Revised: Is Homeland Security’s new armoured vehicle coming your way?

Revised: 2/21/2014

homeland-security-armored-vehicleI just finished reading a series of articles from Before It’s News and although Jim Stone highly recommends the site for the truth, I now wonder.

This particular article dealt with the coming collapse of the economy and martial law being instituted once the banks failed, within 72 hours.  According to a BIN report from a DHS insider it could happen anytime between March and April this year.  Well, we had the same scare around October last year so I’m not spurred on by this bit of fear mongering.

The article contained several videos since it covered more than just one topic of concern.  The second and third video included a former military intelligence veteran claiming loyalty to Israel, while spewing lies and mistruths about the Palestinians.  That was in the third video while he tells us America is a sitting duck.

Then in the very next breath he informs us that Iran refuses to shut down their centrifuges which enrich uranium for the expressed purpose of making a nuclear bomb.  Well, I decided to research the matter further to see if I could corroborate his story.  Turns out that what this whistleblower said was only partially true.  Iran struck a deal back in November 2013 to ease sanctions with world powers.  Furthermore, this dealt with Iran’s new generation of centrifuges which are presently offline. [source]

In the second video he claimed that hundreds of thousands of veterans were very aware about what is happening in the country and he and others were concerned about nine suspicious planes that flew into American airspace a few weeks ago.  Blocked Heavy Lift Aircraft Inbound to CONUS In Airspace–Suspicious Activity was being monitored by apparent veterans and it was concluded that the planes originated from either China or Russia.  Yet, the destination of the planes were at present unknown.

The last two videos were from a person calling himself Original Pilgrim.  I can tell you he’s either a Jew or Christian Zionist.  When he used the term Jewish Christians I stopped the video.  Of course, he was rambling about Jewish prophecy of the end of America.  America is the Jewish cash-cow so why would they want to end it?

I made a comment on his YouTube video and his response stated that he was a “jewish christian.”  Like I said in the comment there is no such thing and an oxymoron to boot.  Judaism and Christianity are diametrically opposed to one another both in faith and religious philosophy.

If this corrupt government collapses the economy there will be civil war and they can try to instill martial law, but they will have one hell of a fight on their hands.  Does anyone really believe that the sock-puppet coward in the White House is ready for all out war with the people, especially the 40 or 50 million now without jobs, and very little hope of even finding one?  When you’ve lost everything you have nothing else to lose and I believe those Americans would stand and fight.  I’m not so sure that Obama and his lackeys are ready to murder a large majority of their tax-payer commodities.  Without US, the people, to slave away for them they have nothing and they know it.

The point is I wonder why Before It’s News endorsed this article?  There was a modicum of truth in the article, but there was obviously disinformation, as well.  Like I’ve always said, be leery and double-check sources.  Trust no one, but your own common sense, and lastly decide for yourself whether what you’re reading is the real truth.

Whitewraithe~   

Countering Federal Terrorism

WHAT'S WRONG WITH VIOLENCE?

WHAT’S WRONG WITH VIOLENCE?

There are few things more complex and deceptive than psychological operations, whether run by the CIA, the army or the government’s psychiatrists themselves.  The operations are complex due to the complexity of the mind.  The general purpose of psychological operations is to demoralize the enemy so that he gives up without fighting.

In its introduction to PSYOP in the army’s field manual, FM 3-05.30, the army says this:

1-1.            PSYOP are a vital part of the broad range of United States (U.S.) diplomatic, informational, military, and economic (DIME) activities.  The employment of any element of national power, particularly the military element, has always had a psychological dimension.  Foreign perceptions of U.S. military capabilities are fundamental to strategic deterrence.  The effectiveness of deterrence hinges on U.S. ability to influence the perceptions of others.  The purpose of PSYOP is to induce or reinforce foreign attitudes and behavior favorable to U.S. national objectives.  PSYOP are characteristically delivered as information for effect, used during peacetime and conflict, to inform and influence.  When properly employed, PSYOP can save lives of friendly and adversary forces by reducing the adversaries’ will to fight.  By lowering adversary morale and reducing their efficiency, PSYOP can also discourage aggressive actions and create dissidence and disaffection within their ranks, ultimately inducing surrender.  PSYOP provide a commander the means to employ a nonlethal capability across the range of military operations from peace through conflict to war and during postconflict operations.

What is the mission of PSYOP? 

1-5.    The mission of PSYOP is to influence the behavior of foreign target audiences  (TAs) to support U.S. national objectives.  PSYOP accomplish this by conveying selected information and/or advising on actions that influence the emotions, motives, objective reasoning and ultimately the behavior of foreign audiences.  Behavioral change is at the root of the PSYOP mission.  Although concerned with the mental processes of the TA, it is the observable modification of TA behavior that determines the mission success of PSYOP.  It is this link between influence and behavior that distinguishes PSYOP from other capabilities and activities of information operations (IO) and sets it apart as a unique core capability.

We Americans, of course, are also foreign target audiences right along with Iraqis, Afghans, Pakistanis, Yemenis, Libyans, Syrians and Iranians.  And we are targeted by the scaremonger profiteers of the truth movement who appear to be following the army’s psycho-program.  They “deliver information for effect,” the technique of PSYOP.  The intended effect is demoralization.  The reader should have a look at the field manual for him/herself and while doing so disregard the world “foreign.”  We Americans, right along with foreigners, are under attack by the military/intelligence complex.   It is indeed a sophisticated war by information, or “info-war.”

There was a time when dire warnings were relevant, a time when people just didn’t know what was going on, and it was legitimate to try to scare them awake and into action with facts.  That time went right up through the Reagan period when most Americans figured we had a benevolent old geezer in charge of things.  That dreamy idea should have crashed with the rise of Bush, which it apparently did for around five million guys who supported the “militia” movement during that period, but not for the hundreds of millions of average Americans.  That was twenty years ago and today even the dimmest bulb knows something wicked this way comes.  That’s not the question anymore.  The question is, what are we going to do about it, not how much more can we be scared?

Psychologically, people can take just so much scaring until they become totally demoralized into paralysis.   That must have been what happened in Russia and China, when the Reds took over.   Thousands of prisoners obeying a few jerks with guns.

We know enough.  We realize some people need a daily or hourly fix of bad news, like some people are hooked on roller coasters.  Some people are hooked on bull riding, mountain climbing and motor racing – things that can really get you killed.  Maybe they’re adrenaline junkies – who knows?  I’m a fine one to talk but today I only risk my life for a political reason.

In this time of the known intent of the federal government, which has authorized itself to arrest us without charge, hold us indefinitely, disappear, torture and kill us – all according to laws such as the PATRIOT Act and NDAA – in times such as these we don’t require any more scare stories that do not have recommendations attached to them.  Such scare stories should be shunned if they don’t include proposed solutions because they only serve the federal PSYOP program of demoralization.

We don’t need any more “news.”  We don’t need any more analysis.  We are in information overload and, like the NSA itself, we are all clogged up with both metadata and content.

Fact is, the American Defense Party is the only outfit in the country and maybe in the world that always, as a policy, includes a fix with every essay about the tyrannical federal government and the invisible government that actually runs it.  We propose solutions for the problems we discuss, whether they are political, medical or to do with self-defense against enforcers.  We are all about shutting down the tyranny, not in being taken to camps.  Bloggers who talk about camps without talking about shooting enforcers are working for the enforcers, maybe unknowingly – maybe not.

Who are the big offenders?  Well, who makes the most money in the “alternative media?”  As every news outlet that receives advertising money – from NBC to Business Insider – knows, the advertisers determine what is and is not newsworthy.  If you don’t report the news to their liking, advertisers pull their accounts and the news business goes out of business.  CNN’s prostitution to the CIA-run corporations is such a dirty joke that the network has announced plans to produce entertainment programs, since few people watch it for news.  Real news can only be found on the net.

Manipulation through advertising has been the ADL’s method of news control for decades.  If you’re big enough and important enough, as is the Alex Jones news empire, you’re even provided lawyers, business agents and tax preparers to protect your operation from laws meant for the rest of us.  To get that big requires a sophisticated understanding of fear and misdirection.

Alex Jones is the biggest private scaremonger in the world.  He scares the bejeezus out of his followers.  The names of his outlets are psyop names:  Infowars and Prison Planet.  The former is right out of the army’s field manual and the latter implants in the follower the idea that the planet is a prison.  Jones constantly tells his followers that they are essentially doomed to be prisoners on a prison planet.  He not only does not give followers the Jewish identity of the criminal syndicate behind this imprisonment but he also does not offer one suggestion of how to defeat the syndicate, other than to keep supporting his media empire and buying stuff from his advertisers.

Every official act of aggression today is a psychological operation, or a psychological experiment.  The government needs to know how we will react to its provocations, whether committed by IRS, cops, teachers, FBI or the reports that we are under total surveillance by NSA.  They need to know how much we’ll take before saying, No More, before joining something like the American Defense Party to overthrow the government.

Because there’s nothing left to do but overthrow it.  We can’t tame it, we can’t reform it, we can’t make it our friend or serve us in any way.  We shouldn’t even think about such things.  Anything that threatens us must be destroyed, not housebroken.

So, how do we overthrow the government?  For openers, by total non-compliance with every federal law, order, plan, program and act of aggression.  Everything the federal government does is an act of aggression against us.  That’s a passive way to do it – just non-compliance.  Everyone should practice non-compliance.

The most significant way is to stop filing IRS forms and paying them any money.  It doesn’t matter if you think there is or isn’t a law that says you have to file and pay.  There is no written law that says so.  But there’s the law of the gun, which says you do have to file and pay.  The law of the gun only works on people who don’t have any guns or the guts to use them if they do.

Obviously don’t vote for anything in the federal government.  When you vote you are giving your approval of the system.  You’re authorizing the use of force against people such as yourself, which if you did it you’d wind up in prison.  The American Defense Party stands for ending the federal super-government.   The state governments will have to be brought under control as well, but the primary threat to our lives right now is Frankenstein’s federal monster and Dr. Frankenstein himself – the Federal Reserve.  The law is such that only directed violence can bring down this deadly duo.

So, the question is, what’s wrong with violence? 

Everything’s wrong with it if you use it first.  That’s called “unprovoked violence” and is practiced mainly by the US government, here and abroad.  The first guy to get violent deserves everything he gets.  Anyone in the government who uses violence or even the threat of violence is our most dangerous and treacherous enemy and must be killed.

Intelligence – surveillance and spying – is the intent to commit violence after first determining what’s on our minds.  The enemy wants to know what we’re going to do in response to his aggression – his unprovoked violence.  The NSA is military intelligence.  Why does military intelligence want to know everything about us?  Only one reason:  the government intends to attack us at some point in the future, which could be next week or next year.  It’s already been attacking us for decades with an array of deadly stealth weapons such as vaccines, weather war, cyber war, the BP blowouts, chemtrails, and radiation poisoning.  It’s been sending our young people into deadly undeclared wars such as Iraq, which alone has produced a million casualties in eleven years, not to mention the big wars of the 20th Century.

The federal government thinks violence is fine.  It just wants a total monopoly on its use.  The federal government is a big version of the Israeli government.  It is easily offended when anyone or any weaker country objects to the official use of violence.  But now it’s time to do a lot more than object.

Cops, too, think violence is fine as long as they’re doing it.  As this writer has said many times, cops are licensed to use violence and to kill us.  When’s the last time a cop was punished for killing the wrong person?

So the experts agree:  nothing wrong with violence.  The American Defense Party, however, says there’s everything wrong with government violence and the only way to deal with it is counter-violence by its victims, preferably its intended victims, preferably before the evil act occurs and more good people get killed or wounded.  It’s called self-defense.

I was on a jury one time.  A couple of hapless guys were facing prison for assault with a deadly weapon.  Turned out one of them was attacked by a gang, was on his knees having the tar beaten out of him when his buddy, a telephone linesman, saw it.   He ran to his company truck and grabbed a mattock and started toward the whole gang, swinging the instrument.  Naturally the cops rolled up in time to see this rescue and arrested him and his bleeding friend.  The jury got the case and we retired to the jury room.  The bailiff came in with the mattock and put it on the long table.  In the first vote a few jurors voted guilty.  I asked, “Who voted guilty?”  An Asian lady said, “I did.”  “Why?”  She looked at the mattock and said, “Well, there’s the weapon.”  I asked her, “Do you know the difference between assault and self-defense?”  She didn’t.  Don’t worry – we turned them loose, finding them not guilty of any charge that the prosecution offered in a smorgasbord of possibilities.  The few fools on the jury just had to have some things explained to them.  But you can see how dangerous it is to go to trial with a jury.  Almost as dangerous as a trial by a judge.  We can no longer subject our freedom and lives to a bogus, treacherous legal system.  Our prisons are full of two and a half-million convicts who mostly victimized no one and were represented by fake lawyers paid by the government, fake lawyers who only do one thing for their clients:  plea-bargain and plead guilty.

But that’s the question being asked of us by our treacherous government thugs:  do we understand the difference between assault and self-defense?  They don’t ask us exactly that way.  What they actually do is attempt to dominate us with a combination of surveillance and violence.  Surveillance is the overture to violence.  That’s the purpose of surveillance, to calculate the most efficient use of violence at some future time.  Where will the subject be, what will he be doing, what will be his response to violence?  It’s the same in war and in police terror.

There is a cowardly thing happening now:  the revelations of Ed Snowden are suspected to be CIA disinformation, or PSYOP.  The one million seven hundred thousand top secret documents he released are actually intended to demoralize us into giving up.  The truth is that the cowards giving this excuse have already given up and will use this excuse to justify their unwillingness to fight the tyrants.  The truth is that Snowden has shattered the lies of the surveillance industry forever.  The tyrants who have winked and chuckled and lied when asked how much they know about us will never recover from this PR nightmare.  Their industry will expand but it will grow more hated and scorned every week as more Snowden documents are revealed by Greenwald and others.

The position of the American Defense Party is that all federal activity is treason against the people and must be shut down.  The federal surveillance industry is a very good reason why this must happen, among many others.  Uppermost is the federal war industry, of which surveillance is a part.  Snowden showed that totalitarian surveillance has been conducted against us since around 1950, once the vile National Security Act began exercising power over our lives – in total secrecy.

Americans could never afford “national security,” either financially or morally, but we had no idea what was going on.  We didn’t know we couldn’t afford it because we didn’t know what it was or what it cost us in terms of money and danger and immorality.  We were lied to for decades by the secret gangsters.  But now we know.  Not everything yet, but we know enough.  Surveillance has been waged against us because we Americans were always the ultimate targets of the sadistic and predatory federal government.  The US fedgov devoted much violence and our treasure to wipe out foreign “enemies” for the entire 20th Century.  It’s still doing it but Ed Snowden showed us last summer that we Americans are the ultimate targets of fedgov.  The only missing ingredient is the answer to the implied question:  What do we plan to do about it?

The burden placed upon us by our new knowledge is that in failing to act violently against our own tyrants – since a civilized, legal response is barred from our use – we become progressively more immoral and cowardly every day.  A legal response is not possible because the federal tyranny decides for us what is legal and available to us.  The federal legal system has decided that we have no standing in federal courts to complain about anything, that only a Jewish legal team, the ACLU, can do this.  As JFK said, those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable.  That’s where we are now.  Violent revolution is inevitable and always was due to the structure of the Constitution, which presented us with a presidency that would inevitably become a tyranny, which finally happened in 1861.  It happened again in 1913 and yet again in 1933.  Tyranny became the American way of life after Roosevelt and then Truman, who gave us the National Security Act.

Again, what’s wrong with violence?  In aggression – everything.  In self-defense – nothing.

At what point shall we resort to violence?  Well, immediately, the instant a cop or fed tries to attack us.   Recall the recent cases of Brandon Raub, Blaine Cooper and Ibragim Todashev.  Raub was taken away by FBI and cops for wondering about 911 on Facebook.  He was turned over to VA shrinks for a chemical lobotomy.  Cooper was ordered by cops to submit to an FBI interrogation because of what he’d said on Facebook and found they had his entire Facebook history in a file, and similar files on his wife and parents.  Todashev submitted to FBI interrogation and was shot seven times.  The lesson for us here is that the FBI must be considered dangerous terrorists, which is exactly what they are.  There’s no point in speaking to them because the minute you say something, they can accuse you of lying to them, which is a federal felony.  If they don’t like what you say, they may well shoot you in the head.  And never forget WTC ’93, in which several floors of Tower 2 were destroyed by an FBI bomb.

Violence is the only way to deal with intimidation and threats of violence and violence itself.  Remember also that Brandon Raub’s attorney, John Whitehead, learned from veterans and a Virginia reporter while trying to spring his client that an average of 20,000 people a year (mostly veterans), just in Virginia, are picked up and put in psychiatric wards.  Some get released after “treatment,” some disappear.  Treatment apparently consists of chemical lobotomies, based on Raub’s shrink telling him, “I’m going to have to brainwash you.  I’m going to medicate you forcibly.”  This was shortly before Whitehead’s court-ordered release showed up.

Readers familiar with the ExtremismOnline website know how significant the Brandon Raub case was and is.  The case and the huge numbers of “civil commitments” just in Virginia each year have put us in the position that we now have no choice but to start shooting if a number of cops and FBIs appear at our doors because there won’t be a happy ending if we surrender.

Veterans are now considered by their treacherous government to be psychologically damaged and as such prohibited from owning guns.  I guess if I were lied into going to a strange country to kill and be killed and was then slandered and vilified by my former employer and blamed for doing what I was trained and ordered to do, I’d be psychologically damaged myself.  We’ve all got a case of PTSD – not to mention the ass – from the betrayal by our treacherous and parasitical employees in the federal government and the federalized thugs wearing police uniforms, carrying guns and driving cars that we paid for.

The government is at war with all of us, not just the vets.  So we’ve all got to stick together and fight.  The best way to do this is to align ourselves with the American Defense Party.  We must punish all who abuse power.  When a person is a member of the party, he or she enters into a mutual defense pact with other members and agrees to come to the aid of another member who is threatened by the feds or federalized police.  That’s the price of membership and it’s mandatory.  Everything else about the party is voluntary, but so is joining up in the first place.  There is no political or financial advantage in membership – just the mutual defense pact with others.  But that will be worth a lot.

As the party grows it will be understood by feds and cops that they should not try anything with members because it will lead to them getting in a dreaded crossfire if they hang around for a few minutes.   Then there is the matter of reprisals in the event the member cannot be assisted in a timely fashion.  Reprisals will become standard operating procedure for federal aggression, whether or not backup is provided in time.  And reprisals can be carried out anywhere in America in the member’s name.

This is how terrorism is dealt with.  It’s called counter-terror and I predict it is the next big thing.

Source: JBCampbellExtremismonline.com

Fukushima Sabotage!

Fukushima and the Japan earthquake, LOUD AND CLEAR

3/11 was Japan’s 911. The Japan earthquake was man made and had a peak seismic intensity of 6.67 Richter and happened 100 km inland at seismic station MYGOO4. The tsunami was caused by nuclear weapons, a total of six of them, set off in sequence in the Japan trench to trigger an enormous tsunami.

The fact that there was no major earthquake in Japan is easily proven – just look at all the youtube videos of the approaching tsunami and look for earthquake damage. There is NONE, NADA, ZERO before the tsunami hit and even the Sendai damage report showed that there were absolutely NO collapsed structures and zero leaning structures. Sendai, a city of over a million people, was less than 30 miles from the reported epicenter and suffered no significant damage of any sort at all.

A 9.0 is such a huge quake that China, Korea, and Russia should have seen significant earthquake damage from one happening in Japan and everything in Sendai should have been leveled. Yet no nation outside of Japan could even feel it. To shake Tokyo, a second fake earthquake was triggered near seismic station IBR003. All of this is in the official Japanese seismic record.

Fukushima was destroyed by the Stuxnet virus and nuclear weapons, while it’s staff was confused by the mayhem caused by the tsunami

Contrary to what many out there are saying, Fukushima Diiachi was an extremely well run nuclear facility with everything in top notch condition. This facility contracted with Israeli security firm Magna BSP to provide security for the entire facility. Magna BSP was in fact operating as a front company for the Israeli defense forces.

Magna BSP managed to plant the Stuxnet virus in the controllers for reactors 1-3. They also managed to install a totally unauthorized data connection to the inner containment at reactor 3, where they installed a nuclear weapon under reactor 3 that was thinly disguised as a security camera. They had already installed similar looking cameras that were real cameras around the perimeter of the Fukushima Diiachi grounds. These outdoor cameras were functioning stereoscopic units that could see for miles, and were remarkable in their performance. But they were the precursor for a deception – a fake nuke camera that was placed deep underground, in the area which contained the suppression tank directly under reactor 3. The functioning version of this camera is pictured on the left.

The EXACT nuke camera that was used to destroy reactor 3 is pictured below, along with diagrams for gun type nuclear weapons. Michu Kaku was right in saying nuclear weapons destroyed Fukushima, but he got the precedent wrong. It was not a joint defense pact, it was Magna BSP and the IDF acting alone. And I got my hands on a photograph of the EXACT WEAPON USED.  It is pictured below, under the heading Magna BSP’s “owl”.

The generators never swamped, and external power to Fukushima was never lost

After doing the final assessment after the disaster, it was proven that outside power to Fukushima was never lost, and that the diesel generators would therefore have never been needed. But the power switched off, all by itself, and no one can figure out why. Except those aware of the Stuxnet virus. For a detailed report on the Stuxnet virus, go to the Fukushima report and scroll down the page until you get to the portion of that report that describes in detail exactly what happened during the virus attack.

In addition to this, of the 17 diesel generators out at Fukushima, 4 got significant water, and the rest never flooded at all. Yet 12 of the 13 generators that never got an ounce of water switched off all by themselves, and the one that remained running was the only one not connected to a Siemens Scada controller, which the Stuxnet virus infects. One generator remained running throughout the entire disaster, the only one not controlled by a Siemens Scada controller, but the IDF had a handle on that one because the electrical transfer switch that managed it’s output between it and reactors 1-4 was controlled by a virus infected controller, which prevented this switch from activating. This generator however had no siemens scada controlled switch between it and reactors 5 and 6, which had no problems because this last lone generator kept their pumps running.

Additionally, after having all generators “fail”, Tepco had flat bed semi truck mounted generators brought in, generators that would have easily prevented any problems and they were there in less than 8 hours, all hooked up and ready to go, but the same Stuxnet infected transfer switches that prevented the generator supporting reactors 5 and 6 from saving reactors 1-3 would not allow them to have the flat bed mounted generators provide power to reactors 1-3 as well, so the disaster could unfold by the script.

For all the details, read the Fukushima report, it is a massive report without an ounce of fluff and it put me on the run and cost me my well being. You cannot dig the facts about an act of war to that level of detail and get away unscathed.

The big question is WHY would Israel trigger a tsunami and destroy a nuclear facility?

The answer is simple

The world banks, Goldman Sachs, and other financial tyrants had gotten into a routine of bankrupting nations via massive “banker bailouts”, and Japan was having none of it. When they approached Japan for their “bailout”, which was in NO WAY OWED, the same way America’s bailout was in NO WAY OWED, and exceeded loan defaults by over 10X, loans which when defaulted on still resulted in the loss of homes (the U.S. “bailout” was a total fraud, used as a cover story for Nuclear Blackmail READ THAT ONE, IT IS A CORNERSTONE TO UNDERSTANDING ALL OF THIS,

Anyway, the Japanese had a strong economy with no debt and they got approached the same way with the threat of destruction and said NO. As a result, the global scamming elite delivered a fake man made earthquake and nuclear tsunami, and topped it off with a disaster at Fukushima.

Now the Japanese are now donating TRILLIONS to the world bank, “willfully” to “end world poverty”. This means that certain poor impoverished boys will receive solid gold kippas as bar mitzvot gifts.

Other nations are now blackmailed READ THAT LINK ALSO, it is important,

And if things do not go EXACTLY the way the zionist bankers/sachs/ and other “elite” criminals want, other nations will now suffer nuclear armageddons the same way Japan did.

Sites ENE news and Rense are being used to cover up the reality of NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL with eye catching stories about dead starfish and diseased salmon.

I know full well that  stories like these are serving ONE PURPOSE – to cover up the reality that the Japan earthquake and subsequent nuclear disaster were both acts of war and shift the blame away from Israel and others in the U.S. who were involved in this attack on Japan so the threat of nuclear blackmail can still be used to keep nations subservient to a chosen elite.

The threat of nuclear blackmail only works if the only people who know about it are key people in national governments. If the public at large knew what was really going on behind the scenes, Israel would be TOAST TOAST TOAST, average people would pressure their governments to nuke Israel off the face of the earth, regardless of what it cost them in the form of virus attacks and exploded nuclear facilities as well as having nuclear weapons go off. The article nuclear blackmail explains how Helium 3 is now missing for no reason, other than to disable neutrino detectors which has allowed the IDF to get nuclear weapons smuggled into nations. Israel does not need a nuclear missile delivery system if the nukes are already planted in key places in the victim nations. Pay up, or BOOM.

By sounding too shrill for reality, sites like ENE news are causing moderate thinking people to turn a blind eye toward the entire topic of the Japan disaster, and thereby a blind eye to the reality of nuclear blackmail.

It is true that Japan is for the most part wrecked by reactor 3, but it really is Japan’s problem. The Pacific ocean will survive this no problem. There won’t be any problems with radioactive beaches, if you hear this “west coast is frying” crap, run from whoever posts it as fast as possible. Many police cars have well calibrated Geiger counters in them, and they still pull over radiotherapy patients. If Fukushima radiation was that bad in the U.S., a radiotherapy patient would not show up on a police Geiger counter while speeding 70 mph in the opposite direction because radiotherapy patients are barely radioactive at all. That one key indicator can call B.S. on a lot of the mania with regard to the West Coast frying. Fat chance any of these police car mounted Geiger counters would be useful in much of Japan though, huge portions of Japan are totally screwed. And that is EXACTLY how the nuclear blackmailers want it

Erol Kalkan, a former Turkish Persian now working for the USGS, fabricated phony USGS ground accelerations to support a 9.0 scenario, and the U.S. government is still unfortunately trusted with this type of work. So Europe and the rest of the world are looking at the phony USGS reports while the Japanese seismologists spin in their graves (I am assuming most of them have been killed by now to silence them). Erol Kalkan’s charts in no way match the Japanese seismic records, and to prove it, JUST WATCH THE TSUNAMI VIDEOS ON YOUTUBE. All of the Japanese seismic records, and Erol Kalkan’s scam, are in the Fukushima report.

Additionally, to see what happens to Japan in only a 6.9 earthquake, just use Google images and look at what happened in the Kobe earthquake. There is a limit to how well things can be built, and even Japan suffers from only a 6.9. Seismic energy increases by 37X for every magnitude increase, so the 3/11 quake was supposed to be 37X37 times as strong as the Kobe quake. Where is the massive inland damage from it then?

Source: http://beforeitsnews.com/japan-earthquake/2014/01/fukushima-sabotage-2445230.html

Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an Elaborate Hoax

by Vivian Lee, Sofia Smallstorm, James Tracy, Jim Fetzer and the Sandy Hook Research Group

“[T]he names and ‘contextually identifying information of involved children’ were withheld, including descriptions of the children, their clothing and their belongings”–Reuben F. Bradford, Commissioner, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection

Everyone must check inThe New York Times, our nation’s newspaper of record (which records the “official history” of the United States), has reported that, with its “final report,” the criminal investigation of Sandy Hook by the State of Connecticut is over. 

Remarkably, the report does not even include the names, the ages or the sex of the alleged victims of the shooting. There is no actual identification of any of the dead. Even the Danbury, CT, Newstimes found it unsatisfying.

And those who have actually studied these events may be disposed to hold The Times responsible for a stunning display of journalistic incompetence on a matter of enormous public concern. 

Anyone with the inclination can comb through hundreds of years of American crime reports and will not find an instance in the which the names, the ages or the sex of the victims is not given–with the exception of victims of sex crimes.  Withholding this information is part of a pattern of deception and deceit that extends to the Clerk of Newtown making secret arrangements with the state legislature to avoid releasing death certificates to the public, attempts to withhold the 911 calls and gag orders imposed upon those responsible for tearing down the building itself:

In a letter accompanying the report, Reuben F. Bradford, the commissioner of the state’s Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, said the names and “contextually identifying information of involved children” were withheld, including descriptions of the children, their clothing and their belongings. “All visual images depicting the deceased have been withheld,” he added, “as well as written descriptions whose disclosure would be highly offensive to a reasonable person and would violate the constitutional rights of the families.”

The commissioner said that balancing the “often competing interests of government transparency and individual privacy has been difficult,” but the situation is completely absurd.  This appears to be only the latest in a series of obscene measures being adopted to conceal from the public that the Sandy Hook “massacre” was in fact an elaborately staged hoax, which no one who takes a serious look at the evidence can reasonably deny because, in view of what we have now proven about the event, no alternative explanation is reasonable.

The basic principle that applies here is inference to the best explanation. Consider the totality of the evidence in this case.  Is the evidence more probable on the hypothesis that Sandy Hook was a real event or that it was instead an exercise (or a “drill”) , which was presented as though it had been a real event?  The hypothesis that confers the highest probability on the evidence is the preferable, which, when the evidence has “settled down,” is acceptable as true in the tentative and fallible fashion of science. Here are the “top ten” reasons that support the conclusion that Sandy Hook was staged and not real, where no children or adults appear to have died there.

1. Proof of death has been suppressed

UntitledTwenty-eight people allegedly died: 27 children and adults, including Adam Lanza,  at the school, and his mother, Nancy Lanza, in her home at 36 Yogananda Street, Newtown. However, there is no direct proof of their death: no photographic evidence or video footage was released to confirm the official story that these 28 persons actually died. In fact, no video surveillance footage shows anything—not even Adam shooting out the front plate-glass window or walking through the halls like Rambo, even though this is a school that had updated its security system at the start of the 2012-13 academic year.

The best the authorities could come up with was a heavily redacted report that includes numerous photos of the inside of the school, with a few dings that look like bullet holes, several bullets on the floor, and many black images with white numbers, which we are supposed to associate with dead people. One photo (left) shows the blown-out glass window through which Adam Lanza presumably entered the premises. But how did he get past the furniture, with all his weaponry, without moving anything out of position?

Compounding the situation, the parents were not even allowed to view their children’s bodies to identify them. Instead, they were reportedly shown photographs of the deceased. This was done, according to the Medical Examiner, Wayne Carver, in order to “control the situation.” But what was there about the situation that required “control”? No parent of our acquaintance would have agreed to accept the death of a child without viewing the body. James Tracy has published a discussion of the medical examiner’s performance.  According to Carver:

Uh, we did not bring the bodies and the families into contact. We took pictures of them, uhm, of their facial features. We have, uh, uh—it’s easier on the families when you do that. Un, there is, uh, a time and place for the up close and personal in the grieving process, but to accomplish this we thought it would be best to do it this way and, uh, you can sort of, uh … You can control a situation depending on the photographer, and I have very good photographers. Uh, but uh—

Remarkably, the state has done its best to avoid releasing the death certificates and even recordings of the 911 calls. Death certificates were eventually “released” but not to the public or those who might want to investigate the case further, where only a short, general summary was available. According to The New York Times, in relation to the 911 calls, “no children are identified by name, no callers indicate that they can see a child being shot, and the only injury described is that of an educator’s being shot in the foot.”

Moreover, the funerals were all “closed casket,” with one exception—that of Noah Pozner. As recounted in interviews with the families, the circumstances of their last encounters with their children (or with their caskets) are strange to say the least. The “love fest” at the white coffin of Grace McDonnell was detailed on CNN for Anderson Cooper:


YouTube – Veterans Today -

Veronique Pozner gave her account of her last look at her son Noah to the Jewish Daily Forward on 26 December 2013.

Veronique asked the medical examiners not to autopsy her son; she felt that his body had suffered too many indignities. At his funeral, Noah was dressed in a suit and tie. A Jewish friend of Veronique’s at work enjoined Rabbi Praver to allow him to be wrapped in a blue tallis, even though he had not yet had a bar mitzvah.The family placed stuffed animals, a blanket and letters to Noah into the casket. Lastly, Veronique put a clear plastic rock with a white angel inside — an “angel stone” — in his right hand. She asked the funeral director to place an identical one in his left, which was badly mangled.

Just before the ceremony, Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy came to the funeral home to pay his respects. Veronique took him by the arm and brought him to the casket. Noah’s famously long eyelashes — which she spoke about in her eulogy — rested lightly on his cheeks and a cloth covered the place where the lower half of his face had been. “I just needed it to be real for [the governor],” she says. “This was a live, warm, energetic little boy whose life was snuffed out in a fraction of a second because our schools are so defenseless.”

2. Emergency protocols were not followed

There is no evidence of any frantic effort to save lives or to remove bodies to hospitals; instead the scene outside the school looked calm and largely bloodless—with police and other personnel milling around casually and a severe shortage of dead or injured victims. One Sandy Hook researcher decided to call Lt. Paul Vance to ask who cleaned up the blood, which would have been considered to be a bio-hazard, and got the reply, “What blood?” Here is Jim Fetzer’s interview with Kelley from Tulsa on “The Real Deal” where she discusses this, which also includes several of the 911 calls:

The Real Deal podcast with Kelly

Kelley was onto a real issue. Under the CT Medical Waste Tracking Act of 1988, a paper trail must kept by all parties involved in the clean up and must be tracked all the way to the incinerator with names and dates.

In a Mass Casualty Incident (MCI) like Sandy Hook, the proper protocol is START triage (Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment) using tarps of different colors with the aim being to save lives and get the injured to the hospital for treatment.  Not even the black tarps for the dead were used, much less the red ones for those who needed immediate treatment.  As Sofia Smallstorm has documented, nothing at all like this occurred at Sandy Hook: the appropriate protocols were not followed:


YouTube – Veterans Today -

Sandy Hook Fire Chief Bill Halstead was ready to help the victims but could recall only two wounded people. A few survivors were reportedly taken to the hospital, but, oddly, these people were never interviewed. There were no first-hand accounts that proved anyone was killed or injured. Nonetheless, according to Lt. Vance, 18 children were pronounced dead at the scene, two children were removed to “an area hospital” and were pronounced dead at the hospital, and seven adults were pronounced dead at the scene, including the shooter (NBC).

No emergency vehicles were present at the school or even lined up in the fire lane for a rescue attempt—the parking lot was filled with parked cars, police cars and possibly media vehicles. Such rescue activity as occurred was centered, not on the school premises, but at the nearby Firehouse. Emergency vehicles at the Firehouse were jammed together impeding access to the school, in case anyone might have thought about attempting a rescue. The scene at the Firehouse was quite peculiar, with people milling around and circling through the building, walking out one door and into another, to give the impression of lots of people and lots of action:


YouTube – Veterans Today -

3. Drill protocols were followed instead

We are now living in a security state, and the school system is among its beneficiaries. While we used to have “fire drills” from time to time, we now have “lockdown drills” implemented by school districts, with some states requiring a set number of drills by law. Private security firms, which operate for profit, now conduct “crisis preparedness assessments” at the tax-payer’s expense.

Larger scenarios are also developed as active-shooter drills, in which local law enforcement can take part in storming a school in pursuit of an active-actor-shooter. One such plan available on the web is “Operation Closed Campus” developed in Iowa following guidance set forth by the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) of the US Department of Homeland Security.

According to protocol, everyone at the drill must check in, identification badges are issued to personnel and observers, and drinking water and restrooms are available. Personnel include the director, staff, controllers, evaluators, actors, media personnel and “players” (agency employees) both in uniforms and civilian clothes. This protocol appears to have been followed at Sandy Hook, where many participants wore ID/identification badges on lanyards, a huge check-in sign is visible and even Porta Potties are at the ready.


YouTube – Veterans Today -

An emergency preparedness drill took place on 14 December 2012, 9 AM to 4 PM/ET, in Bridgeport, CT, which is a 20 minute drive from Sandy Hook. The course was run by the Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection/Emergency Management and Homeland Security, entitled “Planning for the Needs of Children in Disasters.”

The Sandy Hook “shooting” appears to have been an Integrated Capstone Event (ICE), an exercise run by FEMA to coordinate federal, state and local emergency response teams in the case of a mass-casualty event. As such, it would have utilized actors and media partners to simulate a tragedy in order to train participants, and also in order to observe the reaction of the citizenry.

4. There was foreknowledge of the event

The Connecticut state emergency system was taken over long before the “massacre” occurred, with a frequency change implemented five hours in advance of the “shooting.” Normal police and EMS dispatch protocol, using the Alpha Phonetic System for communications between officers and dispatchers, was replaced with staged transmissions by non-trained personnel.

In addition, tweets about the shooting began before it occurred, a tribute was apparently uploaded one month before the event, and web pages honoring the victims, including a Facebook page R.I.P. Victoria Soto, were established before they had “officially” died.


YouTube – Veterans Today -

A Sandy Hook timeline has been reconstructed at memoryholeblog.com, detailing major developments and highlighting the numerous inconsistencies in reports by the media.

5. There were contradictory reports about the weapons

According to initial reports in the media, weapons used in the shooting included four handguns recovered at the scene, the only guns taken into the school (NBC). Then an AR-15 was said to have been found in the trunk of Lanza’s car (NBC). Then it was reported that Lanza may have carried only two handguns and that a rifle was also found in the school (NBC).

Dr. Carver's bizarre presss conference

Wayne Carver, the Medical Examiner, said that all the victims were shot with the “long weapon.” Lt. Paul Vance then said that a Bushmaster AR-15 assault weapon with high capacity magazines was used “most of the time” and that Lanza was carrying “many high-capacity clips” for the weapon (Huffington Post).

In January 2013, Connecticut state police released a statement indicating that they had found four guns inside the school: a Bushmaster .223 caliber XM 15-E2S semi-automatic rifle with high capacity 30 round clips, a Glock 10-mm handgun and a Sig-Sauer P226 9mm handgun. They said they also found an Izhmash Canta-12 12-gauge shotgun in Lanza’s car (NBC).

This shotgun is also shown in a video aired on the night of 14 December 2013  by NBC. An evidence collection team and a policeman find the gun in the trunk of Lanza’s Honda Civic—the policeman handles the gun without gloves and ejects the ammunition on the spot. Some have seen two long guns in the trunk in the NBC video: the 12-gauge shotgun and the Bushmaster rifle.


YouTube – Veterans Today -

Lt. Vance then asserted that Lanza had killed all his victims with the .223-caliber semi-automatic rifle (ctpost.com). Regarding the confusion, Vance told reporters, “It’s all these conspiracy theorists that are trying to mucky up the waters.” Perhaps “The Top Prize for Fantastical Reporting” goes to Fox News, however, which announced that a 12-gauge shotgun along with two magazines containing 70 rounds of Winchester 12-gauge shotgun rounds had been found in the glove compartment of Adam Lanza’s Honda Civicthat’s right, in the glove compartment.

6. Adam Lanza cannot have done the shooting

Adam Lanza, reportedly a frail young man weighing 120 pounds with Asperger’s Syndrome, is said to have carried massive weaponry on his person when he shot his way into the Sandy Hook school and proceeded to kill 26 people and then himself. This after he supposedly killed his mother before driving to the school.

Adam Lanza

According to State’s Attorney Stephen Sedensky, Lanza killed his 26 victims with the Bushmaster .223-caliber rifle and then killed himself with his Glock 10-mm handgun. Lanza was also supposedly carrying three 30-round magazines for the Bushmaster as well as a Sig-Sauer 9 mm handgun (see above). The victims were shot multiple times each in a fusillade of bullets from these military-style weapons. In order to wreak this havoc, he fired more than 150 rounds, and he must have carried more rounds in addition. Lanza was reportedly found dead wearing a bulletproof vest and military-style clothing (AP).

As Mike Powers, a professional military investigator and ballistics expert, has observed, this young man of slight build could not have carried all these heavy, bulky weapons and ammunition on his person. Furthermore, since first responders were supposedly inside the school within seven minutes, there was not enough time for Lanza to have carried out the shooting as reported. In an interview with Joyce Riley, Powers states that Lanza could not have fired so many times continuously without destabilizing himself from the intense noise from the Bushmaster. As a novice, he could not have shot an AR-15 with such speed and accuracy, supposedly changing magazines 8-10 times without a stoppage.

According to Lt. Vance on the night of the shooting, one victim survived. So in less than seven minutes—or less than five minutes according to the media—Lanza killed 26 people and then himself, producing only one injured victim. This is a 96% kill ratio, which is unheard-of accuracy among the most experienced marksmen. Powers thinks the whole scenario is a physical impossibility. He is not even convinced that Adam Lanza was a real person. The story of the shooting should not be taken seriously.


YouTube – Veterans Today -

The final travesty involves the weapons and other paraphernalia that were allegedly found in the Lanza house. The “arsenal” supposedly included guns, Samurai swords, knives, a bayonet and more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition, according to search warrants released. Other items of interest were ear and eye protection, binoculars, holsters, manuals, paper targets, a military-style uniform and Lanza’s NRA certificate (Fox). Lanza had reportedly compiled a spreadsheet 7 feet long and 4 feet wide in 9-point type detailing 500 victims of other mass murders (CBS). We are supposed to believe this, and, at the same time, that Adam Lanza was a shy, quiet kid who didn’t like noise and chaos, as promoted by the PBS Frontline Special, “Raising Adam Lanza.”

7. Key participants displayed inappropriate behavior

There are many bizarre media reports and interviews of those associated with the “shooting.” Some examples:

Wayne Carver—Medical Examiner Wayne Carver’s surreal press conference is one of the most startling of all the media offerings. Widely available on youtube, this event shows H. Wayne Carver II, a public official of some standing, clowning and acting outlandish—grinning strangely, making irrelevant comments, and basically appearing unknowledgeable and unprofessional.


YouTube – Veterans Today -

Robbie Parker—Perhaps the most famous press conference is that of Robbie Parker, the alleged father of victim Emilie Parker, speaking on a CNN report of December 15, 2012. He chuckles as he walks up to the camera, then gets into character by hyperventilating, and finally feigns distress as he talks about his daughter—and about the fund set up to help raise money “for Emilie.”


YouTube – Veterans Today -

The families—In addition to Robbie and Alissa Parker, other parents and family members take their turn in the spotlight, including (but not limited to) Mark and Jackie Barden, Jimmy Greene and Nelba Marquez-Greene, Ian and Nicole Hockley, Neil Heslin (alleged father of Jesse Lewis), Chris and Lynn McDonnell, Veronique Pozner, Carlee Soto, and David and Francine Wheeler. Anderson Cooper is the interviewer in two notable instances: his conversation with the McDonnells mentioned above, and an interview with Veronique Pozner, remarkable for its green-screen effects such as Anderson’s disappearing nose.


YouTube – Veterans Today -

The school nurse—Numerous reports offer detailed and totally fictitious information, some of which was later abandoned in favor of more tenable versions. On the evening of December 14, a USA Today reporter said she had spoken with the school nurse, whom she had met on the street. The nurse told her that the gunman had come into her office, “they met eyes, she jumped under her desk,” and he walked out.  The nurse said that the gunman was the son of the kindergarten teacher, who was known to her and “an absolutely loving person.” It later developed that Nancy Lanza had not been a kindergarten teacher at all, and that neither Nancy nor Adam had any connection to Sandy Hook school whatsoever.


YouTube – Veterans Today -

Dawn Hochsprung—In an embarrassing fiction, The Newtown Bee reported on 14 December 2013  that Dawn Hochsprung, the Sandy Hook school principal, told the paper that a masked man had entered the school with a rifle and started shooting multiple shots – more than she could count – that went “on and on.” Of course, Dawn Hochsprung was allegedly killed by Adam Lanza and so could not easily have provided this statement. In fact, Dawn was said to have acted heroically, dying while lunging at the gunman—although one wonders who witnessed and reported this act of heroism. On 17 December 2013, The Bee retracted the report and apologized:

An early online report from the scene at the December 14 shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School quoted a woman who identified herself to our reporter as the principal of the school. The woman was not the school’s principal, Dawn Hochsprung, who was killed in the Friday morning attack. The quote was removed from subsequent online versions of the story, but the original story did remain in our online archive for three days before being deleted. We apologize for whatever confusion this may have caused our readers and for any pain or anguish it may have caused the Hochsprung family.

Gene Rosen—Gene Rosen is one of the most prolific of the Sandy Hook media stars, giving animated and conflicting statements to a series of reporters (in English and Spanish). Considered a “good Samaritan” by the mainstream media, Gene supposedly harbored six children who ran away from the school, rode to his house on a school bus, sat down on his lawn and proceeded to cry and tell him that their teacher, Miss Soto, was dead. Strangely, Rosen took the children inside and gave them some toys to play with, instead of calling 911 like any normal person.


YouTube – Veterans Today -

The Gene Rosen videos are important for the official narrative, in that they corroborate many of its details: the staccato gunfire (and thus a semi-automatic weapon) and heresay evidence from the children (Lanza had a big gun and a little gun, Vicki Soto was killed, etc.).These incriminating videos are some of the best evidence that the Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax.

8. Photos at scene and of victims look staged or fake

The only photo we have seen of any children being evacuated from the school was apparently taken earlier in the fall during a drill (no coats, smiling faces). Shannon Hicks, a photographer for The Newtown Bee, took the photo and claims to have taken many others of the event—which have not been released.

Shannon Hicks

Hicks reportedly took this photo “as an associate editor” and then, when another editor arrived, “changed into her firefighting gear and tried to help.” The account was promoted by NPR.

Parker family

Perhaps more insidious are the photographs of the children who allegedly died at Sandy Hook, many of which are concoctions prepared on Photoshop. Some of the most problematic involve the Parker family, with Emilie’s red-and-black dress supposedly worn by her younger sister for the visit with Obama.


YouTube – Veterans Today -

The photograph of Victoria Soto’s class of students has been shown to be an elaborate composite:


YouTube – Veterans Today -

And many of the individual images of the children released to the media are peculiar—some look outdated and may be old photos.  In a very sloppy slip-up, a photo of a real child, Lily Gaubert (right, below), who is alive and well, was promoted in the media as an image of Allison Wyatt (left, below), an alleged victim. Lily’s mother discovered the error and made it public.

Allison Wyatt vs. Lily Gaubert

And the ridiculously fraudulent photographs of Adam Lanza clearly do not depict a real person:


YouTube – Veterans Today -

9. The crime scene was completely destroyed

As with Ground Zero after 9/11, Sandy Hook Elementary and all the evidence have been completely obliterated; $50 million in CT state funds were allocated for the demolition and rebuilding of Sandy Hook school. This would never have been tolerated if an actual crime had been committed—at least one that was meant to be investigated. The demolition of the school has now been declared complete.
Sandy Hook demolition

Employees who worked on the project were required to sign non-disclosure agreements. They were not only prohibited from removing anything from the site, but they were forbidden from discussing publicly anything they may have observed or not observed during the demolition, such as an absence of bullet marks on the walls or blood on the floor of the classrooms.

10. Deceased children sang at the Super Bowl

Recent research has resulted in a “Sandy Hoax Surprise,” a convincing youtube video identifying eight alleged Sandy Hook victims and six of their brothers singing in the Newtown children’s choir at the 2013 Super Bowl.


YouTube – Veterans Today -

One more victim has been identified since the original video, making a total of 15 out of the 21 children in the choir who were from the Sandy Hook “families.” The newly recognized “victims” are all older than they appear in their photos, giving credence to the theory that the children’s photographs were outdated images.


YouTube – Veterans Today -

The Newtown children, whoever they are, seem quite happy to be singing at the Super Bowl, smiling and running across the field after the event—giving no sign of the trauma they had been through less than two months prior. So are these children actually alive? One can only hope. 

Cui bono?

The evidence demonstrates (1) that proof of death has been suppressed, (2) that emergency protocols were not followed, (3) that drill protocols were followed, (4) that there was foreknowledge of the event, (5) that there was confusion over what weapons were used, (6) that the suspect cannot possibly have carried out the shooting as claimed, (7) that strange behavior was displayed by officials, witnesses and relatives, (8) that there are many odd photos of participants, (9) that the crime scene was destroyed under conditions of secrecy and (10) that some of the children appeared at the Super Bowl.

With the possible exception of (5) and (9), all of these features would have low probabilities had Sandy Hook been a massacre but high probabilities were it merely a drill.  Some of them are decisive by themselves, such as (1), (2), (3), (4) and (6)–not to mention (10).  EMTs cannot make determinations of whether a victim is dead or alive, so there should have been a surge of EMTs into the building to rush those little bodies off to hospitals where doctors could determine their condition.  But that was not done–and nothing else about this event supports the conclusion that it was real. On the contrary, virtually everything indicates that this was a drill.

Going in circles

The probability of the evidence on the hypothesis that this was a drill is overwhelmingly greater than on the hypothesis that it was an actual massacre. And the evidence appears to have “settled down” and point in the same direction. No alternative is reasonable, which means it has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. So who did it and why? This is the final question. If the perpetrator had been Adam Lanza, then he had no apparent motive, as even “the final report” acknowledged.  When considering cui bono (who benefits), a large amount of money is at stake–and much of it has already been distributed.

Follow the Money

First of all, the construction industry got a boost, with the $50 million in Connecticut state funds allocated for the destruction of Sandy Hook School and to rebuild a new school on the premises. And this from a state with a projected budget deficit of $1.1 billion for the coming year.

The Sandy Hook School Support Fund has raised approximately $12 million and distributed it to the Newtown-Sandy Hook Community Foundation, overseen by Ken Feinberg, “a victim compensation master with a national reputation,” according to United Way Western Connecticut. And the Support Fund posted its condolences on 11 December 2013, which was three days before the actual event.

Premature announcements

The estimated payout was $281,000 paid to each of the victims’ families, who have raised additional funds from their own websites—some of which were apparently advertised on the web in advance of the shooting. At present, all of the victims, both children and adults, have memorial funds that are currently collecting money.

“Sandy Hook Promise,” which actively solicits money for family members and others “impacted by this tragedy,” as well as for lobbying for “mental wellness and gun safety,” currently boasts over 300,000 people who have made the “Sandy Hook Promise” to turn the “tragedy into a moment of transformation.”

The federal government has also forked over a lot of taxpayer money, including a $150,000 federal grant to Newtown to pay for two “school resource officers” (aka police), and $2.5 million in federal funds to compensate the local entities for their trouble: $663,444 to the Connecticut State Police, $602,293 to the town of Newtown, $882,812 to the town of Monroe and $296,838 to other partner agencies. This hush money is sure to keep the lid on things for now.

Gun Control

The families have been out in force, appearing on television and in print, lobbying for gun control in the states and the US capitol. By now, their stories are known to everyone in America. This has created an impression that the Sandy Hook hoax was about gun control. Meanwhile, however, the gun industry has benefited immensely.

Efforts to increase security in schools—and even arm teachers—are underway. The New York Times reports that around 1,500 state gun bills have been introduced since the time of the shooting, and 109 have become law. However, nearly two-thirds of these laws ease legal restrictions and support the rights of gun owners.

This may well have been an unintentional consequence of an intentional plan. Nonetheless, it is not clear that the Sandy Hook event was carried out solely with the aim of disarming the American public. Perhaps we are seeing a kind of Homeland-Gladio—implementing a strategy of tension with real and simulated events. Remarkably, one of the earliest school safety/gun control proposals came from the family of Noah Pozner:

New Proposal from Noah Pozner family

Both the gun industry and the already immense and rapidly growing “security industry” have also benefitted from the Sandy Hook “shooting,” as we, the citizens of the United States, lose more of our Constitutional rights. A more subtle but nonetheless insidious effect relates to the promotion of mental health screening and the consequent medication of the “mentally unstable” in our society, based upon an event that did not take place, where President Obama has signed an on-going series of executive orders to implement a political agenda. For the latest, check this one out.

The emergence of the Department of Homeland Security as a major threat to democracy cannot go without comment. Even though a subcommittee of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Intelligence released a report on 3 October 2012 establishing the virtual non-existence of domestic terrorist threats, DHS has acquired more than 2 billion rounds of .40 calibre hollow-point ammunition. Sandy Hook appears to be part of a complex and evolving scenario, beginning with 9/11, to establish an enhanced Police State. Whether or not it succeeds depends on public awareness and political action.

Vivian Lee, Ph.D., is a Sandy Hook researcher and professor at an East Coast University. Sofia Smallstorm is an independent researcher, who produced and directed “Unraveling Sandy Hook.” James Tracy, Ph.D., maintains a web site at memoryholeblog.com. And Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth.

Source: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/01/07/top-ten-reasons-sandy-hook-was-an-elaborate-hoax/

John Friend interviewed Dr. Fetzer on The Realist Report January 8, 2014.

Listen here.

Read the accompanying article.

Sen. Lindsey Graham should be muzzled!

Graham to Congress: ‘Let’s Just Blow Up Iran’

Forget Syria; Lindsey Graham is going straight for Iran.

The Republican Senator from South Carolina announced on Saturday that he is going to officially approach Congress to seek military authorization for a strike on Iran to destroy the nation’s nuclear program.

The Blaze reports:

“Graham, speaking on Gov. Mike Huckabee’s Fox News program, said the move will work to make sure we send ‘a clear signal that this debacle called Syria doesn’t mean we’re confused about Iran.’”

Is this a signal that Iran was the goal of Syrian intervention all along? Senator Graham has been warning that if we don’t bomb Syria, it will lead to war with Iran within six months.

Graham has a long history of warmongering, especially when it comes to Iran. Back in 2010 at an AIPAC meeting, the Senator told the pro-Israel lobby that, “The Congress has your back” and Israel is “our best friend in the world.” He went on to say “all options must be on the table” and “you know exactly what I’m talking about” when it comes to potentially bombing Iran.

In addition, Graham’s top campaign contributors include Boeing and General Electric — key military-industrial complex players that would profit heavily off any war.

Likewise, the Senator has shown his readiness to abandon the Constitution and Bill of Rights, particularly under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), to strip suspects of due process rights in the name of the neverending War on Terror:

Graham: “And when they say, ‘I want my lawyer, you tell them shut up! You don’t get a lawyer! You’re an enemy combatant and we’re gonna talk to you about why you joined al Qaeda.”

Let’s not forget, Senator Graham was casually scaremongering his constituents just a few weeks ago that Iran might nuke South Carolina:

Found in the CBS report entitled ‘Graham: Nukes In Hands Of Terrorists Could Result In Bomb Coming To Charleston Harbor’, the report details Graham’s warning that a lack of military action in Syria could result in a nuclear ‘bombing’ in CharlestonSouth Carolina — the very destination of the black ops nuclear transfer. The CBS report reads:

“He [Graham] says if there is no U.S. response [to Syria], Iran will not believe America’s resolve to block Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Graham also says those nuclear weapons in the hands of terrorists could result in a bomb coming to Charleston Harbor.”

Graham is quite literally saying that if we do not launch a war with Syria, South Carolina may be nuked.

Then again, what do we know? After all, Graham has said independent journalists like us don’t really deserve the protections of the First Amendment:

“Who is a journalist is a question we need to ask ourselves,” he [Graham] said. “Is any blogger out there saying anything—do they deserve First Amendment protection? These are the issues of our times.”

Huh. And here we thought everyone was entitled to the natural right of free speech.

In other news, President Obama told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos that Iran shouldn’t think that just because the U.S. backed off from striking Syria, America would hesitate to bomb Iran.

http://truthstreammedia.com/sen-lindsey-graham-to-congress-lets-just-blow-up-iran-2/

WW~Notes: AIPAC has Sen. Graham running for cover.  He must have been very naughty.  The only other answer to this paranoid pack of lies is that he’s suffering from madness, or, some other form of insanity.  He should be recalled and sent home before he does any further damage, immediately. 

The Loss of Bodily Integrity in an Emerging Police State

The Fourth Amendment was intended to protect the citizenry—both our property and our bodies—from “unreasonable searches and seizures” by government agents. Unfortunately, as John Whitehead reveals in this week’s vodcast, the rights supposedly guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution have been steadily eroded over the past few decades, leaving Americans literally stranded on the side of the road, grasping for dignity.

WW~Notes: This is a disturbing video!  Watch at your own risk due to the disclosure of unbridled truth regarding “strip searches” in America today. 

Are People Being Thrown In Psychiatric Wards For Their Political Views?

Mental Health Diagnoses Are Sometimes Politically-Motivated

Many psychologists and psychiatrists are good people, who are only trying to help their patients.

But the Nazi government substantially supported psychologists … many of whom, in turn, espoused extermination of the people they considered to be “racially and cognitively compromised”.

Soviet psychiatrists famously aided Stalin in applying fake insanity diagnoses to political dissenters.

American psychologists created the American program of torture which was specially-crafted to produce false confessions to justify U.S. military policy. And see this.

And authoritarian American psychologists are eager to label anyone “taking a cynical stance toward politics, mistrusting authority, endorsing democratic practices, … and displaying an inquisitive, imaginative outlook” as worthy of a trip to the insane asylum. (Those traits may also get one labeled as a potential terrorist.)

Even psychologists with good intentions can erroneously label people delusional simply because they themselves make bad assumptions.

There is even a label for this – the “Martha Mitchell Effect” – defined as:

The process by which a psychiatrist, psychologist, or other mental health clinician mistakes the patient’s perception of real events as delusional and misdiagnoses accordingly.

The authors of a paper on this phenomenon (Bell, V., Halligan, P.W., Ellis, H.D. (2003) Beliefs About Delusions. The Psychologist, 6 (8), 418-422) conclude:

Sometimes, improbable reports are erroneously assumed to be symptoms of mental illness [due to a] failure or inability to verify whether the events have actually taken place, no matter how improbable intuitively they might appear to the busy clinician.

In other words, psychologists who haven’t taken the time to examine for themselves the claims of their patients will tend to label as delusional anything which they “intuitively” feel is improbable.  As such, psychologists and psychiatrists are just as prone to acting out their irrational prejudices as anyone else … unless they take the time to investigate and educate themselves.

Governments Indefinitely Detaining Citizens In Psychiatric Wards Without Due Process of Law

As such, detention in psych wards on mere “suspicion” of posing a danger – without due process of law – is troubling.

For example, former marine Brandon Raub was just carted off and locked in a psychiatric ward for his allegedly “anti-government” Facebook posts.

AP reports today:

Police – acting under a state law that allows emergency, temporary psychiatric commitments upon the recommendation of a mental health professional – took Raub to the John Randolph Medical Center in Hopewell. He was not charged with any crime.

***

Col. Thierry Dupuis, the county police chief, said Raub was taken into custody upon the recommendation of mental health crisis intervention workers. He said the action was taken under the state’s emergency custody statute, which allows a magistrate to order the civil detention and psychiatric evaluation of a person who is considered potentially dangerous.

Claire Swinney of New Zealand was also held in a psychiatric ward and called “delusional” for criticizing the government.  Susan Lindauer was held under the Patriot Act for a year at Carswell Air Force Base, where psychiatric drugs were pushed on her.

The Daily Mail notes:

The [British] Government has established a shadowy new national anti-terrorist unit to protect VIPs, with the power to detain suspects indefinitely using mental health laws.

***

The team’s psychiatrists and psychologists then have the power to order treatment – including forcibly detaining suspects in secure psychiatric units.

Using these powers, the unit can legally detain people for an indefinite period without trial, criminal charges or even evidence of a crime being committed and with very limited rights of appeal.

Until now it has been the exclusive decision of doctors and mental health professionals to determine if someone should be forcibly detained.

But the new unit uses the police to identify suspects – increasing fears the line is being blurred between criminal investigation and doctors’ clinical decisions.

***

Scotland Yard, which runs the shadowy unit, refuses to discuss how many suspects have been forcibly hospitalised by the team because of “patient confidentiality”.

***

The purpose of the centre is “to evaluate and manage the risk posed to prominent people by…those who engage in inappropriate or threatening communications or behaviours in the context of abnormally intense preoccupations, many [Many? That means that some are not] of which arise from psychotic illness.”

Who gets to decide what “inappropriate” or “threatening” means?  What if a whistleblower has information that a member of parliament has engaged in bribes?  Would trying to reveal such information constitute “inappropriate or threatening communications or behaviours” in the context of “abnormally intense preoccupations” with that MP’s illegal actions?

The Mail continues:

So-called ‘sectioning’ allows a patient to be held for up to six months before a further psychological assessment. Patients are then reviewed every year to determine if they can be released.

***

Human rights activists fear the team, whose existence has never been publicised, may be being used as a way to detain suspected terrorists without having to put evidence before the courts.

***

Last night human rights group Liberty said the secret unit represented a new threat to civil liberties.

Policy director Gareth Crossman said: “There is a grave danger of this being used to deal with people where there is insufficient evidence for a criminal prosecution.

“This blurs the line between medical decisions and police actions. If you are going to allow doctors to take people’s liberty away, they have to be independent. That credibility is undermined when the doctors are part of the same team as the police.

“This raises serious concerns. First that you have a unit that allows police investigation to lead directly to people being sectioned without any kind of criminal proceedings.

“Secondly, it is being done under the umbrella of anti-terrorism at a time when the Government is looking at ways to detain terrorists without putting them on trial.”

***

The team examined thousands of cases and liaised with the FBI, the US Secret Service, the Capitol Hill Police, which protects Congressmen and Senators, and the Swedish and Norwegian secret services.

***

Shadow Health Secretary Andrew Lansley said: “The Government is trying to bring in a wider definition of mental disorder and is resisting exclusions which ensure that people cannot be treated as mentally disordered on the grounds of their cultural, political or religious beliefs.

“When you hear they are also setting up something like this police unit, it raises questions about quite what their intentions are.

“The use of mental health powers of detention should be confined to the purposes of treatment. But the Government wants to be able to detain someone who is mentally disordered even when the treatment would have no benefit.

“Combined with the idea that someone could be classed as mentally ill on the grounds of their religious beliefs, it is a very worrying scenario.”

Indeed, the whole “indefinite detention” process (which Americans living on American soil are subject to) can be based on circular reasoning:

The government’s indefinite detention policy – stripped of it’s spin – is literally insane, and based on circular reasoning. Stripped of p.r., this is the actual policy:

  • If you are an enemy combatant or a threat to national security, we will detain you indefinitely until the war is over
  • But trust us, we know you are an enemy combatant and a threat to national security

See how that works?

(This is an analogy.  We are not accusing psych wards of using torture.  However, they do often use powerful psychiatric drugs on patients … which can elicit false confessions.)

Are we going to slide into Soviet levels of psychiatric detention of political dissidents?

Unless the spread of psychiatric detention without due process of law is checked, the mere belief that the government is interfering with your liberty may become grounds for locking you away.

Source

Former Marine Indefinitely Detained In Psychiatric Ward Over 9/11 Facebook Posts

(Photo : YouTube/Screenshot) US Marine Brandon Raub was detained by police for posting what may appear to be threatening messages on Facebook. The moments were caught on video and posted on YouTube.

Marine Locked In Mental Ward for Questioning 9/11

Former marine Brandon Raub was carted off by the Feds and locked in a psychiatric ward for his Facebook posts questioning the government’s version of 9/11.

Raub isn’t the first person who has suffered this fate.  Claire Swinney was also held in a psychiatric ward and called “delusional” for claiming government liability for 9/11.   Others have been committed for the same reason over the last decade.

Surely the Feds are right … that kind of talk is crazy, right?

Maybe.  But many of the 9/11 Commissioners themselves don’t buy what the government says about 9/11, they say that the government has covered up the state sponsorship of the 9/11 hijackers, and .

Indeed, while they obviously haven’t said that the government was involved, 9/11 Commissioners have said we need further investigation and that the American people should question 9/11.  Does that mean they should they be committed to the same psych ward which Mr. Raub and Ms. Swinney enjoyed?  Of course not.

Some people believe that 9/11 was wholly unforeseeable.  Others believe that government personnel were criminally negligent in letting 9/11 happen, and then obstructed justice to cover it up.  See this, this, this, this, and this.   Still others believe that rogue government personnel allowed 9/11 to happen, or even played a role in the attacks themselves.

Whatever one believes about 9/11, isn’t our society built on freedom of speech? And if someone has kooky theories, won’t the scientific method and free debate defeat the baseless theories? Isn’t that what modern society is all about?

Raub’s attorney – the head of the non-partisan civil rights law firm The Rutherford Institute – points out that Raub is being indefinitely detained, and says:

For government officials to not only arrest Brandon Raub for doing nothing more than exercising his First Amendment rights but to actually force him to undergo psychological evaluations and detain him against his will goes against every constitutional principle this country was founded upon. This should be a wake-up call to Americans that the police state is here.”

What Do Mental Health Professionals Say About Those Who Question 9/11?

Many sociologists and mental health professionals say that those who believe the official version without any questioning are the ones suffering from psychological defense mechanisms.

Sociologists say that fear of terrorism has made people blindly accept false justifications for war – including the false claim that Saddam had a hand in 9/11(when even the 9/11 Commission says he didn’t).

And the following mental health professionals say that questioning the government’s cut-and-dried version of 9/11 is the sane thing to do:

  • Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, as well as Radiology, at Duke University Medical Center D. Lawrence Burk, Jr., MD
  • Board of Governors Distinguished Service Professor of Psychology and Associate Dean of the Graduate School at Rutgers University Barry R. Komisaruk
  • Distinguished Professor in the Department of Mental Health Law and Policy, Professor of Medicine in the Department of Internal Medicine and Distinguished Professor of Global Health in the College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Michael D. Knox
  • Clinical Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey Laura Schafer
  • Professor Emeritus, Psychology and Neuroscience, Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Michael Gabriel
  • Former Chief Mental Health Coordinator and Director of Manpower Development and Training, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, and Lecturer in Psychology, Boston University Herbert Hoffman
  • Professor of Psychology, University of Chicago and Northwestern University Jack Sawyer
  • Professor Emeritus of Psychology at California Institute of Integral Studies Ralph Metzner
  • Professor Emeritus, Psychology, University of Marburg Gert Sommer
  • Professor of Psychology, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Ralph Hood
  • Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Jefferson Medical College. Former Major, U.S. Army Medical Corps, Vietnam Veteran 7 years service, Jon Bjornson, MD
  • Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from the University of Nebraska and licensed Psychologist Ronald Feintech

There are many other mental health professionals who agree.

Why Are Some Psychologists So Dogmatic?

Russian psychiatrists famously aided Stalin in applying fake insanity diagnoses to political dissenters.

Similarly, American apologists for the powers-that-be are eager to label anyone “taking a cynical stance toward politics, mistrusting authority, endorsing democratic practices, … and displaying an inquisitive, imaginative outlook” as worthy of a trip to the insane asylum. (Those traits may also get one labeled as a potential terrorist.)

But most mental health professionals who assume that those who question 9/11 are crazy are simply victims of the the “Martha Mitchell Effect”:

The process by which a psychiatrist, psychologist, or other mental health clinician mistakes the patient’s perception of real events as delusional and misdiagnoses accordingly.

The authors of a paper on this phenomenon (Bell, V., Halligan, P.W., Ellis, H.D. (2003) Beliefs About Delusions. The Psychologist, 6 (8), 418-422) conclude:

Sometimes, improbable reports are erroneously assumed to be symptoms of mental illness [due to a] failure or inability to verify whether the events have actually taken place, no matter how improbable intuitively they might appear to the busy clinician.

In other words, psychologists who haven’t taken the time to examine for themselves the claims of their patients will tend to label as delusional anything which they “intuitively” feel is improbable.

As such, psychologists and psychiatrists are just as prone to acting out their irrational prejudices as anyone else … unless they take the time to investigate and educate themselves.

Postscript:  We do not condone violence.  Virtually all those who question the government’s version of 9/11 are peaceful, non-violent folks.

Source

Related:
Ex-Marine Brandon Raub Detained for Anti-Government Messages on FaceBook; First Amendment Rights Potentially Violated, Says Civil Liberties Group

A former Marine was detained for psychiatric evaluation after posting several anti-government messages on Facebook. Police are not using the word “arrest” for the matter but “detained” as under state law in Virginia police can allow emergency and temporary psychiatric detention upon the recommendation of a mental health professional.

The Marine, named Brandon Raub, has been in custody after FBI, Secret Service, and Virginia’s Chesterfield County police questioned him last Thursday evening about Facebook posts of a pending revolution.

One of Raub’s message was, “Sharpen my axe; I’m here to sever heads.”

Raub has since been in the John Randolph Medical Center, and has not been charged with any crime.

The detainment of Raub has led to public outcry as people state it might have infringed on Raub’s First Amendment rights. Further complaints came from a YouTube video showing Raub being thrown to the ground by police.

The Rutherford Institute, a Virginia-based civil liberties group, has given Raub one of their attorneys for a hearing scheduled on Monday.

“For government officials to not only arrest Brandon Raub for doing nothing more than exercising his First Amendment rights but to actually force him to undergo psychological evaluations and detain him against his will goes against every constitutional principle this country was founded upon,” said the institute’s executive director John Whitehead.

According to CBS Richmond affiliate WTVR, Raub’s mother Cathleen Thomas said his son has no history of a mental illness.

“He never was violent or psychotic or anything like that,” said Cathleen Thomas to WTVR. “There were just conversations we had back and forth, very deep.”

Another of Raub’s postings was, “There is evil going on all around the world. The United States was meant to lead the charge against injustice, but through our example not our force. People do not respond to having liberty and freedom forced on them.”

“Our views are very strong because we are patriots,” Thomas added. “Our stance in this family is to question everything…when we lose the right to be able to stand up and say how we feel, no matter what it’s about, I think that we need to be very concerned. Because what it speaks to me is that they’re trying to shut people up. They’re trying to squelch the message.”

Raub served as a combat engineer sergeant in both Iraq and Afganistan.

Source