The Jewish Plan for America from its inception

JEW George Soros wants all Gentiles nationally and culturally one, morally degraded and racially mongrelized under a super-government controlled by a racially pure Jewish race


Still Report #1091 – FBI Analyst

Skip to 6:01…



Related Los Angeles Times article…

Does the term “apartheid” fit Israel? Of course it does…

The storm of controversy after Secretary of State John F. Kerry’s warning that Israel risked becoming an “apartheid state” reminded us once again that facts, data and the apparently tedious details of international law often seem to have little bearing on conversations about Israel conducted at the highest levels of this country. As was the case when other major figures brandished the “A-word” in connection with Israel (Jimmy Carter comes to mind), the political reaction to Kerry’s warning was instantaneous and emotional. “Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East, and any linkage between Israel and apartheid is nonsensical and ridiculous,” said California Sen. Barbara Boxer. That’s that, then, eh?

Not quite. Flat and ungrounded assertions may satisfy politicians, but anyone who wants to push the envelope of curiosity even a little bit further might want to spend a few minutes actually thinking over the term and its applicability to Israel.

“Apartheid” isn’t just a term of insult; it’s a word with a very specific legal meaning, as defined by the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid, adopted by the U.N. General Assembly in 1973 and ratified by most United Nations member states (Israel and the United States are exceptions, to their shame).

According to Article II of that convention, the term applies to acts “committed for the purpose of establishing and maintaining domination by one racial group of persons over any other racial group of persons and systematically oppressing them.” Denying those others the right to life and liberty, subjecting them to arbitrary arrest, expropriating their property, depriving them of the right to leave and return to their country or the right to freedom of movement and of residence, creating separate reserves and ghettos for the members of different racial groups, preventing mixed marriages — these are all examples of the crime of apartheid specifically mentioned in the convention.

Seeing the reference to racial groups here, some people might think of race in a putatively biological sense or as a matter of skin color. That is a rather simplistic (and dated) way of thinking about racial identity. More to the point, however, the operative definition of “racial identity” is provided in the 1965 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (to which Israel is a signatory), on which the apartheid convention explicitly draws.

There, the term “racial discrimination” is defined as “any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, color, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life.”

A few basic facts are now in order.

The Jewish state (for so it identifies itself, after all) maintains a system of formal and informal housing segregation both in Israel and in the occupied territories. It’s obvious, of course, that Jewish settlements in the West Bank aren’t exactly bursting with Palestinians. In Israel itself, however, hundreds of communities have been established for Jewish residents on land expropriated from Palestinians, in which segregation is maintained, for example, by admissions committees empowered to use ethnic criteria long since banned in the United States, or by the inability of Palestinian citizens to access land held exclusively for the Jewish people by the state-sanctioned Jewish National Fund.

Jewish residents of the occupied territories enjoy various rights and privileges denied to their Palestinian neighbors. While the former enjoy the protections of Israeli civil law, the latter are subject to the harsh provisions of military law. So, while their Jewish neighbors come and go freely, West Bank Palestinians are subject to arbitrary arrest and detention, and to the denial of freedom of movement; they are frequently barred from access to educational or healthcare facilities, Christian and Muslim sites for religious worship, and so on.

Read more…

Source: First Light Forum

9 thoughts on “The Jewish Plan for America from its inception

  1. If Jews treat people that way in Israel where they have the upper hand, what makes people think they won’t get the same treatment once they have complete control here?
    If people knew how to identify them here, and knew what they are doing and how they go about it, they would realize that at least to some extent, they already are.
    Non-Jews don’t realize how much they are discriminated against by Jews for the simple reason that they don’t recognize them as being Jews.
    In my opinion the majority of these “jews” operate within non-Jewish society as non-Jews. it’s only a minority of them who wear the beanies and dress like booger men.
    The rest all assume the trappings and accent of the areas in which they live.

    However, none of this stops them from identifying themselves with the Jews and acting accordingly.


    Up to the 15th century, there was GLOBALIZATION; it was called THE PAPACY, THE UNIVERSAL CHURCH.

    The REFORMATION and the RENAISSANCE broke the power of GLOBAL ROME!


    They are the only CATHOLIC ORDER that were given permission to enter BANKING.
    The JESUITS were performing Plays, in England, before Shakespeare, and made fun of the REFORMATION.
    Shakespeare was a PAPIST! Now go back and read him, with that in mind!
    Forget the THEOLOGY, concentrate on the FREEDOM, Luther brought to Europe!
    The JESUITS were founded to DESTROY that FREEDOM.

    Simple exercise!
    Google: The RED Mass and The BLUE Mass.
    Now you will see how the PAPACY rules America!



    Google: THE RULERS OF EVIL: by Tupper Saussy

    In the past, Jesuits had focused primarily on assassination and court influence, both fraught with great personal peril. But in building the global financial network, allied with loyal families, themselves aligned to the ancient Jewish noble families, the Jesuits could effectively start huge wars and never risk direct implication.

    Founded Name Nation Status
    1602 Dutch East India Company Netherlands Private
    1672 Hoares UK Bank
    1690 Barclays UK Private
    1692 Coutts UK Bank
    1694 Bank of England UK Central
    1695 Bank of Scotland UK Bank
    1727 Royal Bank of Scotland UK Bank
    1741 Wegelin Switzerland Bank
    1755 Bank Leu Switzerland Bank
    1762 Hope & Co Netherlands Private
    1784 Bank of New York USA Bank
    1787 La Roche Switzerland Bank
    1796 Lombard Odier Darier Hentsch Switzerland Bank
    1796 Darier Hentsch & Cie Switzerland – Private
    1799 Bank of the Manhattan Company (now JP Morgan Chase Bank) USA Private
    1800 Rothschild Germany – Private
    1805 Pictet Switzerland Bank
    1762/1806 Barings Brothers & Co Bank UK – Private
    1812 City Bank of New York (now CitiBank) USA – Private
    1816 Mirabaud Switzerland Bank
    1817 Bank of Montreal Canada Bank
    1818 J. Henry Shroeder Bank Germany Private
    1820 Nordea Sweden Bank
    1822 DnB NOR Norway Bank
    1824 Algemene Bank Nederland (now ABN AMRO) Netherlands Private
    1828 Centreville Bank USA Bank
    1832 Scotiabank Canada Bank
    1839 Hambros France Bank
    1848 Lazard USA Bank
    1850 HSBC Hong Kong Bank
    1854 Swiss Bank Corporation (now UBS AG) Switzerland – Private
    1856 Credit Suisse Switzerland Private
    1860 J. P. Morgan (now JP Morgan Chase Bank) USA – Private
    1863 Crédit Lyonnais (now Credit Agricole) France – Private
    1863/71 Amsterdam-Rotterdam Bank (now ABN AMRO) Netherlands — Private
    1864 Société Générale France – Private
    1870 Handlowy w Warszawie SA Poland Bank
    1870 Deutsche Bank Germany — Private
    1870 Chase National Bank (now JP Morgan Chase Bank) USA Bank
    1904 American Bank of Italy (Now Bank of America) USA Bank
    1912 Union Bank of Switzerland (now UBS AG) Switzerland – Private
    1913 Federal Reserve Bank USA – Private
    1930 Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Switzerland – Private

    The important pattern to note is the general groupings of dates of bank formation and their significance. The first is the formation of banks by English Protestants (Jesuit insiders) during the end of the 17th Century. This marks a watershed moment in the economic architecture of the first phase of the British Empire.

    The second pattern is the grouping of banks formed in the Netherlands and Switzerland just prior to the suppression of the Jesuits around 1767 by Portugal, Italy, France and Spain.

    The third pattern is the grouping of banks formed during the active suppression of the Jesuits and their war with the Vatican and Popes from 1773 to 1818 in the United States, Switzerland, Germany and the United Kingdom.

    This group of banks created during the Vatican-Jesuit War is probably the most historically influential, secretive, political of any group of banks in human history. Almost all of them have been implicated in an assortment of allegations from funding of wars, crimes against humanity, treason and money laundering.

    The Darier Hentsch & Cie Bank (1796, Switzerland) was the bank that happened to fund Napoleon his European Wars that saw the Papal States and influence of the Vatican crippled.

    The Rothschilds (1800, Germany) are famous for suddenly acquiring massive wealth almost overnight and then proceeding to fund numerous European Wars, Asian Wars including World War I.

    Barings Bank (1802, UK) is famous for organizing the purchase of Lousiana by the United States from Napoleon during his war with Britain.

    City Bank of New York (now CitiBank) (1812) is famous for helping finance the North side of the Civil War, US involvement in World War II, US business in Nazi Germany and US involvement in World War II.

    J. Henry Shroeder Bank (1818, Germany) is famous for being the almost exclusive bank for the Nazis.
    Of the top 20 banks of the world today, over half originate from the period 1760 to 1860 which saw the Jesuits disperse the massive wealth of the Catholic Church to all parts of the globe, especially great influxes into the United States.

    In terms of Private Banks, in 1986, the total asset value held was said to be US$4,300 Billion. In 1997, the figure has more than doubled to $10,000 Billion. In year 2000 alone, the figure hit $13,600 Billion trillion, and is currently still growing at a rate of 30 percent per year. The current estimate of total asset value of deposits held by private banks is around $17,000 Billion.

    Indirectly, the most valuable banking investment of the Roman Catholic Church is its investment control of the Federal Reserve Banks of the United States.

    Through a highly complex arrangement of small holdings across sometimes thousands of banks and cross-ownership holdings hiding foreign ownership, the Catholic Church has effectively controlled the Federal Reserve Bank and therefore the destiny of the United States economy since the turn of the 20th Century.

    The Catholic Church has only ordered the complete pulling of the plug of the United States economy once in 1929 to the early 1930’s effectively grinding the economy to a halt during the Great Depression along with Europe.

    While an extremely high risk strategy that could have caused another Civil War in the United States, the action was necessary to generate suitable conditions of poverty in Europe for the rise of Catholic appointed dictators in Germany, Spain, Italy as well as South America. Without the deliberate action of the Catholic controlled banks, the Great Depression would not had happened and by default World War II would not have taken place.

    Since its formation, only one President of the United States –a Catholic himself –has attempted to override the power of the Federal Reserve and the Roman Catholic Church by ordering the US Treasury to print its own money. The money was destroyed the day after he ceased to be President. His name was John F. Kennedy.

    Putting all this together, you can see that there is a lot more to who actually controls the wealth of the world and the actions they dictate from time to time that affect whether we will have a job, a home and food to eat.

    At the very least we can blame the US Federal Reserve in part –also realizing that this organization remains essentially a set of private trusts holding the US public and the world to ransom with its decisions. Indeed, it is an institution heavily influenced by its Roman Catholic masters.

    Yes, collectively we all borrowed too much money. But in reality all we did was ask for a little of the massive wealth stolen and held by others such as the Vatican and the Jesuits to flow through their banks and into our pockets. We weren’t really borrowing, just finding a way to get back some of what is rightfully ours in the first place.
    The subprime crisis should never have happened. The Federal Reserve could have easily contained the problem and stopped it in 2008. Instead, against all logic they let it get substantially worse.

    • But remember the Catholic Church, or the Papacy was infiltrated by Jewish Jesuits over 600 years ago. Basically, Catholicisim is run by criminal Jews and has been for hundreds of years. The church and its faith was destroyed with Vatican II.

  3. Reblogged this on The Stoker's Blog and commented:
    Nope, the author of the piece misunderstands Apartheid. What we have here in RCE/TA is a long planned, aided by Kerry et al, divorce from the inconvenient west, What we have is a piece of grit around which a rallying of primitivism is being orchestrated and the retarded mind of money being cross bred again.

    Apartheid was never so stone age.

Comments are closed.