Yesterday’s Rebel Newsflash triggered an unusually high number of angry responses and requests to be deleted from our mailing list. Normally, I couldn’t care less, but one writer, Jeffrey Blankfort, disappointed me. He’s one of the very few Jews I would be happy to shake hands with, together with the likes of Gilad Atzmon, Henry Makow and Steve Lendman.
Blankfort’s reaction was triggered by the following paragraphs from JB Campbell’s latest article titled “A Dangerous Life”, which were quoted in the Rebel Newsflash.
Life has become dangerous for us all, thanks entirely to the Jews. They’ve put us, the living, into deadly danger. Millions of others haven’t been so lucky, because they’re already dead. Dead at the hands of Jewish Capitalism and Jewish Communism. Dead at the hands of the Bush family war machine. Millions of Bush victims since 1991, not to mention the Wilson, Roosevelt/Truman, Eisenhower, Johnson and Nixon dead. Mass murder always has behind it a Jewish purpose. Mass murder is good for the Jews.
The hopeful changeling now admits there is a star chamber, a death panel, operating in the White House, that decides which Americans can and should be assassinated.
We’re pretty sure that we’re on a list. The Jews have been making their lists and checking them twice. Everyone’s naughty and nobody’s nice. The big wipeout, the population reduction down to 500 million, is the only way that the Jews can think of to remove all opposition. Even if they could realize that impossible dream, they’d keep killing the survivors because that’s all they know to do. They can’t build anything other than A-bombs and plagues. They can’t do a lick of work and they’ll kill you if you do. They are the destroyers.
Here’s Blankfort’s initial outburst:
You are either nuts or on the Zionist payroll. Probably both. I’ve been fighting the Zionists and Jewish power a lot longer than you but as far as I’m concerned you are a fucking Nazi and if it was worth doing so I’d fight you as well. So please take me off your list.
Later, Blankfort elaborated in a second email:
There is ample evidence to demonstrate how organized American Jewry through manipulation and the power of its checkbooks has undermined what remains of US democracy in Israel’s name and has attempted to do the same in other Western countries with varying degrees of success, how key elements in its hierarchy were credited by the Brits in pushing the US into WW1 on England’s side which led to the defeat of Germany and the disastrous Versailles agreement for which the Zionists were paid with the land of Palestine, but the statement that “Mass murder always has behind it a Jewish purpose. Mass murder is good for the Jews” and that “The big wipeout, the population reduction down to 500 million, is the only way that the Jews can think of to remove all opposition. Even if they could realize that impossible dream, they’d keep killing the survivors because that’s all they know to do. They can’t build anything other than A-bombs and plagues. They can’t do a lick of work and they’ll kill you if you do. They are the destroyers.” is nothing but racist garbage of the worst sort and anyone who spouts such nonsense is not worth listening to. Whether you or Campbell wrote those words, is irrelevant. They are repellent.
He didn’t explain why he found these words repellent, or where exactly Campbell was wrong, but he made the point that not all Jews were bad.
As individuals, Jews, most of whom were or are not affiliated or involved with the machinations of the organized community, have contributed, in far too many ways to count, to advancements in science and medicine and culturally that affirm, improve, and preserve life that are the antithesis to killing. To include them, as those cited statements imply, as part of the organized Jewish community which, acting collectively, has brought nothing but harm to whatever and whomever it touches is simply dishonest and the latter has more than enough on its charge sheet without claiming, without any basis, that its goal is mass murder. Yes, I know that the Torah is a record of genocides, real or imagined, that the god the ancient Hebrews created supposedly ordered them to do and that same mentality informs orthodox Judaism in Israel today but that’s not a program that most Jews, even your average Zionists, buy into.
Blankfort’s words are typical for ‘enlightened’ or ‘righteous’ Jews. They can see the flaws of behaviour within their community, but refuse to admit that they are endemic, an essential condition of Jewishness. Instead, they always point out the outstanding contributions in science, medicine and culture supposedly made by Jews.
Yes, Jews have been “successful” in their host countries, but that is mainly due to their blatant cross-promotion, tribal favouritism and parasitism. Anyone who hasn’t worked that out as yet should read Prof. Kevin MacDonald’s “Culture of Critique”.
A good example is the Jewish saint Albert Einstein, who is always quoted as evidence for Jewish alleged superior intelligence. In reality he was the biggest plagiarist and conman Jewish ‘science’ ever produced.
And let’s not get fooled by the high percentage of Jews in academia, a sole result of Jewish favouritism and the fact that universities are ranked by the (Jewish) Education Times, supposedly according to how much of their academic work gets published. Published by whom? Jewish controlled scientific publications.
That’s the whole point of the ‘merit-based’ society model, Jews love so much. Who gets to decide who deserves a particular well-paid and/or powerful position? They of course. The fact that more often than not Jews find other Jews to be the most deserving for a particular job, is just a jewincidence, a coincidence that is “good for the Jews”.
But let’s go back to Blankfort’s argument that Jews have contributed so much to the better of mankind, that it would be unfair to discriminate against them, leave alone expel them as it has been done hundreds of times before.
It you want to consider all the ‘good’ Jews supposedly did, you also need to consider all the ‘evil’ , balance them out against each other and then decide. The more people find out about Jewish ‘contributions’ to their host societies, the more they realise that the negatives by far outweigh the positives.
This leads to the question whether it is right to judge Jews as a group, or whether they need to be assessed on an individual basis. This is the old ethical argument between utilitarianism – which is mainly concerned with the common good – and deontological philosophy, according to which individual rights must not be violated.
Ethical philosophies are of course just frameworks – a way of looking at a particular problem – in order to analyse it and decide on the best solution. When analysing the ‘Jewish Problem’ – same as with any other problem – we need to ask the question which ethical framework is the most appropriate.
As much as I sympathise with the deontological concerns for individual rights, I can see problems with a case by case approach when it comes to Jews. For one, there is the deceptive nature of Jews. You can’t take any of their words and actions at face value, making a case by case evaluation incredibly complicated . And, unfortunately, we are running out of time. The descent into a Jew World Order, or Jewish world domination, is accelerating and we simply cannot afford the luxury of pondering any longer over the question which Jew is a ‘good Jew’ and which one an evil monster.
Satan’s Chosen People
Not Zionism, not Judaism, Jewishness is the real threat
Our Worst Enemy: Our Fear of the Jews
Are The Jews God’s Chosen People?
Good Jew, Bad Jew
The Role of the Jews in the New World Order
No to Anti-Anti-Semitism
The Jewish Problem
The Ethics of Anti-Anti-Semitism
Blaming the Jews
Israel’s right to exist
An Open Word About Anti-Semitism
Anti-Semitism is a good thing
My Jewish Problem
The Evilness of Jewish Chosenness
Jewish consciousness and the river of denial
Terror – The Signature Smell of Zionism
The Jewish Question
For Evil To Prevail
The Bigger Picture