Could this be our future?

equilibrium

Revised – 6/11/2014, additional content in navy blue font.

Increasingly, I still believe Hollywood is sending the public subliminal messages about the future that has already been planned by the psychotic masters in the Jewish world order.

Case in point, is a movie made in 2002 titled Equilibrium starring Christian Bale and Sean Bean.  Here is the synopsis from the Internet Movie Data Base:

Equilibrium is set in the futuristic, and dystopian city-state of Libria. The film explains how, in the early years of the 21st century, a devastating Third World War breaks out, the impact of which brings civilizations across the planet to their knees. After the war ends, world leaders fear that the human race cannot possibly survive a Fourth World War, and so set about building a new society which is free of conflict.

Believing that human emotion is responsible for man’s inhumanity to man, the new leaders ban all materials deemed likely to stimulate strong emotions, including art, music, and literature. These materials are rated “EC-10″ for “emotional content” (a reference to the MPAA film rating system), and are typically destroyed by immediate incineration. Furthermore, all citizens of Libria are required to take regular injections, called “intervals,” of a liquid drug called Prozium, collected at the distribution centers known as “Equilibrium”.

Libria is governed by the Tetragrammaton Council, which is led by a reclusive figurehead known as “Father”. Father never interacts with anyone outside the ruling council, but his image is omnipresent throughout the city in a strong cult of personality. The Tetragrammaton Council strives to create identical lives for all Librians and uses its police state apparatus to enforce unity and conformity. At the pinnacle of Librian law enforcement are the Grammaton Clerics, who are trained in the deadly martial art of Gun Kata, an art which teaches users to predict the actions of opponents during firearm combat. The Clerics exist for the purpose of locating and destroying EC-10 materials and for pursuing, apprehending, and, if necessary, terminating “sense-offenders”people guilty of feeling emotions.

Despite the efforts of the police and Clerics, a resistance movement exists in Libria, known as “The Underground”. Members of this movement are responsible for terrorist activity against Libria, specifically against the Prozium factories. The leaders of the Underground believe that if they can disrupt the production and distribution of Prozium for a short period of time, even a single day, then the Librians will rise up and destroy the Tetragrammaton Council. The Underground operates within Libria itself, but also has contact with resistance groups residing in “The Nethers”, the ruins of cities destroyed during World War III. These outsiders hoard objects and artifacts from the old society before World War III, including art and literature. Subsequently, they are the targets of Librian death squads composed of police and Clerics.

The film’s protagonist, Grammaton Cleric First Class John Preston (Christian Bale), is Libria’s highest ranking cleric. He is a widower whose wife (Maria Pia Calzone) was executed after being revealed to be a sense offender, leaving him with two children, Robbie (Matthew Harbour) and Lisa (Emily Siewert). After a raid on a group of resistance members in The Nethers, Preston notices that his partner, Grammaton Cleric First Class Errol Partridge (Sean Bean), has personally taken a copy of the poems of Yeats under false pretenses. Preston discovers that Partridge has not turned the book over for destruction and follows him to a ruined cathedral in The Nethers, where Partridge speaks of emotion and forces Preston to aid him in suicide by cop. Shortly afterwards, Preston accidentally breaks the vial of his morning dose of Prozium, and begins to experience emotions.

Preston is assigned a new partner, the career-conscious Brandt (Taye Diggs). Following a standard police raid on a Librian woman, Mary O’Brien (Emily Watson), who has stopped taking Prozium, his emotional confusion is exacerbated during her interrogation. He first acts out of emotion when he makes an excuse not to execute a puppy in The Nethers. Preston has by now ceased taking Prozium and is forced to try and maintain his monotone and emotionless façade in front of his son and the increasingly suspicious Brandt. Over the course of the film, Preston’s behavior increasingly mirrors that of Partridge in the beginning, even to the point of repeated dialogue.

Soon, Preston is involved in illegal activities. During one visit to the Nethers, he is forced to kill several Librian policemen who find the rescued puppy in his car. Brandt, having seen Preston re-arranging his desk (signaling a dislike of conformity) and refusing to personally execute resistance members during a raid in the Nethers, becomes more suspicious. In consequence, Preston is summoned before Vice-Counsel DuPont (Angus Macfadyen), and explains that he is attempting to infiltrate the Resistance in order to destroy it. DuPont tells him that he has heard rumors of a cleric attempting to join the Resistance, and Preston promises to find this traitor. Preston soon makes contact with the Resistance. He agrees to assassinate Father (Sean Pertwee), an act which will create enough confusion for the Underground to detonate bombs in Libria’s Prozium factories and hopefully bring down the Tetragrammaton Council. However, watching Mary O’Brien’s execution in Libria’s furnaces causes Preston to weep uncontrollably, and Brandt arrests him.

Brandt brings Preston before DuPont; Preston, however, tricks DuPont into believing Brandt was the criminal. Apparently cleared, Preston is released. He returns home to destroy his stashed Prozium before police find it, and is confronted by his young son, who reveals to Preston that he and his sister have not taken Prozium for some time, and have already hidden his cache of Prozium. As part of an elaborate plot formed with the Underground, the leaders of the Resistance turn themselves in to Preston, who persuades DuPont to grant him an audience with Father.

Preston arrives for his audience with Father, and is confronted by Father in a sudden reversal. Via a telescreen, Father speaks to Preston, revealing that he has been aware of Preston’s sense-offense, and has staged Brandt’s arrest in order to lull Preston into a false sense of security and allow him to think that his assassination scheme can go ahead. The face on the telescreen changes, revealing the face of Vice-Council DuPont, who explains that the real Father died years before, and that the Tetragrammaton Council elected DuPont as the new Head of State.

Preston, however, embarks on a rampage using concealed pistols that he uses in order to reach Brandt and DuPont. Preston and Brandt face each other using paired short swords (similar in size and shape to the Japanese wakizashi), but Preston easily dispatches Brandt. Preston and DuPont then confront each other with handguns in a battle of Gun Kata masters, during which Preston manages to get the upper hand and kills DuPont. Preston then destroys the propaganda machines which broadcast across Libria, and the device which projects holographic images of Father. Realizing that the Tetragrammaton Council is faced with a crisis, the Underground detonates their bombs and the prisoners are released.

The film ends with a riot signaling the destruction of the Librian government.

When this film was released I was clueless about the true reality of the world, however, over the years and since coming to the truth, I realized that this movie was a huge “red flag” indicating what might be our own dystopian future that we are partially immersed in, already.  Overcrowded cities the world over, abject poverty, starvation, and the continuing destablization of the middle east are only a few indications that a dystopian future is right around the corner.

For instance, the present day rulers have done their dead-level best to remove the most effective and viable human emotions (sense offenders) from our lives through the half-century use of fluoride in our drinking water.  We know it causes lethargy, malaise, fatigue, lower I.Q., and apathy.  Americans seem not to care about the corrupt, putrid state of the central government that robs them blind daily.  They submit to any and all rules, regulations and protocols without raising nary an eyebrow scared to death that they might be singled out as non-conformists.  And very, very few stand up to the police jack-boots that trample on their civil rights.  Is it any wonder why massive groups of Americans are not instigating a revolution?

The Tetragrammaton Council in the film is straight from the Hebrew bible since it names their g_d, YHWH, which most Jews are forbidden to pronounce the name of God.  So, Father in the film, is YHWH, who the Librians worship and revere.  Think of living under the future Noahide Laws, which I’ve written about and covered here in this blog.  (You can find sources under ‘Static Knowledge’ in the sidebar.)

The Clerics are basically our current version of the para-militarized police forces throughout the country now.  Since the film was released in 2002 only one year after 9/11,  it had to be a foreshadowing or harbinger of things to come within the confines of the law and justice system in America, which is quite chilling to realize.

The daily drug Prozium which the characters use in the film to keep their emotions in check sounds really familiar to the anti-depressant Prozac that was supposed to be a miracle drug for depression when it first reached the drug market in the mid 1990s, yet, it caused psychosis in numerous patients such as this blogger.  Now there are a myriad of drugs for depression for both children and adults to keep us further anesthetized to the world around us so that we don’t care about much of anything.  Not to mention, further poisoning our children with dozens of vaccinations before they reach 18 destroying their immune system and their capacity for acquiring knowledge.

Can you imagine how wonderful we would begin to feel without fluoride in our water and poisoned food in our daily diet?  It would be like getting a new lease on life.  Only then would conscious, caring adults begin to wake up and realize what has been done to them and their children.  I dare say we would be closer than ever to revolting against this criminal, corrupt government of oligarchs and their Jewish masters.

If the film, Equilibrium, is any indication of a future real world, although I doubt everyone will be so well-dressed and clean, then you can just about be assured that the entire population will be nothing more than mindless automaton slaves in the worst case scenario.  All humanity will cease to exist.

Kristen Harris produced an excellent video of the film to the music of VAST with their song, “Here.”  Lyrics are open to interpretation and subjective, but the words describe the events of the film in eloquent detail.

HERE – by Vast

Where do I put the shame?
It feels like a broken toy
I can’t play with anymore

Where do I put the hate?
To a pixelated screen
I can’t watch anymore

All I know is that I’m here
Drifting somewhere in the vast
Somewhere in eternity
And I never want to leave

Where do I put the books?
There’s so many I could read
But they all are filled with lies

Where do I put the lies?
There’s so many I could say
But it seems they’re in the books

I have faith that you’re out there
Living high up in the vast
Somewhere in eternity
And you’re never going to leave

Have I been telling lies to myself?
Hold me now, you know I am so afraid to be at all
Have I been telling lies to myself?
Hold me now, you know I am so afraid to love at all

I looked up and I saw the moon
Is it the same one that betrayed you?
I looked up and I saw my place
I looked in and I felt no hate

Where do I put the love?
Oh, where do I put the love?
Yeah, where do I put the love?

Songwriters
Jon Pka Vast Crosby

Published by
WB MUSIC CORP.

If you’ve never seen the film you owe it to yourself to watch it and see if you notice the parallels to today’s real world.

Whitewraithe~

 

Are People Being Thrown In Psychiatric Wards For Their Political Views?

Mental Health Diagnoses Are Sometimes Politically-Motivated

Many psychologists and psychiatrists are good people, who are only trying to help their patients.

But the Nazi government substantially supported psychologists … many of whom, in turn, espoused extermination of the people they considered to be “racially and cognitively compromised”.

Soviet psychiatrists famously aided Stalin in applying fake insanity diagnoses to political dissenters.

American psychologists created the American program of torture which was specially-crafted to produce false confessions to justify U.S. military policy. And see this.

And authoritarian American psychologists are eager to label anyone “taking a cynical stance toward politics, mistrusting authority, endorsing democratic practices, … and displaying an inquisitive, imaginative outlook” as worthy of a trip to the insane asylum. (Those traits may also get one labeled as a potential terrorist.)

Even psychologists with good intentions can erroneously label people delusional simply because they themselves make bad assumptions.

There is even a label for this – the “Martha Mitchell Effect” – defined as:

The process by which a psychiatrist, psychologist, or other mental health clinician mistakes the patient’s perception of real events as delusional and misdiagnoses accordingly.

The authors of a paper on this phenomenon (Bell, V., Halligan, P.W., Ellis, H.D. (2003) Beliefs About Delusions. The Psychologist, 6 (8), 418-422) conclude:

Sometimes, improbable reports are erroneously assumed to be symptoms of mental illness [due to a] failure or inability to verify whether the events have actually taken place, no matter how improbable intuitively they might appear to the busy clinician.

In other words, psychologists who haven’t taken the time to examine for themselves the claims of their patients will tend to label as delusional anything which they “intuitively” feel is improbable.  As such, psychologists and psychiatrists are just as prone to acting out their irrational prejudices as anyone else … unless they take the time to investigate and educate themselves.

Governments Indefinitely Detaining Citizens In Psychiatric Wards Without Due Process of Law

As such, detention in psych wards on mere “suspicion” of posing a danger – without due process of law – is troubling.

For example, former marine Brandon Raub was just carted off and locked in a psychiatric ward for his allegedly “anti-government” Facebook posts.

AP reports today:

Police – acting under a state law that allows emergency, temporary psychiatric commitments upon the recommendation of a mental health professional – took Raub to the John Randolph Medical Center in Hopewell. He was not charged with any crime.

***

Col. Thierry Dupuis, the county police chief, said Raub was taken into custody upon the recommendation of mental health crisis intervention workers. He said the action was taken under the state’s emergency custody statute, which allows a magistrate to order the civil detention and psychiatric evaluation of a person who is considered potentially dangerous.

Claire Swinney of New Zealand was also held in a psychiatric ward and called “delusional” for criticizing the government.  Susan Lindauer was held under the Patriot Act for a year at Carswell Air Force Base, where psychiatric drugs were pushed on her.

The Daily Mail notes:

The [British] Government has established a shadowy new national anti-terrorist unit to protect VIPs, with the power to detain suspects indefinitely using mental health laws.

***

The team’s psychiatrists and psychologists then have the power to order treatment – including forcibly detaining suspects in secure psychiatric units.

Using these powers, the unit can legally detain people for an indefinite period without trial, criminal charges or even evidence of a crime being committed and with very limited rights of appeal.

Until now it has been the exclusive decision of doctors and mental health professionals to determine if someone should be forcibly detained.

But the new unit uses the police to identify suspects – increasing fears the line is being blurred between criminal investigation and doctors’ clinical decisions.

***

Scotland Yard, which runs the shadowy unit, refuses to discuss how many suspects have been forcibly hospitalised by the team because of “patient confidentiality”.

***

The purpose of the centre is “to evaluate and manage the risk posed to prominent people by…those who engage in inappropriate or threatening communications or behaviours in the context of abnormally intense preoccupations, many [Many? That means that some are not] of which arise from psychotic illness.”

Who gets to decide what “inappropriate” or “threatening” means?  What if a whistleblower has information that a member of parliament has engaged in bribes?  Would trying to reveal such information constitute “inappropriate or threatening communications or behaviours” in the context of “abnormally intense preoccupations” with that MP’s illegal actions?

The Mail continues:

So-called ‘sectioning’ allows a patient to be held for up to six months before a further psychological assessment. Patients are then reviewed every year to determine if they can be released.

***

Human rights activists fear the team, whose existence has never been publicised, may be being used as a way to detain suspected terrorists without having to put evidence before the courts.

***

Last night human rights group Liberty said the secret unit represented a new threat to civil liberties.

Policy director Gareth Crossman said: “There is a grave danger of this being used to deal with people where there is insufficient evidence for a criminal prosecution.

“This blurs the line between medical decisions and police actions. If you are going to allow doctors to take people’s liberty away, they have to be independent. That credibility is undermined when the doctors are part of the same team as the police.

“This raises serious concerns. First that you have a unit that allows police investigation to lead directly to people being sectioned without any kind of criminal proceedings.

“Secondly, it is being done under the umbrella of anti-terrorism at a time when the Government is looking at ways to detain terrorists without putting them on trial.”

***

The team examined thousands of cases and liaised with the FBI, the US Secret Service, the Capitol Hill Police, which protects Congressmen and Senators, and the Swedish and Norwegian secret services.

***

Shadow Health Secretary Andrew Lansley said: “The Government is trying to bring in a wider definition of mental disorder and is resisting exclusions which ensure that people cannot be treated as mentally disordered on the grounds of their cultural, political or religious beliefs.

“When you hear they are also setting up something like this police unit, it raises questions about quite what their intentions are.

“The use of mental health powers of detention should be confined to the purposes of treatment. But the Government wants to be able to detain someone who is mentally disordered even when the treatment would have no benefit.

“Combined with the idea that someone could be classed as mentally ill on the grounds of their religious beliefs, it is a very worrying scenario.”

Indeed, the whole “indefinite detention” process (which Americans living on American soil are subject to) can be based on circular reasoning:

The government’s indefinite detention policy – stripped of it’s spin – is literally insane, and based on circular reasoning. Stripped of p.r., this is the actual policy:

  • If you are an enemy combatant or a threat to national security, we will detain you indefinitely until the war is over
  • But trust us, we know you are an enemy combatant and a threat to national security

See how that works?

(This is an analogy.  We are not accusing psych wards of using torture.  However, they do often use powerful psychiatric drugs on patients … which can elicit false confessions.)

Are we going to slide into Soviet levels of psychiatric detention of political dissidents?

Unless the spread of psychiatric detention without due process of law is checked, the mere belief that the government is interfering with your liberty may become grounds for locking you away.

Source

ILLEGAL EVERYTHING IN AMERICA?

I’m a Criminal, You’re a Criminal

by Katherine Mangu-Ward

Reason.com

Harvey Silverglate, a Boston-based criminal defense and civil liberties attorney, is the co-founder of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, which fights speech codes on college campuses. He is also the author, most recently, of Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent (Encounter Books), a book about “how the United States Department of Justice targets all segments of civil society by means of abusive prosecutions based upon unacceptably vague federal criminal statutes and regulations.”

Senior Editor Katherine Mangu-Ward spoke with Silverglate in November.

Q: When did you notice that people were committing crimes without knowing it?

A: Starting in the mid-1980s, I noticed in my federal criminal cases that people who were being indicted would ask, “What the hell did I do to get myself indicted?” We would read the indictment, and neither I nor my law partners could figure out why the feds considered what this person did to be a crime. We weren’t contesting that the client did what he was charged with, but we couldn’t figure out when what he did had become a federal crime.

This is the same period of time when I started keeping track of what I later realized was a related phenomenon. In universities in the mid-1980s, students were being charged under these incredibly vague speech and harassment codes on campuses when the student was engaging in what the student—and I—considered to be normal college-age behavior: saying things that were provocative, sometimes kind of sharp, sometimes insulting.

I can’t help but think that they’re related, that they have something to do with a decreasing emphasis on language with real meaning, that there is a kind of corruption of the English language that enables these kinds of codes and federal statutes to wreak havoc in the lives of people who would not normally be on notice that they’re doing something that can get them thrown out of school or into federal prison.

Read more here

For more Defending civil liberties videos, click here

http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/defending-civil-liberties/john-stossels-illegal-everything-.html#

 

10 Reasons Why America Is No Longer The Land Of The Free

While the country was fixated on sports and other fluff, the politicians were conniving and colluding behind our backs to further enslave the people. No one was minding the store and now we are getting what we deserve. And it's up to US to take back our country and hang the criminals in Washington!

By Jonathan Turley, Published: January 13

Every year, the State Department issues reports on individual rightsin other countries, monitoring the passage of restrictive laws and regulations around the world. Iran, for example, has been criticized for denying fair public trials and limiting privacy, while Russia has been taken to task for undermining due process. Other countries have been condemned for the use of secret evidence and torture.Even as we pass judgment on countries we consider unfree, Americans remain confident that any definition of a free nation must include their own — the land of free. Yet, the laws and practices of the land should shake that confidence. In the decade since Sept. 11, 2001, this country has comprehensively reduced civil liberties in the name of an expanded security state. The most recent example of this was the National Defense Authorization Act, signed Dec. 31, which allows for the indefinite detention of citizens. At what point does the reduction of individual rights in our country change how we define ourselves?

While each new national security power Washington has embraced was controversial when enacted, they are often discussed in isolation. But they don’t operate in isolation. They form a mosaic of powers under which our country could be considered, at least in part, authoritarian. Americans often proclaim our nation as a symbol of freedom to the world while dismissing nations such as Cuba and China as categorically unfree. Yet, objectively, we may be only half right. Those countries do lack basic individual rights such as due process, placing them outside any reasonable definition of “free,” but the United States now has much more in common with such regimes than anyone may like to admit.These countries also have constitutions that purport to guarantee freedoms and rights. But their governments have broad discretion in denying those rights and few real avenues for challenges by citizens — precisely the problem with the new laws in this country.The list of powers acquired by the U.S. government since 9/11 puts us in rather troubling company.

Assassination of U.S. citizens

President Obama has claimed, as President George W. Bush did before him, the right to order the killing of any citizen considered a terrorist or an abettor of terrorism. Last year, he approved the killing of U.S. citizen Anwar al-Awlaqi and another citizen under this claimed inherent authority. Last month, administration officials affirmed that power, stating that the president can order the assassination of any citizen whom he considers allied with terrorists. (Nations such as Nigeria, Iran and Syria have been routinely criticized for extrajudicial killings of enemies of the state.)

Indefinite detention

Under the law signed last month, terrorism suspects are to be held by the military; the president also has the authority to indefinitely detain citizens accused of terrorism. While the administration claims that this provision only codified existing law, experts widely contest this view, and the administration has opposed efforts to challenge such authority in federal courts. The government continues to claim the right to strip citizens of legal protections based on its sole discretion. (China recently codified a more limited detention law for its citizens, while countries such as Cambodia have been singled out by the United States for “prolonged detention.”)

Arbitrary justice

The president now decides whether a person will receive a trial in the federal courts or in a military tribunal, a system that has been ridiculed around the world for lacking basic due process protections. Bush claimed this authority in 2001, and Obama has continued the practice. (Egypt and China have been denounced for maintaining separate military justice systems for selected defendants, including civilians.)

Warrantless searches

The president may now order warrantless surveillance, including a new capability to force companies and organizations to turn over information on citizens’ finances, communications and associations. Bush acquired this sweeping power under the Patriot Act in 2001, and in 2011, Obama extended the power, including searches of everything from business documents to library records. The government can use “national security letters” to demand, without probable cause, that organizations turn over information on citizens — and order them not to reveal the disclosure to the affected party. (Saudi Arabia and Pakistan operate under laws that allow the government to engage in widespread discretionary surveillance.)

Secret evidence

The government now routinely uses secret evidence to detain individuals and employs secret evidence in federal and military courts. It also forces the dismissal of cases against the United States by simply filing declarations that the cases would make the government reveal classified information that would harm national security — a claim made in a variety of privacy lawsuits and largely accepted by federal judges without question. Even legal opinions, cited as the basis for the government’s actions under the Bush and Obama administrations, have been classified. This allows the government to claim secret legal arguments to support secret proceedings using secret evidence. In addition, some cases never make it to court at all. The federal courts routinely deny constitutional challenges to policies and programs under a narrow definition of standing to bring a case.

War crimes

The world clamored for prosecutions of those responsible for waterboarding terrorism suspects during the Bush administration, but the Obama administration said in 2009 that it would not allow CIA employees to be investigated or prosecuted for such actions. This gutted not just treaty obligations but the Nuremberg principles of international law. When courts in countries such as Spain moved to investigate Bush officials for war crimes, the Obama administration reportedly urged foreign officials not to allow such cases to proceed, despite the fact that the United States has long claimed the same authority with regard to alleged war criminals in other countries. (Various nations have resisted investigations of officials accused of war crimes and torture. Some, such as Serbia and Chile, eventually relented to comply with international law; countries that have denied independent investigations include Iran, Syria and China.)

Secret court

The government has increased its use of the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which has expanded its secret warrants to include individuals deemed to be aiding or abetting hostile foreign governments or organizations. In 2011, Obama renewed these powers, including allowing secret searches of individuals who are not part of an identifiable terrorist group. The administration has asserted the right to ignore congressional limits on such surveillance. (Pakistan places national security surveillance under the unchecked powers of the military or intelligence services.)

Immunity from judicial review

Like the Bush administration, the Obama administration has successfully pushed for immunity for companies that assist in warrantless surveillance of citizens, blocking the ability of citizens to challenge the violation of privacy. (Similarly, China has maintained sweeping immunity claims both inside and outside the country and routinely blocks lawsuits against private companies.)

Continual monitoring of citizens

The Obama administration has successfully defended its claim that it can use GPS devices to monitor every move of targeted citizens without securing any court order or review. (Saudi Arabia has installed massive public surveillance systems, while Cuba is notorious for active monitoring of selected citizens.)

Extraordinary renditions

The government now has the ability to transfer both citizens and noncitizens to another country under a system known as extraordinary rendition, which has been denounced as using other countries, such as Syria, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Pakistan, to torture suspects. The Obama administration says it is not continuing the abuses of this practice under Bush, but it insists on the unfettered right to order such transfers — including the possible transfer of U.S. citizens.

These new laws have come with an infusion of money into an expanded security system on the state and federal levels, including more public surveillance cameras, tens of thousands of security personnel and a massive expansion of a terrorist-chasing bureaucracy.

Some politicians shrug and say these increased powers are merely a response to the times we live in. Thus, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) could declare in an interview last spring without objection that “free speech is a great idea, but we’re in a war.” Of course, terrorism will never “surrender” and end this particular “war.”

Other politicians rationalize that, while such powers may exist, it really comes down to how they are used. This is a common response by liberals who cannot bring themselves to denounce Obama as they did Bush. Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), for instance, has insisted that Congress is not making any decision on indefinite detention: “That is a decision which we leave where it belongs — in the executive branch.”

And in a signing statement with the defense authorization bill, Obama said he does not intend to use the latest power to indefinitely imprison citizens. Yet, he still accepted the power as a sort of regretful autocrat.

An authoritarian nation is defined not just by the use of authoritarian powers, but by the ability to use them. If a president can take away your freedom or your life on his own authority, all rights become little more than a discretionary grant subject to executive will.

The framers lived under autocratic rule and understood this danger better than we do. James Madison famously warned that we needed a system that did not depend on the good intentions or motivations of our rulers: “If men were angels, no government would be necessary.”

Benjamin Franklin was more direct. In 1787, a Mrs. Powel confronted Franklin after the signing of the Constitution and asked, “Well, Doctor, what have we got — a republic or a monarchy?” His response was a bit chilling: “A republic, Madam, if you can keep it.”

Since 9/11, we have created the very government the framers feared: a government with sweeping and largely unchecked powers resting on the hope that they will be used wisely.

The indefinite-detention provision in the defense authorization bill seemed to many civil libertarians like a betrayal by Obama. While the president had promised to veto the law over that provision, Levin, a sponsor of the bill, disclosed on the Senate floor that it was in fact the White House that approved the removal of any exception for citizens from indefinite detention.

Dishonesty from politicians is nothing new for Americans. The real question is whether we are lying to ourselves when we call this country the land of the free.

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro professor of public interest law at George Washington University.

Source: Washington Post

John Kaminski does it again with this brilliant essay: THE CORRECT ANSWER

Why does everyone remain blind to the obvious?

By John Kaminski

pseudoskylax@gmail.com

http://johnkaminski.info/

When you’re asking the wrong question, you never get the right answer. The question is not “who and what is Al-Qaida?” The question is — who hired them.

If you live long enough, you see the same stories, generation after generation — credit manipulation causes depression and starvation, followed by war and weapons based economic recovery; the names may change but the situations and scams do not, from the French Revolution forward to today.

And if you look hard enough, you discover that the people really running the world are not the familiar names you read in the newspapers. You also realize that stories about those famous names are really endless and irrelevant distractions from the more important question that needs to be asked:

Who is responsible for all this confusion? All they talk about is peace. And all we get is war. Is this the human paradigm? Is that why nothing ever gets fixed in the world?

Yes, it’s because the real questions are never asked. The real criminals are never identified.

Why are they never identified? Because the real criminals own the media. Every story you ever read is what good guys they are, and not about what colossal crimes they have committed. The same is so very true about Americans, who believe they are benevolent heroes, when in reality they have accounted for more unjust murders of innocent people than any other country in history. All in the name of freedom and democracy. How did this happen?

The answer is simple. You know what it is. The people we have been taught not to mention in polite company control every aspect of our lives, and if we mention them in a derogatory way, our lives are then destroyed . . . economically, socially, and in other ways that are worse.

Even the best reporters on the Internet maintain the fiction that it is countries which actually run the world, when for at least the last hundred years those really in charge have been the international money lenders, who have owned and ruled every king and president who has reigned during this period. But this is not reported on, not even by our best reporters, who either know what they have to do to keep their jobs, or they lose their jobs.

I can phrase this question in an even more vivid way. Name me one company, one industry, one profession . . . that is not owned outright or totally manipulated from behind the scenes by Jews? The Catholic church joined the club hundreds of years ago when it let the Rothschilds manage their money. Dupont? Monsanto? Bill Gates? Larry Page? All Jews.

Ezra Pound’s words resonate louder than ever.

“Since the Civil War, It has been useless to speak of the United States as an autonomous entity.”

Anybody who still draws a paycheck from a Jewish source (and that would include the U.S. government, certainly a Jewish source) better realize that by this very act they are no part of any solution, but part of the problem that is well on the way to destroying everything we ever loved or hoped to build.

Two things we must remember now in our political thinking.

1. The wrong side won World War II. Three Jewish countries got together to destroy the one country in world history that openly opposed this Jewish financial hammerlock on the world. These false pretext invasions of Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and a multitude of other countries would not have happened but for the result of World War II. At least they wouldn’t have happened driven by the U.S. military working for Israel.

2. Anyone who calls themselves a Jew subscribes to the philosophy that they have a right — no, a religious duty — to rob and kill or enslave all the non Jews of the world. This is clearly a pathology that is kept secret by the very commercial interests that are ruled by the insanity of this very philosophy. So when some liberal do-gooder with a degree from Jewish-controlled Harvard University tells you she’s acting in your best interests — and this applies to schools, medicine and practically every category there is — you better think again.

The vast majority of Internet writers who tiptoe around use of the world “Jew” are actually complicit in the coverup of Jewish control of the world by their play-it-safe don’t-want-to-jeopardize that ad-revenue-stream timidity.

“It’s just business,” they chirp, not realizing that each time they fail to call a Jew a Jew, it puts another nail in the collective coffin of humanity, which tries to remain, though comatose, decidedly and happily non Jewish.

So the answer to all of the world’s pressing problems — assuming that most of them can be fixed by the proper application of money — are directly hooked into this Jewish problem, which is control of reality from behind the scenes and by sophisticated technological media manipulation that keeps people locked into their trivialities and oblivious to the colossal murder plot now being executed throughout the world by the same families that have been doing essentially the same thing for hundreds of years.

And exactly what are they doing?

Well, think about what you have left. All that other stuff you used to have, they already took that. Your future earnings? They’ve already taken most of that, not to mention stolen most of the industries from your country that you might have worked for. What they are doing is what they have always done. They’re about to take the rest of what you have, and when they have that, what do you think they’ll do to you?

So now you have the answer. BFD. What are you going to do about it? Let them etch it on your tombstone?

It’s also very important to mention that this is not the problem of one country, or a few countries. It’s the problem of all countries. The countries who refuse to go along with these demonic world bankers, at least those nations which have not already been obliterated, remain under constant threat of sabotage and destabilization.

Always a pack of savage beasts since the Jewish whiskey sellers doused the blankets for the Pequot tribe with smallpox in 1639, Americans have become much better killers since the Jews took over completely, don’t you think?

I’m still trying to decide on the greatest Jewish achievement in American history. There is no shortage of nominees. So you get to decide. Was it:

1. The sabotaging of the U.S. Constitution by allowing the bankers who funded the Revolutionary War to retain control of U.S. currency? Or was it . . .

2. Fomenting the Civil War by first flooding the land with slaves at a high price, then destroying the fabric of fledgling America by insisting the slaves be free. (This destabilization plan is still in operation with unbridled immigration.)

3. Inventing the atomic bomb. Oh Fukushima.

4. Putting cancer-viruses in the polio vaccine.

5. Hiding Tesla’s discoveries, a decision which precipitated all of the petroleum wars of the 20th century and changed the course of world history for the far worse.

6. Killing Royal Rife. 100 percent success rate curing cancer with vibrational medicine in the 1930s. Think of the people who have been needlessly robbed and killed by Jewish doctors prescribing radiation and chemotherapy.

7. Television.

8. Fluoride.

9. The World Wars, totally unnecessary.

10. Ruination, prostitution and debauchment of all arts and sciences with the ulterior motive of making Jews superior when they clearly are not, can’t be because of their philosophy. That’s why they buy their Nobel Prizes.

Feel free to write in your own nomination. There is no shortage of evidence. It should eliminate the possibility of you ever asking the wrong question again. This will greatly increase the probability that you will finally, despite massive forces arrayed against you, acquire the correct answer.

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida preaching the message that no problem in the world can be authentically addressed without first analyzing tangents caused by Jewish perfidy, which has subverted and diminished every aspect of human endeavor throughout history. Support for his work is wholly derived from people who can understand what he’s saying and know what it means. http://johnkaminski.info/ 250 N. McCall Rd. #2, Englewood FL 34223 USA

PS — Don’t miss this important radio interview of Bruce Campbell by Carolyn Yeager

http://www.reasonradionetwork.com/programs/the-heretics%E2%80%99-hour

Source: email

Dr. Alan Sabrosky’s recent article, “Israel’s Hidden Faces,” removed from Veterans Today

but, thankfully forwarded from Northerntruthseeker -

 

Every so often, an article comes out that is absolutely dynamite, and paints a clear picture of exactly what we are up against, and exactly who is responsible for the crimes against humanity.   It appears that the one that I am presenting here is indeed in that category!

Many of my readers are now fully aware of the name: Dr. Alan Sabrosky, of the US Army War College, and his expose last year in March about how Israel did the attacks on 9-11.  Now he has done us a great service again by this newest article from Veterans Today, at http://www.veteranstoday.com, entitled: “Israel’s Hidden Faces: A Long Day’s Night For Us All”, which I am proud to present right here for my own readers to view:

Israel’s Hidden Faces : A Long Day’s Night for Us All

March 3, 2011 posted by Dr. Alan Sabrosky

Why Do Most Americans Know Nothing About These Issues

— Dr Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D, University of Michigan) is a ten-year US Marine Corps veteran and a 1986 graduate of the US Army War College.
This is not intended for those who follow these issues, but as a primer  for a general public (especially Americans) who do not follow them, and in fact are not even aware that they are issues!  Hoping that others may also find useful material in it.
Far too often, issues involving Israel and its actions are addressed in a sophisticated and complex manner, often with little or no linkage among them. This is fine for professionals who are well versed in the subject matter, and can infer detail and linkages where none is explicitly given or made.
But it is NOT so for a general public, most of whom are not even aware that these issues exist, and have been exposed to a steady diet of pro-Israel propaganda throughout most if not all of their lives.
This can be used in many ways, but I would focus on state and local officials, newspapers and radio and TV stations, and veterans groups. The classic “grass roots” approach is the only way to circumvent the virtual lock the Zionists have at the national level in the political realm and the media. So let us begin.

Towards a Changing View

I began as a supporter of Israel. I knew nothing of ‘the Nakba’ (Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in 1948) and wouldn’t have cared much if I had heard of it. In the years of death, ethnic cleansing and resettlement of peoples during and after WWII, it just didn’t matter. And with the USSR supporting most of the Arab countries, US support of Israel (like Iran under the Shah) made sense. It was only in the aftermath of the Six Days War (1967) that things changed.

Israeli Attack on the USS Liberty

On June 8, 1967, early in the Six-Day Middle East War, Israeli aircraft and motor torpedo boats attacked the USS Liberty, a US Navy intelligence ship off the coast. Over 200 sailors and Marines were killed or wounded. Israel declared it had mistaken the ship for an Egyptian horse transport, and the US Government accepted that explanation. So did I, until 8 years later. Then I learned. Separate attempts by the two carriers with the US 6th Fleet to launch aircraft to come to the rescue of the USS Liberty were recalled: The first by Defense Secretary Robert McNamara; the second personally by then-President Lyndon Johnson. Either rescue effort would have prevented most of the US casualties.

It is interesting to know that even then, the US Commander-in-Chief valued Israel more than the lives of Americans in uniform. And isn’t it a pity that nothing has changed?

But the Killer is 9/11, orchestrated by Israel

We have all heard of 19 named Arabs in 4 planes, bringing down the two tallest buildings at the World Trade Center, striking the Pentagon, and putting one plane into a Pennsylvania field.
We have not heard the rest of the story.
It begins with WTC7,and creates an evidentiary trail leading directly to Israel and its cohorts in the US.

WTC7  – so much more than the proverbial  “smoking gun”

The 47-story WTC7 collapsed straight down into its own footprint the  evening of 9/11, even though it was not hit by a  plane. This map depicts  the layout of the World Trade Center, and the path of debris from the  impacting  aircraft.
Note that smaller buildings  closer to the Twin Towers did not collapse in that manner, even though at  least one was hit by debris from  a plane and others by debris from  WTC1 & WTC2.
A striking video involves  an interview on Dutch TV with a Dutch  demolitions expert named Danny Jowenko.

It  should be seen in its entirety:

Some key images follow:

The Implications of WTC7

  • First, the controlled demolition of WTC7 means if one building at the WTC was wired for a controlled demolition, then all three were.
  • Second, the impacting civilian airliners were intended to provide a gruesome and shocking distraction that would facilitate the actual destruction of the buildings by other means.
  • Third, any successful operation of this type requires expertise, access to the target(s), and effective local support to facilitate post-attack escape & evasion.
  • Fourth, neither the 19 named Arabs nor any of their possible supporters in the US or elsewhere had the expertise, access and local support needed to do that.
  • Fifth, only Israel had the required expertise, access and local support – inside and outside of the US Government – and a positive incentive to bring down those buildings, which was to enrage the American public and bring the US into war against Israel’s enemies.

So much links Israel to 9/11 – Only a public confession is missing, e.g.

  • Many key Bush Administration officials came from PNAC (Project for a New American Century). All were Zionists (Israeli partisans). They wrote about the need for a “catalytic event” to mobilize the American people.
  • Eight months after coming into office, they got their catalytic event on 9/11, followed by the wars their agenda required.
  • The company providing 24/7 electronic & personal security to the WTC, Kroll Associates, was owned & operated by Zionists, as was the WTC itself as of July 2001.
  • The owners and their immediate relatives seem to have been uncharacteristically absent on the morning of 9/11. Hundreds of American Jews died at the WTC & the Pentagon, but as best as can be determined, only 3 Israelis out of some 4,000 normally there, plus 2 more on the planes.
  • The senior fatality among WTC personnel was a retired Irish-American FBI agent in his first days on his job as Director of Security.
  • A private Israeli-owned security company called ICTS, registered in the Netherlands, provided security services (sometimes through a wholly owned subsidiary) to all three airports from which the four hijacked planes departed.
  • ICTS also provided security at the airports in Paris & Amsterdam, from which the so-called “shoe” & “underwear” bombers respectively departed.
  • Bergen, NJ residents saw five people on a white van filming the attacks and visibly celebrating. They had set up their cameras before the first plane hit. Police arrested them. All were Israelis. Bomb-sniffing dogs reacted as if they had detected explosives, although officers were unable to find anything. The FBI seized the van for further testing.
  • All 5 were later released at the instigation of Israeli & American Jewish leaders, some in the US Government. Details are still classified.

A second van was stopped on the approaches to the George Washington Bridge. As CBS’s Dan Rather said in his live report:

“Two suspects are in FBI custody after a truckload of explosives were discovered around the George Washington Bridge. That bridge links New York to New Jersey over the Hudson River. Whether the discovery of those explosives had anything to do with other events today is unclear, but the FBI, has two suspects in hand, said the truckload of explosives, enough explosives were in the truck to do great damage to the George Washington Bridge…“

Those suspects and the incident then seem to have disappeared from the record.

  • NORAD (North American Air Defense command) and its fighters were conspicuously tardy. They should have intercepted the 4 aircraft within minutes but did not do so, due to a linked series of failures to (1) get timely FAA reports of the deviating aircraft, (2) scramble fighters from the closest bases, (3) intercept at maximum speed, and (4) redeploy already airborne fighters to do the intercepts.
  • Several PNAC alums and their counterparts were in positions to affect that outcome.

And as for the 9/11 Commission…

  • A fatally flawed commission, not least because of its pro-Israel staffing.
  • Many implausible details were accepted or allowed to stand without comment, such as the delivery by a well-dressed man of an intact passport to a detective at the base of the Twin Towers – a passport used to identify one of the named hijackers, that somehow survived the plane’s impact, the ensuing explosion and fire, and an 800-foot fall unaffected by wind.
  • The 9/11 Commission’s Executive Director Philip D. Zelikow evidently ensured that nothing deflecting attention from the 19 named Arabs, or toward Israel, would make the final report, whose reading defies belief.
  • He also told an audience at the University of Virginia on September 10, 2002 that the real reason for his urging war with Iraq regardless of 9/11 was “the threat against Israel.” His concerns and loyalties are at least consistent.

So just what is the US supporting?

  • History, policy, and governmental actions tell only part of the story, of course.
  • The attitudes and values prevalent in Israel are also important, and almost unknown in the US.
  • Here are some of both that speak volumes.

Attack on Gaza: Israel’s Way of War

  • The Israeli assault on Gaza in December 2008 – January 2009 is a classic case in ruthlessness applied to a densely populated urban area. In the operation, some 1,400 Palestinians were killed – nearly a third of whom were women and children who had no conceivable military role – and approximately 5,400 more were wounded.

Israel denied any excesses or
significant casualties among
noncombatants. The evidence says
otherwise.
Differing estimates are presented here from:
(1) B’Tselem, an Israeli Human Rights organization;
(2) its Palestinian counterpart; and (3) the official
Israeli military estimate.
You will note that the Palestinian organization
has a lower figure of combatants killed than the other two, but is still very close to that of B’Tselem. Both consider police officers to be different from combatants, while the Israeli military makes no such distinction.
Also the two Human Rights groups have nearly identical counts of women and children killed, while the Israeli military minimizes those losses, perhaps considering families of dead police officers to be militants, too.

The first Israeli attacks

Israel opened its attack on Gaza with simultaneous strikes on numerous Palestinian police stations, including the graduating class of a Palestinian police academy.
Nearly a third of the so-called “militants” killed were police officers and young cadets.
I was reminded of my own graduation from Marine boot camp, standing there in my new uniform with my family and friends across the parade ground.
It was a time of celebration.
But in Gaza, the Israeli strike force – mostly American-made, with American munitions – came, and left this carnage.
Had I survived something like this at my Marine Corps graduation, I would want the perpetrators (to quote Rahm Emanuel) dead, dead, dead…

Then there were the “militants” who disguised themselves as children….

The name of the dead child on the right above is, or was, Kaukab al Dayah.  It has been reported that she was four years old.   She died on Jan 16, 2009 during Israel’s Operation Cast Lead assault on Gaza....compounded by the widespread use by Israel of white phosphorus and cluster bombs (both provided by the US) in a densely populated urban area, the former a war crime – and therefore its Israeli perpetrators war criminals. The image on the left below is a UN school under attack; the other is a woman whose husband and baby daughter were killed by the white phosphorus shells that burned her. A Jerusalem Tribunal seems to be in order…

And we wonder why they, and so many others, hate the US


Every international tribunal and agency that investigates Israel and Palestine, including one headed by a Jewish judge from South Africa, has strongly condemned Israel for this onslaught, among many others.
Joining the condemnation are many traditional US allies. This, too, few Americans understand.
But the US Government continues to exercise its veto in the UN Security Council to protect Israel from any international sanctions.
On February 18, 2011, the US used its veto against all 14 other members.
This happens often.
In recent years, the US has used its veto power more than the other 4 permanent members combined – almost always on behalf of Israel.

An article of faith

A key issue is the extent to which an orthodox or ultra-orthodox version of Judaism permeates an otherwise largely secular Israeli society.
The former Israel Defense Forces’ chief rabbi, Brig. Gen. Avichai Rontzki, told students in a pre-army yeshiva program in 2009 that soldiers who “show mercy” toward the enemy in wartime will be “damned”.
His views were controversial, but he was NOT repudiated by the Israeli government, and he completed his full 4-year term.
His replacement is somewhat less extreme, but Rontzki’s views are still popular in Israel, especially with Jewish settlers and the ultra-orthodox.

So this is faith? (An Israeli girl inscribes her own message of hate)

One of the most extreme examples to emerge is a controversial book called The King’s Torah, written by two settler rabbis. One chilling edict is that:
The prohibition ‘Thou Shalt Not Murder’ applies only “to a Jew who kills a Jew,” write Rabbis Yitzhak Shapira and Yosef Elitzur of the West Bank settlement of Yitzhar.
Non-Jews are “uncompassionate by nature” and attacks on them “curb their evil inclination,” while babies and children of Israel’s enemies may be killed since “it is clear that they will grow to harm us.”
Many in Israel condemned it.
Many also supported it.
Most Americans heard nothing about it.
Guess why…

Then there is the Wall…

One of the great ironies is that two decades after the Berlin Wall fell, Israel has been constructing an “Apartheid Wall” around and within occupied Palestine, to protect Jewish settlers and contain Palestinian resistance.
It has been noted that The most obvious historical parallel to the barrier is the Berlin Wall, which was 96 miles long…. Israel’s barrier, still under construction, is expected to reach at least 403 miles in length…
The average height of the Berlin Wall was 11.8 feet….compared with the maximum current height of Israel’s Wall — 25 feet… four times as long and in places twice as high as the Berlin Wall.
For the US, what was bad in Europe is fine in Palestine, if Israel wants it.

…And the Jewish Settlers

There are perhaps a half-million Jewish settlers, many from the US & Russia, in Palestine.
Not all are religious fanatics, racist or violent.
But the most extreme ultra-orthodox beliefs, blatant racism and an affinity for violence have fertile ground in the settlements, all of them on Palestinian lands illegally, except, of course, to Israel and the US Government.
Their influence in Israel is significant and rising, the tip of an Israeli society that is far more racist, militarist and intolerant than South Africa during apartheid – a point many black South Africans have made repeatedly, but which somehow is never considered “newsworthy” by the mainstream media (MSM) in the US.

And as if that were not enough,
here is the Israel we support and enable

Israeli expansion of settlements continues in East Jerusalem and the West Bank.
Their usual practice is for armed police to enter a Palestinian area at night and evict the residents, then bring in Jewish settlers and protect them.
This is what happened to the woman in the picture and her family, losing a home of nearly a half-century.
She and friends returned the next day to try to salvage something from the ruin of their life. This is what she met; the picture was taken by a friend.
Lovely, right? This is what the US protects with its pledges of eternal support for Israel…
The face of an Israel it dares not let Americans see.

So why do most Americans know nothing about these things?

  • Accurate portrayals and graphics that leave no doubt about what Israel has done, to the US and to others, are rarely seen in the US.
  • The US Government generally, like the 9/11 Commission itself, studiously avoided any evidence pointing to Israeli involvement.
  • Few in Washington, D.C.– any branch, either party or independents, elected or appointed — dare stand up & criticize Israel for anything.

And just WHO is in charge here?

Few Americans therefore even suspect what much of the world knows: Israel, through the ownership of the mainstream media (MSM) and the leverage exercised by a hydra-headed pro-Israel lobby, effectively controls the US Government, especially the Congress.
This is particularly true of candidates for the Presidency.
No one today can be a serious contender for President from either major party without what have become obligatory pledges of fealty to Israel and laudatory appearances before major Jewish audiences.
But I remember when that was not so, and when our President was expected to serve US & not Israeli interests…

The same holds for the Administration, no matter which party is in power

Almost all of the key US officials dealing with the Middle East were and are Jewish, many with dual citizenship. (The “neo-conservatives” began as Jewish Democrats dissatisfied with President Carter, but now include some who are not Jewish.) Those who are not are strongly pro-Israel, a virtual condition of their appointment, confirmation and support by a Congress whose members compete for Israeli approval – or keep silent Ha’aretz, an Israeli newspaper, remarked in late 2009 that “Every appointee to the American government must endure a thorough background check by the American Jewish community.“No surprise to Israelis, nor to anyone in the US policy community, but a great surprise to most Americans – if they ever heard or read about it.

  • Anyone in the US pointing this out, or even criticizing Israel in any way, is immediately assailed as an anti-Semite or (if Jewish) a self-hating Jew, no matter how ridiculous the charges might be in reality.
  • This is not surprising. Israel’s politicians and supporters have no choice. Like lawyers who find themselves defending a hopelessly guilty client with both law and evidence against them, they pound the table and hurl vile accusations, hoping to quiet the accusers.
  • But it is important to understand that the current concept of anti-Semitism has nothing to do with bigotry towards Jews or Judaism.
  • Indeed, the entire debate over Israel is not one of “Jew versus anti-Semite” as Israel’s supporters would have everyone else believe. It is one of Zionists (supporters of Israel, not all of them Jewish) versus Israel’s critics, a growing number of whom are themselves Jewish, including some Israelis.
  • What “anti-Semitism” means now is any criticism of Israel, or its foreign or domestic policies and actions, or its treatment of Palestinians, or of any individual in the US or elsewhere who supports Israel.
  • The “new” charge of anti-Semitism is therefore intended to shield Israel in the face of activities that, to Israel & its supporters, are “existential threats” to “delegitimize” it, and not an elementary quest for justice and peace, which to most Israelis means only their hegemony.

Media conglomerates owned or led by Zionists in 2011 control:

  • All of the major networks (ABC, CBS, CNN, FOX, NBC).
  • All of the major national newspapers (New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, USA Today).
  • All three weekly news magazines (Time, Newsweek, US News & World Report).
  • All major political journals (Nation, National Review, New Republic, Weekly Standard).
  • Most of the major film studios in Hollywood and New York City.
  • Most of the major publishing houses.
  • Many ISPs (internet service providers)

..So what is this about the control of the US mainstream media (MSM)?

  • Media conglomerates owned or led by Zionists in 2011 control:
  • All of the major networks (ABC, CBS, CNN, FOX, NBC).
  • All of the major national newspapers (New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, USA Today).
  • All three weekly news magazines (Time, Newsweek, US News & World Report).
  • All major political journals (Nation, National Review, New Republic, Weekly Standard).
  • Most of the major film studios in Hollywood and New York City.
  • Most of the major publishing houses.
  • Many ISPs (internet service providers).Raising the subject of Zionist (pro-Israel, most but not all Jewish) control of the media truly excites Israel’s supporters, not because it is anti-Semitic but because it is (at least to them) an unspeakable truth.

Information is power, and the overwhelmingly Zionist-owned MSM makes sure that Americans see, hear and read what Israel wants them to do.
This, plus the enormous financial leverage provided by a brigade of Jewish political action committees (PACs) in the US, gives them effective control of both public opinion and the US Government. The Congress has for decades accurately been depicted as “Israeli occupied territory.”

And this is what it looked like in 2001-2002…
Zionist control has visibly increased today

CEOs and Directors of companies can change as often as Boards of Directors vote.
But if we could “freeze frame” the CEOs of the largest U.S. Media companies in mid 2002, covering the aftermath of 9/11, the attack on Afghanistan and the lead-in to the war in Iraq, we would find that ten outspoken Zionists ran the vast majority of U.S. television networks and other media companies including movies, radio, and publishing at that time.
Note that all except Rupert Murdoch are Americans and Jewish; Murdoch is an Australian, apparently with one Jewish grandparent, but a fervent & influential Zionist nonetheless.

  • The silence of the media on WTC7 and so many of the anomalies associated with 9/11 is deafening. The natural tendency of the media is to investigate any alleged governmental misdeeds with relish, seeing therein prestige and profits.
  • That the media did NOT do that with 9/11, and has generally either ignored or disparaged other efforts to do so, is because its ownership and management knew, suspected or feared that any evidentiary trail would lead directly or indirectly to Israel and its US support base.

And lobbies, lobbies everywhere…

  • Israel has so many PACs and supporting groups that it has a “Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations” to coordinate the activities of its current list of 51 members.
  • AIPAC (the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee) which focuses on the US Government (especially the Congress), is just one of those 51 members, although arguably the most potent because of its focus on Washington.
  • The Israeli Government sponsored ICIC Hasbara (public diplomacy) offers a wide range of services.
  • The Hasbara Fellowships program extends this to campuses.
  • “StandWithUs” continues this, with a strong pro-settler spin.
  • The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) assails any effort to hold Israel accountable for its actions, seeing “anti-Semites” (their own witches, perhaps?) everywhere.
  • Campus Watch
  • Jihad Watch
  • UN Watch
  • Plus a host of funded “policy” and “research” centers, often at otherwise legitimate Institutes and study centers, in Washington and elsewhere, catering to both liberals and conservatives of any and all political persuasions

Epilogue: Costs & Consequences

The price the US pays…
For the joy and satisfaction of providing unlimited and unquestioning support of Israel, we have had a national tragedy (9/11); have waged two needless wars (Afghanistan & Iraq); and are being goaded into a third equally needless war against Iran (with Syria to follow) by the same people who brought us the others.
As of 2/2011, these wars have cost the US some $1.2 trillion, exclusive of the losses at the WTC and the assistance we have provided Israel. Our casualties to date are approximately 67,000 killed and wounded. Both figures will rise sharply following an attack on Iran.
And there is the erosion of our freedom under the misbegotten “Patriot Act” and its offspring…
And what we have done to others

  • Our price does not include all of the death & suffering & destruction we have caused at Israel’s instigation.
  • We have shattered two countries already, and aside from the internal damage to them, there are literally millions of dead, wounded & dispossessed refugees in Afghanistan & Iraq, more of them in Pakistan, and of course the long-suffering Palestinians.

Where we go…

  • Depends on what kind of a legacy we wish to leave to our grandchildren and to posterity:
  • The US can be a protector, enabler and ally of first and last resort to an Israel few would support if they truly knew what is was and did, spending our lives and treasure in support of its ambitions; or
  • The American people can realize that they have been misled & betrayed from within and without, take back their government, and treat Israel as the rogue it is – a criminal state we have fostered.

CHOOSE CAREFULLY & WELL

About the Writer: Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D., University of Michigan) is a writer and consultant specializing in national and international security affairs. In December 1988, he received the Superior Civilian Service Award after more than five years of service at the U.S. Army War College as Director of Studies, Strategic Studies Institute, and holder of the General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research. He is listed in WHO’S WHO IN THE EAST (23rd ed.). A Marine Corps Vietnam veteran and a 1986 graduate of the U.S. Army War College, Dr. Sabrosky’s teaching and research appointments have included the United States Military Academy, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Middlebury College and Catholic University; while in government service, he held concurrent adjunct professorships at Georgetown University and the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). Dr. Sabrosky has lectured widely on defense and foreign affairs in the United States and abroad. You can email Dr. Alan Sabrosky at: docbrosk@comcast.net

NTS Notes:  I wish to thank Dr. Alan Sabrosky for his efforts in telling the truth to everyone as to exactly WHO is the real danger to humanity!

This is indeed another wakeup call for everyone.   The American support for Israel is destroying America itself!   What will it take for everyone to finally see the truth for themselves?

And for all of those naysayers, hasbara, sayanim, and “Israel firsters” that may scream their phoney “Antisemitism” at myself, and the author Dr Sabrosky… I have news for you… Dr Sabrosky is Jewish.   Obviously, like in the cases of Benjamin Freedman, and Gilad Atzmon, he is on the side of all humanity against real criminality, and is not blinded by false religious or phoney racial dogma!

The truth definitely hurts….

More to come

NTS

*Important supplementary note, March 5th, 2011… It has come to my attention that this article was removed from Veterans Today….Readers, please make copies of this important article as soon as you can, and spread it around to others… It appears that this article is indeed dynamite, and the evil tribe is doing their best to have it removed!….  I will do my best to keep this article up for everyone to see right here!

Jewish leadership changing the rules to demand even greater obeisance

JEWRY’S “LINGUISTIC TERRORISM” AGAINST BECK

By Rev. Ted Pike
1 Feb 11

 

Old English Dictionary

For more than 60 years, Christian and conservative leaders have dutifully accepted Jewish dogma that the Nazis were the historical apex of evil; they accept that the Holocaust exterminated six million Jews and has no parallel in human history. The political right obediently fails to mention that Jewish supremacists inspired and abetted international communism, slaughtering 100 million-plus Christians and Gentiles. (See, Jewish Activists Created Communism) Instead, they parrot that Nazi atrocities are the standard against which all lesser evils are measured. Such cooperation by Christians has been accepted by Jews as their due, as a race which has suffered (primarily at the hands of Christians) more than any other.

 

Today, Jewish leadership is changing the rules to demand even greater obeisance.

In 2009, after Israel’s horrific siege of Gaza, political cartoonists widely depicted Israeli leadership and military as similar to Nazism. Israel’s PR rep, the Anti-Defamation League, struck back against such critics through its Office of Global Anti-Semitism in the US State Department. The State Dept. agreed that any comparison of Israeli brutality to Nazism or the “Holocaust” is now “anti-Semitic”—a virtual hate crime. (See, Jewish Activist Heads State Department’s Office of Global Anti-Semitism)

ADL then began to express even more objections to unauthorized use of Nazi terminology. It is increasingly clear that ADL/world Jewry now claim virtual copyright on such terms. These are words, ADL asserts, which are bound to the unique and sacred suffering of Jews. ADL even teaches it insults the real Holocaust when pro-lifers dare to compare it to the killing of hundreds of millions of unborn babies worldwide. (forward.com “Huckabee’s ‘Holocaust’ Analogy Has ADL Angry” 10.31.07; adl.org “New York State Senator Should Apologize for His Remarks Comparing Abortion to the Holocaust” 3.18.05; adl.org “Letters to the Editor” 3.17.06 )

Rabbis Wants to Hijack Language

Last week, 400 US rabbis, spanning all branches of Judaism from Reconstructionism to Orthodoxy, sent a letter to Fox News demanding that talk show host Glenn Beck be censured. They were irate that he denigrated Holocaust survivor George Soros and has used Jewish-owned terms, such as “Nazi” and “Holocaust,” to attack his enemies. The rabbis assert such terms are so enmeshed in Jewish suffering that, when employed to criticize anything less than the magnitude of the Holocaust, such references become not only insulting to the Jewish people but border on actual anti-Semitism.

What used to be right-wing obedience to Jewish desire to vilify Nazis as much as possible is now used against the right – being irrationally portrayed by Jewish leaders as “disrespect of the Jewish dead,” a sacrilege. For Beck’s insult of using the word “holocaust” inappropriately, and his unfortunate misrepresentation of the youth of Soros, a Holocaust survivor, the rabbis proclaim Beck’s words “monstrous” and “beyond repugnant” in their “anti-Semitic imagery.” (Washington Post.com “Glenn Beck vs. the Rabbis” 1.28.11)

Similar howls and claims of Jewish hurt feelings erupted a week earlier when Sarah Palin described attacks upon her as “blood libel.” Jewish leaders clearly believe “blood libel” is again intellectual Jewish property, a phrase to be used only with Jewish permission and to describe medieval Christian persecution of Jews. To do otherwise, they assert, is perilously close to complicity with those who have actually persecuted Jews throughout history.

Obviously, liberal Jewish leadership is, at the very least, hostile to the religious right. Worse, it is straining to bring about the decline and persecution of those who project Christian values into the political forum. Unable to legitimately accuse loyal Christian followers of Israel, they attempt the next best thing: an illusion that the religious right is abrasive and insensitive to Jewish feelings and past sufferings. Such insensitivity, Jewish supremacists claim, reveals an inclination toward Jew-hatred. Thus, the right is a seedbed for renewed persecution of Jews.

Beck’s lack of initial comment only increases public perception that he can’t answer his Jewish accusers.

These 400 spiritual leaders of American Judaism are indulging in sinister and manipulative rumor-mongering. Beck, Palin and virtually all major leaders of the religious right are utterly obedient to Jewish/Holocaust/anti-Nazi values. Yet, by turning their very anti-Nazi zeal against them, liberal Jewry hopes to create as many evangelical offenders as possible. They want to blacken the right as anti-Semitic and violence-engendering, worthy of legislation drastically curbing its freedoms.

ADL and SPLC hoped last month that some substantial link would tie Jared Loughner to right-wing or, even better, anti-Zionist organizations. They were disappointed. But these Jewish attack groups are confident that eventually a terrorist assassin (or even an “agent provocateur”) will erupt in violence, armed with generous connections to conservatism. When that happens, liberal Jewry and its big media will consider their present irrational efforts to link Beck and Palin with anti-Semitism to have been a sound propaganda offensive, a vital first step toward outright persecution. (See, Jews Confirm Big Media Is Jewish)

What Can We Do?

We must not tolerate Jewish attempts to take possession of important, highly descriptive words of the English language. Words and their definitions have tremendous potency for good or evil, empowering enormous movements of history.

In the 1960s, pornography and buring of the flag were made into “free speech.” Abortionists, unable to rationally promote their case for killing the unborn, marketed their gruesome industry as “a woman’s right to choose.” Soon after, sodomy was called “the gay lifestyle.” Now, ADL’s Department of Global Anti-Semitism in the US State Department defines “anti-Semitism” as the New Testament assertion that Jews had Christ killed. (See, The Real Motive Behind the “Department of Global Anti-Semitism“)

It is vital that lovers of freedom continue using all of the English language freely in political discourse—even in denunciation. If we stop using certain words because Jewish manipulators claim they are “deeply hurt” by such “uncivil” usage, then we empower these supremacists to demand even more censorship.

Eventually, with only “inoffensive” speech allowed and “hate speech” not tolerated, we will discover we no longer have a working, protective First Amendment. We will no longer have a language capable of condemning evil.

We will no longer have freedom.

Source: Email