WW~Notes: My readers know that I rarely if ever talk about White Nationalism, White Identity, or White Pride mainly because of the negative connotations they denote not only to other whites but non-whites, as well. I detest how these mantras and memes have been presented to the world. In America, everyone seems to harken back to the days of the KKK which has mainly been associated with any type of white identity. Those days are over and long gone. Like slavery, the KKK was a disappointing chapter in American history that most of us wished never happened.
What I present here is a critique from a white Italian American that has the best ideas I’ve heard up to this point about how to present our cause in a non-threatening, rational manner in the hope of preserving the white race for future generations.
This is an uncomfortable subject that most whites would rather not address, but we must if we are to survive and we have just as much right to live on as any other race on this planet, and frankly I’m tired of reading about the destruction of the white race, or stamping it out, or weeding out our genes.
I, being an Italian-American who is a member of the Caucasian race, was unaware of the danger that my people across the world are currently facing for most of my life. It wasn’t until I was 28 that I finally learned about the tragic reality and the danger of the total demographic displacement and possible extinction of White people across the world. Countries that were founded by White Europeans are being overwhelmed with so many non-white immigrants that the racial demographics are being totally altered, especially in European countries. This is exacerbated by the fact that the European birthrate across the globe averages 1.4 children per family. Demographers tell us that for a human population to remain stable in numbers from one generation to the next each woman must give birth to 2.1 children. At present, even without third world immigration, people of European extraction are engaged in racial suicide. Coupled with immigrant birthrates much higher this will inevitably lead to the total replacement of the indigenous populations of all countries founded by White Europeans.
On top of immigration in whatever form it may be, the welfare system is being totally abused by these foreigners which becomes a burden on the indigenous people. They are lured to make the trek to our homelands by traitors within the gates dangling these free benefits and subsidies in their faces. Conflict also arises from the fact these immigrants are unable to assimilate into the indigenous cultures due to their disparate customs and belief systems. They do not come to our countries to be part of our culture but rather to transplant their own foreign laws and alien religions. They are unwilling to compromise with the people they are now living among. This creates cultural tension because the indigenous people feel they are being invaded by alien forces who wish to replace them, and these foreigners believe their cultures should become the dominant one. The cultural differences and failure to adapt to Western civilization leads many of these immigrants to live a life of crime and they have become the leading cause of the increase of violent crimes across these countries thus creating even more resentment towards them.
I have been researching all forms of White Nationalist ideologies for the last year; –from the most extreme to the most liberal — and they all proclaim the terrible fact that the White race is at risk of being totally wiped-out along with its various cultures that it has birthed. Although they share the common goal of trying to preserve and protect the White race, they do not use the same strategies, the same beliefs in regards to certain issues, nor are they able to capture the hearts and minds of their audience effectively. The White Nationalist movement is so scattered and unorganized, it cannot possibly become effective unless Whites organize into one collective organization based not on hatred, fear, or distrust, but rather, based on love, conviction, and unity regardless of religious or personal differences.
But I think the biggest issue with the “pro-White” movement is that it suffers from a major PR and marketing problem. The reason why most Whites can’t even express their concerns is not only because of the controlled “anti-white” media, but also the fact that their views are seen as “extreme” and “politically incorrect” since they don’t even realize what is implied in the messages being disseminated by their propaganda. Phrases such as “DIEversity = White Genocide” or “Anti-racist is a code-word for Anti-White”, are not only confusing to the unitiated White, they actually blame other people for what is happening and don’t even address the fact that Whites that WHITES ARE COMMITTING RACIAL SUICIDE!!! It’s the heart of deceit to blame others for our racial demise when most of us aren’t bothering to procreate. This is the main reason I believe that these mantras, phrases, and memes are failing to get their intended points across, which are then twisted by anti-whites to be used against the pro-White movement.
If what I said wasn’t true, then why is it that most of the White advocates are anonymous internet activists lurking in Cyberspace who fear losing their jobs? Why should they have to hide their faces if what they are saying is so true and irrefutable that no one could dismiss or debunk it? Why is their message considered taboo or politically incorrect? Why aren’t Whites waking up at an exponential rate? The answers to these questions lie with the fact that their memes and messages are not being directed to a universal audience, their semantics can be misconstrued, and they are not always true. Not only are they not always true, most of them are nothing more than complaints that make Whites seem like pissed-off bigots.
I believe using universal messages to educate ALL races of the dangers of cultural Marxism will make our own liberation easier. Working with other races that are aware of what is happening is better than going with the “us vs them” mentality that some extreme WNs believe is the only approach, which would ultimately lead to a race war and genocide. If we successfully wake up the intellectuals and think-tanks of the other races who realize that this globalist agenda will eventually destroy their people as well, we can form strong alliances against the Marxists and destroy their matrix once and for all.
As I critique these phrases below, first read them as if you were a non-white, then look at them again as if you were a clueless White person, and you will probably realize that you will feel the same way, offended and not getting the correct message.
1.) Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, White countries for EVERYBODY!
Although this statement is partially true, it implies that the current non-white population in “White countries” are unwanted and need to be removed or sent back to wherever they came from. Now of course any sane person would agree that in any country, the majority of the population should consist of its founders, but most White people don’t feel this way because they have been brainwashed to accept globalism; especially in America where these communist traitors claim it was always meant to be a “melting pot”. Aside from this, most Whites don’t have feelings of animosity towards non-whites (at least openly), and if anything, they feel guilty due to the constant indoctrination of “white guilt” propaganda via every form of media. Most rational White Nationalists state they simply love their race don’t hate other races or even blame them from what is happening. So this begs the question, why use a phrase that sends the wrong message? Is this any different than saying “Hey non-whites, you don’t belong here!!! I am mad MY countries have become melting pots and I want you to go back to where you came from because this specific piece of earth is mine!!!”?
Firstly, no one is going to kindly leave because you want them to, so expect heavy resistance which would probably lead to violence and rioting. These immigrants are simply acting in their best interests; being enticed to immigrate into countries founded by Whites because of the treacherous policies enacted by the communist traitors that were put in power. You cannot blame these immigrants for doing what any person who wants a better life would do. You can’t blame a Mexican for wanting to cross America’s borders and to get free health care and all these other benefits that he would never get in Mexico. Nor could you blame an African to do the same; wanting to escape a war-torn, AIDS infested continent to live a better life in a European country at someone else’s expense.
Secondly, no race was given a country by any authority. What’s actually happening is that White people are simply not standing up and defending the homelands that they founded. They have given up their lands by allowing traitors to sell them out and are doing are nothing about it because of the consequences of going against the system. There are no such thing as “White countries” by default. Before the 1607 Jamestown landing, the North American continent was entirely a “red country”. Subsequent white immigration and superior military technology made it a nominally “White country” and now White suicidal thinking (collective mental illness) is in the process of turning it into a “brown country”. No race has a “right” to any land. Land only belongs to those who are willing to exercise the power and authority to hold it. Political power is the result of majority occupation. It’s only “your” country if your people constitute the outright majority. That is what the laws of history teach us. Countries like people are mortal. They are born and die as a study of old maps from various historic epochs show us. Where are the Roman Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Khazar Kaganate, the Mongol Empire, etc. today? Every ethnic/racial group or non-human animal species on this planet must conquer, maintain and protect whatever territory it acquires. In the last 500 years Whites conquered, expanded and built the most prosperous countries in history. But over recent decades, they have become suicidal in their thinking and are giving away all their territories. Therefore, indirectly stating that non-whites do not belong and need to go back to their lands of origin is not an effective message nor does it teach Whites what is actually happening.
I think a better phrase would be “Uncontrolled massive immigration will displace any nation”. This is irrefutable because it is true. It is also a universal truth that applies to any nation of people. Too much immigration will eventually displace any “nation”, which refers to a PEOPLE; not some piece of land. Nations are defined as political entities in which people share a common ethnicity, culture and traditions. The boundaries and names of countries may change, but a nation of people, bound by blood, culture and language is a whole other story. You can turn this phrase into positive propaganda as well by saying “Protect our nation from massive immigration”.
As you can see with these phrases, no races are being called out or blamed, and what is being criticized is a policy: Uncontrolled massive immigration, which ultimately leads to multiculturalism that will destroy all peoples involved. This message also doesn’t make it seem like Whites are being “selfish”, “racist” or “ignorant” since it’s a universal message. There is nothing wrong or immoral about wanting to preserve one’s nation, boundaries, and culture.
2.) Anti-racist is a code word for Anti-white.
Firstly, this implies that any person who wants human beings to live peacefully in a multicultural utopia is automatically an “anti-white” and is consciously against the white race or even purposefully involved in its destruction. We cannot fault the average person in TV land for falling victim to this fraudulent propaganda that we can somehow create a multicultural utopia. Most people want peace, harmony, and wish all races to prosper. I don’t think any loving human being wishes the worst for any race or people; unless of course they are extremists full of true irrational hatred.
Being that most people, including the bulk of our White folks, have been indoctrinated with this idea that the whole world should blend into a giant multicultural racial family, this phrase implies that they are somehow evil for wanting to see humanity progress from the evils of “racism” and move towards global unity. They are thinking, “How could a world where all races live happily and respectfully together be evil?” The problem is that that they don’t know their approach is impossible as it runs contrary to human nature. Humans like other animals are prone to the “herd mentality”. As lions seek the companionship of other lions so humans seek out the companionship of those who most closely resemble them in outward appearance and temperament. When two or more ethnic groups are forced to reside and cohabitate in the same political entity, human nature rears its ugly face. In multicultural societies (dystopias) , ethnic groups are forced into a power struggle in order to secure their own unique interests. Only in these societies can such power struggles even exist; where religious, cultural, and racial differences inevitably create internal issues that then lead to civil war and ultimately total collapse. History shows us this truth time and time again; NO multicultural, multiracial nor polyglot empire has worked, can work or will ever work. But those who are ignorant to these lessons of history aren’t really anti-white, they are ANTI-NATIONALIST. They are globalists/communists without even being aware of it. Race is probably the last thing they care about. Chances are, they probably think it’s a social construct.
Secondly, in today’s politically correct Marxist matrix, not being a “racist” is the highest moral achievement possible. Having a record as a sex offender is probably more laudable than being publicly labelled as a “racist”. Most Whites take an anti-racist stance simply to fit in and show others they aren’t like the rest of those damned White Devils. So calling an “anti-racist” (who can be person of any color that believes they are fighting against racism, bigotry, and supremacy) an ”anti-white” is ineffective because it is false. The vast majority don’t hate white people, they simply oppose certain ideologies. Furthermore, a “white anti-white” doesn’t “hate” himself. He doesn’t lose sleep at night for being white, nor does he wish he was of another race. He may just feel indebt to the world because of the lies he has been taught ie. “White people conquered, enslaved and genocided everyone of a darker hue” and doesn’t care for nationalism. If he doesn’t believe race exists, then he will feel no need to preserve it. If he believes being “racist” is the worst social stigma possible, then he will obviously not want to be labeled as such and stand against it to avoid being ostracized. But feeling guilty or thinking you are fighting against racism, bigotry, and supremacy, is totally different than actively hating White people. I would only use the term anti-white towards people who literally hate white people, like Tim Wise and other vermin like him.
“Self preservation is a human right for all people , including Whites”.
“Condemning White collectivism is racial discrimination ”
No sane person can oppose these, nor can they be refuted without implying that Whites have no right to exist or organize. When you say ” a natural right for ALL PEOPLE” no one can honestly label you as a racist, bigot, or supremacist. And anyone who condemns White collectivism is guilty of those former charges.
3.) Diversity = White Genocide
Although this isn’t totally false, how many people do you think actually know the stages of genocide, let alone the UN’s four definitions of it (as codified in their 1948 convention against genocide)? Not many, otherwise we wouldn’t be in this situation. When people hear the word “genocide” they look around and expect to see death camps, machine gun pits, and White corpses stacked by the thousands, just like they’ve seen in photos of Auschwitz, but they don’t. So even though this word is technically appropriate, when people hear this phrase, they roll their eyes and think it is nonsense.
Ask yourself, what is the number one real cause of “White Genocide”? Does the presence of non-whites magically make White people vanish from the earth or is it that Whites are CHOOSING to have less children? For whatever the reason is, whether it’s the differences in reproduction strategies of the races, whether it’s because of economic stressors making Whites afraid to have bigger families, or whether it is the disproportional murders of Whites by non-Whites, the fact remains, Whites are complicit in their own genocide by CHOOSING to have less children, CHOOSING to race-mix, and in some cases, not having ANY children at all. Is there anyone putting a gun to White people’s heads and telling them have less children or to race-mix? No. I don’t care how much propaganda is out there exposing who is behind what, at the end of the day, Whites MUST realize they are doing this to themselves.
“Diversity = White Genocide” doesn’t work because it shifts the blame away from Whites and puts it on non-Whites or other external forces . For whatever reasons Whites have decided to commit racial SUICIDE. This phrase is false and that is why it is found to be offensive by Whites and non-whites alike. No one was saying “Diversity = White Genocide” when Europeans conquered the Americas. If anything, diversity and the interracial animosity it created ended up causing the genocide of the Native American population through demographic displacement and disease. True, diversity can lead to genocide, but not ONLY White genocide, so the equation is false. Thus “Diversity may lead to genocide” would be a more universal and accurate statement that is irrefutable.
The best phrase to describe what we are actually saying would be “Forced Diversity = Demographic Displacement”. Not only is this is irrefutable, but the phrase “demographic displacement” is the only reason why we can even use the word genocide in the first place. Article II section (c) is used to legitimately state our case for White Genocide, but is it not just diversity in itself that causes genocide, it’s the forcing of non-Whites it onto our nations that will displace our people and lead to our destruction. “Diversity=White Genocide” lacks the fact it is being forced upon us against our will. In order for our phrase to be true, we must add the word “forced” in order to make others realize that it is indeed a government sponsored genocide. But, if you look down at Article III section (e), we too are guilty, by being complicit in our own genocide by having less children.
Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Article III: The following acts shall be punishable:
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide.
4.) White Power
This phrase, originally coined by American Nazi Party leader George Lincoln Rockwell, should never be uttered by any White person if they wish to ever be taken seriously. This phrase actually implies that you are in a power struggle between other races and are calling for a race war. Even though power struggles are natural in a multicultural society, saying White Power implies that you want to dominate over the other races. We don’t need “power” over anyone, we simply strive for self-determination and power over ourselves.
I suggest “Self-determination for our nation” is a better phrase. Again, no one can call your a racist here and if they go against what you are saying, then they are guilty of being a supremacist for not allowing you and your people to be free from their rules and ideologies.
5.) White Pride
This is a phrase we should avoid because simply being born a certain race actually isn’t an accomplishment. Honestly speaking, it’s an accident of your birth. Also, just because a bunch of your ancestors did amazing things, that doesn’t mean YOU can walk around taking credit for them. What have YOU done? What have YOU accomplished? Being born isn’t any great accomplishment, in fact, everyone has done that. So what exactly are YOU proud of? What would your ancestors think of you today as you commit racial suicide and hand over the nations they founded with their blood, sweat, and tears to the very Marxists they died fighting against?
White Pride, or any racial pride for that matter, sends the wrong message to a racially unaware person. To them it sounds like you are only proud of your racial phenotype. People don’t understand what you are really trying to say. The phrase “White Pride” is intended to mean you appreciate your racial heritage, culture, and ancestors who helped change the world. This phrase doesn’t clearly state that at all and this is why when someone says “White Pride” is comes off as “racist”. Of course, someone can say “Black Pride” in this world biased towards Whites, but what does that even mean? What are they proud of? What is anyone proud of when they say something like this?
I think a better way would be to say “Honor your heritage” which is a universal message or “White Honor” which is telling Whites to honor their ancestors, their culture, and to live a virtuous life. These messages clear any confusion. You are not just “proud” of being a certain racial phenotype. Being born into a certain race and acting as if that is an achievement to be proud of isn’t even good enough. How many Whites are actually destroying our people? A lot. So being born White isn’t enough; you must act and think White, care for your people, honor your ancestors, be a nobleman, and have respect for nature and all other races as well.
I could probably go on with my critique but my main point is that our messages are not universal enough and don’t get our intended points across effectively. Below I will list a few other phrases I have come up with that I think could be very effective and used in our plight against this Marxist Matrix.
“Racial preservation is not bigotry”
“Self determination is the opposite of supremacy”
“White advocacy is not White supremacy”
“Forced assimilation destroys free nations”
“White Privilege theory is racial discrimination”
“Affirmative action is government sponsored racism”
“Racial identity is healthy”
“Massive immigration + Low White birthrates = Loss of country”
“Multiculturalism is the precursor to all cultural conflict”
“Amnesty = aiding and abetting criminals”
….Also, questions are EXTREMELY powerful.
“Did you know that low White birthrates are leading Whites towards extinction?”
“Did you know that every 6 minutes a white women gets raped by a non-white?”
“Have you heard about the ongoing genocide of Whites in South Africa?”
“Are you prepared to live in a world without White people?”
“Do you want your children to be a minority in your country?”
By no means am I an authority or an expert in this field (I’ve only been racially aware for about year) so I hope more experienced White Advocates come up with even better and more effective phrases that follow a universal, irrefutable formula that can be understood by anyone who isn’t aware of what is really going on.