Christopher Bollyn speaks in Gothenburg, Sweden on the deceit and subterfuge of 9/11

Aside from the anti-Nazi remarks this is a very good presentation that covers many aspects of the Jewish/Israeli false flag terror event on 9/11.

Here is the YouTube description:

A lecture by Christopher Bollyn that took place the 25th of May 2014 in Gothenburg Sweden.

Christopher Bollyn is an American journalist who has investigated the events of 9-11. He helped Professor Steven E. Jones in the spring and summer of 2006, when Jones found solid evidence of Thermite in the dust of the Twin Towers. The discovery and discussion of Thermite in the demolition of the World Trade Center led to serious trouble for both Jones and Bollyn. In the end Bollyn had to go into exile.

Christopher Bollyn has written several book on the subject, for example “Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World”.

The lecture was arranged by the Cui Bono Association.

http://www.foreningencuibono.se

9/11 Images from – http://www.nerdylorrin.net/jerry/politics/911/ThePile.html

WTC1scene

World Trade Center Bldg 6 crater.

World Trade Center Bldg 6 crater.

911_8Source: http://www.dailystormer.com/have-we-been-deceived-about-what-happened-on-911-christopher-bollyn/

WW~Notes: Christopher was in fine form during his charged speech on 9/11 nearly 13 years after the event.  The speech and Q&A is two hours and 44 minutes long and well worth watching.  I learned several new aspects on 9/11 that I did not previously know.  Also, you can purchase Chris’ books right here in the sidebar. 

Harper Zionists seek to boost Canada thought crime law

harpernetanyahu
By
Brandon Martinez
April 11th, 2014

The Zionist ruling clique of Canada, through their front-man Stephen Harper, is seeking to beef up the already-existing Orwellian “hate propaganda” law which has been primarily used to curtail criticism of Zionists and Israel.

The conspicuous change is buried in the Harper government’s proposed cyberbullying law, Bill C-13.

The existing law in Canada’s criminal code makes it illegal to “promote hatred” (whatever that means) of people “distinguished by colour, race, religion, ethnic origin or sexual orientation,” explained The Chronicle Herald, but Bill C-13 intends to expand that category to include age, sex, mental or physical disability, and most disturbingly, “national origin.” In other words, you cannot criticize anyone for any reason at all!

This means, say, if you condemn Israelis for their inhumane treatment of Palestinians, you could find yourself in court facing down the self-appointed thought police and commissars of political correctness.

The … law against “hate speech” is illegitimate and ridiculous to begin with. The idea of allowing a government to legislate against opinions and feelings is patently absurd – it is pulled right out of George Orwell’s dystopian classic 1984.

British Columbia native Arthur Topham has felt the wrath of Canada’s censorious establishment. In November 2012, at the instigation of the Zionist society of B’nai B’rith, Topham was charged with a ‘hate crime’ for publishing anti-Zionist articles on his website Radical Press.

One of the items on Topham’s site that made the Zionists convulse and contort with unrestrained anger and rage was a satire called Israel Must Perish. The text was nothing more than a spoof of a 1941 book authored by a Zionist … named Theodore Kaufman entitled Germany Must Perish! In that text Kaufman called for “a final solution” of German extinction. Topham merely substituted the words “German,” “Germany” and “Nazi” with “Israel,” “Jew” and “Zionist” throughout the text. Despite writing a clearly-worded preface explaining the satirical nature of the text, Topham was arrested by the RCMP and now faces the possibility of spending up to two years behind bars for violating Zionist sensibilities.

Many will recall the sad saga of German-Canadian publisher Ernst Zundel. In the mid-1980s Zundel was charged with “spreading false news” after he published a book, Did Six Million Really Die?, which questioned some aspects of the official “holocaust” story. In the ensuing show trial, Zundel and his team of revisionist historians as well as his indefatigable defence lawyer Douglas Christie brought the holocaust lobby to its knees with facts and information refuting many claims made by Zionists about Germany’s WW2 concentration camps.

Over the span of three decades, Zundel was dragged from courtroom to courtroom, from jail cell to jail cell, merely for expressing a viewpoint deemed verboten by the … Zionist establishment – the self-appointed architects of public discourse, the self-declared arbiters of truth and morality, the self-proclaimed “chosen people” whose faults are unseen and whose character is unimpeachable.

Zundel, a self-described pacifist with no criminal record, was physically assaulted on numerous occasions by Jewish Defence League thugs. His Toronto home, which also housed his publishing and graphic arts businesses, was bombed and torched by Zionist terrorists. He received death threats on a daily basis from members of the “chosen race of God,” but the Toronto Police did almost nothing to prevent any of it and was entirely uninterested in pursuing the criminals and thugs responsible for the campaign of terror against Zundel and his associates.

Zundel’s story is a testament to the power and control of Jewish extremists in Canada, whose agenda is anything but altruistic and whose disposition is more racist than the Klan.

In the “New World Order” being imposed on us by self-interested, ethnocentric megalomaniacs, no man has the right to explore, investigate and come to his own conclusions about history — that is the sole responsibility of the tyrannical monarchs of the NWO, who tell us what and how to think; free thought be damned.

BM/AB

Screen Shot 2014-04-11 at 10.41.06 AM.png
Brandon Martinez is a freelance writer and journalist from Canada whose area of expertise is foreign policy, international affairs and 20th and 21st century history. His writing is focused on issues such as Zionism, Israel-Palestine, American and Canadian foreign policy, war, terrorism and deception in media and politics. Readers can contact him at martinezperspective@hotmail.com. More articles by Brandon Martinez

Source: email

NSA and Jewish Bankers: Two Zionist Monsters

… by Jonas E. Alexis

nsa-augeGlenn Greenwald of The Guardian has conducted an interview with the Israeli newspaper Haaretz during which he declared that “The cardinal point is that part of the goal of the NSA is to completely eliminate privacy everywhere in the world. Its goal is to make every piece of human communication that is done by electronic means vulnerable to monitoring and surveillance − to collect, store and analyze every message transmitted by people via the telephone or the Internet.

“All the specific revelations are only examples of this: the fact that they collected the telephone records of all American citizens, that they detail every phone call made by every American citizen; the Prism and XKeyscore programs, which show how they can collect billions of pieces of communication every day and store and analyze the things you say, who you say them to, which websites you visit and so on.

Those are the means. The essence is the vast, sealed system of surveillance which is conducted in absolute secrecy.”[1]

Of course, the obvious question the inquiring mind would ask is this: “What’s the problem with that?” Greenwald responded,

“If those with power are capable of monitoring everything we do or say, that means we are very limited in what we can do or say against them. That’s the reason that every tyranny has always used surveillance as a tool to preserve its power.

“The second problem is that it’s a tool of intimidation. If the population knows that it is always being watched, people will have far less motivation to act, because they will feel vulnerable and threatened. The result is a kind of political paralysis among the public.

“The third and perhaps most important thing is that human behavior changes very fundamentally when there is no private space. People who know they are being observed behave in a manner that is far more restrained, narrow and fossilized. They become a lot less free, a lot less willing to test boundaries.

“Supervision and surveillance encourage conformity in people and eliminate something very essential in the human experience, in human nature: the freedom to do things when we know that no one is looking.

“The history of almost every country that exercises surveillance of its citizens is one of extreme abuse of that power. There is no consolation in the thought that the government promises to use that power exclusively against terrorists. Its use is almost always against political dissidents or against people who constitute a threat or challenge to the power apparatus. ”[2]

edward-snowden

Edward Snowden

We have seen in previous articles that the Israeli regime is one of the political forces behind the NSA. Edward Snowden indeed found himself drowning in the Zionist river of time but somehow swam against the currents and found a way out.

According to Snowden, people are floating in the Zionist river at their own perils. The end of that Zionist river is the end of American privacy. The end of that river is the end of privacy in virtually the entire world. Now Snowden is warning those who are still consciously or unconsciously floating in that river. He said:

“The surveillance of whole populations, rather than individuals, threatens to be the greatest human rights challenge of our time. A culture of secrecy has denied our societies the opportunity to determine the appropriate balance between the human right of privacy and the governmental interest in investigation.

“These are not decisions that should be made for a people, but only by the people after full, informed, and fearless debate. Yet public debate is not possible without public knowledge, and in my country, the cost for one in my position of returning public knowledge to public hands has been persecution and exile.

“If we are to enjoy such debates in the future, we cannot rely upon individual sacrifice. We must create better channels for people of conscience to inform not only trusted agents of government, but independent representatives of the public outside of government.”[3]

Once again, Snowden here is right in line with rational thought. What he is saying here is firmly compatible with what the Founding Fathers said and defended.

YOU ARE A TERRORIST IF YOU RESIST THE NSA

bankersThe NSA’s covert activity, however, gets worse almost every two weeks or so:

“Top secret US government documents…characterize even the most basic political and legal opposition to drone attacks as part of ‘propaganda campaigns’ from America’s ‘adversaries.’

“The entry is part of a top secret internal US government website, similar in appearance to the online Wikipedia site. According to a June interview with Snowden in Hong Kong, the only individuals empowered to write these entries are those ‘with top secret clearance and public key infrastructure certificates,’ special access cards enabling unique access to certain parts of NSA systems. He added that the entries are ‘peer reviewed’ and that every edit made is recorded by user…

“The NSA entry further claims that ‘manipulation of statistics’ over civilian deaths is a frequent propaganda tool of ‘adversaries,’ citing one study that concluded that roughly 9 out of 10 victims from drone strikes are civilians. To contrast such propaganda studies, the NSA entry cites a New America Foundation study concluding that ‘civilians make up about one-third of those killed.’

“The US has previously denounced drone opponents as US adversaries and even terrorist sympathizers. In 2011, the Bureau of Investigative Journalists published a study documenting numerous civilian deaths in Pakistan during the same time period for when John Brennan, then the chief White House counterterrorism adviser and now CIA Director, had falsely asserted there were no such deaths. Subsequent reports further proved the clear falsity of Brennan’s statements.”

“The US government has a long history of treating drone opponents as national security threats.”[4]

It has been reported recently that the NSA had a “U.S. assassination program,” where it seems to be that people who do not comply with what the NSA does would be exterminated.[5]

The evidence has not been fleshed out completely, but we do know that the NSA has gathered even social-networking data on Americans “to map behavior.”[6] As Gene Healy of the CATO Institute has put it, no one can hide from the NSA anymore.[7]

Here’s the rub: when NSA workers are not spying on Americans, they are spying on their spouses and girlfriends. The Associated Press recently reported:

“Confirming media reports that agency workers used surveillance technology in their private life—a practice jokingly known as ‘loveint’—the NSA’s inspector general, General George Ellard, released a letter to a US senator disclosing details of the romantic snooping.”[8]

In other words, you, the average American, pay your taxes, and that money goes to support people who will be using the NSA to spy on their husbands and wives and girlfriends. Listen to this:

“A National Security Agency employee was able to secretly intercept the phone calls of nine foreign women for six years without ever being detected by his managers, the agency’s internal watchdog has revealed.

“The unauthorised abuse of the NSA‘s surveillance tools only came to light after one of the women, who happened to be a US government employee, told a colleague that she suspected the man – with whom she was having a sexual relationship – was listening to her calls.

“The case is among 12 documented in a letter from the NSA’s inspector general to a leading member of Congress, who asked for a breakdown of cases in which the agency’s powerful surveillance apparatus was deliberately abused by staff. One relates to a member of the US military who, on the first day he gained access to the surveillance system, used it to spy on six email addresses belonging to former girlfriends.”[9]

But that means nothing to people like Diane Feinstein, who is fighting tooth and nail to preserve the NSA’s illegal activities against Americans.[10]

If counter-terrorism is not one of the biggest jokes ever told, then nothing is.

THE BANKERS ARE TOO FAT TO BE JAILED?

sachsWhat we are clearly seeing here is that if you are against anything that the Zionist regime has cooked up, then you are more than likely to be labeled a terrorist or something equally worse.

Whatever they do, you must accept it. In the Zionist world, free speech and free expression are simply relics of the past.

Whenever the Zionist mob is not in charge, they ask for diversity; but whenever they take control over the academia, they fine you if you ask for just an ounce of diversity.

If you question the “Holocaust” in Germany—like the 73-year old Bishop Williamson has done—you will be fined $2,431.[11] Then you have Zionist shills such as David Cameron who will increase funding for the Holocaust story to stay alive.[12]

Where will Cameron get the money? Well, he will loot the average guy in England. “Up to 146 million Europeans are at risk of falling into poverty by 2025…”[13]

There is more bad news. You, the average American, are going to send your sons and daughters to die not for freedom but for the Zionist regime. Citing again Andrew Bacevich:

“Few of the very rich send their sons or daughters to fight. Few of those leaving the military’s ranks find their way into the ranks of plutocracy.”[14]

And what do all those perpetual wars bring? Bacevich tells us: “civic decay, child poverty, homelessness, illegitimacy, and eating disorders,” where many people are now “overweight, overmedicated, and deeply in hock…”[15]

If you think that Bacevich is just pulling your leg, just read the article by the American Prospect last month entitled, “What’s Killing Poor White Women?”[16] And if you think the Zionist regime cares about what you think, just read about the current situation in America.

Virtually everyone knows that the debt ceiling in America is pathetic and that the country is already in its economic coffin. Obama summoned both parties at the White House precisely because they all know the country is already on the brink of economic collapse.[17]

matt-taibbi (1)

Matt Taibbi

Yet in the midst of all this, Netanyahu wants the U.S. to threaten Iran, obviously to produce more bloodshed in the Middle East.

The Zionist regime is currently looting pension funds,[18] and this activity has already sent shockwave across the nation.[19]  But you have to zip your lips. Business Insider has recently declared that “markets are crumbling all around the world as government shutdown gets close,”[20] but the Zionist regime is pushing more wars in the Middle East, including a bloody conflict with Iran. It has also been reported that nearly 5 million people are unemployed in Spain alone,[21] but we cannot focus on this problem because Israel is much more important.

Jewish companies such as Goldman Sachs and Wall Street are largely responsible for the economic collapse, but you, the average American, must use your own retirement money to bail them out.[22]

How do those companies use your precious money? Those Jewish bankers use them to fund drug lords and terrorism! Matt Taibbi of the Rolling Stone reported last February:

“For at least half a decade, the storied British colonial banking power helped to wash hundreds of millions of dollars for drug mobs, including Mexico’s Sinaloa drug cartel, suspected in tens of thousands of murders just in the past 10 years…

“The bank also moved money for organizations linked to Al Qaeda and Hezbollah, and for Russian gangsters…

“‘They violated every [expletive] law in the book,’ says Jack Blum, an attorney and former Senate investigator who headed a major bribery investigation against Lockheed in the 1970s that led to the passage of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. ‘They took every imaginable form of illegal and illicit business.’”[23]

And if you think that the war in Afghanistan has produced democracy, think again. In 1979, Afghanistan was producing only 250 tons of opium. By 2007, when the neo-Bolsheviks took over the country, at least “40,000 tons of illicit opiates have been stockpiled in Afghanistan, mostly to be marketed abroad.

“As of 2012, it was the world’s leading supplier of opium, with 74% of the global market, a figure that was expected to hit 90% as U.S. combat troops leave (and foreign aid flees). In other words, success in an endless war in that country has meant creating the world’s first true narco-state.”[24]
In short, we have reached an intolerable situation. We have the NSA virtually sucking the life out of virtually every American and much of the world by snooping on them, and we have Zombie Capitalist monsters such as Goldman Sachs, Wall Street, Bain Capital, JPMorgan Chase literally cheating the average American.

We have the Israeli regime currently destabilizing the West Bank by destroying Palestinian homes and building Jewish settlements in replacement.[25] Human Rights Watch recently declares,

“Israeli military forces should cease actions in a West Bank Bedouin community that were apparently intended to displace the residents without lawful justification.

“The military demolished all homes in the community on September 16, 2013, and blocked four attempts by humanitarian groups to provide shelters, with soldiers using force against residents, humanitarian workers, and foreign diplomats on September 20.

“Under international humanitarian law in effect in the occupied West Bank, the deliberate unlawful forced transfer of a population is a war crime.”[26]

JOURNALISTIC FRAUD

Seymour-Hersh-

Seymour Hersh

Noted journalist Seymour Hersh has recently declared that serious journalism has been hijacked. The only way to get back to serious issues is, says Hersh, to “fire 90% of editors and promote ones you can’t control.”[27]

The New York Times, Hersh continues, “spends so much more time carrying water for Obama than I ever thought they would. Nothing’s been done about that story, it’s one big lie, not one word of it is true. It’s pathetic, they are more than obsequious, they are afraid to pick on this guy [Obama].”[28]

Good point. The New York Times has been sheltering their Zionist president for quite some times now. The New York Times has declared that terrorist activities have dropped because of the NSA.[29] Neoconservative magazines such as the Weekly Standard were already working on this case since last August.[30]

In other words, the NSA should continue its covert operation against Americans.

Yet to say that the NSA actually stops terrorist activities actually begs the question: who is supporting the Syrian rebels/terrorists now? Who is suspending both international law and the American Constitution to support terrorist regimes in the Middle East? Russia? China? Norway? Iceland? North Korea? Or maybe Cuba?

The answer is quite obvious: it is the neo-Bolshevik/Zionist regime in America and Israel that is supporting terrorism. The Washington Post has recently reported that the CIA is currently training the rebels/terrorists,[31] who themselves have more than likely used chemical weapons and put the blame on Assad.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has recently said,

“We read reports and hear from various sources, semi-official and trustworthy, that some official representatives of a number of the countries of the region surrounding Syria allegedly established contacts and meet regularly with leaders of Jabhat al-Nusra and other terrorist groups, and also that those radicals have some components of chemical weapons maybe found in Syria or maybe brought from somewhere, and not just on the Syrian territory, but also that chemical weapons components have been brought to Iraq and that provocations are being prepared there.”[32]

Second, the claim that the NSA has actually stopped at least 54 terrorist plots is misleading at best. Keith Alexander has admitted under oath that this is not the case.[33] And after months of denying that the NSA can actually use devices such as cell phones to snoop on Americans, Alexander finally admitted that there is more to the NSA than meets the eye and ear.[34]

POISONOUS SNAKE

In response to the article by the New York Times on the issue that the NSA has thwarted terrorist activities, one commentator declared, “So? What is your point? Letting an Orwellian police state spring up like a poisonous snake? I think not.”[35]

Precisely. Keith Alexander has recently reiterated his position that “it is in the nation’s best interest to put all the phone records into a lockbox that we can search when the nation needs it.”[36] And at this present moment the NSA is storing your online data for at least one year.[37]

Mark Landler of the New York Times has declared a few days ago that Obama has had a deeply “frustrating private correspondence with the leaders of Iran,”[38] leaving the impression that Washington has always wanted peaceful dialogue and has reached out to Iran.

The simple fact is that it is the opposite! Iran has always reached out to the U.S. Even after the 9/11 attack, Iran sent his deep sympathies to Bush and agreed to fight terrorism. But Bush, in his tyrannical mode, rejected Iran’s proposals.[39]

Moreover, Obama, in some instances, has tried to deal with Iran in a more respectful manner. But the Israeli regime has always tried to tell him what to say and what not to say. In other words, they got him handcuffed.[40]

Even before Rouhani called Obama recently, White House National Security Advisor Susan Rice “informed her Israeli counterpart Yaakov Amidror Friday of the planned telephone conversation U.S. President Barack Obama was to hold with Iranian President Hassan Rohani and then informed him of its contents after it had taken place.”[41]

The United States has to send Israel contents of a dialogue between Washington and Iran! That is power. Netanyahu responded by saying that the Iran deal is a trap.[42] Netanyahu declares,

“Just like North Korea before it, Iran professes to seemingly peaceful intentions; it talks the talk of nonproliferation while seeking to ease sanctions and buy more time for its nuclear program.”[43]

As soon as the two Zionist talking heads met in Washington, Netanyahu asked Obama to threaten Iran even more. And he did.[44] Netanyahu, in return, was pleased with Obama’s threatening manner.[45]

Netanyahu went even further to declare that Hourani is “a wolf in sheep’s clothing” who does have a “charm offensive.”[46] As Daniel Levy of European Council on Foreign Relations has put it,

“Netanyahu is signaling that there is no realistic deal that would be acceptable to Israel. For instance, a consensus exists among experts and Western officials that Iran’s right to enrich uranium — in a limited manner and under international supervision — for its civilian nuclear energy program will be a necessary part of any agreement. Netanyahu rejects this.”[47]

In all honesty, how does this man sleep at night with all his lies and deceptions under his pajamas? Israel does not even sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty, but the same regime is dictating that this or that nation should be sanctioned.

Moreover, the Zionist regime inexorably produced massive death in the Middle East, and it seems that every month they need more blood from the goyim for their bar-mitzvah rituals.

Just last month alone, 900 civilians were slaughtered in Iraq,[50] a country where the neo-Bolsheviks have already established their Jewish heaven on earth. Widespread torture and inhumane behavior continue to be the norm in Libya,[51] where the neo-Bolsheviks made their visit in 2011.

This year alone, 5,740 people have already lost their lives in that country.[52] Last July, 1,000 people lost their lives in the same country. It is almost the same situation in Afghanistan, where thousands upon thousands of civilians have lost their lives. As a result, people are fleeing those countries by the thousands.[53] We see the same thing in Syria, where it has been reported that more than 115,000 people have lost their lives.[54] The war has also produced a form of “sexual jihad.”[55]

What is even more interesting is that the neo-Bolsheviks in America are currently denouncing Hasan Hourani for his cogent essay.[56]Jeffrey Goldberg for example propounds that Hourani “is  attempting to charm the pants off the United Nations, President Barack Obama, world Jewry and Charlie Rose”[57] by saying nice things but doing something else in secret. Brian Williams of NBC propounded the same thing.[58]

Golberg has five reasons as to why we should not take Hourani seriously, but none of those reasons is compatible with the Israeli nuclear warheads programs.

Golberg asserts that Rouhani cannot be taken seriously because Rouhani said 1) he “will not even talk about suspending uranium enrichment; 2) Hourani seems to be a moderate, but that’s what makes him so dangerous; 3)Rouhani wants to pursue nuclear weapons because, according to Goldberg, “it’s in the best interest of Iran’s rulers”; 4) Iran lies about its nuclear program when it declares that it is “un-islamic.”

Goldberg asserts, “mass murder of innocent people is also prohibited by Islam, but Khamenei’s government engages in this practice through its support for Hezbollah and Bashar al-Assad in Syria, among others. The regime also kills many people directly, of course, including peacefully protesting Iranians.”

And finally, Goldberg declares that “the supreme leader is, in fact, the nuclear program’s chief backer.”[59]

In short, The Zionist regime both in Israel and in America is doing the same thing that the Pharisees did in the first century: they are pushing the goyim to do all their dirty work and, as a result, absolve themselves from any responsibility.

After all, did Rabbi Ovadia Yosef declare that “Goyim were born only to serve us [Jews]”? Didn’t he say that “you must send missiles to them and annihilate them”?[60] Didn’t William Kristol say that Obama “is a born-again neocon”?[61] Didn’t Jewish historian Yuri Slezkine of the University of California declare that this is “The Jewish Century”?[62]

Hersh concludes,

“I would close down the news bureaus of the networks and let’s start all over, tabula rasa. The majors, NBCs, ABCs, they won’t like this – just do something different, do something that gets people mad at you, that’s what we’re supposed to be doing.”[63]

This is a sad story but Hersh could not flesh out the fact that the news media is largely a Jewish town.[64] I am sure that Hersh knows that Hollywood, which makes a mockery out of any sacrilegious things in movies such as Sweetwater Vengeance (they have yet to ridicule the Talmud in those movies), is also a Jewish empire.[65]

GOLDMAN SACHS AND THE REST OF US

Lloyd-BlankfeinHere’s an interesting thing: the oligarchs think that we have not given monstrous companies such as Goldman Sachs enough credit. Listen to this message by a self-proclaimed Ayn Rand devotee:

“Imagine the effect on our culture, particularly on the young, if the kind of fame and adulation bathing Lady Gaga attached to the more notable achievements of say, Warren Buffett.

Or if the moral praise showered on Mother Teresa went to someone like Lloyd Blankfein, who, in guiding Goldman Sachs toward billions in profits, has done infinitely more for mankind.

“(Since profit is the market value of the product minus the market value of factors used, profit represents the value created.) Instead, we live in a culture where Goldman Sachs is smeared as “a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity. . .[66]

Matt Taibbi, who is not even a Christian, was shocked: “What a world we live in, where Mother Teresa wins more moral praise than Lloyd Blankfein! Who can bear living in a society where such a thing is possible? Quel horreur![67]

Taibbi continued to say, “From tech stocks to high gas prices, Goldman Sachs has engineered every major market manipulation since the Great Depression — and they’re about to do it again.”[68] Taibbi is right.

Goldman Sachs, the Jewish banking and securities firm, came close to being shut down in 2010, but they cleared the issue by paying $550 million to settle their fraud case.[69] It is well known that Goldman Sachs was implicated in a sex trafficking scandal with Backpage.com—the biggest one in the United States.[70] Taibbi of Rolling Stone wrote in 2010:

“The first thing you need to know about Goldman Sachs is that it’s everywhere. The world’s most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money.”[71]

People who ought to be in jailedPeople who ought to be in jailed. So far, only Madoff got what he deserved.

Former Goldman Sachs vice president Greg Smith, a Jew himself, quit in 2012 after twelve years because he finally had the guts to say that the firm does not serve people but serves what the New Testament calls Mammon.

Smith declared that in order to get promoted in the company, you have to persuade “your clients to invest in the stocks or other products that we are trying to get rid of because they are not seen as having a lot of potential profit…Get your clients—some of whom are sophisticated, and some of whom aren’t—to trade whatever will bring the biggest profit to Goldman. Call me old-fashioned, but I don’t like selling my clients a product that is wrong for them.”[72]

Smith continues,

“I attend derivative sales meetings where not one single minute is spent asking questions about how we can help clients. It’s purely about how we can make the most possible money off of them.

“If you were an alien from Mars and sat in on one of these meetings, you would believe that a client’s success or progress was not part of the thought process at all. It makes me ill how callously people talk about ripping their clients off. Over the last 12 months I have seen five different managing directors refer to their own clients as ‘muppets,’ sometimes over internal e-mail.”[73]

Smith’s defection caused a lot of damage to the company, for right after his article appeared in the New York Times, Goldman Sachs’ shares dropped 3.4 percent, costing the company $2.15 billion.[74]

While this move prompted some to say that Smith committed career suicide,[75] he is a courageous man, and others have praised his honesty and boldness.[76] Yet Smith has not been the only whistleblower; accusations against Goldman Sachs were already made in 2011 when it was discovered that Goldman Sachs was “exploiting”clients.[77]

POLITICAL AWAKENING

Elizabeth O'BagyElizabeth O’Bagy>>>>>

But despite the Zionist political power over us, Americans are waking up and beginning to see that they have been lied to.[78] In addition, more and more neoconservative think tanks are beginning to be exposed as hoaxes and propaganda machines. The Elizabeth O’Bagy story is a classic case in point.

The legendary O’Bagy, who served as an analyst for the neoconservative Institute for the Study of War (headed by Jewish neocon Kimberly Kagan) and who was a frequent guest in the Zionist media, kept telling the entire world that she was a Ph.D. student at Georgetown University.

There was one problem: Georgetown had no record of O’Bagy. Once the world knew that she was a joke, the Institute fired her. Here’s the kicker: O’Bagy has been hired by John McCain as a legislative assistant. McCain declared:

“Elizabeth is a talented researcher, and I have been very impressed by her knowledge and analysis in multiple briefings over the last year.”[79]

What probably brought O’Bagy to McCain’s attention was that she had close contacts with Syrian rebel/terrorist organizations and “her work became widely cited by high-profile figures, including Senator John McCain.

“In a lengthy Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing with Secretary of State John Kerry, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, and General Martin Dempsey, McCain cited ‘Dr. O’Bagy’ extensively, quoting her Wall Street Journal op-ed, in which she argued, ‘the war in Syria is not being waged entirely or even predominately by dangerous Islamists and al-Qaida die-hards.’

“Indeed, the moderate nature of the Syrian rebels is a trope of O’Bagy’s reports for ISW just as it has been in McCain’s calls on the White House to arm the Syrian rebels. It is said that O’Bagy even orchestrated McCain’s trip to Syria to visit rebel commanders.”[80]

John McCain<<<John McCain

As Ryan Evans of the National Interest rightly puts it,

“Still, we have to give Senator McCain some credit for his consistency. For a few years now, his view of the world has been largely fictional. At least he now employs an effective specialist in foreign-policy fictions.”[81]

Evans is right. In response to McCain’s article on Putin, Russian politician Dmitry Peskov declared that McCain’s piece is “not intelligent.” He continued to say that

“McCain presents himself as a pro-Russian politician, because he is supposed to support the interests of the people against the oppressing authorities.

“This point is so naïve, and it’s so something from the Cold War propaganda arsenal, that it’s even difficult to explain, why the senator of the USA has such primitive thoughts.”[82]

Glenn Greenwald would probably call that “herd behavior.”[83]

McCain is wrapped around “primitive thoughts” because the neo-Bolshevik/Zionist/neoconservative dream is primitive in its ideological and political form. Those “primitive thoughts” want to drag the world to the Zionist guillotine where millions upon millions will be screaming for their lives like slaughtered chickens.

Perhaps it is time to put those Zionists out of jobs. Perhaps it is time to put them on trial for their crimes against humanity. Let the trial begin!


[1] Quoted in Noam Sheizaf, “Glenn Greenwald to Haaretz: Why Whistleblower Snowden Came to Me,” Haaretz, September 26, 2013.

[2] Ibid.

[4] Glenn Greenwald, “UK Detention of Reprieve Activist Consistent with NSA’s View of Drone Opponents as ‘Threats’ and ‘Adversaries,’” Guardian, September 25, 2013.

[6] James Risen, “N.S.A. Gathers Data on Social Connections of U.S. Citizens,” NY Times, September 28, 2013; David Storey, “The NSA Is Gathering Social-Networking Data on Americans to Map Behavior,” Business Insider, September 28, 2013.

[7] Gene Healy, “‘No Place to Hide’ from NSA, Then or Now,” CATO Institute, September 30, 2013.

[9] Paul Lewis, “NSA Employee Spied on Nine Women Without Detection, Internal File Shows,” Guardian, September 27, 2013.

[10] Charlie Savage, “Senators Push to Preserve N.S.A. Phone Surveillance, NY Times, September 26, 2013.

[12] Alice Philipson, “David Cameron: We Must Preserve the Memory of the Holocaust,” The Telegraph, September 17, 2013.

[13] “Up to 146 Million Risk Poverty if EU’s Austerity Drags On,” European Union Times, September 24, 2013.

[14] Andrew Bacevich, Breach of Trust: How Americans Failed Their Soldiers and Their Country (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2013), 43.

[15] Ibid., 41.

[16] Monica Potts, “What’s Killing Poor White Women?,” American Prospect, September 3, 2013.

[17] Jackie Calmes and Jonathan Weisman, “Obama Summons Congressional Leaders to White House,” NY Times, October 2, 2013.

[18] Matt Taibbi, “Looting the Pension Funds,” Rolling Stone, September 26, 2013.

[19] Dave Bernard, “Why Retirement Should Scare You,” U.S. News and World Report, September 27, 2013.

[20] Joe Weisenthal, “Markets Are Crumbing All Around The World as Government Shutdown Gets Close,” Business Insider, September 30, 2013; “This Latest European Economic Data Doesn’t Look So Good,” Business Insider, October 1, 2013.

[21] “Nearly 5 Million People Unemployed in Spain,” European Union Times, October 2, 2013.

[22] Taibbi, “Looting the Pension Funds,” Rolling Stone, September 26, 2013.

[23] Matt Taibbi, “Gangster Bankers: Too Big to Jail,” Rolling Stone, February 14, 2013.

[24] Ann Jones and Tom Engelhardt, “The Forgotten War,” Antiwar.com, October 2, 2013.

[26] “Israel: New Unlawful West Bank Demolitions,” Humans Right Watch, September 26, 2013.

[27] “Seymour Hersh on Obama, NSA and the ‘Pathetic’ American Media,” Guardian, September 27, 2013.

[28] Ibid.

[29] Eric Schmitt and Michael S. Schmidt, “Qaeda Plot Leak Has Undermined U.S. Intelligence,” NY Times, September 29, 2013.

[30] Stephen F. Hayes, “Leak of Zawahiri Intercepts Damages U.S. Security,” Weekly Standard, August 5, 2013.

[31] Greg Miller, “CIA Ramping Up Covert Training Program for Moderate Syrian Rebels,” Washington Post, October 2, 2013.

[33] Shaun Waterman, “NSA Chief’s Admission of Misleading Numbers Adds to Obama Administration Blunders,” Washington Times, October 2, 2013.

[34] Paul Lewis, “NSA Chief Admits Agency Tracked US Cell Phone Locations in Secret Tests,” Guardian, October 2, 2013.

[35] chmidt, “Qaeda Plot Leak Has Undermined U.S. Intelligence,” NY Times, September 29, 2013.

[36] Quoted in Paige Lavender, “Keith Alexander: In Best Interest of U.S. to ‘Put All the Phone Records’ into a Searchable  ‘Lockbox,’” Huffington Post, September 26, 2013.

[37] James Ball, “NSA Stores metadata of Millions of Web Users for Up to a Year, Secret Files Show,” Guardian, September 30, 2013.

[38] Ramzy Baroud, New Times Fiction: On Obama’s Letter to Rouhani,” Antiwar.com, September 25, 2013.

[39] See for example Trita Parsi, Treacherous Alliance: The Secret Dealings of Israel, Iran, and the United States (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007).

[40] See again Trita Parsi, A Single Roll of Dice: Obama’s Diplomacy with Iran (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011).

[41] Barak Ravid, “Israel Was Informed of Obama-Rohani Call in Advance, Briefed After,” Haaretz, September 28, 2013.

[42] Mark Landler, “Netanyahu Is Said to View Iran Deal as a Possible Trap,” NY Times, September 22, 2013.

[43] Ibid.

[44] “Transcript of Remarks Made by Obama and Netanyahu after Bilateral Meeting,” Haaretz, September 30, 2013.

[46] Quoted in Edith M. Lederer, “Netanyahu: Israel Won’t Let Iran Get Nuclear Arms,” The State (South Carolina), October 1, 2013.

[47] Daniel Levy, “Maximum Bibi,” Foreign Policy, September 27, 2013.

[48] Toby Sterling, “Israel’s President Peres: All Options Open on Iran,” Huffington Post, September 30, 2013.

[50] “Iraq Violence Kills nearly 900 in September, Gunmen Storm Police Station,” Chicago Tribune, October 1, 2013.

[52] “Iraq Violence Kills nearly 900 in September, Gunmen Storm Police Station,” Chicago Tribune, October 1, 2013.

[53] Jones and Engelhardt, “The Forgotten War,” Antiwar.com, October 2, 2013.

[55] “‘Sexual Jihad’ in Syria Cause Rise in Pregnancy Among Tunisian Women, Lawmaker Says,” Huffington Post, September 21, 2013.

[57] Jeffrey Goldberg, “Five Reasons Not to Trust Iran on Nukes,” Bloomberg, September 24, 2013.

[58] Glenn Greenwald, “Brian Williams’ Iran Propaganda,” Guardian, September 29, 2013.

[59] Goldberg, “Five Reasons Not to Trust Iran on Nukes,” Bloomberg, September 24, 2013

[60] Quoted in Paul R. Pillar, “A Culture of Hatred in Israel,” National Interest, August 21, 2012.

[62] Yuri Slezkine, The Jewish Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004).

[63] “Seymour Hersh on Obama, NSA and the ‘Pathetic’ American Media,” Guardian, September 27, 2013.

[64] See for example “Jews DO Control the Media,” Times of Israel, July 1, 2012; Joel Stein, “How Jewish Is Hollywood?,” LA Times, December 19, 2008; http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=194.

[65] See for example Neal Gabler, An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood (New York: Anchor Books, 1989).

[66] Quoted in Matt Taibbi, “Forbes Calls Goldman CEO Holier Than Mother Teresa,” Rolling Stone, September 20, 2013.

[67] Ibid.

[68] Matt Taibbi, “The Great American Bubble Machine,” Rolling Stone, July 9, 2009.

[69] Sewell Chan and Louise Story, “Goldman Pays $550 Million to Settle Fraud Case,” NY Times, July 15, 2010; Zachary A. Goldfarb, “Goldman Sachs to Pay Record Settlement in Fraud Suit, Change Business Practices,” Washington Post, July 16, 2010.

[70] Nicholas D. Kristof, “Financiers and Sex Trafficking,” NY Times, March 31, 2012; “Goldman Sachs Sex Trafficking Controversy: Company Sells Stake In Village Voice Media,” Huffington Post, April 1, 2012.

[71] Matt Taibbi, “The Great American Bubble Machine,” Rolling Stone, April 5, 2010.

[72] Greg Smith, “Why I Am Leaving Goldman Sachs,” NY Times, March 14, 2012.

[73] Ibid.

[74] Bhaskar Prasad, “Goldman Sachs Loses $2.15 Billion of Its Market Value,” International Business Times, March 15, 2012.

[75] Susan Adams, “Did Greg Smith Commit Career Sucide?,” Forbes, March 15, 2012.

[76] “Moral Bankruptcy on Wall Street,” National Interest, March 14, 2012; Matt Taibbi, “On Goldman Executive Greg Smith’s Brave Departure,” Rolling Stones, March 14, 2012; Larry Elliott, “Why Greg Smith Was Right about Goldman Sachs,” Guardian, March 15, 2012.

[77] Goldman Sachs Accused of Fooling in Scathing Senate Report,” Guardian, April 14, 2011; Dominic Rushe, “Goldman Sachs Accused of Misleading U.S. Congress in Damning Report,” Guardian, April 14, 2012.

[78] “Poll: Americans Have Negative View of Obama on Syria, Iran,” CBS News, September 24, 2013.

[79] Gordon Lubold, “Exclusive: McCain Hires Controversial Syria Analyst Elizabeth O’Bagy,” Foreign Policy, September 27, 2013.

[80] Ryan Evans, “Failing Upward: Elizabeth O’Bagy’s New Gig with McCain,” National Interest, September 27, 2013.

[81] Ibid.

[82] Quoted in “Russia Reacts to McCain’s Column: ‘Why Senator’s Thoughts Are So Primitive?,’” European Union Times, September 20, 2013.

[83] Glenn Greenwald, “Reddit Q-and-A on NSA Reporting,” Guardian, October 1, 2013.

Source: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/10/03/nsa-and-jewish-bankers-two-zionist-monsters/

The Perverse and Dark Side of Christian Zionism (Part I)

“I don’t believe that the Jewish State and Modern Zionism would have been possible without Christian Zionism. I think that the many Christian supporters of the rebirth of the Jewish State and the ingathering of the Jewish people in the 19th century made possible the rise of…modern Jewish Zionism.”—Benjamin Netanyahu[1]

            …by Jonas E. Alexis

Tim Lahaye and Jerry Jenkins

Benjamin Netanyahu, the man who has been a pathological liar with respect to Iran’s nuclear program, was telling the truth here.

By the middle of the 19th century, the birth of Dispensational Premillennialism made Zionism ideologically possible and acceptable among mainline Protestants.

Tim LaHaye, Jerry Jenkins and Hal Lindsey did not invent that system. As we shall see in the series, it has been around for at least one hundred years,[2] and date-setters with their failed predictions have always found fresh audiences to propagate the system as well.

There is also a lot of money to be made. Historian Paul Boyer has noted that by 1979, apocalyptic books had become a lucrative industry.[3]

Tim LaHaye has been known to trade his Christian value for the almighty dollar. He sued a Canadian Christian film company, but the federal judge threw the case out of court.

LaHaye also hired people like Michael Ovitz, who worked for celebrities like Michael Douglas, Tom Cruise, Kevin Cosner, Madonna, Barbra Streisand, Sylvester Stallone, and Steven Seagal, in order to get a forty-five million dollar deal with one of New York’s major publishing houses, Bantam Books.[4] Born into a Jewish family, Ovitz was former president of Walt Disney from 1995 until 1997.[5]

LaHaye got into trouble in the 1980s because it was reported that he received $10,000 from Bo Hi Pak, a sort of protégé of the late Korean-born religious leader Sun Myung Moon.[6] Moon was widely known in the Protestant evangelical world to be a cult leader.[7]

LaHaye disappointed mainline Protestant evangelicals by getting funds from Moon’s organization. Later, LaHaye accepted the invitation of being on the board of directors of Moon’s group, Christian Voice. Moon also had other branches, and LaHaye was happy to join in. Beverly, LaHaye’s wife, “spoke at a Moon event in Washington, D.C., as recently as 1996.”[8]

By 2002, the marriage between the secular and the sacred for the almighty dollar was two sides of the same coin with respect to Jewish ideology. Many big secular companies tried for years to get their hands on big-time Christian booksellers, and sometimes those secular publishers refuse to publish the big ones only when it comes to the conversion of the Jews.

Jewish spokesman for Random House, Stuart Applebaum, recalled that as a publicist for Bantam Books in the 1970’s,

“I did not want to work on a book that was advocating conversion of Jews to Christianity. I just personally didn’t want to work on a book like that.”[9]

Sun-Myung Moon

Applebaum’s brother, Irwyn, took a different view in 2002. He paid Tim LaHaye $45 million for a series of new novels. It was obvious, then, that LaHaye would return the favor in a positive light.

LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins have a rabbi declaring in Glorious Appearing, “Jesus will judge you Gentiles on how you have treated His chosen people. Those who honored the Jews are the sheep, and those who did not are the goats.”[10]

This sheep-and-goats illustration is taken from Matthew 25 in the New Testament, and the passage does not even mention Jews. It is talking about those who obeyed Christ’s commandments and those who do not. For ideological and lucrative purposes, LaHaye and Jenkins have turned the passage into something that it is not and in the process have desperately and foolishly made it compatible with Christian Zionism.

What we are progressively seeing here is that people like LaHaye and Jenkins have been bought with a price in order to say these kinds of things. Even the New York Times noticed that a large section of evangelical books were aiming at big bucks and in the process were not dealing with serious issues, but with “vernacular psychotherapy.”[11]

By 1988, Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, which owns big-time publishers such as HarperCollins and HarperOne, bought Zondervan, the Christian publisher. By 2011, the same company had also bought Thomas Nelson “for an undisclosed sum.”[12] In 2006, Thomas Nelson’s music business was also bought for $473 million, and now has Jane Friedman as its CEO.[13]

Rupert Murdoch worked closely with Israelis to destroy rival competitors,[14] and we know that Murdoch’s company has been involved in hacking as well,[15] although the Murdoch family denied they were aware of the illegal activity.[16]

rupert-murdoch

Rupert Murdoch

Just two days after Murdoch’s son James resigned as chairman of Sky News, the company admitted that they were involved in hacking into emails. The company admitted that the hacking was illegal, but said it was authorized by its executives,[17] which leads one to conclude that the executives—including Murdoch’s son, James—knew what they were doing.

This was not just one incident, but involved “phone hacking, e-mail hacking and paying bribes to public officials at two Murdoch-owned tabloids, The Sun and the now-defunct News of the World.”[18] Right after the public was made aware of these activities, protesters outside a London court put out signs which said “End the Murdoch Mafia.”[19]

It was later discovered that Rebekah Brooks, former head of the Murdoch newspaper and a close friend of Prime Minister David Cameron, was charged “with perverting the course of justice in the phone hacking scandal.” It was said that Brooks, who has been arrested twice for the same charges, “tried to hide or destroy files and equipment”[20] in order to absolve herself and the company from illegal activities.

The political vectors, then, seem to be quite obvious: although David Cameron has criticized Israel and called the Gaza strip a “prison camp,” his Jewish associates seem to have convinced him to take a different view. The Economist reported:

“The other Mr Cameron is Israel’s loyal friend. That version was on display on March 2nd, when the prime minister spoke to the Community Security Trust, a British Jewish group. He said his ‘belief in Israel’ was ‘indestructible’; discussing Israel’s security needs, Mr Cameron veered away from the European consensus towards the sort of robust view more typically heard in Washington, DC. He said Israel was ‘within its rights to search vessels bringing cargo into Gaza.’”[21]

Rebekah Brooks

Rebekah Brooks

Brooks, along with another Murdoch associate named Andy Coulson, was to be charged with paying $160,000 in bribes to public officials.[22] Yet even after all this, Brooks was found “not guilty.”[23] Right after she resigned from her hacking job, Brooks got a whopping $17.5 million exit package.[24]

In other words, it is very hard for some Zionists to spend some time in jail. And if they did actually go to jail, the neo-Bolsheviks will try very hard to get them out. Hosni Mubarak for example has already been released from his jail cell.[25]

Mubarak was a Zionist shill as soon as he ascended to the dictatorial throne and even liquidated opposing parties. During his reign, people were held captive without trials, torture places were built, and opposing views simply had no chance.[26] During the 2011 Egyptian uprising, the Mubarak regime tortured multiplied hundreds of people across the country.

In addition, “More than 1,000 people, including many prisoners, are said to have gone missing during the 18 days of the revolt. Scores turned up in Egypt’s morgues, shot or bearing signs of torture. Many have simply disappeared, leaving behind desperate families who hope, at best, that their loved ones are serving prison sentences that the government does not acknowledge” [27]

The Associated Press reported last year:

“Under Mubarak, tens of thousands of political prisoners were detained under emergency laws that expired last week after 31 years in force.”[28] An Egyptian rights group declared,

“Torture is the official state policy and not only the responsibility of an officer here or there. The same torture practices were repeatedly used in detention centres… including ‘beatings, flogging, burning with lit cigarette butts, rape threats, covering eyes, stripping the detainees naked… Sexual abuse and rape were common, particularly in fighting Islamists such as the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood,’”[29]

During those dark times, Susan Fayyad, director for the Nadim Center for the Rehabilitation of Victims of Violence, declared,

“Torture in Egyptian police station is regular, systematic, and widespread. Every person who walks into a police station risks falling victim of torture.”[30]

And Both Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch admitted that torture was rampant under Mubarak.[31]

The Neo-Bolsheviks financially supported torture in Egypt

Mubarak-- just "chilling" in jail.

Mubarak– just “chilling” in jail.

Yet Newsweek reported that the Obama administration gave Egypt $1.5 billion in 2010.[32] The New York Times reported the same thing.[33] Why? Because the Mubarak regime “supports America’s pro-Israel policies, especially by helping Israel maintain its stranglehold on Gaza.”[34]

In other words, Mubarak was paid by the neo-Bolsheviks in America to do Zionism’s dirty work.

Mubarak himself was reported to have amassed somewhere between 40 to 70 billion dollars over a period of thirty years. Amaney Jamal of Princeton notes that “There was a lot of corruption in this regime and stifling of public resources for personal gain.”[35]

Mubarak also “had close relations” with Israeli Prime ministers “Yitzhak Rabin and Benjamin Netanyahu.”[36] After Mubarak eventually left his political dictatorship, Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli government even offered him political asylum.[37]

When the Egyptian people finally rose up to challenge the Mubarak regime in January 2111, an incident which led to a public demonstration,[38] Jewish historian David Cesarani declares:

“The outcome of a Tiananmen Square-style crackdown is desirable and is predictable.”[39]

Just in case you don’t remember what a Tiananmen crackdown actually is, it is a military crackdown where civilians and peaceful demonstrators can be brutally and severally beaten and clubbed to death. This was what happened in China in 1989 when the government massacred protestors.[40]

This actually shocked Brendan O’Neil of The Telegraph, England. “And there has been no outrage. No Twitter-storm, no blog-based apoplexy, no heated radio phone-ins,” wrote O’Neil.[41] Not only that, Matthew Taylor, a former advisor to Tony Blair, declares that Cesarani was “incredibly brave” and “in a way, I can see his argument.”[42]

Imagine a David Irving making such a remark on Jews or any other people, what would have happened to that person? Certainly O’Neil got a point when he said that those who are crying out for democracy in the Middle East, particularly the neoconservatives who pushed the war in Iraq, are not indeed looking for democracy  but are trying to implement their own ideology.[43]

The Definition of Chutzpah

Going back to Murdoch, who was one of his trusted advisors? It was none other than Joel Klein, Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, which also happens to be the largest public school system in the United States. Klein worked hand in hand with Murdoch’s company to incorporate a new system called Wireless Generation.

This “Wireless Generation” was supposedly seeking to implement education software into the system, which the majority of school teachers opposed. In 2011, New York State was going to strike a deal with Murdoch’s company, but it was rejected because the company was still under investigation. It is said that Murdoch and Klein “became close friends,” and as such they understood each other with respect to public schools in New York in particular.

When the news broke that Murdoch’s company was charged with hacking, it was Klein who “advised on handling the scandal, sitting behind Mr. Murdoch during his first testimony before a parliamentary panel in summer 2011 and spending hours in London helping Mr. Murdoch prepare for a second round of questions last month.”[44]

In return, Klein amassed $4.5 million in 2011 alone from Murdoch’s company. Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, who has been watching these events very closely, declared that the scandal was “the definition of chutzpah.”[45] Perhaps rightly so. But this “definition of chutzpah” has crept in the Christian Zionist movement as well.

LaHaye is hardly the only person to have been duped by this definition of chutzpah. Many big Christian publishers found out in the early 1980s that talking about Dispensational eschatology means big business, and a number of them were ready to cash in on the trend.

lindseyFor example, “In 1977, ABC acquired Word Books, a Waco evangelical house with a thriving prophecy list; in 1988, Harper and Row paid some $57 million for Zondervan, a major prophecy publisher.”[46]

Hal Lindsey’s Late Great Planet Earth (1970) sold more than 28 million copies, while movies of the same genre were sweeping the land. Apocalyptic books such as Destined for the Throne sold 650,000 copies.

John F. Walvoord’s Armageddon, Oil, and the Middle East Crises sold 750,000 copies.[47] Major Christian publishers rarely published non-Dispensational books largely because the market only accepts books that will sell well.[48]

Although many of the predictions in Walvoord’s book turned out to be false, the book still had a great impact on many evangelicals.[49] In the book, Walvoord argued that before the Armageddon countdown, “the Middle East must become the number one crisis in the world.”[50]

In a nutshell, the Christian Zionist movement would be happy if the Middle is in crisis, and some would be sad if the Middle East does not have crisis. What the Christian Zionist ends up saying indirectly is that it is a good when children are being blown up by drones, when civilians are being killed by the thousands, when heads are being chopped off by the Syrian rebels/terrorists.  This is what happened to one Dispensationalist when he finally woke up and realized that what he was taught by Dispensationalists simply was wrong.

“I can remember coming down the mountain from L’Abri [Francis Schaeffer’s school] and expecting the stock market to cave in, a priestly elite to take over American government, and enemies to poison the drinking water. I was almost disappointed when these things did not happen.”[51]

As we shall see in the following articles, Christian Zionism or Dispensatioal Premillenialism cannot be understood without a thorough historical understanding of the Judaizing movement which got its jumpstart in the fifteenth century, culminating in the formation of the nation of Israel, and then dominating mainline evangelicals.

In the process, many mainline evangelicals literally have no clue of what is really taking place here. Others deliberately have signed pacts with the “Synagogue of Satan” for political and monetary purposes. John Hagee and Jerry Falwell are classic examples.

Christian Persecutions in Israel

Serious Christians have never been treated well in Israel. I have pointed out in an article that once a Jew in America becomes a non-Zionist Christian, he will be denied Israeli citizenship in Israel—even if his ancestors died in the Holocaust—yet any other Jew can get citizenship with no problem. Most evangelicals who have been duped by the Zionist ideology are not aware of this.

Ideologue Michael Oren, an Israeli ambassador to the United States, portrays Israel in a different light. He said:

“Christians are prominent in all aspects of Israeli life, serving in the Knesset, the Foreign Ministry and on the Supreme Court…Israeli Arab Christians are on average more affluent than Israeli Jews and better-educated, even scoring higher on their SATs.”[52]

This has not been the experience of Fida Jirvis, a Palestinian Christian, nor has it been the experience of many non-Zionist Christian groups.[53] For example, Roy Tov used to serve at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel and wrote a book about the ideology of the Zionist regime. For that, “the Mossad targeted him for assassination.”

Tov declares that it is hard for an outsider to believe that “even the lives of secular Jews in Israel are regulated by Pharisaic rabbis. Israel lacks a constitution or proper secular legislation.”[54] One of Tov’s biggest mistakes was that he converted to Christianity, which to him “poses a singular threat to Jewish leadership.”[55]

Judaism, Tov continues, is about “an ethnic salvation” of the Jews, while Christianity is universal, which is another way of saying that it deals with the “salvation or redemption of the human soul”[56] everywhere. It is no coincidence, Tov says, that “Jesus was considered an enemy from the beginning. His teachings and New Testament were banned.”[57] During his school days,

Jesus and His period were scarcely mentioned in Israeli history classes. Instead, greater emphasis was placed on deviant Christians who moved away from His teachings and committed atrocities. The Spanish Inquisition was a central topic; the tortures were studied in excruciating detail. In that way, few of us would feel inclined to learn more about Christianity and the priests would keep their positions and the huge material and political benefits accompanying them. We were encouraged to fear Christianity.”[58]

This is the true story of serious Christians in Israel. Both the neocons and Israeli officials have deliberately failed to tell the American people that they use deceptions to seduce mainline evangelicals. The official motto of the Mossad is, “Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Make War,” and this official motto “is deeply related to the modern word for ‘terrorism.’”[59]

Yet when 60 Minutes tried to broadcast the story of Israel’s mistreatment of Palestinian Christians,[60] Michael Oren told the network to kill the story before it aired, something that actually shocked the network![61] When they ran it anyway, Ilan Troen of Brandeis University faulted Bob Simon of 60 Minutes for being “malicious” for presenting the broadcast.[62]

Mark Tooley of the Weekly Standard also faulted the network for portraying Israel as an anti-Christian nation and argued that the presentation was unfair.[63] Jonathan S. Tobin of Commentary called the broadcast “preposterous.”[64]

Why the outcry? Because Israeli officials and the neoconservative hawks do not want to give evangelical Christians the impression that Israel does not really support Christians.[65] Evangelical Christians have been duped by Israel’s deception for decades, and those officials want to keep it that way. One official declared,

“The relationship between Israel and the Christian world is our strategic interest, and when we received several months ago information about this report and that it was planned for broadcast without any reaction by Israeli officials, Ambassador Oren did what a diplomat is supposed to do to prevent serious damage.”[66]

Bob Simon rightly pointed out,

“For Israel, there could be serious economic consequences. According to Israeli government figures, tourism is a multi-billion dollar business there. Most tourists are Christian. Many of them are American. That’s one reason why Israelis are very sensitive about their image in the United States.”[67]

It is not just economic consequences that Israeli officials fear, but that someday Christian Zionists will discover that they have been lied to for decades.

Within days, Christians United for Israel, spearheaded by John Hagee, sent letters to 60 Minutes asking for an apology for the broadcast. At least 22,000 supporters joined in.[68]

When Christians are being persecuted by the Israelis, this should be ignored and should not be mentioned in not one of many neoconservative propaganda magazines such as the Weekly Standard, Commentary, FrontPage, National Review, etc. Recently, the Daily Star in Lebanon reported,

“Unknown assailants threw a Molotov cocktail at a Roman Catholic monastery in Israel and scrawled racist graffiti on its walls, a police spokeswoman said Wednesday, in a suspected hate crime. Hebrew graffiti was also scrawled on the monastery walls, reading ‘Gentiles perish’ and ‘revenge.’

“In past years, Christian sites in Israel have been targets of hate crimes by suspected Jewish extremists. These incidents come in addition to attacks against mosques, which have been linked to the ‘price tag’ campaign of Israeli extremists opposed to state moves to dismantle unauthorized settler outposts.”[69]

Neoconservative authors such as Robert Spencer and Raymond Ibrahim would not mention this any time soon.

In a nutshell, Israel, “the problem child,” will never be satisfied until the entire Western world (including Christian Zionism) is reduced to abject servitude.

You give “the problem child” $3 billion this year, the “problem child” will ask for more.[70] In the process, America, as one Russian television has put it, has become “The United States of Israel.”[71]

William Kristol and Winston Churchill Face Off

Bill Kristol

Bill Kristol

Willim Kristol, one of the political and intellectual clowns of the neoconservative movement, has recently quoted Winston Churchill to this effect:

“Force, or perhaps force and bribery, are the only things that will be respected.  It is very sad, but we had all better recognize it.  At present our friendship is not valued, and our enmity is not feared.”[72]

The simple fact is that Kristol could not quote Churchill fully and extensively because Churchill would literally destroy his Jewish/neo-Bolshevik interpretation of the Middle East and history.

Kristol will never tell his readers that it was Churchill who wrote the devastating essay “Zionism versus Bolshevism,” in which he unequivocally declared that Jewish revolutionaries will “shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible.[73]

Christianity has rendered possible the foundation of the West, logos in all its manifestations, and the brotherhood for all people’s and salvation for all mankind. Jewish revolutionaries have and will attempt to overthrow all this and replace it with a Jewish bloodbath in the Middle East and in much of the West.

When the Jewish bloodbath was over in the Soviet Union, it moved to Asia, where it literally exterminated 45 million people in just one country in less than six years.[74] And then we are recently witnessing almost the same phenomena in the Middle East, though on a gradual scale. Churchill put it best:

“From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.

“It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century.”[75]

In an attack to Bolshevism, Churchill declared that “a negative resistance to Bolshevism in any field is not enough. Positive and practicable alternatives are needed in the moral as well as in the social sphere.”[76]

We are facing the same situation with the neoconservative/neo-Bolshevik/Zionist ideology in America. Christian Zionists need to stop playing games and break their unconditional alliance with Israel. This will be one of the great steps in defeating Zionism.

Moreover, defeating Zionism/neo-Bolshevism in all its manifestations is not anti-Semitism—it is defeating evil. People of all background are welcome in this fight. I will never cease to cite and admire Alexander Solzhenitsyn:

“And thus, overcoming our temerity, let each man choose: will he remain a witting servant of the lies, or has the time come for him to stand straight as an honest man, worthy of the respect of his children and contemporaries?”[77]


[2] See detailed studies on these issues, Amy Johnson Frykhom, Rapture Culture: Left Behind and Evangelical America (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004); Paul Boyer, When Time Shall Be No More: Prophecy Belief in Modern American Culture (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994); Victoria Clark, Allies for Armageddon: The Rise of Christian Zionism (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007); Robert C. Fuller, Naming the Antichrist: The History of an American Obsession (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995); Daniel Wojcik, The End of the World as We Know It: Faith, Fatalism, and Apocalypse in America (New York: New York University Press, 1997); Norman Cohn, The Pursuit of the Millennium: Revolutionary Millenarians and Mystical Anarchists of the Middle Ages (New York: Oxford University Press, 1970); Stephen D. O’Leary, Arguing the Apocalypse: A Theory of Millennial Rhetoric (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994); Eugene Weber, Apocalypses: Prophecies, Cults, and Millennial Beliefs through the Ages (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999); Kenneth G. C. Newport, Apocalypse and Millennium: Studies in Biblical Eisegesis (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000); Ruth Alden Doan, The Miller Heresy, Millennialism, and American Culture (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1987); Ruth H. Bloch, Visionary Republic: Millennial Themes in American Thought, 1756-1800 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007); James West Davidson, The Logic of Millennial Thought: 18th Century England (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977); Timothy P. Weber, Living in the Shadow of the Second Coming: American Premillennialism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987); Michael Barkun, A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003).

[3] Boyer, When Time Shall Be No More, 11.

[4] See Timothy P. Weber, On the Road toArmageddon: How Evangelicals Became Israel’s Best Friend (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2004), 188-196.

[6] Barbara Forrest and Paul R. Gross, Creationism’s Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 272.

[7] See Walter Martin, The Kingdom of the Cults (Bloomington, MN: Bethany, 2003), chapter 13.

[8] Forrest and Gross, Creationism’s Trojan Horse, 272.

[9] David Kirkpatrick, “Evangelical Sales Are Converting Publishers,” NY Times, June 8, 2002.

[10] Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins, GloriousAppearing: The End of Days (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale, 2004), 368.

[11] Ginia Bellafante, “Single Evangelical in Need of Advice? Books Have Plenty,” NY Times, July 19, 2004.

[12] Ted Olsen, “HarperCollins Buys Thomas Nelson, Will Market 50% of Christian Publishing Market,” Christianity Today, October 31, 2011; also Geert de Lombaerde, “News Corp. Unit Buying Thomas Nelson,” Free Republic, November 2, 2011; Andrew Edgecliffe-Johnson, Gerrit Wiesman, and Robert Budden, “News Corp. in Bid for Penguin Books,” Financial Times, October 20, 2012.

[13] Olsen, “HarperCollins Buys Thomas Nelson,” Christianity Today.

[14] Neil Chenoweth, “Pay TV Piracy Hits News,” Australian Financial Review, March 28, 2012.

[15] “Murdoch Pie Thrower Reportedly Blogging from Prison,” CNN, August 16, 2011.

[16] Sarah Lyall, “Murdochs Deny that They Knew of Illegal Acts,” NY Times, July 19, 2011; John F. Burns and Alan Cowell, “James Murdoch Testifies Before Judicial Panel,” NY Times, April 24, 2012.

[17] Sarah Lyall, “Murdoch’s Sky News Channel Discloses Hacking of Emails,” NY Times, April 5, 2012.

[18] Ibid.

[19] Amy Chozick, “Scandal and Scrutiny Hem in Murdoch’s Empire,” NY Times, April 29, 2012.

[20] John F. Burns and Alan Cowell, “Top Murdoch Aide Is Charged in Hacking Case,” NY Times, May 15, 2012.

[21] “All the President’s Messengers,” The Economist, March 17, 2011.

[22] Alan Cowell and John F. Burns, “Former Murdoch Aids to Be Charged with Bribery,” NY Times, November 20, 2012.

[23] Georg Szalai, “Rebekah Brooks Pleads Not Guilty to All Phone-Hacking, Corruption Charges,” Hollywood Reporter, June 5, 2013.

[24] Georg Szalai, “Rebekah Brooks Got $17.5 Million News Corp. Exit Package,” Hollywood Reporter, December 12, 2012.

[25] Rod Nordland, “Mubarak Removed from Egyptian Prison,” NY Times, August 22, 2013.

[26] http://www.nbcnews.com/id/41285248/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/#.UhgO8xtQHAI; Jane Mayer, “The CIA’s Travel Agent,” New Yorker, October 30, 2006; Jack Shenker, “Egyptian Elections: Independent Fights for Hearts and Minds in ‘Fixed Ballot,’” Guardian, January 28, 2011.

[27] Evan Hill and Muhammad Mansour, “Egypt’s Army Took Part in Torture and killing During Revolution, Report Shows,” Guardian, April 10, 2013.

[29] Ibid.

[30] Quoted in Erin Banco, “Two Years After Mubarak, His Prison Torture Apparatus Still Wounds Egypt,” Christian Science Monitor, October 13, 2012.

[31] Ibid; see also Nayla Razzouk, “Torture Under Mubarak Regime Fueled Protests, Rights Group Says,” Bloomberg, February 11, 2011; Robert Tait, “28 Hours in the Dark Heart of Egypt’s Torture Machine,” Guardian, February 9, 2013.

[32] Stephen Kinzer, “Egypt Protests Show American Foreign-Policy Folly,” Newsweek, January 28, 2011.

[33] Ethan Bronner, “Israel Shaken as Turbulence Rocks an Ally,” NY Times, January 30, 2011.

[34] Kinzer, “Egypt Protests Show American Foreign-Policy Folly.”

[35] Quoted in Phillip Inman, “Mubarak Family Fortune Could Reach $70 Billion, Expert Says,” Guardian, February 4, 2011.

[36] Aluf Benn, “Without Egypt, Israel will be Left with no Friends and Mideast,” Haaretz, January 29, 2011.

[37] “MK Ben Eliezer: Israel Offered Political Asylum to Mubarak,” Haaretz, August 3, 2011.

[39] Quoted in Brendan O’Neil, “The Egypt Protests Have Exposed the Hypocrisy of Mealy-mouthed Western Commentators,” The Telegraph, February 10, 2011.

[40] See for example Zhao Ziyang et al., Prisoner of the State: The Secret Journal of Premier Zhao Ziyang (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2010); for other similar studies, se also Ezra F. Vogel, Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011); Barry J. Naughton, The Chinese Economy: Transitions and Growth (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2006).

[41] O’Neil, “The Egypt Protests Have Exposed the Hypocrisy of Mealy-mouthed Western Commentators,” The Telegraph, February 10, 2011.

[42] Ibid.

[43] Ibid.

[44] Amy Chozick, “Steering Murdoch in Scandal, Klein Puts School Goals Aside,” NY Times, May 7, 2012.

[45] Ibid.

[46] Boyer, When Time Shall Be No More, 7.

[47] Ibid., 5-6.

[48] See Gary DeMar, Why the End of the World I Not in Your Future (Powder Springs, GA: American Vision, 2008).

[49] Ibid.

[50] John F. Walvoord, Armageddon, Oil and the Middle East Crisis (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1990), 27.

[51] See DeMar, Why the End of the World Is Not in Your Future, chapter 1.

[52] Michael Oren, “Israel and the Plight of Mideast Christians,” Wall Street Journal, March 9, 2012.

[53] Fida Jiryis, “The Myth of Israel’s Favorable Treatment of Palestinian Christians,” Mondoweiss.net, March 15, 2012.

[54] “A Cup of Tea with Roy Tov—Author of The Cross of Bethlehem,” VeteransToday.com, May 13, 2012.

[55] Roy Tov, The Cross of Bethlehem: The Memoirs of a Refugee (Charleston, SC: Book Surge, 2009), 91.

[56] Ibid., 91.

[57] Ibid., 92.

[58] Ibid.

[59] Ibid., 98.

[60] “Christians of the Holy Land,” CBS News, April 22, 2012.

[61] Natasha Mozgovaya, “60 Minutes Chides Israeli Envoy for Interfering in Segment,” Haaretz, April 24, 2012.

[62] Ilan Troen, “Christians in an Out of the Holy Land,” Jerusalem Post, April 24, 2012.

[63] Mark Tooley, “60 Minutes Steers Christians Against Israel,” Weekly Standard, April 28, 2012.

[64] Jonathan S. Tobin, “Who’s Really Persecuting Christians?,” Commentary, May 18, 2012.

[65] Rebecca Shapiro, “60 Minutes Israel Story: Benjamin Netanyahu Reportedly Briefed On Envoy’s Attempt to Kill CBS Story,” Huffington Post, April 24, 2012.

[66] Ibid.

[67] Jack Mirkinson, “60 Minutes, Israeli Ambassador Clash Over Story About Arab Christians,” Huffington Post, April 24, 2012.

[68] “60 Minutes Slammed Over Segment on Christians in Israel,” Jewish Week, April 24, 2012.

[70] “Report: Israel Seeking More US Military Aid,” JewishPress.com, August 21, 2013.

[72] William Kristol, “Churchill Was Right,” Weekly Standard, August 21, 2013.

[73] Winston Churchill, “Zionism vs. Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People,” Sunday Illustrated Herald, February 20, 1920.

[74] See for example Frank Dikotter, Mao’s Great Famine: The History of China’s Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958-1962 (New York: Walker Publishing Company, 2010).

[75] Churchill, “Zionism vs. Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People,” Sunday Illustrated Herald, February 20, 1920.

[76] Ibid.

[77] Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Solzhenitsyn Reader (Wilmington: ISI Books, 2009), 558.

Related Posts:

Source: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/08/23/the-perverse-and-dark-side-of-christian-zionism-part-i/

Government Persecution, From Aaron Swartz to Bradley Manning


Aaron Swartz. Courtesy: Flickr user Sage Ross

“Prosecutors destroy a life.” That could be a headline in every newspaper every day in a land where the answer to every problem (and many nonproblems) is police and prisons. When 26-year-old Internet prodigy and freedom of information activist Aaron Swartz committed suicide on January 11, the tragedy was the direct result of US attorneys deciding to throw criminal charges at him for violating a website’s “terms of services” while accessing publicly subsidized academic research. Swartz entered the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s open campus, accessed its open network and downloaded a few million academic articles owned by the digital library JSTOR, whose database contains content belonging to hundreds of publishers. JSTOR and MIT now insist they would have been only too happy to drop the matter, but prosecutors pushed forward, throwing four felony charges at Swartz, who then faced a maximum sentence of thirty-five years in prison, along with fines of up to $1 million. Prosecutors shoveled on nine more felony counts in September, bringing the total to thirteen.

The Justice Department’s legal assault on Swartz is of a vindictive piece with the prosecution of others who have carried important information into the public realm. Front and center is 25-year-old Bradley Manning, the Iraq War enlistee accused of being WikiLeaks’s source in the military. The restricted foreign policy documents that Manning allegedly released don’t amount to even 1 percent of the 92 million items the government classified last year, but the young private faces life in prison at his court-martial in June for the charge, among twenty-one others, of “aiding the enemy.” Then there’s Jeremy Hammond, age 28, who in his freshman year at the University of Illinois hacked the computer science department’s home page, then told them how they could fix its problem. He got thrown out of school for that; now he’s in a federal prison facing thirty-nine years to life, charged with various hacks and leaks (all apparently led by an FBI informant) including the 5 million internal e-mails of Stratfor, a private security firm hired by corporations to surveil private citizens, among other activities.

Barack Obama once campaigned as a friend to whistleblowers. Yet his Justice Department has launched twice as many Espionage Act prosecutions against domestic leakers as all previous administrations combined. One defendant, former National Security Agency official Thomas Drake, resembles an older version of Swartz: a former math and chess prodigy, Drake saw wanton illegality in the NSA’s post-9/11 surveillance program. When his internal complaints went nowhere, he went to The Baltimore Sun. The case against Drake crumpled on contact with a courtroom, but it was enough to ruin his career and financial well-being. Drake pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor and now works at an Apple Store when he isn’t attending Bradley Manning’s court hearings.

Too often the cause of open information is dismissed as a geek fetish, a tedious hobby for the IT crowd. This is a grave error, as the high barriers around information are literally killing us. Larry Korb, former assistant secretary of defense, has told me he doesn’t think the Iraq War—endpoint of a debate starved of meaningful information, which has slaughtered hundreds of thousands—would have happened had unredacted intelligence reports been made more public.

Circulation of knowledge is a social justice issue, too. Dean Baker estimates that reforming the patent law regime for pharmaceuticals—currently a system that guarantees Big Pharma’s monopolies—would shrink annual spending on prescription drugs from $300 billion to $30 billion, a savings some five times the annual cost of Bush’s tax cut for the richest 2 percent. Meanwhile, grotesquely prolonged copyrights for literary and artistic properties are fencing off the cultural commons, a boot on the throat of a generation’s creative voice.

Prosecutors have cast activists like Swartz as cyber-terrorist Bond villains. In reality, they are more like earnest variations on Lisa Simpson. Swartz’s account of how he got involved with the fight to stop the SOPA/PIPA intellectual property bill in Congress reads like a Capra-esque rhapsody to American democracy. Manning, neck-deep in the worst foreign-policy disaster since Vietnam, hoped his leaks would lead to “worldwide discussion, debates, and reforms” because “without information, you cannot make informed decisions as a public.” Jeremy Hammond’s rhetoric admittedly tends to the extra-spicy, but many of his alleged misdeeds—revealing corporate spying on ordinary citizens—are a public service. Is getting the truth out really such a bad thing?

To be sure, the truth alone has never been enough to set anyone free. And truth, whether about foreign civilians killed or domestic surveillance programs, is very often the last thing people want. District attorneys know this. Perhaps the greatest tribute to the power of knowledge is the prosecutorial state’s panicked attempts to suppress it.

The notion that information should be easy to come by was not cooked up at the annual DefCon hacker conference. It was James Madison who wrote, “Popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps both.” In the year 2013, such an Enlightenment cliché should not be sounding radical. (It is only since the summer of 2011 that Washington finished declassifying material from the Madison administration—a lag measured in centuries.)

The death of Aaron Swartz has rallied a small counterattack against the know-nothing state: mild law professors are spitting nails about bullying prosecutors, and the US attorney overseeing the case, Carmen Ortiz, no longer has a bright future in Massachusetts politics. “Aaron’s Law,” a bill proposed by Representative Zoe Lofgren, would prune the overreaching Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and even right-wing Senator John Cornyn is asking whether the case against Swartz was retaliation for the activist’s assertive use of Freedom of Information Act requests.

These are good developments, but they are overshadowed by runaway overclassification, toothless whistleblower-protection laws and an intellectual property regime driven by greed alone. Ignorance enforced by police and prosecutors will not bring us security, wealth or justice.

William F. Baker writes that the FTC’s investigation of Google has skirted the issue of the search-engine giant’s ability to restrict readers’ access to news.

Source

“Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act.”

Today that saying defines many in the truth movement, and probably is George Orwell’s most quoted revelatory statement.

There is only one world leader today that dares to defy the Jewish establishment by speaking the truth, and he is the president and dictator of the nation that both the U.S. and Israel are hell-bent on annihilating: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Iran.

His speech on August 17 was in honor of Al-Quds Day.  Al-Quds Day was established by Ayatollah Khomeini in 1979 to support the Palestinian struggle and is marked every year on the last Friday of Ramadan.  Again he had some very harsh statements regarding the cruelty of Israel towards Palestinians and the West in general.

Here is an excerpt of some of those statements gathered from Y-net News:

“The very existence of the Zionist regime is an insult to humanity.”

“The western powers cannot tolerate criticism of the Zionist regime. They feel compelled to defend it.”

“It is dangerous if even 10% of the territory is given to the Zionists.”

“The Zionist regime is a malignant cancer, if even one cell remains on Palestinian land, the current situation will continue in the future,” the president said and warned: “Zionists want to spread.”

“Al-Quds Day is the day of unity among all human beings to remove the “Zionist black stain” from the human society,”

“Today, countering the Zionist entity and the fabricated Zionist regime safeguards rights of all human beings, defends human dignity and paves the way to save humankind from arrogance, poverty and misery,”

“Zionist presence on even one centimeter of Palestinian land was dangerous. That’s my personal understanding. Don’t blame me later, this is how I see things.”

Ahmadinejad also alluded to the recent changes political changes in Egypt and warned the Arab nations against joining with the west, “which has exchanged one mask for another and become their friend.”

“our enemies must not be forgotten and we cannot let them control the region.”

“western powers were “thirsty for bloodshed,” and they have managed to cause a conflict within the Islāmic world between Shiites and Sunnis.”

“for your own good, set the Zionists aside and focus on nations’ rights, seek recognition of your interests. You must know that a new spring will come if you do not heed my advice. Stop supporting the Zionist regime, they are useless to you.”

“You are interested in a new Middle East, so are we, a new Middle East will come into being but with the help of God, the new Middle East will have no memory of the presence of the Americans and Zionists.”

“Stop insulting the Iranian nation, you need to be friends of the Iranian people, it is for your own good.”

The last dictator and nation to rise up against the oppressive power of world Jewry was Adolf Hitler and Germany.  History although compromised vividly described the Jews’ inhumane retribution against the German people.  Germany and her people were crushed literally driven into the ground by humiliation, torture and death.

I firmly believe the middle eastern countries including Iran that have resisted the Jewish threat are the Jews’ only hindrance to accomplishing complete and total world domination.  Should Iran and her neighbors fall so shall the rest of the world.  It may happen without the other side firing one shot or Israel decides to engage in her favorite method for bringing the sheep under her control.

A shell fired by Israeli forces explodes over the northern Gaza Strip January 4, 2009. Israeli tanks and infantry battled Hamas fighters in the Gaza Strip on Sunday in a ground offensive launched after eight days of deadly air strikes failed to halt the Islamist group’s rocket attacks on Israel. REUTERS/Baz Ratner (GAZA)

This is the world created by Israel and eventually it will consume the entire planet.  It’s time to end Jewish-Zionist aggression for all time.

Whitewraithe~  

Former Marine Indefinitely Detained In Psychiatric Ward Over 9/11 Facebook Posts

(Photo : YouTube/Screenshot) US Marine Brandon Raub was detained by police for posting what may appear to be threatening messages on Facebook. The moments were caught on video and posted on YouTube.

Marine Locked In Mental Ward for Questioning 9/11

Former marine Brandon Raub was carted off by the Feds and locked in a psychiatric ward for his Facebook posts questioning the government’s version of 9/11.

Raub isn’t the first person who has suffered this fate.  Claire Swinney was also held in a psychiatric ward and called “delusional” for claiming government liability for 9/11.   Others have been committed for the same reason over the last decade.

Surely the Feds are right … that kind of talk is crazy, right?

Maybe.  But many of the 9/11 Commissioners themselves don’t buy what the government says about 9/11, they say that the government has covered up the state sponsorship of the 9/11 hijackers, and .

Indeed, while they obviously haven’t said that the government was involved, 9/11 Commissioners have said we need further investigation and that the American people should question 9/11.  Does that mean they should they be committed to the same psych ward which Mr. Raub and Ms. Swinney enjoyed?  Of course not.

Some people believe that 9/11 was wholly unforeseeable.  Others believe that government personnel were criminally negligent in letting 9/11 happen, and then obstructed justice to cover it up.  See this, this, this, this, and this.   Still others believe that rogue government personnel allowed 9/11 to happen, or even played a role in the attacks themselves.

Whatever one believes about 9/11, isn’t our society built on freedom of speech? And if someone has kooky theories, won’t the scientific method and free debate defeat the baseless theories? Isn’t that what modern society is all about?

Raub’s attorney – the head of the non-partisan civil rights law firm The Rutherford Institute – points out that Raub is being indefinitely detained, and says:

For government officials to not only arrest Brandon Raub for doing nothing more than exercising his First Amendment rights but to actually force him to undergo psychological evaluations and detain him against his will goes against every constitutional principle this country was founded upon. This should be a wake-up call to Americans that the police state is here.”

What Do Mental Health Professionals Say About Those Who Question 9/11?

Many sociologists and mental health professionals say that those who believe the official version without any questioning are the ones suffering from psychological defense mechanisms.

Sociologists say that fear of terrorism has made people blindly accept false justifications for war – including the false claim that Saddam had a hand in 9/11(when even the 9/11 Commission says he didn’t).

And the following mental health professionals say that questioning the government’s cut-and-dried version of 9/11 is the sane thing to do:

  • Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, as well as Radiology, at Duke University Medical Center D. Lawrence Burk, Jr., MD
  • Board of Governors Distinguished Service Professor of Psychology and Associate Dean of the Graduate School at Rutgers University Barry R. Komisaruk
  • Distinguished Professor in the Department of Mental Health Law and Policy, Professor of Medicine in the Department of Internal Medicine and Distinguished Professor of Global Health in the College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Michael D. Knox
  • Clinical Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey Laura Schafer
  • Professor Emeritus, Psychology and Neuroscience, Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Michael Gabriel
  • Former Chief Mental Health Coordinator and Director of Manpower Development and Training, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, and Lecturer in Psychology, Boston University Herbert Hoffman
  • Professor of Psychology, University of Chicago and Northwestern University Jack Sawyer
  • Professor Emeritus of Psychology at California Institute of Integral Studies Ralph Metzner
  • Professor Emeritus, Psychology, University of Marburg Gert Sommer
  • Professor of Psychology, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Ralph Hood
  • Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Jefferson Medical College. Former Major, U.S. Army Medical Corps, Vietnam Veteran 7 years service, Jon Bjornson, MD
  • Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from the University of Nebraska and licensed Psychologist Ronald Feintech

There are many other mental health professionals who agree.

Why Are Some Psychologists So Dogmatic?

Russian psychiatrists famously aided Stalin in applying fake insanity diagnoses to political dissenters.

Similarly, American apologists for the powers-that-be are eager to label anyone “taking a cynical stance toward politics, mistrusting authority, endorsing democratic practices, … and displaying an inquisitive, imaginative outlook” as worthy of a trip to the insane asylum. (Those traits may also get one labeled as a potential terrorist.)

But most mental health professionals who assume that those who question 9/11 are crazy are simply victims of the the “Martha Mitchell Effect”:

The process by which a psychiatrist, psychologist, or other mental health clinician mistakes the patient’s perception of real events as delusional and misdiagnoses accordingly.

The authors of a paper on this phenomenon (Bell, V., Halligan, P.W., Ellis, H.D. (2003) Beliefs About Delusions. The Psychologist, 6 (8), 418-422) conclude:

Sometimes, improbable reports are erroneously assumed to be symptoms of mental illness [due to a] failure or inability to verify whether the events have actually taken place, no matter how improbable intuitively they might appear to the busy clinician.

In other words, psychologists who haven’t taken the time to examine for themselves the claims of their patients will tend to label as delusional anything which they “intuitively” feel is improbable.

As such, psychologists and psychiatrists are just as prone to acting out their irrational prejudices as anyone else … unless they take the time to investigate and educate themselves.

Postscript:  We do not condone violence.  Virtually all those who question the government’s version of 9/11 are peaceful, non-violent folks.

Source

Related:
Ex-Marine Brandon Raub Detained for Anti-Government Messages on FaceBook; First Amendment Rights Potentially Violated, Says Civil Liberties Group

A former Marine was detained for psychiatric evaluation after posting several anti-government messages on Facebook. Police are not using the word “arrest” for the matter but “detained” as under state law in Virginia police can allow emergency and temporary psychiatric detention upon the recommendation of a mental health professional.

The Marine, named Brandon Raub, has been in custody after FBI, Secret Service, and Virginia’s Chesterfield County police questioned him last Thursday evening about Facebook posts of a pending revolution.

One of Raub’s message was, “Sharpen my axe; I’m here to sever heads.”

Raub has since been in the John Randolph Medical Center, and has not been charged with any crime.

The detainment of Raub has led to public outcry as people state it might have infringed on Raub’s First Amendment rights. Further complaints came from a YouTube video showing Raub being thrown to the ground by police.

The Rutherford Institute, a Virginia-based civil liberties group, has given Raub one of their attorneys for a hearing scheduled on Monday.

“For government officials to not only arrest Brandon Raub for doing nothing more than exercising his First Amendment rights but to actually force him to undergo psychological evaluations and detain him against his will goes against every constitutional principle this country was founded upon,” said the institute’s executive director John Whitehead.

According to CBS Richmond affiliate WTVR, Raub’s mother Cathleen Thomas said his son has no history of a mental illness.

“He never was violent or psychotic or anything like that,” said Cathleen Thomas to WTVR. “There were just conversations we had back and forth, very deep.”

Another of Raub’s postings was, “There is evil going on all around the world. The United States was meant to lead the charge against injustice, but through our example not our force. People do not respond to having liberty and freedom forced on them.”

“Our views are very strong because we are patriots,” Thomas added. “Our stance in this family is to question everything…when we lose the right to be able to stand up and say how we feel, no matter what it’s about, I think that we need to be very concerned. Because what it speaks to me is that they’re trying to shut people up. They’re trying to squelch the message.”

Raub served as a combat engineer sergeant in both Iraq and Afganistan.

Source

The False Flag Attack That Would Suspend 2012 Elections & Implement Martial Law

By Susanne Posel
- Occupy Corporatism

Kelly Keisling, Tennessee state Representative, is concerned that the Obama administration and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) are planning events that will lead to “martial law”.

The DHS are seeking to hire “role players” for TSA and Air Marshall programs beginning in December 2012.

The use of role players facilitates training exercises for the US armed forces. Those same training exercises that were conducted during the 9/11 attacks which caused confusion and may have been the catalyst to allowing for the globalist-controlled destruction the Twin Towers to go through without disruption.

Private sector persons provided by the DHS could and probably would be used to create a false flag attack by their mere presence.

The solicitation and culmination of this possible coming false flag may be on or around the time of December 2012. With the assistance of Obama, as Commander-in-Chief, the suspension of the 2012 elections could be declared with an executive order for preservation of continuity of government.

The planned false flag attack, according to a DHS whistleblower , will be a staged assignation attempt on Obama that will be linked to a white supremacist group that will be used to incite black and Hispanic Americans into starting riots all across the nation.

This race war will be the situation needed to implement martial law effectively locking down the US, US Army control of the urban cities, erecting DHS checkpoints on all major points of travel, severe restrictions on travel for all citizens and the suspension of elections to ensure that Obama remain seated as the President of the US.

The DHS informant stated: “The DHS is actively preparing for massive social unrest inside the United States. He then corrected himself, stating that ‘a civil war’ is the more appropriate term. Certain elements of the government are not only expecting and preparing for it, they are actually facilitating it.”

The DHS informant stressed that by using the Arab Spring as a model, riots would be staged in a “controlled chaos” as was “envisioned by these conspirators are riots starting in urban areas such as New York, followed by a disruption of business and commerce. They want to restrict travel, if not through high energy prices, then by checkpoints and curfews mandated by the rioting and unrest…The whole purpose is to keep Obama in office for another term, no matter how unpopular he is, as he is not finished changing our country from a Constitutional Republic.”

Once riots begin, DHS will be deploying US armed forces into urban cities to take control. After a planned disruption of commerce, the manufactured problem will be complete. Full-blown martial law will be in place.

The latest false flag attack involving a firearm was supposedly committed by Wade Michael Page who just happens to be an alleged white supremacist who is attacking a Sikh Temple.

Page, being a US Army veteran was a psychological operations specialist from Fort Bragg, North Carolina. His duties would have been to analyze, develop and distribute intelligence used to coerce the general population for a specific and desired psychological effect.

Surprisingly, Joseph Crowley of the House of Representatives wrote a letter in April to Attorney General Eric Holder and FBI Director Robert Muller, warning about this exact type of incident and requesting that the FBI monitor Sikh temples.

We should be vigilantly watching the mainstream media and pay close attention to the next false flag involving a gun, possibly more ties to white supremacy groups and attacks on constitutionalist movements that support the fight for our Constitutional Republic.

The mainstream media are pushing Page’s “neo-Nazi” ties and covering white supremacist connections that fall right in line with the narrative proposed by the DHS informant. By setting the stage now, the global Elite are paving the way for the false flag attack on Obama in the future – just in time for election season.

With the 2011 attack on the White House meant to become a full-blown incident that did not manifest, the DHS was poised to take over should their plans go off without a hitch. However, the accused that fired a rifle shot at the White House did not create a stir large enough in the American social meme as to create the uncontrollable riots the global Elite are manufacturing so that martial law can be instilled.

If the attempt on Obama’s life could not be enacted, a second assassination scenario may be brought to fruition involving the First Family. This would be the global Elite’s Plan B.

In the mainstream media , a story about a Washington, DC police officer that made a threat against the First Lady to fellow officers surfaced, yet just as quickly disappeared. Over breakfast, the officer allegedly said he would shoot Michelle Obama, the showed a picture of a gun he’d use on his cellular phone. Although the officer was not identified the idea was placed into the social meme. And it follows the plans cited by the DHS informant and lends credibility to his story.

Obama, as far as the globalists are concerned, must remain in office because he “has unfinished business and must be re-elected; even if this means creating a reason for Obama to declare the 2012 elections indefinitely postponed. The end-game plan for America is its destruction as a Constitutional Republic, with the assistance of the agencies under the umbrella of the DHS.”

The signing of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law gave Obama the means by which the US government could remove “suspected terrorists” from the general population, detain them indefinitely without right to trial and subjugate them to Guantanamo Bay-style treatment.

One snag in that strategy came last May when Federal Court Judge Katherine Forrest, in Manhattan, New York, stated that Obama failed to “pass constitutional muster” and ordered that the US military could not arbitrarily imprison Americans based on alleged terrorist activity in regard to the indefinite detention clause in the NDAA.

Lawyers for Obama and Leon Panetta, US Defense Secretary, have filed an appeal to reverse Forrest’s ruling in the 2nd US Circuit Court. Obama wants to be able to claim anyone a terrorist and have the right to imprison them without charge.

Forest wrote in the 68 page ruling: “There is a strong public interest in protecting rights guaranteed by the First Amendment. There is also a strong public interest in ensuring that due process rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment are protected by ensuring that ordinary citizens are able to understand the scope of conduct that could subject them to indefinite military detention.”

The justification for this reversal is that since that no citizen has been indefinitely detained yet, the clause should be open as an option. Legal representatives for the US government says that the ability to detain belligerent citizens must be allowed because of the threat of militants aligned against the government are deserving of such punishment.

Section 1021 of the NDAA, which was upheld by Congress, gives the US President the authority to hold a citizen for terrorist suspicions without just cause or proof “until the end of the hostilities” which is an indefinable amount of time.

In April, Virginia has passed a law that essentially refuses to comply with the indefinite detention provisions in the NDAA.

Complete cooperation in this false flag event would surely assist in the march toward a full globalist takeover of our Constitutional Republic, however it is not necessary. With the work of the corporate-controlled mainstream media, the masses are expected to fall in line and perform their function in this ultimate Hegelian Dialectic.

Source

INTERVIEW: ALTERING HUMAN CONSCIOUSNESS with JB Campbell

Dr. Rebecca Carley presents another powerful interview with the author of the modern militia movement, Bruce Campbell, on how jewish influence over every aspect of human existence is altering our psyche.

Read Bruce’s latest essay “The Jewfighters” here.

Whitewraithe~

HOW ZOG WATCHES YOUR EVERY MOVE

By Rev. Ted Pike with Harmony Daws

A free internet has enabled millions to realize the truth about the Zionist occupational government (ZOG) – Zionist power in America and in governments of the world. It has also greatly helped enlarge our understanding of the historic role of Jewish supremacism in fomenting movements such as free masonry, communism, and hate crimes legislation, designed to hasten Jewish world dominion. (See Jewish Activists Created Communism)

In response, the government of Israel has enlisted tens of thousands of Jewish “cyber warriors” worldwide to help counter truth on thousands of blogs and websites. (Web server Go Daddy terminated Truthtellers.org last month because of such pressure.)  The Jewish Anti-Defamation League continues to push for federal legislation, or a U.S. Department of Education decree, making it a “hate crime” against Jewish students to criticize Israel on university campuses. Last week the Jewish Telegraph Agency described criticism of Israel at US colleges as “overwhelming.” Israel is clearly unable to stem the tide, even in the “pro-Israel” U.S.A.

Thus, we appear to still enjoy a free society with civil liberties and rights to freedom of speech. Yet, behind the scenes, a phalanx of technology is being created that could be used to ultimately quell and outlaw inconvenient truth. Such technology, combined with legal precedent and a society well trained to hate “discriminators” and “the intolerant,” could do what still looks impossible today: Make Brave New World a reality.

Steps Toward Total Surveillance

The book New Conspiracy Reader (2004) presents four major components necessary for the level of control and surveillance required for a centrally controlled, global government:

 

  1. Super-fast digital face scan software: This implies super-fast computers.  The Zionist New World Order wants “digi-photo” files on every person on earth so that, even in speeding traffic, their computers can identify and track dissidents.
  2. A federally accessible database of digi-photographs.  The Real I.D. Act of 2005, plus Facebook, gives substance to such a database.  Laws have been changed to require that passports include digital biometrics, with digi-photos.  Facebook is a database of millions of digi-photos.
  3. Interception of internet traffic and downloading to computer sites. Israeli-backed companies Narus and Verint, with the help of NSA (the National Security Agency), through their hard and software taps, now monitor our telecommunications.
  4. Web cameras linked to the internet, installed at key places in the U.S. and overseas, especially airports.  Eventually, entirely linked to the internet, face scans, integrated with the files NSA already is keeping on at least a million Americans, will provide ZOG with an even more complete record of our movements.

All data will be stored in federal computers such as NSA’s Utah Data Center near Bluffdale. (See New NSA Spy Center: Total Invasion of Your Privacy) (This computer complex, occupying a million square feet, will be the world’s fastest and largest to date, permanently storing everything the government is at present illegally discovering about you.)

The above surveillance tools sound like spooky nightmares from Orwell. Yet they are already becoming a reality.  In May Congress passed the FAA Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2011, opening the door for as many as 30,000 drones to patrol U.S. air space by the end of the decade, feeding information to federal databases.

NSA’s Jaguar computer allegedly is able to pinpoint the location of anyone downloading online. New technology provides similar ability to track computer users. For years, the Israeli government has used drones to pinpoint locations of Hamas and other Arab leaders, empowering IDF to destroy them from the air. Imagine this power someday used by the US government.

Think that can’t happen in your nation? That’s what wealthy Russians thought at their tea parties in 1916. If the 20th century taught us anything, it is the bottomless capacity of human beings to brutalize those they have dehumanized or labeled as enemies of the “common good.”

Today, western governments increasingly pursue technologies and legal precedents that quietly steal all our freedoms. Thinly justified as necessary in the “war on terror,” these hold tremendous possibilities for enslavement. Entrenchment of Zionist power in western governments, media, and finance—and, now, telecommunication monitoring via Jewish internet giants—is so extensive there is little hope that it can be removed.  Total Jewish control of the world is prophesied in Scripture. (See ‘Babylon the Great’ is Israel) Yet God continues to give hope of postponement. How? By demonstrating that, when enough people speak out boldly against Jewish supremacism or Zionist oppressions, as did Jesus against the evil Jewish leaders of His day, God honors and rewards such truth-telling. Relatively recent examples of Zionist ambitions being set back include Israel’s disastrous interminable siege of Gaza (Israel’s greatest PR disaster ever), the flotilla debacle bringing international outrage against Israel, even recent cancellation of ABC’s sacrilegious “Good Christian Bitches” sitcom. (See Good Christian Bitches (GCB) Canceled!)

Christian civilization and influence have declined dramatically over the past century for a simple reason: The church is embarrassed by Jesus’ vitriolic attacks on evil Jewish leadership.  They think it “anti-Semitic” to copy His example today. The key to restraining the rise of the Great Harlot Israel, is a combination of mass public outcry coupled with specific, ethinic identification of the Jewish supremacists behind such conspiracy.

Getting Us Ready for World Government

To hold back the darkness, it is vitally important that we understand and educate others about the realities of ADL-originated discrimination and “human rights” laws, which prepare society to accept government thought and speech control. These technologies will become useful once society has accepted the premises justifying their use.

Anti-discrimination laws are explicitly based on the idea of protecting people from criticism, hatred or discrimination because of inherent qualities they can’t change. These are believed to include sexual orientation along with race, gender, age, and other attributes. (Religion is often thrown in, but not protected in reality.) A person’s “homophobic” or “racist” beliefs are considered a choice, not an inherent quality. Thus, they are not protected.

This explains the decision about a British bed-and-breakfast where the religious owners refused a room to a homosexual couple. They were sued and judgment passed against them. The homosexual couple’s “human rights” were upheld; the religious couple’s rights were considered invalid. This is because government preaches that you can change your religion but not your sexual orientation. And if your religion is “hateful,” you should change it.

This basis for human rights law is increasingly laid down by precedents throughout the west, including America. It leads in one direction: to the utter social divestment of people whose beliefs are unacceptable to the government. Today, they are not allowed to adopt children (as “homophobic” Christians are restricted in Britain). Tomorrow they may be put in “reeducation camps” to have their chosen beliefs forcibly changed. We must defend free speech even for the person whose beliefs we most loathe.

Unfortunately, the vast majority of Americans don’t know the first thing about hate crime or discrimination laws, how ADL is behind them, or how they lead to totalitarianism. Just like the giant computer in Utah, these laws quietly gobble the freedom we appear to still enjoy.

Take Action!

To counter the threats of freedom-stealing technology, and public willingness for the sake of security to let freedom be stolen, we must pursue attainable legislative goals. We have seen encouraging legislative precedents. Repeatedly, federal efforts to massively invade our privacy have been daunted by public outcry. In 2002 the Information Awareness Office was created by Congress in response to 9/11 to give the government unrestrained surveillance and eavesdropping powers over all telecommunications. Protest was so intense and widespread that by 2003 the IAO was defunded by Congress. The government has been forced to perform in secret much of what it hoped could be done with public approval. The same public outcry defeated the SOPA and PIPA internet takeover bills.

Persuading Congress to say “No!” to more legislation stealing internet privacy is an attainable goal.  Call your state’s U.S. Senators and those of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence right now protesting the CISPA (Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, H.R. 3523).  This bill authorizes Jewish telecommunication companies, such as Google, Verizon, Comcast, Facebook, and Time-Warner Cable, to spy on Americans for the government.  Call 202-224-1700. Members of this committee are posted on the Action Page at Truthtellers.org.


Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization.

Source

PLAYING WITH OUR LIVES –

THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S MURDEROUS AGENDA TO DISARM THE CITIZENRY

When will enough be enough??

Does it not seem highly unlikely that the murder spree in Aurora, CO. would not have happened if the government were not about to sign the upcoming U.N. Gun Treaty on July 27th, which is only seven days away?  Furthermore, it is also quite ironic that the tragic shooting at Columbine School happened 13 years ago and is only 13 miles away from Aurora.  Numerology has powerful meaning for the satanic criminal elite so you can bet that there is great significance in these particular numbers.

No doubt this was a planned false-flag psyop by C.I.A. spooks or some other nefarious group within the U.S. government.  Nothing about it rings coincidental or happen-stance.

According to CNN reports, suspiciously, the shooter received a phone call right before he pitched a  gas canister into the theater full of patrons at a midnight showing of THE DARK KNIGHT RISES.  That smacks of an MK-Ultra tactic.  I think it more than possible that the perpetrator was a sleeper agent, and at just the specific moment he was activated by the phone call in order to carry out this murderous deed.  He may also have no memory of the heinous act.

Paul Joseph Watson over at Prison Planet writes:

Within hours of the tragic shooting in Aurora, Colorado at a screening of the new Batman movie, the political machine is already gearing up to exploit the incident as a tool to demonize the second amendment and characterize Americans who are against big government as extremists.

A 6ft tall man dressed in black body armor and wearing a gas mask burst through an emergency exit door at the theater during a midnight screening of ‘The Dark Knight Rises’ Batman movie, before making his way up the stairs and shooting people at random, according to reports.

“A 24-year-old suspect in is custody and an apartment building in north Aurora connected to the suspect was being evacuated and searched for possible explosives, ” reports the Denver Post.

A possible motive for the shooting – bizarre as it sounds – is that, “the gunman carried out the shooting because the new Batman movie was sold out,” according to local reports.

Observers following news reports about the incident have already noticed that the tragedy is being exploited to demonize Americans suspicious of federal authority – noting that the villain in ‘The Dark Knight Rises’ is an anti-establishment character.

“They’re claiming that since the villain in the movie was “rising up” against authorities that’s what this guy may have been doing,” writes Brandon Nolley.

Others fear that the shooter will be labeled a “conspiracy theorist” and used to portray so-called “truthers” as violent extremists.

“I have a feeling he’s going to be a “extremist” with “Conspiracy theorist” views, may be he even saw Alex’s review of the movie,” writes Evan Munn. “They are going to parade out the children’s bodies like OKC.”

Others note that the mass shooting coincides with a UN arms treaty that threatens to grease the skids for a total gun ban in the United States. It’s inevitable that the event will be used to demonize the second amendment.

“The UN treaty will save us,” comments Michael Rozycki.

Every time there is a mass shooting in the United States, the establishment uses it to demonize its political adversaries.

Then Russia Today reports:

Initial media reports suggested that two gunmen were involved in the rampage. But police later said there was only one person involved as far as they know. The gunman was carrying a rifle and a handgun at the time of his arrest, police said at a media conference. One suspect was taken into police custody.

Witnesses reported seeing a tall, shotgun-wielding man clad in body armor and wearing a gas mask in the theatre. The attacker have set off some kind of a tear gas canister.

An apartment building was evacuated after the suspect told police there were explosives planted there following his apprehension. So far police have failed to find any traces of the alleged bombs.

Police responding to the shooting evacuated the area over fears that an explosive device might be on the premises.

Ten of the victims were killed right on the spot while four others died from injuries in hospital.

Aurora medical services were alerted to attend to the large number of injured. At least 50 people have been taken to hospital following the shooting, although it is not clear yet how many of them are in serious condition.

The FBI is considering raising the national security level nationwide following the shooting, Sky News says citing its sources.

At the other end of the spectrum Twitchy Entertainment reported that disgraceful celebrities and politicians were using the Colorado shooting to push gun control.  Here is a sampling of the comments:

Shameful gun control opportunists aren’t waiting for a complete investigation into the deadly movie theater shooting in Aurora, Colo. The gun-grabbers aren’t even waiting for the blood to dry before politicizing the massacre in an effort to gut the Second Amendment.

Twitchy reported earlier that comedian D.L. Hughley tweeted a reality-challenged gun control diatribe in the wake of the shooting.

Hughley was joined by ghoulish politicians, lapdog media goons and ignorant Hollywood celebs who took their gun control sloganeering to Twitter in the hours after 12 moviegoers lost their lives. It’s not just Rush Limbaugh and the Tea Party that are to blame — it’s guns, natch.

CNN host Piers Morgan loves working in America. The law of the land? Not so much.

Horrendous details from this Colorado cinema shooting. America has got to do something about its gun laws. Now is the time.—
Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) July 20, 2012

More Americans will buy guns after this, to defend themselves, and so the dangerous spiral descends. When/how does it stop? #Colorado
Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) July 20, 2012

Lunatics like this will always try and get guns. It should be 100,000 times harder than it is for them to do so. That’s my point. #Colorado
Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) July 20, 2012

No tears for the victims. Just revolting political opportunism.

Naturally, Soros monkey Eric Boehlert agrees with Morgan.

US gun culture; RT @ThePlumLineGS Agree with @jbouie here: if anything the shooting is about culture, not politics: wapo.st/ODQj4v
Eric Boehlert (@EricBoehlert) July 20, 2012

As does Univision’s Jorge Ramos.

Unless the US changes its gun laws, tragedies like the one in Colorado will keep on happening. But politicians don’t want to deal with that—
JORGE RAMOS (@jorgeramosnews) July 20, 2012

And Arianna Huffington.

People might say it’s too early to have the gun discussion Mayor Bloomberg wants. Actually, it’s too late.—
Arianna Huffington (@ariannahuff) July 20, 2012

But it’s not too late for the thousands of people who are alive now, but aren’t going to be in the next year due to gun violence.—
Arianna Huffington (@ariannahuff) July 20, 2012

Nanny Bloomberg, of course, couldn’t resist smearing his hands with the blood of the Colorado shooting victims.

It’s time for the presidential candidates to step up & tell us what they’ll do about guns in America: bit.ly/OMhDtN #Aurora
Mike Bloomberg (@MikeBloomberg) July 20, 2012

Bloomberg says shooting means time 4 tough national gun control laws. In unrelated news, 51 killed by guns in NYC in June—
Yossi Gestetner (@YossiGestetner) July 20, 2012

Mayor Bloomberg asks Obama for stricter gun laws following Colorado shooting. Yes, because criminals have always obeyed the laws you idiot.—
Andrew Wall (@Awall483) July 20, 2012

NYC mayor says “soothing words are nice” but says it’s time for gun control laws.—
(@toddstarnes) July 20, 2012

Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter is right on board, as are congressional liberals.

Let us keep the victims of violence in CO, and certainly in Phila in our thoughts and prayers. We must take strong action on gun violence!—
Michael A. Nutter (@Michael_Nutter) July 20, 2012

Such violent actions have absolutely no place in our society & won’t be condoned. We must confront the issue of gun violence.—
Charles Rangel (@cbrangel) July 20, 2012

The #theatershooting demonstrates the need for #guncontrol. #Aurora #Colorado
Yvette D. Clarke (@YvetteClarke) July 20, 2012

This is a sad and dark hour for our nation. How many more times are we going to go through this? So many innocent victims of gun violence—
John Lewis (@repjohnlewis) July 20, 2012

Smarty pants celebs like John Leguizamo, Dominic Monaghan, Rob Schneider and Henry Winkler delighted in piling on.

My heart goes 2 all the victims families in colorado. No one should have to go thru that. When r we gonna get guns removed in this country?!—
John Leguizamo (@JohnLeguizamo) July 20, 2012

I wonder if USA will have an open conversation about gun law after this tragic day in Aurora? Very sad.—
Dominic Monaghan (@DomsWildThings) July 20, 2012

Assault weapons are for killing. There are no rational reasons for allowing the sale of these weapons.—
Rob Schneider (@RobSchneider) July 20, 2012

@Vernaccini13 no …but rather individuals who have no business having guns get them far to easily !!!!!—
Henry Winkler (@hwinkler4real) July 20, 2012

@DisneyNut77 @bigfranky75 the sales of guns . the back ally market of sales, the DNA of so many being so damaged—
Henry Winkler (@hwinkler4real) July 20, 2012

And perhaps most despicably of all, author Salman Rushdie thought it would be hilarious to crap out a Batman pun.

The “right to bear arms” is the real Bane of America.—
Salman Rushdie (@SalmanRushdie) July 20, 2012

The right side of the Twitterverse immediately pushed back against the Left’s unseemly cries of “there oughta be a law.”

Mayor Bloomberg & Piers Morgan: gun control is not the answer. Families in #Aurora need prayer right now. Suggest you call for that instead.—
Krystal (@FriddleTweet) July 20, 2012

By all means, continue to blame the gun and the tea party, but not the shooter himself.—
Kevin Eder (@keder) July 20, 2012

The USA gun laws are absurd, no one should ever be able to own high velocity automatic weapons, tear gas & explosives. #theatershooting
Ryan (@RyanWalkinshaw) July 20, 2012

America needs tighter gun control laws, so every city can be just like Chicago.—
John Hayward (@Doc_0) July 20, 2012

The Colorado shooting is NOT a gun control issue; it’s a “parents please raise your children to not be psychos” issue. There, I said it.—
John Cachero (@johncachero) July 20, 2012

Some choose to blame guns and their political opponents for these murders, I choose to blame the killer.—
AG (@AG_Conservative) July 20, 2012

QFE: “All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all the guns…”
- Mao Tze Tung—
Adam Baldwin (@adamsbaldwin) July 20, 2012

One Twitter user sums up the most sickening aspect of today’s efforts to revive the gun control debate.

We have lost the ability to leave a tragedy a tragedy. The leftist media prohibits a non-political reaction. Sad.—
Brady Cremeens (@brady_cremeens) July 20, 2012

Just minutes ago the national news stations (CNN, FOX, MSNBC, etc.) are reporting that the film, THE DARK KNIGHT RISES, allegedly responsible for the perpetrator’s actions was pulled from theaters in Europe.  And because of today’s tragedy we’ll probably be seeing the TSA in American theaters within weeks.  This is a disaster!

Once again, the traitorous criminals in Washington are allowed to literally ‘get away’ with murdering more American civilians, while the imbecilic population clamors at their doors to save them from the only right we still have – to bear arms, that protects us – the people, from them – the criminal politicians.

And yet, we have a confirmed racist, marxist, communist, illegal-alien sock puppet sitting in the executive office at the White House doing the bidding of his criminal Jewish masters by allowing the continual murder of innocent Americans.  In the end, these criminals will manage to disarm the American people and effectively neutralize our ability to protect our lives, our families and private property.  When that happens nothing on God’s earth will save us from “them” and the living terrorist hell that will ensue, that no American can now foresee or even imagine and from which there will be no escape – except for death.

Lets hope, then, that the traitorous gun-grabbers get what they most richly deserve – a nice trip to their local FEMA camp.

Whitewraithe~

Sources:  PrisonPlanet.com, InfoWars.com, Twitchy.com, Google News

Must Listen: Deanna Spingola interviews John Kaminski

This is an incredible interview.  John elaborates on Tesla and his remarkable discoveries that were intended for the whole world and the Jewish influence surrounding his demise.  John also believes that Jews should be deprived of their citizenship because of their collective treason against the United States.  Kaminski is one of the few people in the truth movement that is willing to tell the whole truth warts and all.

Assassination Monopoly

They murdered 8 U.S. presidents,

5 Russian czars, the kings of England, France

and many other countries, and are still killing.

Who are they?

THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE OBVIOUS ANSWER!

Remember my children, that all the Earth must belong to us Jews, and that the Gentiles, being mere excrements of animals, must possess nothing.

— Mayer Amschel Rothschild on his deathbed, 1812

By John Kaminski

pseudoskylax@gmail.com

http://www.resist.com/kaminski/KaminskiConnection.html

http://johnkaminski.info/

The official history of presidential assassinations depicts them as random events performed by lone nuts who blow their tops and start shooting. But when we look at the pattern of murdered U.S. presidents, a disturbing pattern emerges.

All the U.S. presidents who died in office were all killed by the same mysterious people for the same mysterious reason — control of the money supply.

John F. Kennedy, in 1963, was jacked for challenging the hegemony of Israel, the mob, and the Federal Reserve; William McKinley, in 1900, was gut shot for opposing creation of the Federal Reserve; James Garfield, in 1881, was shot in the back shortly after uttering the assessment that bankers controlled everything; and Abraham Lincoln, in 1865, was unceremoniously terminated for creating an independent currency, as Kennedy did a century later.

In addition to the four well-known murders of American presidents, four other assassinations — William Henry Harrison (1841), Zachary Taylor (1850), Warren Harding (1926), and Franklin Roosevelt (1945) — are well documented outside the mainstream record of history, which is controlled by the people who hire these assassins.

All were liquidated for opposing the plans of the international bankers who have controlled the world since history began.

When you correlate the corpses of national leaders and their cause of death to their public statements, you discover the identity of the killers in every single case is Jewish, even if the actual assassins are non Jewish proxies. This even includes the killing of promising presidential candidate Huey Long in 1935, by a Jewish doctor named Carl Weiss. <http://www.hueylong.com/life-times/assassination.php>

When it comes to non presidential assassinations committed by Jews, the numbers run into the thousands. Some significant Judeo hits, all of which involved control of the money supply or suppression of other Jewish crime schemes, include Rep. Lewis McFadden in 1933, Treasury Secretary James Forrestal in 1949, and pop superstar Michael Jackson in 2009, all for trying to warn us about the Jewish takeover of the world.

But this horrible phenomenon extends far beyond the United States.

Four of five Russian czars of the 19th century (as well as a fifth in 1917) were assassinated by Jews — the same perfect record Jews own with American presidents.

Track this recurring political tool back as far as you like in history and you’ll find the same circumstances pertain to the assassinations of King Charles I of England and King Louis XVI of France, as well as innumerable kings of countless other countries, as far back in history as you care to look.

THE ASSASSINATION OF ALL 8

U.S. PRESIDENTS WAS DONE BY JEWS!

The first attempted U.S. presidential assassination occurred in 1835, when our 7th president, Andrew Jackson, successfully shut down the national bank, by which the European Jewish bankers controlled America. Would be assassin Richard Lawrence fired twice, but both shots misfired. Jackson promptly beat him with his cane.

<http://thetruthnews.info/bankers_and_presidents.html>

Assassination No 1. 

1841: WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON, 

our 9th president, killed by doctors. 

An official report at the time stated Harrison died not of pneumonia, which is the mainstream story, but really died from the treatment he was subjected to for “an ordinary winter cold.” In the Currier lithograph depicting Harrison’s death bed scene, Daniel Webster is shown giving an enthusiastic thumbs up. The August 1841 edition of the Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, published just a few months after Harrison’s death, suggests that it was the medical treatment that Harrison received, and not any virus or bacteria, which caused his demise. Vice President Tyler then broke all Harrison’s campaign promises and became a pariah to both parties.

<http://www.fcnp.com/540/harrison.htm>

Assassination No. 2.

1850: ZACHARY TAYLOR, our 12th president,

poisoned by a bowl of cherries and milk.

Hero general of the Mexican war, Taylor disagreed with the Democrats over the concept of a strong national bank and opposed the extension of slavery. They exhumed Taylor’s body in 1991 and found traces of arsenic in his bones. Vice President Fillmore reversed all his policies. Remember, 1848 was the year Karl Marx wrote the Communist manifesto and didn’t mention the Rothschilds.

<http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/05/29/117856/-THE-STRANGE-DEATH-OF-ZACHARY-TAYLOR>

http://thetruthnews.info/bankers_and_presidents.html

Assassination No. 3. 

1865: ABRAHAM LINCOLN, 

our 16th president, was shot in the head

and murdered in Ford’s Theater, Washington. The popular mainstream version is that Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth (a Jew) for opposing the plans of Rothschild bankers who were funding the Confederacy. Alternative versions of the story include the Jesuits had him killed out of revenge, Secretary of State Edwin Stanton arranged it, and the Lincoln was really the son of a North Carolina Jew named Springsteen. The key fact seems to be the Greenbacks currency Lincoln created when the bankers wanted 36 percent interest on loans to finance the North in the War Between the States.

<http://usa-the-republic.com/items%20of%20interest/abraham%20lincoln.html>

Assassination No. 4.

1881: JAMES GARFIELD, our 20th president, 

shot down in a Washington railroad station,

after saying bankers ran everything from behind the scenes. “Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce.” Two weeks later, Garfield was shot in the back by a delusional named Charles Guiteau, who supposedly was miffed about not being named ambassador to France. By the time Garfield died after 2 1/2 months of agony, his doctors had turned a three-inch-deep, harmless wound into a 20-inch-long contaminated canyon stretching from his ribs to his groin and oozing more pus each day. After Garfield’s death his physicians submitted a bill of $85,000 to the Senate. The Senators authorized a payment of only $10,000. Many of them referred to the doctors as quacks.

http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/gar.htm

Assassination No. 5. 

1900: WILLIAM McKINLEY, our 25th president, 

shot at point blank range in Buffalo, N.Y.

by a Jewish anarchist who got his gun from the notorious Emma Goldman in a Brooklyn Workingman’s Hall. Polish Jew Leon Czolgosz pumped two slugs into the president’s stomach at the World’s Fair while the president shook hands with citizens. Afterwards, a speech by Goldman was found in the assassin’s pocket. Bro. Nathanael Kapner writes: ” . . . McKinley was known as a “hard money” man. This was because he advocated a gold standard. Unlike his opponent, William Jennings Bryan, McKinley was against “easy money” with no backing — printed by Jewish lenders at interest to the borrower — namely the US government. But by fighting against “easy money,” (translate Jew-coined & printed-at-interest money) McKinley sealed his death warrant. A death warrant signed, sealed, and delivered by the powerful House Of Rothschild, criminals in bankers’ suits.”

http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=169

Assassination No. 6.

1923: WARREN G. HARDING, our 29th president, 

died in San Francisco after being poisoned 

for opposing Simon Guggenheim’s oil-related land grab in Alaska. Robust and healthy at age 57, Harding was the first U.S. president to visit Alaska. On the way back, he developed food poisoning. After lingering for a week in a San Francisco hotel room, he suddenly died. Four doctors attending to him could not agree on his cause of death. He was embalmed within the hour. Rumors blamed his jealous wife for avenging her husband’s infidelity, but Harding is most infamous for his complicity in the Teapot Dome scandal, after which his Interior secretary Albert Fall went to jail for selling multibillion dollar oil rights to oilman Harry Sinclair.

http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/terrorists_spies/assassins/warren_harding/index.html

Assassination No. 7

1945: FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT, 

our 32nd president, was murdered by his top adviser, 

Henry Morgenthau, for refusing to drop atomic bombs on Japan and his alleged reluctance to support the creation of the state of Israel. One week before his death, in a letter dated April 5, 1945, Roosevelt promised King Saud that he, as president of the United States, would take no hostile action against the Arabs and that the United States would not change its basic policy toward the Palestine issue without prior consultations with both Arabs and Jews. Roosevelt’s policy was reversed by his successor, Harry Truman, who later recognized the State of Israel 11 minutes after it declared itself a nation.

http://www.mideastweb.org/roosevelt.htm

Other numerous reports claimed FDR shot himself. “My mother always claimed that she was shopping in Bloomingdales in NYC at the time the news of FDR’s death was announced. She said that the announcement over the store intercom that day, right after it happened, clearly stated that he’d shot himself in the head. She also said that not long after, the story given out by the news media suddenly changed to his death having been of natural causes.”

http://lovkap.blogspot.com/2011/04/did-fdr-commit-suicide-or-was-he.html

Assassination No. 8

1963: JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY, our 34th president,

gunned down in Dallas by multiple unknown assailants.

The nation’s only Catholic president, Kennedy was snuffed by a corrupt coalition of many (including Lyndon Johnson and George H.W. Bush) for Israel, the mob and the Federal Reserve. Jennifer Lake writes: “Suggested reading on the JFK assassination: the book FINAL JUDGEMENT by Michael Collins Piper (downloadable) http://www.ety.com/HRP/booksonline/finaljudgement.pdf  Piper makes a case that JFK was thwarting the nuclear-weapons ambition of Israel. He writes “Israel achieved its nuclear weapons capabilities precisely because of the assassination of President Kennedy.” He notes an American Free Press headline: “New Evidence Ties Israel’s Nuclear Weapons Program to the New Orleans Connection in the JFK Conspiracy“.” And then there was also the not-so-little matter of his creating currency in an attempt to disempower the Federal Reserve.”

http://polioforever.wordpress.com/dr-marys-monkey/jfk-assassination/

In addition, there were failed assassination attempts against presidents Andrew Johnson, Theodore Roosevelt, FDR, Gerald Ford, and Ronald Reagan, all attributed to ‘lone nuts.’

But this well-documented historical pattern of Jewish homicidal mania against leaders who refused to knuckle under to bribes and blackmail extends across much of the world throughout history.

After the U.S., the second-most glaring example of the persistence of Jewish killers is what happened to Russia in the 1800s. Jewish anarchists killed all but one of five Russian czars in the 19th century, and culminated their murderous rampage by butchering the last czar and his whole family during the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, which was wholly the work of Jews funded by well-known Jewish bankers, principally Jacob Schiff, an agent of the Rothschilds.

1801: PAUL I

Catherine the Great was a German woman who engineered the killing of her husband Tsar Peter III and birthed Paul, whose father was her court lover. Paul first married the daughter of the Landgrave of Hesse, who furnished troops to England to suppress the American revolution. Nevetheless, Paul was a sincere king, who was eventually killed by his mother’s corrupt co-conspirators, as well as his own son. His big mistake appears to have been changing the rules of succession, depriving the nobility of its privileges, and prohibiting women from ever again being named monarch.

1825: ALEXANDER I

Catherine’s favorite grandson conspired in the murder of his father and, according to official records eventually died of typhus. But Count Cherep Spirodovich reveals that he was poisoned during a lunch with Jews, and never recovered. (p. 114, The Hidden Hand). Shortly thereafter, Nathan Rothschild tried to foment revolution in Russia, as his children did in 1830 and 1855.

1855: NICHOLAS I

England, France and Germany (by this time, all taken over by Jews: Disraeli in England, the poseur Napoleon III in France, and Bismarck in Germany) all joined together to prosecute the Crimean War in the south of Russia. It failed, but two years later, the czar, who had been called a demigod by a number of English writers, was poisoned by his own Jewish doctor.

1881: ALEXANDER II

Perhaps the saddest of all was the fate of a handsome prince known as the Tsar Liberator. He freed the Russian serfs in 1861, four years before Lincoln did the same. Most notably, he answered President Lincoln’s call for help and sent ships to San Francisco and New York to help save the Union during the War Between the States. Later he gave Alaska to the U.S. for practically nothing. He survived seven assassination attempts before being blown up by the Jews he did his level best to liberate. And it took two bombs to do it: while Alexander was riding in his carriage, a bomb went off devastating a whole neighborhood. The king leapt out to help the survivors, and as he did, another bomb killed him.

1917: NICHOLAS II

Russia’s last czar and his family were foully murdered by the Jews who were sent from America by the Jewish banker Jacob Schiff. It was the same thing the Jews had done to Russia for hundreds of years, only this time they succeeded in taking over the whole country. They created the Soviet Union, which killed 66 million Russian natives. The moral nature of Judaism is so insane that almost a hundred years after the man called a demigod, Nicholas I, was poisoned by his Jewish doctor, the very savage who killed more Russians than any other, Joseph Stalin, was himself poisoned by a Jewish doctor when he was of no more use to the Hidden Hand.

In practically every nation on this Earth, the Jewish Hidden Hand has killed legitimate leaders and replaced them with Rothschild-manipulated phonies. This story does not even include most of the world and the sabotage of legitimate governments and monarchies. The list would be too long for one story.

As much as I’d like to write more about the Jewish subversion of the 500 year old Habsburg Dynasty, or the intrigues of ancient Greece, Rome and Egypt, let’s just consider two more signal examples of this unending Jewish murder scheme.

1793: KING LOUIS XVI OF FRANCE

The ugliest revolution of all was the French Revolution, in which people all over France killed each other for reasons they themselves did not understand (a situation about to happen today in the United States). International Jewish money-lenders plotted and planned the Great French Revolution of 1789, exactly the same way as they had plotted and planned and financed the English Revolution of 1640-1649. The descendants of these same International Jewish Financiers have been The Secret Power behind every war and revolution from 1789 onwards. The king and his wife, the much maligned but throughly slandered Marie Antoinette, were eventually beheaded by Rothschild’s subversives, and France has never been the same since. A recent president of France, Sarkozy, was an actual CIA Mossad agent.

http://www.lovethetruth.com/books/pawns/03.htm

1645: KING CHARLES I OF ENGLAND

Jews were expelled from England in 1290, both for typical usurious criminality and for killing Christian children and draining them of their blood for Talmudic rituals. But in the 1600s, Dutch Jewish bankers bribed Oliver Cromwell to overthrow a weak King Charles I, and by manipulating the parliament, Cromwell succeeded. Charles was beheaded. The financial takeover of the world by Jews had begun, and the principal Jewish criminals of the world set up shop in the City of London, where they now coordinate the ruination and enslavement of the entire world.

http://www.heretical.com/British/jews1290.html

http://www.lovethetruth.com/books/pawns/02.htm

Count Cherep-Spirodovich, who had been a major general in the czar’s army, reveals many things in his 1926 book, “The Secret World Government, or ‘The Hidden Hand’”. Among those secrets were:

“The first Jesuits were Jews; that mysterious Russian Diplomacy, which so alarms Western Europe, is organised and carried on by Jews ; that mighty revolution (of 1848) which is at this moment preparing in Germany, is entirely developing under the auspices of Jews, who almost monopolise the professional chairs of Germany”.

“From all these numerous proofs that the Jews are the organizers of all the bloodshed, as CHRIST pointed it out (St. John, VIII,44) could we not deduce without the smallest doubt, that it will be Jews, who will plunge the United States into an ocean of blood in the nearest future, unless the Americans open their eyes and drop their blind groundless optimism….”

“Since the American Revolution the Jews have also been the real rulers of America and their power is constantly growing and becomes deadly in every sense, as the Jews themselves confirm it.”

So there you have the basic story of the greatest assassins the world has ever known, who have destroyed all the great nations of the world by their manipulations and corruptions. Today, under the white noise coma of public media completely controlled by Jews, we have two U.S. presidential candidates whose staff are dominated by warmongering Israeli Jews and corrupt Hebrew bankers. The world has been poisoned, and most societies destroyed, by the most evil people ever to walk the Earth — Talmudic Jews.

Until the Jews are utterly destroyed, and all traces of their perfidy and perversions totally erased, the world will never know peace.

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 250 N. McCall Rd. #2, Englewood FL 34223 USA. 

http://www.resist.com/kaminski/KaminskiConnection.html

http://johnkaminski.info/

Principal footnotes

• Major General Count Cherep-Spirodovich,

The Secret World Government, or ‘The Hidden Hand’,

Sons of Liberty Books, ISBN: 0-89562-166-5

PDF: http://www.resist.com/SecretGovernment-Spiridovich.pdf

• William Guy Carr, Pawns in the Game

http://www.lovethetruth.com/books/pawns/toc.htm

End note

REMINDER: The author of this article is banned by most websites, publications and radio shows for his forthright honesty about the world’s most forbidden topic. As most media outlets — even those pretending to be anti-Jewish — are funded (many covertly) by Jewish money, they are too cowardly to directly address this evil cause of virtually all the world’s problems. He is dependent on contributions from those genuinely interested in justice to survive and continue his work.

Source: newsletter

All Eyes On Damascus: NATO And SCO Set To Face Off In Syria

Damascus is the capital and largest ancient city of Syria. During the Second Crusade, around 1148, the city repelled attacks, finally being acquired by Salah Al’din in the mid 1100s. Salah al’Din granted scholars from far and wide the chance to study in one of the many Madrasahs scattered throughout the city’s neighborhoods. Almost unaffected by the war, the city remained an extremely clean and gorgeous site.

“In August 1914, most Germans regarded the armed conflict they were entering in spiritual terms. The war was above all an idea, not a conspiracy aimed at German territorial aggrandizement. To those who reflected on the matter, such aggrandizement was bound to be an offshoot of victory, a strategic necessity, and an accompaniment to German self-assertion, but territory was not what the war was about. Until September, the government and military had no concrete war aims, only a strategy and a vision, that of German expansion in an existential rather than a physical sense.

The idea that this was to be a “preventive war,” to forestall the aggressive designs and ambitions of the hostile powers surrounding Germany, was certainly a part of the thinking of men like Tirpitz and Moltke. Yet these defensive considerations, while often discussed, were invariably subsumed by a grand sense of German power, whose time, it was felt, had come. The two aspects, the practical and the idealistic, were not mutually exclusive, as so many historians who have debated the war aims have implied; both were essential ingredients of the German personality on the eve of the war.

Despite sufficient evidence from the Crimean War, the American Civil War, and the Boer War that a major conflagration would involve long, drawn-out, and bitter fighting, few strategists, tacticians, or planners, German or any other, foresaw anything but a quick resolution to a future conflict. Despite a growing preoccupation by the military in the course of the nineteenth century with size and numbers, with war as a mass phenomenon, the vision everywhere was still of a war of movement, heroism, and quick decisions. Railways would get men to the front promptly; machine guns would be used in attack; mighty ships and mighty artillery would overwhelm the enemy in short order. However, although matériel was important, war was regarded, especially in Germany, as the supreme test of spirit, and, as such, a test of vitality, culture, and life. War, wrote Friedrich von Bernhardi in 1911 in a volume that was to go through six German editions in two years, was a “life-giving principle.” It was an expression of a superior culture. “War,” wrote a contemporary of Bernhardi’s, was in fact “the price one must pay for culture.” In other words, whether considered as the foundation of culture or as steppingstone to a higher plateau of creativity and spirit, war was an essential part of a nation’s self-esteem and image.

At the outbreak of the war Germans were convinced, as Theodor Heuss, a staunch liberal and certainly no rabid nationalist, put it, of their “moral superiority,” their “moral strength,” and their “moral right.” For Conrad Haussmann, also on the liberal left, the war was a question of will: “In Germany there is a single will in everyone, the will to assert oneself.” Of course this was to be a national effort, this war, but only because it was to be an effort by every German.” – Modris Eksteins. “Rites of Spring: The Great War and the Birth of the Modern Age.” (1).

“And this, I think, has been a wake up call from hell. It is telling us you have the power now to act. Summon the will, because the terrorists have the will to destroy America, to destroy freedom, to destroy all of America’s allies and all the democracies, Israel being simply on the front line. They have the will, but they don’t have the power.” – War criminal and totalitarian liar Benjamin Netanyahu speaking about the meaning of the false flag 9/11 events on NBC on September 13, 2001. (2).

Syria is facing an existential crisis, as well as the rest of the Middle East. The stakes couldn’t be higher. Various plots are coming to a head in Damascus.

“Over the past sixteen months of the destabilization of Syria, NATO and the GCC have created a situation without exit that might well degenerate into global war,” wrote French journalist Thierry Meyssan on Monday, June 11. (3).

NATO’s military aggression against Syria is testing the members, unity, and vision of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). So far, they seem to be meeting the challenge, having met last Thursday and concluded that “they unanimously rejected military intervention as a way to resolve international hotspot issues,” (4).

The portrayal of the conflict in Syria has proven to be more important than the conflict itself. Impressions and perceptions spread through the airwaves are driving this war, not facts on the ground.

But the roadblock of truth has stopped those who are once again committing highway robbery on the road to war by stealing people’s minds and hearts with fabricated facts and fake images.

The Western mainstream media’s abysmal failure to sell a false narrative about Syria based on NATO propaganda has forced NATO and its allies to change strategy and use the option of good old fashioned warfare to bring down Syria. The delusional media war planners in Washington have forgotten the basics of war. You know, the kind of warfare that involves armies and soldiers, not cameras and images.

Washington didn’t face unified armies in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya. But Syria and Iran are different stories. These are not media wars. These are real wars against nations that can shoot back. An eye for an eye is now the motto. The criminal maniacs in Washington, NATO, and Israel won’t be the only ones who will dish out pain on history’s grandest of stages.

War is not about rooting for the good guys against the bad guys while watching bombs go off on television, as we have come to know it in the West. War is a very dirty business. Many millions will die if the insane leaders of the U.S., Saudi Arabia, and Israel continue to wage their campaign of terror, mass murder, and destabilization throughout the Middle East.

For Syria to go down, brainwashed NATO troops will have to get directly involved. The “Free Syrian Army” is in reality the Controlled Foreign Terrorists (CFT). The CFT cold-bloodedly murders women and children in their sleep. They can bomb Syrian churches and clinics all night, but they can’t take Syrian cities by day.

“The US and its allies have been actively supporting the Free Syrian Army (FSA) terrorists for over a year,” wrote Prof. Michel Chossudovsky on Friday, June 8. “The organization and training consisted in the deployment of Salafist and Al Qaeda affiliated terrorists, alongside the incursion of French, British, Qatari and Turkish special forces inside Syria. US-NATO sponsored mercenaries are recruited and trained in Saudi Arabia and Qatar,” (5).

The writer of the website, “Moon of Alabama,” says that the Syrian army is getting its act together and making moves against the foreign-backed terrorists, writing:

“Some UN people said that Syria is now in a civil war suggesting a somewhat even balance between the parties. I think that is hugely exaggerated. Western media claimed that the revolt in Syria was by all parts of the Syrian population and only now changes into a sectarian conflict. That is simply wrong. The fighting was from the very beginning sectarian with the rebels naming each Friday after this or that Sunni hero. These foreign supported, and partly foreign led, Sunni rebel groups will have huge difficulties to survive a real onslaught by the united Syrian army.” (6).

The bigger picture of the conflict in Syria has been reduced to occupy the background space of history, while fake humanitarian cries for intervention from the media brainwashed Western world have taken center stage.

There is every indication that the NATO-instigated crisis in Syria will draw out for a long time, bringing in Iran, Russia, and China into the picture. Save a new alliance between America and Iran, war will consume all the nations of the Middle East, cause the death of millions, and lead to America’s final act of strategic suicide in the region.

Such a global tragedy can only be prevented if wise men retake control of America’s policy towards Iran and end the feud before diehard fanatics lit the fuse and make Iranians and Americans fight against each other over nothing.

Flynt Leverett and Hillary Mann Leverett, two former senior officials in the National Security Council, have repeatedly warned against a U.S. military attack on Iran. On May 28th, they wrote:

There is “a very analogous logic at play in the Middle East.”  The United States “tried being the hegemon” in Afghanistan, Iraq, and other places in the regionThe results are clear:  America’s pursuit of hegemony in the Middle East “doesn’t work”; in fact, “it actually makes us weaker.”  Just as the United States had (and has) interests in Asia, it has “critical interests” in the Middle East.  And it can only protect and promote those interests by “having positive relations with all of the important players in the region—and especially with Iran.”  This, however, is “a strategic logic” that the Obama Administration “seems no more capable of embracing than its predecessors in the Bush 43 Administration.”  (Or, one might add, the Clinton and Bush 41 administrations.)  It is a profound “strategic failure.” (7).

The consequences of attacking Iran will be far-reaching and ultimately tragic. Only madmen are for a war against Iran. Washington must come to its senses, send packing the god of hubris, and rejoin humanity.

Sources: 

1. Modris Eksteins. “Rites of Spring: The Great War and the Birth of the Modern Age.” 1989. Key Porter Books: Toronto. Pg. 90-91.
2. NBC Nightly News with Tom Brokaw. Air date: September 13, 2001.
3.  “Russian Warning Shots”, by Thierry Meyssan, Voltaire Network, 11 June 2012, www.voltairenet.org/a174586
4.  “Half Of Humanity: SCO Opposes Global Military Interventions”, Voltaire Network, 10 June 2012, www.voltairenet.org/a174570
5.  Prof. Michel Chossudovsky. “Confronting Iran, “Protecting Israel”: The Real Reason for America’s War on Syria.” Global Research. June 8, 2012.
6. Moon of Alabama. “Syrian Army Is Now Taking The Initiative.” June 13, 2012.
7. Flynt Leverett and Hillary Mann Leverett. “Nuclear Talks With Iran Highlight The Downsides of America’s Ongoing Quest For Middle East Hegemony.” The Race For Iran. May 28, 2012.

Source

In Our Name: The Human Cost of the War on Terror

 

Dead Afghani Children

In the early days of the ‘War on Terror,’ US General Tommy Franks declared, “We don’t do body counts.” He was referring, of course, to the dead of Afghanistan. That the names of 9/11 victims have been appropriately written in stone, only makes it doubly striking that the war waged in their names generates little interest on non-US or NATO civilian deaths. In fact, a war now in its 11th year, comprising the invasion and occupation of two countries, as well as the ongoing bombing of at least three more, has not produced any holistic studies on its direct and indirect casualties.

That a global war can rage so long with no official will to ascertain the number of ‘others’ killed is indicative of the manner in which the cost of war is calculated by those states prosecuting it. Non-US and NATO dead, maimed, disappeared or displaced can’t be part of the equation if official policy is not to count. That there appears to be little public will to change that policy speaks of a more broadly worrying attitude toward ‘others,’ particularly Muslims. The UN and some NGO’s are attempting to count, however, mostly in the variety of local contexts engulfed in the conflict. Despite the hurdles of official obfuscation and public indifference, a catalogue of deadly consequences has begun to emerge.

Beginning in Afghanistan, most commonly cited studies on the 2001 invasion find that approximately 4,000 to 8,000 Afghani civilians died as a direct result of military operations. There are no figures for 2003-05, but in 2006 Human Rights Watch recorded just under 1,000 civilians killed in fighting. From 2007 to July 2011, the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) tallies at least 10,292 non-combatants killed. These figures, it should be emphasized, do include indirect deaths or injuries. Some thing of the scope of indirect deaths can be gleaned from a Guardian article – the most thorough journalistic report on the subject – which calculated that at least 20,000 more died as a result of displacement and famine due to the disruption in food supplies in the first year of the war alone. As well, according to Amnesty International, approximately 250,000 people fled to other countries in 2001 and at least 500,000 more have been internally displaced since.

Moving to Iraq, the Iraq Body Count project records approximately 115,000 civilians killed in the cross-fire from 2003 to August 2011. However, the World Health Organization’s Iraq Family Health Survey reports a figure of approximately 150,000 in just the first three years of the occupation. With indirect deaths added, The Lancet Study placed the estimate at approximately 600,000 in the same period. Moreover, an Opinion Research Business study estimated 1,000,000 violent deaths to have occurred by mid-2007. In addition, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees reported approximately 2,000,000 Iraqis displaced to other countries and 2,000,000 more internally displaced as of 2007. There is no solid information on indirect death or injury rates, but the documented collapse of the Iraqi healthcare system and infrastructure more generally (foremost in the region before 1991) does not suggest anything less than another atrocity.

Beyond the two states under occupation, the ‘War on Terror’ spills into a number of neighboring countries including Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia. Prime weapons deployed in these theatres have been US ‘drones,’ special operations groups, intelligence agents and the governments/armed forces of the countries involved. Given the often extra-judicial and covert nature of this theatre, calculating casualties is hampered by the virtual absence of independent data. Indeed, this is also a problem in Afghanistan and Iraq, but even so, considering only ‘drones’ thought to have been used in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia, the numbers of strikes is agreed to be on the rise. To date, the Bureau of Investigative Journalism reports that at least 357 strikes have occurred in Pakistan between 2004 and June 2012 (more than 300 under the Obama administration). At least 2,464 people have been killed, including a minimum of 484 civilians (168 children). The Washington Post adds 38 strikes resulting in 241 deaths (56 civilian) in Yemen. There are no figures for Somalia, but the New York Times confirms that operations have been ongoing since at least 2007.

Proponents of the war, official and public, will rush to retort that many of the citations in this article list most civilian deaths as the work of enemy combatants. But how can anyone confirm this when dependent on such a dearth of study? And as best highlighted by the ‘drone’ campaign, how can anyone transparently distinguish between civilians and combatants, when the latter’s assassins are also their judges? Indeed, even if accepted at face value, these attacks make the US government one of the most prolific, self-professed ‘target killers’ in history. Moreover, as a representative from UMANA commented on his study, “if the non-combatant status of one or more victim(s) remains under significant doubt, such deaths are not included in the overall number of civilian casualties. Thus, there is a significant possibility that UNAMA is under-reporting civilian casualties.” In fact, such problems are admitted by the authors of every study.

Pasting this patchy set of statistics together, the bottom end of the total non-US and NATO civilian deaths exceeds 140,000. The top end easily reaches 1,100,000. That’s 14,000 to 110,000 per year. To put these figures in some context, it is worth recalling that 40,000 civilians were killed by the Nazi ‘Blitz’ on Britain during WWII. As well, it should be recalled that in both low and high scenarios, figures for direct deaths in Afghanistan for 2003-5, and indirect deaths from 2003 to the present, are not available. Furthermore, civilian deaths caused by means other than drones, such as renditions and disappearances, are not counted from any arena, and casualties stemming from the military campaigns of proxies (e.g., the governments of Pakistan or Yemen) have not been tallied. The number alive, but injured, orphaned or otherwise disenfranchised, let alone those tortured in public and private prisons across the world, is also not tolled. And finally, the suffering of millions of displaced persons from Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan and elsewhere remains incalculable.

What has been counted here, even though tragically incomplete, illumines the reason US and NATO officials are reticent to publically do the same. To consider the staggering human cost of the ‘War on Terror’ would mean admitting that ‘terrorism’ is a two-way street and states, not militias, drive the heaviest weapons. General Franks’ preference not to count bodies is egregious, but unsurprising. That his lack of interest is echoed in the public spheres of the US and NATO countries, exposes the more astonishing consent (manufactured or not) of general populations, at least in the case of these Muslim victims. Nothing less than this official and public indifference explains the absence of any holistic study on civilian casualties, particularly while mourning the nearly 3,000 civilians killed on 9/11 and in whose name the ‘War on Terror’ is still waged.


M. Reza Pirbhai is an Assistant Professor of South Asian History at
Louisiana State University. He can be reached at: rpirbhai@lsu.edu

Source

www.uruknet.info?p=88726

ESCAPE FROM DETROIT

WW~Notes: Race is not an issue that I like to focus on mainly because of the backlash it creates.  No one wants to face the shortcomings of their racial identity especially in America.  Yet, I found the following article compelling because it clearly illustrates how one race can be capable of destroying a once beautiful and thriving American city; but for what reason?  Another race built it so the oppressed race took license and pleasure in destroying it running the other race out of town?  That’s just an educated guess. 

What I can relate to regarding the fate of Detroit is that the same thing is now occurring in my home town of Memphis.  Memphis in the 1960′s was one of the best cities in America to raise a family.  No more.  The public school system is in a deplorable state of decay graduating students that still are illiterate.  Violence, drugs, police brutality, murder and other domestic problems escalated after I left nearly a decade ago.  The once safe, neatly kept middle-class neighborhoods are in shambles across the city.  And don’t be caught outside after dark; a stray bullet just might find you.

“Learn, Whitey, Learn!”—Paul Kersey’s ESCAPE FROM DETROIT

By Peter Bradley

Paul Kersey is best known as the man behind Stuff Black People Don’t Like, a Dissident Right blog that chronicles the increasingly dysfunctional and violent nature of black America. But in his new book, Escape from Detroit:The Collapse of America’s Black Metropolis , he concentrates on the role of race and demographic change in the fall of the Motor City.

Demography is destiny and that is very evident in Detroit. In 1912, blacks were slightly over one percent of the population. One hundred years later, blacks are 82 percent of Detroit (and 92 percent of the core city). They have controlled the city government for roughly 40 years. During that time, Detroit went from being the “Paris of the West” and the “Arsenal of Democracy” to a symbol of American failure, ineptitude and decline.

In the 1920s, Detroit was home to the tallest buildings in the world. It was a cosmopolitan city with a thriving arts and cultural scene. Its innovative architecture can still be seen today in empty and dilapidated old buildings such as Michigan Central Station, the Metropolitan Building, Lee Plaza and Broderick Tower.(Right.)

Even into the 1960s, Detroit was a modern, advanced and civilized place. It was even a candidate to host the 1968 Olympics. This hilarious 1965 promotional video [Detroit: City on the Move in the '60s— narrated by then-mayor Jerome Cavanagh, more on him later—shows Detroit right before the collapse (it “stands at the threshold of a bright new future,” as the video puts it). The comment thread on YouTube suggests it was made in an attempt to halt white flight—blacks were just 26% of the population in the mid-1960s but committed over 65% of the crime.

(Ironically, the New York Times has just linked to a similar video, apparently because it also features GOP nominee Mitt Romney’s father, George W. Romney, the then - Governor of Michigan. The NYT concluded, typically: “Who knows if the Olympics could have helped Detroit mitigate [the coming] calamities?” Paul Kersey knows! Flashback Friday: Detroit’s Olympic Dream , By Joanne C. Gerstner, May 23, 2012)

Whites were still over 70 percent of Detroit’s population at this point and the city boasted museums, a symphony, parks, beaches, skyscrapers, universities, libraries, highways, good schools and restaurants, businesses, night life, theaters, concerts and numerous cultural festivals. The video shows flocks of white people (with only occasional blacks) going about their daily lives and having fun. Detroit truly was “A City on the Move.” It must be painful for the old white residents of Detroit to view this and remember how great their city used to be.

Today’s Detroit is a much different place. It has lost over 60 percent of its population since 1950. Half of all people in the city are functionally illiterate. It has not one major supermarket chain . All public school students are eligible for the free lunch program. Detroit is home to the largest deserted skyscraper in the world. Billions of gallons of water are lost every year through a neglected, century-old sewer system. The average price of a home in 2009 was just $7,000.

Forbes recently rated Detroit as “The Most Dangerous City in America,” and with good reason. Since 1969, over 21,000 people have been murdered in the city. This comes on the heels of Forbes rating it as “The Most Miserable City” in 2008.

On top of all this, Detroit is bankrupt, loaded with debt and on the verge of being placed under emergency management a.k.a. be declared unfit to govern itself by the state of Michigan. (Detroit challenges consent agreement in court, By Darren Nichols and Oralandar Brand-Williams, The Detroit News, June 3, 2012).

Kersey points to the years 1967 and 1973 as key to sealing the fate of Detroit.

On July 23, 1967, police raided an illegal after-hours bar in a black neighborhood. This seemingly minor incident triggered a riot by blacks that resulted in 43 dead, over a thousand injured, 5,000 left homeless, 2,500 businesses looted and $134 million in property damage. Federal troops had to be called in to stop the riots, which lasted for five days. “It looks like Berlin in 1945” said a dispirited Mayor Cavanagh.

Cavanagh was a white Democrat who had come to office unexpectedly with massive black support after running against “police brutality.” He sought to consolidate this support by marching with Martin Luther King, implementing affirmative action in government hiring, getting millions in federal funds for “anti-poverty” programs and generally pandering to black race activists. Before the riots, Cavanagh was considered an emerging star with an appeal similar to that of John F. Kennedy. He was blamed for his slow response in stopping the violence, and the riots effectively finished his political career. ["Phooie on Louie: African American Detroit and the Election of Jerry Cavanagh". By Joseph Turrini Michigan History, Nov./Dec. 1999. ]

As an aside, it is worth noting that Detroit was home to the last white-on-black riot in the U.S. in 1943—sparked by a fight between a white sailor and a black who had insulted the white’s girlfriend.

Kersey does an excellent job tracking down long forgotten books and articles about Detroit. Predictably, the 1967 riots were blamed on whites. The August 4, 1967 Life magazine cover read: Negro Revolt: The Flames Spread. The magazine praised the “progressive” policies of Cavanagh but wrote:

… Beneath the surface the city simmered. Few of the statistics meant much to the Negroes who inhabited the eight-block area of 12th Street where the rioting erupted. The unemployment rate there was still 11%, and even higher among Negro youth. The area was the most densely populated in the city. Only 17% of the residents owned their own homes – compared with 60% in the entire city. … Even though economic conditions had improved, it served simply to raise Negro expectation – and the inevitable frustration when those hopes were not quickly satisfied. In the carnival-like revel of looting, Negroes took liquor, color TV sets and hi-fi phonographs. …

The rioting demonstrated the power of the discontented to disrupt and paralyze any city and the difficulty of reimposing law and order. It also raised the menacing prospect of white backlash. Whites have already started a run on gun shops and there was a danger that any community confronted by racial violence might be split into armed camps, white vs. Negro. If this occurs, an important lesson of the violence will be obscured. That lesson, says a Detroit psychologist, is ‘Learn, whitey, learn.’

But by 1967, white backlash took the form of leaving rather than retaliating. White flight was already underway but the 1967 riots took it to another level. Whites were 72 percent of the population in 1960 but dropped to 56 percent by 1970.

The 1967 riots helped usher in the ultimate death blow to Detroit – political control by blacks. By 1973, the city had a narrow black majority and the mayoral election was essentially a racial headcount. Black Democrat Coleman Young campaigned against “police brutality” while his white opponent John Nichols ran on a law and order platform. Young won by a few thousand votes and would begin a 20 year reign that finished off what was left of Detroit.

The city became the crime capital of America in the 1970s and Young implemented massive affirmative action for city employment. To give an example of the kind of leader he was, here is Young, quoted by Kersey, on affirmative action:

“Some people say affirmative action is discrimination in reverse. You’re damned right. The only way to handle discrimination is to reverse it.”

Kersey cites an August 1991 American Renaissance article by William Robertson Boggs on what Young’s leadership meant for Detroit:

Now, no other city in the United States has a character or identity that is so clearly black. Mayor Coleman Young calls himself “the black mayor of a black city.”  This is scarcely an exaggeration. The police chief and all four police commissioners are black. The school superintendent is black, as are the heads of virtually every city department. Both of the city’s congressmen and most of its judges are black.  While federal and state subsidies keep Detroit from complete collapse, Mayor Young operates his city much as an African potentate might. His picture hangs in every city office building, and his name graces the municipal letterhead. The personal business cards of every city employee bear the mayor’s name. At every opportunity, he names parks and civic centers after himself. Even the city zoo is now named for Coleman A. Young. The very history of the city now has something of a colonial-African hue. The period of prosperity before the riots is now officially viewed as analogous to colonization. A city document describes the pre-1967 police force as “a hostile white army, entrusted by white authorities with the job of keeping non-whites penned up in ghettos.”As the riots recede further into the past, they are increasingly seen as a glorious insurrection, in which the oppressed black man threw off his shackles and wrested control from the white man. Detroit even has its own anthem, which is also the unofficial anthem of black America: Lift Every Voice and Sing. The people of Detroit still sing the Star Spangled Banner when the presence of whites makes it necessary, but it is invariably followed by an enthusiastic chorus of what Detroiters call “our”anthem. No city in America is more self-consciously black, no city more clearly and completely governed by blacks than Detroit.

But what about the role of the auto industry? Doesn’t its decline have something to do with the collapse of the Motor City?

In one of the best chapters of Escape From Detroit, Kersey compares the fate of Detroit to another Rust Belt city—Pittsburgh. The steel industry in Pittsburgh was hit much harder than the auto industry in Detroit in the 1970s and 80s. Yet the loss of its main industry did not cause Pittsburgh residents to riot and burn down their city. In fact, Forbes recently named Pittsburgh “The Most Livable City in America.” The Economist called Pittsburgh “The Best City in America.”

Of course, Pittsburgh is one of the whitest big cities in America while Detroit is the blackest. Whites are 65 percent of the population in Pittsburgh while blacks are only 25 percent. Whites comprise nearly 90 percent of the greater Pittsburgh metro area.

Escape From Detroit is vigorously written, well-researched—and visibly self-published. As Jared Taylor discovered last year, racial truths are unfit to print in today’s America. Paul Kersey did not even try to find a mainstream publisher. But the truths about how black crime and political incompetence destroyed a once great city need to be told. And they can be found nowhere else.

And, despite almost no publicity outside of his blog, Kersey has already sold over 1,000 copies of his book. The proceeds will help Kersey with his next book, in which he will turn his sights on what black leadership has done to Atlanta.

Peter Bradley (email him) he writes from Washington D.C.

www.vdare.com

Source

It makes me sad..

“Tears are the symbol of the inability of the soul to restrain its emotion and retain its self command.”

It makes me sad that your tribe has infiltrated and corrupted my government at every level; executive, judicial and legislative.

It makes me sad that your tribe coerces our elected officials to do its bidding through blackmail, bribery and murder.

It makes me sad that your tribe is directly responsible for the pre-meditated destruction of the united states of America, which occured in 1871 when it became a corporation.

It makes me sad that your tribe has usurped my country and now control and rule with an iron hand every single aspect of society.

It makes me sad that your tribe uses pornography, drugs, and other vice through entertainment to subdue and destroy our young people.

It makes me sad that your tribe is responsible for the usury system through the Federal Reserve and it’s enforcement arm the Internal Revenue Service, which has drained America of the last vestiges of its wealth thereby destroying all future prosperity.

It makes me sad that your tribe is directly responsible for the harassement at America’s once great airports through the installment of the licentious, pedophilic TSA all courtesy of the phony “war on terror.”

It makes me sad that your tribe dumbed-down our educational system that was once the best in the world offering every class of Americans literacy and knowledge that would enlighten and sustain them throughout life.

It makes me sad that your tribe infiltrated all aspects of Christianity, perverted Christ’s teachings thereby destroying Christianity’s true message of hope and forgiveness.

It makes me sad that your tribe insidiously oppresses the Palestinian people day after day with horrific crimes against humanity because Israeli Jews believe they are the only ones who have the right to exist in that region.

It makes me sad that your tribe is responsible for the destruction of America’s once great medical institutions that provided optimum healthcare for everyone.

It makes me sad that your tribe infiltrated our legal system, perverted the equitable system of common law in the land, and instituted Maritime Admiralty law instead which implies guilt before innocence.

It makes me sad that your tribe has perverted the civil right of innocence before guilt in the minds of our domestic police force where instead of police officers being respected they are feared.

It makes me sad that your tribe has proselytized our military schools and the entire military force in believing that their only allegiance is to a foreign racist state.

It makes me sad that your tribe is responsible for the regression of humanity’s great accomplishments in obtaining liberty, equality and freedom for all men through the creation of the Magna Carta in 1215 A.D. We now live in a less free society than our ancestors did nearly 800 years ago.

It makes me sad that your tribe with all its wealth and power and control are not yet done, you want more because of your insatiable greed and vengence against the Gentile.

It makes me sad that your tribe persists in its pursuit to rob and rape America until nothing of value is left according to Israel’s supreme leader who recently stated, “Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away.”

It makes me sad that your tribe has destroyed any worthy future for my grandchildren.

It makes me sad that I grew up in the freest nation on earth harboring no ill will toward any one race or religion until I discovered that a different tribe of religious people hated me because I was not like them.

This statue has the inscription “Better To Die On Your Feet Than Live For Ever On Your Knees”, to remember the 21,000 men and women who went to Spain to fight facism from 1936-1939. It stands in Glasgow, Scotland.

What makes me really happy is now I know why, and hope endures that one day your tribe will suffer the defeat it so justly deserves.  

Whitewraithe~

Masters of the Universe Descend on Chantilly for Annual Confab

Bilderberg 2012: the technocrats are rising at this year’s annual conference

Our man at Bilderberg is back for a fourth year and has touched down in Chantilly for the 2012 gathering. The shadowy elite leaders’ conference starts tomorrow, so what’s on the agenda?

Dutch Queen Beatrix arrives at the 2010 Bilderberg conference in Sitges, Spain. Photograph: Nero Angelo

It’s all change at Bilderberg this year, with a new chairman, new media and Occupy Bilderberg knocking at the gates.

Everything’s set. The hotel is being primped and hoovered, the security is arriving, the press is nowhere to be seen, and I just had a really boring crab salad. It’s shaping up to be a vintage Bilderberg.

We were lunching in the Palm Court restaurant of the Westfields Marriott hotel, in Chantilly, Virginia. A few days from now, this hotel will be dripping with billionaires and bankers, industry CEOs and finance ministers, here for the annual Bilderberg summit. “The leaders of the world are coming to our hotel”, beams one member of staff. “Are you here for the brunch?”

We are. Most of the other guests have left by now. The hotel is edging towards lockdown. All that’s left is a team of nervy conference organizer who start filming us with their iPhones, several dozen security operatives, me, my wife and a really rather boring ‘spook’, brunching on an adjacent table.

He droned on for the full length of a crab salad about his “internal and external drivers”, about how “I got a panel of three-star admirals together” to secure a “$30m contract” and how “CACI excels in capture management”.

He talked fondly of CACI International Inc (a giant defense contractor), although more recently he’s had “a nice success rate with Booz Allen” (another giant defense contractor). His world was the deathly dull blur between the federal government and private defense corporations. The grim feeding trough of “systems solutions”, “security logistics” and “mission assurance”. My crab ended just as he was declaring, wisely: “When you leave the navy and you go to a contractor, you say: what’s my mission?”

His mission for the next week or so is to keep the queen of the Netherlands, the chairman of Barclays, and the chairman, vice-chairman and CEO of Shell Oil safe and sound for a three-day conference. The hotel is encircled by the offices of the world’s largest arms’ manufacturers, 15 minutes up the road from the headquarters of the CIA. I suspect they’ll be OK.

Chantilly, site of the 2012 Bilderberg conference

Welcome to Chantilly: a little bit of paradise on earth. Photograph: Charlie Skelton for the Guardian

The Bilderberg conference was last here in Chantilly, at the exact same godforsaken spot, back in 2008 – which, like 2012, was a US election year, and the moment the current economic woes really started hitting the fan. You might remember, it was the year when then-senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton paid a flying visit to Bilderberg (aka ‘an event in northern Virginia’), after shaking off the press pack during the Democratic presidential campaign. AP had the story:

“Reporters travelling with Obama sensed something might be happening between the pair might when they arrived at Dulles International Airport after an event in northern Virginia and Obama was not aboard the airplane.”

You can watch the hilarious footage of Robert Gibbs, Obama’s press secretary, trying (and failing) to placate a furious press corp, who found themselves tricked aboard a flight to Chicago. “Others had a desire to meet with him in a private way,” he explains. This is an extraordinary admission from Gibbs – “others” clicked their fingers, and Obama came running, with Hillary in tow.

Bill Clinton was introduced to the political big league at Bilderberg 1991. The man who introduced him was Vernon Jackson, a lawyer, civil rights activist and currently board member of Lazard investment bank. Speaking last year about the occasion, Jackson recalls:

“In 1991, I took Bill Clinton to the Bilderberg meetings in Baden Baden, Germany. Bilderberg meetings have been going on since 1954, sort of the North-American / European Alliance.”

Later, after Clinton won the election:

“The steering committee of Bilderberg came to Washington in January, and I called the president up and I said ‘Mr President, they’re here’ – and he came to the Four Seasons hotel, and the Europeans felt like they owned him because they met him when he was totally unknown.”

That’s interesting: a meeting of the Bilderberg steering committee at the Four Seasons in Washington? In January? But according to Bilderberg’s official website, “Bilderberg’s only activity is its annual conference”.

As for this year’s election, rumours are already circulating about Bilderberg and presidential running mates, sparked off by a Washington Post report back in April on the matter of Republican senator Marco Rubio’s speech at the Summit of the Americas:

“[John] Edwards gave a speech in June 2004 at the Bilderberg conference that was widely credited as one reason John Kerry chose him.”

Aside from the US presidency, the big debate of Bilderberg 2012 is likely to be: what in Hades do we do about Greece? The Eurozone is Bilderberg’s biggest project, but it’s been looking distinctly shaky of late. What’s to be done? You can feel the unwillingness of Bilderberg to countenance a ‘Grexit’ in the stern words of Bilderberg spokesperson, the UK member of parliament for Rushcliffe, Kenneth Clarke. To leave the Euro, says Clarke, would be “disastrous” for the Greeks. “If they get a hopeless lot of rather cranky extremists elected at the next election then they will default on their debt.” Clarke took the time to brand eurosceptic British MPs “right-wing nationalists”, and euroscepticism itself “irresponsible”.

Clarke’s most telling remark is that: “It’s going to take a crisis, an absolute crisis, to make Europe’s leaders act.” This week’s Economist magazine agrees: “For the past six decades, steps forward to greater European union have taken place at moments of incipient crisis.”

“A consensus is slowly emerging that, whether a Greek exit is to be averted or weathered, there will have to be a greater level of integration in the euro zone, with tighter constraints on the freedom of national governments.”

This message, that out of the struggle will come a new strength, seems to be the Bilderbergian line. For example, EU Commissioner Joaquin Almunia (whom we spotted at Bilderberg 2010) says we need now to “reinforce the European Parliament’s role” which “will also strengthen the role of the [EU] Commission”. So his solution to the crisis: “I need a bigger office.”

The Economist says that if the “elite venture” of Europe is to survive and thrive, “Europe’s elites” have got their work cut out. It ventures to give the elites some “unashamedly technocratic” advice on how to forge their closer union, but it needn’t worry, the technocrats of Bilderberg seems to have the matter in hand. Mario Monti (unelected Italian PM, Bilderberg steering committee) said this week: “Europe can have euro bonds soon.”

But we’re not in Europe now, we’re in Chantilly, and the CIA is just up the road from the conference venue, so protestors had better stay on their best behaviour. And we’re expecting plenty of them – gathering under the activist umbrella: “Occupy Bilderberg”

What a difference a year makes. Occupy Bilderberg? I love it. The Occupy movement seems finally to have realised that the problem isn’t the 1%, it’s the 0.001%. It’s the guys and gals and whatever David Rockefeller is who are meeting in Chantilly, Virginia, at the end of the week. Many hundreds of protestors have pledged to show up. And who knows, they may just manage to drag the mainstream news media with them.

Historically, one of the biggest problems people have had with Occupy is that its aims and demands have been a little, shall we say, “diffuse”. Not the case with Occupy Bilderberg. That’s the nail getting hit squarely on the head. Occupy Bilderberg is keyhole activism. Picking the exact right spot and sticking the scissors in.

“We refuse to pay for the banks’ crisis” was the cry from OccupyLSX back in the autumn. They demanded an end to “our democracy representing corporations instead of the people.” What Bilderberg represents is the fact that our democracy IS our corporations. And politics is just the wake behind a shark fin.

Time to go fishing.

Source

BLACK PERSPECTIVE: Exposing the Jewish Mafia


JAM

One of the very first truthtellers I discovered was John Alan Martinson.  Over the last few years we’ve become good friends, and although, he is not as prevalent in the movement to expose the Synagogue of Satan the material we do have will stand as a supreme testament to his honor and determination to forewarn all Americans, black and white, of the enemy within.

John makes it vividly clear that the Jew is not the Black man’s friend or ally.  They never were.  The Jew is still working to divide and conquer the races in America.  By keeping us at each other’s throats distracts us so that the enemy can further undermine our society. 

Here is a radio interview from January 2012 on the Freedom of Information show out of Chicago. 

At the show’s end John shares with the audience what Voltaire said about the Jews:

”They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race…

Note: The VoiceofVenom website is no longer active. 

Check out the Martinson Edition of Freemasonry & Judaism: The Secret Powers Behind Revolution here.

WW~

PODCAST: The True History Behind World War II

Keith Johnson webmaster of REVOLT OF THE PLEBS interviews fellow websmaster of ZION CRIME FACTORY for one of the most interesting interviews on the real history of WWII, Hitler, Naziism and the Holocaust.

Jonathan Azaziah of MASK OF ZION calls in to comment further on international Jewry’s involvement to start this world war.

 

 

Whitewraithe~

Source