Photo of the Day – A House of Cards

Here is another brilliant photo composite from Dees Illustrations which can be found at daily.

With the advent of the internet this fragile house of lies, deceit and obfuscation will, eventually, fall due to the enlightenment of the masses from this electronic wonder. Before the internet, I would imagine that most of us had not the farthest notion, except for a minuscule few, of the truth surrounding these organizations and their ideologies. The net smashed through their facades like the wrecking ball in the image and the light of truth came shining through.

Might I suggest that we begin mirroring or downloading websites which house this crucial information if nothing more than for the sake of posterity and for our descendants. One day in the not too distant future the information will be gone from cyberspace; censored out like a bad dream. Volumes of books dealing in the same subjects are being removed from our libraries, as well.

We are the last generation to have such a vast, wealth of esoteric knowledge and information at our disposal simply by the click of a computer mouse and for that reason everything that can be saved and stored for the next generation is one of our primary responsibilities for the preservation of the truth.

We may not be able to save our world from a totalitarian regime built on corruption and enslavement, but maybe, just maybe, the next generation can.

But first, we must provide the tools of truth which will be the enemy’s ultimate downfall because knowledge is power.


The True Story of the Bilderberg Group

Note: At the beginning of the audio interview shown below, Estulin states that the Bilderberg group is not a Masonic or Jewish conspiracy. Unfortunately, he reveals his indoctrination into the New World Order by not mentioning the J word. The Bilderberg group is replete with Freemasons and Jews and of course, it’s about a new world order or as Estulin states a “One World Government.” Powerful world Jewry has been planning this takeover, at least, the past 60 years if not longer. The United States is already under their complete control. Israel and the Jews own us! Don’t think for one minute that they will stop with America. Not a chance. They won’t quit until a central bank is in every country on the planet and every goyim is under their thumbs. ~WW~

“In 1954, the most powerful men in the world met for the first time under the auspices of the Dutch royal crown and the Rockefeller family at the luxurious Hotel Bilderberg in the small Dutch town of Oosterbeck. For an entire weekend, the debated the future of the world. When it was over, they decided to meet once every year to exchange ideas and analyze international affairs. They named themselves the Bilderberg Group. Since then, they have gathered yearly in a luxurious hotel somewhere in the world to try to decide the future of humanity. Among the select members of this club are Bill Clinton, Paul Wolfowitz, Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Tony Blair and many other heads of government, businessmen, politicians, bankers and journalists from all over the world,” writes journalist Daniel Estulin in the opening paragraph of the introduction to his must-read book, The True Story of the Bilderberg Group.

“Nevertheless, in the more than fifty years of their meetings, the press has never been allowed to attend, no statements have ever been released on the attendees’ conclusions, nor has any agenda for a Bilderberg meeting been made public,” Estulin notes.

For some 15 years, Estulin has been a thorn in the sides of the Bilderbergers, relentlessly hunting down their secret meeting places, gaining inside sources who divulge what goes on behind closed doors, even photographing attendees and publicly disclosing it all. Now he has put it all in a book that every person who values freedom and democracy should read.

The Bilderbergers are so secretive that they even try to hide, until the last minute, the location of their gathering places. Attendance is by invitation only and if an invitee’s name is publicly disclosed beforehand, he or she is disinvited.

Perhaps these three quotes will explain what the secrecy is all about. The Times of London in 1977 called the Bilderbergers “a clique of the richest, economically and politically most powerful and influential men in the Western world, who meet secretly to plan events that later appear just to happen.”

Said Bilderberg Group founder Prince Bernhard of The Netherlands, “It is difficult to re-educate people who have been brought up on nationalism to the idea of relinquishing part of their sovereignty to a supranational body.” (The late prince has been replaced by his daughter, Queen Beatrix, who regularly attends the Bilderberg meetings.)

Former British Defense Minister Denis Healey, put it this way, “World events do not occur by accident. They are made to happen, whether it is to do with national issues or commerce; and most of them are staged and managed by those who hold the purse strings.”

Every US president since Eisenhower has either belonged to the Bilderberg Group or its older parallel group, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), or been approved by them. As Estulin wrote, the race is no contest when you own both horses. That is why no matter which political party is in power nothing really changes other than the packaging. The puppets who drink at the champagne fountains of the powerful do the bidding of their masters. The people are superfluous to the process.

And it’s not just in the US. The Bilderberg Group and its parallel groups, among which are the CFR, the Trilateral Commission (founded by David Rockefeller and Brzezinski), the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) based at Chatham House in London, and their interlocking memberships are at work throughout the Western world and are endeavoring to get their hooks into the rest. The European Union is their baby.

When Bilderberger Margaret Thatcher, the high priestess of privatization, balked on adopting the euro as the UK’s currency, the Bilderbergers had her dumped as prime minister and replaced by John Major.

Like the CFR, which in the course of its history has embraced and financed the Bolsheviks, Communists, Socialists, Nazis and fascists, the Bilderbergers also play all sides. Thus, in 1980, the Bilderbergers decided François Mitterand was to be resurrected and restored to power as France’s next president. After attending the 1999 Bilderberg meeting, Romano Prodi was sworn in as president of Europe in the fall of that year; when his termed ended in 2005, he was elected prime minister of Italy.

Estulin makes it clear that these people will use any means — legal or illegal — in pursuit of their goal of total subjugation to their New World Order or One World Company, as they prefer to call it: wars, coups, assassinations; control of banking, finance, business, the media, education (dumbing down all but an elite needed to run things) and even religion to keep people in check.

He notes that David Rockefeller said in his Memoirs, “Some even believe we are a part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty and I am proud of it.”

Incorporated in this group are the neoconservatives — “those who have determined that Israel’s security should come at the expense of the safety to the United States and be central to all US foreign policy decisions.” Richard Perle is a regular attendee at Bilderberg meetings. Michael Ledeen attended the 2005 meeting.

Media moguls such as Rupert Murdock, the now disgraced Conrad Black, Viacom (parent company of CBS) CEO Sumner Redstone, the Washington Post’s Katherine Graham (now deceased), Washington Post columnists Jim Hoagland and Charles Krauthammer, New York Times Editor Arthur Sulzberger and columnist Thomas L. Friedman, William F. Buckley, Jr., and Bill Moyers have all been Bilderberg meeting invitees.

“The ideas and policies that come out of the Bilderberg annual meetings are used to generate the news in the leading periodicals and news groups of the world. The point is to make the prevalent opinions of the Bilderbergers so appealing that they become public policy and to pressure world leaders unto submitting to the ‘needs of the Masters of the Universe.’ The ‘free world press’ is completely at the mercy of the Bilderbergers disseminating the agreed upon propaganda,” Estulin points out.

This is just a smattering of the information Estulin has managed to pack into his well-written 340-page book, complete with photographs, documents and an index.

If all this seems far-fetched, look around. America has been stripped of its industrial base. The good jobs have been or are being offshored, while Americans are working harder and longer at service sector jobs for less pay and fewer to no benefits. Americans have been dumbed down in public and private schools, universities and colleges. Their only worth now is as consumers of mainly foreign made goods. They are kept in check by religion, sports, idiotic “reality” TV, video games and anything else that turns off thinking.

Democracy, freedom and national sovereignty are anathema to the wannabe masters of the universe. But the Bilderbergers and their parallel groups and allied think tanks have been working to do away with all three. Elections have been rigged. The US, Canada and Great Britain are on the verge of becoming police states, thanks to the bogus “war on terror” used to pump up people’s fears. All that remains in their grand plan is to replace the last vestiges of sovereign nations with a series of regional unions that they will control via the United Nations, outlawing all nationalism.

But they may have overplayed their hand, as the grand scheme is fraying around the edges. Not all Europeans are ready to surrender their countries’ sovereignty to the EU. Canadians who know more about the plan for a North American Union than Americans are diametrically opposed to it. A revitalized Russia, which has a historical wariness of outsiders, has its own ideas. And despite all the Western investment in China, Beijing is proving to be a problem in its refusal to float the yuan to bail out the financial mess the greedy Bilderberger bankers and financiers have made, which may explain the Carlyle Group’s sale of 9.9 percent of itself to the Chinese as a hoped for hook to bring China to their table.

As the old adage says, knowledge is power, and Daniel Estulin is providing every reader of The True Story of the Bilderberg Group with the knowledge they need to aid in destroying the Bilderbergers’ grand plan by bringing it to the attention of family, friends and colleagues. It is up to us to get this book into as many hands as possible, because Estulin will get no help promoting it from the corporate media.

Collectively, the people hold the power to save themselves and that frightens the Bilderbergers and their cohorts the most. But that power is useless if the people refuse to exercise it or surrender it to those who would enslave us.


The Bilderberg Group – Rulers of the World

“The war is not against Bin Laden. We are the enemy”

Interview with investigator and author, Daniel Estulin, on his book, “The True Story of the Bilderberg Group”

Snowshoefilms series: Daniel Estulin, author of The Bilderberg Group, exposes the men behind the curtain, the “owners” and their scribes and bureaucrats. Though Estulin totally buys into the Bilderberg-orchestrated Peak Oil hoax, he also importantly helps demystify the Bilderbergs. Toronto Oct. 19, 2007.

The ‘post-industrial planet’ (a depopulated world) and how to achieve it is the sub-rosa BB agenda. The BBs own everything, control everything (nearly). Over the past decade, Bilderberg-watcher Daniel Estulin has exposed parts of the hidden agenda and players: who gets to be president or prime minister or head of the World Bank, and when. People who do their dirty work big time, like Philip Zelikow, get invited back again and again. Author Estulin here comments on the Bilderberg “planned wholesale destruction of the planet [which] has to be organized and controlled. If it gets out of control, then suddenly they don’t have their hands on the outcome.” The BBs have all they want and now they want less, less of us.

In early 2007, Daniel Estulin, on Dutch TV, exposed the meeting place and names of the Istanbul Bilderberg get-together. He also exposed the Bilderberg plan of global population reduction (3 billion or so), through mass starvation, diseases, and Peak Oil-induced de-industrialization. That “plan,” Estulin notes, was initiated by Bilderberg operative Henry Kissinger in 1974 (NSSM 200) after Nixon had been forced out the the White House. Estulin says he himself is a front man (the writer and public face) for a group of intelligence agents (mostly ex-KGB) from Estulin’s native Estonia. Part of a family of emigres from the Soviet Union in the mid-1980s, Daniel Estulin first found refuge in Canada. A Flamenco guitarist in addition to Bilderberg slueth, the author lives in Seville, Spain. After 10 years of peripheral intrigue, watching and reporting on the world’s elite (the Owners and their Trusted Servants), Estulin sympathizes with the Bilderberg mantra of ‘Peak Oil’ and the consequent Bilderberg argument for massive population reduction in their effort to bring about a ‘post-industrial world’. Shades of Parson Malthus with a Leo Straussian twist, the BBs.

But wait! Take a gander at Lindsey Williams, on youtube, for starters. Williams was a southern Baptist preacher who reckoned the 25,000 men going up to build the Alaska pipeline needed Jesus. He got hired on in 1970 as Arco’s chaplain. The public relations office saw what a good job he was doing, flying around from camp to camp, preaching Jesus (less fights, less drinking, fewer days off, less need of counseling for the thousands of men building the pipeline). ARCO gave Baptist preacher Rev. Lindsey Williams executive status, inviting him to sit in on board meetings. Rev. Williams did this for three years. And he sat in on the euphoric 1973 ARCO board meeting announcing an enormous North Shore oil discovery. All the gears were in motion to tell the world. Rev. Williams videos and book tell what happened. But, an addendum: just a cursory look suggests that plugging the Alaskan ARCO coincides with the heavy-duty moves to implement the Bilderberg plan (see NSSM 200, above).

Bilderberg sleuth and best-selling author Estulin provides a photo review of some Bilderbergers (et al), past and present, with comment on the ‘Muslim threat’ (nonsense, a Big Lie), the UN (under the control of the BBs & the world’s self-appointed elite), Noam Chomsky (left gatekeeper), Putin (wants what’s Russia’s for Russia), depleted uranium (one of the [BB’s] ways of getting rid of populations). Peak Oil is Malthus’s wet dream. Capitalism’s 1st Shill was Parson Malthus. The photo of the Three Monkeys criminals photo (‘Hear No Evil, See No Evil, Speak No Evil’) Sec. of State Madeleine Albright, Sec. of Defense William Cohen and Bilderberg wonderboy Bill Clinton is illustrative of their contempt. For Canadians, boycott Chapters, and Indigo Books (it aint much, but it’s a start).



The Nazi Prince and founder of the Bilderberg

Bilderberg and the New World Order



Conspiracies and Underdogs

Chosen people or Ziodrek~a photoessay

Chosen People

History repeating itself?

The ‘Salvation Army’?

Show me Palestine on the map and we’re outta here…..

Never again???

Say what????
Humiliation? You ain’t seen nothing yet…..

All brought to you by the USA via AIPAC….


Crime-Busters Turned Snoopers

A team of research analysts at Syracuse University has been tracking the FBI’s activity in domestic crime investigations. The results are revealing.

For example, in 2007, the FBI made 2,300 referrals of cases to be prosecuted to the U.S. Justice Department. In 1993, the FBI made 20,900 such referrals.

Two decades ago, FBI investigations contributed 36 percent of the total cases prosecuted by the Justice Department. Last year, the FBI referrals were down to 16 percent.

So, if FBI agents aren’t investigating crime in the United States, what are they doing? Ferreting out terrorists, apparently, and invading your privacy in the process.

Internal audits indicate the FBI has continued, and even expanded, its pursuit of information on American citizens – made possible by the Patriot Act – although it was ordered by a federal judge last year to cease and desist.

The judge’s ruling came after testimony that the FBI had issued more than 140,000 “national security letters” in the period from the beginning of 2003 through 2005. In his ruling, the federal judge called such snooping the “legislative equivalent of breaking and entering.”

So, in the opinion of at least one judge, instead of solving crime and helping to put criminals behind bars, the FBI has instead focused its energies on violating the privacy rights of U.S. citizens.

Those national security letters allow the FBI to comb through phone, Internet and bank records in an effort to thwart terrorism. It seems highly unlikely that there are many terrorists, or U.S. citizens with connections to terrorist groups, among the hundreds of thousands of citizens whose lives have now been pried into by the FBI.

FBI officials admitted last week that the federal judge’s order to stop snooping, or at least slow the pace, had basically been ignored. The bureau apparently continues to eavesdrop.

The mental image is inescapable – the United States as become a nation of frightened people, cowering in a corner, giving up all semblance of privacy and civil freedoms in an effort to keep from being terrorized.

At least that’s the image the Bush administration fosters in its relentless, unending search for the evildoers of the world.


Feds attack *peaceful assembly* in Wyoming

Since 1972, the Rainbow Family have been gathering every summer at national parks to pray for the earth and to enjoy spiritual fellowship with other members.  Due to recent legislation passed earlier this year and 36 years after the fact the Rainbow gatherings are, now, illegal according to the law.

Watching the two-part National Rainbow Gathering 2008 I cannot imagine what law enforcement considers illegal.  Basically, these are 21st century peaceful, nature loving hippies who just want to celebrate nature.

National Rainbow Gathering 2008 – Part 1

National Rainbow Gathering 2008 – Part 2

The Wyoming Feds wasted no time attacking the peaceful assembly and were looking for any excuse to taser and arrest people as witnessed in the next video –

Law enforcment officers attacked a rainbow gathering campsite with paintball guns and pepperspray. the camp was filled with children and some were hit and peopole were arrested for no reason.

At the 2008 Rainbow Gathering, this brother was detained by law enforcement for “stating words likely to incite lawlessness”.

We were attending the 2008 Gathering in Wyoming – staying in Kiddie Village. During the pre-dinner prayer circle I noticed Sherriffs sprinkled through the woods between us and dinner. They arrested a mother and attempted to take custody of a child. We reacted nonviolently however this was what happenned. More to come later – Shot by Linnea Dahl

Alex Jones welcomes Rob Savoy of the Rainbow Family. The Rainbow Family are a loosely affiliated group of individuals committed to principles of non-violence and non-hierarchical egalitarianism who meet in a forest each year. During this year’s meeting, feds assaulted, Tasered and arrested five members of the group for the crime of having an “unregistered gathering”.  Part 1 of 4.

To all the Rip Van Winkle Americans: the crackdown on our civil liberties and freedoms took an unbelievable hit last week as you have just witnessed with the Rainbow Family.  The state and its right arm – law enforcement entities, are exercising their newest powers to attack the people.  There were thousands of Americans at the Rainbow Family Gathering and this is why they were attacked.  People with like minds gathering together is something that they can no longer allow because they are afraid that, eventually, Americans will form even larger coalitions that will plan and institute their demise.

Prominent Doctors asks Tennessee Govenor to stop *fluoridating* state water supply

FISA ‘compromise’ completes transformation of US into full police state

Between the false flag mass murder of 9/11 and the creation of the “war on terrorism,” the USAPATRIOT Act and this new FISA revision, the Bush-Cheney administration and its enthusiastically complicit congressional partners have achieved total victory — world war, open criminality, and the end of law itself.

Larry Chin
Online Journal
July 12, 2008

On Wednesday, the US Congress overwhelmingly passed legislation permitting government spying, including giving immunity to telecommunications companies involved in secret domestic surveillance programs. With the stroke of George W. Bush’s pen, the US is now a police state by definition.

The extent of the spying program, and its larger implications, have been revealed by Mark Klein, who blew the whistle on secret domestic spying program of Bush/Cheney’s National Security Agency (NSA) and AT&T: AT&T whistleblower: spy bill creates infrastructure for police state

The update of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, called the “FISA compromise,” or more appropriately, the “spy bill,” largely completes the triumph of the Bush/Cheney administration and a bipartisan criminal consensus. By convenient design, the FISA revision derails pending lawsuits filed against the Bush administration’s corporate spying partners (AT&T, Sprint Nextel, and Verizon), silences (the largely empty-to-begin-with) congressional investigations into the Bush administration’s illegal domestic spying program.

Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama and the Democrats have now moved to silence all discussion about the issue.

Fear itself, a.k.a. spying itself

Between the false flag mass murder of 9/11 and the creation of the “war on terrorism,” the USAPATRIOT Act and this new FISA revision, the Bush-Cheney administration and its enthusiastically complicit congressional partners have achieved total victory — world war, open criminality, and the end of law itself.

It gives the US government unprecedented new spying powers and sweeping new legal cover for spying that goes well beyond even the original FISA law — which itself was an abomination that already permitted the US president broad surveillance powers.

Given the fact that the US government is a wholly corrupted criminal organization by definition, the political spin over “oversight,” warrants, the involvement of the inspector general, etc., is all the more transparently ridiculous: the operatives of such apparatuses do not investigate or punish their own. Nor do they voluntarily stop the lucrative and intoxicating criminal activity that is their lifeblood.

In fact, the debate over the spy bill is a red herring, clouding the larger central (purposely unaddressed) issue: the “war on terrorism” lie itself.

The mass murder of 9/11 was a false flag operation, orchestrated and executed by the Bush administration. The “war on terrorism” is a perpetual covert operation, an endless pretext for war and murder, supported by a bipartisan consensus. (See Who is Osama bin Laden? and Al-Qaeda:the database.) No 9/11, no “war on terrorism,” no war in the Middle East. No “war on terrorism” lie, no dictatorial powers for the White House, and no beefed-up FISA.

Given that the “war on terrorism” is a lie, the need for unprecedented spying is also a lie. Just as 9/11 remains the endless pretext for endless war and terrorism, it also remains, in its countless propaganda manifestations, the justification for open totalitarian rule of force and intimidation within US borders.

The totalitarian criminal agenda is fully endorsed by neoliberal Democrats, including Barack Obama. According to the Obama campaign, “Senator Obama has said before that the compromise bill is not perfect. Given the choice between voting for an improved yet imperfect bill, and losing important surveillance tools, Senator Obama chose to support the FISA compromise.”

The pro-surveillance Democrats, led by Senator Jay Rockefeller and Obama (whose lame hemming-hawing justifications can be read here) are repeating asinine lies, and groundless excuses.

In calling criminal spying and covert operations “important surveillance tools,” Obama is showing his truest colors. Obama, whose politics and rhetoric have been consistently in line with the Bush/Cheney agenda on all of the most telling issues (war in Afghanistan, war on Iran, “terrorism,” “homeland security,” globalization, and most recently, other right-wing positions), is a smooth-talking and appealing front for the Bush-Cheney status quo. Obama and McCain, like Bush-Cheney, will continue to push the endless “war on terrorism” lie, and embrace every single criminal act conducted in the name of this propaganda construct.

All “homeland security”/Big Brother measures such as FISA, in any form, provides political cover for the US government to engage in criminal activity. Any politician, be it Bush/Cheney or Obama, who approves of any sort of “surveillance” is guilty of committing a criminal act, and of raping the Constitution along the way.

Cynical posturing and election-year flatulence from Obama’s legion of defenders and fans cannot hide what has happened, or who is responsible. The rape of the US Constitution is so overt and so egregious that it has set off a wave of outrage and backlash, spawning unusual new grassroots coalitions.

Clearly, however, the powers that be, including the Obama camp, have casually dismissed this relatively small portion of the US public out of its election-year calculations, regardless of how stridently they organize, blog, blow whistles or file lawsuits.

Senator Russ Feingold (whose own record on opposing the Bush administration is less than stellar) warned that the FISA revision “could mean millions upon millions of communications between innocent Americans and their friends, families or business associates overseas could now be legally collected.”

It means much more than Feingold states, and it has for many years — perhaps decades.

Spying: the pre- and post-9/11 norm

Returning again to the exposé by whistleblower Mark Klein, his detailed and stomach-turning exposé, which includes materials from the key court cases, exposes the fact that the NSA began breaking into local telephone circuits in 2001. As pointed out by Robert Parry, the current program may have been in place before 2001.

In other words, the spying program never had anything to do with international “terrorists,” and everything to do with a larger police state agenda, including the power to identify, designate and destroy individuals whose opinions run counter to those of whichever Big Brother is “in charge.” This is a long-planned program that 9/11 allowed to push to full fruition.

It is a well-documented fact that the US government’s spying capabilities are overwhelming, and that continuous illegal surveillance has always trumped congressional oversight, and the law itself. Obviously, the light reigning-in of criminal covert operations in the post-Watergate 1970s has been completely undone in the decades since.

Investigators such as former NSA operative James Bamford (author of the exposé of the NSA, Body of Secrets) and Mike Ruppert’s Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil have thoroughly detailed the pervasiveness and effectiveness of a wide range of spying and intelligence programs used by intelligence and law enforcement agencies. These include Echelon and PROMIS, which are used by operatives in criminal fashion, as ordered by high-level officials, specifically to get around all oversight.

Completely unaddressed throughout the years of noise over spying and FISA, the Total Information Awareness Program (formerly known as DARPA, and spearheaded by Iran-Contra participant John Poindexter) has found new life as the IARPA program.

Nobody is talking about IARPA. Nobody will.

Welcome to hell, again

The George W. Bush administration seized the White House in 2000 by way of an openly stolen election, then cemented its criminal power into place with the unprecedented 9/11 mass murder, and its two resulting abominations: the fabricated “war on terrorism” (the pretext for endless global war), and the USAPATRIOT Act (the full-scale destruction of the Constitution, and the militarization of the US homeland).

These continuing atrocities were the works of a bipartisan “war on terrorism” consensus, a full partnership at the top echelons, whose overriding agenda is the survival of the criminal racket known as the Anglo-American empire.

The deepening of the war and security state has continued unabated. Under a US Congress with a Democratic Party majority, nothing been done to stop, reverse or undo the world war, boundless US government criminality, open corruption, or the absolute and systematic rape of law itself. Now, particularly with a looming US presidential election, leading members of both political parties have shown their true colors: as flagrant proponents of military-intelligence/“homeland security,” and enthusiastic destroyers of the Constitution.

In The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence, Victor Marchetti and John Marks wrote in 1974, “The clandestine mentality is a mind-set that thrives on secrecy and deception. It encourages professional amorality—the belief that righteous goals can be achieved through the use of unprincipled and normally unacceptable means . . .”

Today, exemplified by actions of the bipartisan US consensus, assisted by an acquiescent and dumbed-down populace, the clandestine mentality is not clandestine. “Professional amorality” is the norm—celebrated openly, and opposed by few.

In other words, your life and all of your communications — from your emails, your web searches, medical records, and financial information, to your reading this article and clicking this web site — has been “hoovered up” by the US government’s spying machine, to be used against you at some future time, if the powers that be so choose.

If 9/11, the USAPATRIOT Act, and the relentless destruction of law since 2000 have not already made it abundantly clear, a “Homeland Security” police state within US borders, courtesy of the spy bill, is now complete. Not even the trappings of a democracy remain.


Peter Schaenk tells it like it is!

Normally calm and reserved Schaenk gives a riveting rant on 9/11, the perpetrators directly responsible and on those in the mainstream that continue to suppress the truth at every turn and those ordinary Americans that don’t want to know the truth because they are afraid that it may require them to leave “Dancing With the Stars” and get up and DO SOMETHING.

Website: Shank News Worldwide


Photo of the Day #3 – Was it ever this low?


You might remember when this accident happened 8 years ago this March. This Southwest Airlines

flight from Vegas overshot the runway at Burbank.

The plane smashed past the airport fence, careened across the street and ended up

with a collapsed landing gear, right next to a  gas station.

But that’s not the amazing part!!!

UPDATE: ‘New World Order’ being driven by Jewish Messianism

What Every Jew (And Non-Jew) Should Know

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

A Chicago-area scholar, Christopher Jon Bjerknes, 42, thinks he knows what plagues mankind and believes his knowledge is necessary to stop Armageddon.

He says a heretical cult, the “Shabataian Frankists,” controls organized Jewry, including Zionism and Freemasonry. They began as followers of Shabatai Zvi (1626-1676) and later Jacob Frank (1726-1791.) They believe Shabatai was the Messiah (God) and his soul has transmigrated down to the Rothschild dynasty, who are now the “king of the Jews.”

According to their messianic system, Redemption requires that the Rothschilds become God, i.e. king of the world. This will see the sacrifice of 2/3 of all Jews and the destruction and enslavement of the rest of mankind. Bjerknes believes this demented creed actually is the motive force behind history, including all wars, and world government.

Bjerknes (B-YERK-NES) is proud of his Norwegian Jewish heritage, (his maternal grandfather, a famous musician, was Jewish.) He has written two massive books– one about Albert Einstein as a plagiarist, and another about the Shabataian inspired Armenian Genocide — that include hundreds of pages of suppressed Jewish history. They can be found as PDFs at his web site http://

I think he exaggerates the importance of Jewish messianism but I may be wrong. His message is compelling and consistent with the Protocols of Zion where the author (whom I believe is Lionel Rothschild) talks about coming into his “kingdom.”

The Shabataians believe their king is duty bound to restore the Jews to Israel and exterminate the Gentiles. They believe the Messiah won’t appear until the world succumbs to evil and are determined to make this prophecy self-fulfilling. Thus evil is good. In Bjerknes’ view, this constitutes a “Jewish war against humanity.” When Bjerknes refers to Jewish, he means “Shabataian.”

The Shabataians are often sexual degenerates who engage in wife swapping, orgies and incest. They often pretend to be Christians or Moslems to worm their way into Gentile society in order to destroy it. (“Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians,” pp.64-65.)

Bjerknes cites Deuteronomy as an example of this Jewish supremacism: “the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth. ” (7-16) “And all people of the earth shall see that thou art called by the name of the LORD; and they shall be afraid of you.” (28:10)

He points to Zachariah [13;8-9] as evidence that 2/3 of all Jews will be slaughtered: “And it shall come to pass, that in all the land, saith the LORD, two parts therein shall be cut off and die; but the third shall be left therein.”

[9] “And I will bring the third part through the fire, and will refine them as silver is refined, and will try them as gold is tried: they shall call on my name, and I will hear them: I will say, It is my people: and they shall say, The LORD is my God.” (He also cites Ezekiel 5:12-13 to this effect.)

On pp. 43-46 of “Jewish Genocide”, Bjerknes cites references from the Talmud and the Old Testament to the extermination and enslavement of Gentiles.

For example ,Genesis 25;23, and 27;38-41 promises the Gentiles to the Jews as their slaves and slave soldiers, and gives an incentive to exterminate the Gentiles simply because they dare resent their fate.


At the beginning of the 19th century the Rothschilds started campaigning to return the Jews to Israel, purchasing land there and scheming to breakup the Ottoman Empire. They later bought the Suez Canal to project their power into the Middle East. Bjerknes writes:

“The ruin of the Turkish Empire and the mass murder of the Armenian Christians were one step on the long and tumultuous Jewish march toward the death of mankind. The ruin of the Russian empire was another, followed by the repeated destruction of Europe, particularly Germany in the World Wars this Jewish cult created in an attempt to artificially fulfill Messianic prophecy and force the Jews of Europe against their will to flee to Palestine.” (66)

According to Bjerknes, Jewish support was the only thing lacking in the the Rothschilds’ plan to establish a world government in Jerusalem, with them as king:

“They could bankrupt Egypt and Turkey. They could bring Russia to ruins. They could buy Jewish ne’er-do-wells. They could even buy the Pope but the only way to force Jews in large numbers to Palestine was to put Hitler and Stalin in power and persecute Jews on a massive and unprecedented scale.” (291)


Bjerknes has a poignant warning to Christians:

“In the Jewish dominated media of today, we find many Jews preaching to the public that the end times are coming and that Christians ought to view their own destruction in a positive light as if it were the divine fulfillment of Christian and Jewish prophecy. Many Christians have been duped by these charlatan…the destruction of the world and its nations is occurring as the result of the deliberate intervention of immensely wealthy Jews and not as the result of God’s will. These Jewish leaders view the Hebrew Bible as a plan, which they are deliberately fulfilling…. (327)


As my readers know I see the New World Order as an elite conspiracy driven primarily by the central bankers’ need to consolidate their monopoly on credit and power. I believe there is a strong “Jewish” element but that they have co-opted all gentile elites using intermarriage, Freemasonry (run by the Illuminati), and Aryanism. Look at the Gentile membership of the Illuminati Skull and Bones for example. Bjerknes doesn’t think the Illuminati is still in business and downplays the Gentile role.

In an email, Bjerknes writes that intermarriage is part of the “Jewish” strategy:

“I believe that powerful Jewish interests have been deliberately attempting to fulfill Jewish messianic prophecy for 2,500 years and have duped many Gentiles into helping them obtain their objectives. They have also recruited many Gentiles through intermarriage, friendship and selfish interests, who are not dupes, but commit inhuman acts out of greed, vanity, or for other immoral reasons. Do they believe that what they are doing is evil? I suspect some do.

I am not opposed to identifying secret societies and the ties among the elite. I simply do not see any justification for calling them Illuminati. As for the overall path of politics and the faces of those who are pushing the cart toward WW III, I think I and countless others have proven that it is a Jewish movement, and that the Illuminati were nothing but a small part of this Jewish movement to gin up an apocalypse, which dates back at least 2,500 years. Of course not everything happening today has a Jewish hand steering its course. But I do believe that powerful Jewish interests …have the ability to exert more influence than all other groups combined, for the very reason that they have infiltrated so many organizations, religions and governments, and have such disproportionate influence in the media.”


I wouldn’t be presenting Bjerknes’ argument if I didn’t agree that it is important to examine Jewish messianism. If world events indeed are driven by the Rothschild’s megalomania propped up by Shabataian, Old Testament and Talmudic fanaticism, I think Jews and non-Jews alike would want to know, and take exception.

Certainly the role of Jewish Rothschild agents in advocating for the Iraq war and an attack on Iran is consistent with the profile above.

If Bjerknes is right, “anti-Semitism” is exposed as psychological warfare designed to disarm opposition to an insidious tyranny by portraying it as racist. It is also used to manipulate Jews who have been opposed to the Rothschild’s insane agenda, and victims of it.

Related: Hitler Used Rothschild Banker’s Typewriter for “Mein Kampf”

Henry Makow Ph.D. is the inventor of the game Scruples and author of “A Long Way to go for a Date.” His articles exposing fe-manism and the New World Order can be found at his web site He enjoys receiving comments, some of which he posts on his site using first names only.


The Rothschild Dynasty and The Worldwide Conspiracy

The History of the House of Rothschild

Did Rothschild Write The Protocols?

The Roots of Evil in Jerusalem (A must for every Jew)

Henry Makow interviews Christopher Jon Bjerknes: Henry Makow and Bjerknes discuss the Judaist powers and theological concepts behind the “New World Order”, their methods, means and objectives.

Christopher Jon Bjerknes with Henry Makow, RBN, May 11, 2008 and {from 58:28} November 23, 2008.


Bohemian Grove kicks off tonight

Bush, McCain & Obama To Visit Bohemian Grove?

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, July 11, 2008

Outgoing President George W. Bush and both of his presumptive replacements John McCain and Barack Obama are rumored to be in attendance at this year’s Bohemian Grove gathering, an annual get-together of the global elite staged inside a sprawling forest encampment which kicks off tonight and runs until July 27.

Bohemian Grove is a 136-year-old all-male encampment complete with restaurants, bars, stages and lodges, which caters to around 2,000 members of the global elite along with Californian hoi polloi on a yearly basis in July. The camp is set within a 2,700 acre secluded forest replete with giant redwood trees.

Former attendees include Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon, who both went on to become President, as well as regulars like Henry Kissinger, Alan Greenspan, David Rockefeller, Colin Powell, as well as George W. Bush and his father.

In 2000 radio host and film maker Alex Jones infiltrated the gathering and caught exclusive video footage of a bizarre mock human sacrifice ritual, known as “the cremation of care”, under a 40 foot stone owl that the members refer to as Molech.

Attendees dress up like Klan members in hooded robes and perform druidic pagan ceremonies to mark the spectacular finale of the event.

In 2004, The New York Post reported that top gay porn star Chad Savage was hired by the Grove to “service” its members during the event and “attend to their every need”.

“When they’re not listening to policy speeches, “Bohos” are known to urinate freely in the redwoods and perform mock-druidic rituals that revolve around a 40-foot-tall stone owl. In one ritual, called “Cremation of Care,” members wearing red-hooded robes cremate a coffin effigy of “Dull Care” at the base of the owl altar,” the report stated.

Alex Jones discusses the shocking footage he obtained during his 2000 infiltration of the Grove.

Homosexual orgies are known to be part of the festivities enjoyed by the predominately “Christian conservative” leaders who go there. Former attendee Richard Nixon once referred to the Grove as, “the most faggy goddamned thing you could ever imagine.”

A reader who got a summer job working at the Grove in 2005, Chris Jones, told us that he was regularly propositioned for sex by the old men attending the encampment and asked if he “slept around” and wanted to have some fun.

Jones was later sentenced to three years in jail by California authorities for simply showing a tape of his visit to minors.

However, the media’s attitude to hundreds of powerbrokers attending an event at which the Manhattan Project was known to have been born, while frolicking around dressed up as women pissing up trees and having gay sex, has been sophomoric to say the least.

One such hit piece in the Sacramento News & Review, which ties the Grove as well as public organizations such as the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission with shape-shifting reptoid conspiracies, is useful for only one piece of information – the claim that Presidential hopeful John McCain may be attending this year’s gathering.

George W. Bush and his father give a lakeside talk at Bohemian Grove in this photo from the Grove’s annual yearbook.

In addition, according to an Arizona Daily Star report about a different subject, President Bush’s schedule for next week has not been released, meaning Bush, a regular attendee with his father to Bohemian Grove in past years, could be set to make a visit at some point to mark the last year of his presidency.

Tellingly, both McCain and Democratic candidate Barack Obama will be in California from Saturday to Tuesday, during which time both candidates are scheduled to speak at the National Council of La Raza, a racist Mexican separatist group that advocates a violent overthrow of the southwestern U.S. states.

Their schedule puts them in the perfect location to enjoy a night at the Grove this weekend.

Two years ago we were able to accurately surmise then British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s visit to the Grove, which coincided with a visit to San Francisco where he met with powerbrokers.

Thus far, there has only been one other mainstream report concerning the event, an article entitled Power brokers due at Bohemian Grove, appearing in the Santa Rosa Press Democrat, a local paper that routinely covers the gathering.

“Critics, who until recent years mounted protests outside its gates, say the gatherings serve as strategy sessions for a New World Order operating outside democratic institutions,” states the article.

“Most critics raise the specter of national policy with global implications coming from behind the gates of an exclusive, closed-door gathering of largely conservative, wealthy white men.”


The Dialectical Nature of the Farce Called Politics

The dog and pony show called politics should show itself as being the sham it truly is more than ever before. However, this is not the case for many people. The public is made to believe that this laughable charade is real, when it is a smoke and mirrors illusion controlled by the few behind the proverbial curtain, who control both sides of the political spectrum to foment divide & conquer.

Copious amounts of sports and mindless entertainment have played a crucial role in blurring people’s sense of what is real and what isn’t, creating a society that can be perfectly molded according to its controllers’ plans. As it is, most people are living a fantasy and playing a role, where they are content parroting whatever they’ve heard on TV while they pretend they’re living the lives of their favorite actor or actress. Why do you think so many people try so hard to look and act like the people seen on TV?

If people themselves are not who they really are — and in most cases they don’t even know who they are — then how are they going to tell when they’re being lied to by parasitic politicians, who themselves are nothing more than actors/actresses and professional liars? These phonies can stand in front of huge crowds of gullible people and say whatever it is they think these people want to hear, only to lead them in the exact opposite direction they promised once they’re put in office to carry out the agenda of their masters.

Americans went to the polls in ’06 to vote in the Democrats, only to see a continuation of the same policies put forward by their Republican counterparts. This is because no matter who is in office, they’re all put there to read off the same script, written by the same few men at the top, who work through a network of unelected bureaucracies and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), such as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission, and the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA).

Politics is, and always has been, the illusionary sham designed for the “little people” at the bottom to believe and partake in. Those at the top don’t follow politics, which to them is nothing more than a control mechanism that they control for their own ends.

A public that believes it has a say in its own destiny within the system — that in reality only serves to manage and control them — is never going rebel against that system. So, in reality, what the people call “democracy” is really just a scientifically-created way of enslaving the public so they only imagine they have a say in their destiny. These people are experts on how the human mind works and can be manipulated to believe whatever the controllers want.While the media’s emphasis is on politicians and their respective parties, no attention is given to the NGOs these people are members of, such as the CFR, which is the real policy making arm of this country and features members of both parties. In reality, the CFR is merely the stateside branch of an organization that was established in England in 1920, out of the Rhodes Round Table groups, called the Royal Institute for International Affairs (aka Chatham House).

Hince their outset, the aim of these groups has been to establish British rule across the entire planet (i.e. a one world government). It makes sense that the American media rarely makes mention of these groups or their members, because the media in the United States is controlled by the CFR. The editors and even many of the journalists (as well as the majority of the board of directors) of the biggest media outlets in the US are members of the CFR. Almost every president since its inception in 1921, save for a small few, has been a member of this organization, which includes academics, cultural figures, political figures, media figures, and members of the board of directors of some the biggest US and transnational corporations.

The remaining two candidates running for the Democratic ticket in ’08 (Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama), as well as the two “frontrunners” on the Republican side (John McCain and Mitt Romney), are members of the CFR. Republican candidate Mike Huckabee was considered a longshot for the presidency when the race began, but after addressing the CFR in September, he quickly emerged as a frontrunner. CFR president Richard Haas is now an advisor to the Huckabee campaign. Go figure.Carroll Quigley, a former CFR archivist and mentor to Bill Clinton at Georgetown, who selected Clinton for the Rhodes Scholarship in 1968, once stated:

“The CFR is the American Branch of a society which originated in England, and which believes that national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established.”

Regarding the two-party system, on pp. 1247-8 of Tragedy & Hope (1966), Quigley states:

“The chief problem of American political life for a long time has been how to make the two Congressional parties more national and international. The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead the two parties should be almost identical, so the that American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.”

For more info on Quigley, check out my 6 minute video,
This video highlights some of the more important quotes and passages taken from the books of former CFR archivist, Georgetown professor and Bill Clinton mentor, Carroll Quigley.This includes passages from ‘Tragedy and Hope’ (1966), as well as ‘The Anglo-American Establishment’ (1982). The books provide a look into the inner workings of the elite bureaucracies that run the world today, from one of the conspirators themselves. This video is an excellent start for those unfamiliar with Quigley and are just waking up to the agenda, as these are irrefutable quotes from an insider and undeniable proofs of a massive, longstanding conspiracy against the people, not only of the US, but the entire world.

Left wing or Right wing, these are merely two wings belonging to the same bird — two sides of the same coin. This is the dialectic nature by which the system we are living under operates, and is aimed at creating a desired outcome, or, synthesis. This method of covert domination can be seen all throughout history, and a good example would be the first two world wars. While the public is lead to believe that these wars were merely the result of unrelated and spontaneous uprisings, quite a different picture is painted when you delve into the true history that has been suppressed from the general public, which shows that both sides of these wars were being funded by the same few families behind the scenes — namely the Rothschild and Rockefeller families.

The real purpose of these wars was primarily psychological, and was aimed at breaking people emotionally through political and economic turmoil, so they would accept the loss of their national sovereignty to a global body whose purpose we were told was to ensure that such wars would never happen again. This began with the failed League of Nations, which was established in 1919 and was the outcome of the Paris Peace Conference and the resulting Treaty of Versailles. The Elite knew that the first war wouldn’t be enough to create the desired psychological breakdown in the people, and that a second world war would be needed to create the pretext and mindset for a truly global body, which was established with the creation of the United Nations in 1945.Despite the fact that nothing changes, regardless of which party or person is in office, the public can still be expected to go to the polls in November to pull the lever for their puppet of choice, believing that they have a say when they have anything but. This system is run by Fabian socialism, which unlike revolutionary socialism is done through incrementalism and stealth. Lenin once stated that communism is merely socialism in a hurry. This is the doctrine of both political parties. While the Democrats tend to be more openly socialistic, the Republicans prefer to hide this under the guise of nationalism and a “strong national defense” (i.e. imperialistic war-mongering).

If you look at the candidates on both sides, you will see they are essentially the same. It’s just that one side speaks more openly in support of war, while the other side pretends to be against it though they’re every bit the war-mongers as their presumed “opposites.” Social issues such as abortion and “gay rights,” coupled with religion, are also used as smoke screens, to get the public to think the parties are different when in fact they are pushing the same exact globalist agenda entailing more big brother control over the people they present themselves as saviors to.I have always found it amusing that many people staunchly opposed to the current administration, speak highly about the days when Bill Clinton was in office, as if Clinton is any less the globalist NWO puppet that Bush is. (After all, it was Clinton that gave us NAFTA, the precursor to the coming North American Union.) These people are all torn from the same cloth and are put into power to serve the same few men at the top. When the public gets sick of one party, they simply “throw the rascals out” and put the other one in, only to carry out almost the exact same policies. This was admitted by Carroll Quigley in an above quote.

The unelected technocrats really running the show never leave office, no matter who is presented to the public as being the “leader,” and it’s these technocrats who set policy from behind the facade of partisan politics they control. How many people know that Daddy Bush and Bill Clinton are close friends going back decades, and that, in the mid-1980s they both oversaw a massive CIA cocaine-smuggling operation out of Mena, Arkansas, where Clinton was governor at the time? This was well-documented in the book titled Compromised: Clinton, Bush and the CIA (1994) by Terry Reid, a former member of Air Force Intelligence, who witnessed this complicity firsthand.If Hillary wins the upcoming nomination and the ensuing presidential election in November — and it’s likely she will, as it is clear that she is the anointed one — it will represent 32 years of Bush-Clinton dynasty, considering that Bush sr. ran the administration of the senile puppet Ronald Reagan.

From these empty suits and turncoats we call politicians and our “elected leaders,” we hear the same empty platitudes about so-called “change.” But what change are they referring to and what is the real reason for this change? Nobody asks themselves what this change entails or if it even benefits them. We are conditioned to think that we are simply progressing and evolving as time goes on, as if this is happening naturally.

The fact is, we have been guided to where we are today by a religion that is striving toward the implementation of what they call the “Great Work.” This will entail not only a completely controlled and scientifically managed society, but a much smaller one where people are unable to think for themselves. This will also entail a society where humans are purpose-bred, as was seen in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World.

If you look at where we are today, the Elite are really already halfway there with an unquestioning, apathetic public they see as cattle and refer to as “the profane,” “useless eaters” and “unwashed masses.” What is now done through propaganda and indoctrination will someday soon be done through technological means, by what is called transhumanism, or the merger of man with computers via an implanted brain chip already in production and ready to go. This is what Zbigniew Brzezinski referred to in his book, entitled Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era (1970), where he stated:

“The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.”

In order for this agenda to be stopped in its tracks, it would require enough people ridding themselves of their indoctrinated beliefs about how the system is run. It would first entail people looking within themselves, understanding their own role within the matrix. Everything that is presented at face value is there for a reason, and nothing is ever as it appears. There is no battle of Left vs. Right, Democrat vs. Republican, Capitalism vs. Socialism, White vs. Black, Muslims vs. Westerners, etc.. These are all manufactured “sides” and simply the way in which dialectics (force vs. counter-force) are used, pitting opposites against one another to create a desired outcome (reconciliation). The real war is not between manufactured groups or “sides,” all of which are part of the same hydra head.

The real war is between us (humanity) and them (the Elite). It’s time people stop joining sides and established groups that only pretend to represent them, and come together as sentient individuals.

Jewish Gun Grabbers

by Curt Maynard

It is clear from historical records and present conditions that crime and tyranny increase with the decrease in a citizens right to keep and bare arms. There is no force greater in the United States that wishes to disarm us than the criminal Jewish Mafia.

When you’re in their sights

The terrifying moment armed police held down an innocent man on train and put a gun to his head

Luke Salkeld / UK Daily Mail | July 7, 2008

Guns pointing at his head, a train passenger is forced to lie face-down on the platform in a dramatic police swoop.

Officers then dragged him to his feet and frogmarched him away to be searched and interrogated.

Minutes later, however, he was released without charge after it became clear that they had seized entirely the wrong man.


Chemtrail Assault on Americans

In my last alert, I sent out this very alarming article:

The Air Force Wants Your LOV: Aerial Seeding of Biological Implants into Food, Water, & Air

In this alert, I am providing solutions– information that can help protect us from the chemtrail microchipping of our bodies. Countermeasures which we must all implement, and compare notes on.

If I flat out told you that you had at least 4 different pathogens growing in your body right now which are reassembling in the body to turn into nanomachines which are internally microchipping you, making your whole body one big antenna so you can be easily manipulated and controlled by the ruling elite via high tech mind control technology intended to turn this into a prison planet, would you believe me?

We all have these pathogens in us right now, even if we don’t have any of the outward signs of Morgellons, which is not an actual disease – its actually the result of biological warfare being waged against us right now via chemtrails being sprayed on us from planes. We’re breathing these nano particles, they’re in our water and in the food chain.

In the words of Gwen Scott, ND regarding Morgellons: I must say, in my opinion, it’s not really a disease in the traditional sense. It is not measles or mumps. It doesn’t run a finite course nor is it exclusive to contact with other humans. What we are looking at here is an inorganic fiber and other components delivered through the air supply. In my opinion, what we are really looking at is a progressive “system” or “syndrome” in which “Morgellons” is just the latest and most visible aspect.”


Morgellons, Pathogens and the General Population by Clifford Carnicom

Morgellons- the Wine/ Peroxide Test by Clifford Carnicom

Morgellons- A Natural Medicine Approach by Gwen Scott, ND

In this last article, Gwen Scott discusses the specific things she’s been doing to kill these pathogens which we’re being shown how to test for.

Chemtrails contain heavy metals like barium and aluminum. We can eliminate them via diatomaceous earth. They also contain these nanoparticles which are engineered in a lab to grow in our bodies into nanomachines which act like microchips, so our bodies will become like antennas for directed energy via which the ruling elite intend to control us. I realize all of this sounds like something from the “X Files” but this is real life, this is happening to ALL of us on the IAHF list, world wide,

Gwen Scott, who suffered from chronic fatigue caused by chemtrails- says she first addressed parasites at the beginning of her efforts to cleanse. She used herbs such as
Wormwoood, Black Walnut and Cloves as the remedy for parasite cleansing. It is a 11 week detox while using it actively for 8 weeks. A Naturopath on the IAHF list emailed me saying she prefers using a tincture- simply add to water for each dose and can easily adjust dose for children and pets. Clarkia is brand that can be purchased, link explains the order detox programs should be completed with detailed information.Gwen Scott then discusses one multi herbal product that she discovered called “Deep Health” made by a company called Herbs Etc. which she says successfully addressed bacteria, viruses and funguses in the chemtrails.

She describes getting “volcano like sores all over her head” with painful itchy scabs from what the “Deep Health” product was pushing out of her body and said that one sore didn’t heal for two years.

Then she noticed that when her scalp healed, her gray hair fell out and was replaced by fuller, darker hair. She took this to be a sign of renewed health.

Then she noticed a network of fungal growth under her skin, and discovered that diatomaceous earth taken in distilled water made it go away by chelating heavy metals such as the barium and aluminum being sprayed on us.

Please don’t go just by what I’m saying here. Read these articles carefully and completely. I intend to implement these suggestions with advice from a Naturopath. I wouldn’t recommend anyone do any of this on their own. We should all compare notes on this and keep learning from each other. There is no question that we’re under biological attack right now from chemtrails and its not hard to figure out what the ruling elite’s objective is because they tell us right out in the open.

They have flat out announced their intention to kill off 9/10ths of us via the message etched in stone in the Georgia Guidestones They have declared their intention to turn this into a psychocivilized society and to control us via mind control:

With this information we have something solid we can fight back with. Its not hard to see from this why they’re working so hard to ban our access to dietary supplements and herbs via Codex and related harmonization efforts including bills C-51/ C-52 in Canada, the EU Directives, and the FDA’s Trilateral Cooperation Charter.

As the IAHF network keeps growing, all of us will be better able to compare notes and to fight back together. Please forward this information widely after printing it out so you’ll make use of it. Read the articles referenced above carefully and keep on funneling information in to me so I can relay it back out to more people just as some of you did today. I appreciate all of you who’ve been sending in ideas, information and feedback as well as monetary donations.

IAHF 556 Boundary Bay Rd., Point Roberts WA 98281 USA, Paypal


Aerosol Crimes

Preparing the Battlefield

The Bush Administration steps up its secret moves against Iran

Operations outside the knowledge and control of commanders have eroded “the coherence of military strategy,” one general says.

Operations outside the knowledge and control of commanders have eroded “the coherence of military strategy,” one general says.

by Seymour M. Hersh

July 7, 2008 – The New Yorker

Late last year, Congress agreed to a request from President Bush to fund a major escalation of covert operations against Iran, according to current and former military, intelligence, and congressional sources. These operations, for which the President sought up to four hundred million dollars, were described in a Presidential Finding signed by Bush, and are designed to destabilize the country’s religious leadership. The covert activities involve support of the minority Ahwazi Arab and Baluchi groups and other dissident organizations. They also include gathering intelligence about Iran’s suspected nuclear-weapons program.

Clandestine operations against Iran are not new. United States Special Operations Forces have been conducting cross-border operations from southern Iraq, with Presidential authorization, since last year. These have included seizing members of Al Quds, the commando arm of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, and taking them to Iraq for interrogation, and the pursuit of “high-value targets” in the President’s war on terror, who may be captured or killed. But the scale and the scope of the operations in Iran, which involve the Central Intelligence Agency and the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), have now been significantly expanded, according to the current and former officials. Many of these activities are not specified in the new Finding, and some congressional leaders have had serious questions about their nature.

Under federal law, a Presidential Finding, which is highly classified, must be issued when a covert intelligence operation gets under way and, at a minimum, must be made known to Democratic and Republican leaders in the House and the Senate and to the ranking members of their respective intelligence committees—the so-called Gang of Eight. Money for the operation can then be reprogrammed from previous appropriations, as needed, by the relevant congressional committees, which also can be briefed.

“The Finding was focussed on undermining Iran’s nuclear ambitions and trying to undermine the government through regime change,” a person familiar with its contents said, and involved “working with opposition groups and passing money.” The Finding provided for a whole new range of activities in southern Iran and in the areas, in the east, where Baluchi political opposition is strong, he said.

Although some legislators were troubled by aspects of the Finding, and “there was a significant amount of high-level discussion” about it, according to the source familiar with it, the funding for the escalation was approved. In other words, some members of the Democratic leadership—Congress has been under Democratic control since the 2006 elections—were willing, in secret, to go along with the Administration in expanding covert activities directed at Iran, while the Party’s presumptive candidate for President, Barack Obama, has said that he favors direct talks and diplomacy.

The request for funding came in the same period in which the Administration was coming to terms with a National Intelligence Estimate, released in December, that concluded that Iran had halted its work on nuclear weapons in 2003. The Administration downplayed the significance of the N.I.E., and, while saying that it was committed to diplomacy, continued to emphasize that urgent action was essential to counter the Iranian nuclear threat. President Bush questioned the N.I.E.’s conclusions, and senior national-security officials, including Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, made similar statements. (So did Senator John McCain, the presumptive Republican Presidential nominee.) Meanwhile, the Administration also revived charges that the Iranian leadership has been involved in the killing of American soldiers in Iraq: both directly, by dispatching commando units into Iraq, and indirectly, by supplying materials used for roadside bombs and other lethal goods. (There have been questions about the accuracy of the claims; the Times, among others, has reported that “significant uncertainties remain about the extent of that involvement.”)

Military and civilian leaders in the Pentagon share the White House’s concern about Iran’s nuclear ambitions, but there is disagreement about whether a military strike is the right solution. Some Pentagon officials believe, as they have let Congress and the media know, that bombing Iran is not a viable response to the nuclear-proliferation issue, and that more diplomacy is necessary.

A Democratic senator told me that, late last year, in an off-the-record lunch meeting, Secretary of Defense Gates met with the Democratic caucus in the Senate. (Such meetings are held regularly.) Gates warned of the consequences if the Bush Administration staged a preëmptive strike on Iran, saying, as the senator recalled, “We’ll create generations of jihadists, and our grandchildren will be battling our enemies here in America.” Gates’s comments stunned the Democrats at the lunch, and another senator asked whether Gates was speaking for Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney. Gates’s answer, the senator told me, was “Let’s just say that I’m here speaking for myself.” (A spokesman for Gates confirmed that he discussed the consequences of a strike at the meeting, but would not address what he said, other than to dispute the senator’s characterization.)

The Joint Chiefs of Staff, whose chairman is Admiral Mike Mullen, were “pushing back very hard” against White House pressure to undertake a military strike against Iran, the person familiar with the Finding told me. Similarly, a Pentagon consultant who is involved in the war on terror said that “at least ten senior flag and general officers, including combatant commanders”—the four-star officers who direct military operations around the world—“have weighed in on that issue.”

The most outspoken of those officers is Admiral William Fallon, who until recently was the head of U.S. Central Command, and thus in charge of American forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. In March, Fallon resigned under pressure, after giving a series of interviews stating his reservations about an armed attack on Iran. For example, late last year he told the Financial Times that the “real objective” of U.S. policy was to change the Iranians’ behavior, and that “attacking them as a means to get to that spot strikes me as being not the first choice.”

Admiral Fallon acknowledged, when I spoke to him in June, that he had heard that there were people in the White House who were upset by his public statements. “Too many people believe you have to be either for or against the Iranians,” he told me. “Let’s get serious. Eighty million people live there, and everyone’s an individual. The idea that they’re only one way or another is nonsense.”

When it came to the Iraq war, Fallon said, “Did I bitch about some of the things that were being proposed? You bet. Some of them were very stupid.”

The Democratic leadership’s agreement to commit hundreds of millions of dollars for more secret operations in Iran was remarkable, given the general concerns of officials like Gates, Fallon, and many others. “The oversight process has not kept pace—it’s been coöpted” by the Administration, the person familiar with the contents of the Finding said. “The process is broken, and this is dangerous stuff we’re authorizing.”

Senior Democrats in Congress told me that they had concerns about the possibility that their understanding of what the new operations entail differs from the White House’s. One issue has to do with a reference in the Finding, the person familiar with it recalled, to potential defensive lethal action by U.S. operatives in Iran. (In early May, the journalist Andrew Cockburn published elements of the Finding in Counterpunch, a newsletter and online magazine.)

The language was inserted into the Finding at the urging of the C.I.A., a former senior intelligence official said. The covert operations set forth in the Finding essentially run parallel to those of a secret military task force, now operating in Iran, that is under the control of JSOC. Under the Bush Administration’s interpretation of the law, clandestine military activities, unlike covert C.I.A. operations, do not need to be depicted in a Finding, because the President has a constitutional right to command combat forces in the field without congressional interference. But the borders between operations are not always clear: in Iran, C.I.A. agents and regional assets have the language skills and the local knowledge to make contacts for the JSOC operatives, and have been working with them to direct personnel, matériel, and money into Iran from an obscure base in western Afghanistan. As a result, Congress has been given only a partial view of how the money it authorized may be used. One of JSOC’s task-force missions, the pursuit of “high-value targets,” was not directly addressed in the Finding. There is a growing realization among some legislators that the Bush Administration, in recent years, has conflated what is an intelligence operation and what is a military one in order to avoid fully informing Congress about what it is doing.

“This is a big deal,” the person familiar with the Finding said. “The C.I.A. needed the Finding to do its traditional stuff, but the Finding does not apply to JSOC. The President signed an Executive Order after September 11th giving the Pentagon license to do things that it had never been able to do before without notifying Congress. The claim was that the military was ‘preparing the battle space,’ and by using that term they were able to circumvent congressional oversight. Everything is justified in terms of fighting the global war on terror.” He added, “The Administration has been fuzzing the lines; there used to be a shade of gray”—between operations that had to be briefed to the senior congressional leadership and those which did not—“but now it’s a shade of mush.”

“The agency says we’re not going to get in the position of helping to kill people without a Finding,” the former senior intelligence official told me. He was referring to the legal threat confronting some agency operatives for their involvement in the rendition and alleged torture of suspects in the war on terror. “This drove the military people up the wall,” he said. As far as the C.I.A. was concerned, the former senior intelligence official said, “the over-all authorization includes killing, but it’s not as though that’s what they’re setting out to do. It’s about gathering information, enlisting support.” The Finding sent to Congress was a compromise, providing legal cover for the C.I.A. while referring to the use of lethal force in ambiguous terms.

The defensive-lethal language led some Democrats, according to congressional sources familiar with their views, to call in the director of the C.I.A., Air Force General Michael V. Hayden, for a special briefing. Hayden reassured the legislators that the language did nothing more than provide authority for Special Forces operatives on the ground in Iran to shoot their way out if they faced capture or harm.

The legislators were far from convinced. One congressman subsequently wrote a personal letter to President Bush insisting that “no lethal action, period” had been authorized within Iran’s borders. As of June, he had received no answer.

Members of Congress have expressed skepticism in the past about the information provided by the White House. On March 15, 2005, David Obey, then the ranking Democrat on the Republican-led House Appropriations Committee, announced that he was putting aside an amendment that he had intended to offer that day, and that would have cut off all funding for national-intelligence programs unless the President agreed to keep Congress fully informed about clandestine military activities undertaken in the war on terror. He had changed his mind, he said, because the White House promised better coöperation. “The Executive Branch understands that we are not trying to dictate what they do,” he said in a floor speech at the time. “We are simply trying to see to it that what they do is consistent with American values and will not get the country in trouble.”

Obey declined to comment on the specifics of the operations in Iran, but he did tell me that the White House reneged on its promise to consult more fully with Congress. He said, “I suspect there’s something going on, but I don’t know what to believe. Cheney has always wanted to go after Iran, and if he had more time he’d find a way to do it. We still don’t get enough information from the agencies, and I have very little confidence that they give us information on the edge.”

None of the four Democrats in the Gang of Eight—Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Intelligence Committee chairman John D. Rockefeller IV, and House Intelligence Committee chairman Silvestre Reyes—would comment on the Finding, with some noting that it was highly classified. An aide to one member of the Democratic leadership responded, on his behalf, by pointing to the limitations of the Gang of Eight process. The notification of a Finding, the aide said, “is just that—notification, and not a sign-off on activities. Proper oversight of ongoing intelligence activities is done by fully briefing the members of the intelligence committee.” However, Congress does have the means to challenge the White House once it has been sent a Finding. It has the power to withhold funding for any government operation. The members of the House and Senate Democratic leadership who have access to the Finding can also, if they choose to do so, and if they have shared concerns, come up with ways to exert their influence on Administration policy. (A spokesman for the C.I.A. said, “As a rule, we don’t comment one way or the other on allegations of covert activities or purported findings.” The White House also declined to comment.)

A member of the House Appropriations Committee acknowledged that, even with a Democratic victory in November, “it will take another year before we get the intelligence activities under control.” He went on, “We control the money and they can’t do anything without the money. Money is what it’s all about. But I’m very leery of this Administration.” He added, “This Administration has been so secretive.”

One irony of Admiral Fallon’s departure is that he was, in many areas, in agreement with President Bush on the threat posed by Iran. They had a good working relationship, Fallon told me, and, when he ran CENTCOM, were in regular communication. On March 4th, a week before his resignation, Fallon testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee, saying that he was “encouraged” about the situations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Regarding the role played by Iran’s leaders, he said, “They’ve been absolutely unhelpful, very damaging, and I absolutely don’t condone any of their activities. And I have yet to see anything since I’ve been in this job in the way of a public action by Iran that’s been at all helpful in this region.”

Fallon made it clear in our conversations that he considered it inappropriate to comment publicly about the President, the Vice-President, or Special Operations. But he said he had heard that people in the White House had been “struggling” with his views on Iran. “When I arrived at CENTCOM, the Iranians were funding every entity inside Iraq. It was in their interest to get us out, and so they decided to kill as many Americans as they could. And why not? They didn’t know who’d come out ahead, but they wanted us out. I decided that I couldn’t resolve the situation in Iraq without the neighborhood. To get this problem in Iraq solved, we had to somehow involve Iran and Syria. I had to work the neighborhood.”

Fallon told me that his focus had been not on the Iranian nuclear issue, or on regime change there, but on “putting out the fires in Iraq.” There were constant discussions in Washington and in the field about how to engage Iran and, on the subject of the bombing option, Fallon said, he believed that “it would happen only if the Iranians did something stupid.”

Fallon’s early retirement, however, appears to have been provoked not only by his negative comments about bombing Iran but also by his strong belief in the chain of command and his insistence on being informed about Special Operations in his area of responsibility. One of Fallon’s defenders is retired Marine General John J. (Jack) Sheehan, whose last assignment was as commander-in-chief of the U.S. Atlantic Command, where Fallon was a deputy. Last year, Sheehan rejected a White House offer to become the President’s “czar” for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. “One of the reasons the White House selected Fallon for CENTCOM was that he’s known to be a strategic thinker and had demonstrated those skills in the Pacific,” Sheehan told me. (Fallon served as commander-in-chief of U.S. forces in the Pacific from 2005 to 2007.) “He was charged with coming up with an over-all coherent strategy for Iran, Iraq, and Afghanistan, and, by law, the combatant commander is responsible for all military operations within his A.O.”—area of operations. “That was not happening,” Sheehan said. “When Fallon tried to make sense of all the overt and covert activity conducted by the military in his area of responsibility, a small group in the White House leadership shut him out.”

The law cited by Sheehan is the 1986 Defense Reorganization Act, known as Goldwater-Nichols, which defined the chain of command: from the President to the Secretary of Defense, through the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and on to the various combatant commanders, who were put in charge of all aspects of military operations, including joint training and logistics. That authority, the act stated, was not to be shared with other echelons of command. But the Bush Administration, as part of its global war on terror, instituted new policies that undercut regional commanders-in-chief; for example, it gave Special Operations teams, at military commands around the world, the highest priority in terms of securing support and equipment. The degradation of the traditional chain of command in the past few years has been a point of tension between the White House and the uniformed military.

“The coherence of military strategy is being eroded because of undue civilian influence and direction of nonconventional military operations,” Sheehan said. “If you have small groups planning and conducting military operations outside the knowledge and control of the combatant commander, by default you can’t have a coherent military strategy. You end up with a disaster, like the reconstruction efforts in Iraq.”

Admiral Fallon, who is known as Fox, was aware that he would face special difficulties as the first Navy officer to lead CENTCOM, which had always been headed by a ground commander, one of his military colleagues told me. He was also aware that the Special Operations community would be a concern. “Fox said that there’s a lot of strange stuff going on in Special Ops, and I told him he had to figure out what they were really doing,” Fallon’s colleague said. “The Special Ops guys eventually figured out they needed Fox, and so they began to talk to him. Fox would have won his fight with Special Ops but for Cheney.”

The Pentagon consultant said, “Fallon went down because, in his own way, he was trying to prevent a war with Iran, and you have to admire him for that.”

In recent months, according to the Iranian media, there has been a surge in violence in Iran; it is impossible at this early stage, however, to credit JSOC or C.I.A. activities, or to assess their impact on the Iranian leadership. The Iranian press reports are being carefully monitored by retired Air Force Colonel Sam Gardiner, who has taught strategy at the National War College and now conducts war games centered on Iran for the federal government, think tanks, and universities. The Iranian press “is very open in describing the killings going on inside the country,” Gardiner said. It is, he said, “a controlled press, which makes it more important that it publishes these things. We begin to see inside the government.” He added, “Hardly a day goes by now we don’t see a clash somewhere. There were three or four incidents over a recent weekend, and the Iranians are even naming the Revolutionary Guard officers who have been killed.”

Earlier this year, a militant Ahwazi group claimed to have assassinated a Revolutionary Guard colonel, and the Iranian government acknowledged that an explosion in a cultural center in Shiraz, in the southern part of the country, which killed at least twelve people and injured more than two hundred, had been a terrorist act and not, as it earlier insisted, an accident. It could not be learned whether there has been American involvement in any specific incident in Iran, but, according to Gardiner, the Iranians have begun publicly blaming the U.S., Great Britain, and, more recently, the C.I.A. for some incidents. The agency was involved in a coup in Iran in 1953, and its support for the unpopular regime of Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi—who was overthrown in 1979—was condemned for years by the ruling mullahs in Tehran, to great effect. “This is the ultimate for the Iranians—to blame the C.I.A.,” Gardiner said. “This is new, and it’s an escalation—a ratcheting up of tensions. It rallies support for the regime and shows the people that there is a continuing threat from the ‘Great Satan.’ ” In Gardiner’s view, the violence, rather than weakening Iran’s religious government, may generate support for it.

Many of the activities may be being carried out by dissidents in Iran, and not by Americans in the field. One problem with “passing money” (to use the term of the person familiar with the Finding) in a covert setting is that it is hard to control where the money goes and whom it benefits. Nonetheless, the former senior intelligence official said, “We’ve got exposure, because of the transfer of our weapons and our communications gear. The Iranians will be able to make the argument that the opposition was inspired by the Americans. How many times have we tried this without asking the right questions? Is the risk worth it?” One possible consequence of these operations would be a violent Iranian crackdown on one of the dissident groups, which could give the Bush Administration a reason to intervene.

A strategy of using ethnic minorities to undermine Iran is flawed, according to Vali Nasr, who teaches international politics at Tufts University and is also a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. “Just because Lebanon, Iraq, and Pakistan have ethnic problems, it does not mean that Iran is suffering from the same issue,” Nasr told me. “Iran is an old country—like France and Germany—and its citizens are just as nationalistic. The U.S. is overestimating ethnic tension in Iran.” The minority groups that the U.S. is reaching out to are either well integrated or small and marginal, without much influence on the government or much ability to present a political challenge, Nasr said. “You can always find some activist groups that will go and kill a policeman, but working with the minorities will backfire, and alienate the majority of the population.”

The Administration may have been willing to rely on dissident organizations in Iran even when there was reason to believe that the groups had operated against American interests in the past. The use of Baluchi elements, for example, is problematic, Robert Baer, a former C.I.A. clandestine officer who worked for nearly two decades in South Asia and the Middle East, told me. “The Baluchis are Sunni fundamentalists who hate the regime in Tehran, but you can also describe them as Al Qaeda,” Baer told me. “These are guys who cut off the heads of nonbelievers—in this case, it’s Shiite Iranians. The irony is that we’re once again working with Sunni fundamentalists, just as we did in Afghanistan in the nineteen-eighties.” Ramzi Yousef, who was convicted for his role in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who is considered one of the leading planners of the September 11th attacks, are Baluchi Sunni fundamentalists.

One of the most active and violent anti-regime groups in Iran today is the Jundallah, also known as the Iranian People’s Resistance Movement, which describes itself as a resistance force fighting for the rights of Sunnis in Iran. “This is a vicious Salafi organization whose followers attended the same madrassas as the Taliban and Pakistani extremists,” Nasr told me. “They are suspected of having links to Al Qaeda and they are also thought to be tied to the drug culture.” The Jundallah took responsibility for the bombing of a busload of Revolutionary Guard soldiers in February, 2007. At least eleven Guard members were killed. According to Baer and to press reports, the Jundallah is among the groups in Iran that are benefitting from U.S. support.

The C.I.A. and Special Operations communities also have long-standing ties to two other dissident groups in Iran: the Mujahideen-e-Khalq, known in the West as the M.E.K., and a Kurdish separatist group, the Party for a Free Life in Kurdistan, or PJAK.

The M.E.K. has been on the State Department’s terrorist list for more than a decade, yet in recent years the group has received arms and intelligence, directly or indirectly, from the United States. Some of the newly authorized covert funds, the Pentagon consultant told me, may well end up in M.E.K. coffers. “The new task force will work with the M.E.K. The Administration is desperate for results.” He added, “The M.E.K. has no C.P.A. auditing the books, and its leaders are thought to have been lining their pockets for years. If people only knew what the M.E.K. is getting, and how much is going to its bank accounts—and yet it is almost useless for the purposes the Administration intends.”

The Kurdish party, PJAK, which has also been reported to be covertly supported by the United States, has been operating against Iran from bases in northern Iraq for at least three years. (Iran, like Iraq and Turkey, has a Kurdish minority, and PJAK and other groups have sought self-rule in territory that is now part of each of those countries.) In recent weeks, according to Sam Gardiner, the military strategist, there has been a marked increase in the number of PJAK armed engagements with Iranians and terrorist attacks on Iranian targets. In early June, the news agency Fars reported that a dozen PJAK members and four Iranian border guards were killed in a clash near the Iraq border; a similar attack in May killed three Revolutionary Guards and nine PJAK fighters. PJAK has also subjected Turkey, a member of NATO, to repeated terrorist attacks, and reports of American support for the group have been a source of friction between the two governments.

Gardiner also mentioned a trip that the Iraqi Prime Minister, Nouri al-Maliki, made to Tehran in June. After his return, Maliki announced that his government would ban any contact between foreigners and the M.E.K.—a slap at the U.S.’s dealings with the group. Maliki declared that Iraq was not willing to be a staging ground for covert operations against other countries. This was a sign, Gardiner said, of “Maliki’s increasingly choosing the interests of Iraq over the interests of the United States.” In terms of U.S. allegations of Iranian involvement in the killing of American soldiers, he said, “Maliki was unwilling to play the blame-Iran game.” Gardiner added that Pakistan had just agreed to turn over a Jundallah leader to the Iranian government. America’s covert operations, he said, “seem to be harming relations with the governments of both Iraq and Pakistan and could well be strengthening the connection between Tehran and Baghdad.”

The White House’s reliance on questionable operatives, and on plans involving possible lethal action inside Iran, has created anger as well as anxiety within the Special Operations and intelligence communities. JSOC’s operations in Iran are believed to be modelled on a program that has, with some success, used surrogates to target the Taliban leadership in the tribal territories of Waziristan, along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. But the situations in Waziristan and Iran are not comparable.

In Waziristan, “the program works because it’s small and smart guys are running it,” the former senior intelligence official told me. “It’s being executed by professionals. The N.S.A., the C.I.A., and the D.I.A.”—the Defense Intelligence Agency—“are right in there with the Special Forces and Pakistani intelligence, and they’re dealing with serious bad guys.” He added, “We have to be really careful in calling in the missiles. We have to hit certain houses at certain times. The people on the ground are watching through binoculars a few hundred yards away and calling specific locations, in latitude and longitude. We keep the Predator loitering until the targets go into a house, and we have to make sure our guys are far enough away so they don’t get hit.” One of the most prominent victims of the program, the former official said, was Abu Laith al-Libi, a senior Taliban commander, who was killed on January 31st, reportedly in a missile strike that also killed eleven other people.

A dispatch published on March 26th by the Washington Post reported on the increasing number of successful strikes against Taliban and other insurgent units in Pakistan’s tribal areas. A follow-up article noted that, in response, the Taliban had killed “dozens of people” suspected of providing information to the United States and its allies on the whereabouts of Taliban leaders. Many of the victims were thought to be American spies, and their executions—a beheading, in one case—were videotaped and distributed by DVD as a warning to others.

It is not simple to replicate the program in Iran. “Everybody’s arguing about the high-value-target list,” the former senior intelligence official said. “The Special Ops guys are pissed off because Cheney’s office set up priorities for categories of targets, and now he’s getting impatient and applying pressure for results. But it takes a long time to get the right guys in place.”

The Pentagon consultant told me, “We’ve had wonderful results in the Horn of Africa with the use of surrogates and false flags—basic counterintelligence and counter-insurgency tactics. And we’re beginning to tie them in knots in Afghanistan. But the White House is going to kill the program if they use it to go after Iran. It’s one thing to engage in selective strikes and assassinations in Waziristan and another in Iran. The White House believes that one size fits all, but the legal issues surrounding extrajudicial killings in Waziristan are less of a problem because Al Qaeda and the Taliban cross the border into Afghanistan and back again, often with U.S. and NATO forces in hot pursuit. The situation is not nearly as clear in the Iranian case. All the considerations—judicial, strategic, and political—are different in Iran.”

He added, “There is huge opposition inside the intelligence community to the idea of waging a covert war inside Iran, and using Baluchis and Ahwazis as surrogates. The leaders of our Special Operations community all have remarkable physical courage, but they are less likely to voice their opposition to policy. Iran is not Waziristan.”

A Gallup poll taken last November, before the N.I.E. was made public, found that seventy-three per cent of those surveyed thought that the United States should use economic action and diplomacy to stop Iran’s nuclear program, while only eighteen per cent favored direct military action. Republicans were twice as likely as Democrats to endorse a military strike. Weariness with the war in Iraq has undoubtedly affected the public’s tolerance for an attack on Iran. This mood could change quickly, however. The potential for escalation became clear in early January, when five Iranian patrol boats, believed to be under the command of the Revolutionary Guard, made a series of aggressive moves toward three Navy warships sailing through the Strait of Hormuz. Initial reports of the incident made public by the Pentagon press office said that the Iranians had transmitted threats, over ship-to-ship radio, to “explode” the American ships. At a White House news conference, the President, on the day he left for an eight-day trip to the Middle East, called the incident “provocative” and “dangerous,” and there was, very briefly, a sense of crisis and of outrage at Iran. “TWO MINUTES FROM WAR” was the headline in one British newspaper.

The crisis was quickly defused by Vice-Admiral Kevin Cosgriff, the commander of U.S. naval forces in the region. No warning shots were fired, the Admiral told the Pentagon press corps on January 7th, via teleconference from his headquarters, in Bahrain. “Yes, it’s more serious than we have seen, but, to put it in context, we do interact with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard and their Navy regularly,” Cosgriff said. “I didn’t get the sense from the reports I was receiving that there was a sense of being afraid of these five boats.”

Admiral Cosgriff’s caution was well founded: within a week, the Pentagon acknowledged that it could not positively identify the Iranian boats as the source of the ominous radio transmission, and press reports suggested that it had instead come from a prankster long known for sending fake messages in the region. Nonetheless, Cosgriff’s demeanor angered Cheney, according to the former senior intelligence official. But a lesson was learned in the incident: The public had supported the idea of retaliation, and was even asking why the U.S. didn’t do more. The former official said that, a few weeks later, a meeting took place in the Vice-President’s office. “The subject was how to create a casus belli between Tehran and Washington,” he said.

In June, President Bush went on a farewell tour of Europe. He had tea with Queen Elizabeth II and dinner with Nicolas Sarkozy and Carla Bruni, the President and First Lady of France. The serious business was conducted out of sight, and involved a series of meetings on a new diplomatic effort to persuade the Iranians to halt their uranium-enrichment program. (Iran argues that its enrichment program is for civilian purposes and is legal under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.) Secretary of State Rice had been involved with developing a new package of incentives. But the Administration’s essential negotiating position seemed unchanged: talks could not take place until Iran halted the program. The Iranians have repeatedly and categorically rejected that precondition, leaving the diplomatic situation in a stalemate; they have not yet formally responded to the new incentives.

The continuing impasse alarms many observers. Joschka Fischer, the former German Foreign Minister, recently wrote in a syndicated column that it may not “be possible to freeze the Iranian nuclear program for the duration of the negotiations to avoid a military confrontation before they are completed. Should this newest attempt fail, things will soon get serious. Deadly serious.” When I spoke to him last week, Fischer, who has extensive contacts in the diplomatic community, said that the latest European approach includes a new element: the willingness of the U.S. and the Europeans to accept something less than a complete cessation of enrichment as an intermediate step. “The proposal says that the Iranians must stop manufacturing new centrifuges and the other side will stop all further sanction activities in the U.N. Security Council,” Fischer said, although Iran would still have to freeze its enrichment activities when formal negotiations begin. “This could be acceptable to the Iranians—if they have good will.”

The big question, Fischer added, is in Washington. “I think the Americans are deeply divided on the issue of what to do about Iran,” he said. “Some officials are concerned about the fallout from a military attack and others think an attack is unavoidable. I know the Europeans, but I have no idea where the Americans will end up on this issue.”

There is another complication: American Presidential politics. Barack Obama has said that, if elected, he would begin talks with Iran with no “self-defeating” preconditions (although only after diplomatic groundwork had been laid). That position has been vigorously criticized by John McCain. The Washington Post recently quoted Randy Scheunemann, the McCain campaign’s national-security director, as stating that McCain supports the White House’s position, and that the program be suspended before talks begin. What Obama is proposing, Scheunemann said, “is unilateral cowboy summitry.”

Scheunemann, who is known as a neoconservative, is also the McCain campaign’s most important channel of communication with the White House. He is a friend of David Addington, Dick Cheney’s chief of staff. I have heard differing accounts of Scheunemann’s influence with McCain; though some close to the McCain campaign talk about him as a possible national-security adviser, others say he is someone who isn’t taken seriously while “telling Cheney and others what they want to hear,” as a senior McCain adviser put it.

It is not known whether McCain, who is the ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, has been formally briefed on the operations in Iran. At the annual conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, in June, Obama repeated his plea for “tough and principled diplomacy.” But he also said, along with McCain, that he would keep the threat of military action against Iran on the table.


Photo of the Day #2 – Deliberate Dumbing Down of America

Look very closely at this image. What do you see? What do you not see?

My perception of this image is as follows:

The majority of children in the classroom are Caucasian, one African-American child and, possibly, one Hispanic. They all look a little coo-coo. One child has a cell phone in his ear with blood running down the same side, which could be a metaphor for the brain tumor he may eventually contract. The boy in the purple hat is also attempting to read a book on indoctrination Herd Mentality Made Easy. The powers that be are insuring that they bring everyone into the fold while they are still young. All the sheeple out there remember that you will be assimilated, herded like cattle unless you get up and DO SOMETHING!

The children in this image are Gentiles and it is also blatantly conspicuous that there are no Jewish children in the photo. And, of course, there wouldn’t be. The Jewish people are the only group of Americans which are allowed to engage in discrimination of all other groups including their own when it pertains to how Jewish a Jew should be. Other than gang-banger American Blacks, I don’t know of another group in this country as racist as the Jews. Their disdain and hatred for anyone non-Jewish is the complete anti-thesis of the founding fathers’ principles that the country was built upon. Then the Jewish upper middle-class to wealthy upper-class segregate themselves from the rest of American society. Did you ever wonder why you never met a Jewish person in your public school? Well, that’s why. Jewish children go to Hebrew academies. They are taught by other Jewish academics and rabbis and are fortunate to obtain the finest basic classroom education from the First Grade to graduation being adequately prepared to enter college and succeed, unlike most Gentiles today. Their segregation insures their autonomy and success in various areas of American society plus it also reaffirms the strength and stability of the Jewish group as a whole.

You won’t see dumbed-down Jewish children in America, ever!

If Jews are subjugated to fluoride like the rest of society, I would bet that they have some type of filtering process, or, purification system to remove the fluoride from the water in their schools so as to protect the delicate minds of their offspring. They know that fluoride effects brain processes and lowers I.Q. This explains why the country is inundated with Jewry in every facet of professional life. Today it’s rare to find a European American in the jobs that they once filled, which have now been replaced with Jews.

I digress…

Our children are being attacked and thwarted at every turn in their precious lives by the very government that was supposed to assist us in protecting them. Deadly fluoride and other aluminum waste by-products float through the veins of our little ones courtesy of the city or town public water works system. Genetically modified food, cloned meat and dairy, and other various drugs being prescribed such as Prozac and Ritalin impair thought processes and physical response time. They experience sluggishness and incoherency at times and they also struggle with the inability to concentrate, or, they become overly aggressive like the boy in the purple hat.

The reason for the varying difference in responses is due, in part, to drug interactions, which is specifically referred to as “adverse reactions” in medical terminology. There is a rare adverse reaction in humans with some drugs. It is called paradoxical syndrome. Paradoxical syndrome occurs when the body reacts in the opposite manner to a prescribed medication. For example, prescription narcotics severely impair the central nervous system keeping most people from driving or operating machinery. However, in a small percentage of people the effect is just the opposite. Instead of feeling drowsy the paradoxical people are more alert and wide awake.

Ritalin and Prozac could also be having dangerous adverse reactions on our children causing them to behave, either, outside the normal realm or in a paradoxical manner. Exposing a young body and mind to these lethal drugs will eventually have far reaching consequences that may affect our children’s future. Furthermore, some children may have adverse reactions being prescribed to both drugs at the same time.

Causes for childhood depression, anxiety and attention deficit range from nutritional imbalances and chemical exposure to home and school problems. Instead of addressing causes, many doctors and psychologists treat the symptoms with powerful medications. Today, almost nine million children, or almost one out of every five children, take psychoactive drugs for their behavior disorders, many of which are questionable diagnoses.

In many areas, one of every five children is labeled with ‘attention deficit’ or ADHD. The number of children so diagnosed increased by 90% between 1989 and 1996! Three-fourths of the doctor visits resulted in drug treatment. Clinical Psychiatric News, July 1998 reported that 223 children under age 3 who enrolled in Michigan’s Medicaid program before December 1996 were labeled ADHD. The author adds: “Amazingly, 57% of these children were treated with one or more psychotropic drugs including Ritalin, Prozac, Dexedrine, Aventyl and Syban. Thirty-three percent were medicated with two or more of these drugs.”

Combining anti-depressants (Prozac or Luvox) and psychostimulants (Ritalin) increases the risk of cardiovascular collapse, seizures, euphoria and psychosis (3). Researchers at the Brookhaven National Laboratory reported that “when Ritalin was given to cocaine users, they couldn’t distinguish the Ritalin high from the cocaine high”.

Why the epidemic? Lack of parental supervision, loss of values, poor role models, too much TV, and outmoded educational systems may all contribute. Schools often receive money for every child they diagnose with ADHD. It seems easier to prescribe a drug than spend the time to investigate the problem. There are other reasons, however, that are well-documented but hardly ever discussed. (

Exercising parental rights is a responsibility that should not be taken lightly. The school system and the medical community are taking liberties that are not theirs to take. Ultimately, your God-given right to raise your child in whatever way you deem appropriate is still the responsibility of every American parent. There are a few steps that can be taken so that our children do not become complete morons.

Get involved again in your children’s lives. Stop putting them in front of the television set because you don’t want to interact with them. Don’t leave your children with other people all the time even if you have a big family. Children should be with their parents 90% of the time. If you have small children talk to them and read to them every single day. Teach them as much as you can before they leave for school. It will provide a stable foundation for a secure future.

Take the time to investigate the local educational system right now. Find out what your area schools are doing: Do they have a good variety of programs? What about violence and drugs? Talk with everyone in the school that you can find, teachers and administration, even other students if possible. Then determine if your child is still going to be in a sea of prejudice and hate. I would not want my child in that kind of situation. If there isn’t a school in your area that you feel would be safe for your child investigate alternative options, such as, home schooling, or, possibly private school instruction.

Ultimately, the decision is yours, parents! Don’t be duped into believing that the school system and the A.M.A. has the last word on everything. Apparently, these offices were set up as apparatuses of investigation and local eavesdropping on ordinary, law-abiding citizens. Research all avenues and possibilities regarding your child or children. Don’t take anyone’s word for anything and always, trust your instincts.

A.D.D. and A.D.H.D. have now been proven to be fraudulent psychiatric disorders.

Actually, it was one more opportunity for our controllers to drug down the next generation creating totally “useless eaters”, which will be more malleable in the coming police state . Moreover, it was another test to ascertain if they could manipulate thousands of parents into placing their children on these dangerous drugs without so much as a whimper. Obviously, that part of their plan was successful.

Right now, begin making inquiries to remove the fluoride and heavy metals from the water flowing into your home, including showers. The warm moist steam from taking showers increases the absorption of fluoride into the body. ( Cleansing our brains and bodies of the toxins that the government continues to inundate us with is a huge step in the right direction.

The Way We Were

These photographs are reminiscent of my carefree school days when teachers had the upper hand and children were courteous, orderly and obeyed their elders for the most part.

We traded in our sanity for political correctness and life in a completely insane world.

God bless the good old days –


9/11 Chronicles: Truth Rising

Truth Rising: The Blueprint For Change

Paul Joseph Watson
Tuesday, July 1, 2008

Alex Jones’ 9/11 Chronicles Part One: Truth Rising is more than a rollercoaster adventure through the various expressions of the 9/11 truth movement, it pays homage to a form of direct activism that has corrupt politicians scuttling for cover across the country as their crimes are exposed in public.

The film is a blueprint for unravelling the 9/11 cover-up and going on the offensive in the name of truth.

Arriving amidst a barrage of abuse, death threats and corporate media hit pieces directed towards the 9/11 Truth Movement, 9/11 Chronicles Part One: Truth Rising is a reminder of the core principles that unite us and what we have collectively achieved over the course of the last few years alone.

The film begins by highlighting the heartbreaking plight of the 9/11 first responders, a theme that forms the framework of the movie, and reminds us that the first government cover-up in the aftermath of 9/11 occurred almost immediately after the towers collapsed.

The very heroes of that tragic day have been completely abandoned by the same government that invokes the names of their dead and dying comrades in order to implement a dark and destructive political agenda.

But it’s an agenda in terminal gridlock largely thanks to the efforts of a raft of truth seekers who have turned confrontational activism into an art form by organizing themselves into grass roots activist chapters and joining arms to stand up to evil wherever it dare show its face.

“We have to continually ask questions – that’s what a patriot does,” Immortal Technique’s soul-stirring ground zero speech implores, and it’s a mantra that has not only been embraced by We Are Change chapters nationwide, but pushed even further to the point where answers are being demanded in no uncertain terms.

“No army can stop an idea whose time has come,” reads the film’s tagline, but the efforts of the gatekeepers, bullies and thugs who use petty power to threaten and intimidate 9/11 truthers is exposed. The corporate media has attempted to demonize truthers as violent and potentially dangerous, but the only examples of violence and intimidation has come from those who would silence truthseekers by force, as is documented in the movie.

The movie also recognizes the courage of the many public figures who have risked their careers to speak out in support of 9/11 truth, people like Charlie Sheen, Martin Sheen, Jesse Ventura and Christine Ebersole, and how their bold stance is helping to arouse intrigue about the real story behind 9/11 across America.

In addition, the film presents the latest and most hardcore 9/11 evidence, including an interview with Richard Gage about the demolition of the towers and WTC 7.

The spotlight deservedly shines on We Are Change founder Luke Rudkowski, a courageous young man who has inspired scores of other We Are Change chapter groups to organically spring up across the country.

Luke explains how We Are Change began and provides the blueprint from which the seeds of change can be scattered – a kind of instruction manual for budding activists that we hope will be motivated to join the fight after they watch Truth Rising.

Get the DVD, make copies, hand them out to family, friends and strangers. 9/11 Chronicles: Truth Rising is the tool with which people really can be inspired to be the change they want to see in the world.

You can also find the video in my VodPod. Scroll down the blog page until you see a scarlet red vertical box in the sidebar. The video pops out for your convenience.  If you don’t see it click the link to go to my VodPod page.


Open Complicity: Anatomy of the 9/11 Coverup

By far this is one of the most intelligent, truthful documentaries on Sept. 11th. The producer only addresses the facts, not conspiracies.

This is a 9/11 doc for the advanced class. It starts off with the defeat of the official story as point of departure, then examines specific anomalies and advances a theory to explain their presence. Much of this material is not discussed in other films. The film supports a particular conclusion which you are invited to discuss at annarbor911truth dot com. The first part talks about insider trading which is rather dry since there is no video footage to go with it, but stay with it–by the end you will be amazed!” — covers israeli involvement, bush’s nonrespond and the medias preannouncement of the wtc7 “collapse” — more…

It’s an eight-part documentary. Go to the original URL YouTube page where you’ll see the playlist on the righthand side.

UPDATE 4/1/2009 – Video: “The Armageddon Ritual”

3/4/2009 – Alert:  John Alan Martinson, Jr’s. documentaries and other videos, including written articles on the Jewish Agenda, have been permanently removed from the internet.  He can be located at, – Jewish Crime Network and his personal blog at or

I have a few of his documentaries uploaded to a file-sharing site if anyone is interested.  If so, send me an email and I will forward the link(s).


April 1, 2009 – Postscript: John’s video The Armageddon Ritual has been permanently removed from the internet.  Also, (Jewish Crime Network) closed down due to lack of sufficient funds for operational expenses.  An upcoming announcement on future endeavors from John will be posted this week.