Meet the Kagans: One of the most dangerous Jewish families in the U.S. government and other business

Seeking War To The End Of The World

Submitted by Robert Parry, via The Ron Paul Institute for Peace & Prosperity,
undefined

If the neoconservatives have their way again, US ground troops will reoccupy Iraq, the US military will take out Syria’s secular government (likely helping Al Qaeda and the Islamic State take over), and the US Congress will not only kill the Iran nuclear deal but follow that with a massive increase in military spending.

Like spraying lighter fluid on a roaring barbecue, the neocons also want a military escalation in Ukraine to burn the ethnic Russians out of the east, and the neocons dream of spreading the blaze to Moscow with the goal of forcing Russian President Vladimir Putin from the Kremlin. In other words, more and more fires of Imperial “regime change” abroad even as the last embers of the American Republic die at home.

Much of this “strategy” is personified by a single Washington power couple: arch-neocon Robert Kagan, a co-founder of the Project for the New American Century and an early advocate of the Iraq War, and his wife, Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs Victoria Nuland, who engineered last year’s coup in Ukraine that started a nasty civil war and created a confrontation between nuclear-armed United States and Russia.

Kagan, who cut his teeth as a propaganda specialist in support of the Reagan administration’s brutal Central American policies in the 1980s, is now a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a contributing columnist to The Washington Post’s neocon-dominated opinion pages.

On Friday, Kagan’s column baited the Republican Party to do more than just object to President Barack Obama’s Iranian nuclear deal. Kagan called for an all-out commitment to neoconservative goals, including military escalations in the Middle East, belligerence toward Russia and casting aside fiscal discipline in favor of funneling tens of billions of new dollars to the Pentagon.

Kagan also showed how the neocons’ world view remains the conventional wisdom of Official Washington despite their disastrous Iraq War. The neocon narrative gets repeated over and over in the mainstream media no matter how delusional it is.

For instance, a sane person might trace the origins of the bloodthirsty Islamic State back to President George W. Bush’s neocon-inspired Iraq War when this hyper-violent Sunni movement began as “Al Qaeda in Iraq” blowing up Shiite mosques and instigating sectarian bloodshed. It later expanded into Syria where Sunni militants were seeking the ouster of a secular regime led by Alawites, a Shiite offshoot. Though changing its name to the Islamic State, the movement continued with its trademark brutality.

But Kagan doesn’t acknowledge that he and his fellow neocons bear any responsibility for this head-chopping phenomenon. In his neocon narrative, the Islamic State gets blamed on Iran and Syria, even though those governments are leading much of the resistance to the Islamic State and its former colleagues in Al Qaeda, which in Syria backs a separate terrorist organization, the Nusra Front.

But here is how Kagan explains the situation to the Smart People of Official Washington:

Critics of the recent nuclear deal struck between Iran and the United States are entirely right to point out the serious challenge that will now be posed by the Islamic republic. It is an aspiring hegemon in an important region of the world.

 

It is deeply engaged in a region-wide war that encompasses Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, the Gulf States and the Palestinian territories. It subsidizes the murderous but collapsing regime of Bashar al-Assad in Syria, and therefore bears primary responsibility for the growing strength of the Islamic State and other radical jihadist forces in that country and in neighboring Iraq, where it is simultaneously expanding its influence and inflaming sectarian violence.

The Real Hegemon

While ranting about “Iranian hegemony,” Kagan called for direct military intervention by the world’s true hegemonic power, the United States. He wants the US military to weigh in against Iran on the side of two far more militarily advanced regional powers, Israel and Saudi Arabia, whose combined weapons spending dwarfs Iran’s and includes – with Israel – a sophisticated nuclear arsenal.

Yet reality has never had much relationship to neocon ideology. Kagan continued:

Any serious strategy aimed at resisting Iranian hegemony has also required confronting Iran on the several fronts of the Middle East battlefield. In Syria, it has required a determined policy to remove Assad by force, using US air power to provide cover for civilians and create a safe zone for Syrians willing to fight.

 

In Iraq, it has required using American forces to push back and destroy the forces of the Islamic State so that we would not have to rely, de facto, on Iranian power to do the job. Overall, it has required a greater US military commitment to the region, a reversal of both the perceived and the real withdrawal of American power.

 

And therefore it has required a reversal of the downward trend in US defense spending, especially the undoing of the sequestration of defense funds, which has made it harder for the military even to think about addressing these challenges, should it be called upon to do so. So the question for Republicans who are rightly warning of the danger posed by Iran is: What have they done to make it possible for the United States to begin to have any strategy for responding?

In Kagan’s call for war and more war, we’re seeing, again, the consequence of failing to hold neocons accountable after they pushed the country into the illegal and catastrophic Iraq War by selling lies about weapons of mass destruction and telling tales about how easy it would be.

Instead of facing a purge that should have followed the Iraq calamity, the neocons consolidated their power, holding onto key jobs in US foreign policy, ensconcing themselves in influential think tanks, and remaining the go-to experts for mainstream media coverage. Being wrong about Iraq has almost become a badge of honor in the upside-down world of Official Washington.

But we need to unpack the truckload of sophistry that Kagan is peddling. First, it is simply crazy to talk about “Iranian hegemony.” That was part of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s rhetoric before the US Congress on March 3 about Iran “gobbling up” nations – and it has now become a neocon-driven litany, but it is no more real just because it gets repeated endlessly.

For instance, take the Iraq case. It has a Shiite-led government not because Iran invaded Iraq, but because the United States did. After the US military ousted Sunni dictator Saddam Hussein, the United States stood up a new government dominated by Shiites who, in turn, sought friendly relations with their co-religionists in Iran, which is entirely understandable and represents no aggression by Iran. Then, after the Islamic State’s dramatic military gains across Iraq last summer, the Iraqi government turned to Iran for military assistance, also no surprise.

Back to Iraq

However, leaving aside Kagan’s delusional hyperbole about Iran, look at what he’s proposing. He wants to return a sizable US occupation force to Iraq, apparently caring little about the US soldiers who were rotated multiple times into the war zone where almost 4,500 died (along with hundreds of thousands of Iraqis). Having promoted Iraq War I and having paid no price, Kagan now wants to give us Iraq War II.

But that’s not enough. Kagan wants the US military to intervene to make sure the secular government of Syria is overthrown, even though the almost certain winners would be Sunni extremists from the Islamic State or Al Qaeda’s Nusra Front. Such a victory could lead to genocides against Syria’s Christians, Alawites, Shiites and other minorities. At that point, there would be tremendous pressure for a full-scale US invasion and occupation of Syria, too.

That may be why Kagan wants to throw tens of billions of dollar more into the military-industrial complex, although the true price tag for Kagan’s new wars would likely run into the trillions of dollars. Yet, Kagan still isn’t satisfied. He wants even more military spending to confront “growing Chinese power, an aggressive Russia and an increasingly hegemonic Iran.”

In his conclusion, Kagan mocks the Republicans for not backing up their tough talk: “So, yes, by all means, rail about the [Iran] deal. We all look forward to the hours of floor speeches and campaign speeches that lie ahead. But it will be hard to take Republican criticisms seriously unless they start doing the things that are in their power to do to begin to address the challenge.”

While it’s true that Kagan is now “just” a neocon ideologue – albeit one with important platforms to present his views – his wife Assistant Secretary of State Nuland shares his foreign policy views and even edits many of his articles. As she told The New York Times last year, “nothing goes out of the house that I don’t think is worthy of his talents. Let’s put it that way.” [See “Obama’s True Foreign Policy ‘Weakness.’”]

But Nuland is a foreign policy force of her own, considered by some in Washington to be the up-and-coming “star” at the State Department. By organizing the “regime change” in Ukraine – with the violent overthrow of democratically elected President Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014 – Nuland also earned her spurs as an accomplished neocon.

Nuland has even outdone her husband, who may get “credit” for the Iraq War and the resulting chaos, but Nuland did him one better, instigating Cold War II and reviving hostilities between nuclear-armed Russia and the United States. After all, that’s where the really big money will go – toward modernizing nuclear arsenals and ordering top-of-the-line strategic weaponry.

A Family Business

There’s also a family-business aspect to these wars and confrontations, since the Kagans collectively serve not just to start conflicts but to profit from grateful military contractors who kick back a share of the money to the think tanks that employ the Kagans.

For instance, Robert’s brother Frederick works at the American Enterprise Institute, which has long benefited from the largesse of the Military-Industrial Complex, and his wife Kimberly runs her own think tank called the Institute for the Study of War (ISW).

According to ISW’s annual reports, its original supporters were mostly right-wing foundations, such as the Smith-Richardson Foundation and the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, but it was later backed by a host of national security contractors, including major ones like General Dynamics, Northrop Grumman and CACI, as well as lesser-known firms such as DynCorp International, which provided training for Afghan police, and Palantir, a technology company founded with the backing of the CIA’s venture-capital arm, In-Q-Tel. Palantir supplied software to US military intelligence in Afghanistan.

Since its founding in 2007, ISW has focused mostly on wars in the Middle East, especially Iraq and Afghanistan, including closely cooperating with Gen. David Petraeus when he commanded US forces in those countries. However, more recently, ISW has begun reporting extensively on the civil war in Ukraine. [See “Neocons Guided Petraeus on Afghan War.”]

So, to understand the enduring influence of the neocons – and the Kagan clan, in particular – you have to appreciate the money connections between the business of war and the business of selling war. When the military contractors do well, the think tanks that advocate for heightened global tensions do well, too.

And, it doesn’t hurt to have friends and family inside the government making sure that policymakers do their part to give war a chance — and to give peace the old heave-ho.

Baghdad in Ruins : A US-made Hell on Earth

WW~Notes: It’s been some time since I reported any news out of Iraq after the nearly 20 year devastation of that country by the Americans.  I know now that I have been affected deeply by the destruction, death, suicides, unnecessary murders of women and children both in Iraq and Palestine over the years since I began this blog.   I suffer from a profound depression because I live in the very nation perpetrating these horrible atrocities against innocent human beings.  I’ve mourned for every murdered child and their mothers because I know how I would feel if the same thing happened to my own child or now, my grandchildren who are under the age of 10.  How these desperate  people move on I have not a clue.  I feel like I would disintegrate into a puddle of death over the loss of my loved ones.  Their indomitable spirit should be a lesson to every American because our day is coming.  Not at the hands of the faux enemy but our own government.  The American government will be held accountable one day but that will be long  after they’ve murdered us.  It’s blood for blood and they will be called to account for their crimes against humanity by a much higher power than can be found on this ball of rock.  

Darkmoon has another poignant article about the devastation that still hangs over Baghdad and its people.


 

By Cathy Breen

Cathy Breen lived in Baghdad and saw all this happen,
with children dying all round her like flies.

1832196-3x2-940x627

AMERICA  DID  THIS

Two days ago an email came from an Iraqi doctor in Baghdad in response to a brief greeting I sent for the month of Ramadan.

“Thanks so much for remembering us…In fact we are the same if not worse.  Our hearts are broken at the organized ruining of our country.  We are targeted by those criminals and gangs coming from everywhere, even from the west who are all witnessing this drama and, if not supporting it, are keeping silent.  We wonder what sin we committed to face this gloomy black fate.  In fact, what is going on is beyond words. “

numbers05072006

The courageous woman doctor I mentioned above never left the side of gravely ill children despite the great exodus of doctors due to kidnappings, assassinations and threats to their lives and families.  Sadly she reports that another of her siblings has cancer, and she needs to leave the medical students for some days.  This happens she says regretfully in “the critical time of final exams.”   She herself is a cancer survivor and both her mother and sister had cancer.   They have no choice, she says, but to go on and try to survive.

Another long-time friend is working in southern Iraq in a job that will soon end.  He is away from his family in Baghdad, and it is dangerous for him in the south, but he has no choice with a wife and seven children to support.  There was already an assassination attempt on his life in Baghdad and houses near their own have been bombed.  There are nightly explosions and gunfire, assassinations and kidnappings.   Approximately 200 people across Iraq have been killed each day in this month alone.

We have been frantically trying to find a safe place for him and his family to escape to.  If they could go to Kurdistan they would join the ranks of the already three million IDPs (Internally Displaced Persons) within Iraq.  If they could get to Turkey, they might eventually get refugee status.  But it is expensive there, they don’t speak the language, are not allowed to work and resettlement could take years.  Our friend emailed that his wife decided to send their second oldest son, 16 years, to her mother’s house due to kidnapping cases.

“Two kids were kidnapped two days ago.”   Ali, I will call the son, has exams and his grandmother’s house is closer to the school.  When I stayed with this family for two weeks in 2013, one of Ali’s twelve year old friends was kidnapped and was never found.

pic

DEAD  IRAQI  CHILD
(See here)

The grandmother takes her grandson each day to school and sits against a wall under its shadow until Ali finishes his exam. She is “old and weak,” Ali’s father writes, “and honestly it is meaningless to think she could protect Ali as she can’t really protect herself.  But I do appreciate her efforts.”

Ali told his dad that his grandmother was causing him “too much embarrassment as she doesn’t understand the rules of the exams.”  She always tries to enter the exam class to give Ali cold water because it is very hot.  The first day the director of the exam allowed her to do this, but another day during the exam she tried again.  This time it was not to give him water.  She had cooked a rooster and told the staff that he had to eat well to do good on the exam!

Ali was a little bit angry but his love for her “let him forget the embarrassing feeling!”  He is “crazy in love” with his grandmother as she is the only grandparent left.

Ali was complaining to his father about the insufferable heat and lack of air cooling system, as well as the terrible mosquitoes.  He uses a kerosene lamp for studying at night.    The father was trying to encourage him by phone to overcome the difficulties saying: No pain, no gain.

Ali responded “Dad, since we opened our eyes in this life, we have only known pain.”

Just yesterday two civilians were killed as Ali and his grandmother approached the school.  This happened right in front of their eyes.   His father emailed: “Ali couldn’t answer exam well as he saw the accident.  Let us pray for his safety.”

Our friend and his wife worry excessively about their oldest boy, 18 years, as militia come to the houses seeking young men to fight ISIS, and they “will take young guys by force to do battle.”  Although this son is needed to guard the house at night and help his mother, the mother felt compelled to send this son away too.

My friend concluded:  “Cathy, It’s hard to sleep. Don’t worry. The family is still fine.”

iraq_dead_children_460_converted

EVERYTHING’S  FINE . . . THE DEAD ARE SLEEPING

Source

 

Nobel Peace Prize winners lie about the death toll in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan

teleSUR has just reported that 1,300,000 million died since the War on Terror began after September 11, 2001 in three countries. 

psyco3The 101-page report called “Body Count,” written by 1985 Nobel Peace Prize winners Physicians for Social Responsibility and by Physicians for Global Survival and International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, criticizes the mainstream media and the United States and its allies for grossly and intentionally underestimating death tolls in the three countries.

Well, I’m here to tell everyone that they grossly under estimated the Iraqi death toll severely.

Here is the article written in 2008 and posted on State of Nature that reported 2.2 million Iraqis alone had been massacred by the U.S. and her allies, mostly women and children.  I think these Nobel Peace Prize winners might want to give their numbers another shot and report the damn truth.

Whitewraithe~


US State Terrorism and the Iraqi Genocide

By Gideon Polya
January 22, 2008

“The ignoring, denial and obfuscation by mainstream media and politicians in the Western Murdochracies has continued as the estimates have steadily risen to a current estimate of 1.5-2 million post-invasion excess deaths.”

Introduction

We are approaching the end of 5 years of the illegal and war criminal Occupation of Iraq by the US-led Coalition. History ignored yields history repeated, and genocide ignored yields genocide repeated. It is accordingly important to assess the human and economic cost of the continuing Occupation of Iraq and indeed of the Bush “War on Terror” – or more accurately the Bush Asian Wars – of which it is a part. In short, as detailed in this article, the accrual cost of the Bush Wars is $2.5 trillion – $3.5 trillion; post-invasion excess deaths (avoidable deaths, deaths that did not have to happen) in the Occupied Iraqi and Afghan Territories total 1.5-2 million and 3-6 million, respectively; post-invasion under-5 infant deaths total 0.6 million and 2.2 million, respectively; refugees total 4.5 million and 4 million, respectively); and Gulf War Iraqi violent deaths, and excess non-violent Sanctions deaths and under-5 infant deaths under Sanctions (1990-2003) totalled 0.2 million, 1.7 million and 1.2 million, respectively. An extraordinary aspect of what must be described as the Iraqi Genocide and the Afghan Genocide is the massive ignoring of the carnage by the Mainstream media of the Western Murdochracies. [1]

The invasions of Afghanistan and then Iraq were triggered by the 9/11 atrocity of 2001, although 6 years after the event responsibility for this crime has yet to be established in a proper judicial process. Formerly US-funded (and for all we know, presently US-funded) Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda have been vilified by the egregiously dishonest administration as the perpetrators of the 9/11 atrocity but William Blum in his book Rogue State correctly describes this non-state terrorist leader thus: “Osama bin Laden – alleged to have been the mastermind behind the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States”. [2]

No less than the former 7-year President of Italy, law professor, senator-for-life and Western intelligence intimate Francesco Cossiga in a November interview with top Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera stated (a) that the US CIA and Israeli Mossad were responsible for 9/11 and (b) that major intelligence agencies were well aware of this. [3] Former President Cossiga’s “insider” opinion is certainly consonant with the serious objections of many scientists and scholars (notably those associated with Scholars for 9/11 Truth) to the extraordinarily implausible “official story” of the quite consistently dishonest Bush Administration. [4]

Consistent with these serious and expert suggestions of active or passive US complicity in 9/11, former US Vice President Al Gore in his book The Assault on Reason has castigated the Bush Administration for resolutely rejecting a wealth of intelligence advice about impending attacks before 9/11, an extraordinary pattern of behaviour that drew the following comment from the deficient 9/11 Commission and quoted in his book: “We have found no indication of any further discussion before September 11th between the president and his advisors about the possibility of a threat of Al-Qaeda attack in the United States.” [5]. Al Gore declines to go the extra step to the highly plausible theory of “passive complicity” (as was the US position over Pearl Harbor according to Japanese scholars), concluding: “Their behaviour, in my opinion, was reckless, but the explanation for it lies in hubris, not in some bizarre conspiracy theory … These affirmative and repeated refusals to listen to clear warnings constitute behaviour that goes beyond simple negligence. At a minimum, it represents reckless disregard for the safety of the American people”. [6]

Whoever was directly or indirectly responsible for the 9/11 atrocity it was certainly not the people of Iraq and Afghanistan, about half of whom are children, three quarters women and children and who have been subject to appalling genocide (as defined by the UN Genocide Convention) by the Bush Administration, by US state terrorism and its allies.

The US “Cover Story” for the Invasion of Iraq

Invasion and occupation of other countries violates the UN Charter and is a war crime. As reported by the UK Guardian (September 2004) the invasion of Iraq was illegal and breached the UN Charter: “The United Nations secretary general, Kofi Annan, declared explicitly for the first time last night that the US-led war on Iraq was illegal. Mr Annan said that the invasion was not sanctioned by the UN security council or in accordance with the UN’s founding charter. In an interview with the BBC World Service broadcast last night, he was asked outright if the war was illegal. He replied: ‘Yes, if you wish.’” [7]

As is now well-known, a series of assertions about pre-invasion Iraq – most notably possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) – were false, as summarized by Al Gore in Chapter 4 ‘Convenient Untruths’ of his book The Assault on Reason. [8] The awkward discrepancy between the “fanatical Islamic fundamentalist” (Iranian) and “dangerous Arab dictator” (Iraqi) American “threat cover stories” for war and occupation in the Middle East was finally resolved in the 21st century under the egregiously dishonest Bush Administration. Following the 9/11 atrocity in 2001, the US immediately launched the “War on Terror” – 9/11 was blamed on Afghanistan-based Al Qaeda’s “fanatical Islamic fundamentalists”, but a rapid escalation included Iraq with the utterly false complaint of complicity through (non-existent) Al Qaeda connections.

The evidently pre-planned invasion of Afghanistan commenced rapidly in 2001 with the justifying “cover story” of “Afghanistan failure to hand over (the formerly US funded) Osama bin Laden” (however sensible, peaceful negotiations would no doubt have secured this). The palpable falsity of the “Iraq-Al Qaeda links” story meant that the US spent over a year advancing a plethora of other false “stories” based on the “dangerous Arab dictator” scenario, namely “Iraqi possession of weapons of mass destruction, mobile germ warfare laboratories, ability to strike the West in 45 minutes, uranium supplies from Niger etc”. Nearly 5 years (and 1.5-2 million avoidable deaths later) these “stories” have been shown to be utterly false and the Iraqi reality is now one of a pro-Iranian fundamentalist Shi’ite Muslim political majority, secular Kurdish autonomy, secular Sunni disempowerment, overwhelmingly hated US occupation and a combination of secular Ba’athist Sunni, “fundamentalist” Shi’ite and Sunni and Al-Qaeda-type insurgency (“terrorism”) with significant US funding of violent militias. [9]

The Coalition Governments ignored advice over lack of hard evidence for WMD from Australian Lieutenant Colonel Andrew Wilkie (who resigned from his Australian Intelligence career over the issue), Scott Ritter (a former UN weapons inspector), Dr David Kelly (top UK WMD expert who apparently commited suicide but may have been murdered according to the UK newspaper reports) and from a chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix (Sydney Peace Prize recipient and who declared the Iraq War was illegal). [10]

Oil, Hegemony and Israel Were Actual Reasons for the Invasion

Noam Chomsky has concluded that “the huge energy resources of the region were recognized by Washington sixty years ago as a ‘stupendous source of strategic power,’ the ‘strategically most important area of the world,’ and ‘one of the greatest material prizes in world history.’ Control over this stupendous prize has been a primary goal of U.S. policy ever since, and threats to it have naturally aroused enormous concern.” [11] According to the Independent on Sunday (UK) “The Australian Defence Minister, Brendan Nelson has admitted that oil was a major factor in the government’s decision to keep troops in Iraq.” [12]

However Philip Zelikow, chairman of the 9/11Commission and Bush Administration intimate as former member of the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB), which reports directly to the president, in a 2002 address explicitly linked the invasion of Iraq to defence of Israel and increased Israeli security through the devastation and occupation of Iraq: “Why would Iraq attack America or use nuclear weapons against us? I’ll tell you what I think the real threat [is] and actually has been since 1990 – it’s the threat against Israel. And this is the threat that dare not speak its name, because the Europeans don’t care deeply about that threat, I will tell you frankly. And the American government doesn’t want to lean too hard on it rhetorically, because it is not a popular sell.” [13]

1.5-2.0 Million Post-invasion Violent and Non-violent Excess Deaths in Iraq

A fundamental measure of the impact of government policy is excess death (avoidable deaths, excess mortality, avoidable mortality, deaths that should not have happened) (see “Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950″). [14] Excess deaths in a country can be defined as the difference between the actual deaths in a country and the deaths expected for a peaceful, decently governed country with the same demographics. Excess deaths can be violent (e.g. due to bombs or bullets) or non-violent (e.g. due to deprivation and deprivation-exacerbated disease) – but in the last analysis, the end result is the same the culpability the same.

Accordingly, in assessing post-invasion excess deaths in Occupied Iraq we must consider violence-related post-invasion excess deaths and non-violent post-invasion excess deaths.

Recent authoritative estimates of violence-related post-invasion excess deaths in occupied Iraq (as of September 2007) are of 1.2 million (from the expert UK ORB polling company) [15] and 0.8 million (from the top US Bloomberg School of Public Health group at Johns Hopkins University who estimated 0.6 million violent deaths as of July 2006). [16] The prestigious US Just Foreign Policy organization estimates over 1.1 million post-invasion Iraqi deaths due to U.S. invasion [17].

Authoritative estimates of non-violent post-invasion excess deaths in Occupied Iraq as of September 2007 are of 0.7 million (from the latest UN Population Division data) [18] and of 0.8 million (calculated from United Nations Children’s Fund, UNICEF, data on post-invasion under-5 year old infant deaths [19]; for impoverished Third World countries the under-5 infant deaths are about 0.7 of the total excess deaths, as described in the MWC News article ‘Layperson’s Guide to Counting Iraq deaths’. [20]

We can now estimate total post-invasion violent and non-violent occupied Iraqi excess deaths and these clearly range from 0.7 million + 0.8 million = 1.5 million (minimum estimate) to 0.8 million + 1.2 million = 2.0 million (upper estimate). [21]

Iraqi Genocide

In addition to the 1.5-2 million post-invasion excess deaths (2003-2007) , the 0.2 million violent deaths in the Gulf War (1991), the 1.7 million excess deaths and 1.2 million under-5 infant deaths in the Sanctions War (1990-2003), UNICEF and UN Population Division data indicate 0.6 million post-invasion under-5 infant deaths (2003-2008). UNHCR [22] and the Brussells Tribunal [23] indicate 4.5 million Iraqi refugees (Iraq 2005 population 27 million). An insidious long-term impact is revealed by post-invasion increased cancer incidence in Occupied Iraq that has been related to war criminal spread of huge amounts of Depleted Uranium (DU) across Iraq. [24]

This overall atrocity constitutes genocide as defined by Article 2 of the UN Geneva Genocide Convention: “In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: a) Killing members of the group; b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.” [25]

Eminent scholars and writers who decry and use the terminology “Iraqi Holocaust” and/or an “Iraqi Genocide” include Dr Mark Weisbrot (President of Just Foreign policy) [26], Dr Paul Craig Roberts (eminent US writer, academic, editor and Father of Reaganomics) [27], and John Pilger (outstanding, award-winning Australian-UK writer and journalist). [28]

Genocide and Holocaust Ignoring, Obfuscation, Minimization and Denial

There has been gross ignoring and gross under-estimation of post-invasion excess deaths by Mainstream media and politicians. In response to expert estimates of “100,000 post-invasion deaths” in Occupied Iraq published by top US medical epidemiologists in the top medical journal The Lancet in 2004, the Bush and Blair Governments responded with bald denial. Indeed the ignoring, denial and obfuscation by mainstream media and politicians in the Western Murdochracies has continued as the estimates have steadily risen to a current estimate of 1.5-2 million post-invasion excess deaths.

Thus, in Australia, then Labor Leader of the Opposition, Kevin Rudd (and now PM after a landslide victory in November 2007), speaking to Parliament as reported on 14 February 2007 by the ABC PM program: “KEVIN RUDD: Prime Minister, given that another 100 Iraqi civilians will die today, adding to the 61,000 who have died so far, following his failed invasion in Iraq, when will the Prime Minister have the courage and the decency to admit that he has got this war radically wrong from day one?” [29]

Yet as of 19 August 2004, Mr Rudd was aware of horrendous passive mass murder of Occupied Iraqi infants alone of circa 0.1 million annually as revealed by the following e-mail he was sent (from me):

“Dear Mr Rudd, Please find below a DETAILED FORMAL COMPLAINT I have sent to all the major Federal and State Law Officers in Australia (and copied to politicians, media, NGOs etc) concerning Australian Federal Government complicity in war crimes in Iraq, namely (1) illegal invasion of a remote, non-threatening country and (2) horrendous mass mortality in an occupied country e.g. current under-5 infant mortality is estimated from UNICEF data to be about 100,000 per year in Iraq (population 24 million) as compared to 1000 in the “occupier” country Australia (population 20 million) – while annual per capita medical expenditure is currently US$40 in occupied, war-ravaged Iraq as compared to US$1000 in Australia. I would be very happy if you would disseminate this to all your colleagues and associates Yours sincerely, Gideon Polya [Attached below] Date: 17 August 2004 To: Federal & State Commissioners of Police, Solicitors General & Attorneys General From: Dr Gideon Polya Re: Complaint to Australian law officers about Australian Federal Government complicity in war crimes involving mass mortality, principally of children and in Iraq …” [30]

Al Gore is highly critical of the invasion and occupation of Iraq but follows the “concerned”, neo-Bush-ite path of hugely under-estimating the numbers of Iraqis killed as in the following quote: “he went to war virtually without clear thought and certainly without preparation for the aftermath that has tragically now claimed more than three thousand American lives and many tens of thousands of Iraqi lives.” [31]

It was estimated by Senator Rachel Siewert in a speech to the Australian Senate that up to 21,000 Iraqi infants may have died as a result of the Australian Wheat Board (AWB) diversion of A$300 million from the UN Oil for Food Program. [32] Iraqi litigation against both the Australian Government and AWB is contemplated. [33] Formal complaints over Australian war crimes in Occupied Iraq have been lodged by an individual (myself) with the International Criminal Court; the Chief Prosecutor of the ICC has indicated his preparedness to investigate state complaints against Bush and Blair. [34]

Indeed 2005 UK Nobel Laureate Harold Pinter in his acceptance speech advocated such prosecutions:

“The invasion of Iraq was a bandit act, an act of blatant state terrorism, demonstrating absolute contempt for the concept of international law. The invasion was an arbitrary military action inspired by a series of lies upon lies and gross manipulation of the media and therefore of the public; an act intended to consolidate American military and economic control of the Middle East masquerading as a last resort all other justifications having failed to justify themselves as liberation. A formidable assertion of military force responsible for the death and mutilation of thousands and thousands of innocent people. We have brought torture, cluster bombs, depleted uranium, innumerable acts of random murder, misery, degradation and death to the Iraqi people and call it ‘bringing freedom and democracy to the Middle East’. How many people do you have to kill before you qualify to be described as a mass murderer and a war criminal? One hundred thousand? More than enough, I would have thought. Therefore it is just that Bush and Blair be arraigned before the International Criminal Court of Justice.” [35]

My comment (as of January 2008) : 2 million? More than enough, I would have thought.

Western Murdochracies Lying by Omission over the Iraqi Genocide

Notwithstanding the matters outlined above, the Iraq War was studiously avoided during the recent Australian Federal Election after the manner of the John Cleese portrayal of Basil Fawlty in ‘Fawlty Towers’ and his injunction “Don’t mention the war”. In relation to Occupied Iraq, Australian mainstream media and politicians are wittingly or unwittingly involved in Holocaust Commission, Holocaust Denial, Genocide Commission, and Genocide Denial. The only Mainstream Australian publication reporting this carnage (to my knowledge) during the Australian election campaign was a book Lies, Deep Fries & Statistics edited by Australia’s top science journalist Robyn Williams and published by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (the ABC) [36] – it contained a chapter by me (just prior to chapters by top human rights lawyers, former Australian Attorney General Kep Enderby QC and Julian Burnside QC), entitled ‘Australian complicity in Iraq mass mortality’, this being the transcript of a nation-wide broadcast with the same title I had made in 2005. [37]

In an outrageous process of sustained holocaust ignoring and holocaust denial, mainstream Australian – and indeed Western – journalists and politicians resolutely ignore the carnage in the Occupied Palestinian, Iraqi and Afghan Territories where post-invasion excess deaths presently total 0.3 million, 1.5-2 million and 3-6 million, respectively; under-5 infant deaths total 0.2 million, 0.6 million and 2.2 million, respectively; and the refugees total 7 million, 4.5 million and 4.0 million, respectively. [38]

Holocaust denial in relation to the Jewish Holocaust (6 million deaths, including 1 million non-violent excess deaths) has been criminalized in a number of Western European countries (punished by up to 10 years’ imprisonment in Austria) and France and Belgium have recently criminalized denial of the Armenian Genocide. Indeed Germany has recently suggested extending EU legislation to criminalize denial or minimization of other contemporary holocausts and genocides. [39] This may prove to be a useful avenue for cessation of the carnage which depends on complicit mainstream media lying by omission.

Australia May Be a Weak Link in the War-criminal Western Murdochracy Chain

According to a 2007 survey by the US Studies Centre, University of Sydney, 67% of Australians polled opposed Australia’s presence in Iraq and 56% opposed Australia’s presence in Occupied Afghanistan. [40] As reported by the UK Independent on Sunday, “Australia, which continues to back the increasingly unpopular war, initially sent 2,000 troops. It still has 1,000 troops there, supported by 600 air force and navy personnel in the region.” [41]

The UK Guardian has reported that PM-elect Rudd will pull most but not all of Australia’s troops out of Iraq by mid-2008, leaving some hundreds behind; Rudd will soon meet Robert McCallum, the US ambassador to Australia, to discuss the precise timing of the withdrawal. Rudd admits that the presence of troops in Iraq has made Australia more of a target for terrorism; and he will keep Australia’s 1,000 troops in Afghanistan. The Rudd Government will consult with the US Ambassador about withdrawal but there was no indication of whether the Occupied Iraq Government would be consulted. [42] It now appears that a substantial body of Australian troops will leave in mid-2008 but hundreds will remain – ostensibly for “non-combat duties” but actually to keep the Americans happy as a continued premium payment on White Australia’s “American insurance policy” for protection against its #1 continuing nightmare of “Asian hordes”.

WorldPublicOpinion.org, an expert polling organization with an advisory board from top US universities and organizations, reported that as of September 2006: “a large majority of Iraqis – 71% – say they would like the Iraqi government to ask for U.S.-led forces to be withdrawn from Iraq within a year or less … support for attacks against U.S.-led forces has increased sharply to 61 percent …79 percent of Iraqis say that the United States is having a negative influence on the situation in Iraq … 77 percent of respondents say that the United States plans to have permanent military bases … 91 percent of Sunnis now say that they want the United States to withdraw within a year, including 84 percent of those in Baghdad … Large numbers say that the United States’ military presence is ‘provoking more conflict than it is preventing.’ This view is held by 78 percent overall, and by 82 percent of Shias and a near-unanimous 97 percent of Sunnis.” Also, a majority of all groups – “78% – believe that ‘If the new Iraqi government were to tell the United States to withdraw all of its forces within six months,’ the United States would refuse to do so.” [43]

The Iraq war is deeply unpopular in Australia – and this despite massive mainstream media lying about the actual excess deaths associated with conflict. When apprised of the carnage and the overwhelming Iraqi opposition to continued occupation Australians will be horrified and appalled by the huge reparations bill for which Australia is liable together with the other members of the Coalition. At US $1,000,000 per head, the reparations for 2 million post-invasion Iraqi excess deaths in an illegal war prosecuted on information known to be false will total $2 million million or $2 trillion.

Summary

There are many serious Iraq-related issues to be addressed in a resolute fashion in the Bush-ite and neo-Bush-ite Western Murdochracies, most notably the Holocaust Commission, Holocaust Denial, Genocide Commission, and Genocide Denial. There is urgent need for investigation and prosecution of Iraq-related Coalition crimes. Of crucial importance is the near-comprehensive, entrenched failure of mainstream media, politicians, academics and other public servants to tell the truth – lying by omission that represents a major threat to the security, health, wealth and reputation of the US Alliance countries as well as their victims.

In a recent carefully researched article published in January 2008 on Countercurrents and thence elsewhere, notably on Information Clearing House (ICH) I asked the question “How many kids will Bush America kill in 2008?” The answer is that Bush America will be responsible for (a) 850,000 excess deaths in US- or US surrogate-occupied Territories in 2008 (of whom well over 50% will be kids) and (b) 550,000 avoidable under-5 infant deaths in these Occupied Territories in 2008 or 550,000/365 = 1,500 avoidable under-5 year old infant deaths daily. [44]

Terrorism whether state terrorism or non-state terrorism is evil and repugnant.

Muslim-origin non-state terrorists have murdered 7,000 Western civilians in the last 40 years (including Israelis and assuming no US or Israeli complicity in 9/11 – ignoring the fact that in November 2007 former President and intelligence-intimate Francesco Cossiga of Italy announced unequivocally that 9/11 was due to the US CIA and Israeli Mossad and that major intelligence agencies are well aware of that). [45]

However the 21st century Bush Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have been associated (so far) with post-invasion excess deaths of 1.5-2 million and 3-6 million, respectively; post-invasion under-5 infant deaths of 0.6 million and 2.2 million, respectively; and refugees totalling 4.5 million and 4 million, respectively. The accrual cost of the Bush Asian Wars has been estimated by 2001 US economics Nobel Laureate Professor Joseph Stiglitz (Columbia) and Professor Linda Bilmes (Harvard) at $2.5 trillion (and a recent US Congress report has estimated it at $3.5 trillion) – with immense implications for domestic and international human survival. [46] From these authoritative figures Bush’s US is clearly the world’s #1 terrorist state and the current world’s #1 for mass murder and mass paedocide (mass infanticide, mass murder of children).

Silence kills and silence is complicity. Decent people are obliged to (a) inform others about huge abuses of humanity and (b) to act ethically (e.g. by boycotts) in all their avoidable dealings with those complicit in such atrocities.

I am merely ONE humanitarian voice and indeed am almost comprehensively ignored in my own country, Bush-complicit Australia (but with rare exceptions, e.g. the afformentioned talk, ‘Australian Complicity in Iraq Mass Mortality’, broadcast by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) Science Unit). However a search today (11 January 2008) on Yahoo for the words “how many kids Bush” yielded 150 million URLs of which #3 on page #1 was my article on ICH entitled ‘How Many Kids Will Bush America Kill in 2008?’

Decent anti-racist, anti-war, humanitarian folk can take heart from this example and follow this example. They can write, talk, lecture, comment, and protest against the continuing mass murder of Muslim children by the Bush-ite Western Murdochracies. Further, prompted by the example above of three eminent writers (Dr Mark Weisbrot, Dr Paul Craig Roberts and John Pilger), subscribing to the concepts of “Iraqi Genocide”and/or “Iraqi Holocaust”, they can also attempt (for example, via so many “degrees of separation”) to get EMINENT PEOPLE from all walks of life in the Western Murdochracies and elsewhere to use this exact terminology in publicly opposing this utterly unacceptable, horrendous, ongoing atrocity.

Thou shalt not kill children.


Endnotes

1. Gideon Polya, ‘Two Million Iraq Deaths, 8 Million Bush Asian Holocaust Deaths and Media Holocaust Denial’, Countercurrents, 2007;
http://www.countercurrents.org/polya071007.htm
Polya, ‘Rudd Australia Report Card #1: Continued Australian and US Coalition War Crimes in Occupied Iraq’, Bellingen Institute, 2007;
http://www.bellingeninstitute.com.au/media.php?action=fullnews&id=54
Polya, ‘Rudd Australia Report Card #3: Continuing Australian Complicity in Bush US State Terrorism & Afghan Genocide’, Bellingen Institute, 2008.
http://www.bellingeninstitute.com.au/media.php?action=fullnews&id=55

2. William Blum, Rogue State, 3rd edn. (London: Zed Books, 2006).

3. Polya, ‘Were US & Israel behind the 9/11?’, MWC News, 2007;
http://mwcnews.net/content/view/18569/26/
‘Francesco Cossiga’, Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francesco_Cossiga

4. Scholars for 9/11 truth and Journal of 9/11 Studies;
http://www.s911t.org/
see also George Washington’s blog, ‘Highly Credible People Question 9/11′.
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/06/media.html

5. Al Gore, The Assault on Reason (London: Bloomsbury, 2007), 180.

6. Gore, The Assault on Reason.

7. Ewen MacAskill & Julian Borger, ‘Iraq War Was Illegal and Breached UN Charter, Says Annan’, Guardian, UK, September 2004.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1305709,00.html

8. Gore, The Assault on Reason.

9. Polya, Body Count: Global Avoidable Mortality since 1950 (Melbourne: G.M. Polya, 2007).
http://mwcnews.net/content/view/1375/247/ and http://globalbodycount.blogspot.com/

10. Gore, The Assault on Reason; Anne Penketh & Andrew Grice, ‘Blix: Iraq War Was Illegal, Blair’s Defense is Bogus, Says Former UN Weapons Inspector’, Commondreams, 2004.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0305-01.htm

11. Noam Chomsky, ‘Imminent Crises: Threats and Opportunities’, Monthly Review, Vol. 59 (2), 2007.
http://www.monthlyreview.org/0607nc.htm

12. Kathy Marks, ‘Australian Troops in Iraq “Because of Oil”‘, The Independent, UK, 2007.
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/australasia/article2739741.ece

13. Emad Mekay, ‘IRAQ: War Launched to Protect Israel – Bush Advisor’, Commondreams, 2004.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0329-11.htm

14. Polya, Body Count.

15. ORB, ‘More than 1,000,000 Iraqis Murdered’, Opinion Research Business press release, 2007;
http://www.opinion.co.uk/Newsroom_details.aspx?NewsId=78
Polya, ‘ORB Survey and 1.2 Million Iraqi Deaths Ignored by Australian and Anglo-American Media’, Countercurrents, 2007.
http://www.countercurrents.org/polya190907.htm

16. Gilbert Burnham, Riyadh Lafta, Shannon Doocy & Les Roberts, ‘Mortality after the 2003 Invasion of Iraq: A Cross-sectional Cluster Sample Survey’, The Lancet, October, 2006.
http://www.thelancet.com/webfiles/images/journals/lancet/s0140673606694919.pdf

17. Just Foreign Policy.
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/iraq/iraqdeaths.html

18. United Nations Population Division.
http://esa.un.org/unpp/

19. UNICEF.
http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/index.html

20. Polya, ‘Layperson’s Guide to Counting Iraq Deaths’, MWC News, 2006;
http://mwcnews.net/content/view/5872/26/
re-published as ‘Iraq and Afghansitan: How Many Dying?’, in Ken Coates, ed., Haditha Ethics (Nottingham: The Spokesman for the Bertrand Russel Peace Foundation), 78-80.

21. Polya, ‘Iraq: Genocide by all Definition’, MWC News, 2007.
http://mwcnews.net/content/view/17066/42/

22. Associated Press, ‘Nearly 4.5 Million Displaced and Refugees in Iraq, Says UNHCR’, International Herald Tribune, 2007.
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/10/23/news/UN-GEN-UN-Iraq-Refugees.php

23. Brussels Tribunal.
http://www.brusselstribunal.org/

24. Souad N. Al-Azzawi, ‘Depleted Uranium Radioactive Contamination In Iraq: An Overview’, presented at The 3rd ICBUW International Conference Hiroshima, August 3-6, 2006.
http://www.brusselstribunal.org/DU-Azzawi.htm

25. Yale University, Cambodian Genocide Program.
http://www.yale.edu/cgp/genocide.html

26. Mark Weisbrot, ‘Holocaust Denial, US Style’, AlterNet, 2007.
http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/68568/

27. Paul Craig Roberts, ‘Blackwater Security, Bush’s Private Waffen SS: The Iraqi Genocide’, Counterpunch, 2007.
http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts10162007.html

28. John Pilger, ‘The Forgotten Fallen’, New Statesman, 2007.
http://www.newstatesman.com/200711150033

29. Kevin Rudd to Parliament, reported on ABC Radio National PM Program, 14 February 2007.
http://www.bellingeninstitute.com.au/media.php?action=fullnews&id=54

30. Polya, ‘Rudd Australia Report Card #1′.

31. Gore, The Assault on Reason, 114.

32. Polya, ‘Australian Green Senator Exposes Human Cost of AWB Iraq Kick-back Scandal – 21,000 Iraqi Infant Deaths’, Newsvine, 2006.
http://gpolya.newsvine.com/_news/2006/03/08/124591-australian-greens-senator-exposes-human-cost-of-awb-iraq-kick-back-scandal-21000-iraqi-infant-deaths
http://www.newsvine.com/awb

33. ‘Thousands Could Join AWB “Genocide” Law Suit’, News.com, 2007.
http://www.news.com.au/business/story/0,23636,22432183-462,00.html
http://www.newsvine.com/awb

34. Polya, ‘Formal Complaint to ICC over Coalition War Crimes’, MWC News, 2005;
http://mwcnews.net/content/view/3087/247/
see Gethin Chamberlain, ‘Court Can “Envisage” Blair Prosecution’, UK Telegraph, 2007.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/18/nirq118.xml

35. Harold Pinter, ‘Art, Truth and Politics’, Nobel Prize acceptance Speech, Countercurrents, 2005.
http://www.countercurrents.org/arts-pinter081205.htm

36. Polya, ‘Australian Complicity in Iraq Mass Mortality’, in Robyn Williams, ed., Lies, Deep Fries & Statistics (Sydney: ABC Books, 2007).

37. Polya, ‘Australian Complicity in Iraq Mass Mortality’, ABC Radio National, Ockham’s Razor talk, 2007.
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/science/ockham/stories/s1445960.htm

38. Polya, ‘State Terrorism: “Genes and Memes” Painting & the New Barbarism’, MWC News, 2007;
http://mwcnews.net/content/view/18122/42/
Polya, ‘Rudd Oz Honeymoon Over before It Began’, MWC News, 2007.
http://mwcnews.net/content/view/18458/42/

39. Polya, ‘Genocide Denial: No-penalty Criminalization Required Now’, MWC News, 2007.
http://mwcnews.net/content/view/12483/26/

40. Murray Goot, ‘No Matter How You View It, Bush Is on the Nose’, The Australian, 2007.
http://sydney.edu.au/us-studies/docs/Survey_Murray_OpEd.pdf

41. Marks, ‘Australian Troops’.

42. Barbara McMahon, ‘Rudd Sets Date for Iraq Pull-out’, Guardian, 2007.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2220119,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=networkfront

43. ‘Most Iraqis Want U.S. Troops out within a Year’, WorldPublicOpinion.org, 2007.
http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/home_page/250.php?nid=&id=&pnt=250&lb=hmpg1

44. Gideon Polya, ‘How Many Kids Will Bush America Kill in 2008?’, Countercurrents, 2008.
http://www.countercurrents.org/polya050108.htm
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19026.htm

45. Polya, ‘Were US & Israel behind the 9/11?’.

46. Polya, ‘The Cost of War: $2.5 trillion – Accrual Cost of Bush War on Women & Children’, MWC News, 2007;
http://mwcnews.net/content/view/13099/26/
Jim Lobe, ‘Politics-US: Dems Put War Costs at 3.5 Trillion through 2017′, IPS News, 2007.
http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=40043

Source: http://www.stateofnature.org/?p=6238

Hollywood lies again about new film AMERICAN SNIPER

WW~Notes:  Back in 2012 Joe Cortina wrote a blistering review of just who exactly was Chris Kyle and his villainous exploits in the middle east.  Hollywood promotes this murderer as a hero saving hundreds of lives but he snuffed out thousands more innocents than he ever saved.  Here is the article from INCOGMAN’S site.


 

Cortina Blasts Navy Seal Sniper Chris Kyle

OPEN LETTER TO WAR CRIMINAL CHRIS KYLE – WORLD’S WORST HUMAN BEING – AUGUST 2012

By Joe Cortina

To my readers – This will be the first in a series I will be doing a monthly basis of expose’s on the most horrible Godless scum I can find.

This month’s smegma award for the most putrid rancid demonic sub-human piece of crap in the world is Navy Seal sniper Chris Kyle. This pig faced red neck will be able to look forward to eternity in Hell for his crimes against humanity.

You are such an evil reprobate wicked sadistic sick twisted sociopathic punk – it is hard to know where to begin. I have read some excerpts from your putrid disgusting book which is a chronicle of your sadistic murderous killing sprees of innocent men women and children patriots whose crime was trying to defend their OWN country family and dignity from the World’s largest institutionalized terrorist group – the jew occupied imperialist US MILITARY.

To you, new readers – I am not a mal-content leftist commie. I served my country with honor in one of our elite branches as a Special Operations Paratroop commander. I also trained basics at the USATC and was the youngest company commander on record there according to the PIO. I also trained Marines and Seals in ‘Green Beret’ unconventional airborne operations.

I was also a foreign diplomat (Vice Consul) for 5 years – as well as a NASA project aerospace engineer who did materials certification and troubleshooting for projects ranging from early re-entry vehicles to Polaris (submarine) missile guidance systems. I am a commercially rated pilot as well as a PADI scuba instructor.

Now back to the pig faced scumbag du-jour who this article is dedicated to. I love children – you dirt bag – and have sons and granddaughters – and love them no less than the patriot parents of the Afghan and Iraqi children you brag about murdering. Your book reveals your TRUE racist redneck mentality. What was your favorite racial epitaph against these poor people – dirt bag? Was it “dune coon or rag head or camel jockey” or a new one.

You sick psychopaths are ALL the same – and I have seen so many of you. You are bullies drunkards stupid uneducated racist violent degenerate moral cowards whose thrills are inflicting as much pain and terror and humiliation on your defenseless victims as possible. By your OWN sick twisted admission – murdering some terrified child was fair game as long as they were “rag heads” – isn’t that true – scumbag?

You ‘defended’ NOTHING – asshole! You got your license to kill innocent people – ” KILL EVERY ONE FROM 16-65? – isn’t that what you did – you murdering filthy animal! You considered ANY human being that was not one of your precious jack-booted murdering psychopath assassins – even women especially pregnant ones – isn’t that right – pig face?

IDF SNIPER MONTAGE REDO - XPRT
T-shirts worn by Israeli snipers. Ever wonder why the Palestinians are willing to blow themselves up to get back at the Jews? You would too, if one of your loved ones was shot out of the blue by these non-Jew haters. Happens all the time. [INCOG]

What a big brave man! Wow – a wannabe cowboy and bronco rider from Texas no less. IF – in fact YOU are the quintessential example of what is considered a ‘man’ in Texas – then the first bomb dropped here should be reserved to ‘flush that toilet’ from this land.

YOU – Godless dickwad – are the EXACT profile of who will be murdering their own neighbors right here in the USA. you fit the profile of those scum from 29 Palms who admitted they would murder their OWN neighbors if asked to by the ‘authorities’ – just like the USSR -right buddy?

Sick degenerate twisted sadistic sociopaths like you are the greatest threat to the safety of MY people and to WORLD peace that ever existed. Your imbecile child like brain – like all moron rednecks – is suited only for violence murder and terror! As old as I am – if I could defend my country by fighting demonic retards like you – I would make the sacrifice in a heartbeat.

Criminals like you are an embarrassment to every decent man woman and child on EARTH – especially those veterans who served during my era – REAL men like Bo Gritz and David Hackworth.

I served over a half century ago when we were a decent moral Godly people and our military was honorable. Our purpose was the D-E-F-E-N-S-E of my country – and N-O-T being murderous imperialistic war criminals who trained your sons to become murderers and kill innocent people who had NEVER EVER attacked me or my family or my country in ANY WAY WHATSOEVER!

You boast that the proceeds from your new redneck hate book are to go to the widows and orphans of fellow seals. You stinking filthy hypocrite! YOU personally – you sadistic prick – are responsible for HUNDREDS of innocent widows and children. NONE Of these murdered people or their families EVER did you ANY harm. They were simply defending THEIR homes and families against an aggressor force of Godless soulless scum!

You want to be a REAL man? Fall on your knees and beg our Lord forgiveness for the unspeakable crimes you have committed. THEN – announce that the profits will go to the orphans and widows of the innocent brave patriot parents you MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD – not the criminals who murdered them – you idiot!

Remember this day. I PROMISE that you WILL be haunted by the spirits of the countless innocent victims living and murdered will come back in your dreams to haunt you. You are not human. You are a MONSTER!

If my children or grandkids were raped or tortured or brutalized or murdered by aggressor scum like you – I would use my last breath to avenge their suffering and death. According to you – for defending MY OWN HOME – MY OWN FAMILY – MY OWN COUNTRY – I would be “SAVAGE – and DESPICABLE – and EVIL”. Isn’t that EXACTLY what you stated – your stinking Godless piece of shit hypocrite.

AND my murdered children and family would be according to YOUR morality and wisdom – nothing more than “BUGSPLAT” – isn’t that ALSO TRUE , you imbecile inbred oyster brained moron?

I took an oath on the Book of God when I became a soldier – just like you did – only I kept mine! Do you know what the motto of my branch unit is – scumbag? It says: ‘DE OPPRESSO LIBER’. Can you little tiny child’s brain tell me what that sacred Special Operations banner means? Of course not. Let me spell it out for your sick twisted racist bigot hate filed brain. It means: ‘TO LIBERATE FROM THE OPPRESSED”

Soulless Godless sub-human knuckle dragging garbage like you – ARE THE OPPRESSOR! Do you get it yet. You have disgraced my uniform – you are a disgrace to my Republic – and you are a debasement and ignominy to ALL that is good compassionate honorable brave true and Godly in this life.

I was taught that death was better than dishonor. Scum like you consider HONOR a DIRTY word. that is the difference between you and your current ilk and the decent men I served with 2 generations ago.

May you rot in hell – as you certainly WILL. When you die – thousands of decent human beings will rejoice. Don’t worry about the worms in the grave – child killer – You are so filthy nasty putrid that there are some things that even a maggot will not touch.

==============================================================

My name is Joe Cortina. I was a 60s Green Beret commander and a representative for IBM as well as a scientist for Honeywell Aerospace in Florida. I later became President of my own manufacturing company. I have two sons and 2 granddaughters who are the reason for my dedication to expose the threats to the freedoms I hope to see them enjoy as I did many decades ago when America was still a Christian-based sovereign nation free of Zionist influence.

Book Of John Chapter 8 – as Christ damns the Jews ( and NOT JUST THE HIGH PRIESTS AND Pharisees – see notes below)

” Ye do the deeds of your father (the devil). If God were your father. ye would love me; for I proceed forth and came from God: neither came I of myself, but He sent me.”
” Ye are of your father the devil and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie – he speaketh of his own; ( the Jews) for he is a liar, and the father of it”

“That this SATANIC FATHERHOOD cannot be limited to the Pharisees is MADE CLEAR in 1 John 3;8-10?
Matthew 23:15? Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when he becomes one, you make him twice as much a son of hell as you are.

“You serpents, you generation of vipers, how can you escape the damnation of hell?” (Jesus – to the Jews; in Matthew 23:33)

“My opinion of Christian Zionists? They’re scum. But don’t tell them that. We need all the useful idiots we can get right now.” — Benyamin Netanyahu, at the time a former IsraHELL prime minister

“There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people“
Jeremiah – 7 -16 God speaks to the prophet regarding the Jews: “Therefore do not pray for this people, nor lift up a cry or prayer for them, nor make intercession to Me; for I will not hear you.

INCOG NOTES

Chris Kyle appears to be exactly the kind of murderous, arrogant psychopath, Satanic Jewry would love to employ against true patriots of the USA and the forces of good. I know that sounds high-falutin’ and all, but I sincerely believe that, so I say so right here.

I publish Joe’s piece on my site to alert as many good people as possible to this sick SOB working for Satanic Zionism. Let no man say INCOG only talks about subversive Jewry and the criminal, spoiled “African-Americans.”

Let me also state for the record something else: Any man can take a weapon and use it to kill. Hell, it’s not so hard to squeeze off a powerful round with a beautifully engineered modern rifle and hit something far off into the distance. It’s the character of the person behind the high-priced scope — who he’s fighting against and what he’s willing to die for that’s the most important thing.

It’s called “character” for a reason, and I do believe everyone knows exactly what I’m talking about.

Being a sniper for the forces of Zionist evil is nothing at all to brag about. Our soldiers have been hoodwinked by Jewish media all their lives and unfortunately may not know it. Probably even the Vietnam war was used by International Banking Jews to suck money out of taxpayers in the USA; like the Muslims of today, dead Americans and Vietnamese — civilians or soldiers — meant JACK to this evil octopus.

INCOG MAN will never belong to the dishonorable slime that believes “the ends justify the means.” I’ll go down fighting into the “belly of the beast,” if necessary, but never, ever will I purposefully target a non-combatant, if at all possible. There’s a subtle importance here that my poor choice of words can’t convey, but the good will already know inside.

My hat’s off to JOE CORTINA for being a man of honor and patriot.


How much do you want to bet some phony patriot Jewboy in America did this artwork? These psycho Zionist traitors are clearly egging on the people of the US into wars against the enemies of Israel, plain and simple.


Addendum:

Chris Kyle: Ex-US Navy Seal Sniper Shot Dead

The author of the best-selling book, American Sniper, is reportedly killed alongside another man at a shooting range in Texas.

09:50, UK, Sunday 03 February 2013

Sniper Chris Kyle

Chris Kyle wrote about his military service from 1999 to 2009

A 25-year-old man has been charged with murder in connection with a shooting at a Texas gun range that killed former Navy Seal sniper Chris Kyle and his friend.

Sergeant Lonny Haschel, of the Texas Department of Public Safety, said in a news release that Eddie Ray Routh of Lancaster, Texas, was arraigned on two counts of capital murder.

Sgt Haschel said Erath County Sheriff’s deputies found the bodies of Mr Kyle, 38, and Chad Littlefield, 35, on Saturday at the Rough Creek Lodge shooting range, about 50 miles (80 km) southwest of Fort Worth.

Police said Routh opened fire on Mr Kyle and Mr Littlefield, and then fled in a pickup truck. He was later arrested near his home in Lancaster after a brief pursuit.

Officer Kyle Roberts at the Erath County Jail said Routh is being held on a combined $3m bond.

The motive for the shooting remains unclear.

Mr Kyle, a decorated soldier, wrote the best-selling book, American Sniper: The Autobiography of the Most Lethal Sniper in US Military History, detailing his 150-plus kills of insurgents from 1999 to 2009.

According to promotional information from book publisher William Morrow, Mr Kyle was deployed to Iraq four times.

The former Navy Seal helped start the non-profit FITCO Cares, which provides at-home fitness equipment for emotionally and physically wounded veterans.

Travis Cox, the organisation’s director, told the AP news agency that Mr Kyle and Mr Littlefield had taken Routh – who he described as a veteran “struggling” with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder – to the gun range.

He said: “What I know is Chris and a gentleman – great guy, I knew him well, Chad Littlefield – took a veteran out shooting who was struggling with PTSD to try to assist him, try to help him, try to give him a helping hand and he turned the gun on both of them, killing them.”

Routh then took Mr Kyle’s truck and fled, Mr Cox added.

Mr Kyle is survived by his wife, Taya, and their children, the non-profit’s release said.

He was sued by former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura – a former professional wrestler and Navy Seal – over a portion of the book that claims Mr Kyle punched Mr Ventura in a 2006 bar fight over unpatriotic remarks.

Mr Ventura says the punch never happened and that the claim by Mr Kyle defamed him.

Source: http://news.sky.com/story/1046849/chris-kyle-ex-us-navy-seal-sniper-shot-dead

Texe Marrs – The US & Israeli Coup In Ukraine

WW~Notes: Topics discussed and a bombshell I was not expecting, so listen carefully:

Malaysian Airlines MH17, Ukraine, 9/11, Vladimir Putin, Israel, Homosexuality, Russian Orthodox Church, Controlled Media, Genocidal Judaism, Rothschild Banking Cartel, Palestinians, Benjamin Netanyahu, Foreign Policy Journal, Council on Foreign Relations, Josh Cohen, Jewish False Flag Operations, Jewish Neo-Nazis, Jewish Oligarchs, Soviet Union, Vladimir Lenin was a Jew, Trotzky was a Jew, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, American Yaakov Bleich is Chief Rabbi of Ukraine, Joe Biden, and much more.

Gordon Duff Exposed Once Again as a “Disinformation Agent” on the events of 9/11

The first article is from Gordon Duff, Senior Editor for Veterans Today, which I no longer use as a resource.  The only reason for copying the material is to illustrate Duff’s disinformation tactics according to Bollyn.

Whitewraithe~

Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed

9/11 test.

9/11 test.

Russia Opens Files on Nuclear 9/11 and Israeli Proliferation

Gordon Duff, Senior Editor

The report below is taken from an intelligence dump by Russian sources.  As the origin is from an intelligence agency in the form of a “leak,” there are always questions.  Thus far, we have found not only is the majority of the material confirmed but several solutions to serious problems involving 9/11 are included.

I have redacted little here.  However, this arrived with vast supporting documentation which can, in the future, be uploaded on SCRIBD for access. One key area is that the US had supplied Israel with surplus nuclear weapons. (Editor’s note:  We are advised that some of the documentation can never be uploaded or distributed for reasons that will be obvious.)

We have a very solid confirmation on this.  Back during the 1980s, Israel showed her inventory of Davy Crockett tactical nuclear warheads to one of our editors, who at the time was a senior NATO intelligence official.  These early “micro-nukes” were taken out of US inventory in 1978 and “disappeared.”

Nuclear “Test”

This highly classified report is being published unaltered except for bad machine translation errors being repaired.  My personal opinion is that this is NOT a disinformation piece but rather represents a significant breakthrough.  I believe that this is a rare glimpse behind the curtain.

I am publishing this for the use of those qualified to understand how little of this is really new.  Those things that are new are groundbreaking.  For those who find this all a bit over their heads, there is little I can do other than to let you know that this is the world “your elders” really live in and that you finally have a chance to look in mom and dads top dresser drawer.

______________________________________

The Dave Crockett

Too Classified to Publish

 

W48 – 155mm

According to a retired FXX agent specializing in Israeli counter intel: The type of nuclear devices used on 911 were a modified version of the W-54 nuclear artillery shells that were covertly provided to the Israelis between 1988 and 1998 from US surplus stockpiles illegally exported during the Bush/Clinton era.

Chemical analysis done by DOE Sandi was able to identify the chemical/radiation footprint or fingerprint of the warheads based on samples taken after 911 of the fallout at ground zero. (Editor’s note: Nuclear weapon use at ground zero is confirmed from multiple sources)

All plutonium based warheads have a chemical fingerprint that can identify the type of design and where the PU was made and how old it is. This was the 911 blackmail on Bush 1 and 2, the illegal transfer of surplus US nuclear weapons to the Israelis and why the continued cover up, along with the stolen gold and stock fraud that was going on Wall Street etc. According to file ENW57.pdf on page 66. (Editor’s note: Document received and confirmed)

Only a 2 kiloton device was needed to drop the buildings. A 2 kiloton device will produce a fireball of apx 150 to 200 feet in diameter at over 4000 degrees Centigrade. Just large enough to melt the I beams of the central core of the building and drop them in place. The light flash would last less than 1 second and primarily be in the UV light range. Overpressure would only be at 60PSI max and directed upwards with the blast. See underground effect.

Fallout would be minimal and located to within ground zero range only. Radiation would drop to acceptable levels within 72 hrs. after the blast. Most fall out was trapped in the cement dust thus causing all of the recent cancer deaths that we are now seeing in NYC amongst first responders. (Editor’s note: Consistent with site data)

High FluxIsotope Reactor Core – Cross Section

Melted steel and iron oxide or “nano thermite” is a byproduct of the very high gamma ray / Neutron flux induced into the central steel core. The radiation dissolves the steel into iron oxide consuming the carbon and silicone in the steel.

This explains the missing steel columns and the very important clue of the “vaporized’ 20 ton antenna tower atop the south tower. The upward blast of radiation literally vaporized it. Video evidence proves this to be true. (Editor’s note: Tower issue a vital one.)

The total XXOO data file from DOE Sandia on the 911 event is well over 72 MB. P.S. Snowden didn’t have a Q clearance so he missed this one. Carnaberry had a pretty good stash of documents on the subject. (All under the transit stuff.) The entire nuclear nonproliferation story of stolen nuclear material coming from Russia was an Israeli cover story to hide the original source of weapons material coming from the US stock piles. (Editor’s note: Fully confirmed)

Illegal distribution of US nuclear material to foreign allies was not limited to Israel. Virtually all NATO allies were in on this scam too. Dick Cheney was the bad guy on this one. Bush2/Cheney traded nuclear pits to foreign country as IOU’s in order to get what they wanted. Tom Countryman a well-known Israeli operative is curiously now in charge of N.N.P. at the State Department under Obama.(?) He was put there by Ram Emanuel.

Early Israeli core model – Vannunu photo

It appears that the weapon of choice for the Israelis were the W-54 and follow on series of nuclear pits taken from the Amarillo TX storage dump. This was what Carnaberry was working on for Bush senior in Houston.

A total of over 350 pits were transferred to the Israelis over a 10 to 20 year period of time. The W-54 type of pit design were the most desirable due to the 2 point implosion pit design. This is the easiest to re manufacture and modify as compared to other circular pit designs.

The pill shaped design of the W-54 type weapon contains over 1.5 times more plutonium than a standard pit. This would allow enough Plutonium to be recovered that was still of weapons grade use even after 32 plus years of age. Americium build up in the pit over time eventually makes the Pit unusable as a weapon so they have a limited shelf life based on how fast or slow the Plutonium was produce in the reactor at Stanford.

Usually it was about 150 days max. Irradiation time in the reactor during production determines the shelf life of the pit as weapons grade material. All of the micro nukes used by the Israelis are re-manufactured W-54 type series devices.

Khazelov confirmed this a micro nuke bombing

These devices were used in the Bali bombing and the London bombing and in Japan on their reactors. (Editor’s note: Nuclear weapon use in Bali confirmed) Also used in Damascus, Iraq and Afghanistan by the US. (Editor’s note: Multiple confirmation including site samples.)

These are stored in most Israelite embassies for ease of deployment. The one’s used on 911 were kept at the Israeli consulate in NYC until put in place. After 911 the FBI now checks all diplomatic pouches with a Geiger counter before entering or leaving the US. The South African weapons were also surplus W-54 artillery shells acquired from Israeli and final assembly and testing was done in South Africa with Israel assistance. (Editor’s note: This explains Pelendaba production issues.)

This was done because the Israelis needed a testing ground in order to make sure that there rebuilt weapons would work as designed. (Editor’s note: Testing on Sept. 22, 1979 multiple confirmations.) The North Korean weapons are also of the 155 mm artillery design as provided by Israel.

The true North Korean nuclear weapons program is based on nuclear artillery use and not missiles. The plan is to use a massive artillery barge on South Korea if war breaks out this include the use of small nuclear artillery shells to counter US tanks rockets and artillery.

The Saudi’s also have a stash of W-54′s acquired from the US under Bush2. (Editor’s note: Confirmed) The Israelis have also provided them to India, Brazil, China, Taiwan, Japan, North and South Korea etc. (Editor’s note: All but South Korea confirmed. Canada had been believed to be the source of Brazilian nuclear weapons.) Dimona is a standard 75 megawatt thermal open top reactor as used in France for their plutonium weapons production program, their version of Stanford (Editor’s note:  Probably “Hanford”).

Dimona – Israel

Due to over use as a fast breeder reactor by the Israelis, Dimona suffered a “steam explosion” IE a flash over indecent due to neutron criticality back in the late 1980′s under Bush 1. This shut down its operation for many years until repairs could be made.

It know only operates at very low power levels due to neutron absorption damage to the containment vessel. Now mainly use for isotope production. This forced the Israelis to turn to stolen nuclear stock piles from the US for the continuation of their nuclear program.

The Israelis knowing that the nuclear material that they had acquire only had a limited shelf life left before it was no longer usable as weapons grade then tried to dump it on the surplus market as fast as possible before it was of no use to them. So they dumped it on unsuspecting nations who would only sit on it and not be able to test it. These were the fissile tests in North Korea. (Editor’s note: Confirmed, multiple sources)

When everybody caught on to the scam such as Japan and Korea. (IE the Korean sub sinkings etc) they were angry because they paid big bucks for junk. This started a mini cold war with Israel and her old clients. However with micro nukes even as the plutonium ages it will still fissile producing a smaller size detonation well under 2 kiloton in size.

So they can still be used as small dirty bombs or as very small tactical nukes such as the nuclear artillery strikes on Damascus with rocket assisted W-54′s. (Editor’s note: Confirmed strike, May 4, 2013) On the W-54 pit design it is pill shaped and it is only about 4 inches in diameter and weighs about 24 pounds.

Most of the fuel is consumed in the plasma fire ball when detonated so there is very little plutonium fallout left to escape. If it is salted with other materials the fallout can be even reduced to lower levels such as in an enhanced radiation device or the so called neutron bomb. This is what was used on 911.

Falling man – 911

The primary purpose of the nuclear weapon used on 911 was to produce a massive Gama ray / neutron flux that would vaporize about 150 to 300 feet of 6 inch thick steal I beams that constituted the central core of the WTC buildings. This created a free fall event as seen on TV that day. (Editor’s note: Critical information here.)

The flash would be hidden from sight due to the underground detonation. Most of the light was in the non-visible light spectrum any way. Over pressure would be reduced to 6 psi due to the blast traveling up the central core and neutron radiation vaporizing the TV antenna at the top of the building as see on TV.

The fallout would be mainly vaporized concrete cement and iron oxide. This is why after 911 they told everyone on TV that the beta radiation burns that people were getting were due to the caustic cement dust and not due to the radiation effects from the radioactive cement fallout. (Editor’s note: Fully confirmed)

The iron oxide found all over the place was what was left of the steel I beams. This was the so called Nano Thermite that was found everywhere. Fallout was limited to a 1 mile area around down town NYC. See charts. (Editor’s note: Received)

Radiation decay was reduced to safe low levels after 72 hrs., (Editor’s note: Fully confirmed) outside of ground zero its self. This is why the area was blocked off from the public for 3 days after the event, in order to let the radiation drop to safe levels

Editing:  Jim W. Dean


Following is the response from Christopher Bollyn after receiving a letter from a concerned citizen about what Gordon Duff wrote in the opening article. WW~

Question:  Hi Christopher:

As you probably have seen, Gordon Duff has released a Russian intelligence report on 911 nukes which he believes is authentic:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/05/20/too-classified-to-publish-bush-nuclear-piracy-exposed/

The report states that a modified W-54 nuclear artillery shell type mini-nuke was used on 911. These devices were secretly handed off to Israel by Bush-Cheney. Israel in turn sold them to NATO countries. When exploded, these devices leave a chemical signature and can be traced. The article by Duff implies that the nano-thermite found in the dust was a bi-product of the gamma ray/ neutron flux acting on the steel to produce iron-oxide.

I was under the impression that the Jones investigation found unexploded red and grey super-thermite chips in the dust of 911. Am I correct in this? The recovery of manufactured chips is not addressed by Duff. Why not?

Frankly, I don’t care whether or not nukes were used in 911 but I don’t like it when critical information is omitted. Thank you for fact-checking this article and for sharing your findings with your readers.

Bollyn Responds:  More Guff from Gordon Duff

The Gordon Duff article, “Too Classified to Publish:  Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed”, edited by Jim W. Dean, is nothing but rank disinformation about what happened on 9-11.  Duff shows his true colors as an agent of disinformation when he writes, “My personal opinion is that this is NOT a disinformation piece but rather represents a significant breakthrough.”

Why is Duff doing this?  What is the point of this disinformation piece that is full of flagrant errors?  The obvious purpose is to simply confuse the reader about the importance of the discovery of active thermitic material in the dust of the destroyed World Trade Center.

The so-called “classified” material Duff cites begins by saying that nuclear devices were used on 9-11 and that these devices caused the “melted steel and iron oxide or ‘nano-thermite'”, which he goes on to say, “is a by-product of the very high gamma ray/Neutron flux induced into the central steel core. The radiation dissolves the steel into iron oxide consuming the carbon and silicone in the steel.”

At the end of the Duff/Dean piece of guff, it says:  “The iron oxide found all over the place was what was left of the steel I beams.  This was the so-called Nano Thermite that was found everywhere.”

There are so many flagrant errors about what was found in the 9-11 dust in this piece that it can only be described as intentional disinformation by Gordon Duff and Jim Dean at Veterans Today. They are promoting a piece that is so wrong about what was found in the dust that it sounds as if they have not even read the paper by Steven E. Jones and other scientists entitled “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe”.

Firstly, the active thermitic material that was found in the dust was a bi-layered material that was created using nano-technology.  It was most certainly not made by any nuclear device.

Secondly, iron oxide (rust) is one of the components of thermite, not one of the products.  A basic thermite reaction creates a great deal of heat, aluminum oxide (a white smoke), and molten iron.  What was found in great quantities in the dust of the World Trade Center was billions of very small molten iron droplets.  Iron oxide and nano-thermite are not the same thing at all, as the Guff piece suggests. 

I will address the errors found in this piece of disinformation in a separate article.  This article is intentional disinformation about what the evidence found in the dust indicates.  Gordon Duff has, once again, shown himself to be an agent of disinformation about the events of 9-11.


Gordon Duff: 9-11 Disinfo Toad

Updated June 2, 2014


DISINFO TOAD Gordon Duff of Veterans Today recently published an article that clearly exposes him as an agent of disinformation who is working to obscure the truth about what happened on 9-11.  Why is he doing this and who is he working for?

“About thirty percent of what is on Veterans Today is patently false. About forty percent of what I write is at least purposely partially false, because if I didn’t write false information, I wouldn’t be alive. I simply have to do that.”
– Gordon Duff, Senior Editor of Veterans Today

Source: “Gordon Duff is a Jewish Disinformation Agent”

disinformation – false information that is given deliberately, especially by government organizations
Source:  Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, 7th Edition, 2005

toad – a contemptible, detestable, or disgusting person


DETESTABLE DUFF – The fact that Gordon Duff is a “disinfo toad” is certainly no secret.  He has openly admitted that “about thirty percent of what is on Veterans Today is patently false” and that at least forty percent of what he writes is “purposely partially false”.  
Source: “Gordon Duff is a Jewish Disinformation Agent” (from 5:15 – 5:38)

Disinformation is defined by Merriam-Webster as “false information deliberately and often covertly spread (as by the planting of rumors) in order to influence public opinion or obscure the truth.”  Gordon Duff, senior editor of the website Veterans Today, published an article on May 20, 2014, that can only be described as rank disinformation that is meant to obscure the truth about 9-11.  To deliberately spread lies about what caused the deaths of thousands of people on 9-11 is an egregious and unforgivable offense.

The article, entitled “Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed – Russia Opens Files on Nuclear 9/11 and Israeli Proliferation” contains many flagrant errors as it pushes the idea that nuclear bombs were used to bring down the Twin Towers.  Duff claims the evidence of a bi-layered composite of super-thermite found in the dust of the towers was somehow produced by the nuclear explosion that destroyed the tower.


EVIDENCE OF EXPLOSIVE THERMITE – Chips of the active thermitic material found in the dust of the destroyed Twin Towers.  This material, which was manufactured using nano-technology, is extremely energetic and releases more energy per gram than all other known explosives used in demolition.

9-11 GUFF FROM GORDON DUFF

The Duff article, which was edited by Jim W. Dean, is so full of errors that it cannot be taken seriously, except perhaps as evidence of his role as an agent of disinformation about 9-11.  With this in mind, I wrote to Mr. Duff on May 23 to ask him why he had published this piece:

Dear Mr. Duff,

I am writing to ask you about your recent article, “Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed”.

Why did you publish this piece, which is clearly disinformation about 9-11, at this particular time? Who are you doing this for? I would think that this piece, which contains so many flagrant errors, clearly exposes you as an agent of 9-11 disinformation.

Can you explain why you published this article?

Christopher Bollyn

Gordon Duff responded the same day:

  chris,

of those involved in 9/11, you are one of the few who actually does work. of those involved in 9/11, i am the only one with a background in intelligence and who works actively in that area.

the piece, as published, is what was submitted. it, of course, debunks nanothermite, something the scientific community did years ago.

you see, i met the group working on nano-thermite, people well known to stephen jones, when they came to me for investment. their security officer, claudio d la’o, brought them to me.

no nanothermite was ever produced, a propellant with no production facility nor any purpose other than to replace the gun on the apache, something not done.

did you ever find the factory that you believe made it? I can give you several reasons you didn’t.

I believe that “nanothermite” is the creation of disinformation agents. others who believe have become proprietary and defensive.

this is the first material that has come from a national intelligence agency. it is a huge breakthru for us.

as you had found ‘9/11 truth’ totally stalled, over a decade now, hobbiests, freaks, shills, many of those, time wasters, i have long disassociated myself.

i am surprised at your accusation.  VT has done more real damage that all others combined, by such a margin it is not worth discussing. we are ‘the last man standing.’

you know, publishing books can be a problem. you take hits. i accept them. you don’t.

I also simply run with the best information I can get and have the facilities to investigate things. after all, i do run a company with both a counter-intelligence division and one that does international criminal investigations.

my chief of staff was attache to israel and had investigated dimona. he is far from my only personal source.

admit this, you would never have access to something like that. I admit that I am prevented from printing what I could.

accept that the sale of nuclear material by the bush family is real. accept other things you choose to.

doubt everything.

please note that i am not an internet person. i just returned from Africa, i have defense contracts there and the middle east. i have a scientific staff with full nuclear clearances (i dont have). my group has done security assessments at all our nuclear facilities.

i don’t look down on you but i do look down on most others and deeply resent them.

i have never spoken a word against you. i respect what you have done.

however, you have to admit that i have taken on more “risk” and been more confrontive than all combined. I do this, to an extent, because I am not entirely without some protecting and backing.

If you really think I can be “gotten to,” you have not been paying attention. you are attacking my analysis through a bizarre personal accusation not only without foundation but almost irrational.

do this: prove me wrong. show me a nanothermite factory. get me people who have handled tons of it. show me how it was applied and used.

duplicate your hypothesis experimentally.

The russians have done that.

g [Gordon Duff]

CHECKING THE FACTS

The obvious purpose of the Gordon Duff article is to try to deny the presence and role of thermite (super-thermite in particular) in the destruction of the towers.  The Duff piece contains so many errors that I am only going to point out those that pertain directly to the evidence of what happened on 9-11.

The Duff piece claims that nuclear devices were used on 9-11 and that these melted the “I beams of the central core” of the Twin Towers. 

Fact:  The core columns of the Twin Towers were box columns.  I don’t know what “I beams” he is talking about. The walls of the central box columns were 4 inches thick at the base and tapered to about 1/4 inch at the top of the towers.


The core box columns that held up the Twin Towers can be seen in this photo.  The box column in the center appears to have been cut with a steel-melting charge of thermite.

The Duff piece says:  “Melted steel and iron oxide or ‘nano-thermite’ is a byproduct of the very high gamma ray/Neutron flux induced into the central steel core.  The radiation dissolves the steel into oxide consuming the carbon and silicone [sic] in the steel.”

Fact:  Iron oxide, or rust, is a component of thermite, not a product of a thermite reaction.  What was found in the dust was large amounts of molten iron droplets or spheres.  The molten iron that was found in the dust and at the base of the destroyed towers is evidence of a thermitic reaction, not a nuclear bomb.


One of the iron-rich spheres found in the dust.  These tiny balls of molten iron are a common element of the dust from the World Trade Center demolition.

Fact:  The active thermitic material that was found in the dust by Dr. Steven E. Jones, et al, was a nano-composite bi-layered material that had been manufactured using nano-technology.  This explosive nano-composite is most certainly not the by-product of a nuclear explosion.

The Duff piece claims that “the upward blast of radiation literally vaporized” the 20-ton antenna tower atop the South Tower:

This explains the missing steel columns and the very important clue of the “vaporized” 20-ton antenna tower atop the south tower [sic].  The upward blast of radiation literally vaporized it.  Video evidence proves this to be true. (Editor’s note: Tower issue a vital one.)

Fact:  This is completely false. Firstly, the antenna was atop the North Tower, and, secondly, it did not vaporize at all.  It was the first thing to be seen falling as the demolition of the tower began.  The base of the antenna is actually on display in the Newseum in Washington, D.C.


Part of the antenna mast that Gordon Duff says was “vaporized”.


The Newseum in Washington D.C. has an 18-foot section of the recovered main antenna from the North Tower on display.


The 360- foot main antenna mast on top of the North Tower in 1998.


Part of the antenna sticking out of the rubble pile of the North Tower.

The Duff piece concludes:  “The primary purpose of the nuclear weapon used on 9-11 was to produce a massive Gama [sic] ray/neutron flux that would vaporize about 150 to 300 feet of 6-inch thick steel I beams that constituted the central core of the WTC buildings.  This created the free fall event as seen on TV that day.”

Fact:  The Twin Towers were pulverized from the top down.  The core columns were severed, which is what caused the antenna mast to fall, but they were not vaporized in a nuclear blast.

The final paragraph of the Duff piece says: “The iron oxide found all over the place was what was left of the steel I beams.  This was the so-called Nano Thermite that was found everywhere.”

Fact:  This is pure nonsense.  Iron oxide was not found all over the place; iron-rich spheres were found in great numbers in the dust – tiny balls of iron that had been in the molten state when the towers were demolished.

This is not the “so-called Nano Thermite” that was found in the dust.  These iron-rich spheres are products of the thermitic reaction.  Duff is clearly misrepresenting the active thermitic material that was found in the dust.  This indicates that neither Duff nor Dean understand what was found in the dust – or they are working to misinform the reader.  I can only conclude that the latter is the case and that these men are agents of disinformation about what really happened on 9-11.


Sources and Recommended Reading:

“9/11: Honoring Broadcast Engineers of WTC #Sept11,” NYConvergence.com, September 10, 2011
http://nyconvergence.com/2011/09/911-honoring-broadcast-engineers-of-wtc-sept11.html

“Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe” by Dr. Steven E. Jones, et al, The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009
www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf

“Gordon Duff is a Jewish Disinformation Agent”, YouTube.com, November 11, 2012 (especially from 5:15 to 5:38)
youtu.be/YZufw3G931Q

“Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed – Russia Opens Files on Nuclear 9/11 and Israeli Proliferation” by Gordon Duff, VeteransToday.com, May 20, 2014
www.veteranstoday.com/2014/05/20/too-classified-to-publish-bush-nuclear-piracy-exposed/

“Understanding the Use of Thermite on 9-11” by Christopher Bollyn, July 14, 2009
www.bollyn.com/understanding-the-use-of-thermite-on-9-11/

Source: http://bollyn.com/#article_14718

ISIS is 50 Miles from Baghdad – Next Stop, Jerusalem

Have we traded the devil for the witch, or, possibly an EQUALIZER?  WW~

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Fighter of Jews, Defender of the Iraqi People, World’s Biggest Badass.

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Fighter of Jews, Defender of the Iraqi People, World’s Biggest Badass.

“It doesn’t matter who we are. What matters is our plan.” -Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, leader of ISIS

ISIS is now just fifty miles from Baghdad, ready to take down ZOG and establish an Islamofascist dictatorship in the capital of Iraq.

While liberating surrounding towns and cities from the ZOG forces, the masked revolutionaries have used megaphones to call on the people to join them as they march to “liberate Baghdad and Jerusalem.”

In the last days, ISIS has pulled off what can only be described as the most successful revolutionary military action in modern history.  With 700 men, they took over Mosul, a city of nearly two million people, ran off 30,000 fully equipped, US-trained ZOG troops, grabbed half a billion dollars from the banks and all of the US paid-for weapons from the military installations.

They are leaving a trail of executed ZOG commissars, mercilessly dealing out justice in the most brutal fashion.

It has been claimed that many of the men are Saddam loyalists, though I don’t think anyone really knows.  What we do know is that ISIS is approving the installation of massive posters of Saddam.  What this means is that the entire ten years that ZOG spent trying to conquer and subdue these people is going down the drain in a matter of days.

Reportedly, 1700 (and counting) ZOG agents have been dealt swift and merciless justice by the ISIS forces of retribution.

Reportedly, 1700 (and counting) ZOG agents have been dealt swift and merciless justice by the ISIS forces of retribution.

By next week, the entirety of Sunni Iraq will be ruled by the most brutally violent and tactically brilliant revolutionary organization on the planet, which is presently swearing to take back Jerusalem.

Don’t you dare tell me this is not awesome.

The entire “international community” is presently flipping the hell out, with Obama having changed his position on a ground invasion this morning, saying all options were on the table.

But could even a US ground invasion stop the momentum of these men?

There is No Downside to This

Some have criticized my celebration of the victories of ISIS, but at present, I am incapable of seeing any possible downside to this.

I will note that it is possible that I am wrong – I don’t want to give the impression that I am absolutely certain.  The whole situation is happening so fast, and it is all so new, that to draw final conclusions about the eventual outcome would be irresponsible.

But the immediate outcomes are all good, and it is difficult to imagine any negative outcomes in the future (except one, which I’ll get to).

The entire Western world has been made to look completely retarded by these men.  Everything they told us about democracy and victory over the forces of terrorism and all of the rest of it has just been finally proved to be the most idiotic load of gibberish ever spewed out of a television.  We now see for a fact – the whole world does – that all of the lives lost, all of the trillions spent, were entirely wasted by a bunch of twisted Jews occupying our government.

This is also incredibly bad for Israel, which is good for us.  Top analysts are admitting that if Baghdad falls, this will inspire uprisings all across the Islamic world, as the Arab people seek to return to their natural, biologically-evolved mode of living, which is brutal Islamic dictatorship.  A pan-Arab Islamic state is something that the Jews have sought to ensure did not happen ever since the fall of the Ottoman Empire.  If such a state exists, Israel cannot.

“The fire rises, brothers.” -Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi

I am not saying this is going to happen.  Who knows, the Iraqi ZOG troops might repel them from Baghdad later today.

But what they have done thus far is incredible.  Unprecedented.  And if any group of Muslims is capable of unifying the Arab world and taking down the Jew state, it is ISIS and their masked leader, Sheik Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

Please note that even a major Islamic empire could never threaten Europe ever again, given the development of technology over the last century.  This is not the Middle Ages, and even if an Islamic empire was capable of acquiring modern weaponry, they don’t have the necessary IQ, on average, to be capable of managing an invasion of Europe.

The sad part is that this is not good for Assad, Hezbollah or Iran, who I tend to like.  But Sunni and Shia have always fought each other, and that is unavoidable.  I have no dog in that fight, my fight is with the Jews, so I am going to back whichever power has the greatest chance of throwing a wrench in the mechanism of the Zionist apparatus, and presently, ISIS is doing a lot more to fight the Jews than any of these people have done (at least since Hezbollah repelled the invasion of Lebanon).

The only major negative of this is that it is going to fuel calls for more “asylum seekers” in Europe.  But that is unavoidable.  Whatever was going to happen in the Middle East was going to fuel calls for further invasion of Europe by the poor and dirty rejects of the Islamic world, and they are coming so heavily already, it is hard to imagine they could get them in any faster.

Though that might not even be the case.  Apparently, ISIS has increased electricity output in Mosul after having taken the city from the ZOG forces, and seems very intent on making sure the people are taken care of.  The tribal leaders love them.

It may be that more people want to live in the Middle East after the revolution is complete.  As we know, this type of brutal regime is what they are drawn to, by their blood.  They cannot ever truly feel whole in Europe, just as we could never feel whole living under a brutal Sharia regime in the desert run by masked men with machine guns.

It is good to be realistic, but it is highly damaging to be pessimistic.  Good things happen, and right now, it very much looks like the rise of ISIS is a very good thing.

It’s Friday.  Why not raise a glass to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the brutally violent and tactically brilliant revolutionary who may just have a chance of wiping Israel off the map?

Source: http://www.dailystormer.com/isis-is-50-miles-from-baghdad-next-stop-jerusalem/

John Friend’s honest essay: WHY I DON’T CARE FOR THE JEWS

Periodically, I do get comments and questions that always ask the same questions:  Why do you “hate” the Jews so much?  What have they ever done to you?…..The answer is that I have no hatred for anyone that is not evil, and from what we see with the machinations of this “tribe”, they truly are very evil!  I also need not even look at what they have done to me, personally, but at what they are doing to EVERYONE….I always ask people if they have actually sat down and read their Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, which is their blueprint for world domination….People must always remember that we are dealing with a psychotic “cult” that thinks of themselves as superior to everyone else and has long term goal of the subjugation and/or mass slaughter of all those who are non-Jews…. With those being the goals of this “tribe”, what is there not to hate????

I want to share with my own readers the following very important article that was just released by John Friend, who writes “John Friend’s Blog” at http://www.john-friend.net…. It is entitled: “Why I Don’t Care For The Jews”, and is a definite must read by everyone… I do have that article right here, and of course my own thoughts and comments to follow:

Why I don’t care for the Jews

Despite the fact that I maintain this website, host a radio program and write for a national newspaper, I really am a regular guy. I like to spend time with my family and friends, go hiking, hang out at the beach, lift weights, go jogging and biking, watch football, have a beer and everything else regular Americans like to do (for the most part).

I suppose I’ve always been somewhat of a free-thinker, and critical of the government and media to a certain extent. Things changed drastically once I began investigating the events of 9/11 – I quickly discovered that everything the government and media have told us about that monumental, world-changing event was and remains a total lie.

After a few months of investigating, I realized that the state of Israel and a wider international network of Jewish criminals controlling the mass media and United States government were responsible for planning, organizing, orchestrating and benefiting from 9/11. That’s when I truly discovered the reality of the age-old phenomenon often called the Jewish problem.

It’s not easy talking about the Jews, especially if you have negative and critical things to say about them and their agenda. I’ve decided to write this article in case I have to explain my views about the Jews to an average person I meet in public, which has actually happened quite often recently.

To be perfectly frank, I don’t particularly care for the Jews, and here’s why.

(I should note here that when I say “the Jews,” I am specifically referring to the organized Jewish community, not necessarily every single Jewish individual. Some of the biggest critics of Israel, Zionism, Jewish identity politics and even the Jewish religion are Jews themselves, such as Benjamin Freedman, Myron Fagan, Israel ShahakBrother Nathanael Kapner and Gilad Atzmon

I don’t particularly care for the Jews because they are liars.

Through their control of the mass media and influence in academia and our educational establishment, the Jews have managed to deceive the entire world with their false, often entirely fabricated version of history and current events. Writing in Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler described the Jews as having an “unqualified capacity for falsehood,” and he was exactly right.

Just to underscore this crucial point, in the Gospel of John, 8:44, Jesus Christ addressed the people we know as Jews today, stating: “Ye are of [your] father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”

The Jews would have you believe that they are benevolent bearers of “enlightenment,” “progress” and “tolerance,” while being innocent, blameless “victims” of irrational “anti-Semites” all throughout history, when in reality every time genuine anti-Jewish sentiment has reared its head in a public manner it has always been because of subversive, criminal Jewish behavior.

The Jews have been thrown out of over 100 countries over the course of history, not because people everywhere are mindless “anti-Semites” who irrationally persecute Jews, but because of Jewish behavior and actions.

The Jews basically lie about everything. They lie about Adolf Hitler and WWII, portraying him and National Socialist Germany as the epitome of evil, a “racist anti-Semitic” movement who wanted to “conquer the world for the Aryan race” and systematically murder the entire Jewish population in Europe. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany were the greatest threat to international Jewry’s global agenda of world domination, subjugation and exploitation – and the Jews know it.

Hitler simply wanted the Jews out of Europe, recognizing their corrupt, degenerate, parasitic existence in the heart of Western civilization. Once Hitler legally and democratically came to power, he attempted to rectify – through diplomatic means – the unjust provisions of the various “peace treaties” which officially ended WWI, particularly the Treaty of Versailles pertaining specifically to Germany. Hitler and the German people were subjected to ridicule, disrespect and contempt by the international community, especially the French, British and American political and media establishment. Hitler was focused primarily on ending unemployment in Germany, uplifting and revitalizing the Germany people and strengthening the German nation. The last thing he wanted was to fight another World War.

The entire official Jewish narrative of WWII is the exact opposite of what really happened during this critical period of time in our history. Hitler did not initiate WWII, the Jewish controlled Western democracies did; Hitler’s Germany and her allies did not “Holocaust” the Jews of Europe, the Allied nations committed genocide against the German people and their allies. Virtually all of the crimes the Jews and their puppets – the Americans, British and Soviets primarily – committed were projected onto the Germans through the Jewish control of the mass media, Hollywood and political establishment. The story of “6 million Jews” being “exterminated by the evil Nazis” is a totally fraudulent narrative that has been manufactured and perpetuated over the years by Jewish propagandists and their lackeys. Psychologically and emotionally exploitative propaganda has been effectively used to reinforce and reinstill the fake Jewish “Holocaust” narrative over the years, particularly in the West.

The Jews lie about 9/11 being organized and carried out by Osama bin Laden and “al-Qaeda”, when in reality the Jews planned, executed and have benefited from 9/11, and merely blamed it on bin Laden and “radical Muslim terrorists” in order to kick start the fraudulent, pre-planned “Global War on Terror” and to justify the tyrannical “Homeland Security” paradigm in America and the West.

The Jews lied about Iraq having “Weapons of Mass Destruction” and are lying about Iran attempting to acquire them. The entire “Global War on Terror” and threat of “international terrorism” is one big lie.

The Jews lie about vaccines being good and necessary for children, and a wide variety of other medical and health issues. I could go on and on here folks. Suffice it to say: the Jews lie about almost everything.

I don’t particularly care for the Jews because they are hypocrites.

The Jews are easily the biggest hypocrites in the entire world. They openly organize, raise money and advocate for their own unique political, cultural and economic interests, often at the expense of everyone else. And yet they condemn anyone and everyone – especially White Christian peoples – for attempting to do the same exact thing.

The Jewish state of “Israel” – an illegitimate, fraudulent terrorist state occupying Palestine – is the home of the Jewish people. Non-Jews in Israel are discriminated against, persecuted and even deported on a regular basis. And yet the Jews are the biggest proponents of “diversity” and “multiculturalism” and massive non-White immigration into traditionally White Western European countries, including the United States, Canada, Australia and, of course, Europe. According to the Jews, there can be no White nations – that’s “racist” after all. White people that seek to protect their homelands, culture, racial identity and traditions are considered “backwards” and “racist” while the Jews openly organize and champion their own unique Jewish interests and have their own Jewish state. This is unacceptable.

Anyone even slightly criticizing the globalist, anti-White “multicultural” agenda which is seeking to displace and eliminate White people, White countries, White identity and White culture is somehow an “evil Nazi bigot” who “hates other people” and “wants to kill Six Million Jews.” We are forced to be “tolerant” and “respectful” of everything and everyone – homosexuals, transgendered individuals, sexual deviants and perverts, criminal illegal aliens, subversives and everything in between – except for White people who care about and want to preserve their homelands, heritage, culture and race.

The hypocrisy from the Jews is simply astounding and intolerable.

I don’t particularly care for the Jews because they are usurers, thieves and con artists.

All throughout history, the Jews have been known as usurers and shady, corrupt businessmen. Usury is simply the loaning of money at interest to other individuals, businesses and governments, enslaving them through debt. The Jews have managed to essentially monopolize the practice of usury, and have institutionalized this practice on both a national and international scale.

The Federal Reserve System, which is nothing more than a consortium of private (largely Jewish owned and controlled) banks who have a monopoly on printing and loaning money to the United States government, was a creation of international bankers connected to the Rothschild banking dynasty in Britain and Europe. The central banks of Europe, Britain and elsewhere are all connected to this international system of usury, centered around not only the Federal Reserve, Bank of England and European Central Bank, but also the International Monetary Fund, World Bank and Bank for International Settlements.

The practice of usury is nothing more than the institutionalized defrauding and enslavement of entire nations. The international financial system dominating the global economy at this point is based on usury, exploitation, speculation and fraud. Everyone reading here no doubt experienced the 2008 financial collapse and aftermath. Wall Street banks and other international financial institutions essentially defrauded and robbed the entire world, and were rewarded, rather than arrested, with a massive bailout by the United States federal government for their criminal behavior.

Wall Street and other major international banking and financial institutions are dominated by Jews. Rather than actually working, producing a legitimate product that advances society, they exploit, cheat, defraud and steal from others. I have a problem with this.

I don’t particularly care for the Jews because they are treacherous and exploitative.

The Jewish holy book known as the Talmud specifically sanctions and encourages deceiving, lying to, exploiting, defrauding and even killing non-Jews. “Even the best of the Goyim (non-Jews) should be killed,” the filthy Talmud teaches Jews. That’s how bad it is folks. Go read about it.

Most people erroneously believe the Jews’ holy book is the Torah, or the Old Testament, when in reality the real holy book of the Jewish rabbis and the Jewish people is the Talmud, which is a commentary on and, truth be hold, systematic critique and subversion of the Old Testament and Mosaic law. The Jews are not the Israelites of the Bible, despite the modern day Jewish state occupying Palestine being called Israel.

The Jewish religion and culture encourages defrauding and stealing from non-Jews. The Jews are notorious for their ponzi schemes, espionage operations and commercial and industrial theft. Jewish spies have regularly been detected and arrested throughout history, even in the United States. Jonathan Pollard is a prime example.

Jewish spies and agents have repeatedly stolen American military and industrial technology, blackmailed major politicians and other leading figures in society (Remember the Monica Lewinsky affair? Yeah, she was Jewish and that entire operation was run by Jews), systematically advanced false and misleading information in the mass media in order to achieve certain geopolitical goals (Remember “Saddam Hussein’s Weapons of Mass Destruction”? All Jewish lies) and have otherwise engaged in treacherous, exploitative behavior. The Jews will stop at nothing to achieve their goals, no matter how ruthless they have to be.

The Jews are and have always been extremely treacherous and exploitative. Those of you who have had dealings with Jews know this fact perfectly well.

I don’t particularly care for the Jews because they are subverters, radicals and perverts.

“We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers for ever,” wrote Jewish author Maurice Samuels in his book You Gentiles. “Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will for ever destroy…”

Marcus Eli Ravage, yet another Jewish author, wrote in the January 1928 issue of Century Magazine: “You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are disturbers. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them.”

The Jews have always been the leading radicals, subversives and revolutionaries throughout history. Communism, feminism, “gender equality”, homosexual rights, transgender rights, sexual deviancy, pornography and sexual promiscuity – Jews have led and championed all of these movements and efforts all throughout history, even to this very day.

The Jews absolutely hate traditional Western civilization, and have worked overtime to critique, subvert, debase and ultimately destroy our civilization and traditions. The Jews have poisoned our minds with subversive, degenerate ideas, and have normalized debauched, grotesque behaviors and lifestyles, including homosexuality, sexual licentiousness, miscegenation and other perverted, destructive practices.

Turn on the television today and you will see how far we have fallen.

I don’t particularly like the Jews because they dominate and control the American government, media, banking system, and other major aspects of our society.

The organized Jewish community, through its various lobbies, non-profit organizations, museums, charities and other institutions, essentially controls the Western political establishment. The United States Congress, White House and Supreme Court are dominated by Jews and non-Jewish puppets of the Jews. It’s truly shameful how subservient the American government, political establishment and “elite society” is to Israel and the Jewish community. On a daily basis, American politicians literally commit treason against their own country – right in the face of the American public.

Jews themselves openly admit and boast about their ownership and control of the mass media and Hollywood. Joel Stein, a Jewish journalist, wrote an article in the Los Angeles Times back in December of 2008 entitled, “Who runs Hollwood? C’mon,” where he jokes about the alleged “anti-Semitic” canard that “Jews control Hollywood” and openly states: “Jews totally run Hollywood.” To conclude his essay, he writes that he doesn’t “care if Americans think we’re [Jews] running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government,” he only cares “that we [Jews] get to keep running them.”

The Times of Israel, a popular online Israeli news outlet, published a blog post back in 2012 provocatively entitled, “Jews DO control the media”.

So much for the “anti-Semitic” canard or “conspiracy theory” about Jews owning and controlling the mass media and Hollywood – they openly admit and boast about it in their own newspapers!

As previously mentioned, the Jewish control of Wall Street, the Federal Reserve and other major international financial and banking institutions is a well known fact at this point.

There are two really good websites pointing these facts out that I would highly recommend checking out. A website called JewishFaces.com thoroughly documents the Jewish dominance of the American government, politics, banking, media and other aspects of society. Also, be sure to visit Who Controls America? at thezog.wordpress.com for more documentation of the Jewish dominance of America.

The total Jewish control of America is truly mind boggling.

The Jews have subverted America, and are well on their way to entirely wrecking the place. And most people sit around in total ignorance as to what is really going on. Or, even worse, they’re too afraid to say or do anything about it.

That’s why I don’t particularly care for the Jews.
___________________

 

NTS Notes: Of course John discusses in this article the infamous “Holocaust” of World War II that I cannot discuss or comment on, simply because I do live in Canada, and to “deny” that event can lead to jail time…I have always said that if that part of our so called “history” is true,then why all the laws that block its proper investigation and research?  It does make one wonder again and again about what they have to hide?

John talks about the dominance of the American government by this “tribe” in his article, but the fact is that the “tribe” dominates ALL governments across the entire planet, including my own right here in Canada… The so called “elected” government representatives in Ottawa here in Canada cannot make any move without first getting the approval of the Jewish power elite that fully controls this once proud nation….

And about those who scream “Anti-Semitism” when I and others bring forward the facts about exactly what the Jews are all about….The first question I have for them is of course: “Must you be actually Semitic yourselves before you can scream “Antisemitism” at others?”  We are dealing with Asiatic Indo-Turkish Khazars here are we not?  The majority of them have not one drop of Semitic blood in their entire lot, so how is it that they can therefore even scream “Antisemitism” at others?   And of course I have in my blog videos on the left hand column the famous interview with an Israeli who shows definitive proof that the screaming of “Antisemitism” is nothing more than a trick to use against anyone who sees the truth about the evils of the tribe!

I always say to people to just Google “Famous Quotes From The Talmud” to see exactly how evil these people truly are.. That alone is a real eye opener!

As I have always said… I have no qualms against many of this “tribe”… But they themselves do absolutely nothing to stop the evil actions of many of their own cult, and instead sit on the sidelines quietly supporting their actions as silent cheerleaders… As far as I am concerned, that makes them accessories to the crimes.

More to come

NTS

The People Against the 800 Pound Gorilla

WW~Notes:  It’s nice to see, at least, partial truth coming from Counterpunch.  There are many obvious lies and untruths in the attached article regarding Jews, yet, it is still noteworthy and worth the read.  Seems as though even the ultra-Conservatives are not entirely behind Israel’s war drums against Syria, which will inevitably lead to Iran. 

aipac1

by JEAN BRICMONT and DIANA JOHNSTONE

The past ten days have seen what could be the start of an historic turning point away from endless war in the Middle East.  Public opinion in the United States, in harmony with the majority of people in the world, has clearly rejected U.S. military intervention in Syria.

But for this turn away from war to be complete and lasting, greater awareness is needed of the forces that have been pushing the United States into these wars, and will surely continue to do so until they are clearly and openly rejected.

An American friend who knows Washington well recently told us that “everybody” there knows that, as far as the drive to war with Syria is concerned, it is Israel that directs U.S. policy. Why then, we replied, don’t opponents of war say it out loud, since, if the American public knew that, support for the war would collapse?  Of course, we knew the answer to that question. They are afraid to say all they know, because if you blame the pro-Israel lobby, you are branded an anti-Semite in the media and your career is destroyed.

One who had that experience is James Abourezk, former Senator from South Dakota, who has testified:  “I can tell you from personal experience that, at least in the Congress, the support Israel has in that body is based completely on political fear – fear of defeat by anyone who does not do what Israel wants done. I can also tell you that very few members of Congress–at least when I served there – have any affection for Israel or for its lobby. What they have is contempt, but it is silenced by fear of being found out exactly how they feel. I’ve heard too many cloakroom conversations in which members of the Senate will voice their bitter feelings about how they’re pushed around by the lobby to think otherwise. In private one hears the dislike of Israel and the tactics of the lobby, but not one of them is willing to risk the lobby’s animosity by making their feelings public.”
Abourezk added : “The only exceptions to that rule are the feelings of Jewish members, who, I believe, are sincere in their efforts to keep U.S. money flowing to Israel. But that minority does not a U.S. imperial policy make.”[1]

Since we do not have to run for Congress, we feel free to take a close look at that highly delicate question. First, we’ll review the evidence for the crucial role of the pro-Israel lobby, then we’ll discuss some objections.

For evidence, it should be enough to quote some recent headlines from the American and Israeli press.

First, according to the Times of Israel (not exactly an anti-Zionist rag): “Israel intelligence seen as central to U.S. case against Syria.”[2] (Perhaps the fact that it is “central” also explains why it is so dubious[3].)

Then, in Haaretz[4]: “AIPAC to deploy hundreds of lobbyists to push for Syria action”. Or, in U.S. News and World Report[5]: “Pro-Israel lobby Seeks to Turn Tide on Syria Debate in Congress”. According to Bloomberg[6]: “Adelson New Obama Ally as Jewish Groups Back Syria Strike”. The worst enemies of Obama become his allies, provided he does what “Jewish groups” want. Even rabbis enter the dance: according to the Times of Israel[7], “U.S. rabbis urge Congress to back Obama on Syria”.

The New York Times explained some of the logic behind the pressure: “Administration officials said the influential pro-Israel lobby group AIPAC was already at work pressing for military action against the government of Mr. Assad, fearing that if Syria escapes American retribution for its use of chemical weapons, Iran might be emboldened in the future to attack Israel. … One administration official, who, like others, declined to be identified discussing White House strategy, called AIPAC ‘the 800-pound gorilla in the room,’ and said its allies in Congress had to be saying, ‘If the White House is not capable of enforcing this red line’ against the catastrophic use of chemical weapons, ‘we’re in trouble’.”

Even more interesting, this part of the story was deleted by the New York Times, according to M.J. Rosenberg[8], which is consistent with the fact that the lobby prefers to act discreetly.

Now, to the objections:

There are indeed forces other than the Israel lobby pushing for war.  It is true that some neighboring countries like Saudi Arabia or Turkey also want to destroy Syria, for their own reasons. But they have nowhere near the political influence on the United States of the Israel lobby.  If Saudi princes use their money to try to corrupt a few U.S. politicians, that can easily be denounced as interference by a foreign power in the internal affairs of the United States. But no similar charge can be raised against Israeli influence because of the golden gag rule: any mention of such influence can be immediately denounced as a typical anti-Semitic slur against a nonexistent “Jewish power”.  Referring to the perfectly obvious, public activities of the Israel lobby may even be likened to peddling a “conspiracy theory”.

But many of our friends insist that every war is driven by economic interests. Isn’t this latest war to be waged because big bad capitalists want to exploit Syrian gas, or use Syrian territory for a gas pipeline, or open up the Syrian economy to foreign investments?

There is a widespread tendency, shared by much of the left, especially among people who think of themselves as Marxists (Marx himself was far more nuanced on this issue), to think that wars must be due to cynically rational calculations by capitalists.  If this were so, these wars “for oil” might be seen as “in the national interest”.  But this view sees “capitalism” as a unified actor issuing orders to obedient politicians on the basis of careful calculations.   As Bertrand Russell put it, this putative rationality ignores “the ocean of human folly upon which the fragile barque of human reason insecurely floats”.  Wars have been waged for all kinds of non-economic reasons, such as religion or revenge, or simply to display power.

People who think that capitalists want wars to make profits should spend time observing the board of directors of any big corporation: capitalists need stability, not chaos, and the recent wars only bring more chaos. American capitalists are making fortunes in China and Vietnam now that there is peace between the U.S. and those countries, which was not possible during hostilities. As for the argument that they need wars to loot resources, one may observe that the U.S. is buying oil from Iraq now, and so does China, but China did not have to ruin itself in a costly war.  Like Iraq, Iran or Syria are perfectly willing to sell their resources, and it is the political embargoes imposed by the U.S. that prevent such trade. As for the “war for oil” thesis in the case of Libya, the Guardian recently reported that “Libya is facing its most critical moment since the ousting of Muammar Gaddafi with armed groups blockading oil fields and terminals, choking output to a 10th of normal levels and threatening economic disaster.”[9]As for Iraq, Stephen Sniegoski has shown, in The Transparent Cabal, The Neoconsevative Agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel, that the war was only due to the neoconservatives and that the oil companies had no desire whatsoever to go to war.  Indeed, there is no evidence of an “oil lobby” sending its agents to urge Members of Congress to vote for war, as AIPAC is doing.

And how does one explain that many of the most determined opponents of war are found on the right of the political spectrum?  Do the Tea Party, Ron Paul, Pat Buchanan, Justin Raimundo and antiwar.com, Paul Craig Roberts, among others, fail to see the wonderful profits to be made by capitalists in a devastated Syria?

The fact is that in the post-colonial period, wherever profits can be made through war, they can be made much more reliably in peaceful conditions, and most capitalists seem to have understood that. There is no need to conquer countries in order to purchase their resources, invest in their economies or sell them our products.  Most countries are in fact eager for legitimate trade.

On the other hand, it can be argued that the huge military-industrial complex (MIC) benefits from wars.  Doesn’t the MIC need wars to maintain the lifeblood of military appropriations? Here the matter is complex. The MIC benefits above all from various hyped-up threats of war, most notably the Soviet threat during the Cold War, which kept the credits and contracts flowing through the Pentagon.  But long, botched wars such as in Afghanistan or Iraq tend to give war a bad name, are economically ruinous and lead to questioning the need for the huge U.S. military. The MIC doesn’t need another one in Syria. Many military officers are openly hostile to mounting at attack against Syria.

The interests that profit directly from recent U.S. wars – and not from mere “threats” – are very few. They are above all the giant construction firms, Bechtel, Halliburton and their subsidiaries, which, through their connections with officials such as Dick Cheney, win contracts to build U.S. military bases abroad and sometimes to rebuild infrastructure destroyed by the U.S. Air Force. This amounts to a recycling of American taxpayers’ money, which in no way “profits” the United States, or American capitalism in general; besides, those construction firms are not big compared to major U.S. corporations.  These profiteers could never pose as a “justification” for wars, but are the mere vultures feeding off conflicts.

The basic responsibility for war of the U.S. military-industrial complex is simply that it is there.  And as Madeleine Albright famously said, “what is the use of having that splendid military if we don’t use it?”  In fact, ever since the collapse of the Soviet Union (and indeed arguably ever since the end of World War II), there is no obviously good reason to use it, and it might well be dismantled and resources redirected toward modernizing U.S. infrastructure and other useful and profitable activities.  However, an intellectual industry called “think tanks” has developed in Washington devoted to justifying the perpetuation of the MIC.  It specializes in identifying potential “threats”.  Over the years, these think tanks have increasingly come under the influence of billionaire benefactors of Israel such as Haim Saban (founder of the Saban Center at the Brookings Institution).  Since there are in reality virtually no serious threats to the United States calling for such colossal military strength, alleged “threats to U.S. interests” in the Middle East are invented by adopting supposed threats to Israel as threats to the United States.  Example number one: Iran.

People on the left are not wrong in supposing that Washington would want to defend “American geo-strategic interests”. Those certainly exist, and are a proper object of controversy. But the crucial question here is whether support for Israeli policy aims in the Middle East is among them.  Indeed, there is a sector of the U.S. foreign policy establishment that promotes an aggressive global foreign policy that amounts to a sort of world conquest, with U.S. military bases and military exercises surrounding Russia and China, as if in preparation for some final showdown.  But the fact is that the most active advocates of this aggressive policy are the pro-Israel neoconservatives of the Project for the New American Century that pushed the Bush II presidency into war against Iraq, and now, as the Foreign Policy Initiative, are pushing Obama toward war against Syria.  Their general line is that U.S. and Israeli interests are identical, and that U.S. world domination is good, or even necessary, for Israel. Such close identification with Israel has caused the United States to be intensely hated throughout the Muslim world, which is not good for the United States in the long run.

Perhaps because genuine, material or economic U.S. interests in going to war are so hard to find, the emphasis has shifted in the past decade to alleged “moral” concerns, such as “the responsibility to protect”, packaged with a catchy brand name, “R2P”.  Today, the strongest advocates of going to war are the various humanitarian imperialists or liberal interventionist, who argue on the basis of R2P, or “justice for victims”, or alleged “genocide prevention”.

There is a large overlap between humanitarian interventionism and support for Israel. In France Bernard Kouchner, who first invented and promoted the concept of the “right to intervene”, stated in a recent interview that “Israel is like no other country.  It is the result of the terrifying massacre of the Holocaust.” It is therefore “our duty” to protect it.  Bernard-Henry Lévy prodded the French government to start the war against Libya, making no secret that he considered he was acting as a Jew for the interests of Israel; he is now the foremost and fiercest advocate of bombing Syria.  In both France and the United States, advocates of “humanitarian” intervention justify bombing Syria by referring to the Holocaust in the past and to a hypothetical, and totally unsubstantiated, intention by Iran to risk national suicide by attacking Israel in the future.

In the United States, these concerns of the Israel lobby are given ideological and institutional expression by such influential advisors as Samantha Power, Madeleine Albright and the two Abramowitz’s (Morton the father and Michael the son, in charge of “genocide prevention efforts” at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum).  The argument is used repeatedly that because “we” did not intervene quickly enough against Auschwitz, we have an obligation to intervene militarily to prevent other possible slaughters.

On September 6, the Cleveland Jewish News published a letter from “leading rabbis” urging Congress to support President Obama’s plans to strike Syria. “We write you as descendants of Holocaust survivors and refugees, whose ancestors were gassed to death in concentration camps,” the letter said.  By authorizing bombing raids, the rabbis said, “Congress has the capacity to save thousands of lives”…

Without such dramatization, obscuring the reality of each new crisis with images of the Holocaust, the whole notion that the best way to promote human rights and protect populations is to wage unilateral wars, destroy what is left of the international legal order and spread chaos would be seen for the absurdity it is.  Only the fervor of the champions of Israel enables such emotional arguments to swamp reasonable discussion.

But one may reasonably ask what are the interests of Israel itself in inciting the United States to fight in Syria?  Israelis seem to have frightened themselves into believing that the very existence of another power in the region, namely Iran, amounts to an existential threat.  But the mere fact that a policy is pursued does not mean that it is necessarily in the interests of those who pursue it. That is again ignoring the “ocean of human folly”. Napoleon and Hitler had no interest or desire in bringing Russian troops to Paris or Berlin, but their policies led to precisely that. The emperors of Germany, Austria and Russia had no interest in launching the First World War, since, in the end, they all lost their thrones as a result of the war. But launch it they did. The future is unpredictable, and that is why it is difficult to deduce intentions from consequences.  Israel’s hostile policy toward its neighbors can reasonably be seen as self-defeating in the long run.

Oddly enough, some observers deny the obvious, arguing that Bashar al Assad has allowed Israel to occupy Syrian territory on the Golan Heights and has kept the border quiet (without explaining what else he could have done, given the relationship of forces) and concluding that Israel has no interest in toppling him.  But what matters is that Assad is allied with Hezbollah and with Iran. Israel hates Hezbollah for its successful resistance to Israeli occupation of Lebanon, and sees Iran as the only potential challenge to Israeli military supremacy in the region.

Even so, it is not certain that Israel’s war aim would be to overthrow Assad. A clue to Israel’s strategy is provided by a September 5 article in the New York Times[10]: “Israeli officials have consistently made the case that enforcing Mr. Obama’s narrow ‘red line’ on Syria is essential to halting the nuclear ambitions of Israel’s archenemy, Iran. More quietly, Israelis have increasingly argued that the best outcome for Syria’s two-and-a-half-year-old civil war, at least for the moment, is no outcome. For Jerusalem, the status quo, horrific as it may be from a humanitarian perspective, seems preferable to either a victory by Mr. Assad’s government and his Iranian backers or a strengthening of rebel groups, increasingly dominated by Sunni jihadis.”

“This is a playoff situation in which you need both teams to lose, but at least you don’t want one to win — we’ll settle for a tie,” said Alon Pinkas, a former Israeli consul general in New York. “Let them both bleed, hemorrhage to death: that’s the strategic thinking here. As long as this lingers, there’s no real threat from Syria.”

So, the real goal of the limited strikes (and the reason why they ought to be limited) would be to send a message to Iran, about its nonexistent nuclear arms program and, in Syria, let both sides “bleed to death”. How nice! Waging a war based on the flimsiest of evidence only to prolong a bloody conflict may not be a very moral endeavor for all those who claim to act out of passion for “our values” and for deep concern over the “suffering of the Syrian people”.

In its zeal to serve what it considers Israel’s interests, AIPAC and its affiliates practice deception concerning the issues at stake. The lobby misrepresents the interests of the United States, and even ignores the long term interests of the Jewish people whom it often claims to represent. It is pure folly for a minority, however powerful and respected, to try to impose an unpopular war on the majority. Since Israel often claims to represent the Jewish people as a whole, if the majority of Americans are forced to pay an unacceptable price for “defending Israel”, sooner or later voices will be raised blaming “the Jews”.  Indeed, this can be seen by a brief look at what already gets written, anonymously of course, on social media, ranging from various conspiracy theories to outright Jew-bashing.

We, who are totally opposed to the notion of collective guilt, wish to avoid such an outcome. Far from being anti-Semitic, we deplore all forms of “identity politics” that ignore the diversity within every human group.  We simply want to be able to say “no” openly to the pro-Israel lobby without being subjected to moral intimidation.  This has nothing to do with Jewish religion or identity or culture: it is entirely political.  We claim our right to refuse to be drawn into somebody else’s war.  We believe that these endless wars are not “good for the Jews” – or for anyone else.  We want to contribute to efforts at mutual understanding, diplomacy, compromise and disarmament. In short, to strengthen “the fragile barque of human reason” adrift on the ocean of human folly.  Otherwise, that folly may drown us all.

For now, the threat of war has been avoided, or at least “postponed”. Let us not forget that Iraq and Libya also gave up their weapons of mass destruction, only to be attacked later. Syria is likely to abandon its chemical weapons, but without any guarantee that the rebels, much less Israel, won’t retain such weapons. The popular mobilization against the war, probably the first one in history to stop a war before it starts, has been intense but may be short-lived.  Those whose war plans have been interrupted can be expected to come up with new maneuvers to regain the initiative.  These past days have given a glimpse of what can be accomplished when people wake up and say no to war.  This must be an inspiration for continued efforts to make diplomacy prevail over bullying, and mutual disarmament over endless war. If people really want peace, it can be possible.

JEAN BRICMONT teaches physics at the University of Louvain in Belgium. He is author of Humanitarian Imperialism.  He can be reached at Jean.Bricmont@uclouvain.be

DIANA JOHNSTONE is author of Fools Crusade: Yugoslavia, NATO and Western Delusions.  She lives in Paris and can be reached at diana.josto@yahoo.fr

Notes.

[1]  http://www.uruknet.de/?p=m28769

[3] For a discussion of the “evidence,” see, for example, Gareth Porter: How Intelligence Was to Support an Attack on Syria, http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/18559-how-intelligence-was-twisted-to-support-an-attack-on-syria.

[4]  http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.545661

The Real Aryans

I captured this video from John Friend’s Blog, which was sent to him by a friend. 

The images of children and adults contained in the video are extraordinarily beautiful and the music is haunting and dramatic.  If these people are indigenous to the middle east and not immigrants, then we’ve been led to believe another lie about the white race.

Whitewraithe~