translator shot dead two US soldiers in Maidan-Wardak province. The truth was otherwise.

The US forces went to a village and searched houses. They were no men in the houses, so the Americans pulled the women out. The Afghan women yelled at the Afghan Army puppets, “why don’t you remove us from our houses instead of these “infidels”? You are not men or Afghans!”

Once the the Afghan army soldiers heard this, their commander ordered the troops to open fire on the Americans. There were 100 Afghan soldiers. They shot 25 American soldiers dead and many were wounded. The soldiers fought against the US troops from 2 am to 10 AM the next morning until the US airplanes bombed the soldiers positions and killed four of the Afghan troops.

The remaining soldiers and their commander retreated to the mountains and joined the Taliban.  The Afghan translator also opened fire on the Afghan soldiers and they shot him back.

Dr. Mohammad Miraki

So, this is a glimpse into the facts hidden by the government. The person telling about the US casualties of 25 soldiers killed in Maidan-Wardak province visited the site of the fighting.

In Marjah, as well, 15,000 troops are fighting against only 300 fighters, yet they were brought to their knees.

One more thing…since that incident, there has been a steady stream of Afghan policemen and soldiers joining the resistance in Maidan-Wardak Province.

Dr. Mohammed Miraki

Source


Young Boys Sexually Enslaved in Afghanistan

A 15-year-old bacha bazi, or ‘dancing boy’, performs before a large group of men.

Sexual slavery involving boys as young as 10 is being condoned and in many cases protected by authorities in northern Afghanistan.

In a story to be broadcast on Four Corners tonight, the practice of bacha bazi or “boy play”, as well as other allegations of child abuse, are explored.

Afghan journalist Najibullah Quraishi has filmed police attending a party where a young boy is the “entertainment”. The police shown on the video include one officer from the youth crime squad.

Such parties are illegal under the law in Afghanistan and with good reason. The “dancing boys” are in effect sex slaves. They are lured off the streets by pimps. They are taught to dance and sing, to wear make-up and to dress like girls. Then they are made to perform before large groups of men. All of them are sexually abused.

“Dancing boys” are a lucrative business. Powerful former warlords and businessmen love to watch them and will pay a lot of money to have their own boy for bacha bazi. Some of the boys are traded like swap cards amongst the rich and powerful and if they disobey their “owners” they are killed or brutalised.

The trade in boys is well known to the United Nations. According to Nazir Alimy, who compiled a report on the issue for the UN, there is no doubt who is funding this practice and why the police refuse to stop it.

“According to our research these dancing boys are used by powerful men for sex,” Mr Alimy said.

Tonight’s Four Corners follows the criminal activity of two paedophiles who search for young boys so they can sell them or groom them to be trained as “dancing boys”. In one case the journalist goes in the car with a paedophile named Dastager. As they drive, Dastager explains the type of boy he is looking for. Then in broad daylight the “dancing boy master” stops the car, goes to a shopfront and brings a boy back to his the waiting car.

According to a report prepared for the United Nations there is evidence that the practice of bacha bazi and the sexual abuse of boys is common throughout the north of the country. It confirms that young boys, some of them only 10 years old, are lured into life as a sex slave.

There is also evidence that this type of abuse is spreading throughout Afghanistan.

Mr Alimy says his research shows it is happening in the south and even in the Afghan capital, Kabul.

“It’s true they make the boys wear girls’ clothes and make them dance in front of many men,” he said.

The powerful men he refers to are often former warlords who helped drive the Taliban out of the north. Others who involve themselves in the trade of boys are wealthy businessmen. Under the Taliban, bacha bazi was outlawed. Today it is still a crime but clearly there is no concerted effort being made to stop the practice and the criminal activity that surrounds it.

Unable to find anyone willing to do anything about the abuse of children, journalist Najibullah Quraishi flew to New York to meet Radhika Coomaraswamy, who has been appointed by the UN to raise awareness of the plight of children in war zones.

She explains she is deeply pessimistic about the future of these children and the capacity of officials to stop the trade in young boys.

“When I mentioned the topic it was as if I had dropped a big brick, especially in the circles, official circles,” she said.

“It was very clear to me, and someone actually said it to me, these are not things people talk about. So let’s first deal with the war and then we’ll deal with these other issues.”

The Warlord’s Tune goes to air tonight at 8.30 PM on ABC 1.

This homosexual pedophilia is an extension of the Pashtun warrior mentality of inflicting the most humiliating form of abuse possible upon your enemies.  From the book Charlie Wilson’s War, we learn that the practice became a form of torture, where captured Soviet soldiers were ritualistically raped to death as an example to those who came later.   The book and movie also mentioned a popular saying at CIA that the most suitable Pashtun sexual partner was another Pashtun man.

Source

Israel’s new strategy: “sabotage” and “attack” the global justice movement

An extraordinary series of articles, reports and presentations by Israel’s influential Reut Institute has identified the global movement for justice, equality and peace as an “existential threat” to Israel and called on the Israeli government to direct substantial resources to “attack” and possibly engage in criminal “sabotage” of this movement in what Reut believes are its various international “hubs” in London, Madrid, Toronto, the San Francisco Bay Area and beyond.

The Reut Institute’s analyses hold that Israel’s traditional strategic doctrine — which views threats to the state’s existence in primarily military terms, to be met with a military response — is badly out of date. Rather, what Israel faces today is a combined threat from a “Resistance Network” and a “Delegitimization Network.”

The Resistance Network is comprised of political and armed groups such as Hamas and Hizballah who “rel[y] on military means to sabotage every move directed at affecting separation between Israel and the Palestinians or securing a two-state solution” (“The Delegitimization Challenge: Creating a Political Firewall, Reut Institute, 14 February 2010).

Furthermore, the “Resistance Network” allegedly aims to cause Israel’s political “implosion” — a la South Africa, East Germany or the Soviet Union — rather than bring about military defeat through direct confrontation on the battlefield.

The “Delegitimization Network” — which Reut Institute president and former Israeli government advisor Gidi Grinstein provocatively claims is in an “unholy alliance” with the Resistance Network — is made up of the broad, decentralized and informal movement of peace and justice, human rights, and BDS (boycott, divestment and sanctions) activists all over the world. Its manifestations include protests against Israeli officials visiting universities, Israeli Apartheid Week, faith-based and trade union-based activism, and “lawfare” — the use of universal jurisdiction to bring legal accountability for alleged Israeli war criminals. The Reut Institute even cited my speech to the student conference on BDS held at Hampshire College last November as a guide to how the “delegitimization” strategy supposedly works (“Eroding Israel’s Legitimacy in the International Arena,” Reut Institute, 28 January 2010).

The combined “attack” from “resisters” and “delegitimizers,” Reut says, “possesses strategic significance, and may develop into a comprehensive existential threat within a few years.” It further warns that a “harbinger of such a threat would be the collapse of the two-state solution as an agreed framework for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the coalescence behind a ‘one-state solution’ as a new alternative framework.”

At a basic level, Reut’s analysis represents an advance over the most primitive and hitherto dominant layers of Israeli strategic thinking; it reflects an understanding, as I put it in my speech at Hampshire, that “Zionism simply cannot bomb, kidnap, assassinate, expel, demolish, settle and lie its way to legitimacy and acceptance.”

But underlying the Reut Institute’s analysis is a complete inability to disentangle cause and effect. It seems to assume that the dramatic erosion in Israel’s international standing since its wars on Lebanon in 2006 and Gaza in 2009 is a result of the prowess of the “delegitimization network” to which it imputes wholly nefarious, devious and unwholesome goals — effectively the “destruction of Israel.”

It blames “delegitimizers” and “resisters” for frustrating the two-state solution but ignores Israel’s relentless and ongoing settlement-building drive — supported by virtually every state organ — calculated and intended to make Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank impossible.

It never considers for a moment that the mounting criticism of Israel’s actions might be justified, or that the growing ranks of people ready to commit their time and efforts to opposing Israel’s actions are motivated by genuine outrage and a desire to see justice, equality and an end to bloodshed. In other words, Israel is delegitimizing itself.

Reut does not recommend to the Israeli cabinet — which recently held a special session to hear a presentation of the think tank’s findings — that Israel should actually change its behavior toward Palestinians and Lebanese. It misses the point that apartheid South Africa also once faced a global “delegitimization network” but that this has now completely disappeared. South Africa, however, still exists. Once the cause motivating the movement disappeared — the rank injustice of formal apartheid — people packed up their signs and their BDS campaigns and went home.

Instead, Reut recommends to the Israeli government an aggressive and possibly criminal counter-offensive. A powerpoint presentation Grinstein made to the recent Herzliya Conference on Israeli national security actually calls on Israel’s “intelligence agencies to focus” on the named and unnamed “hubs” of the “delegitimization network” and to engage in “attacking catalysts” of this network. In its “The Delegitimization Challenge: Creating a Political Firewall” document, Reut recommends that “Israel should sabotage network catalysts.”

A Reut Institute presentation calls on Israel to "attack catalysts" -- global peace and justice activists.

The use of the word “sabotage” is particularly striking and should draw the attention of governments, law enforcement agencies and university officials concerned about the safety and welfare of their students and citizens. The only definition of “sabotage” in United States law deems it to be an act of war on a par with treason, when carried out against the United States. In addition, in common usage, the American Heritage Dictionary defines sabotage as “Treacherous action to defeat or hinder a cause or an endeavor; deliberate subversion.” It is difficult to think of a legitimate use of this term in a political or advocacy context.

At the very least, Reut seems to be calling for Israel’s spy agencies to engage in covert activity to interfere with the exercise of legal free speech, association and advocacy rights in the United States, Canada and European Union countries, and possibly to cause harm to individuals and organizations. These warnings of Israel’s possible intent — especially in light of its long history of criminal activity on foreign soil — should not be taken lightly.

The Reut Institute, based in Tel Aviv, raises a significant amount of tax-exempt funds in the United States through a nonprofit arm called American Friends of the Reut Institute (AFRI). According to its public filings, AFRI sent almost $2 million to the Reut Institute in 2006 and 2007.

In addition to a state-sponsored international “sabotage” campaign, Reut also recommends a “soft” policy. This specifically involves better hasbara or state propaganda to greenwash Israel as a high-tech haven for environmental technologies and high culture — what it terms “Brand Israel.”

Other elements include “maintain[ing] thousands of personal relationships with political, cultural, media and security-related elites and influentials” around the world, and “harnessing Jewish and Israeli diaspora communities” even more tightly to its cause. It even emphasizes that Israel should use “international aid” to boost its image (its perfunctory foray into earthquake-devastated Haiti was an example of this tactic).

What ties together all these strategies is that they are aimed at frustrating, delaying and distracting attention from the fundamental issue: that Israel — despite its claims to be a liberal and democratic state — is an ultranationalist ethnocracy that relies on the violent suppression of the most fundamental rights of millions of Palestinians, soon to be a demographic majority, to maintain the status quo. There is no “game changer” in Reut’s new strategy.

Reut is apparently unaware even of the irony of trying to reform “Brand Israel” as something cuddly, while at the same time publicly recommending that Israel’s notorious spies “sabotage” peace groups on foreign soil.

But there are two lessons we must heed: Reut’s analysis vindicates the effectiveness of the BDS strategy, and as Israeli elites increasingly fear for the long-term prospects of the Zionist project they are likely to be more ruthless, unscrupulous and desperate than ever.

Ali Abunimah is co-founder of The Electronic Intifada and author of One Country: A Bold Proposal to End the Israeli-Palestinian Impasse.

Source

Related:

The Delegitimization Challenge: Creating a Political Firewall


Mossad’s Murderous Reach: The Larger Political Issues

By James Petras

By Way of Deception

On January 19 Israel’s international secret police, the Mossad, sent an eighteen member death squad to  Dubai using European passports, supposedly ‘stolen’ from Israeli dual citizens and altered with fake photos and signatures, in order to assassinate the Palestinian leader, Mahmoud al Mabhouh.

The evidence is overwhelming: The Dubai police presentation of detailed security videos of the assassins was corroborated by the testimony of Israeli security experts and applauded by Israel’s leading newspapers and columnists.  The Mossad openly stated that Mabhouh was a high priority target who had survived three previous assassination attempts.  Israel did not even bother to deny the murder.  Furthermore, the sophisticated communication system used by the killers, the logistics and planning surrounding their entry and exit from Dubai and the scope and scale of the operation have all the characteristics of a high-level state operation.  Furthermore, only Mossad would have access to the European passports of its dual citizens!  Only Mossad would have the capacity, motivation, stated intent and willingness to provoke a diplomatic row with its European allies, knowing full well that Western European governments’ anger would blow over because of their deep links to Israel.  After meticulous investigation and the interrogation of 2 captured Palestinian Mossad collaborators, the Dubai police chief has stated he is sure the Mossad was behind the killing.

The Larger Political Issues

Israel’s policy of overseas assassination raises profound issues that threaten the basis of the modern state:  sovereignty, rule of law and national and personal security.

Israel has a publicly-stated policy of violating the sovereignty of any and all countries in order to kill or abduct its opponents.  In both proclamation and actual practice, Israeli law, decrees and actions abroad supersede the laws and law enforcement agencies of any other nation. If Israel’s policy becomes the common practice world-wide, we would enter a savage Hobbesian jungle in which individuals would be subject to the murderous intent of foreign assassination squads unrestrained by any law or accountable national authority.  Each and every state could impose its own laws and cross national borders in order to murder other nation’s citizens or residents with impunity.  Israel’s extra-territorial assassinations make a mockery of the very notion of national sovereignty.  Extra-territorial secret police elimination of opponents was a common practice of the Nazi Gestapo, Stalin’s GPU and Pinochet’s DINA and has now become the sanctioned practice of the US “Special Forces” and the CIA clandestine division.  Such policies are the hallmark of totalitarian, dictatorial and imperialist states, which systematically trample on the sovereign rights of peoples.

Israel’s practice of extra-judicial, extra-territorial assassinations, exemplified by the recent murder of Mahmoud al Mabhouh in a Dubai hotel room, violates all the fundamental precepts of the rule of law.  Extra-judicial killings ordered by a state, mean its own secret police are judge, jury, prosecutor and executioner, unrestrained by sovereignty, law and the duty of nations to protect their citizens and visitors.  Evidence, legal procedures, defense and cross examinations are obliterated in the process.  State-sponsored, extra-judicial murder completely undermines due process.  Liquidation of opponents abroad is the logical next step after Israel’s domestic show trials, based on the application of its racial laws and administrative detention decrees, which have dispossessed the Palestinian people and violated international laws.

Mossad death squads operate directly under the Israeli Prime Minister (who personally approved the recent murder).The vast  majority of Israelis proudly support these assassinations, especially when the killers escape detection and capture.  The unfettered operation of foreign state-sponsored death squads, carrying out extra-judicial assassinations with impunity, is a serious threat to every critic, writer, political leader and civic activist who dares to criticize Israel.

Mossad Murders -  Zionist Fire

The precedent of Israel killing its adversaries abroad, establishes the outer boundaries of repression by its overseas supporters in the leading Zionist organizations, most of whom have now and in the past supported Israel’s violation of national sovereignty via extra-judicial killings.  If Israel physically eliminates its opponents and critics, the 51 major American Jewish organizations economically repress Israel’s critics in the US.  They actively pressure employers, university presidents and public officials to fire employees, academics and professionals who dare to speak or write against Israeli torture, killing and systematic dispossession of Palestinians.

So far, most critical comments, in Israel and elsewhere, of Mossad’s recent murder in Dubai focus on the agents’ “incompetence”, including allowing their faces to be captured on numerous security videos as they clumsily changed their wigs and costumes under the camera gaze .  Other critics complain that the bungling Mossad is “tarnishing Israel’s image” as a democratic state and providing ammunition for the anti-Semites.  None of these superficial criticisms have been repeated by the US Congress, White House or the Presidents of the Major Jewish American organizations, where the mafia rule of Omerga, or silence, reigns supreme and criminal complicity is the rule

Conclusion

While the critics bemoan the clumsy Mossad job, making it harder for Western powers to provide Israel with diplomatic cover for its operations abroad, the fundamental issue is never addressed: The Mossad’s acquisition and alteration of official British, French, German and Irish passports of dual Israeli citizen’s underscores the cynical and sinister nature of Israel’s exploitation of its dual citizens in the pursuit of its own bloody foreign policy goals.  Mossad’s use of genuine passports issued by four sovereign European nations to its citizens in order to murder a Palestinian in a Dubai hotel room raises the question of to whom ‘dual’ Israeli citizens really owe their allegiance and just how far they are willing to go in defending or promoting Israel’s overseas assassinations.

Thanks to Israel’s use of British passports to enter Dubai and murder an adversary, every British businessperson or tourist traveling in the Middle East will be suspected of links to Israeli death squads.  With elections this year and the Labor and Conservative parties counting heavenly on Zionist millionaires for campaign funding, it remains to be seen whether Prime Minister Gordon Brown will do more than whimper and cringe!

Source

The “Real” President of the United States

THE AXELROD PRESIDENCY

It is safe to say that the U.S. government today is a far cry from what the framers of the Constitution intended.  Congress has lost its control over our currency and completely abdicated its role as the only branch that can declare war.  These powers now belong to the president, directly or indirectly.  The executive branch has gained immense power at the expense of the legislative branch, our representatives in Congress.  The result is that our presidents have much more power than envisioned by the Founding Fathers.  The real power of the U.S. government is centralized in the person of the president, who has more power than a king or czar.  To control the United States one need only control the president.  The president is controlled by the people around him, his chief of staff and senior advisors.  This is why it is essential to understand who advises the president because these are the people who shape the policies of the White House.

To understand the Obama presidency one needs to know the people who made Barack Obama president.  Chief among the people behind the Obama presidency is David Axelrod, Obama’s friend, senior advisor, and chief media and political strategist.  If one were to look behind the televised images of Barack Obama, one would find David Axelrod writing the speeches and creating the image of the candidate and the president.  While Barack Obama is the face of the current administration, the policies, words, and images are creations of David Axelrod.  So overwhelming is his influence on the White House that it would be fair to call this the Axelrod Presidency.


David Axelrod is the man who explains the Obama administration to the world.


Axelrod is Obama’s right-hand man and is always at his side.


Axelrod goes everywhere Obama goes…


Axelrod writes Obama’s speeches…


and coaches him on how to present them, as he has since 1992.


Axelrod has been with Obama as his adviser and chief strategist every step of the way, creating and shaping the candidate who became president after a short career as a politician from Chicago.


Looking at the Obama White House from outside, one might get the impression that David Axelrod is the real president and Obama is his spokesman.

WHO IS DAVID AXELROD?

The most peculiar thing about David Axelrod is that although he is clearly one of the most powerful men in the government of the United States, for most Americans he remains an unknown factor.  The controlled media does nothing to help us understand who Axelrod is.  How can that be?  How is it that Axelrod represents the executive branch of the U.S. government on television and speaks to the media daily about the policies of the U.S. government and nobody cares to explain who this person is and how he became senior advisor to President Obama?  Who is this senior political advisor to the president who said, quite incorrectly, in June 2009 that Iran had nuclear weapons – on national television?  Who is Axelrod to say that Iran will face consequences for failing to submit to the extra-judicial dictates of the so-called “international community,” as he did at the end of 2009?

David Axelrod is a Chicago-based media consultant, advertising man, and corporate lobbyist who makes his living by changing public opinion to support his clients, who are primarily political candidates and major corporations.  Axelrod is really a paid lobbyist who uses television advertising to change public opinion on behalf of his clients.  Because he has two kinds of clients – political candidates and large corporations – Axelrod started two media companies: AKP&D Message and Media for politicians, and ASK Public Strategies for corporations.  While all partners at AKP&D (A is for Axelrod, with John Kupper, David Plouffe, and John Del Cecato) held senior positions on the Obama campaign, it wasn’t the only campaign AKP&D worked on.  AKP&D also provided services to the presidential campaigns of John Edwards and Hillary Clinton.

Creating a positive image to affect public opinion through television ads is one of the basic services Axelrod provides.  To do this he writes most of their speeches.  Because he has so many politicians as clients, sometimes he re-uses the same speech.  When Obama the candidate used the same speech that Deval Patrick or John Edwards had used earlier, it wasn’t plagerism – it was simply Obama reading a recycled Axelrod speech.

David Axelrod is described on the White House website as the former ”Senior Partner” at AKP&D, who “managed media strategy and communications for more than 150 local, state, and national campaigns, with a focus on progressive candidates and causes.”

SourceWatch has information about David Axelrod and his media companies.  As a former resident of Cook County who was born and raised in the Chicago area, I can say that the people who Axelrod has helped put into office in Illinois and Chicago are anything but “progressive.”  Having monitored elections in Cook County, I can say with a high degree of certainty that the Chicago-based political figures that Axelrod has worked with are actually part of a large criminal enterprise.

Why would David Axelrod be involved in promoting candidates who are so easily corrupted?  Why is a son of Romanian Jewish immigrants working to promote black candidates in cities and states across the country?  Who tells Axelrod who to support and what policies to promote?

to be continued…

Sources and Recommended Reading:

“Obama’s Credibility Gap” by Bob Herbert, New York Times, January 25, 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/26/opinion/26herbert.html

Source

The “New” Poor

Millions of Unemployed Face Years Without Jobs

The face of the "new" poor

BUENA PARK, Calif. — Even as the American economy shows tentative signs of a rebound, the human toll of the recession continues to mount, with millions of Americans remaining out of work, out of savings and nearing the end of their unemployment benefits.

Economists fear that the nascent recovery will leave more people behind than in past recessions, failing to create jobs in sufficient numbers to absorb the record-setting ranks of the long-term unemployed.

Call them the new poor: people long accustomed to the comforts of middle-class life who are now relying on public assistance for the first time in their lives — potentially for years to come.

Yet the social safety net is already showing severe strains. Roughly 2.7 million jobless people will lose their unemployment check before the end of April unless Congress approves the Obama administration’s proposal to extend the payments, according to the Labor Department.

Here in Southern California, Jean Eisen has been without work since she lost her job selling beauty salon equipment more than two years ago. In the several months she has endured with neither a paycheck nor an unemployment check, she has relied on local food banks for her groceries.

She has learned to live without the prescription medications she is supposed to take for high blood pressure and cholesterol. She has become effusively religious — an unexpected turn for this onetime standup comic with X-rated material — finding in Christianity her only form of health insurance.

“I pray for healing,” says Ms. Eisen, 57. “When you’ve got nothing, you’ve got to go with what you know.”

Warm, outgoing and prone to the positive, Ms. Eisen has worked much of her life. Now, she is one of 6.3 million Americans who have been unemployed for six months or longer, the largest number since the government began keeping track in 1948. That is more than double the toll in the next-worst period, in the early 1980s.

Men have suffered the largest numbers of job losses in this recession. But Ms. Eisen has the unfortunate distinction of being among a group — women from 45 to 64 years of age — whose long-term unemployment rate has grown rapidly.

In 1983, after a deep recession, women in that range made up only 7 percent of those who had been out of work for six months or longer, according to the Labor Department. Last year, they made up 14 percent.

Twice, Ms. Eisen exhausted her unemployment benefits before her check was restored by a federal extension. Last week, her check ran out again. She and her husband now settle their bills with only his $1,595 monthly disability check. The rent on their apartment is $1,380.

“We’re looking at the very real possibility of being homeless,” she said.

Every downturn pushes some people out of the middle class before the economy resumes expanding. Most recover. Many prosper. But some economists worry that this time could be different. An unusual constellation of forces — some embedded in the modern-day economy, others unique to this wrenching recession — might make it especially difficult for those out of work to find their way back to their middle-class lives.

Labor experts say the economy needs 100,000 new jobs a month just to absorb entrants to the labor force. With more than 15 million people officially jobless, even a vigorous recovery is likely to leave an enormous number out of work for years.

Some labor experts note that severe economic downturns are generally followed by powerful expansions, suggesting that aggressive hiring will soon resume. But doubts remain about whether such hiring can last long enough to absorb anywhere close to the millions of unemployed.

A New Scarcity of Jobs

Some labor experts say the basic functioning of the American economy has changed in ways that make jobs scarce — particularly for older, less-educated people like Ms. Eisen, who has only a high school diploma.

Large companies are increasingly owned by institutional investors who crave swift profits, a feat often achieved by cutting payroll. The declining influence of unions has made it easier for employers to shift work to part-time and temporary employees. Factory work and even white-collar jobs have moved in recent years to low-cost countries in Asia and Latin America. Automation has helped manufacturing cut 5.6 million jobs since 2000 — the sort of jobs that once provided lower-skilled workers with middle-class paychecks.

“American business is about maximizing shareholder value,” said Allen Sinai, chief global economist at the research firm Decision Economics. “You basically don’t want workers. You hire less, and you try to find capital equipment to replace them.”

During periods of American economic expansion in the 1950s, ’60s and ’70s, the number of private-sector jobs increased about 3.5 percent a year, according to an analysis of Labor Department data by Lakshman Achuthan, managing director of the Economic Cycle Research Institute, a research firm. During expansions in the 1980s and ’90s, jobs grew just 2.4 percent annually. And during the last decade, job growth fell to 0.9 percent annually.

“The pace of job growth has been getting weaker in each expansion,” Mr. Achuthan said. “There is no indication that this pattern is about to change.”

Before 1990, it took an average of 21 months for the economy to regain the jobs shed during a recession, according to an analysis of Labor Department data by the National Employment Law Project and the Economic Policy Institute, a labor-oriented research group in Washington.

After the recessions in 1990 and in 2001, 31 and 46 months passed before employment returned to its previous peaks. The economy was growing, but companies remained conservative in their hiring.

Some 34 million people were hired into new and existing private-sector jobs in 2000, at the tail end of an expansion, according to Labor Department data. A year later, in the midst of recession, hiring had fallen off to 31.6 million. And as late as 2003, with the economy again growing, hiring in the private sector continued to slip, to 29.8 million.

It was a jobless recovery: Business was picking up, but it simply did not translate into more work. This time, hiring may be especially subdued, labor economists say.

Traditionally, three sectors have led the way out of recession: automobiles, home building and banking. But auto companies have been shrinking because strapped households have less buying power. Home building is limited by fears about a glut of foreclosed properties. Banking is expanding, but this seems largely a function of government support that is being withdrawn.

At the same time, the continued bite of the financial crisis has crimped the flow of money to small businesses and new ventures, which tend to be major sources of new jobs.

All of which helps explain why Ms. Eisen — who has never before struggled to find work — feels a familiar pain each time she scans job listings on her computer: There are positions in health care, most requiring experience she lacks. Office jobs demand familiarity with software she has never used. Jobs at fast food restaurants are mostly secured by young people and immigrants.

If, as Mr. Sinai expects, the economy again expands without adding many jobs, millions of people like Ms. Eisen will be dependent on an unemployment insurance already being severely tested.

“The system was ill prepared for the reality of long-term unemployment,” said Maurice Emsellem, a policy director for the National Employment Law Project. “Now, you add a severe recession, and you have created a crisis of historic proportions.”

Fewer Protections

Some poverty experts say the broader social safety net is not up to cushioning the impact of the worst downturn since the Great Depression. Social services are less extensive than during the last period of double-digit unemployment, in the early 1980s.

On average, only two-thirds of unemployed people received state-provided unemployment checks last year, according to the Labor Department. The rest either exhausted their benefits, fell short of requirements or did not apply.

“You have very large sets of people who have no social protections,” said Randy Albelda, an economist at the University of Massachusetts in Boston. “They are landing in this netherworld.”

When Ms. Eisen and her husband, Jeff, applied for food stamps, they were turned away for having too much monthly income. The cutoff was $1,570 a month — $25 less than her husband’s disability check.

Reforms in the mid-1990s imposed time limits on cash assistance for poor single mothers, a change predicated on the assumption that women would trade welfare checks for paychecks.

Yet as jobs have become harder to get, so has welfare: as of 2006, 44 states cut off anyone with a household income totaling 75 percent of the poverty level — then limited to $1,383 a month for a family of three — according to an analysis by Ms. Albelda.

“We have a work-based safety net without any work,” said Timothy M. Smeeding, director of the Institute for Research on Poverty at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. “People with more education and skills will probably figure something out once the economy picks up. It’s the ones with less education and skills: that’s the new poor.”

Here in Orange County, the expanse of suburbia stretching south from Los Angeles, long-term unemployment reaches even those who once had six-figure salaries. A center of the national mortgage industry, the area prospered in the real estate boom and suffered with the bust.

Until she was laid off two years ago, Janine Booth, 41, brought home roughly $10,000 a month in commissions from her job selling electronics to retailers. A single mother of three, she has been living lately on $2,000 a month in child support and about $450 a week in unemployment insurance — a stream of checks that ran out last week.

For Ms. Booth, work has been a constant since her teenage years, when she cleaned houses under pressure from her mother to earn pocket money. Today, Ms. Booth pays her $1,500 monthly mortgage with help from her mother, who is herself living off savings after being laid off.

“I don’t want to take money from her,” Ms. Booth said. “I just want to find a job.”

Ms. Booth, with a résumé full of well-paid sales jobs, seems the sort of person who would have little difficulty getting work. Yet two years of looking have yielded little but anxiety.

She sends out dozens of résumés a week and rarely hears back. She responds to online ads, only to learn they are seeking operators for telephone sex lines or people willing to send mysterious packages from their homes.

She spends weekdays in a classroom in Anaheim, in a state-financed training program that is supposed to land her a job in medical administration. Even if she does find a job, she will be lucky if it pays $15 an hour.

“What is going to happen?” she asked plaintively. “I worry about my kids. I just don’t want them to think I’m a failure.”

On a recent weekend, she was running errands with her 18-year-old son when they stopped at an A.T.M. and he saw her checking account balance: $50.

“He says, ‘Is that all you have?’ ” she recalled. “ ‘Are we going to be O.K.?’ ”

Yes, she replied — and not only for his benefit.

“I have to keep telling myself it’s going to be O.K.,” she said. “Otherwise, I’d go into a deep depression.”

Last week, she made up fliers advertising her eagerness to clean houses — the same activity that provided her with spending money in high school, and now the only way she sees fit to provide for her kids. She plans to place the fliers on porches in some other neighborhood.

“I don’t want to clean my neighbors’ houses,” she said. “I know I’m going to come out of this. There’s no way I’m going to be homeless and poverty-stricken. But I am scared. I have a lot of sleepless nights.”

For the Eisens, poverty is already here. In the two years Ms. Eisen has been without work, they have exhausted their savings of about $24,000. Their credit card balances have grown to $15,000.

“I don’t know how we’re still indoors,” she said.

Her 1994 Dodge Caravan broke down in January, leaving her to ask for rides to an employment center.

She does not have the money to move to a cheaper apartment.

“You have to have money for first and last month’s rent, and to open utility accounts,” she said.

What she has is personality and presence — two traits that used to seem enough. She narrates her life in a stream of self-deprecating wisecracks, her punch lines tinged with desperation.

“See that,” she said, spotting a man dressed as the Statue of Liberty. Standing on a sidewalk, he waved at passing cars with a sign advertising a tax preparation business. “That will be me next week. Do you think this guy ever thought he’d be doing this?”

And yet, she would gladly do this. She would do nearly anything.

“There are no bad jobs now,” she says. “Any job is a good job.”

She has applied everywhere she can think of — at offices, at gas stations. Nothing.

“I’m being seen as a person who is no longer viable,” she said. “I’m chalking it up to my age and my weight. Blame it on your most prominent insecurity.”

Two Incomes, Then None

Ms. Eisen grew up poor, in Flatbush in Brooklyn. Her father was in maintenance. Her mother worked part time at a company that made window blinds.

She married Jeff when she was 19, and they soon moved to California, where he had grown up. He worked in sales for a chemical company. They rented an apartment in Buena Park, a growing spread of houses filling out former orange groves. She stayed home and took care of their daughter.

“I never asked him how much he earned,” Ms. Eisen said. “I was of the mentality that the husband took care of everything. But we never wanted.”

By the early 1980s, gas and rent strained their finances. So she took a job as a quality assurance clerk at a factory that made aircraft parts. It paid $13.50 an hour and had health insurance.

When the company moved to Mexico in the early 1990s, Ms. Eisen quickly found a job at a travel agency. When online booking killed that business, she got the job at the beauty salon equipment company. It paid $13.25 an hour, with an annual bonus — enough for presents under the Christmas tree.

But six years ago, her husband took a fall at work and then succumbed to various ailments — diabetes, liver disease, high blood pressure — leaving him confined to the couch. Not until 2008 did he secure his disability check.

And now they find themselves in this desert of joblessness, her paycheck replaced by a $702 unemployment check every other week. She received 14 weeks of benefits after she lost her job, and then a seven-week extension.

For most of October through December 2008, she received nothing, as she waited for another extension. The checks came again, then ran out in September 2009. They were restored by an extension right before Christmas.

Their daughter has back problems and is living on disability checks, making the church their ultimate safety net.

“I never thought I’d be in the position where I had to go to a food bank,” Ms. Eisen said. But there she is, standing in the parking lot of the Calvary Chapel church, chatting with a half-dozen women, all waiting to enter the Bread of Life Food Pantry.

When her name is called, she steps into a windowless alcove, where a smiling woman hands her three bags of groceries: carrots, potatoes, bread, cheese and a hunk of frozen meat.

“Haven’t we got a lot to be thankful for?” Ms. Eisen asks.

For one thing, no pinto beans.

“I’ve got 10 bags of pinto beans,” she says. “And I have no clue how to cook a pinto bean.”

Local job listings are just as mysterious. On a bulletin board at the county-financed ProPath Business and Career Services Center, many are written in jargon hinting of accounting or computers.

“Nothing I’m qualified for,” Ms. Eisen says. “When you can’t define what it is, that’s a pretty good indication.”

Her counselor has a couple of possibilities — a cashier at a supermarket and a night desk job at a motel.

“I’ll e-mail them,” Ms. Eisen promises. “I’ll tell them what a shining example of humanity I am.”

Source

Israel To Erect Red Army Memorial?

Lenin in front of hammer and sickel

Are the Jewish extremists opposed to mass murder against all people, or only against Jews?

Israel to erect memorial praising the Red Army which raped, tortured, murdered and enslaved half of Europe!

The prime minister of Israel, war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu recently told Vladimir Putin that Israel would erect a memorial to the red army of the Second World War. The Bolshevik Army during the war committed horrendous war crimes against not only the people of Germany but against hundreds of millions of  people in Eastern Europe. At least 8,000,000 women and girls were raped, two million of them Germans, millions were murdered, millions more send to the sickness, murder and death in the Gulags.

This move by Netanyahu gives us a real sense of the true nature of Israel and the Jewish extremists that run the country and have the power over the press and politics of many Western nations. Don’t worry, there will not be a peep of protest out of Washington, in fact, Presidents of the United States have themselves honored the Red Army, the same Red Army that enslaved Eastern Europe for half of a century and murdered millions of innocents.

Of course Israel also does not recognize the Armenian Holocaust either. “There shalt not be any holocausts before Thee.”

Netanyahu was in Moscow to press Russia to help Israel pass “crippling sanctions against Iran” for daring to make it possible for Iran to enrich their uranium into fuel for their many Nuclear Power Reactors.

Ironically, as Netanyahu calls for crippling sanctions against Iran for making atomic fuel that it says could be used for atomic weapons, Israel sits on over 200 atomic weapons, as well as an arsenal of thousands of biological and chemical weapons. The Telegraph in Britain even reported that Israel was working on biological weapons that would target populations by their DNA!

While Iran has allowed inspections Israel will not allow any inspections.

Israel is a nation that has stolen the land of Palestine, ethnically cleansed hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, terrorized them, murdered them, tortured them. Recently Israel killed hundreds of women and children in Gaza and wounded thousands more using illegal, horrendous white phosphorous weapons. The other day, Israel illegally hijacked British passports and then murdered a Palestinian leader in another nation. Are Western leaders are calling for sanctions against Israel….. NO, not a chance!  They are calling for them against Iran, a nation that hasn’t started a war or invaded another nation in over a hundred years!

For God’s sake, when will people wake up to how the media and politics of America and Europe are almost completely controlled by the Zionists? For my part I will continue to stand up and point out the big, hairy, nasty Gorilla in the room!

David Duke

Obama Dictatorship Is Coming

By Jeff Davis

The Democrats have had a very frustrating year. They tried to maintain “bipartisanship.” They tried to persuade people to “trust them” that Obamacare would not be a disaster, that would tax people into oblivion, and the health care would be endlessly watered down and millions of additional illegal immigrants would come north of the border, not for jobs, but for any and all medical problems.

From now on, Obama won’t bother to try to build a consensus. He’ll just do whatever the hell he wants to do, or rather whatever Rahm Emanuel tells him to do.

The New York Times reports, “With much of his legislative agenda stalled in Congress, President Obama and his team are preparing an array of actions using his executive power to advance energy, environmental, fiscal and other domestic policy priorities.”

It’s called rule by decree or dictate. That’s where the word dictatorship comes from.

The Times notes “Obama has not given up hope of progress on Capitol Hill, aides said, and has scheduled a session with Republican leaders on health care later this month.But in the aftermath of a special election in Massachusetts that cost Democrats unilateral control of the Senate, the White House is getting ready to act on its own in the face of partisan gridlock heading into the midterm campaign. ‘We are reviewing a list of presidential executive orders and directives to get the job done across a front of issues,’ said Rahm Emanuel, the White House chief of staff.’ ”

Who would want to go to session with Obama, wherein he will act like an Affirmative Action college professor, lecture them and try to show off how many big words he can put on his teleprompter, many of which he will mispronounce, such as “corpsman” which Obama pronounces “corpseman.”

The Times goes on: “Any president has vast authority to influence policy even without legislation, through executive orders, agency rule-making and administrative fiat…. the Environmental Protection Agency is moving forward with possible regulations on heat-trapping gases blamed for climate change, while a bill to cap such emissions languishes in the Senate.”

Despite all the revelations exposing Global Warming, including the Climategate scandal, you’d think the Democrats would ease up on the job-killing Global Warming nonsense. The real point of Global Warming legislation is to give the Democrats a club that they will use to beat big corporations with —if these corporations don’t donate enough money to the Democrat Party.

We should have stopped Bush and Cheney at the time when they began to tear up the Constitution. We didn’t. Bush and Cheney left a whole structure of tyranny, extra-legal procedures and precedent behind, delivered into the hands of an African tyrant who is quite capable of turning into another Idi Amin or Robert Mugabe once the last few restraints have been removed. We desperately need to retake this country for ourselves and the two-party system is our enemy.

Source

The Hollywood Basterds

Youtube Just Censored This Video!

Youtube which is owned by Google has been complaining about censorship in China. This video has had over 17,000 views on its first day. Was number 4 in its favorites list for news and current events. And had hundreds of 5 star ratings.

We are appealing the censorship. In the meantime the link has been replaced.

This video exposes the sick elements in Hollywood, but Youtube can’t have that, can they?

In his latest and greatest video yet, Dr. Duke really gives it to Hollywood. He reviews Inglourious Basterds and shows it is a sick hate-film, promoting torture and sadism. As he says, it is bad enough that the film was even made, but the rest of the media gave it great reviews.

Duke exposes Eli Roth who is a co-star who makes sadistic “torture-porn” films. His film Hostel actually got  60 percent positive reviews from Jewish run media.

This is a powerful video that lays bare the evil world, which the Jewish extremists are leading us to.

Source

YouTube will eventually censor all the uploads of this video, when that happens click here to watch, or download.

The Tide Has Changed

UK/Ireland Passport

By Gilad Atzmon

London is ‘angry’ over the use of stolen identities by the Dubai assassins and points its finger at the Jewish state and its notorious Mossad espionage agency. The Israeli ambassador to Britain, Ron Prosor, was summoned yesterday by the foreign minister to “share information”. In practice Britain has stopped short of accusing Israel of involvement in the scandalous assassination, however to signal its displeasure the Foreign Office ignored an Israeli plea to keep the summons secret. “Relations were in the freezer before this. They are in the deep freeze now,” a British official told the Guardian.

The British anger at Israel would be a positive signal in the right direction if we were not aware of British Foreign Secretary David Miliband investing enormous efforts trying to amend Britain’s ethical stand just to appease Tzipi Livni, Ehud Barak and other Israeli leaders. The British Foreign Ministry’s reaction could almost be deemed a revelation, were we able to forget that just five weeks before Israel launched its lethal criminal attack against Gaza, David Miliband visited Sderot, an Israeli town on the Gaza border to offer his support. “No country can accept constant bombardment of its citizens”, Miliband told the people of Sderot. He then continued “Israel should, above all, seek to protect its own citizens”. It was that foolish statement by Britain’s Foreign Secretary that made us all complicit in Israel’s flattening of Gaza. Bearing these facts in mind, it is rather unlikely that the Israeli Ambassador to Britain was sweating while ‘sharing information’ with the chief aid to the British Foreign Secretary.

In the last few days Robert Fisk reported from the Middle East that, in Dubai there is not much doubt about Britain being involved in the Israeli blunder. “The British passports are real”, says one of Fisk’s sources in Dubai. “They are hologram pictures with the biometric stamp. They are not forged or fake. The names were really there. If you can fake a hologram or biometric stamp, what does this mean?” The truth better be exposed here. As if this is not enough, the Israeli Ynet reports today (quoting the Daily Mail) that Israel informed the British government that its agents were going to carry out an ‘overseas operation’ using forged British passports. “It wasn’t a request for permission, but rather a courtesy call”.

If Britain was collaborating with Israel at any level, we better know it all, we better find out whether it was a person or a body within the Government or the intelligence, or just an ordinary sayan* in the Home Office or any other government office. If there was British collaboration, we better identify what it was exactly, who decided to serve Israeli murderous interests in our midst. We also better find out who in Britain decided to put British interests and British security in the Arab world at enormous risk.

In the Guardian yesterday Seumas Milne didn’t save his words either. “Instead of setting off a diplomatic backlash, the British government sat on its hands for almost a week after it was reportedly first passed details of the passport abuse. And while the Foreign Office finally summoned the Israeli ambassador to ‘share information’, rather than to protest, Gordon Brown could ­ yesterday only promise a ‘full investigation’”.

The truth of the matter is tragic. The British political system is paralysed by the Israeli Lobby. Like in the USA, British national interests are sacrificed for the sake of dirty Zionist cash. If Britain wants to liberate itself from the Zionist grip and have any prospect of a future, it must move fast and clean the entire list of Zionist infiltrators from its political ranks, Government offices and strategic positions. I am not talking here about Jews. By no means do I mention ethnicity or race. I am talking here about a political and ideological affiliation. Considering Zionism is a murderous, racist, expansionist ideology, it is natural to stress that people who are affiliated with Israel and Zionism must be removed immediately from any political, government, military or strategic posts and so on.

As much as Britain would refrain from delegating decisions regarding its security with Arab, Chinese or Russian Nationalists, it should similarly treat Jewish nationalists with at least as much caution.

But here is the good news. Unlike the Zionised British political system, the British people and media are actually outraged. The Mossad’s blunder, as well as the British political impotence is overwhelmingly exposed in the British press. It is on the front page of every British daily paper, it is featured on every TV news item. There is no doubt today, the patience towards Israeli barbarism is clearly running out.

A few years back I was listening to a talk given by Dr. Mustafa Barghouti who pointed out that back in 1948 the world stood silent watching 750,000 Palestinian people being driven out of their land, their villages and their cities through an orchestrated ethnic cleansing coupled with many massacres. The world kept silent when Israel set its racist return laws to prevent the Palestinians from returning to their land. In 1967, the developed world wasn’t just silent, it actually praised the Israeli expansionist extravaganza. It applauded the IDF as it cleansed tens of thousands of Palestinians out of their historic land.

But then things started to change. In the Lebanon war of 1982 the world at large was still pretty silent as 30,000 Palestinian and Lebanese were butchered by the Israeli Air Force and the IDF. Yet it miraculously woke the Left up from its terminal snooze. Some activists started to realise that Palestinians and their cause were at the heart of the battle for a better world. During the first and the second Intifadas more and more people came to realise that Israel was the aggressor. In 2006 Israel again unleashed total havoc in Lebanon. This time Israel left 3,000 fatalities. However, the impact of these successive Israeli brutalities led to a drastic rise of anti Israeli feelings. It was in fact the 2nd Lebanon war (rather than Iraq) that was the catalyst for Tony Blair’s overdue political downfall. Blair paid an immediate political price for condoning the war. The Gaza massacre of 2009, left 1,400 dead Palestinians, most of them women and children, it left Gaza in total ruin, but as we know, it also led to the highest tide of anti Israeli resentments in every possible level in the media, in the street and even in the UN.

This week we learn about Israel’s latest murderous blunder. It assassinated a Hamas military leader. While in the past Israel would be praised for the courage of its assassin squads, those who are chasing the enemies of the Jews in far lands and beyond, the reaction this week is very different. The Jewish state is now regarded as a qualified pariah state. British media and people start to see through it. No one in the British press stood for Israel, no one tried to justify or advocate Israel’s acts. No one repeated the clichés about Hamas being a terrorist organisation. I guess that by now, people out there grasp that Hamas is Palestine’s democratically elected leadership. People also realise that Hamas is justified in pursuing a fully legitimate struggle for liberation.

As much as Israelis and their supporters try to tell us that the diplomatic backlash is fuelled by merely technical matters such as ‘identity theft’, reading the British press conveys a far deeper resentment to Israel, what it stands for and the way it operates.

For a while some of us have been talking about remote signs that the tide is changing. As it happens, we are waking up into a new reality. The tide has changed already. Israel has exhausted the last drops of moral integrity, as if it possessed such an integrity to start with. Britain and every Western country better move fast and identify the enemy within, those amongst us who support the Zionist project and convert us all into being complicit partners in Israel’s never ending sin.

*Sayan- a unique and important part of the Mossad’s operation. The Sayan (assistant) must be 100 percent Jewish. The Sayan supports the Israeli cause and assists the Mossad operation. Victor Ostrovsky the veteran Mossad agent says: “There are thousands of sayanim around the world. In London alone, there are about 2,000 who are active, and another 5,000 on the list…” To read more

Source

Trick Questions

What do Christopher Columbus’s crew, the chief fixer of the 1919 World Series, and the principal saboteurs of the 9/11 skeptics movement have in common?

Hmm? Can’t get it? OK, how about an easier question.

What do Saul of Tarsus, Sigmund Freud, and Bob Dylan have in common?

Sorry, only two of them were musicians.

How about this one?

What do the 13 principal advisers to King George who counseled him on how to crush the American revolution, as well as the two top contributors to George Washington’s Continental Army, and the man who leased the Twin Towers three months before they were turned into a pile of radioactive rubble have in common?

Got a clue?

Sheesh! Let’s try one more. What do eleven popes, seven presidents, and the entire current White House staff have in common? What do the president of every TV network, the men who were the secret power behind the thrones of U.S. presidents throughout the 20th century, and  the Hollywood movie moguls have in common? What do the Bolsheviks (killers of 66 million Russians), the Jacobins (who got the French to kill their friends by the hundreds of thousands), and the men who pay the media to say Muslims did 9/11 have in common?

If you haven’t correctly answered this first question by now, then stop reading, go to the hospital and get your swine flu shot. Don’t write home.

If you don’t understand what’s going on in the world by now – and most people don’t because they think the people on TV are objective – then you have no hope of answering the remaining questions on this test. As a result, you will never have any understanding of what’s going on in the world without answering this question.

What do literary classics that are changed ever so slightly to alter their meanings, industrial poisons that are turned into medicine endorsed by doctors who are paid to say they are safe, and laws commanding people to pay for money that is already theirs have in common?

What do global warming, NAFTA, and worldwide Judea declaring war on Germany in 1933, then working for eight years to create a conflagration in which 60 million people died all across Europe have in common?

What do AIDS, Ebola, and what the Talmud says about why certain of their devotees should practice medicine have in common?

What do movie reviewers who insist people really want to see slasher horror movies, newscasters who can sincerely say U.S. presidents work hard for peace, and journalists who say the Catholic church is behind all the horror in the world have in common?

What do people who say their dual Israeli citizenship has no effect on their feelings of patriotism about the United States (I’m sure of that!), liberal columnists who manage to swallow the line that the Palestinians are a danger to Talmudic peace of mind, and American parents who bury their children after they were fragged by their friends as part of a twisted American quota system have in common.

What do anyone who dares to defend the twisted tenets of the Talmud, psychotic aphasiacs who believe their G-d encourages them to maim and destroy all those who are not like them and have agreed to lie to everyone, and those have no clue about doing something nice for someone for no particular reason with no ulterior motive other than that’s the best way to live have in common?

And lastly, what do those who have already taken all of your money far into the future, those who are about to waste your life on something stupid, and the Homeland Security department, which protects only the financial predator class but not us hoodwinked Holsteins, have in common?

Your apprehension in answering this question loudly and clearly is exactly the mindlock that has the world spiraling toward its doom.

Congratulations to those who passed this first Skylax University Surprise Quickie Quiz. If there never is another one, at least you’ll have the pleasure of knowing that at least you knew who it was that finally turned your lights out for good.

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida in a state of continuous amazement that people don’t see that the diseased and artificial entity formerly known as the United States of America has devolved into a kind of junior Bulgaria, where what one person thinks is simply not accepted unless validated by a large media poll in which no one really understands either the question or the vote counting procedures. http://johnkaminski.info/

Source

Wall Street Oligarchs Eying Social Security

By Paul Craig Roberts

Hank Paulson, the Gold Sachs bankster/U.S. Treasury Secretary, who deregulated the financial system, caused a world crisis that wrecked the prospects of foreign banks and governments, caused millions of Americans to lose retirement savings, homes, and jobs, and left taxpayers burdened with multi-trillions of dollars of new U.S. debt, is still not in jail. He is writing in the New York Times urging that the mess he caused be fixed by taking away from working Americans the Social Security and Medicare for which they have paid in earmarked taxes all their working lives.

Wall Street’s approach to the poor has always been to drive them deeper into the ground.

As there is no money to be made from the poor, Wall Street fleeces them by yanking away their entitlements. It has always been thus. During the Reagan administration, Wall Street decided to boost the values of its bond and stock portfolios by using Social Security revenues to lower budget deficits. Wall Street figured that lower deficits would mean lower interest rates and higher bond and stock prices.

Two Wall Street henchmen, Alan Greenspan and David Stockman, set up the Social Security raid in this way: The Carter administration had put Social Security in the black for the foreseeable future by establishing a schedule for future Social Security payroll tax increases. Greenspan and Stockman conspired to phase in the payroll tax increases earlier than were needed in order to gain surplus Social Security revenues that could be used to finance other government spending, thus reducing the budget deficit.

They sold it to President Reagan as “putting Social Security on a sound basis.”

Along the way Americans were told that the surplus revenues were going into a special Social Security trust fund at the U.S. Treasury. But what is in the fund is Treasury IOUs for the spent revenues. When the “trust funds” are needed to pay Social Security benefits, the Treasury will have to sell more debt in order to redeem the IOUs.

Social Security was mugged again during the Clinton administration when the Boskin Commission jimmied the Consumer Price Index in order to reduce the inflation adjustments that Social Security recipients receive, thus diverting money from Social Security retirees to other uses.

We constantly hear from Wall Street gangsters and from Republicans and an occasional Democrat that Social Security and Medicare are a form of welfare that we can’t afford, an “unfunded liability.” This is a lie. Social Security is funded with an earmarked tax. People pay for Social Security and Medicare all their working lives. It is a pay-as-you-go system in which the taxes paid by those working fund those who are retired.

Currently these systems are not in deficit. The problem is that government is using earmarked revenues for other purposes. Indeed, since the 1980s Social Security revenues have been used to fund general government. Today Social Security revenues are being used to fund trillion dollar bailouts for Wall Street and to fund the Bush/Obama wars of aggression against Muslims.

Having diverted Social Security revenues to war and Wall Street, Paulson says there is no alternative but to take the promised benefits away from those who have paid for them.

Republicans have extraordinary animosity toward the poor. In an effort to talk retirees out of their support systems, Republicans frequently describe Social Security as a Ponzi scheme and “unsustainable.” They ought to know. The phony trust fund, that they set up to hide the fact that Wall Street and the Pentagon are running off with Social Security revenues, is a Ponzi scheme. Social Security itself has been with us since the 1930s and has yet to wreck our lives and budget. But it only took Hank Paulson’s derivative Ponzi scheme and its bailout a few years to inflict irreparable damage on our lives and budget.

Years ago with stagflation defeated and a rising stock market, I favored privatizing Social Security as a way of creating a funded retirement system and producing greater savings and larger incomes for retirees. At that time Wall Street was interested, not for my reasons, but in order to collect the fees from managing the funds.

Had Social Security been privatized, I doubt that Wall Street would have been permitted to deregulate the financial system. Too much would have been at stake.

After the latest crisis brought on by Wall Street’s dishonesty and greed, trusting Wall Street to manage anyone’s old age pension requires a leap of faith that no intelligent person can make.

Wall Street has got away with its raid on the public treasury. Now, pockets full, it wants to pay for the heist by curtailing Social Security and Medicare. Having deprived the working population of homes, jobs, and health care, Wall Street is now after the elderly’s old age security.

Social Security, formerly an untouchable “third rail of politics,” is now “unsustainable,” while the real unsustainables—a pre-1929 unregulated financial system and open-ended multi-trillion dollar Global War Against Terror—are the new untouchables.

This transformation signals the complete capture of American democracy by an oligarchy of special interests.

Paul Craig Roberts [email him] was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury during President Reagan’s first term.  He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal.  He has held numerous academic appointments, including the William E. Simon Chair, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, and Senior Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He was awarded the Legion of Honor by French President Francois Mitterrand. He is the author of Supply-Side Revolution : An Insider’s Account of Policymaking in Washington;  Alienation and the Soviet Economy and Meltdown: Inside the Soviet Economy, and is the co-author with Lawrence M. Stratton of The Tyranny of Good Intentions : How Prosecutors and Bureaucrats Are Trampling the Constitution in the Name of Justice. Click here for Peter Brimelow’s Forbes Magazine interview with Roberts about the epidemic of prosecutorial misconduct. His latest book, How The Economy Was Lost, has just been published by CounterPunch/AK Press.

Source

Terrified Scottish Establishment Desperate To Suppress Exposure Of Their “Paedophile Ring”

A ring that connects into the ‘heart’ of the Scottish and British governments and the Westminster Parliament and involved Dunblane mass child killer, Thomas Hamilton

Reporter Robert Green was arrested in Aberdeen for the crime of exposing these sick and depraved people who get their ‘kicks’ from sexually abusing and raping children, including the Down’s Syndrome girl, Hollie Greig - but was released from court after a massive phone and email protest from all over the United Kingdon and indeed the world.

But we must not let this issue drop – it must be followed through to its conclusion. Please help.

THIS IS THE INFORMATION THAT THEY ARE DESPERATE TO SUPPRESS …

Here is Robert Green’s 5-part Speech on Hollie Greig’s story

Part 1

Part 2, Part 3,Part 4,Part 5


Thomas Hamilton, Dunblane killer, Freemasonic paedophile and procurer of children for the Scottish ‘elite’

Hey, Scottish ‘elite’. You can cancel the laxative order. It won’t be necessary.

I can tell you after 20 years of full-time research in now 50 countries that paedophilia and Satanism are the ‘cement’ that hold the establishment structure together in every country, not least Scotland – and the two are fundamentally connected.

Read More …


LORD ADVOCATE OF SCOTLAND ELISH ANGIOLINI YOU ARE A LIAR AND A BLOODY DISGRACE – YOU SHOULD BE IN JAIL TOO!

You may intimidate the pathetic media of Scotland, but you don’t intimidate me

Now issue a libel writ and let’s get all of this out into the public arena so everyone can see what lies under the stone. Come on, make my day.


Angiolini: Covering for Paedophilia?

‘For those of us following the Hollie Greig case, it is particularly shocking that when challenged about the lack of action from Scotland’s prosecutors and the police, instead of a statement from the Lord Advocate stating her position, a persistent stream of threatening letters from a Mr. Callum Anderson of Scottish law firm, Levy & McRae have been issued on her behalf.

The question that sprung to my mind when I saw these communications was, what is Ms. Angiolini, the Lord Advocate of Scotland, afraid of that she feels the need to hide behind solicitors letters?

And then, a kind member of the public pointed us to a previous incident reported on by the Telegraph, involving Ms. Angiolini in her role as Procurator Fiscal for Grampian, Highlands and Islands.’

Read More …


On Friday, February 12th reporter Robert Green was arrested by Scottish police in an effort to silence him:

Scottish ‘Justice’ Secretary linked to Lord Advocate’s lawyers after Police arrest journalist over reporting of Aberdeen Paedophile gang claims

‘Journalist & Broadcaster Robert Green was arrested by Grampian Police on Friday. Scotland’s Crown Office are said to be heavily involved in the arrest in Aberdeen on Friday of the well known England based journalist & broadcaster Robert Green, who traveled to the Grampian area late Thursday to attend a public protest against the lack of action by Scotland’s law enforcement agencies to prosecute identified individuals in an Aberdeen based paedophile gang, names which include key members of Scotland’s legal establishment and even a local Sheriff, who stand accused of serial abuse of disabled victims, including downs syndrome girl, Hollie Greig.

Grampian Police arrested the journalist on ‘breach of the peace’. Grampian Police apparently swooped on Mr. Green before he was even able to attend Friday’s planned protest, taking him into custody earlier in the morning on a charge of breach of the peace, which Mr. Green had been detained on, until his appearance tomorrow (Monday) at Aberdeen Sheriff court, where ironically, Mr. Green will be taken before a colleague of a Sheriff who was identified by one of the abuse victims as being an alleged member of the paedophile gang at the centre of the case, who are accused of abusing disabled victims & also passing vulnerable children around their ranks.’

Read More …


Lies, Damned Lies and Scottish Justice

Lawyers for the Lord Advocate of Scotland Elish Angiolini threaten UKColumn over Hollie Greig postings

‘Levy & McRae were abusive and threatening in their calls to the UKColumn and they have sent a number of communications alleging that they act on behalf of the Scottish Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini. Levy & McRae refuse to state whether they act for Mrs. Angiolini in her official position and capacity, or her capacity as a private individual.

Normally reliable sources close to the Scottish Government allege that Angiolini has been using Scottish taxpayers money to pay Levy & McRae – including legal threats to Google over their exposure of the Hollie Greig paedophile abuse. Levy & McRae’s actions are further compounded by their recent reference to Sheriff Buchanan. who was named by Robert Green in his public statement. It is not clear if Levy & McRae are also acting for Buchanan.’

Sheriff Graeme Buchanan – named by Hollie Greig and Robert Green

‘Deeper research reveals other strange facts in the Hollie Greig abuse scandal. Colin McKerracher, the Chief Constable of Grampian Police – the force which failed to investigate Hollie Greig’s abuse, but can arrest Robert Green for speaking out – is Chairman of the North East of Scotland Child Protection Committee NESCPC. He is the main signatory of NESCPC’s 2008 – 2009 business plan.’

Colin McKerracher, the Chief Constable of Grampian Police, the force which failed to investigate Hollie Greig’s abuse, but then arrested Robert Green for trying to do what the police should have done, is Chairman of the North East of Scotland Child Protection Committee??

Why would someone act like this in relation to the Hollie Greig case and Robert Green and be a top name in ‘child protection’? Maybe you can work it out. I have.

Read More …


Hollie Greig’s blog about her abusers and reporter, Robert Green, who has been arrested for exposing the Scottish establishment paedophile ring

My god the establishment is pathetic. The brave ‘men’ and ‘women’ who force a Down’s syndrome child and her mother to flee from Scotland to England to get away from their abuse and intimidation. You’ve got brains the size of a processed pea and balls the size of peanuts.

But it is comeuppance time, chaps. It’s just a matter of when and it is getting closer every day … tick, tick, tick …

(By the way, the peanut analogy also applies to the mainstream media who say the story is ‘too hot to handle’. No, no. It’s just that you are so fundamentally challenged in the testicle department that you have not got the guts to handle it. My god what are you men or mice? Never mind the children, eh? Your own back is all that matters.)

Click here to read Hollie’s blog (written with help from her mum) …

Please circulate Hollie’s blog address far and wide


ALEX SALMOND ‘LEADER’ OF THE SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT YOU ARE A BLOODY DISGRACE!

Ahhhh, there you are. Is that a ‘journalist’ behind you?

‘Your Scotland, Your Voice’ – unless you are a Down’s syndrome girl serially-abused by ‘pillars’ of the Scottish establishment. Then they chase you out of the country and arrest the man who is trying to win you justice, eh, Mr Salmond?

Please contact Alex Salmond, leader of the Scottish Parliament, and demand that action is taken in this case … email: firstminister@scotland.gsi.gov.uk

Please also email Scottish Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini and demand that she stop the cover up of horrific child abuse by the Scottish ‘elite’ … email elish.angiolini@scotland.gsi.gov.uk

Thousands have contacted these people to protest from all over the United Kingdom and indeed the world in the last few days. Please can we keep it up. Thank you.

PLEASE CIRCULATE FAR AND WIDE

Source



The Greatest Threat to America

The current United States Supreme Court, the highest court in the United States, in 2006. Top row (left to right): Associate Justice Stephen Breyer, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Associate Justice Samuel Alito. Bottom row (left to right): Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy, Associate Justice John Paul Stevens, Chief Justice John Roberts, Associate Justice Antonin Scalia, and Associate Justice David Souter. Ginsburg retired last year and Sonia Sotomayor (not shown), was appointed in 2009 by Barack Obama. She is the first Hispanic and only the third woman to serve on the Court.

By David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru

They despise America’s democracy and its fundamental freedoms more than any terrorist group in the world.

They have destroyed American democracy and its fundamental freedoms more ruthlessly and effectively than any terrorist group in the world.

They have sanctioned the murders of more Americans than any terrorist group in the world.

They loathe people of different races and/or religions.

They punish the innocent, but take extraordinary measures to protect the guilty.

They operate in shadowy black disguises.

They are known to the FBI, the CIA, the NSA and the Department of Homeland Security, yet none of these agencies have made the slightest effort to stop them.

They are Antonin Scalia, John Roberts, Anthony Kennedy, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, the four white racists and one self-loathing African-American who currently comprise the “conservative” majority on the United States Supreme Court.

Before readers dismiss these opening paragraphs as mere hyperbole, they should examine some of the Supreme Court’s more egregious rulings.

This court endorsed the random drug testing of public school students who are not even suspected of abusing drugs, which means that thousands of innocent children across America are dragged from their classrooms everyday, ordered to reveal personal medical information, and forced to urinate as strangers listen to them doing so—intrusions into personal dignity and privacy that Scalia has described as “minimal.”

In addition, people arrested for certain crimes can be compelled to provide a sample of their DNA to government authorities, even though they have not been tried or convicted. Yet, in the case of District Attorney’s Office v. Osborne, the Supreme Court ruled that persons convicted of crimes have “no constitutional right to obtain postconviction access to the State’s evidence for DNA testing,” even though that testing could establish their innocence.

In other words, a system that claims people are “innocent until proven guilty” now requires people to provide DNA and/or other bodily fluids to prove their innocence, yet does not require the government to provide DNA evidence that could exonerate a wrongfully convicted person, even though a wrongful conviction means that the real perpetrator is free and potentially committing more crimes.

This judicial hypocrisy is sickening beyond belief, and it’s tragic that karma isn’t more rapid and righteous, because nothing would be more satisfying than seeing Scalia, Roberts, Kennedy, Alito and Thomas entombed in the worst of America’s prisons, subjected to gang violence and forcibly sodomized on a daily basis, begging their attorneys to obtain the DNA evidence that could free them, only to be told that the “State” has refused to provide it.

The racism of the Supreme Court has been apparent throughout its history, from the now infamous Dred Scott decision, which threatened to expand slavery throughout the United States, to Plessy v. Ferguson, which gave constitutional blessing to the segregationist doctrine of “separate but equal.” And Scalia, Roberts, Kennedy, Alito and Thomas have continued this shameful tradition, in the cases of Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle and Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education, by endorsing the racial resegregation of public schools. And, in an act of judicial callousness that insulted the memory of those who struggled and died during America’s civil rights movement, some of these so-called “justices” even defended their racist “opinion” by citing Brown v. Topeka, the landmark 1954 case that endorsed the desegregation of public schools.

Also, by upholding racial segregation in Plessy, the court essentially declared that African-Americans were second-class citizens. What followed from 1896, when Plessy was decided, until the civil rights era of the 1960s was a sordid history of lynchings, beatings and other injustices directed primarily against African-Americans, as well as the denial of their most fundamental rights, including the right to vote, which supposedly had been guaranteed with the passage of the Fifteenth Amendment in 1870.

In Employment Division v. Smith freedom of religion came under attack when the court ruled that the government no longer had to prove it had a “compelling reason” to interfere with one’s religious practices. When the United States Congress attempted to restore this “compelling reason” requirement via the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), the court voided much of it on the grounds that Congress had exceeded its authority.

Three current members of the court – Scalia, Kennedy and Thomas – and two former members – O’Conner and Rehnquist – bloodied their hands, and (if there is such a thing as justice) damned themselves for all time, when they supported the coup of 2000 in the case of Bush v. Gore. Thanks to this corrupt decision, which illegally placed a sadistic, inept, venal and mendacious cabal of war criminals into the White House, thousands of Americans, and tens of thousands of Iraqis, have died in a war that was based upon nothing but lies.

But Scalia, Kennedy and Thomas were not satisfied with the partial destruction of democracy wrought by Bush v. Gore, particularly since democracy appeared to be restored during the 2008 presidential election. So, joining with Alito and Roberts, they decided to destroy it completely, along with most of the Bill of Rights, in the recent case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission by striking down laws that once limited the amount of money corporations could contribute to political campaigns.

Now corporations are free to buy and sell politicians like trading cards, and, since they control the bulk of the “mainstream” media, they can also ensure that any political messages contrary to theirs are unheard.

In other words, freedom now only belongs to those wealthy enough to afford it.

Although the Citizens United ruling is deplorable and deserving of contempt, it is not surprising. The unified Republican opposition to health care reform has already demonstrated how the bulk of America’s politicians are controlled by special interest groups. The fact that many Democrats refused to endorse any health care reform proposal that included a “public option” for people unable to purchase health insurance in the private sector further illustrates how corporate influence has already transcended party lines.

What Scalia, Roberts, Kennedy, Alito and Thomas undoubtedly hope to accomplish by Citizens United is to purge the few politicians actually devoted to serving the public interest. Now these politicians will either succumb to the whims of their corporate masters, or find limitless amounts of money being provided to their political opponents.

In a nation of millions, it seems almost obscene that five biased, bigoted, corrupt, unethical and agenda driven idiots in black robes can destroy an entire system of government. And it is certainly contrary to what the Supreme Court was supposed to be.

When the federal court system was created, a debate ensued over whether federal judges should be elected or appointed. It was ultimately decided that they would be appointed to lifetime tenures, removable only through death, retirement or impeachment. The hope was that federal judges would be immune from political party influences, act in accordance with the law, and protect the rights of racial, religious and political minorities, since they did not have to raise money in election campaigns or appease the majority in order to win the popular vote.

Unfortunately this hope was quixotic. The five so-called “justices” who weakened democracy in Bush v. Gore, and the five who destroyed it in Citizens United were all appointed by Republican presidents. In fact, Bush’s vice-president Dick Cheney was even Scalia’s “hunting buddy.” So it was not surprising when they ignored legal precedent and common sense to ensure that corporate rights and profits supplanted individual rights and needs.

Even conservative columnist David Broder acknowledged that the Citizens United ruling “extended itself far beyond what was necessary” and “may well be the best news Republicans have received since the 2000 ruling in Bush v. Gore.”

In law schools throughout America, Supreme Court opinions are dissected and analyzed as though they were commandments from Mount Sinai. But during my journey through the legal profession, I came to realize that there was nothing logical, analytical or esoteric about these opinions, and that many of them were inspired by pure evil.

Being legally trained, I have often been reluctant to acknowledge this reality. Attorneys, after all, are supposed to deal in facts, not in suppositions. But, given the cases I have cited in this article, the harm they have caused, and the harm they will cause, I believe there is enough evidence to conclude that Scalia, Roberts, Kennedy, Alito and Thomas are perhaps the most despicable, conscienceless and evil individuals to ever disgrace the United States Supreme Court, and the biggest threat to democracy and the Bill of Rights in the history of the United States.

James Madison, one of America’s founding fathers, once said,

“We are free today substantially, but the day will come when our Republic will be an impossibility . . . because wealth will be concentrated in the hands of a few. And when the day comes, when the wealth of the nation will be in the hands of the few, then we must rely on the best elements in the country to readjust the laws of the nation to the changed conditions.”

Some of the best elements in America did try to readjust the laws to minimize the potential for corporations to use their vast financial resources to purchase political influence. Unfortunately five of the worst elements in America – Scalia, Roberts, Kennedy, Alito and Thomas—have ensured (with apologies to Abraham Lincoln) that the government of the corporations, by the corporations, and for the corporations will cause the government of the people, by the people and for the people to perish from the earth.

Source

Death Sentence in Lebanon for two convicted Israeli Spies

Finally – a little justice!  WW~

Reporters take pictures of electronic instruments Lebanese security forces found with arrested Israeli spies.

Two Israeli spies sentenced to death in Lebanon

A Lebanese court on Thursday sentenced two men to death on charges of espionage and involvement in the killing of senior members of Lebanese and Palestinian resistance groups.

A military tribunal convicted the former member of Lebanon’s security force Mahmoud Qassem Rafeh, 63, of “collaboration and espionage on behalf of the Israeli enemy.”

The retired police officer who was arrested in 2006 admitted last year to providing intelligence for Israeli spying agents over a 13-year period.

He was also charged with involvement in a 2006 car bomb attack in the southern coastal town of Sidon which killed brothers Mahmoud and Nidal Mazjoub of the Islamic Jihad movement.

The death sentence handed to Rafeh came as he awaits trial for the murder of Hezbollah officials Ali Hassan Dib in 1998 and Ali Hussein Saleh in 2003, as well as the 2002 murder of Jihad Jibril, the son of Ahmad Jibril, the leader of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command.

The other defendant, Palestinian Hussein Khattab, was convicted — in absentia — of being involved in the murders of members of Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad.

Under the Lebanese law, the convicts have the right to appeal while any death sentence needs the endorsement of both the prime minister and the president for implementation.

More than 70 people have been arrested on suspicions of links with Israeli intelligence services during a 2009 operation to track down and eradicate Tel Aviv’s espionage rings in Lebanon.

MRS/MB

VIDEO: How U.S. & Israeli Duplicity Operates in Plain Sight with Impunity

Jeff Gates along with Anthony Lawson produce this startling new video that is an absolute necessity for every American who genuinely loves his country and knows something has gone very very wrong. In Jeff’s own words:

What I tell people is that our specialty is enabling people to grasp “how” this duplicity operates in plain sight and, to date, with impunity. With that knowledge, they can sort out for themselves Who and Why. Absent that knowledge, they’re left adrift in the domain of conspiracy theorists, hate-mongers and such. We see this knowledge as essential in the transition to the Knowledge Society.

Don’t forget to join our Facebook fan page at: http://www.facebook.com/criminalstate !

Source

Criminal State – Part One

Criminal State – Part Two

Criminal State – Part Three

Harbingers of Hitler via Barak Obama From A College History Professor

Recently, I stumbled across this draft from September 2009, unfortunately, I failed to obtain the source so I have no idea who wrote the essay.  This professor’s profound thoughts are relevant because they demonstrate that regular Americans are waking up, yet, not enough to make an effective change.  In other words, it would appear that this individual is attempting to fathom the horrors occurring at this moment in the country and those yet to come based on skewed history pertaining to Adolf Hitler.  Remember, the winners write our history.  Moreover, this individual still has faith in the election process, which has been proven time and again to have little or no effect on the people’s plight.   WW~

Obama/Hitler

I am a student of history. Professionally, I have written 15 books on history that have been published in six languages, and I have studied history all my life. I have come to think there is something monumentally large afoot, and I do not believe it is simply a banking crisis, or a mortgage crisis, or a credit crisis. Yes these exist, but they are merely single facets on a very large gemstone that is only now coming into a sharper focus.

Something of historic proportions is happening. I can sense it because I know how it feels, smells, what it looks like, and how people react to it. Yes, a perfect storm may be brewing, but there is something happening within our country that has been evolving for about ten to fifteen years. The pace has dramatically quickened in the past two. We demand and then codify into law the requirement that our banks make massive loans to people we know they can never pay back? Why? We learned just days ago that the Federal Reserve, which has little or no real oversight by anyone, has “loaned” two trillion dollars (that is $2,000,000,000,000) over the past few months, but will not tell us to whom or why or disclose the terms. That is our money. Yours and mine. And that is three times the $700 billion we all argued about so strenuously just this past September. Who has this money? Why do they have it? Why are the terms unavailable to us? Who asked for it? Who authorized it? I thought this was a government of “we the people,” who loaned our powers to our elected leaders. Apparently not.

We have spent two or more decades intentionally de-industrializing our economy.. Why? We have intentionally dumbed-down our schools, ignored our history, and no longer teach our founding documents, why we are exceptional, and why we are worth preserving. Students by and large cannot write, think critically, read, or articulate. Parents are not revolting, teachers are not picketing, school boards continue to back mediocrity. Why? We have now established the precedent of protesting every close election (violently in California over a proposition that is so controversial that it simply wants marriage to remain defined as between one man and one woman. Did you ever think such a thing possible just a decade ago?) We have corrupted our sacred political process by allowing unelected judges to write laws that radically change our way of life, and then mainstream Marxist groups like ACORN and others to turn our voting system into a banana republic. To what purpose? Now our mortgage industry is collapsing, housing prices are in free fall, major industries are failing, our banking system is on the verge of collapse, social security is nearly bankrupt, as is Medicare and our entire government. Our education system is worse than a joke (I teach college and I know precisely what I am talking about) – the list is staggering in its length, breadth, and depth..

It is potentially 1929 x ten…And we are at war with an enemy we cannot even name for fear of offending people of the same religion, who, in turn, cannot wait to slit the throats of your children if they have the opportunity to do so. And finally, we have elected a man that no one really knows anything about, who has never run so much as a Dairy Queen, let alone a town as big as Wasilla , Alaska .. All of his associations and alliances are with real radicals in their chosen fields of employment, and everything we learn about him, drip by drip, is unsettling if not downright scary (Surely you have heard him speak about his idea to create and fund a mandatory civilian defense force stronger than our military for use inside our borders? No? Oh, of course. The media would never play that for you over and over and then demand he answer it. Sarah Palin’s pregnant daughter and $150,000 wardrobe are more important.) Mr. Obama’s winning platform can be boiled down to one word: Change. Why? I have never been so afraid for my country and for my children as I am now. This man campaigned on bringing people together, something he has never, ever done in his professional life. In my assessment, Obama will divide us along philosophical lines, push us apart, and then try to realign the pieces into a new and different power structure. Change is indeed coming. And when it comes, you will never see the same nation again. And that is only the beginning..

As a serious student of history, I thought I would never come to experience what the ordinary, moral German must have felt in the mid-1930s In those times, the “savior” was a former smooth-talking rabble-rouser from the streets, about whom the average German knew next to nothing. What they should have known was that he was associated with groups that shouted, shoved, and pushed around people with whom they disagreed; he edged his way onto the political stage through great oratory. Conservative “losers” read it right now. And there were the promises. Economic times were tough, people were losing jobs, and he was a great speaker. And he smiled and frowned and waved a lot. And people, even newspapers, were afraid to speak out for fear that his “brown shirts” would bully and beat them into submission. Which they did – regularly. And then, he was duly elected to office, while a full-throttled economic crisis bloomed at hand – the Great Depression. Slowly, but surely he seized the controls of government power, person by person, department by department, bureaucracy by bureaucracy. The children of German citizens were at first, encouraged to join a Youth Movement in his name where they were taught exactly what to think. Later, they were required to do so. No Jews of course – How did he get people on his side? He did it by promising jobs to the jobless, money to the money-less, and rewards for the military-industrial complex. He did it by indoctrinating the children, advocating gun control, health care for all, better wages, better jobs, and promising to re-instill pride once again in the country, across Europe , and across the world. He did it with a compliant media – did you know that? And he did this all in the name of justice and …. . .. change. And the people surely got what they voted for. If you think I am exaggerating, look it up. It’s all there in the history books. So read your history books.

Many people of conscience objected in 1933 and were shouted down, called names, laughed at, and ridiculed. When Winston Churchill pointed out the obvious in the late 1930s while seated in the House of Lords in England (he was not yet Prime Minister), he was booed into his seat and called a crazy troublemaker. He was right, though. And the world came to regret that he was not listened to. Do not forget that Germany was the most educated, the most cultured country in Europe. It was full of music, art, museums, hospitals, laboratories, and universities. And yet, in less than six years (a shorter time span than just two terms of the U. S. presidency) it was rounding up its own citizens, killing others, abrogating its laws, turning children against parents, and neighbors against neighbors.. All with the best of intentions, of course. The road to Hell is paved with them.

As a practical thinker, one not overly prone to emotional decisions, I have a choice: I can either believe what the objective pieces of evidence tell me (even if they make me cringe with disgust); I can believe what history is shouting to me from across the chasm of seven decades; or I can hope I am wrong by closing my eyes, having another latte, and ignoring what is transpiring around me.. I choose to believe the evidence. No doubt some people will scoff at me, others laugh, or think I am foolish, naive, or both. To some degree, perhaps I am. But I have never been afraid to look people in the eye and tell them exactly what I believe-and why I believe it. I pray I am wrong. I do not think I am. Perhaps the only hope is our vote in the next elections.

IMAGES: American HELL In Afghanistan

The American military is losing in Afghanistan, miserably!  This reminds me of Vietnam all over again, only this time, the government and the media are blatantly lying to the American public about the actual number of casualties since 2003.  I don’t believe for one minute that just around 4000 soldiers have lost their lives; I dare say that the real body count is far higher.

The attached images are from the Islamic website THE UNJUST MEDIA – some images were too gruesome to post but can be seen at the link if you can stomach it!

THE UNJUST MEDIA also posts daily U.S. and Allied casualties in Afghanistan here – it would be interesting to compare their quotas to the MSM reports.

WW~

“Mass Casualties”: The Dark Underbelly of Occupation

(Photo: Staff Sgt. Jason Robertson / The U.S. Army); Edited: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t)

by Dahr Jamail

“Look around,” the drill sergeant said. “In a few years, or even a few months, several of you will be dead. Some of you will be severely wounded or so badly mutilated that your own mother can’t stand the sight of you. And for the real unlucky ones, you will come home so emotionally disfigured that you wish you had died over there.”

“It was Week 7 of basic training … eighteen years old and I was preparing myself to die,” said Michael Anthony in “Mass Casualties: A Young Medic’s True Story of Death, Deception and Dishonor in Iraq.” The book is more than a simple memoir about a difficult experience. It is an insider’s scathing testimony of an ongoing illegal and unethical military action in a distant, once-sovereign state, by the US. Perhaps, this fresh account will raise some outcry over an issue that has all but dropped out of the American public’s radar.

Following the family legacy of military service, Anthony enlisted in the military at 17. The image he had nurtured of the idealism of military life, however, ran aground upon his arrival in Iraq, where he served as a medic in an operating room (OR) at a US military base.

“Mass Casualties” is a collection of Anthony’s personal journal entries from his time in Iraq. It includes his introspections on and insights into the inherently irrational and meaningless nature of military life. The rawness of the narrative reveals how the occupation broke down the young soldier’s spirit and almost desensitized him into believing “my job isn’t to feel.”

The late historian and Author Howard Zinn held the book in high regard. “Michael Anthony’s memoir is not about the politics of Iraq. Instead it takes us deep inside the war, inside and outside the operation room, the barracks, the talk of the soldiers, the feeling of the situation … unique and powerful,” Zinn wrote.

The young author makes no attempt to shield the reader from the reality of war. In one instance, he gives a graphic description of working on an Iraqi patient who had received shrapnel from proximity to a suicide bomber. The shrapnel embedded in the patient’s body happened to be bone fragments of the suicide bomber.

“I’ve got a belly full of bacon and eggs and I’m about to have my arms elbow deep in someone’s stomach,” he wrote of his first days there, “In the OR we only do three surgeries at a time because that’s the number of beds we have. Even worse is that in one of our rooms we have two OR beds placed only a few feet apart. This means we’ll often have two surgeries going on at the same time in the same room. Not the most sterile setup in the world, but we’re short on staff and short on space, just not short on patients.”

Here is an account that chronicles the impact of war on the individual psyche as well as the collective consciousness of those that participate in it. We are shown the swift process of dehumanization that all soldiers undergo on the ground, to the extent that the lines distinguishing “friend” from enemy get blurred.

After hearing about a woman in his unit being “gang-banged” by three Marines at his base the soldier writes: “I wish I could just forget everything and go back to thinking that everyone in the military is an American hero. I wish I still had someone to look up to, although I know it’s impossible. None of it seems to make sense, and I can’t understand how people can do what they do.”

The author’s morale, like that of his peers, plummets within weeks of his arrival in Iraq. Nothing had prepared him for the melting of backgrounds and personalities that the Army is. His associates in the battle field are not easy people: “What an outfit: people in their thirties, married with children, all of them having affairs. One was a heroine addict; the other has slept with eleven men in the past three months. One guy tired to kill himself and another kidnapped a drug dealer. Alcoholics, chain smokers, compulsive gamblers – who am I to judge?”

The reader is exposed to the factors leading to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a serious condition that has been affecting veterans and active duty soldiers alike, in epidemic proportions since the beginning of the occupation.

Anthony writes of a suicide prevention class he and his fellow-soldiers are required to attend:

… they also tell us that people who are suicidal usually become depressed from big changes happening in their lives. They say that depressed people become withdrawn and will not enjoy everyday activities. They’ll sleep a lot. I couldn’t help but laugh when I heard this … because I looked around the room and everyone fit the criteria. We’ve all had a huge change in our lives coming to Iraq. Everyone here is withdrawn and sleeps as much as possible, and our everyday activities consist of running for our lives and working on near-death patients. Who wouldn’t be depressed and want to spend time alone? We work long hours at unpredictable times, and we see the same people twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. What I never understood from these classes is how are we supposed to spot the real suicidal people when everyone has suicidal symptoms?

There is a suicide attempt in his unit, but the higher-ups opt not to write it up because nobody wants the hassle of doing the paperwork.

Matters inevitably worsen under abusive commanders. While he is resigned to the binding contract that “… says that all my decisions are to be made by somebody else who is my superior,” he does not feel particularly comfortable about it. “I’ve seen him yell at a female soldier while she sobbed uncontrollably. This is the guy who’s supposed to be, I mean is, our leader in Iraq.”

When Anthony’s unit is moved from Mosul to Al-Anbar province in central Iraq to set up a new hospital, the unit commander leads the men to believe that he would be working at another hospital for a month, but actually he was back in the US taking a class at a war college because he needed the course in order to be promoted. The medic finds it unconscionable: “I start to feel nauseous – we are in the middle of fighting a war and our leader has given himself a month-long VACATION.”

As the book progresses, the shift in Anthony’s stance from his original reverence of the military to a defined mistrust of it, becomes evident. So much so that he said, “All it took for me to respect someone in the military was for that person to refuse a direct order.”

The irony is not lost on the reader who sees the young soldier getting apprehensive about returning to civilian life and autonomous decision making, as his year of service draws to a close.

Grappling with his own guilt, he has difficulty reconciling himself to the sentiments behind the care packages that come from home. “These people are sending us everything they have, and most of us don’t deserve it. They aren’t sending provisions to the heroes they think we are. It is going to us doing shit jobs and others who are criminals; people doing drugs, committing crimes, molesters, adulterers, people doing anything they can to only help themselves. The worst part about these old people sending me this package is they think they’re helping.”

Mindful of his own boyhood spent idolizing the Army and playing with GI Joes in the backyard, Anthony is filled with remorse: “Soon the letters from the third and fourth graders will start to come. Those are the most depressing of them all. Kids writing letters supporting something they know nothing about, only that they’re told to support their country and the war.”

If for nothing else, “Mass Casualties” gains immense importance in its honest portrayal of a young soldier’s vulnerability as he struggles hard to cope with his shattered illusion about the Army. It is not difficult to share his angst as he reflects, “I think about why I’m fighting this war and my eyes tear up. I think of all the people we’ve killed. I think of all the people’s families – mothers, fathers, siblings – and how they’ll never see them again … I think about the war and I feel nothing. I think about life and death, mine and everyone else’s, and I feel nothing. I think about myself and I don’t care if I live or die. On these nights, mortars go off and I won’t get out of bed. I’ll lie in bed as the bombs go off. I tell myself it doesn’t matter if I live or die, nothing matters – I like it when I feel nothing.”

To “take the edge off” being in Iraq, he tries everything from heavy smoking to excessive pain medication and reported, “Here’s what my days are like, I wake up in the morning and smoke to get rid of my headache, then I walk to work, in a hundred and twenty degrees of heat, and then spend all day covered in blood. Then I go home, take some pills, and fall asleep.”

In a frank admission of his fears and lamenting the breaking of his spirit he said, “We’re warriors on the battlefield but cowards in our own minds and hearts.”

Anthony was back from Iraq and driving home from a lecture he had delivered on PTSD and suicidal veterans when he learned of the Fort Hood shootings [allegedly] by Nidal Hassan that left dozens dead and wounded.

He told Truthout that the incident came as no surprise to him and, “Stories like that reminded me that there’s absolutely nothing a soldier can do to not get deployed overseas. The Army has a policy that if a soldier says they’re suicidal or homicidal, they still get sent overseas. Why? Because if every soldier who said they’re suicidal or homicidal didn’t get sent overseas then anyone who doesn’t want to go would just say they’re suicidal or homicidal. So the Army in turn just sends everyone, no matter what.

“I had a friend who didn’t want to go to Iraq so he purposely failed five drug tests in a row (smoking pot and doing coke) he still got sent to Iraq. There was one guy in my unit who didn’t want to go to Iraq, he told our commanders he was suicidal, they said he still had to go. The soldier then went and got a swastika tattooed on his shoulder, he told the commanders that he was racist and hated everyone except white people; commanders said he still had to go to Iraq. The next day he takes a bottle of pills and tries to kill himself – and I’m sure if he were physically capable of it, he still would have had to go to Iraq. There was a guy in my unit who was on anti-depressant medication; our commanders said they couldn’t deploy him on that medication that he should stop taking it. The next day he tries to stab someone and is put in jail, he still went to Iraq with us. There are more and more of the same stories … There’s literally nothing you can do to not go to Iraq and I think that’s why suicidal and homicidal patients aren’t getting the care they need because before it’s time to go overseas, you’re going no matter what, and after you get back, the government doesn’t care.”

Rather than feeling happy or proud of his time deployed in Iraq, Anthony captures a feeling that must be all too common for returning troops who simply want out.

Recounting to Truthout one particular occasion when he realized that things had gone very wrong with him, Anthony said, “Everyone comes home changed. For me I noticed it my first week back. I went to visit my brother in San Diego and it was the end of October and for Halloween my brother and I went to this bar … My only concern was chain-smoking and chain-drinking … We go to this bar and I’ve just gotten back and I’m still in this mood like, “Nobody knows what it was like. Nobody knows where I just came from and went through.” My brother and I go to this empty table and we start drinking beers and I’m chain smoking cigarettes, then three biker guys come up to us, they look at me and say, ‘You guys are at our table’ and as the guy says ‘table’ I turn around and blow my cigarette smoke in his face while saying, “Table was empty when we sat down, go find another one.” It all went downhill from there. One of the guys put his hand on my hand (which was holding my beer) and pushes it away; another guy turns his back towards me and starts roughly leaning towards me as if to butt me out, and at this I get angry and in my head. I’m telling myself ‘These guys have no idea where I just came from; these dumb bikers think they’re so tough, I’d like to see them overseas’ etc. And I’m getting madder and madder and we’re saying things back and forth and finally I’m so angry, that I turn my empty beer bottle over and I lift it up to smash it over this guys head … From there I just started laughing; I stubbed my cigarette out, flicked it at the guy and walked away. It wasn’t until a few minutes later when I calmed down and grasped how crazy it was what I was about to do. Then I realized that maybe I didn’t return home the way I [I was when I] left.”

“Mass Casualties” is not the first and is not going to be the last indictment of the US occupation of Iraq. There have been films, reports, books, blogs and dozens of testimonies at Winter Soldier events that have exposed various ugly aspects of the occupation as witnessed and enforced by the “heroes” in uniform. Each tale comes with its share of guilt, despair and remorse at having been complicit in wanton destruction under an obviously false façade of patriotism.

Perhaps, this latest account in its unsophisticated and gut-level rejection of the lie that the US military has come to represent will make people sit up and take notice … and action.

Bhaswati Sengupta contributed to this report.

Source

Afterthoughts: Austin Incident possible “false flag”?

False flag operations are covert operations which are designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities.  Wikipedia

It is quite possible and even more likely probable that the tragedy in Austin, Texas was the government’s latest “false flag” attack on the American people. I find this bizarre incident just a bit too ‘convenient’ being that it occurred right around tax season. And I mean no disrespect to the dead and the innocents that died as the result of Mr. Stack’s desperate actions.  Yet, past history leaves the question begging for a thorough investigation into the real truth behind today’s horrible event.  We are dealing with a corrupt, criminally insane institution masquerading under the United States Government, which is accountable to no one especially the American people.  We also know that these evil people are capable of committing the most reprehensible atrocities against American citizens (9/11, MK-Ultra) to achieve their draconian aims, and until the actual truth is known about the Austin Incident the U.S. government and its minions should remain the “usual” suspects.

More on this later when additional information is revealed…

Whitewraithe~