Rescuing Israel: The Holocaust

WW~Notes:  This is the most comprehensive body of information I’ve ever seen written on the holocaust. I am including all the documentation from this website as it will probably disappear, instead of just providing the links.  My suggestion is to print everything on this page to preserve the truth for future generations.

Rescuing Israel: The Holocaust, takes a cold, hard look at several facets of Germany’s role in World War II and the Jewish holocaust, challenging the mainstream version of this infamous historical event. Most importantly, the open-minded reader will begin to understand why the historical record was falsified and how the holocaust has been, and continues to be used to alter the course of history and politics throughout the world today to the determent of all humankind, including the Jewish people.

Take the holocaust quiz!

Before reading Rescuing Israel: The Holocaust, test your current knowledge of this historic event by taking a brief quiz.

1.  The Quiz – Test Your Holocaust Knowledge

zyklon-b-canTest Your Knowledge of the Holocaust

One of the most misunderstood historical events, the Jewish holocaust of World War II is a fascinating and complex subject, as well as a political hot potato.

How much do you really know about the holocaust?

2.  The Survivor – The story of holocaust survivor, Irene Zisblatt

“For every time that I was hungry, beaten or was tortured with experiments, I was hitting back by keeping my mother’s diamonds.” — Irene Zisblatt, the Miami Herald, Dec., 2008

On 19 Dec., 2008, an article titled ‘Holocaust survivor escaped with gems’ appeared in the web edition of the Miami Herald. It has since been removed, but the article provided an overview of the story of Irene Weisberg Zisblatt, a World War II holocaust survivor and Orthodox Jew, born Chana Seigelstein in Hungary around 1931.

Zisblatt, who remained silent for 50 years, decided to go public with her account of suffering, torture, medical experimentation and eventual escape from the notorious Auschwitz concentration camp in Poland after having been inspired by the film Schindler’s List. Her romantic story centers around 4 diamonds given to her by her mother “to be used to buy bread should she ever find herself hungry” and is available in her book, The Fifth Diamond. A copy of the Miami Herald article is provided here for reference (a photograph of Irene Zisblatt was added):

Irene ZisblattHolocaust survivor escaped with gems
Special to The Miami Herald

Her mother gave her four diamonds to be used to buy bread should she ever find herself hungry during World War II, but those diamonds gave Irene Weisberg Zisblatt the fortitude to survive the Holocaust.

“I can not buy bread with your diamonds, mother, but as long as I am alive they will stay with me,” she wrote in her memoir, The Fifth Diamond: The Story of Irene Weisberg Zisblatt.

A resident of Pembroke Pines since 1990, Zisblatt recently discussed her book and appearance in Steven Spielberg’s documentary, The Last Days, at Nova Southeastern University.

Born Chana Seigelstein, Zisblatt lived in Hungary with her parents and five siblings. In 1942, when she was 11, her mother, Rachel, sewed the diamonds into the hem of her skirt before she was taken by the Nazis to the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp in Poland.

Zisblatt’s entire family was killed in the gas chambers, and those four diamonds were the last mementoes of them. The only way Irene could keep the diamonds hidden was to swallow and retrieve them over and over again. She did this for 15 months.

Zisblatt told the audience how, as a young prisoner in the camps, she was a favorite of Dr. Josef Mengele, who performed experiments and surgeries on her and other prisoners without anesthesia. A girl named Sabka was another of Mengele’s regular victims. Though they weren’t allowed to speak, they formed a friendship and Zisblatt drew strength from their bond.

“The diamonds survived because, to me, they were the strength, the hope, the courage, and my mother, so they had to survive,” Zisblatt said. In having a valuable secret from the Nazis, she felt that she was defeating her torturers. “For every time that I was hungry, beaten or was tortured with experiments, I was hitting back by keeping my mother’s diamonds.”

Mengele injected chemicals into her eyes in an attempt to change their color and forced her to remain in a cold room for days. He injected viruses under Zisblatt’s fingernail and surgically experimented on her to find a way to remove the numbers tattooed on her arm. Afterward, he ordered the nurse to administer a lethal injection to both girls, but the nurse worked for the underground and was able to free them, one of many miracles Zisblatt experienced.

“Mengele was the most good-looking man,” she said. “He could have been the one scientist in the world who could have developed extraordinary things for humanity, but he became a murderer. He would look at me and smile and at times I could not believe this man could ever hurt me, he could be so charming. But the next minute, he was cutting me up into little pieces.”

In 1945, Irene and Sabka were part of a group of 5,000 prisoners forced to march in the cold. Every day, weakened prisoners dropped dead around her. After two months, they escaped. Exhausted and covered in lice, they walked through the forest and managed to stay alive by digging up food.

The pair were finally liberated by Gen. George Patton’s Third Army, but Sabka died the very next day. Once again, Zisblatt lost her only family. After her recovery, she was taken in by relatives in America and began a new life with a new name. She married in 1956, and although she had been given watery soup filled with chemicals to destroy her reproductive organs, she gave birth to a son and a daughter in the 1960s.

Not wanting to remember her past, Zisblatt kept her mother’s diamonds in a vault. Years later, at her husband’s suggestion, she had the diamonds set into a pendant in the shape of a tear drop. She does not wear them regularly — only when she speaks to future generations.

Zisblatt had vowed that if she survived, she would be a voice for her fellow prisoners. But it was not until her son asked her about the Holocaust that she was ready to share her story.

“For 50 years, I didn’t say a word. I didn’t want my children to live with my pain,” she said.

After taking part in the March of the Living, a walk through the camps culminating in Israel, she began to share her story to educate children in order to rid the world of prejudice and indifference, and to teach future generations about the past and what hatred can do.

“I am a survivor of man’s hatred,” Zisblatt said. ‘We were dragged from our homes, robbed of our childhood, yanked from our mothers’ arms. I was living in a factory of death.”

‘The Fifth Diamond: The Story of Irene Weisberg Zisblatt’ is available at

When the article appeared on the Miami Herald website i did not recall being aware of Irene Zisblatt, who originally went public with her story around 1995. What struck as much as the content was the impeccable timing of it; after 50 years of silence, Zisblatt suddenly decided to go public at a time when Israel, the Zionist occupiers of Palestine, was ramping up its Cast Lead PR campaign in an attempt to justify its ongoing, U.S. backed genocide in Gaza which has resulted in thousands of Palestinian casualties. In what was an obvious attempt to divert public pressure on Israel for its ongoing ethnic cleansing campaign upon land it has stolen from the Palestinians, we see the holocaust card being played once again, this time in the form of a touching story about yet another alleged holocaust survivor. Norman Finkelstein effectively sums up Israels perverted use of the “holocaust card” during this brief and rather heated segment of a talk given to the students of the University of Waterloo in 2010:

Though the subject of the holocaust is a sensitive one, i feel compelled to analyze Zisblatt’s multifaceted story of her experience in the German concentration camps of World War II, even if it is largely devoid of original content. Part of my motive is to examine the numerous and extraordinary claims she has laid, but i think it is far more important to consider the enormous historical, psychological and political impact the holocaust continues to have upon the world almost 70 years after the close of the war.

Because those who question the official version of Jewish holocaust history open themselves up to criminal prosecution, ridicule and labels such as anti-Semite, neo-Nazi, racist and even self-hating Jew, i want to make it abundantly clear at the outset that i am not a member of any race related organization, nor do i hate any ethnic group based on religious beliefs, skin color, origin or any other common attribute, nor do i view my race as superior to another. All are welcome here, whether they be Jewish, Arab, German, Russian or otherwise, as it is not my intention to offend or judge any ethnic group or people. I believe that the vast majority of people are well intentioned and that the world would be a far better place if our inherent benevolent qualities and creativity were allowed to flourish instead of being suppressed by those powerful few who seem to lack even the most basic form of compassion found in the majority of us. Having said that, and where it concerns those few, extraordinarily powerful people who have unethical and criminal intentions, be they Jewish or otherwise, the gloves are off!

3.  The Claims – Investigating holocaust claims, part 1

“Care must be taken not to give a platform for deniers… or seek to disprove the deniers’ position through normal historical debate and rational argument” — Guidelines for Teaching about the Holocaust at the Stockholm International Forum, 2000

The first issue with Irene Weisberg Zisblatt is, who is Irene Weisberg Zisblatt? It appears she has used several names over the years including Irene Segelstern (Red Cross document), Irene Ziegelstein (Spielberg’s ‘Last Days’ testimony), Chana Seigelstein (autobiography), Irene Lewin (passenger manifest when relocating to America) and Irene Stein (taken after her husbands death). More concerning than the name changes however are her numerous claims and the many nontrivial alterations her story has undergone as events are altered, added and removed. Since many of these inconsistencies have already been cataloged by others, i will not bother to point out all of them here, but we will examine a few.

Many will undoubtedly be aware that many claims regarding the holocaust have been debunked long ago and are no longer accepted as factual by any serious historian, yet they are often regurgitated to this day and the story of Irene Zisblatt, which is very much like a catalog of holocaust cliches, is no exception. Such claims have the Nazis shrinking the heads of their victims, using human skin to make lamp shades, gloves and other goods, using the corpses of Jews to manufacture soap, oil, fertilizer and sausagestearing babies in half with their bare hands (try tearing in half a raw chicken from the market and you will quickly discover how impossible this claim is) and a myriad of others. Although some claims regarding the holocaust have their roots in fact, many are complete fabrications, based upon hearsay, or based upon the testimony of a single person. Others are not new, having surfaced during the First World War.

Several of these claims surfaced at the Buchenwald concentration camp which was liberated, in part, by United States troops in 1945. It is interesting to note that much of the evidence either simply vanished before the trials at Nuremberg, or was not allowed to be used as evidence. Explanations as to the origin of these claims is offered in the following documentary video:

In an article titled A Time ‘Too Painful’ to Remember, which was published in The New York Times in 1988 by the Jew Ari L. Goldman, another incredible claim regarding Buchenwald can be found:

Later, Mr. Hubert was sent to Buchenwald. ”In the camp there was a cage with a bear and an eagle,” he said. ”Every day, they would throw a Jew in there. The bear would tear him apart and the eagle would pick at his bones.” ”But that’s unbelievable,” whispered a visitor. ”It is unbelievable,” said Mr. Hubert, ”but it happened.”

The above claim does not exist even within the Buchenwald and Mittelbau-Dora Memorials Foundation website.

Another particularly malicious claim associated with the holocaust that is still widely believed is that soap was manufactured from the fat of dead Jews. Following is one example of this claim, though there are many more on the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM) website:

In 1941 the Germans took all of Przemysl. We were lined up with Germans aiming their guns at us. Then an officer ran up: “We need fat Jewish people for soap!” So instead of being shot, we were put on a train.

This statement would have us believe that a), apparently all of those that were to be shot were fat Jewish people; b), that is was necessary to transport live victims to the soap factory, where they would then be killed, c), that apparently Jews were in such short supply that the shooting needed to be stopped immediately, by an officer no less, and d) that the victim destined to become a bar of soap somehow escaped their destiny.

Soap made from the fat of Jews
Soap alleged to have been made from the fat of Jews was introduced as evidence during the Nuremberg Trials (click to enlarge)

Ironically, while the world is led to believe that such fantasies are factual by official institutions such as the USHMM and the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial Museum, even the Jewish Virtual Library tells us, however awkwardly, that no evidence exists to support that soap was made from human fat (emphasis added):

“It’s a general conception that the Nazis manufactured soap,” says [Michael] Berenbaum [author of The World Must Know: The History of the Holocaust as Told in the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum], who was project manager for the USHMM before it opened in 1993 and headed the museum’s research institute until 1997. “But those of us working in this area have not used it as an example [of Nazi atrocity] in the last 10 to 15 years. We don’t have any evidence that the Nazis actually manufactured soap with human bodies.”

When Berenbaum began putting the USHMM exhibit together, even he believed “it was obviously the case” that the Nazis produced soap from fat. “There was a question as to whether we would use soap in the exhibition,” he says. But after a thorough search, he adds, “I didn’t find any evidence of it. I found evidence for everything else that … the Nazis did and worse.”

The ultra pro-holocaust organization Nizkor, similarly tells us:

There was no industrial production, and the pieces of soap inscribed R.I.F. which Jewish victims were told were made of human fat were found to contain ordinary non-organic fats (R.I.F. means Reichsstelle fuer Industrielle Fettversorgung, or State Centre for Supply of Fats, and not Pure Jewish Fat, as the victims were told by the Nazis).

Since the information offered by the USHMM, the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial Museum and the Nizkor Project lacks relevant detail, we can see what the Institute for Historical Review (IHR) has to say regarding soap manufactured from human fat and where this malicious claim originated (emphasis added):

Human fat never used by Nazis
click to enlarge

One of the most lurid and slanderous Holocaust claims is the story that the Germans manufactured soap from the bodies of their victims. Although a similar charge during the First World War was exposed as a hoax almost immediately afterwards, it was nevertheless revived and widely believed during the Second. [1] More important, this accusation was “proved” at the main Nuremberg trial of 1945-1946, and has been authoritatively endorsed by numerous historians in the decades since. In recent years, though, as part of a broad retreat from the most obviously untenable aspects of the “orthodox” extermination story, Holocaust historians have grudgingly conceded that the human soap tale is a wartime propaganda lie. In their retreat, though, these historians have tried to dismiss the soap story as a mere wartime “rumor,” neglecting to mention that international Jewish organizations and then Allied governments endorsed and sanctioned this libelous canard.

Weber continues with the following (emphasis added):

More recently, Jewish historian Walter Laqueur “denied established history” by acknowledging in his 1980 book, The Terrible Secret, that the human soap story has no basis in reality. [29] Gitta Sereny, another Jewish historian, noted in her book Into That Darkness: “The universally accepted story that the corpses were used to make soap and fertilizer is finally refuted by the generally very reliable Ludwigsburg Central Authority for Investigation into Nazi Crimes.” [30] Deborah Lipstadt, a professor of modern Jewish history, similarly “rewrote history” when she confirmed in 1981: “The fact is that the Nazis never used the bodies of Jews, or for that matter anyone else, for the production of soap.” [31]

In April 1990, professor Yehuda Bauer of Israel’s Hebrew University, regarded as a leading Holocaust historian, as well as Shmuel Krakowski, archives director of Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust center, confirmed that the human soap story is not true. Camp inmates “were prepared to believe any horror stories about their persecutors,” Bauer said. At the same time, though, he had the chutzpah to blame the legend on “the Nazis.” [32]

In fact, blame for the soap story lies rather with individuals such as Simon Wiesenthal and Stephen Wise, organizations like the World Jewish Congress, and the victorious Allied powers, none of whom has ever apologized for promoting this vile falsehood.

Nazi hanging
The original photograph (bottom) was altered by the Soviets and used to vilify the Nazis (click to enlarge)

I will close the human soap fallacy with the following quote from the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH) website which provides more detail about the origin of this claim:

The history of the allegation can be traced back to September 1942, when Rabbi Stephen Wise (1874-1949) announced that he had received a message from an official of the World Jewish Congress in Europe reporting on the manufacture of soap and artificial fertilizer from Jewish bodies. Naturally, the report was greeted at the time with a certain amount of skepticism, since the Americans and British had already encountered such an allegation during the First World War: an allegation which had turned out to be Allied propaganda. (See Arthur Ponsonby, Falsehood in Wartime, IHR, 1980.)

Returning to Zisblatt’s claims, let us learn how she managed to keep her precious diamonds hidden from the Nazis during her internment at Auschwitz and elsewhere:

Zisblatt’s entire family was killed in the gas chambers, and those four diamonds were the last mementos of them. The only way Irene could keep the diamonds hidden was to swallow and retrieve them over and over again. She did this for 15 months.

Because it is likely impossible to verify whether Zisblatt’s mother actually gave her any diamonds in the context of the holocaust, we will assume this claim is true, though there is some evidence to suggest it may have been borrowed from another story.

In a video interview we shall see later, Zisblatt states that she was once forced to swallow her precious diamonds immediately after retrieving them from her feces without having had a chance to clean them, due to the unexpected presence of an SS guard. On other occasions she said the only way for her to clean them was to wash them in the mud, or even in the soup the prisoners were given to eat. The readily apparent problem with this last claim is the risk of contracting a variety of diseases from ingesting human fecal matter, some of which can be deadly.

Here Zisblatt repeats one of many claims that is quite popular among Jewish survivors of the Auschwitz concentration camp:

Zisblatt told the audience how, as a young prisoner in the camps, she was a favorite of Dr. Josef Mengele, who performed experiments and surgeries on her and other prisoners without anesthesia.

Nazi execution
The original photograph (bottom) was altered by the Soviets and used to vilify the Nazis (click to enlarge)

There is no question that atrocities were committed by all sides, both during and after the war, which is an atrocity in and of itself, nor is it unlikely that some of these consisted of medical experiments. The problem with this rather popular claim is that, in a camp which is said to have killed 90% of the Jews entering it, there seems to be an unusually large number of those who were Jewish and prisoners at Auschwitz — the “factory of death” — and who were favorites of Dr. Josef Mengele and who lived to tell about it and who do not seem to have any obvious signs of physical defects as a result of the alleged experimentation they had undergone.

Dr. Josef Mengele — the “Angel of Death” — is the infamous sadistic butcher of Auschwitz who preformed a wide variety of utterly gruesome medical experiments, often without anesthesia, upon those (mostly Jews) he did not immediately send to be murdered in the gas chamber upon arrival … or at least this is what we are told. The real Dr. Mengele appears to have been a far less dramatic character however, even according to the Josef Mengele page at the Jewish Virtual Library which states, in part:

Being a twin, regardless of age, meant survival in 1944. Some 3,000 children (or about 1,500 sets of twins) were selected for the experiments. They were not terrified of him but rather they were often intimidated by some of what he did. They knew of his temper and his passion for his work. Yet, they were also aware of his role in their survival. “Being on Mengele’s list was better than being on no list,” said Eva Mozes Kor.

Regarding medical experimentation, the Germans were certainly not the only ones preforming experiments upon human subjects, yet many will first recall the infamous Dr. Mengele before they will recall U.S. government and private industry, both of which have well established histories of preforming horrific experiments upon both individuals and entire populations without their knowledge or consent and, in some cases, against their will. This widespread practice continues to the present day and has included cruelties such as exposure to radiation, pathogens, toxins, mind control, torture and a great deal more, and these are only the instances we know about. Following is a small sampling of experiments preformed mostly by the U.S. from a document on the Natural News website:

(1845 – 1849) J. Marion Sims, later hailed as the “father of gynecology,” performs medical experiments on enslaved African women without anesthesia. These women would usually die of infection soon after surgery. Based on his belief that the movement of newborns’ skull bones during protracted births causes trismus, he also uses a shoemaker’s awl, a pointed tool shoemakers use to make holes in leather, to practice moving the skull bones of babies born to enslaved mothers (Brinker).

(1931) Cornelius Rhoads, a pathologist from the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, purposely infects human test subjects in Puerto Rico with cancer cells; 13 of them die. Though a Puerto Rican doctor later discovers that Rhoads purposely covered up some of details of his experiment and Rhoads himself gives a written testimony stating he believes that all Puerto Ricans should be killed, he later goes on to establish the U.S. Army Biological Warfare facilities in Maryland, Utah and Panama, and is named to the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, where he begins a series of radiation exposure experiments on American soldiers and civilian hospital patients (Sharav; Cockburn and St. Clair, eds.).

Guatemalans sue U.S. over medical experiments
click to enlarge

(1942) The Chemical Warfare Service begins mustard gas and lewisite experiments on 4,000 members of the U.S. military. Some test subjects don’t realize they are volunteering for chemical exposure experiments, like 17-year-old Nathan Schnurman, who in 1944 thinks he is only volunteering to test “U.S. Navy summer clothes” (Goliszek).

(1944) As part of the Manhattan Project that would eventually create the atomic bomb, researchers inject 4.7 micrograms of plutonium into soldiers at the Oak Ridge facility, 20 miles west of Knoxville, Tenn. (“Manhattan Project: Oak Ridge”).

(1945) Researchers infect 800 prisoners in Atlanta with malaria to study the disease (Sharav).

(1946) Gen. Douglas MacArthur strikes a secret deal with Japanese physician Dr. Shiro Ishii to turn over 10,000 pages of information gathered from human experimentation in exchange for granting Ishii immunity from prosecution for the horrific experiments he performed on Chinese, Russian and American war prisoners, including performing vivisections on live human beings (Goliszek, Sharav).

(1946) Continuing the Newburg study of 1945, the Manhattan Project commissions the University of Rochester to study fluoride’s effects on animals and humans in a project codenamed “Program F.” With the help of the New York State Health Department, Program F researchers secretly collect and analyze blood and tissue samples from Newburg residents. The studies are sponsored by the Atomic Energy Commission and take place at the University of Rochester Medical Center’s Strong Memorial Hospital (Griffiths and Bryson).

(1946 – 1947) University of Rochester researchers inject four male and two female human test subjects with uranium-234 and uranium-235 in dosages ranging from 6.4 to 70.7 micrograms per one kilogram of body weight in order to study how much uranium they could tolerate before their kidneys become damaged (Goliszek).

(1946 – 1953) The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission sponsors studies in which researchers from Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital and the Boston University School of Medicine feed mentally disabled students at Fernald State School Quaker Oats breakfast cereal spiked with radioactive tracers every morning so that nutritionists can study how preservatives move through the human body and if they block the absorption of vitamins and minerals. Later, MIT researchers conduct the same study at Wrentham State School (Sharav, Goliszek).

(1947) The CIA begins studying LSD’s potential as a weapon by using military and civilian test subjects for experiments without their consent or even knowledge. Eventually, these LSD studies will evolve into the MKULTRA program in 1953 (Sharav).

Possible MKULTRA victim. The caption reads “Un-identified white female between age of 8 and 10 years old. Subject underwent 6 months of treatment using heavy doses of LSD, electroshock and sensory deprivation. Experiments under codename: MKULTRA about early 60s. Subjects memory was erased and her brain is that of a newborn baby.” (click to enlarge)

(1948) Based on the secret studies performed on Newburgh, N.Y. residents beginning in 1945, Project F researchers publish a report in the August 1948 edition of the Journal of the American Dental Association, detailing fluoride’s health dangers. The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) quickly censors it for “national security” reasons (Griffiths and Bryson).

(1950 – 1953) The CIA and later the Office of Scientific Intelligence begin Project Bluebird (renamed Project Artichoke in 1951) in order to find ways to “extract” information from CIA agents, control individuals “through special interrogation techniques,” “enhance memory” and use “unconventional techniques, including hypnosis and drugs” for offensive measures (Goliszek).

(1950 – 1953) The U.S. Army releases chemical clouds over six American and Canadian cities. Residents in Winnipeg, Canada, where a highly toxic chemical called cadmium is dropped, subsequently experience high rates of respiratory illnesses (Cockburn and St. Clair, eds.).

(1951) The U.S. Army secretly contaminates the Norfolk Naval Supply Center in Virginia and Washington, D.C.’s National Airport with a strain of bacteria chosen because African-Americans were believed to be more susceptible to it than Caucasians. The experiment causes food poisoning, respiratory problems and blood poisoning (Cockburn and St. Clair, eds.).

(1952) At the famous Sloan-Kettering Institute, Chester M. Southam injects live cancer cells into prisoners at the Ohio State Prison to study the progression of the disease. Half of the prisoners in this National Institutes of Health-sponsored (NIH) study are black, awakening racial suspicions stemming from Tuskegee, which was also an NIH-sponsored study (Merritte, et al.).

(1953 – 1974) CIA Director Allen Dulles authorizes the MKULTRA program to produce and test drugs and biological agents that the CIA could use for mind control and behavior modification. MKULTRA later becomes well known for its pioneering studies on LSD, which are often performed on prisoners or patrons of brothels set up and run by the CIA. The brothel experiments, known as “Operation Midnight Climax,” feature two-way mirrors set up in the brothels so that CIA agents can observe LSD’s effects on sexual behavior. Ironically, governmental figures sometimes slip LSD into each other’s drinks as part of the program, resulting in the LSD psychosis-induced suicide of Dr. Frank Olson indirectly at the hands of MKULTRA’s infamous key player Dr. Sidney Gottlieb. Of all the hundreds of human test subjects used during MKULTRA, only 14 are ever notified of the involvement and only one is ever compensated ($15,000). Most of the MKULTRA files are eventually destroyed in 1973 (Elliston; Merritte, et al.; Barker).

(1953) The AEC performs a series of field tests known as “Green Run,” dropping radiodine 131 and xenon 133 over the Hanford, Wash. site — 500,000 acres encompassing three small towns (Hanford, White Bluffs and Richland) along the Columbia River (Sharav).

(1955 – 1957) In order to learn how cold weather affects human physiology, researchers give a total of 200 doses of iodine-131, a radioactive tracer that concentrates almost immediately in the thyroid gland, to 85 healthy Eskimos and 17 Athapascan Indians living in Alaska. They study the tracer within the body by blood, thyroid tissue, urine and saliva samples from the test subjects. Due to the language barrier, no one tells the test subjects what is being done to them, so there is no informed consent (Goliszek).

(1956 – 1957) U.S. Army covert biological weapons researchers release mosquitoes infected with yellow fever and dengue fever over Savannah, Ga., and Avon Park, Fla., to test the insects’ ability to carry disease. After each test, Army agents pose as public health officials to test victims for effects and take pictures of the unwitting test subjects. These experiments result in a high incidence of fevers, respiratory distress, stillbirths, encephalitis and typhoid among the two cities’ residents, as well as several deaths (Cockburn and St. Clair, eds.).

(1957 – 1964) As part of MKULTRA, the CIA pays McGill University Department of Psychiatry founder Dr. D. Ewen Cameron $69,000 to perform LSD studies and potentially lethal experiments on Canadians being treated for minor disorders like post-partum depression and anxiety at the Allan Memorial Institute, which houses the Psychiatry Department of the Royal Victoria Hospital in Montreal. The CIA encourages Dr. Cameron to fully explore his “psychic driving” concept of correcting madness through completely erasing one’s memory and rewriting the psyche. These “driving” experiments involve putting human test subjects into drug-, electroshock- and sensory deprivation-induced vegetative states for up to three months, and then playing tape loops of noise or simple repetitive statements for weeks or months in order to “rewrite” the “erased” psyche. Dr. Cameron also gives human test subjects paralytic drugs and electroconvulsive therapy 30 to 40 times, as part of his experiments. Most of Dr. Cameron’s test subjects suffer permanent damage as a result of his work (Goliszek, “Donald Ewan Cameron”).

(1958) The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) drops radioactive materials over Point Hope, Alaska, home to the Inupiats, in a field test known under the codename “Project Chariot” (Sharav).

(1963 – 1966) New York University researcher Saul Krugman promises parents with mentally disabled children definite enrollment into the Willowbrook State School in Staten Island, N.Y., a resident mental institution for mentally retarded children, in exchange for their signatures on a consent form for procedures presented as “vaccinations.” In reality, the procedures involve deliberately infecting children with viral hepatitis by feeding them an extract made from the feces of infected patients, so that Krugman can study the course of viral hepatitis as well the effectiveness of a hepatitis vaccine (Hammer Breslow).

(1966) U.S. Army scientists drop light bulbs filled with Bacillus subtilis through ventilation gates and into the New York City subway system, exposing more than one million civilians to the bacteria (Goliszek).

(1967) The CIA places a chemical in the drinking water supply of the FDA headquarters in Washington, D.C. to see whether it is possible to spike drinking water with LSD and other substances (Cockburn and St. Clair, eds.).

(1967) Researchers paralyze 64 prison inmates in California with a neuromuscular compound called succinylcholine, which produces suppressed breathing that feels similar to drowning. When five prisoners refuse to participate in the medical experiment, the prison’s special treatment board gives researchers permission to inject the prisoners with the drug against their will (Greger).

(1980) A study reveals a high incidence of leukemia among the 18,000 military personnel who participated in 1957’s Operation Plumbbob.

(1980) According to blood samples tested years later for HIV, 20 percent of all New York homosexual men who participated in the 1978 hepatitis B vaccine experiment are HIV-positive by this point (Goliszek).

AIDS linked to hepatitis experiments by CDC
AIDS linked to hepatitis experiments by CDC (click to enlarge)

(1980) The CDC continues its 1978 hepatitis B vaccine experiment in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, St. Louis and Denver, recruiting over 7,000 homosexual men in San Francisco alone (Goliszek).

(1980) The first AIDS case appears in San Francisco (Goliszek).

(1981) The CDC acknowledges that a disease known as AIDS exists and confirms 26 cases of the disease — all in previously healthy homosexuals living in New York, San Francisco and Los Angeles — again supporting the speculation that AIDS originated from the hepatitis B experiments from 1978 and 1980 (Goliszek).

(1982) Thirty percent of the test subjects used in the CDC’s hepatitis B vaccine experiment are HIV-positive by this point (Goliszek).

(1988) The U.S. Justice Department pays nine Canadian survivors of the CIA and Dr. Cameron’s “psychic driving” experiments (1957 – 1964) $750,000 in out-of-court settlements, to avoid any further investigations into MKULTRA (Goliszek).

(1990) The United States sends 1.7 million members of the armed forces, 22 percent of whom are African-American, to the Persian Gulf for the Gulf War (“Desert Storm”). More than 400,000 of these soldiers are ordered to take an experimental nerve agent medication called pyridostigmine, which is later believed to be the cause of Gulf War Syndrome — symptoms ranging from skin disorders, neurological disorders, incontinence, uncontrollable drooling and vision problems — affecting Gulf War veterans (Goliszek; Merritte, et al.).

(1990) The CDC and Kaiser Pharmaceuticals of Southern California inject 1,500 six-month-old black and Hispanic babies in Los Angeles with an “experimental” measles vaccine that had never been licensed for use in the United States. Adding to the risk, children less than a year old may not have an adequate amount of myelin around their nerves, possibly resulting in impaired neural development because of the vaccine. The CDC later admits that parents were never informed that the vaccine being injected into their children was experimental (Goliszek).

(1995) In the Mar. 15 President’s Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE), former human subjects, including those who were used in experiments as children, give sworn testimonies stating that they were subjected to radiation experiments and/or brainwashed, hypnotized, drugged, psychologically tortured, threatened and even raped during CIA experiments.

(1996) The Department of Defense admits that Gulf War soldiers were exposed to chemical agents; however, 33 percent of all military personnel afflicted with Gulf War Syndrome never left the United States during the war, discrediting the popular mainstream belief that these symptoms are a result of exposure to Iraqi chemical weapons (Merritte, et al.).

(2000) The U.S. Air Force and rocket maker Lockheed Martin sponsor a Loma Linda University study that pays 100 Californians $1,000 to eat a dose of perchlorate — a toxic component of rocket fuel that causes cancer, damages the thyroid gland and hinders normal development in children and fetuses — every day for six months. The dose eaten by the test subjects is 83 times the safe dose of perchlorate set by the State of California, which has perchlorate in some of its drinking water. This Loma Linda study is the first large-scale study to use human subjects to test the harmful effects of a water pollutant and is “inherently unethical,” according to Environmental Working Group research director Richard Wiles (Goliszek, Envirnomental Working Group).

(2004) In his BBC documentary “Guinea Pig Kids” and BBC News article of the same name, reporter Jamie Doran reveals that children involved in the New York City foster care system were unwitting human subjects in experimental AIDS drug trials from 1988 to, in his belief, present times (Doran).

Considering the above, one might find cause to reaccess the significance of the alleged experiments conducted by Dr. Josef Mengele during World War II and wonder if he is really worthy of the tile, “The Angel of Death”. In a performance evaluation of Dr. Mengele prepared by the Auschwitz SS Physician’s Office on 19 Aug., 1944, we read:

Dr. Mengele has an open, honest, solid character. He is absolutely reliable, upright and straightforward. He does not manifest any weakness of character, bad tendencies or cravings. His emotional and physical make-up is outstanding.

During his period of service at the Auschwitz concentration camp, he applied his practical and theoretical knowledge to combating severe epidemics. With prudence and persistent energy, and often under the most difficult conditions, he completed every assigned task to the complete satisfaction of his superiors. He showed himself capable of handling any situation. In addition, he used what little free time he had to ardently further his education as an anthropologist.

His tactful and modest deportment is that of a good soldier. Because of his demeanor, he is especially well liked by his comrades. He treats subordinates with absolute fairness and requisite severity, but is nevertheless exceptionally admired and liked.

In his behavior, work record and attitude, Dr. Mengele shows an absolutely solid and mature outlook on life. He is a Catholic. His speaking manner is spontaneous, uninhibited, convincing and lively.

Three more holocaust survivors claiming to be victims of Dr. Mengele, two Jewish sisters and a German woman, are featured in a 1994 episode of The Phil Donahue Show. In the first clip we meet Canadian Jew David Cole and research partner Bradley Smith. Both are very prominent revisionists who posit that homicidal gas chambers never existed in the German concentration camps and offer substantial evidence to support their conclusions. Prior to the Donahue show, Cole had produced a documentary film that was quite damaging to supporters of the homicidal gas chamber theory and which drew vicious verbal and physical attacks from the Jewish Defense League. A clip of Coles’ documentary is shown on the Donahue show, though the huge significance of the critically important evidence is completely overlooked:

Most of the remainder of the show seems to be dedicated primarily to attacking the two revisionists rather than considering the hard and compelling evidence they present. The audience, driven by years of holocaust propaganda and a heard mentality, offer vigorous applause each time the two are belittled.

In this next clip we first meet Dr. Michael Shermer, founding publisher of Skeptic Magazine. Though he is an exterminationist (one who believes homicidal gas chambers were used for mass extermination of the Jews in German concentration camps) he does make some critically important admissions which are again overlooked by both Phil Donahue and the audience. David apparently loses his composure during a break and walks off the show, after which we meet the first of the three alleged holocaust survivors, all claiming to have been experimented upon by Dr. Joseph Mengele:

In this next clip we meet Edith Glick who also claims to have been experimented upon by Dr. Mengele and whose sister in the audience had earlier stated she was quartered 20 feet from a homicidal gas chamber (the impossibility of which will become apparent later):

During this final clip a German woman, also claiming to be a holocaust survivor, phones in to tell her story. Sounding very distraught, she repeats several popular cliches associated with the holocaust, including witnessing lampshades made from human skin and soap made from human fat, as well as being experimented upon by Dr. Mengele and witnessing people being sent to the gas chambers to be killed; “I saw it all” she tells us:

David Cole made an earlier appearance in a 1992 episode of the Montel Williams Show along with Mark Weber, another well known Jewish revisionist and current director of the Institute for Historical Review. In contrast to the Donahue show, the debate is focused more on the evidence the revisionists present and the time allotted for both sides is divided more equally. The Montel Williams Show, which would later win an Emmy, was canceled in 2008 after Montel openly criticized the media for its failure to focus attention on U.S. military personal being killed in Iraq. The Phil Donahue Show would share a similar fate.

During the show we meet more holocaust survivors who again repeat the typical cliches, including one women who, like Edith Glick, claims to have been quartered near a homicidal gas chamber. Once again the evidence given by the exterminationists to counter that of the revisionists is largely reduced to meaningless statements such as “this whole discussion is crazy” and “it’s completely untrue”:

The Miami Herald article continues with three more experiments preformed by Dr. Mengele upon Zisblatt, one of which consisted of experimenting with methods to remove the identification tattoos that were given to prisoners of Auschwitz (emphasis added):

“Mengele injected chemicals into her eyes in an attempt to change their color and forced her to remain in a cold room for days. He injected viruses under Zisblatt’s fingernail and surgically experimented on her to find a way to remove the numbers tattooed on her arm. Afterward, he ordered the nurse to administer a lethal injection to both girls, but the nurse worked for the underground and was able to free them, one of many miracles Zisblatt experienced.”

To begin, one might envy not only Zisblatt’s formidable immune system capability, but also her ability to survive numerous, gruesome tortures at the hands of Dr. Mengele without suffering any apparent physical defects. Regarding the more interesting tattoo removal feature of her story, does it not seem odd that a camp doctor would be permitted to destroy the only method by which a prisoner could be identified, unless the intention was to replace it later? However it never was replaced and therefor Zisblatt not only lacks a tattoo to present as evidence she was a prisoner at Auschwitz, which is decidedly convenient, but the identification number she claims was issued to her, 61397, had actually been issued to Agnieszka Pastuszek, born Lutynia Dolna:

Auschwitz prisoner no. 61397
Prisoner number 61397 issued to Pastuszek, Agnieszka

There are also no results returned by the Auschwitz-Birkenau museum website for any of the names Zisblatt is said to have used, including Chana Seigelstein, or just the family name of Seigelstein, or the alternate spelling, Siegelstein. The USHMM website does return a single result for Irene Siegelstein (note the ‘i’ and the ‘e’ are reversed) that does seems to match, however she is not listed as ever being a prisoner at Auschwitz:

Siegelstein - Holocaust survivor database
Irene Siegelstein is not listed as ever having been a prisoner at Auschwitz or any other concentration, labor or transit camp

Another oddity regarding Zisblatt’s alleged tattoo removal (in a camp for which there seems to be no evidence she was a prisoner of) is that seven to ten days of experimentation was needed to discover a method of removing tattoos by Dr. Mengele in Auschwitz while Ilse Koch, over at Buchenwald, was practically mass producing lampshades made from tattooed human skin, or so we are led to believe. One might wonder why Dr. Mengele did not have the foresight to consult with the physicians at Buchenwald to learn the technique they employed rather than reinventing the wheel.

As far as managing to avoid a lethal injection because Mengeles’ nurse “worked for the underground”, i think i shall withhold comment on this fantasy, as well as the following quote from the Miami Herald article:

[…] although she had been given watery soup filled with chemicals to destroy her reproductive organs, she gave birth to a son and a daughter in the 1960s.

Zisblatt provides us with still more miracles in her video interviews. In the following segment she narrowly avoids being killed in the Auschwitz-Birkenau Krema III gas chamber because it was “too full” and therefore she became “stuck” in the door where she hangs on “for dear life”:

There are a number of problems with Zisblatt’s account in the video above, but perhaps most obvious is that, had she been familiar with the building whose eaves she hid under, she might have excluded the part about hiding under them since it simply wasn’t possible:

Auschwitz-Birkenau Krema III
Auschwitz-Birkenau Krema III

It may also be worth wondering why an SS guard would allow a defiant little 60 lb., four foot tall Jew girl to interrupt his busy work schedule rather than just shoot her on the spot. Ignoring that significant detail, Zisblatt then tells us that she was later dragged out from under the non-existent eaves of Krema III and rescued from Auschwitz by a young Hungarian Jew whose name she cannot remember, even though she had met and talked with him previously. Personally i think Zisblatt fails to properly credit this nameless boy who saved her life, for he seems to be an extraordinarily brave young man who was not only kind enough to giver her his jacket to cover her naked body (and she does seem to wind up naked a lot), but who risked his own life to help her escape her terminal fate at Auschwitz by carrying her a considerable distance to the camp railway where he somehow managed to throw her over a 10 foot high barbed wire fence onto a train car that was destined for another camp which, luckily for Zisblatt, was not in the business of gassing Jews. And thus Zisblatt managed to escape from the notorious Auschwitz, in broad daylight, apparently without drawing the attention of the Germans. How she managed to be received at the new camp without proper documentation is perhaps another miracle one may wish to consider.

In this next clip, Zisblatt repeats the defunct claim of lampshades made from human skin and how she narrowly avoided becoming one herself only because Ilse Koch, the “Bitch of Buchenwald” who wanted to make a lamp shade out of her, failed to show up for some reason in 1944… probably because she had been in a German prison since 1943:

In an article that appeared in the Gettysburg Times on 15 Jan., 1951, after the second trial of Ilse Koch we read:

Ilse Koch: No Proof of Human Lampshades
The trial of Ilse Koch. “One of the most revolting charges against her — that she had tattooed prisoners killed so she could have lampshades made of their skin — was dropped by the prosecution, which said it could not prove the charge.”

Unfortunately for the advocates of the human skin lampshades, none exist and the lampshades Ilse Koch left behind when she abandoned her Buchenwald home were found to have been made from goat skin, which is hardly surprising according to the Buchenwald Report which tells us that a factory at Buchenwald made leather products from animal skins. Following are a few quotes from General Lucius D. Clay, the interim military governor of the American Zone in Germany, after the conclusion of the first trial of Ilse Koch:

There was no convincing evidence that she had selected inmates for extermination in order to secure tattooed skins, or that she possessed any articles made of human skin.

And (emphasis added):

“There was absolutely no evidence in the trial transcript, other than she was a rather loathsome creature, that would support the death sentence. I suppose I received more abuse for that than for anything else I did in Germany. Some reporter had called her the “Bitch of Buchenwald,” had written that she had lamp shades made of human skin in her house. And that was introduced in court, where it was absolutely proven that the lamp shades were made out of goat skin.”

Later in a 1976 interview Clay stated:

We tried Ilse Koch … She was sentenced to life imprisonment, and I commuted it to three [four] years. And our press really didn’t like that. She had been destroyed by the fact that an enterprising reporter who first went into her house had given her the beautiful name, the “Bitch of Buchenwald,” and he had found some white lampshades in there which he wrote up as being made out of human flesh.

Well, it turned out actually that it was goat flesh. But at the trial it was still human flesh. It was almost impossible for her to have gotten a fair trial.

… The Germans picked her up and gave her 12 years for her treatment of her own people. But it wasn’t really a war crime in the strict sense of the word.

And those are the kinds of things that we had to deal with all the time.

In this final clip we witness Zisblatt making significant alterations to her story, one regarding prisoners committing suicide by willfully walking into an electrified fence and another regarding the death of her brother:

Returning to the Miami Herald article we learn how Zisblatt and her friend Sabka, whom she knows only by her first name, and who, interestingly, is one of only a few people at Auschwitz she is able to attach a name to, managed to survive after they escaped a forced march to another camp:

In 1945, Irene and Sabka were part of a group of 5,000 prisoners forced to march in the cold. Every day, weakened prisoners dropped dead around her. After two months, they escaped. Exhausted and covered in lice, they walked through the forest and managed to stay alive by digging up food.

Surviving in the wilderness is not a trivial task, even if only for a shot time under favorable conditions. During a Polish winter such an undertaking would require not only warm clothing, food, water and shelter, but also at least a cursory knowledge of what food is safe to eat and how to obtain these necessities. I would think the winter season is probably not the best time for a couple of young, starving, lice covered girls to acquire these survival skills, yet we are told the two girls, who were already exhausted from “two months” of walking, somehow managed to escape and survive in these harsh conditions, fortifying themselves by digging up food (in the possibly frozen ground) and knowing what was safe to eat. Although this formidable feat may be possible, i think it must be factored in with the rest of Zisblatt’s story and weighed accordingly.

Regarding her friend, Sabka, i do not think it is at all surprising that she, like Zisblatt, has no record of being imprisoned at Auschwitz according to all the registries i have checked, including the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial Museum database where i searched for “Sabka” both as a first name and a family name.

4.  The Scholar – Investigating holocaust claims, part 2

“[…] there was a Holocaust, which is, by the way, more easily said than demonstrated.” — Is There a New Anti-Semitism? A Conversation with Raul Hilberg, considered to be the world’s preeminent scholar of the Holocaust

Due to the numerous outlandish and provably false claims laid by Irene Zisblatt, several researches have had a field day dissecting her story, including Joachim Neander, PhD, a Polish scholar who has written publications regarding the holocaust in Poland, Germany, Israel and the United States, and had a Fellowship for Archival Research at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington D.C..

In 2010, Neander wrote an analysis of Zisblatt’s story titled ‘Irene Zisblatt, the “Diamond Girl” – Fact or Fiction?‘ in which he concludes that Zisblatt’s story is “not in accordance with the historically established facts” and “implausible”. He begins finding holes in her story early in her life, but here i will quote only a few of the more glaring inconsistencies he points out, beginning with her alleged induction into Auschwitz. If you will recall, Irene Zisblatt was born as Chana Seigelstein and that is how he refers to her here:

Chana’s head is completely shaved, and she receives the prisoner number 61397, which is tattooed on her arm (35).[25] Near by, she witnesses “women workers removing fillings and crowns, pulling gold teeth” from the registered prisoners (36). Before leaving, she receives “a pajama top” as her “only article of clothing,” and she is “forced to look into [a] large mirror” at the door, where she does not recognize herself – an additional act of humiliation. She is then marched, together with one thousand other women, “into a place called Birkenau,” to a wooden barrack (36) in “Lager C” (51), better known as “Camp sector BIIc.”

Apart from the fact that the prisoner reception building nowhere had “a huge mirror” into which the prisoners were forced to look, and that the Zugänge (intakes) received a little bit more of clothing than a pajama top that barely would have covered their nakedness,[26] the narration contains three major implausibilities. First, the Auschwitz prisoner number “61397? was given on September 9, 1943, to Agnieszka Pastuszek, a non-Jewish, Polish political prisoner,[27] who had arrived with a prisoner transport from Katowice prison.[28]. Hungarian Jewish women prisoners who were taken in between May 16 and 26, 1944, received numbers from A-3622 to A-6027.[29] Chana could also not have received the number of a dead prisoner because after February 2, 1942, Auschwitz prisoner numbers were no more issued twice.[30]

Second, the plundering of dental gold was carried out on the corpses of the dead, but never on living prisoners on intake. Third, if Chana had been registered on arrival, she would have been sent to one of the “regular” women camps, such as BIa or BIb. BIIc was used during the “Hungarian action” as a transit camp for non-registered Jewish women – who, therefore, had not been tattooed – and who on arrival had been spared from gassing. SS doctors regularly combed the transit camp for deportees who would be shipped into the Reich’s interior for slave labor (without registration at Auschwitz) or taken in at Auschwitz (and then registered there), and those who were sent to the gas chamber.[31]

Ilse Koch in prison
Ilse Koch prison photograph (click to enlarge)

Regarding Zisblatt’s claim of nearly having her skin harvested by Ilse Kock to make a lampshade out of her, Neander informs us why Ilse failed to show up that fateful day:

Chana soon realizes that she and the other fourteen Jewish girls were selected for a horrible fate: to become a lampshade (45). Ilse Koch, “an SS woman . . . a maniac . . . [who] likes human gloves made out of human skin and lampshades,” is “coming to Majdanek to select her material for the lampshades, and we have the skin for it.” Mrs. Koch, however, does not show up. [35] Small wonder, since she, as of August 25, 1943, has been sitting behind bars in the Weimar, Germany, Gestapo prison.[36] So, “after forty-eight immeasurable hours,” the group returns to Auschwitz, without having achieved anything (45).

Though long since debunked as a contemporary legend, lampshades allegedly made from victims of the Holocaust are a stock phrase in Holocaust remembrance.[37] It is, therefore, not surprising to find the legend in a book that serves its readers with nearly all Holocaust clichés.

Further along Neander comments on Zisblat’s claim of having her tattoo removed:

The tale of the removal of the prisoner numbers, however, is so full of implausibilities that it must be regarded as pure fantasy, and regretfully not as a good one. First, Mengele, a simple camp physician, by no means one of the camp brass, could never have dared to publicly remove the camp number, the one and only identification characteristic of a prisoner at Auschwitz,[60] from a prisoner’s body. (Six other SS members were allegedly present!) Second, he need not have made an “experiment” to this effect, as methods of removal of tattoos were well-known, and these were far less painful as the procedure described by Mrs. Zisblatt. Third, it would not have made sense to kill the test subject immediately after an experiment that allegedly should serve to find out how to remove “membership and […] blood type” tattoos from the bodies of SS men (64). It was an “experiment,” and Mengele would have had to wait for its outcome, how the wound was healing, if scars would remain, etc. Let us not forget that he saw himself as a “scientist.”

As mentioned previously, Zisblatt claims that she narrowly avoided the gas chamber at one point because it was “too full”, after which she was rescued by a familiar Hungarian Jew who threw her over the Auschwitz perimeter fence onto a rail car destined for another camp. Following is what Neander has to say regarding this epic feat:

This is the most implausible episode in Mrs. Zisblatt’s story. Let us omit the not quite unimportant change that the beginning of her story underwent between her video interview and the writing of her book, and let us rather concentrate on the events in the gas chamber. First, if indeed a frail little girl would have clung to the door of the gas chamber and so prevented its closing, the SS man at the door would have made short work of her: either cramming her into the gas chamber by force, or simply killing her on the spot. Second, a glance at the pictures of crematorium III (or its mirror image, crematorium II) shows that there was no place “under the roof” where a person could hide.[70]

Third, when 1,500 people were gassed, quite a few SS men were in and around the crematorium building. Chana would under no circumstances have remained undetected. Neither when she was running from the gas chamber through the “ramp” (?) to the eave, nor when she went from there together with the young man from the Sonderkommando to the electrified fence, nor when she was thrown over it. Fourth, the young man must have been an athletics champion, as the distance between the railroad tracks and the fence around crematorium III was over 100 ft., the fence had a height of about 10 ft., and Chana weighed about sixty pounds.[71] Fifth, if there had been a train with open cars[72] waiting with prisoners near the crematoria, it would have been guarded by SS personnel who doubtlessly would have noticed the unconventional arrival of Chana by “air lift.” And last not least, she would have been noticed at the latest at roll call on arrival, because her name would not have appeared in the transport list.

Although i think Joachim Neander has done a fair job of pointing out some of the many glaring flaws in Zisblatt’s story, he is obviously a supporter of the mainstream version of history, apparently ignoring the volumes of evidence to the contrary. What strikes me a bit odd in Neanders’ analysis of Zisblatt’s story is that he does not seem to realize that if gassings actually did take place in Auschwitz or elsewhere, Zisblatt and the other handful of alleged camp survivors who claim to have first-hand knowledge of homicidal gas chambers, would not have had to make up any stories or add any drama since the executions themselves would have provided plenty of authentic horror.

Carolyn Yeager has written her own analysis of Neanders’ analysis titled ‘Scholar: Holocaust survivor memoir is “exaggerated” & “implausible”‘ because she feels that Neander, who writes for some major publications regarding the holocaust, was actually too soft on Zisblatt, reasoning that he “wishes to maintain his reputation as a scholar”. In her article she points out a few additional inconsistencies in Zisblatt’s story which Neander overlooks.

Regarding Zisblatt’s claim of being put in a standing cell dungeon after Dr. Mengele put solution in her eyes to change their color, Yeager writes the following:

The version of the eye-experiment story in which the fifteen women were put into a small cubicle that was divided into little sections, designed so that they could walk into or touch the person in the section on either side only, was in Zisblatt’s Shoah testimony. In her book, the five girls are standing very close together in one small cell located below the Birkenau infirmary. If this is her idea of what “standing cells” were (after reading the literature about them), she has botched it up as she does everything else. The four Stehzellen alleged to be in the basement of Block 11 at Auschwitz (for which there is no definitive evidence beside witness testimony that they ever existed [1]; what is shown to visitors today are all reconstructions) were in the main camp, not in Birkenau. These reconstructions have a tiny door that would make it extremely difficult for each person to enter and be brought out again. According to official historiography, the alleged standing cells were torn down by order of Arthur Liebehenschel, the new camp commandant on December 1, 1943. [2] Assuming that this is so, they could not have existed when “Chana” and “Sabka” were being “experimented” on.

Zisblatt also claims to have had the fortune of meeting General George S. Patton in a hospital in Pilzen, Czechoslovakia, where he gave her his scarf and his four star “buttons”. Regarding this encounter, Yeager writes:

The fantastic account of American “Liberator” General George S. Patton meeting with Chana is one of the incidents that Neander decides to “set aside” on the grounds that “it is difficult to prove or disprove.” Difficult, perhaps, but not impossible to discover that Patton was never in the Volary or Pilsen area when Zisblatt claims she was there.

5.  The Miracles – Summary of the claims laid by Irene Zisblatt

“I knew that the next group that was going to come in was going to find me, and they were going to put me back in there [the gas chamber]. But for that moment I had hope, and then a miracle happened.” — Irene Zisblatt retelling her account of avoiding the gas chamber

At this point i think it is well worth recapping the many miracles we have extracted from the story of Irene Weisberg Zisblatt, an iconic and triumphant holocaust survivor who:

  1. managed to save 4 diamonds from being discovered by the Germans through repeatedly swallowing, defecating and retrieving them again for 15 months without contracting any life threatening diseases, despite not being able to clean them properly, or clean them at all in at least one instance
  2. managed to survive having viruses injected under her fingernails by Dr. Joseph Mengele without contracting any threatening diseases
  3. managed to survive having chemicals injected into her eyes by Dr. Mengele, apparently without any eye health issues
  4. managed to survive several days with no food or clean water in a filthy dungeon ankle deep in contaminated water in which she and her fellow prisoners defecated, sustaining herself by drinking the water in which they stood, once again without contracting any threatening diseases
  5. managed to survive having her tattoo removed through a series of experimental procedures, each lasting “hours at a time” over the course of a week to ten days, and which included “injecting”, “pulling”, “cutting” and “digging”, without anesthesia, and apparently without leaving a scar, due in part to the help of a sympathetic nurse who “worked for the underground” and placed pressure on the wound to stop the bleeding while Dr. Mengele was preoccupied
  6. managed to avoid a lethal injection ordered by Dr. Mengele due to his nurse who “worked for the underground” and who substituted a non-lethal injection
  7. managed to avoid becoming a lampshade in 1944 because Ilse Koch, who was in prison since 1943, failed to show up to harvest her skin
  8. managed to avoid the gas chamber because it was “too full”, later hiding under the eaves of a crematory which had no eaves to hide under
  9. managed to survive having been given a “watery soup filled with chemicals to destroy her reproductive organs”, later giving birth to two children
  10. managed to escape from the notorious Auschwitz “factory of death”, where there is no record of her internment there, due to the assistance of a young Hungarian Jew who threw her over a 10 foot high fence onto a train car destined for another camp
  11. managed to escape into the forest while on a forced march, sustaining herself by digging up food in the possibly frozen ground of a Polish winter
  12. managed to meet General George S. Patton in an American Army hospital in Pilzen, Checkoslovakia, where he bestowed upon her his scarf and four star insignia, even though he apparently could not have been there

While it is a certainty that many miracles were witnessed during the course of the war, the odds that any one of Zisblatt’s claims are authentic range from slim to none when they are measured against what we know to be factual today. Even if we cast aside the voluminous evidence that disproves and discredits her claims, one might wonder what the odds are that all of these miracles could be attributed to a single person.

Lastly, it is imperative that the reader understand that Zisblatt’s story, of which several elements are provably false and the remainder are highly unlikely, is not at all unique among the small number of alleged holocaust survivors who claim to have witnessed the mass extermination of the Jews. Unfortunately, the testimony from thousands of camp survivors whose testimony may discredit the official version of the historical events has been and continues to be suppressed. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum holds many thousands of these recorded testimonials, but makes it very difficult to access them unless you are an educator. Those that do make their way to video sharing sites such as YouTube, are quickly taken down and those that published them often have their accounts deleted..

6.  The Factory of Death – What was Auschwitz really like?

“I describe incidents which may or may not have happened but which are true.” — Elie Wiesel — writer, professor, political activist, Nobel Laureate and alleged holocaust survivor — quoted from, Elie Wiesel: Conversations

Auschwitz was a large complex of over 40 camps where desperately needed rubber and other materials were produced for the German war machine. The three primary camps there were Auschwitz I, the main camp, Birkenau, sometimes referred to as Auschwitz II, and Monowitz, or Auschwitz III. Birkenau was the work camp where the use of slave labor, though criminal indeed, was vital in the manufacture of materials for the war effort.

The camps in general were certainly not resorts, especially near the end of the war when conditions became so horrible due to the allied advance and other factors, including disease and lack of medical supplies, that they could not be considered habitable by any reasonable standard. Regarding Auschwitz, it is important however to point out what many tend to conveniently overlook, and that which further erodes the assumption that homicidal gas chambers were employed for mass extermination; along with a hospital and post office, there were several recreational and other prisoner facilities at the camp, including a swimming pool, cinema, library, kitchen, areas for music, art and sports, and even a brothel. From the camp stores, or cantinas, prisoners could purchase some convenience items such as cigarettes when they were available, using coupons or script received in return for their labor, or money sent to them by post. This is even admitted on the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum website, though this obscure and brief mention of it is the only one i could find:

[…] the payment of scrip that could be used in the camp canteen (which offered cigarettes and other low-value trifles for sale), and free visits to the camp bordello (which opened in the Monowice camp in 1943).

Ukrainian women's choir at Auschwitz
Ukrainian women’s choir at Auschwitz III (Monowitz) (click to enlarge)
Auschwitz Orchestra
Auschwitz orchestra (click to enlarge)
Auschwitz III Prisoner Dining Hall
Prisoner dining hall at Auschwitz III (Monowitz) (click to enlarge)
Auschwitz theater advertisment
Advertisements for theater and music at Auschwitz (click to enlarge)

The swimming pool is not always shown to visitors who tour Auschwitz and, when it is, they are told that, yes, it was a swimming pool, but only for the SS, or that, no, it is not a swimming pool, but rather a reservoir that was constructed for fighting fires. Besides the obvious contradiction of the Auschwitz tour guides, the claim that the swimming pool was not a swimming pool does not seem to ‘hold water’ when one examines the photographs and asks why a fire fighting reservoir was built in the shape of a swimming pool, complete with what clearly appear to be swimming pool amenities including a high dive, starter blocks and multiple ladders and steps leading into it. Likewise, the claim that it was a swimming pool, but only for the SS, also makes little sense when one considers why the SS, who were quartered clear on the other side of the camp, would want to swim in a pool which was located within the prisoner grounds and and exposed to angry Jewish inmates who would have liked nothing more than to drown them in their own pool, if it is true that they were responsible for sending their fellow prisoners to the gas chambers. I mean, if it were me, i would have at least peed in the pool and had a good laugh when those rotten SS guards jumped in to go swimming … in the fire fighting reservoir:

Sign at Auschwitz I swimming pool
Sign at Auschwitz I swimming pool telling visitors it was a fire brigade reservoir

In this photograph, note the fence line on the right and the prisoner barracks area on the left, showing that the pool was located where the prisoners had access to it (click the image to enlarge):

Auschwitz Swimming Pool
Swimming pool at Auschwitz, complete with diving platforms (click to enlarge)

Here we can better locate the pool, which was clearly within the barracks area of the camp and inside the electrified barbed wire fence, which is to the left of this image:

Auschwitz swimming pool (2)
The swimming pool at Auschwitz, showing its location in relation to the prisoner barracks area

If we search the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial Museum for the phrase “swimming pool“, only one relevant document is returned and in it, under the heading “THE FIRST TRANSPORT TO AUSCHWITZ”, we find the following statement from a polish prisoner who was transported there in 1940:

Stanislaw Bialas: The pool was pretty deep, and you could drown if you didn’t know how to swim. But if you paddled with your arms and legs, you could stay on the surface. We were in the water about 5 or 10 minutes.

A second statement in the same document by another Polish prisoner, who appears to have arrived at Auschwitz on the same transport, seems to imply that there may have been more than one swimming pool since the one pictured above was never enclosed:

Adam Jurkiewicz: There were inscriptions in Hebrew over the door, and there was a big room inside with a swimming pool, where they let us bathe.

Marc Klein, former professor at the Strasbourg medicine faculty and a former inmate at Auschwitz, wrote the following in his 1947 book, ‘Auschwitz I Stammlager’ (emphasis added):

The working hours were modified on Sundays and holidays, when most of the kommandos were at leisure. Roll call was at around noon; evenings were devoted to rest and to a choice of cultural and sporting activities. Football, basketball, and water-polo matches (in an open-air pool built within the perimeter by detainees) attracted crowds of onlookers. It should be noted that only the very fit and well-fed, exempt from the harsh jobs, could indulge in these games which drew the liveliest applause from the masses of other detainees.

If you search the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum for the words auschwitz “swimming pool”, again we discover almost nothing relevant except for one obscure document titled RG-50, which is a transcript of a recorded interview. In it we read:

40.24 A swimming pool was also built for non-Jews.

Unless there were threats of physical violence breaking out, there was no forced segregation in any of the camps that i am aware of, just as there was no segregation in the German military. While different ethnic groups may have preferred to gather amongst themselves, i have found no evidence that they were forced to so by the SS. Jews and others were treated equally and treated well for the most part, with the exception of the time period toward the end of the war when conditions in the camps became deplorable because of the pressure being applied by the allies.

Again, it is not my intention to assert that the German concentration, labor or transit camps were tantamount to resorts, nor that all of the prisoners had unrestricted access to all of the facilities all of the time. However in order to better understand what Auschwitz was really like, we cannot simply ignore the fact that a) these facilities existed, b), were located within the barracks area where the prisoners resided and c), their presence is not entirely consistent with a camp where one of the primary purposes is alleged to be the mass extermination of the German Jews and other undesirables. Considering all of the land available at the site, including the separate area were the SS were quartered, it seems ludicrous to posit that such facilities were built for use exclusively by the SS and camp staff, as is often implied.

If the reader should still doubt that the swimming pool was a swimming pool, i would suggest referring to a post titled Auschwitz 1: The Swimming Pool from someone who was there in January of 2012 and has provided still more evidence. Also a very nice panoramic view is available as a KML file which you can view in Google Earth if you have it installed.

7.  The Gas Chambers – Zyklon B and mass extermination of the Jews

“Given the nonsense that is turned out daily by the Holocaust industry, the wonder is that there are so few skeptics.” — Norman Finkelstein, Jewish American political scientist, activist, professor and author, quoted from his book ‘The Holocaust Industry’

Many of us assume that there must be testimony from perhaps many thousands of eyewitnesses which support the conclusion that homicidal gas chambers were used to kill millions of Jews, however this assumption is entirely untrue. From my research it has become clear that many, and perhaps most, of the inmates of the concentration camps which survived the war learned of the alleged gas chambers only after the war and the actual number of alleged eyewitnesses does not number in the thousands, or even the hundreds. From a document tiled Eye Witness Testimony of Homicidal Gassings in German Concentration Camps During World War II by Jürgen Graf, we read:

6. Are there really “Thousands of Witnesses”?
A person of average intelligence, confronted with the arguments of revisionists, is not going to question the superiority of documentary and forensic proof versus eye-witnesses, but will insist that it is impossible for “Thousands of Witnesses” to lie. Therefore the gas chamber stories must be essentially true even if the number of victims is inflated. This argument has a basic flaw. There are no “Thousands of Witnesses.” Only someone who saw what happened and can give a fair description of an event is assumed to be a witness. When at the court case in April of this year against the Swiss revisionist Gaston-Armand Amaudruz, in Lausanne, two former Jewish concentration camp inmates, Toman and Klein, appeared; the former a co-plaintiff, and the latter as a witness for the prosecution.[16] The press reported that they were gas chamber witnesses. But in reality, neither one of them admittedly witnessed a human gassing. They observed many people enter gas chambers and not leave them. (Toman and Klein further stated that they continually saw flames belching from the chimneys of the crematory, which is impossible, as any expert will attest). The two Jews at the Amaudruz court case are a typical example of many of the so-called gas chamber witnesses. They only convey what they heard from others or what they have read. The number of witnesses who actually describe gassings, number a few dozen at best. For decades, while reading “Holocaust” literature, the same names pop up: Höss, Broad, Vrba, Müller, Tauber, Dragon, Nyiszli, Bendel, Gerstein, Wiernic, and a few more. If one wants to examine the trustworthiness of those witnesses, as I did in my book Auschwitz: Perpetrator Confessions and Witnesses of the Holocaust,[17] he has a solvable job in front of him, since he only needs to concentrate on a few accounts. The whole “Holocaust” rests on their credibility.

No one denies that a variety of methods were used for disinfection to combat disease, primarily Typhus, including gas chambers, steam, hot air and and chlorine, but those of a homicidal nature is quite another matter. I am very much focused on the truth in this regard because it is the centerpiece of the Jewish holocaust and i have not concerned myself with where the chips may fall in my pursuit of it, however inconvenient the truth may be.

Though different types of gas are alleged to have been used for mass extermination of the Jews, the most prevalent method of execution is said to have been conducted using Zyklon B pellets to produce hydrogen cyanide gas (HCN) which causes death by asphyxiation. This lethal and highly flammable gas was used in the United States for the purpose of capital punishment up until 1999. Regarding exposure to hydrogen cyanide, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) states (emphasis added):

  • Hydrogen cyanide is highly toxic by all routes of exposure and may cause abrupt onset of profound CNS, cardiovascular, and respiratory effects, leading to death within minutes.
  • Exposure to lower concentrations of hydrogen cyanide may produce eye irritation, headache, confusion, nausea, and vomiting followed in some cases by coma and death.
  • Hydrogen cyanide acts as a cellular asphyxiant. By binding to mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase, it prevents the utilization of oxygen in cellular metabolism. The CNS and myocardium are particularly sensitive to the toxic effects of cyanide.

Since hydrogen cyanide is highly toxic by all routes of exposure, it is therefore toxic not only when inhaled, but also when absorbed through the skin. In spite of its lethality, the following is a most incredible account of a Jewish man, Moshe Peer, who alleges to be a holocaust survivor that was sent to the gas chamber at Bergen-Belsen no less than six times, surviving each instance (emphasis added):

As an 11 year-old boy held captive at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp during World War II, Moshe Peer was sent to the gas chamber at least six times. Each time he survived, watching with horrors as many of the women and children gassed with him collapsed and died. To this day, Peer doesn’t know how he was able to survive. “Maybe children resist better, I don’t know,” he said in an interview last week.

Unfortunately for Mr. Moshe Peer (and The Nizkor Project who quotes this utter nonsense in their ‘Scholar FTP Archives’) mainstream historians and revisionists alike now agree that there were no homicidal gas chambers at Bergen-Belsen, which is also the camp from where much of the photographs and film of bodies being bull-dozed and thrown in trenches was captured. As for nonsensical claim that children are more resistant to hydrogen cyanide gas, the Center for Disease Control has this to say:

Children exposed to the same levels of hydrogen cyanide as adults may receive larger doses because they have greater lung surface area:body weight ratios and increased minute volumes:weight ratios.

Allegations of homicidal gas chambers in German concentration camps have been debunked time and time again as more data is gathered and wartime propaganda is revealed to be just that; propaganda. In fact, there is no credible evidence of mass execution by gassing in any of the camps, nor is there a single wartime document alluding to a policy of exterminating the Jews. Paul Rassinier, a French revisionist, author, educator and prisoner at both the Buchenwald and Dora concentration camps from 1943 until the end of the war, writes:

With regard to gas chambers, the almost endless procession of false witnesses and of falsified documents to which I have invited the reader’s attention during this long study, proves, nevertheless, only one thing: never at any moment did the responsible authorities of the Third Reich intend to order — or, in fact, order — the extermination of the Jews in this or any other manner. Did such exterminations take place without orders? This question has haunted me for 15 years.

At the end of the war in 1945 it was said that exterminations occurred regularly at 22 camps throughout Germany and Poland using methods which included electrocution, carbon monoxide, hydrogen cyanide, steam and even boiling water. A mere 5 years later that figure was officially reduced to just 6 camps, all of which were located in Poland where they could not be properly examined because of their location behind the Iron Curtain which was controlled by the Soviets. Rassinier writes:

After a lecture tour I made in Germany covering a dozen cities, the Institute for Contemporary History (Institut für Zeitgeschichte) of Muenchen, a democratic institute, of course, was obliged on 19 August 1962 to state officially that “there were no gas chambers in any of the concentration camps in the territory called by the Nazis ‘Greater Germany,’ “none in Dachau, none in Bergen Belsen, Mauthausen, Ravensbrück, etc. One concludes that the witnesses in the 13 Nuremberg trials and in the Eichmann trial who stated under oath that there were gas chambers in these camps were no more than vulgar false witnesses.

If 16 camps have been dropped from the official record as a result of lies and propaganda, then why should we trust the officials regarding the remaining 6?

In addition to the many claims discussed and sources linked to in this document, there are numerous problems that supporters of the homicidal gas chambers have failed to address with anything that could be considered a reasonable argument, much less solid evidence, including the following:

  • Several gas chambers which are claimed to have been used for extermination by exposure to hydrogen cyanide (Zyklon B) or carbon monoxide gas were not hermetically sealed, some having multiple unnecessary openings, thus being completely unsuitable for containing any type of deadly and/or flammable gas, of which HCN is both.
  • Some of these facilities had unsealed floor drains that would have transported the gas to other buildings connected to the same drainage system, thus endangering the the lives of the occupants within those buildings as well, including some of which were occupied by the SS. Although some or all of the drains are presently sealed, it appears they were sealed after the war since we are told that, in some cases, the rooms were washed down after each gassing.
  • There is no blue staining or concentrations of hydrogen cyanide residue as would be expected as a result of repeated exposure to hydrogen cyanide gas in some of the facilities said to have been used for mass extermination, yet there is significant and clearly visible blue staining, as well as high levels of hydrogen cyanide residue, in the facilities where Zyklon B was used for delousing. This blue staining is resilient and penetrating enough that it can be abundantly clear even on the exterior walls of an enclosure that has been exposed to weather for 50+ years. The alleged washing of the gas chambers, as mentioned in the prior point, is used to explain the lack of blue staining on the walls and the hydrogen cyanide byproducts found in test samples in the alleged gas chambers, however those making this claim are apparently not aware that 1) water apparently has the opposite effect, making the cyanide residue penetrate deeper into the wall, and 2), the humidity as a result of evaporation from the washing would have greatly reduced the rate at which the hydrogen cyanide gas evaporated from the Zyklon B pellets, thereby making subsequent gassing operations dramatically less efficient. Furthermore, if we put aside the science that indicates otherwise and assume that water would have washed away the cyanide residue and the blue staining with it, then why is there significant blue staining present in the gas chamber at Majdanek, which is known to have been a gas chamber, but not at Auschwitz, which is alleged to be a homicidal gas chamber? If the gas chamber at Majdanek were used for homicidal purposes as alleged, would not it too have been washed down after the gassings?
  • Some of the non-gasketed doors were made of thin wood and had windows in them. In the event one might wonder whether the occupants would have broken the glass, or simply opened or broken the non-locking doors and walked out, the historians have an answer at the ready: there were guards standing outside who would shoot anyone trying to escape. Of course this claim is absurd for several readily apparent reasons; 1) there can be no conceivable reason to install a door with a large, breakable window to contain a highly flammable and extremely toxic gas in the first place. If one needed to inspect the interior during a gassing operation, a simple, port hole would have sufficed as in the case for the gas chamber door at Majdanek; 2), If the glass were broken for any reason, accidentally or otherwise, anyone standing on the other side would have been exposed to the hydrogen cyanide gas and the last thing on their mind would be punishing the person who broke the glass; 3), it is ludicrous to assume that the people inside a gas chamber who are being subjected to an excruciating death would make a conscious choice to die by choking rather than try to escape, regardless of the consequences; 4), again this claim fails to address the issue of the doors which were not gasketed and therefore could not have been used to seal an enclosure containing a deadly gas.
  • Some of the doors opened inwards which presents a rather significant problem when removing the bodies, some of which would have fallen against the doors, making them very difficult to open, or in the case of thin wooden household doors, likely impossible to open without destroying the door. Yet we are led to believe that the Germans, who were accomplished engineers, failed to consider this obvious problem. Even if this seemingly obvious issue was overlooked during the design process, why would the builder not correct the problem later as it would have been blatantly apparent that the doors could not be easily opened after the very first mass gassing?
  • Some of the doors could be opened from the inside and did not lock. Again we are told a lock was not necessary because a guard standing outside would have shot anyone trying to escape (a nonsensical claim that was addressed in an earlier point).
    Gas chamber door at Auschwitz
    Thin, wooden, non-hermetically sealed door with a breakable glass window which is said to be the door of an alleged homicidal gas chamber at Auschwitz (click to enlarge)
  • No proper mechanism existed in at least some of the alleged homicidal gas chambers to 1) safely introduce the Zyklon B pellets without exposing others in the vicinity to the deadly gas; 2), to heat the pellets to a temperature necessary to produce the hydrogen cyanide gas in a timely manner, especially in cold weather and/or humid conditions where the release could take several hours; 3) to distribute the gas within the enclosures which were, as we are told, tightly packed with people, which would have greatly hindered the flow of the gas; 4), to vent the gas after the operation was complete without putting everyone in the vicinity at risk of exposure, including SS personnel and other camp staff. Without a proper method of evacuating the gas, it is estimated that it could take days before the gas chamber could be safety reentered, yet we are told that each gassing took only minutes and up to 6000 people were gassed each day … or was it more than 20,000? The number of people said to have been processed per day, in any account, is impossible for multiple reasons, including the time required to kill a human with cyanide gas, the time required to evacuate the gas before the chamber could be reentered, the time to remove hundreds or thousands of bodies, and the time required to cremate the bodies. It is simple math, physics and logic problems such as these that exterminationists cannot overcome and it is precisely for this reason that Raul Hilberg and others make utterly absurd statements such as “there was a Holocaust, which is, by the way, more easily said than demonstrated”.
  • The gas chambers did not have explosion proof electrical fixtures which would have been required since hydrogen cyanide is extremely flammable at concentrations over 5.6%. While some argue that proper electrical fixtures were not necessary because the concentration of gas required to cause death is below 5.6%, it is quite obvious that not everything always proceeds according to plan and safety measures are put into place for this very reason. The only reasonable conclusion, especially when considering the safety features that were incorporated into the delousing facilities, is that explosion proof fixtures were not installed because there was no gas to explode and therefore the facilities claimed to be homicidal gas chambers were not homicidal gas chambers.
  • The facilities alleged to be homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz, which were actually mortuaries that doubled as air raid shelters, were in the same building as the crematory. The problem with locating these features in the same building without a secure, hermetically sealed barrier dividing them, is that any of the highly flammable hydrogen cyanide gas that leaked from the non-hermetically sealed gas chambers could have come into contact with the flames of the crematory ovens and caused a massive explosion.
  • Some of the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz and elsewhere were located near or next to other occupied buildings, including prisoner barracks, hospitals and buildings used by the SS and were also in clear view of the prisoners. Since the alleged gas chambers were not hermetically sealed and lacked proper venting, anyone in the vicinity would have been at risk of exposure to the hydrogen cyanide gas not only when it was released, but throughout the entire gassing process. This is also the reason why it is impossible for anyone to have been quartered near the alleged homicidal gas chambers, as several witnesses have claimed.
  • Claims that carbon monoxide gas from diesel engines was used for mass extermination are absurd because diesel exhaust contains far less carbon monoxide than the exhaust from a gasoline powered engine. While diesel exhaust can cause health problems such as lung cancer, it is an incredibly inefficient method of killing people.
  • Finally, there is no document which can prove that homicidal gas chambers were ever constructed or employed for mass extermination, whether for use with hydrogen cyanide or carbon monoxide gas, nor any document that alludes to a policy of exterminating the Jews.

Apparently when the guards outside the gas chamber at Auschwitz were preoccupied, people actually did try to escape, at least according to this account:

Secondly, most people tried to push their way to the door. It was psychological – they knew where the door was, maybe they could force their way out. It was instinctive, a death struggle. Which is why children and weaker people, and the aged, always wound up at the bottom. The strongest were on top. Because in the death struggle, a father didn’t realize his son lay beneath him.

This account at the Holocaust Education & Archive Research Team website confirms the above and offers a bit more detail on the integrity of household doors with windows in them:

The whole transport exactly filled the mortuary to capacity – the doors were then sealed and the gas shaken down through the holes in the roof. I do not know how long the killing took. For a little while a humming sound could be heard – when the powder was thrown in, there were cries of gas, then a great bellowing and the trapped prisoners hurled themselves against both doors.

But the doors held, they were opened several hours later, so that the place could be aired.

There is no explanation for the “humming” sound and this cannot be attributed to Zyklon B. The “cries of gas” are a bit more interesting since many people cannot smell hydrogen cyanide at all and those that can have described a faint bitter almond odor. Far more significant is the impossible robustness of the flimsy wooden doors and the windows in them, which were able to withstand the “death struggles” of prisoners who “hurled themselves against both doors”, especially when we account for the many thousands of people over the course of several years. At least the Germans were thoughtful enough to spare other prisoners in the vicinity of the gas chambers from having to listen to the screams of those being exterminated by running tractor engines to drown out the cries of the dying, according to the Jewish Virtual Library.

Another insurmountable problem faced by the exterminationists is one of how much time is required to kill the number of people said to have been killed. Let us consider the efficiency of the alleged homicidal gassing operations at the Auschwitz Main Camp, or rather the complete lack thereof (click to enlarge):

Lack of Efficiency of Alleged Homicidal Gassing Operations at Auschwitz I
Diagram depicting the very inefficient route prisoners followed during alleged gassings at Auschwitz I (click to enlarge)

The Auschwitz officials would have us believe that the gassing process resembled that which is illustrated in the diagram above. In such a scenario, we are told that thousands of prisoners each day were herded through several small rooms and narrow doors before gassing could begin. Afterwards the bodies would have to be transported, by hand, through a narrow doorway to the crematory ovens where they were incinerated. Finally the remains would have to be transported out of the building and be disposed of. Considering all the doorways and obstacles this building presents, this alleged process is completely nonsensical and staggeringly inefficient, yet the Germans are certainly not regarded as being inefficient. The layout of this building is logical only if it was a morgue and a crematorium where a relatively small number of bodies were processed.

Even if the overwhelming evidence that this building was used for homicidal purposes is ignored, as well as the science of hydrogen cyanide and other factors, it is obvious that each gassing operation would have taken many hours at a minimum and not the 20 or so minutes as is claimed by the exterminationists (whose entire holocaust story falls to pieces if it would have taken significantly longer). In breaking down the sequence of events, we must consider the following at a minimum:

  • The length of time required to move hundreds or thousands of people single-file through 3 narrow doors and 2, 90 degree turns into the gas chamber
  • The length of time required to fill the enclosure with gas
  • The length of time required to kill the occupants
  • The length of time required to evacuate the gas before the gas chamber could be safety reentered
  • The length of time required to drag the corpses through a narrow doorway to the crematory ovens
  • The length of time required to incinerate the bodies
  • The length of time required to remove the remains from the building

Most of the above steps might have required roughly 1/2 hour or more each with the exception of the cremation process which would have required approximately 50 hours if we assume a number of only 300 prisoners (we are told the “gas chamber” could hold several hundred). This time estimate is the result of simple and conservative mathematics where each corpse would take 1 hour to burn (it actually would have taken longer) in the 6 muffles (ovens) that were available and therefore 300 people / 6 muffles = 50 hours of incineration time. This same logic can be applied to the other alleged homicidal gassing facilities not only at Auschwitz, but throughout the rest of camps alleged to have been used for mass extermination.

Yet another conundrum the exterminationists have to contend with is the fact that the buildings alleged to be homicidal gas chambers are radically different in design than those used for non-homicidal purposes, the latter being properly constructed, hermetically sealed enclosures with the necessary ventilation systems, heating systems to warm the Zyklon B pellets so they could produce gas quicker, explosion proof electrical fixtures and a method to safely dispose of the expired pellets. The exterminationists counter this by telling us that the extremely poor design of the homicidal gas chambers was due to the fact that the task of building them was left to the camp staff to figure out. This claim completely overlooks the resources the Germans had available, including physical access to non-homicidal gas chambers as well as access to the professionals who built them. Because of the formidable challenges associated with the much larger size of the alleged homicidal gas chambers, including the increased hazards in terms of accidental exposure to nearby personnel, explosion, and stopping those inside from escaping, it is highly unlikely that the Germans would have completely overlooked these resources and started from scratch. The Germans obviously knew of the dangers associated with Zyklon B (they were printed on the containers for one) and would not have constructed gas chambers which had none of the attributes and safety features of the delousing facilities. Let us not forget that we are talking about a people who were pioneers in a number of fields, including rocketry and high performance aircraft (many of the German scientists relocated to the U.S. under Operation Paperclip at the close of the war and were largely responsible for the U.S. manned rocket program which led to a landing on the moon).

The following interview with Walter Schreiber, a supervising engineer for the construction of gas chambers, appears in a book written by German chemist Germar Rudolf titled ‘The Rudolf Report – Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz‘ (emphasis added):

These crematoria are entirely comparable in size, equipment, and manner of construction to other similar installations built in the Third Reich at that time, as well as with those built today. In this connection, reference is made to the trial of the builder of the cremation installations in Birkenau camp. In 1972, the court acquitted the two defendants, master builder W. Dejaco and master builder F. Ertl, since suspicion of aiding and abetting in mass murder could not be corroborated. An expert report drawn up during this trial on the surviving plans and documents on the construction of the crematoria led to the conclusion that these buildings could not have been used or modified so as to serve as instruments of mass murder. In an eyewitness statement made recently, one of the master builders at Auschwitz, Walter Schreiber, stated as follows on the planning of these crematoria:

Gas chambers used for delousing
Gas chambers used for delousing (click to enlarge)

Q: In which positions were you active?
A: As supervising engineer, I inspected the Huta Corporation and dealt with the Zentralbauleitung of the SS. I also audited the invoices of our firm.

Q: Did you enter the camp? How did that happen?
A: Yes. One could walk everywhere without hindrance on the streets of the camp and was only stopped by the guards upon entering and leaving the camp.

Q: Did you see or hear anything about killings or mistreatment of inmates?
A: No. But lines of inmates in a relatively poor general condition could be seen on the streets of the camp.

Q: What did the Corporation build?
A: Among other things, crematoria II and III with the large morgues.

Q: The prevalent opinion is that these large morgues were gas chambers for mass killings.
A: Nothing of the sort could be deduced from the plans made available to us. The detailed plans and provisional invoices drawn up by us refer to these rooms as ordinary cellars.

Q: Do you know anything about introduction hatches in the reinforced concrete ceilings?
A: No, nothing more from memory. But since these cellars were also intended to serve the auxiliary purpose of air raid shelters, introduction holes would have been counter-productive. I would certainly have expressed an objection to such an arrangement.

Q: Why were such large cellars built, when the water table in Birkenau was so extremely high?
A: I don’t know. Originally, however, above-ground morgues were to be built. The construction of the cellars caused great problems in retention and sealing.

Q: Would it be conceivable that you were deceived and that the SS nevertheless had gas chambers to be built by your firm without your knowledge?
A: Anyone who knows anything about what happens on a building site knows that that is impossible.

Q: Do you know any gas chambers?
A: Naturally. Everyone in the east knew about disinfection chambers. We also built disinfection chambers, which look quite different. We built such installations and knew what they looked like, even after the necessary installations. As a building firm, we often had work to do after installation of the machinery…

Q: When did you learn that your firm was supposed to have built gas chambers for industrial mass killing?
Only after the end of the war.

Q: Weren’t you quite amazed about it?
A: Yes! After the war I made contact with my former boss in Germany and asked him about it.

Q: What did you learn?
A: He also only learned about it after the war, but he assured me that the Huta Corporation certainly did not build the cellars in question as gas chambers.

Q: Would building alterations be conceivable after the withdrawal of the Huta Corporation?
A: Conceivable, sure, but I would rule that out on the basis of time factors. After all, they would have needed corporations again, the SS couldn’t do that on their own, even with inmates. Based on the technical requirements for the operation of a gas chamber, which only became known to me later, the building erected by us would have been entirely unsuited for the purpose in regard to the necessary machinery and practicable operation.

Q: Why didn’t you publish that?
A: After the war, first, I had other problems. And now it is no longer permitted.

Q: Have you been interrogated as a witness in this matter?
A: No Allied, German, or Austrian agency has ever taken an inteest in my knowledge of the construction of crematoria II and III, I or my other activity in the former general government. I was never interrogated in this matter, although my services for the Huta Corporation were known. I mentioned them in all my later CVs and recruitment applications. Since knowledge of the facts is dangerous, however, I never felt any urge to disseminate it. But now, when the lies are getting increasingly bolder and contemporary witnesses like myself are slowly but surely dying off, I am glad that someone is willing to listen and set down the way it really was. I have serious heart trouble and can die at any moment, it’s time now.

Sign at the Dachau 'gas chamber'
Sign at the Dachau shower room stating that it was a ‘gas chamber’ which was disguised as a shower and never used as a gas chamber (click to enlarge)

At the Dachau concentration camp in Germany, it was once alleged that hundreds of thousands of Jews were killed in a gas chamber disguised as a shower room. This allegation underwent several iterations as one after another was shown to be untrue. The current nonsensical claim is that, yes, Dachau had a gas chamber, but it was never used.

If you search the Dachau museum website for the words ‘gas chamber’, of course no results are returned since it is no longer alleged that executions by gassing took place there even by the exterminationists, yet visitors are still led to believe that the Nazi’s intended to preform executions by gassing at the camp.

What is particularly interesting about Dachau is that United States government officials, including Eisenhower himself, visited the camp and were shown the “gas chamber” as evidence of the holocaust and the brutality of the Germans. In preparation for their arrival, a false ceiling was added and it was made to resemble a gas chamber. This lie was sold to the public, the U.S. congress, and presented as fact at the Nuremberg trials.

From the Nuremberg trial transcript, page 470, we read:

Inside the showerbath [ at Dachau]- the gas vents. On the ceiling- the dummy shower heads. In the engineers’ room- the intake and outlet pipes. Push buttons to control inflow and outtake of gas. A hand-valve to regulate pressure. Cyanide powder was used to generate the lethal smoke. From the gas chamber, the bodies were removed to the crematory.

The fact that there were no homicidal gas chambers at Dachau did not stop the Americans from murdering up to 150 camp guards by shooting them in a coal yard during the liberation of the camp.

The entire farce of the Dachau “gas chamber” is described in greater detail in the following video:

It is admitted even by the exterminationists that the vast majority of Zyklon B was used for delousing purposes, not homicidal. Typhus reached epidemic proportions both within the concentration camps and throughout Europe. Neither the exterminationists nor the revisionists deny the Germans were disinfecting people, clothing, bedding and buildings to combat Typhus and other diseases, or that prisoners were given hair cuts and uniforms for the same reason. Does this not cast a bit of doubt on the sinister reasons we are given for the piles of clothing, hair and empty Zyklon B containers we are repeatedly subjected to in the Jewish controlled media? What do these images really tell us when the accompanying cliches are stripped away? The Germans were working to preserve life by delousing clothing and cutting hair to rid the people of parasites, yet this simple truth is twisted into something infinitely more sinister that would have the world believe that the treatment of disease is proof that the Germans were murderous monsters. While i am not insinuating they were all angles, we must be honest and brave enough to open our minds to the facts and question what it is we think we know about their role in the so-called holocaust.

According to the books, ‘The Hoax of the Twentieth Century‘ by Arthur R. Butz and in ‘The Auschwitz Myth: Legend or Reality‘ by Wilhelm Stäglich, the rumors of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz began with three Jews; Alfred Wetzler, Rudolf Vrba and Rabbi Michael Dov Ber Weissmandel. These rumors were then promoted by representatives of the World Jewish Congress. From ‘How the British Obtained the Confessions of Rudolf Höss‘ by Robert Faurisson, we read:

We have known for some time that the Auschwitz myth is of an exclusively Jewish origin. Arthur R. Butz has related the facts in his book, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, as has Wilhelm Stäglich in The Auschwitz Myth. The principal authors of the creation and the peddling of the “rumor of Auschwitz” have been, successively, two Slovaks, Alfred Wetzler (or Weczler) and Rudolf Vrba (or Rosenberg or Rosenthal); then a Hungarian, Rabbi Michael Dov Ber Weissmandel (or Weissmandl); then, in Switzerland, representatives of the World Jewish Congress like Gerhard Riegner, who were in touch with London and Washington; and finally Americans like Harry Dexter White, Henry Morgenthau Jr. and Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise. Thus was born the famous World Refugee Board Report on Auschwitz and Birkenau, published in Washington in November 1944. Copies of this report were included in the files of the judges advocate general in charge of prosecuting the Germans involved in the Auschwitz camp. It constituted the official version of the story of the alleged gassing of the Jews in that camp. Most probably it was used as a reference work by the inquirers-interrogators-torturers of “the Commandant of Auschwitz.” All the names here mentioned are those of Jews.

In his book ‘The Hoax of the Twentieth Century’ in the chapter ‘The War Refugee Board (WBR) Report: Birth of the Auschwitz Legend’, Butz writes:

The high level Washington commitment to the claim that Auschwitz was an extermination camp came in November 1944, after the claimed termination of the killing program, in the form of the WRB report (the claim had appeared many times in the propaganda earlier in 1944; those stories are reviewed in Chapter 5). The issuing of the report was carried by the New York Times on November 26, 1944, (page 1) and some excerpts were given. The WRB report is described as two reports, one written by “two young Slovakian Jews” and the other by “a Polish major,” all of whom had been inmates at Auschwitz from the spring of 1942 until the spring of 1944, when they escaped (the two Jews on April 7).

There is an additional short supplement said to be written by two other young Jews who escaped on May 27, 1944, and made their way to Slovakia (under German domination until 1945) to make their report, which is said to have been received in Switzerland on August 6, 1944. The authors are completely anonymous, and this anonymity is duly apologized for “whose names will not be disclosed for the time being in the interest of their own safety.”

In his memoir, ‘From the Depths’, Rabbi Michael Dov-Ber Weissmandel writes:

May 15th, 1944 – In a cave near Lublin, Poland.

Sholom and Greetings.

We send you this special message to inform you that yesterday the Germans began the deportation of Jews from Hungary. It is the beginning of deportation of all the Hungarian Jews.

Every day, twelve thousand souls are being taken off. Four deportations of forty-five such train-loads move daily out of Hungary. Within twenty six days all that area will have been deported.

The deported ones go to Auschwitz to be put to death by cyanide gas. A great number are dead on arrival. The Germans allow a few of the strongest to stay alive. Those who are allowed to live are branded with a number burned into their arm and the Star of David burned into their chest.

Most of these privileged ones die within a month. Others take their place.

Those who go directly from the train to the gas chambers to be suffocated are not branded. They are completely consumed in the ovens and leave no evidence behind. These are 95% of each transport.

The dead bodies are burned in specially made ovens. Each oven burns 12 bodies an hour. In February there were 36 ovens burning. We have learned that more have been built.

Information supplied us by a few eyewitnesses reveals that in February there were four disposal buildings. We have learned that more have been built since then.

Formerly, the Germans killed and burned the Jews in the Forest of Birkenwald, near Auschwitz. Now the killing and burning take place in the buildings shown on the enclosed map.

In December, the Germans built special trains to transport the Jews of Hungary to their extermination. This is the schedule of Auschwitz, from yesterday to the end; twelve thousand Jews – men, women and children, old men, infants, healthy and sick ones – are to be suffocated daily and their bones and ashes are to be used to fertilize the German fields.

First, let us consider some of the flaws in Weissmandel’s memoir:

  1. The Star of David was never “burned” into the chests of Jewish prisoners at Auschwitz or anywhere else, a claim that is not mentioned even on the USHMM website.
  2. It is not even remotely possible to cremate 12 bodies per hour in a single crematory oven, a process which takes an hour or longer per body in a modern day crematory oven.
  3. Obviously 12,000 Jews could not have been killed daily in homicidal gas chambers that did not exist, however even if we imagine they did exist, simple mathematical calculations make this claim utterly impossible.
  4. There is no evidence that crematory remains were used to manufacture soap, fertilizer, or anything else.

More important than the flaws in Weissmandels’ writings however is the insight they give us as to approximately when these rumors surfaced, who fabricated them and for what purpose:

“We are not denying and are not afraid to confess that this war is our war and that it is waged for the liberation of Jewry… Stronger than all fronts together is our front, that of Jewry. We are not only giving this war our financial support on which the entire war production is based, we are not only providing our full propaganda power which is the moral energy that keeps this war going. The guarantee of victory is predominantly based on weakening the enemy forces, on destroying them in their own country, within the resistance. And we are the Trojan horses in the enemy’s fortress. Thousands of Jews living in Europe constitute the principal factor in the destruction of our enemy. There, our front is a fact and the most valuable aid for victory.” — Chaim Weizmann, President of the World Jewish Congress, Head of the Jewish Agency and later President of Israel, in a Speech on December 3, 1942, in New York.

“In losing Germany, Jewry lost a territory from which it exerted power. Therefore it was determined to re-conquer it.” — Louis Marschalko, “The World Conquerors: The Real War Criminals.”

8.  The Bodies – What caused the death of so many?

“It is easier to believe a lie one has heard a hundred times than a truth one has never heard before.” — Robert S. Lynd, American sociologist, The Passion of Labour (pg. 67)

Corpses at Buchenwald concentration camp in Germany
Corpses at Buchenwald concentration camp in Germany (click to enlarge)

We have all seen the corpses in images, documentary films, Hollywood movies and our classrooms; piles of them everywhere being thrown into ditches, bulldozed into trenches or just lying in the open waiting to be disposed of. These images, burned into our minds over so many years along with the accompanying rhetoric, present what may be the greatest stumbling block toward critical thinking one may ever face. we all saw the piles of dead bodies! How can anyone question that 6 million Jews were sent to the gas chambers by the Nazis after witnessing these atrocities with our own eyes? However it is only when we break through the programming that we have been inundated with since children and let go of what it is we think we know, that we are able to digest the truth. This does not mean that you must permanently expunge your current beliefs, but rather that you set them aside temporarily while you reexamine the evidence with a clear head. With this in mind, look again at the photograph of the pile of corpses and see if you can determine what the cause of death might have been. The photograph was captured at the Buchenwald concentration camp in Germany where there were no homicidal gas chambers, a fact agreed upon by both exterminationists and revisionists alike. The majority of the deaths in the camp occurred in the final months of the war and were caused, not by gassing, torture or firing squad, but by Typhus.

Almost all of the photographs and film of corpses we have seen share three common traits; 1) the time frame in which they were captured, 2), nearly all of the bodies are emaciated and 3), no unusual discoloring is apparent in the fresher corpses. While these clues may not seem significant at first glance, they do offer significant clues as to a possible cause of death.

The photographs of the corpses were captured in 1945 after the camps were liberated and when the conditions in them were at their absolute worst. Typhus had reached epidemic proportions throughout Europe, but the problem was compounded in the camps due to severe overcrowding as prisoners were consolidated to those further from the advancing allies. Bombing had been taking place on a massive scale throughout Europe resulting in many thousands of civilian deaths and piles of corpses along the streets were a common site, as were they in the camps. Supply routes and other infrastructure were destroyed, including railways which were vital for transporting food and medical supplies to the camps and elsewhere. Given these conditions, is it at all surprising that many thousands would have died from disease and starvation? It is estimated that 500 people perished daily in Bergen-Belsen alone toward the end of the war, primarily from Typhus. The Germans obviously did not anticipate a problem of this magnitude and the number of corpses greatly overwhelmed their capacity to properly dispose of them.

If there was a policy to exterminate the Jews and they were herded into gas chambers as soon as they arrived at the concentration camps, as we are told, then why is it they were not emaciated when they arrived, yet they are in the photographs? Starvation is a side effect of Typhus however.

Lastly, cyanide poisoning sometimes causes very distinct, bright red to pink patches on the skin that would be visible on the fresher corpses, even in higher quality gray-scale photographs.

An article from eMedicineHealth states:

The skin of a cyanide-poisoned person can sometimes be unusually pink or cherry-red because oxygen will stay in the blood and not get into the cells.

From an eNotes article titled Suicide Investigation:

Cyanide turns to lethal hydrogen cyanide gas on contact with the acid of the stomach. Hydrogen cyanide prevents the body’s cells from using oxygen; this gives the blood a characteristic pink color that will be evident to the pathologist on autopsy. The victim’s face is often a brick-red hue after cyanide poisoning.

From the book Forensic Pathology, Second Edition by Dominick DiMaio and Vincent J.M. DiMaio M.D.:

The gastric mucosa and blood will have a bright red color. Livor mortis is often bright pink. This coloration is caused by cyanide’s inhibiton of the cytochrome oxidase system, which prevents utilization of circulating oxyhemoglobin. It is oxyhemoglobin that gives the bright pink color to the blood, not cyanohemoglobin, which is not formed in any significant quantity in life. If a strong solution of potassium or sodium cyanide was ingested, there may be some alkaline burns of the gastric mucosa. If there was some vomiting of the material, these burns might be seen in the skin adjacent to the mouth. If hydrogen cyanide is inhaled, the only changes at autopsy are a bright pink color to the blood and livor mortis.

Unknown to many is the fact that autopsies were conducted on a large number of corpses after the camps were liberated. It is very telling indeed that the autopsy reports were not entered as evidence during the Nuremberg trials. The Institute for Historical Review has the following to say regarding Dr. Charles Larson, a pathologist and member of the U.S. War Crimes Investigation Team, who preformed hundreds of autopsies on concentration camp corpses:

When American and British forces overran western and central Germany in the spring of 1945, they were followed by troops charged with discovering and securing any evidence of German war crimes.

Among them was Dr. Charles Larson, one of America’s leading forensic pathologists, who was assigned to the US Army’s Judge Advocate General’s Department. As part of a US War Crimes Investigation Team, Dr. Larson performed autopsies at Dachau and some twenty other German camps, examining on some days more than 100 corpses. After his grim work at Dachau, he was questioned for three days by US Army prosecutors. [1]

Dr. Larson’s findings? In an 1980 newspaper interview he said: “What we’ve heard is that six million Jews were exterminated. Part of that is a hoax.” [2] And what part was the hoax? Dr. Larson, who told his biographer that to his knowledge he “was the only forensic pathologist on duty in the entire European Theater” of Allied military operations, [3] confirmed that “never was a case of poison gas uncovered.” [4]

Dr. John E. Gordon, M.D., Ph.D., professor of preventive medicine and epidemiology at the Harvard University School of Public Health, who was with U.S. forces in Germany in 1945, said:

Most deaths in the concentration camps were caused, not by starvation or maltreatment but by typhus.

In an article titled ‘Disease killed Nazis’ prisoners, MD says‘ we read:

Thousands of prisoners who died at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp during WWII weren’t deliberately starved to death but died from a rash of diseases, according to a psychiatrist who was there in 1945.

From the trial of Ernst Zundel, currently a political prisoner in Germany, Emil Lachout read the following evidence from a Circular Letter of the Military Police Service dated October 1, 1948:

Military Police Service Copy

Circular Letter No. 31/48 Vienna, 1 Oct. 1948 10th dispatch

1. The Allied Commissions of Inquiry have so far established that no people were killed by poison gas in the following concentration camps: Bergen-Belsen, Buchenwald, Dachau, Flossenbürg, Gross-Rosen, Mauthausen and its satellite camps, Natzweiler, Neuengamme, Niederhagen (Wewelsburg), Ravensbrück, Sachsenhausen, Stutthof, Theresienstadt.

In those cases, it has been possible to prove that confessions had been extracted by tortures and that testimonies were false.

This must be taken into account when conducting investigations and interrogations with respect to war crimes.

The result of this investigation should be brought to the cognizance of former concentration camp inmates who at the time of the hearings testified on the murder of people, especially Jews, with poison gas in those concentration camps. Should they insist on their statements, charges are to be brought against them for making false statements.

From a document titled THE RUDOLF VERDICT AS PRONOUNCED BY MANNHEIM DISTRICT COURT On 2 May 2007, we read (emphasis added):

# 6 What about those pictures of mountains of dead bodies in the concentration camps?

Here is a photograph of victims of the typhus epidemic in a mass grave on the concentration camp in Bergen-Belsen, taken by the British Army. It is typical of a large number of such photos often shown on TV Holocaust documentaries either without commentary or else with allegations that the dead are victims of the Holocaust. In fact, it is a photograph of victims of an epidemic which occurred at war’s end. The cause of death is evident from the condition of the corpses. If they had been gassed they would not be emaciated and if they had died of starvation they would have swollen joints and stomachs. Any medical professional will see at first glance that these people died of typhus.

All photographs of heaps of corpses were taken in Western camps around the end of the war, such as Dachau, Bergen-Belsen, and Buchenwald, where historians now agree no mass murders took place. Significantly, there are no such photographs taken at the camps in which mass murder is alleged to have occurred (Auschwitz, Treblinka, Belzec, Sobibor, Chelmno, Majdanek.) These eastern camps were all in areas which came under Soviet control at war’s end. It is very telling that the Soviets released no pictures of mass graves or heaps of corpses and allowed no journalists, medical professionals, or other experts to examine the camps. Since the end of the 1980s, Revisionists have been investigating these sites for evidence of mass murder, but the officials have obstructed their efforts by all possible means.

In the absence of authentic photographs documenting mass murder, it frequently happens that photographs of those who died in the Western camps at war’s end of malnutrition and typhus are presented as evidence of deliberate mass murder. To be sure, the hellish conditions in the Western camps at war’s end convinced many Allied observers that mass murder had taken place, so that initial reports to that effect are understandable. In reality, these conditions resulted from a situation for which the German government was not solely responsible. Toward the end of the war, Himmler illogically ordered the evacuation of the eastern camps as the Red Army approached, which led to hopeless overcrowding in the western camps. By that time, Allied bombing had completely destroyed the German infrastructure, making it impossible to supply the camps with food, medicines, and sanitation supplies. Misunderstandings about the causes of the massive die-off continue to this day, especially among Americans. The respected leftist historian Norbert Frei has given the following reason for misinterpretation, (from Vi erteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 35 (1987) page 400):

The allied destruction of Dessau, Germany, 1945
The allied destruction of Dessau, Germany, 1945 (click to enlarge)

“The shock of these discoveries [of mountains of corpses] often led to false conclusions which turned out to be enduring.”

There is no denying that a government which imprisons people in camps is responsible for them and so the unjustly imprisoned were therefore victims of the Third Reich, even if they died “only” of disease. However, one should not overlook the fact that by the war’s end, mountains of corpses had become commonplace throughout Germany. In German cities there were 600,000 victims of Allied terror bombings. Millions more died of starvation and disease, which continued rampant through 1949. In Eastern Germany and Czechoslovakia, three million Germans were murdered by Serbs, Czechs, Poles, and Russians in the course of history’s bloodiest ethnic cleansing. In the POW camps of the western Allies, a million young German men died and millions more allowed to vegetate. Hundreds of thousands more were shipped to the labor camps of the Soviet Gulag never to be seen again. But the media show only one variety of corpse piles, those in the concentration camps. We should ask ourselves why this is so.

Should the dignity and respect that we owe the victims of atrocities, depend on their nationality?

From the book The Hoax of the Twentieth Century – The Case Against The Presumed Extermination Of European Jewry by Arthur R. Butz, we read about the allied destruction of the railways which were vital for transporting supplies to the camps:

The conditions in the camps had forced the German government, in March 1945, to take the final step in reversal of its earlier policy of absolute exclusion of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) from the concentration camps (existing conventions covered POWs, not concentration camp inmates). On March 29, 1945, SS General Kaltenbrunner authorized the ICRC to place one delegate in each camp for the purpose of distributing relief supplies, on the conditions that the delegate remained there until the end of the war. The ICRC organized road transport for relief supplies (use of the rail- ways was out of the question) […]

And again, regarding the railways:

The German rail system was in utter chaos and conditions in April 1945 are difficult to imagine […]

And this, regarding the cause of death (emphasis added):

The causes for the dead bodies which were found at the camp when it was captured were described in a 1948 publication of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. As the US Army advanced into Germany, it encountered the sorts of conditions which its medical services had anticipated and for which they had prepared counter-measures:

“Germany in the spring months of April and May was an astounding sight, a mixture of humanity traveling this way and that, homeless, often hungry and carrying typhus with them. […] The more territory that was uncovered, the greater was the number of reported cases; for Western Germany in the areas of the American advance was rather uniformly seeded with typhus. To be sure, there were heavily involved communities and others lightly affected. There were great accumulations of cases in the concentration and prison camps, and in nearby small communities.

As estimated 35,000-40,000 prisoners were found in [Dachau], living under conditions bad even for a German camp of this kind and worse than any other that came into American hands. Extreme filthiness, louse infestation, and overcrowding prevailed throughout the camp buildings. Several car-loads of human bodies were found packed in box cars in the railroad yards adjacent to the camp, the vestiges of a shipment of prisoners from camps further north who were transferred to Dachau in the late days of the war to escape the advancing United States troops.

The number of patients with typhus fever at the time the camp was first occupied will never be known. Days passed before a census of patients could be accomplished. Several hundreds were found in the prison hospital, but their number was small compared with the patients who continued to live with their comrades in the camp barracks, bed-ridden and unattended, lying in bunks 4 tiers high with 2 and sometimes 3 men to a narrow shelf-like bed; the sick and the well; crowded beyond all description; reeking with filth and neglect – and everywhere the smell of death.”

It is not surprising that Dachau had experienced catastrophes very similar to those at Belsen. Since the beginning of 1945, there had been an estimated 15,000 prisoner deaths from typhus, mostly in the final two months.

9.  The Math – Why holocaust math doesn’t add up

“These numbers do matter,” Hilberg said. “They also matter for the very simple reason … call it religious if you like.” — excerpt of an interview conducted with Raul Hilberg (considered by some to be the worlds preeminent holocaust historian), The Guardian, March 2001

Holocaust MathSeveral chemists, scientists, scholars, lawyers, historians, mainstream officials and a gas chamber execution expert have questioned the validity of the homicidal gas chamber claims, each offering very substantial evidence to support that the official account is, at a minimum, flawed, especially in the case of Auschwitz. Even the Auschwitz Memorial Museum lowered its death tally for the total number of people who died at the most notorious “death camp”, of all causes, from about 4.1 million to about 1.1 million around 1989. This figure is also quoted by the Anti Defamation League in their hit piece on Carolyn Yeager:

Yeager claims that Auschwitz was not an extermination camp and that Nazi guards looked after the health of inmates. Reputable scholars estimate that 1.1 million people, 90% of them Jewish, died at Auschwitz.

I wonder if these might be the same “reputable scholars” that made the 3 million blunder earlier and had once agreed that Ilse Koch was making lampshades out of people and that the Germans were busy paving the Autobahn with the crushed bones of Jews (when they were not making soap out of them)?

Auschwitz plaque - number murdered
Original plaque (top) at the Auschwitz museum was replaced as a result of evidence from the Zundel trial (click to enlarge)

Visitors arriving at Auschwitz prior to 1989 would have seen a memorial plaque near the entrance which stated that 4 million people died at the hands of the Nazi murders between 1940 and 1945. After 1989 however, the number of deaths attributed to the Nazis was officially reduced by Franciszek Piper to 1.1 million and the old plaque was replaced with a new one which states that 1.5 million died, which is of course .3 million more than the number stated on the museums own website. Even the lower figure of 1.1 million is contradicted on the same website:

Once the mass deportations began in 1942, the Jews became the most numerous ethnic group in Auschwitz. A total of about 1,100,000 Jews were deported to Auschwitz from 1940 to 1945; some 960,000 of them perished there (865,000 of them in the gas chambers immediately after arrival, and about 95,000 of the 200,000 Jews registered as prisoners).

Most disturbing is that, although the death toll was lowered by 3 million, the infamous ‘6 million‘ figure representing the total number of Jewish holocaust victims during the Second World War was never adjusted accordingly. This seems to suggest that perhaps holocaust mathematics, where 6,000,000 – 3,000,000 = 6,000,000, is quite unlike the mathematics many of us have become accustomed to in grade school. It is significant and blatantly obvious discrepancies such as these that are too often overlooked by those who do not wish to have their neck stomped on by the jackboot of antisemitism which is eternally poised to strike any who dare challenge the official version of Jewish holocaust history. The real threat to the establishment is not one of numbers however, as we shall demonstrate later.

Whatever the actual figure for Auschwitz may be, and there is a wealth of compelling evidence that it is far less than 1.1 million, it is imperative to understand that this figure includes all deaths of all people from all causes, including Typhus which caused the vast majority of those deaths, yet the plaque clearly states that these people were murdered by the Nazis. While it is certainly reasonable to attribute many deaths to the war, either directly or indirectly, is it not a stretch to insinuate that people who died of disease were murdered in homicidal gas chambers? And let us not forget who first declared war upon who.

Poland reduces Auschwitz death toll
Poland reduces Auschwitz death toll (click to enlarge)

Perhaps the most significant issue here is not so much the reduction of 3 million or more victims from the official record while allowing the 6 million figure to stand, but that it is perfectly acceptable for mainstream historians to revise their figures, while any revisionist attempting to do the same, Jewish or otherwise, and regardless of the validity of the evidence presented, is automatically branded as a Jew-hating/Nazi loving/anti-Semite/loony who must be avoided like the plague and locked up, freedom of speech be damned.

Regarding the total number of deaths during the war which can be attributed to persecution, Barbara Kulaszka writes in her book ‘Did Six Million Really Die? – Report of the Evidence in the Canadian ‘False News’ Trial of Ernst Zundel’:

Doubtless, several thousand Jewish persons did die in the course of the Second World War, but this must be seen in the

context of a war that cost many millions of innocent victims on all sides. To put the matter in perspective, for example, we may point out that 700,000 Russian civilians died during the siege of Leningrad, and a total of 2,050,000 German civilians were killed in Allied air raids and forced repatriation after the war. In 1955, another neutral Swiss source, Die Tat of Zurich (January 19th, 1955), in a survey of all Second World War casualties based on figures of the International Red Cross, put the “Loss of victims of persecution because of politics, race or religion who died in prisons and concentration camps between 1939 and 1945″ at 300,000, not all of whom were Jews, and this figure seems the most accurate assessment.

Red Cross Record of Deaths in German Concentration Camps
Red Cross record of deaths in German concentration camps (click to enlarge)

What should be a vital clue that could shed light on the actual number of Jews that lost their lives during the war are the census figures. Unfortunately it seems all but impossible to compile an accurate account of even the world Jewish population for the war years, much less by geographic region. Compounding the problem is emigration, the moving of geographic borders, estimated verses actual figures, what data is included, what data is excluded, the source of the data, revisions to the data, how the data is compiled and by whom, who is considered a victim of the holocaust and who is not, fraud, and even who is considered to be Jewish. I can only suggest reading some of the material in the resources section for those who wish to pursue this course, particularly ‘Arthur R. Butz: The Hoax of the Twentieth Century‘ and ‘Did Six Million Really Die? by Richard Harwood‘. Many more documents can be found at the CODOH and IHR libraries. Lastly, even the official numbers do not support 6 million Jews killed — a figure which is more symbolic than anything else and is repeated numerous times throughout Jewish history since the late 1800’s.

6 Million Jewish Victims Before Alleged Holocaust
1938: 6 million Jews persecuted before the alleged holocaust
The Crucifixion of the Jews Must Stop! -1919
The Crucifixion of the Jews Must Stop! – The American Hebrew, 1919 (click to enlarge)

10.  The Man – Was Hitler the monster we have been led to believe?

“We have no doubt about your bravery or devotion to your fatherland, nor do we believe that you are the monster described by your opponents.” — Mahatma Gandhi in a letter to Adolf Hitler, 1940

Much like the so-called gas chambers, so too is the legacy of Adolf Hitler shrouded in myth and lies bestowed upon us by the Soviets and Jewish interests who stand to lose their geo-political grip as well as a significant stream of revenue if the truth about Hitler were to be disseminated on a large scale. Here again we must be willing to put aside what we have been told through our educational institutions, the mainstream media and our governments before we can reconsider who Adolf Hitler really was from a fresh perspective. Was he the monster as we are repeatedly told, hell-bent on world domination and the destruction of the Jews?

Hitler’s bravery and patriotism cannot be questioned. During the First World War he repeatedly volunteered for hazardous duty and was injured on several occasions, one of which left him temporarily blind as a result of exposure to mustard gas. Regardless of his injuries, he always returned to his unit as soon as possible even though he was not always obligated to return at all. RIR Sergeant Max Amann, 1916:

Hitler never hesitated in the least in carrying out even the most difficult order, and very often took on the most dangerous duties for his comrades. Couriers for the regimental staff had to be among the most reliable people, because serving as a regimental courier during battles and skirmishes required iron nerves and a cool head. Hitler always did his duty, and even after his severe thigh wound, [he] volunteered to be sent back to his regiment from the reserve battalion, immediately after his release from the hospital.

During one battle, armed only with a pistol, Hitler single-handedly captured 5 French soldiers. For this and other courageous acts he was awarded the prestigious Iron Cross, 1st class, which was not only a rare and great honor, but also an award which a mere corporal was highly unlikely to receive. In a citation signed by Baron von Godin, 1918:

As a dispatch runner, he has shown cold-blooded courage and exemplary boldness both in positional warfare and in the war of movement, and he has always volunteered to carry messages in the most difficult situations and at risk of his life. Under conditions of great peril, when all the communications lines were cut, the untiring and fearless activity of Hitler made it possible for important messages to go through. Hitler received the Iron Cross Second Class for gallant conduct during fighting at Wytschaete on 1 Dec 1914. [He] fully deserves to be awarded the Iron Cross First Class.

Hitler would be awarded a total of 6 medals for bravery during combat, including a second Iron Cross, this one of the 2nd class.

Nazi Rally, Nuremberg, 1934
Nazi Rally, Nuremberg, 1934 (click to enlarge)

After the close of World War I, Germany faced a serious threat of being taken over by the millions of communists residing within, many who were Jewish. Outraged by this, as well as by the Treaty of Versailles which had gutted and vilified Germany, the young Adolf Hitler decided to pursue a career in politics and joined the revolutionary National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP), eventually becoming its leader in 1921. In 1933 he was appointed Chancellor of Germany and by 1939 had the most popular leader in all of Europe where approximately 90% of the nearly 80 million German people supported him, despite the Fascist dictatorship he had set up (It seems the people were willing to tolerate a police state as long as it meant that the cloud of darkness hanging over Germany would be lifted).

The admiration the people of Germany freely bestowed upon Hitler is abundantly clear in the enthusiastic crowds he drew everywhere he went, especially in Nuremberg, Munich and Berlin were some of the largest crowds the world has ever seen had been assembled. He enjoyed such overwhelming support because he earned it with numerous achievements that were accomplished within a very short time while no one else had offered any viable solutions to the problems the Germans faced. It is likely that no country before or after Hitlers Germany has seen such a rapid and complete rise from the depths of poverty, chaos and social dysfunction. The people of Germany had placed their hopes for the future upon Adolf Hitler and he delivered. Some of his many accomplishments include:

  • Restoring the German economy and eliminating massive unemployment by creating approximately 6 million jobs while much of the rest of the world was still reeling from the Great Depression of 1929 (likely caused by Jewish bankers).
  • Cleaned up the massive crime, drug, prostitution and pornography problems, especially in Berlin where there had been about 270,000 suicides in 1932 alone.
  • Created various social programs, including financial support for expectant mothers.
  • Conceptualized the Volkswagen, a reliable and inexpensive car that nearly every German could afford.
  • Expanded the autobahn — a system of highways stretching across Germany.
  • Introduced government subsided vacations for German workers.
  • Promoted environmentalism.
  • United the German people and restored their dignity.

The circumstances of Hitler’s rise to power was fittingly encapsulated by Ernst Zundel during a 1996 interview conducted by an Israeli journalist, during which he stated that “Hitler was an organic outgrowth to Jewish behavior“. One might question what role Jewish behavior played in their expulsion from 80 countries prior to World War II, as well as in many more where they were persecuted in various other ways, according to Jewish history.

Not popular with the mainstream historians are the many attempts Hitler made to resolve the growing tensions peacefully and avoid the Second World War altogether. Those who wanted war however, would have nothing to do with any offer of peace:

  • 17 May, 1933, Hitler delivers a speech declaring that Germany is willing to disarm if the neighboring countries would reciprocate, stating in part:

Germany will be perfectly ready to disband her entire military establishment and destroy the small amount of arms remaining to her, if the neighboring countries will do the same thing with equal thoroughness.

  • 18 Dec., 1933, Hitler submits a six point proposal for the improvement of international relations. The last point was:

6. The European nations guarantee one another the unconditional maintenance of peace by the conclusion of non-aggression pacts, to be renewed after ten years.

  • 26 Jan., 1934, Hitler completes a non-aggression pact with Poland.
  • 21 May, 1935, Hitler makes another attempt to avoid the growing possibility of war, stating in a speech:

Germany declares herself ready to agree to any limitation whatsoever of the caliber-strength of artillery, battleships, cruisers and torpedo boats. In like manner the German Government is ready to accept any international limitation of the size of warships. And finally it is ready to agree to limitation of tonnage for submarines, or to their complete abolition in case of international agreement.

  • 18 Jun., 1935, Hitler negotiated a Naval agreement with Great Britain in which it was stated that Germany was to have a naval strength limited to 35% of that of the British Navy.
  • 31 Mar., 1936, Hitler formulates a comprehensive plan for peace, stating in part:
Adolf Hitler with children
click to enlarge

The German Government believes that with the peace plan proposed above it has made its contribution to the reconstruction of a new Europe on the basis of reciprocal respect and confidence between sovereign states. Many opportunities for such a pacification of Europe, for which Germany has so often in the last few years made her proposals, have been neglected. May this attempt to achieve European understanding succeed at last!

  • 30 Sep., 1938, Hitler makes an agreement with the British Prime Minister, stating in part:

We regard the agreement signed last night and the Anglo-German Naval Agreement as symbolic of the desire of our two peoples never to go to war with one another again.

We are resolved that the method of consultation shall be the method adopted to deal with any other questions that may concern our two countries, and we are determined to continue our efforts to remove possible sources of difference and thus to contribute to assure the peace of Europe.

  • 6 Dec., 1938, Hitler instructs the German Foreign Minister to make an agreement with France which states, in part:

The German Government and the French Government fully share the conviction that peaceful and good-neighborly relations between Germany and France constitute one of the most essential elements for the consolidation of the situation in Europe and the maintenance of general peace. The two Governments will in consequence use all their efforts to ensure the development of the relations between their countries in this direction.

  • 23 Aug., 1939, Hitler signs the German-Soviet Nonaggression Pact.
  • 3 Sep., 1939, Great Britain and France declare war on Germany followed by India, Australia and New Zealand. Several more countries soon follow.
  • 6 Oct., 1939, after war had been declared on Germany, Hitler makes a speech, stating in part:

In the war with Poland, I endeavored to restrict aerial warfare to objectives of military importance, or only to employ it to combat resistance at a given point. But it must surely be possible to emulate the Red Cross in drawing up some universally valid international regulation. It is only when this is achieved that peace can reign, particularly on our densely populated continent a peace which, un-contaminated by suspicion and fear, will provide the only possible condition for real economic prosperity. I do not believe that there is any responsible statesman in Europe who does not in his heart desire prosperity for his people. But such a desire can only be realized if all the nations inhabiting this continent decide to work together. To assist in ensuring this co-operation must be the aim of every man who is sincerely struggling for the future of his own people.

Following is a quote from Hitlers broadcast in Berlin to the German people, 1941:

This conspiracy of democratic Jews and Free Masons dragged Europe into war two years ago. Arms had to decide.

Since then a struggle has been taking place between truth and lies and, as always, this war will end in the victory for truth. In other words, whatever lies British propaganda, international world Jewry and its democratic accomplices may concoct they will not change historical facts. And it is a historical fact that for two years now Germany has been defeating one opponent after another.

I did not want it. Immediately after the first conflict I again held out my hand. I have been a soldier myself and I know how difficult it is to win a victory.

My hand was rejected. And since then we have seen that each peace offer was immediately exploited by the warmonger Churchill and his confreres so that they could say it was proof of our weakness.

In a political testament authored on 29 April, 1945, the day of his death, Hitler wrote:

My Political Testament

More than thirty years have now passed since I in 1914 made my modest contribution as a volunteer in the first world war that was forced upon the Reich.

In these three decades I have been actuated solely by love and loyalty to my people in all my thoughts, acts, and life. They gave me the strength to make the most difficult decisions which have ever confronted mortal man. I have spent my time, my working strength, and my health in these three decades.

It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted the war in 1939. It was desired and instigated exclusively by those international statesmen who were either of Jewish descent or worked for Jewish interests. I have made too many offers for the control and limitation of armaments, which posterity will not for all time be able to disregard for the responsibility for the outbreak of this war to be laid on me. I have further never wished that after the first fatal world war a second against England, or even against America, should break out. Centuries will pass away, but out of the ruins of our towns and monuments the hatred against those finally responsible whom we have to thank for everything, international Jewry and its helpers, will grow.

Three days before the outbreak of the German-Polish war I again proposed to the British ambassador in Berlin a solution to the German-Polish problem—similar to that in the case of the Saar district, under international control. This offer also cannot be denied. It was only rejected because the leading circles in English politics wanted the war, partly on account of the business hoped for and partly under influence of propaganda organized by international Jewry.

I have also made it quite plain that, if the nations of Europe are again to be regarded as mere shares to be bought and sold by these international conspirators in money and finance, then that race, Jewry, which is the real criminal of this murderous struggle, will be saddled with the responsibility. I further left no one in doubt that this time not only would millions of children of Europe’s Aryan peoples die of hunger, not only would millions of grown men suffer death, and not only hundreds of thousands of women and children be burnt and bombed to death in the towns, without the real criminal having to atone for this guilt, even if by more humane means.

After six years of war, which in spite of all setbacks will go down one day in history as the most glorious and valiant demonstration of a nation’s life purpose, I cannot forsake the city which is the capital of this Reich. As the forces are too small to make any further stand against the enemy attack at this place, and our resistance is gradually being weakened by men who are as deluded as they are lacking in initiative, I should like, by remaining in this town, to share my fate with those, the millions of others, who have also taken upon themselves to do so. Moreover I do not wish to fall into the hands of an enemy who requires a new spectacle organized by the Jews for the amusement of their hysterical masses.

I have decided therefore to remain in Berlin and there of my own free will to choose death at the moment when I believe the position of the Fuehrer and Chancellor itself can no longer be held.

Adolf Hitler feeding deer
click to enlarge

I die with a happy heart, aware of the immeasurable deeds and achievements of our soldiers at the front, our women at home, the achievements of our farmers and workers and the work, unique in history, of our youth who bear my name.

That from the bottom of my heart I express my thanks to you all, is just as self-evident as my wish that you should, because of that, on no account give up the struggle but rather continue it against the enemies of the Fatherland, no matter where, true to the creed of a great Clausewitz. From the sacrifice of our soldiers and from my own unity with them unto death, will in any case spring up in the history of Germany, the seed of a radiant renaissance of the National-Socialist movement and thus of the realization of a true community of nations.

Many of the most courageous men and women have decided to unite their lives with mine until the very last I have begged and finally ordered them not to do this, but to take part in the further battle of the Nation. I beg the heads of the Armies, the Navy, and the Air Force to strengthen by all possible means the spirit of resistance of our soldiers in the National-Socialist sense, with special reference to the fact that also I myself, as founder and creator of this movement, have preferred death to cowardly abdication or even capitulation.

May it, at some future time, become part of the code of honour of the German officer—as is already the case in our Navy—that the surrender of a district or of a town is impossible, and that above all the leaders here must march ahead as shining examples, faithfully fulfilling their duty unto death.

11.  The Motive – Why no one wanted the Jews

“Whilst large sections of the German nation are struggling for the preservation of their race, we Jews fill Germany with our vociferations. We supply the press with articles on the subject of its Christmas and Easter. We ridicule the highest ideals of the German nation and profane the matters which it holds sacred.” — Dr. Manfred Reifer, well known leader of the German Jews, Czernowitzer Allegemeine Zeitung magazine, Sep., 1933

The events leading up to World War II are generally widely misunderstood; Germany had neither the military capacity nor the intention of world domination and this was clearly not a goal the German people aspired to. It has long bothered me that Adolf Hitler, a man who is relentlessly portrayed as the pinnacle of evil, could be so admired by the vast majority of Germans. Were they all brainwashed, bloodthirsty barbarians? Gotz Aly, a liberal German historian, had this to say:

The Third Reich was not a dictatorship maintained by force. Indeed, the Nazi leadership developed an almost fearful preoccupation with the mood of the populace, which they monitored carefully, devoting considerable energy and resources toward fulfilling consumer desires, even to the detriment of the country’s rearmament program.

To put the level of Nazi state coercion of its citizens into perspective: Communist East Germany would later employ 190,000 official surveillance experts and an equal number of “unofficial collaborators” to watch over a populace of 17 million, while the Gestapo in 1937 had just over 7,000 employees, including bureaucrats and secretarial staff.

After World War I, the leaders of 32 states convened in Paris to craft the Treaty of Versailles, though the proceedings were dominated by the United States, Britain, France and Italy (Germany was excluded entirely). Key advisers and representatives during the proceedings consisted of several prominent Jewish businessmen and politicians, among them Louis Rothschild, Interior Minister of France and adviser to Georges Clemenceau, Phillip Sassoon, adviser to British Prime Minister Lloyd George, and Bernard Baruch and Stephen Wise, both advisers to President Woodrow Wilson. U.S. banking interests were represented by Paul Warburg, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, while his brother, Max Warburg, represented a German banking firm.

Given the cast of characters, it should not be difficult to understand the agendas driving the Treaty of Versailles, which would ultimately cripple and loot Germany by virtually eliminating her military, destroying her economy and dividing up land and foreign assets among the victors. Though ultimately not responsible for the war, it was decided that Germany would be held solely responsible and ordered to pay approximately 226 billion marks in compensation, equivalent to roughly $800 billion U.S. dollars in 2013, 16 billion of which was to be paid to governments and private banks in the U.S., France and Britain. Although this figure was later reduced, it took until 2010 for Germany to pay off the debt. Germany is still paying off the debt for World War II.

Prior to the National Socialist revolution, Germany was in tatters in many ways. The Bolsheviks were undermining the government from within and spreading communist propaganda through the media outlets under their control. In the education sector, approximately 59% of Jewish children enjoyed a secondary education as opposed to only 8% of German children. Unemployment, crime and drugs as well as pornography, an industry controlled predominantly by Jews, all contributed to the degradation of German culture. Berlin became known as the sex capital of the world where virtually anything that could be fantasized could be had, for a price. Form an article in Veterans Today titled ‘The Sexual Decadence of Weimar Germany‘, Lasha Darkmoon writes:

The biggest step in the direction of the decline of the German cultural life [however] was taken in the field of the light entertainment genre. Here—in the genre of musical comedy and above all in revue and burlesque—frivolity and lasciviousness were to rear their ugly heads. So much so that during these years Berlin was quite correctly considered the most immoral city in the world.

It was Jews who introduced this pornographic “art form” to Germany, a debased genre completely unknown before the Great War, and so it is the Jews who can be held responsible for the general decline in morals.

The Jewish sexologists Ivan Bloch and Magnus Hirschfeld became the representatives of “sex research” camouflaged as science—a bogus science that was merely an excuse for pornography and propaganda designed to destroy the institute of marriage and the sanctity of the family.

And again in a later article titled ‘Secret Sex Life of the Jews‘, Darkmoon writes:

Of one thing we can be reasonably certain: any society that attracts large numbers of Jews can expect within a few years to enter a spiral of decadence. Moral anarchy sets in. Sexual promiscuity throws open its Pandora’s box of evils. We saw it in Weimar Germany.

We see it gathering pace in America today. We see it above all in Israel, a society of fanatical settlers and rabid right-wing rabbis: a country surely doomed to implode from within, sooner or later, under the pressure of its own moral and military excesses.

I cannot help feeling that a great storm is brewing and that only a military coup or revolution can now save America. Save it from what? From the spiritual cancer that is consuming it from within, and from the iniquitous wars into which it is being lured — Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and soon perhaps Iran—on behalf of a foreign nation and its disinfo agents in America.

Unless a miracle soon occurs and some charismatic leader comes to our rescue, an unimaginably bleak future surely awaits us: a future in which the only consolations left to us will be mindless entertainment, drugs, alcohol, sexual intoxication — and suicide.

In his book ‘Did Six Million Really Die?’, Richard Harwood writes about the German policy toward the Jews prior to World War II:

Rightly or wrongly, the Germany of Adolf Hitler considered the Jews to be a disloyal and avaricious element within the national community, as well as a force of decadence in Germany’s cultural life. This was held to be particularly unhealthy since, during the Weimar period, the Jews had risen to a position of remarkable strength and influence in the nation, particularly in law, finance and the mass media, even though they constituted only 5 per cent of the population. The fact that Karl Marx was a Jew and that Jews such as Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Liebknecht were disproportionately prominent in the leadership of revolutionary movements in Germany, also tended to convince the Nazis of the powerful internationalist and Communist tendencies of the Jewish people themselves. It is no part of the discussion here to argue whether the German attitude to the Jews was right or not, or to judge whether its legislative measures against them were just or unjust. Our concern is simply with the fact that, believing of the Jews as they did, the Nazis’ solution to the problem was to deprive them of their influence within the nation by various legislative acts, and most important of all, to encourage their emigration from the country altogether. By 1939, the great majority of German Jews had emigrated, all of them with a sizable proportion of their assets. Never at any time had the Nazi leadership even contemplated a policy of genocide towards them.

In a speech given before the Reichstag on 30 Jan., 1937, regarding the Jewish/communist threat to Germany, Adolf Hitler stated, in part:

The second division has been brought about by the proclamation of the Bolshevik doctrine, an integral feature of which is that they do not confine it to one nation but try to impose it on all the nations.

Here it is not a question of a special form of national life in Russia but of the Bolshevik demand for a world revolution. If Mr. Eden does not look at Bolshevism as we look at it, that may have something to do with the position of Great Britain and also with some happenings that are unknown to us. But I believe that nobody will question the sincerity of our opinions on this matter, for they are not based merely on abstract theory. For Mr. Eden Bolshevism is perhaps a thing which has its seat in Moscow, but for us in Germany this Bolshevism is a pestilence against which we have had to struggle at the cost of much bloodshed. It is a pestilence which tried to turn our country into the same kind of desert as is now the case in Spain; for the habit of murdering hostages began here, in the form in which we now see it in Spain. National Socialism did not try to come to grips with Bolshevism in Russia, but the Jewish international Bolsheviks in Moscow have tried to introduce their system into Germany and are still trying to do so. Against this attempt we have waged a bitter struggle, not only in defense of our own civilization but in defense of European civilization as a whole.

Judea Declares War on Germany
Judea Declares War on Germany – March 24, 1933

Into the vacuum created by the gutting of Germany by the Treaty of Versailles after the First World War stepped opportunistic Jewish bankers, businessmen and politicians who would ultimately hold the influential positions in Germany that Harwood speaks of. Meanwhile, an element of Jewry which included the Jewish leaders Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht worked on overthrowing the current regime in favor of a communist one which was not popular among the Germans, who resented the growing influence of this Jewish cabal. They would make their discontentment known at the voting booths and in 1933 Hitler would finally be appointed the Chancellor of Germany. Though the stranglehold of Jewish hegemony upon the country was broken as a result, Jewry would fight back politically by issuing the first declaration of war against Germany in the form of a world wide call to boycott German goods in order to drive its economy into the ground and “bring the German people to their senses”. Louis Marschalko later wrote:

“In losing Germany, Jewry lost a territory from which it exerted power. Therefore it was determined to re-conquer it.” — Louis Marschalko, “The World Conquerors: The Real War Criminals.”

Jewry’s declaration of war upon Germany appeared on the front page of the 24 Mar., 1933, edition of the London Daily Express in an article titled, ‘Judea Declares War On Germany: Jews Of All The World Unite in Action‘. It read, in part:

The Israelite people of the world declare an economic war on Germany. It is not sufficient that we should buy no goods made in Germany. We must refuse to deal with any shopkeeper who sells any German-made goods. What we are proposing is to bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends.

Further declarations of war by Jewish power brokers would soon follow in publications around the world:

“The Israeli people around the world declare economic and financial war against Germany. Fourteen million Jews stand together as one man, to declare war against Germany. The Jewish wholesaler will forsake his firm, the banker his stock exchange, the merchant his commerce and the pauper his pitiful shed in order to join together in a holy war against Hitler’s people.” — Daily Express, March 24, 1933.

“For months now the struggle against Germany is waged by each Jewish community, at each conference, in all our syndicates, and by each Jew all over the world. There is reason to believe that our part in this struggle has general value. We will trigger a spiritual and material war of all the world against Germany’s ambitions to become once again a great nation, to recover lost territories and colonies. But our Jewish interests demand the complete destruction of Germany. Collectively and individually, the German nation is a threat to us Jews.” — Vladimir Jabotinsky (founder of the Jewish terrorist group, Irgun Zvai Leumi) in Mascha Rjetsch, January, 1934

“Hitler will have no war (does not want war), but we will force it on him, not this year, but soon.” — Emil Ludwig Cohn in Les Annales, June, 1934

“The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish hegemony throughout the world.” – Brigadier General George Van Horn Mosely, The New York Tribune, March 29, 1939.

On 1 Apr., 1933, eight days after Jewry’s original declaration of war on Germany, Hitler responded in the form of an order to boycott Jewish businesses for a period of 24 hours. Because international Jewry had declared war upon Germany, the Jews residing within her boarders could be legally treated as an enemy of Germany, disarmed and subjected to internment (Hitler did not disarm all Germans as some believe). Harwood writes (emphasis added):


With the coming of the war, the situation regarding the Jews altered drastically. It is not widely known that world Jewry declared itself to be a belligerent party in the Second World War, and there was therefore ample basis under international law for the Germans to intern the Jewish population as a hostile force. On September 5, 1939 Chaim Weizmann, the principle Zionist leader, had declared war against Germany on behalf of the world’s Jews, stating that “the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies… The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources etc … ” (Jewish Chronicle, September 8, 1939).


All Jews had thus been declared agents willing to prosecute a war against the German Reich, and as a consequence, Himmler and Heydrich were eventually to begin the policy of internment. It is worth noting that the United States and Canada had already interned all Japanese aliens and citizens of Japanese descent in detention camps before the Germans applied the same security measures against the Jews of Europe. Moreover, there had been no such evidence or declaration of disloyalty by these Japanese Americans as had been given by Weizmann. The British, too, during the Boer War, interned all the women and children of the population, and thousands had died as a result, yet in no sense could the British be charged with wanting to exterminate the Boers. The detention of Jews in the occupied territories of Europe served two essential purposes from the German viewpoint. The first was to prevent unrest and subversion; Himmler had informed Mussolini on October 11th, 1942, that German policy towards the Jews had altered during wartime entirely for reasons of military security. He complained that thousands of Jews in the occupied regions were conducting partisan warfare, sabotage and espionage, a view confirmed by official Soviet information given to Raymond Arthur Davis that no less than 35,000 European Jews were waging partisan war under Tito in Yugoslavia. As a result, Jews were to be transported to restricted areas and detention camps, both in Germany, and especially after March 1942, in the Government- General of Poland. […]

Paul Rassinier, a prisoner at the Buchenwald and Dora concentration camps from 1943 until the end of the war, wrote:

Then one day I realized that a false picture of the German camps had been created and that the problem of the concentration camps was a universal one, not just one that could be disposed of by placing it on the doorstep of the National Socialists. The deportees — many of whom were Communists — had been largely responsible for leading international political thinking to such an erroneous conclusion. I suddenly felt that by remaining silent I was an accomplice to a dangerous influence.

12.  The Victim – How to hate yourself and influence people

“The [Nuremberg Trial was] the biggest legal farce in history… the legend about six million supposedly murdered Jews acquired a legal basis, even though the court did not have a single document signed by A. Hitler concerning the extermination of Jews…” — Rick Sanchez, former CNN correspondent, 2010

While many question what it is that Germany did to the Jews, few ask the far more significant question of what it is the Jews did to Germany. There has been a toxic element of Jewry at work for a very long time and this is well understood, even by many Jewish people. This criminal element of Jewry, which many identify with Zionism, is more influential today than it was prior to the Second World War.

While the German distrust of the Jews clearly had a racist element to it, it is important to understand that the distrust of the Jews that existed in Germany was by no means unique as the Jews had been kicked out of approximately 80 countries prior to 1938 including Austria, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Portugal, Prague, Russia, Spain, Switzerland and the Ukraine, and sometimes more than once.

The so-called racist Nazis had possibly the only military at that time that did not segregate based on color, unlike the United States. Those that made up the Waffen Schutzstaffel — the Waffen SS — were primarily volunteers from approximately 30 countries. This fact is conveniently overlooked by the brain-dead Skin Heads, white supremacists and many modern day Nazis.

Hitler’s “Final Solution” to what the Germans saw as a Jewish problem was not a policy of extermination, but a policy of expulsion which was carried out in part by an agreement to transfer 50,000 Jews and their assets to Palestine. In an article about the book ‘The Transfer Agreement’ by Edwin Black that appeared in Veterans Today titled ‘Truth Telling Transfer Agreement Exposes Hitler as Father of Israel‘ we read:

This truth threatens to destabilize modern Zionism’s stranglehold on the mainstream media propaganda that, in 2011, continues to suffocate U.S. Citizens and the world with “guilt” appeals and billions of US taxpayer “aid” dollars given each year to a state that neither has the best interest of the American people nor the best interests of it’s own indigenous populations that the Zionist so-called democracy claims to represent.

While most people today would not consider the mass expulsion of the Jews from Germany to be ethical, myself included, it nevertheless must be put into perspective, accounting for the period of time in which these events occurred and during which blacks were still being lynched in the U.S.. While one can call it persecution, and personally i would not argue the validity of the term, there was obviously compelling reasons why nobody wanted the Jews and this must be considered. As Ernst Zundel said, “there is no antisemitism without Semitism”. Richard Harwood wrote in his book ‘Did Six Million Really Die?’:

Buchenwald missing man forgery
This forged photograph from Buchenwald (top) is often used to represent the holocaust. Even Wikipedia uses the forged version. The original (bottom) appeared in the May 6th, 1945 edition of The New York Times Magazine (click to enlarge).

It is very significant, however, that certain Jews were quick to interpret these policies of internal discrimination as equivalent to extermination itself. A 1936 anti-German propaganda book by Leon Feuchtwanger and others entitled Der Gelbe Fleck: Die Austrotung von 500,000 deutschen Juden (The Yellow Spot: The Extermination of 500,000 German Jews, Paris, 1936), presents a typical example. Despite its baselessness in fact, the annihilation of the Jews is discussed from the first pages – straightforward emigration being regarded as the physical “extermination” of German Jewry.

Earlier i quoted part of a writing by Jewish Rabbi Michael Dov Weissmandl from his memoir, however it is the latter part of this same piece which is most important as it is our first indication that Zionist Jews holding key positions in Palestine had no intention of helping the European Jews for reasons we shall soon discover:

And you – our brothers in Palestine, in all the countries of freedom, and you, ministers of all the kingdom – how do you keep silent in the face of this great murder? Silent while thousand on thousands, reaching now to six million Jews, were murdered. And silent now while tens of thousands are still being murdered and waiting to be murdered? Their destroyed hearts cry to you for help as they bewail your cruelty. Brutal you are and murderers too you are, because of the cold-bloodedness of the silence in which you watch.

Because you sit with folded arms and you do nothing, though you could stop or delay the murder of Jews at this very hour. In the name of the blood of the thousands on thousands who have been murdered we beg, we plead, we cry out and demand that you take action, that you do deeds now – at once!

That the Ministers of Kingdoms and all the Lands raise a loud and piercing outcry that must enter the ears of the world, the ears of the German people, the ears of the Hungarian people. Let them cry out a warning to the German murderers. Let them proclaim that they know all that has been done in the past, and that which is still being done. And the Pope, himself, should join in this cry of outrage against the German murderers.

Altered photograph to blame Nazi's
The forged photograph (top) was altered by the Soviets (click to enlarge).

Let this outcry be heard over all the radios and read in all the newspapers of the world, that unless they stop at once the deportations of Hungary’s Jews – then will Germany be forever exiled from civilization.

We ask that the crematoria in Auschwitz be bombed from the air. They are sharply visible, as shown on the enclosed map.

Such bombing will delay the work of the German murderers.

What is more important – to bomb persistently all the roads leading from Eastern Hungary to Poland and to bomb persistently the bridges in the neighborhood of Karpatarus. Drop all other business to get this done. Remember that one day of your idleness kills twelve thousand souls.

You, our brothers, sons of Israel, are you insane? Don’t you know the Hell around us? For whom are you saving your money?

How is it that all our pleadings affect you less than the whimpering of a beggar standing in your doorway? Murderers! Madmen! Who is it that gives charity? You who toss a few pennies from your safe homes? Or we who give our blood in the depths of Hell?

There is only one thing that may be said in your exoneration – that you do not know the truth. This is possible. The villain does his job so shrewdly that only a few guess the truth. We have told you the truth several times. Is it possible that you believe our murderers more than you believe us? May God open your eyes and give you heart to rescue in these last hours the remainder.

Soviet-Nazi Tank Hanging Forgery
The forged photograph (top) was altered by the Soviets (click to enlarge).

Most important is that which I write about the bombing of the Auschwitz Crematoria and the bridges leading to them.

Such bombing can vitally delay the evil work of our slaughterers. And God who keeps alive the last remnant of Israel will show His mercy for which I pray. I pray as I write out of the sea of tears of the people of Israel. We wait God’s help.

One from the Market who witnesses the woes of his people

In response to pleas of help from the Jewish Rescue Committee regarding the European Jews, Menachem Bader of the Jewish Agency, who had received numerous letters like the one above from Weissmandl, wrote (emphasis added):

We are writing to remind you of the one factor of which you must never lose sight: that ultimately, the Allies will win the war. After their victory, territorial boundaries will be reshaped as they were after the First World War. Then, the way will be clear for our purpose at this time, with the war drawing to a close, we must do everything in our power to change Eretz Yisrael to Medinat Yisrael and many steps have already been taken in this regard. Therefore, we must turn a deaf ear to the pleas and cries emanating from Eastern Europe. Remember this: all the allies have suffered many losses, and if we also do not offer human sacrifices, how can we gain the right to sit at the conference table when the territorial boundaries are reshaped? Accordingly, it is foolhardy and brazen for us to negotiate in terms of money or supplies in exchange for Jewish lives. How dare we ask of the allied powers to barter money for lives while they are sustaining heavy casualties daily? So, insofar as the masses are concerned: RAK B’DAM TIHJE LANU HAAREZ, [Eretz Yisroel will be ours only by paying with blood], but as far as our immediate circle is concerned, ATEM TAJLU [you escape]. The messenger bearing this letter will supply you with funds for this purpose.

In response to the sentiments of Weissmandl, Rabbi Moshe Shonfeld wrote:

When they asked me, couldn’t you give money out of the United Jewish Appeal funds for the rescue of Jews in Europe, I said, ‘NO!’ and I say again ‘NO!’ … one should resist this wave which pushes the Zionist activities to secondary importance.

Obviously one of the primary goals of the Zionists at the time was to secure a homeland in Palestine, but this was not a goal they could accomplish on their own and therefore they would ensure that the U.S. would be dragged into the war. A similar agreement was made during in the First World War when the Zionists had promised Britain, who in 1916 was losing the war because it was unable to defeat Germany alone, that the U.S. could be convinced to support them if the they were to guarantee that, after defeating Germany, Austria Hungary and Turkey, land would be provided for the Zionists in Palestine.

After the war it was the World Jewish Congress who helped setup the show trials at Nuremberg, thus strengthening the Zionist position by insuring that the world would hate the Germans for decades to come and forever associate the Swastika, a symbol of anti-communism, with the murder of 6 million Jews.

USS Liberty - Post Israeli Attack
The USS Liberty, heavily damaged and listing after the attack by the Israeli military (click to enlarge)

During Israels 1967 war with several Arab nations, Israeli fighter planes and naval vessels viciously attacked the USS Liberty, a United States Navy vessel which was used to gather intelligence at the time. 34 crew members were killed and nearly 200 injured. Witnesses reported that the Israeli military dropped napalm on the deck and machine-gunned the lifeboats. In the aftermath it appears obvious that Israels intention was to blame the attack on the Egyptians in order to persuade the U.S. to support them in the 6 Day War.

Even today, some Jewish people continue to seek sympathy and secure the victim-hood status of Israel and the Jews, often by perpetrating what one might call mini-false flag events where they attack themselves and then blame the incident on innocent people or organizations. Such “attacks” are often given wide media attention, especially among the Jewish controlled media companies. Following are a small number of examples of Jewish false-flag events:

The Baltimore Sun, 9-Oct., 2008:

3 charged in Pikesville vandalism

A 19-year-old member of Baltimore Hebrew Congregation was being held yesterday after being charged in connection with the spray-painting of a swastika and the word “Nazis” at the synagogue in Pikesville.

Matthew Ian Saunders, whose family worships at the temple, and two other young Jewish men – Daniel Alexander Diaz, 19, and a 17-year-old who was not identified by police – were charged with two counts of destruction of property and damaging the property of a religious entity.

Haaretz, 1-Sep., 2013:

French Jews stunned by claims that rabbi faked own stabbing

The French Jewish community is in an uproar over allegations that Reform Rabbi Gabriel Farhi, who was stabbed on January 3, may in fact have faked the stabbing.

The allegations surfaced in a report this week by the weekly magazine Marianne, which was then picked up by Le Figaro. The journal reported that police officers investigating the stabbing said it is not clear whether Farhi was actually stabbed by an unknown assailant, and they are not ruling out the possibility that Farhi in fact stabbed himself.

The report stunned French Jewry, which for the past two years has been vociferously protesting law enforcement agencies’ failure to take effective action against the hundreds of anti-Semitic attacks the community has suffered.

BBC, 13-Jul., 2004

‘Swastika attack’ woman detained

The 23-year-old woman said six men cut her clothes and drew swastikas on her body, assuming that she was Jewish.

Police say there are trying to clarify some inaccuracies in the account of the woman who has not been named.

According to French media reports – citing unnamed police sources – the woman subsequently admitted having made the story up.

The case has sparked widespread condemnation amid concern that racist and anti-Semitic attacks are on the rise in France., 16-Dec., 2004

Former Prof Gets Prison For Faking Anti-Semitic Hate Crime

LOS ANGELES — A former Claremont McKenna College visiting professor, who spray-painted her car with racist and anti-Semitic slurs and then reported a hate crime on campus, was sentenced today to a year in state prison.

Pomona Superior Court Judge Charles Horan said Kerri Dunn “terrorized” minority students at the college and turned the rest of the students into suspects, adding that her actions could have sparked major racial violence.

BBC, 30-Aug., 2004

Jewish man held over Paris fire

Police in Paris have arrested a man in connection with a fire at a Jewish community centre that was initially assumed to be an anti-Semitic attack.

French media report that the suspect is a Jewish man who worked there.

The centre was daubed with swastikas and set alight a week ago, prompting renewed pledges by French authorities to defeat anti-Semitism and racism.

In July, a French woman falsely claimed she had been the victim of vicious anti-Semitic assault.

13.  The Iron Grip – Jewish influence throughout the world today

“There is only one power which really counts. The power of political pressure. We Jews are the most powerful people on earth, because we have this power, and we know how to apply it.” — Vladimir Jabotinsky, Jewish Daily Bulletin, July 27, 1935

With a subject as vast as the holocaust it is expected that many errors will be made and events exaggerated, invented, or omitted, however if lies have been fabricated which have a significant impact on the historical record, or were engineered specifically to alter the historical record in order to manipulate policy, then the truth must follow before the resulting problems can be corrected.

There can be no argument that the holocaust, a term which was applied to World War II 16 years after its end, has been used by a segment of Jewry and Israel to alter the course of history, deny freedom of speech, manipulate government policy, change the public perception of Israela state gone utterly madextort billions from generations of Germans who had nothing to do with the Second World War and slaughter thousands of Palestinians and steal their land in the holocaust it has inflicted upon them.

I bought in to the official version of the holocaust for most of my life because that was the only version we had been given through schooling and the mass media — institutions i was taught to trust. What they failed to teach us however is that history is written by the winners and one of the primary beneficiaries of the false history we have been given is Israel. The Zionists, having acquired what they set out to do, would not be able to play the holocaust card at every opportunity that benefits them had the Germans not been defeated. This ill-gotten sympathy has been and continues to be used to extort trillions of dollars and weapons which Israel then uses to kill Arabs, as well as by the Jewish power brokers to maintain their influential positions in international banking, business, the media and government:

It seems no avenue for the dissemination of propaganda is left untouched by the Zionists, even Wikipedia:

Barry Soetoro (Barack Obama) at the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem
Barry Soetoro (Barack Obama) at the ‘Wailing Wall’ in Jerusalem (click to enlarge)

The U.S. is another beneficiary of this falsified history because it uses Israel as a proxy to further its own genocidal and geopolitical agendas in the middle east, though U.S. foreign policy seems to be driven largely by the disproportionate Jewish influence in the U.S. government, the president of which has no hope of becoming president without the blessings of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and other Jewish institutions. One need only understand who owns the media and who sits on their boards to understand how this powerful machine can keep grinding forward, destroying all who lie in its path, with meager resistance from its victims who fear being struck by bolts of lightening emanating from the ever present cloud of ‘antisemitism’. The iron grip of this criminal element of Jewry upon the worlds institutions, which ultimately dictates policy, must be broken not because they are Jewish, but because they are criminals. This very same criminal cabal, though certainly not exclusive, is an integral part of what the revolutionary movements of today call “the 1%“.

Hitlers mistake in trying to rid his country of this Jewish criminal element, and restore prosperity and dignity to the German people, was underestimating the power and influence they held in the nations they would convince to declare war upon a Germany who never wanted it.

14.  The Irony – The Palestinian holocaust that no one talks about

“The killing by a Jew of a non-Jew, i.e. a Palestinian, is considered essentially a good deed, and Jews should therefore have no compunction about it.” — Yitzhak Ginsburg, “Five General Religious Duties Which Lie Behind the Act of the Saintly, Late Rabbi Baruch Goldstein, May his Blood be Avenged”

Israeli gifts to Palestine
Israeli gifts to Palestine (click to enlarge)

I think this one image reveals a great deal about the arrogance of Israel and how the ignorance, hatred and brainwashing of the Israeli people at the behest of their Zionist leadership is passed down to their children, one shown here writing messages on weapons of mass destruction destined for Gaza during Operation Cast Lead, some of which will kill and maim children there.

Prior to 1929, the Jews lived in relative harmony with the Arabs in Palestine, socializing and even babysitting each others children. The relationship seems to have deteriorated after 1929 when large numbers of Jews began migrating to Palestine, just over 4000 in 1931 and nearly 70,000 in 1935, and a takeover of the land by the Zionists became apparent. Peace between the two has been fleeting since 1948 and the conflict, largely funded and condoned by the United States, is a primary source of world tensions and instability today.

Israeli Soldiers Use Rocks to Break the Bones of Palestinians

Israeli Settlers

Israeli War Crimes in Gaza

15.  The Timeline – The holocaust calendar

“It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong.” — François-Marie Arouet (Voltaire)

The following timeline of holocaust related events was sourced from the Holocaust Calendar document on The Holocaust Historiography Project website.

01/27/forever: International Day of Commemoration in memory of the victims of the Holocaust. Careful: If you don’t commemorate, you could be deported to a foreign country and locked up for the rest of your life. Just ask thought criminals Ernst Zündel, Germar Rudolf, and David Irving.

02/08/1920: The Illustrated Sunday Herald publishes a full-page article by Winston Churchill’ entitled, “Zionism versus Bolshevism: A struggle for the soul of the Jewish people.”

03/24/1933: The headline story of the London Daily Express reads, Judea Declares War on Germany. The article goes on to proclaim, “Jews of all the world unit. Boycott of German goods. Mass demonstrations.”

11/09/1938: Kristallnacht (Crystal Night). The sole incident of anti-Jewish rioting during the Third Reich. An isolated event that has somehow gained much more attention than the widespread desecration and destruction of Christian churches throughout Soviet Russia and its various satellites during and after the Communist revolution, or the frequent attacks on Catholic churches in Spain (not merely during the 1936-1939 civil war but during the days of the leftist Spanish Republic in the years before its overthrow). Because Kristallnach rioting was triggered by the murder of a German diplomat (Ernst vom Rath), one might also recall that it was the wounding of Israeli ambassador (to Great Britain) Shlomo Argov that served as the pretext for Israel’s massive 1982 invasion and occupation of Lebanon, during which thousands of Arab civilians were slaughtered in savage Israeli artillery and aerial attacks. Israel’s murderous invasion was crowned by the massacres at Sabra and Shatila, Palestinian refugee camps into which Israeli troops admitted henchmen drawn from the allegedly Christian Lebanese, and then sat back as more than a thousand Palestinian men, women, and children were slaughtered. Vom Rath’s assassin, 17-year-old Pole Hershl Grynszpan, eventually fell into German hands and survived the war.

05/10/1941: Rudolf Hess flies to Great Britain as an ambassador of peace, is captured, and is locked away in prison until the day he dies.

03/19/1942: FDR signs Executive Order No. 9012 establishing the War Relocation Authority, which soon starts to operate the internment camps for American citizens of Japanese descent, some of whom were born in America, even though none of whom is charged with any crime. Note that in America, citizens were being herded into camps based on race before the Nazis herded Jews (who were not citizens of Germany and were in fact enemy aliens) into concentration camps based on race alone. The U.S. Congress and Supreme Court uphold these actions.

08/12/1942: Rudolf Hoess issues a special order concerning the use of the disinfectant Zyklon B, which reads: “A case of indisposition with slight symptoms of poisoning by hydrocyanic gas which occurred today makes it necessary to warn all those participating in the gassings and all other SS members that in particular on opening rooms used for gassing SS not wearing masks must wait at least five hours and keep at a distance of at least 15 meters from the chamber. In addition, particular attention should be paid to the wind direction. — The gas being used at present contains less odorous warning agent and is therefore especially dangerous. — The SS garrison doctor declines all responsibility for any accidenthat should occur in the case where these directive have not been complied with by the SS members.” Apparently, Hoess felt moved to issue this warning after seeing the sonderkommando entering the “gas chambers” within moments of an “execution,” eating and smoking, as has been testified to by so-called “eyewitnesses.”

02/28/1944: H. Hewett, assistant secretary for the British Ministry of Information states in a letter that “(w)e cannot reform the Bolsheviks but we can do our best to save them – and ourselves – from the consequences of their acts. The disclosures (of Soviet genocide) of the past quarter century will render more denials unconvincing. The only alternative to denial is to distract public attention from the whole subject. Experience has shown that the best distraction is atrocity propaganda directed against the enemy … your cooperation is therefore earnestly sought to distract public attention from the doings of the Red Army by your whole-hearted support of various charges against the Germans and Japanese which have been and will be put into circulation by the Ministry.”

08/24/1944: Soviet secret police (NKVD) are alleged to have murdered 600 Polish soldiers and officers in the forests of Trzebuska, not far from Rzeszow. Suppressed documentation reveals that the mass graves of Trzebuska were discovered in 1980, but were again suppressed by the Polish government to protect its ally.

04/26/1945: The date SS officer Kurt Gerstein’s first two (of at least six) “confessions.” Confession 1 is handwritten in French. Confession 2 is typewritten in French, dated April 26, 1945 (also presented as Nuernberg document PS-1553; rejected by the IMT but accepted by the AMT!). Confession 3 is typewritten in German and is dated May 4, 1945. Confession 4 is handwritten in French, dated May 6, 1945. Confession 5 is typewritten in French, dated May 6, 1945. And Confession 6 is typewritten in German, dated May 6, 1945. Also, there are three distinct versions of Confession 5.

01/30/1946: When the “confession” of Kurt Gerstein is offered as evidence at the war crimes trials at Nuernberg, it is judged to be so obviously phony that it is rejected, and not permitted to be read before the court. Even kangaroo courts have standards to maintain! In later trials, this same document is admitted as evidence by judges and prosecutors desperate for anything that will help them hang their virtually defenseless victims.

06/21/1946: While questioning defendant Albert Speer at the Nuernberg trials, US prosecutor Robert Jackson tells Speer that he has certain information that the Nazis erected a small village just outside of Auschwitz, put approximately 20,000 Jews in it, and by means of a newly invented weapon eradicated these people almost instantaneously in such a way that there was no trace left of them, and that the explosive used had developed temperatures of from 400 to 500 degrees Centigrade. Jackson: “Do you know about that experiment?” Speer: “No, and I consider it utterly improbable.” Jackson then dropped the matter, which is too bad because this story is much more easily defended than the current “gas chamber” myth.

10/06/1946: Senator Bob Taft (R-Ohio) speaks out against the Nuernberg War Crimes Trials, and throws away his and the Republican party’s chances for the presidency in the upcoming elections.

04/29/1979: Elie Wiesel, writing in Jewish Week, states, “The Holocaust is our strength. We have been shielded by it for a generation.”

08/15/1979: A bomb demolishes the car of Tscherim Soobzokov. Soobzokov had been falsely accused of “war crimes” during WWII, but had been completely exonerated by two Federal courts of all accusations. The bombing came days after Mordechai Levy of the Jewish Defense Organization denounced Soobzokov and threated his life in a fiery speech at a New Jersey synagogue. On opening the front door of his house to investigate, Soobzokov set off another bomb that had been rigged to his door. Soobzokov, his wife, daughter, and four-year-old grandchild were injured in the blast. Soobzokov underwent nine hours of emergency surgery and his leg had to be amputated. Morchechai Levy told reporters, “The only thing I regret is that instead of losing his legs, he should have lost his life.” On September 6, Soobzokov succumbed to his injuries.

08/30/1979: First International Revisionist Conference, Northrup University, Los Angeles, California. An award of $50,000 is announced for anyone who can prove the Nazis used homicidal gas chambers.

09/06/1979: Tscherim Soobzokov dies of injuries received from a bomb rigged to the front door of his house. Soobzokov had previously been falsely accused of “war crimes” during WWII, but had been completely exonerated in two Federal courts. Morechai Levy, of the Jewish Defense Organization, applauded the terrorists who attacked this innocent man and his family.

11/02/1979: Gitta Sereny in the New Statesman admits that “Auschwitz was not primarily an extermination camp” and that “there have been books or films which were only partly true, or even were partly faked.” Sereny further admits being approached to ghost-write Martin Gray’s For Those I Loved.

11/16/1979: The British Jewish Chronicle calls for the restriction of certain library books (read: revisionist literature) to “reference” only.

07/31/1980: After almost a year, no one steps forward to claim the $50,000 prize offered by the IHR to anyone who can prove the Nazis used homicidal gas chambers.

08/01/1980: Second International Revisionist Conference, Ontario, California. Announced at this conference are two contests, each for $25,000 to anyone who can either prove the diary of Anne Frank is genuine or that the Nazis ever made soap from the bodies of Jews.

08/11/1980: David Alexander, president of Pomona College in California (the site of the 1980 Revisionist Conference) writes in a letter to the Institute for Historical Review that “because of the College’s commitment to open and free inquiry Pomona College will not be able to offer the use of its facilities in the future.”

09/29/1980: In an Exterminationist symposium in Jerusalem, Professor Franklin H. Littell states, “You can’t discuss the truth of the Holocaust. That’s a distortion of freedom of speech. The U.S. should emulate West Germany, which outlaws such public exercises. We now have to deal with a minimum of violence; later we’ll have to fight them in the streets.” Ignoring Professor Littell’s stand on the First Amendment, can you imagine the furor if a revisionist had called for fighting anti-revisionists in the streets? (see the Jerusalem Post, International Edition, October 19-25, 1980).

10/09/1980: An article in the New York Post entitled, Anne Frank May Not Have Inked That Famous Diary, reports on disclosures made in the German news weekly Der Spiegel to the effect that “A report by the German Federal Criminal Investigation Bureau (BKA) indicates that portions of the diary had been altered or added after 1951, casting doubt over the authenticity of the entire work.” The 1951 date is significant because that is the year of the introduction of the ball-point pen, ink from which was used in portions of the diary.

10/25/1980: The Los Angeles Times prints an article in which it attempts to establish that Revisionism leads to “anti-Semitism,” which in turn has lead to the recent bombings in Europe.

11/30/1980: The home of Dr. Reinhard Buchner (a member of the Institute of Historical Review’s Editorial Advisory Committee) is beseiged by a mob of zealots affiliated with the Jewish Defense League calling for his death. Members of the mob admit to the Los Angeles Herald-Examiner that it was they who harangued and spit on Buchner some months earlier.

12/17/1980: In an interview on French radio, Professor Robert Faurisson calls the existence of Nazi gas chambers and the massacre of millions of Jews during WWII “historic lies.” For his trouble, Faurisson is hauled into court and convicted of “inciting hatred and racial discrimination.”

12/18/1980: Mel Mermelstein submits his claim to the IHR that he can prove there were homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz.

12/20/1980: The Los Angeles Herald-Examiner prints a letter from David McCalden (Director of the Institute for Historical Review) rebutting an inaccurate article about Dr. Reinhard Buchner (a member of the Editorial Advisory Committee of the IHR).

12/26/1980: The Jewish Press attempts to explain away Professor Noam Chomsky’s support for Holocaust revisionists by deciding Chomsky suffers from self hate.

01/08/1981: Simon Wiesenthal, in a letter to the Institute for Historical Review, claims to have proof of the existence of Nazi gas chambers that will win him $50,000, and proof of the authenticity of the Anne Frank “diary” that will win him $25,000. Unfortunately, Wiesenthal subsequently failed to provide this proof, and had to forego the prize money.

01/08/1981: The Chicago Jewish Sentinel reports that there is now a Survivors’ Registry for those former concentration camp inmates “who are prepared to disclose their personal stories to serious media artists working on Holocaust themes.” There’s no business like Shoah business.

02/01/1981: Telford Taylor, Chief Prosecutor at the NMT Nuremberg Trials, reveals during a book review that despite his own role in wartime Army Intelligence, “I had no awareness of the ‘Final Solution’ until after the War, and inquiry among my associates of those times — not a few of them Jewish — has disclosed very few who were more sensitive or perceptive than I in this respect It was known that many of the atrocity stories of World War I, especially those involving the German occupation of Belgium, had proved unfounded and were either deliberate fabrications or the natural product of the wartime rumor mill. There was a general awareness that propaganda was a weapon of war, and this spread a skepticism, in large part justified, that robbed official accounts of much of their credibility.”

02/04/1981: PBS airs the British film, Kitty: Return to Auschwitz, in which Holocaust “survivor” Kitty Hart so fails to be convincing that even her own son can manage no more than a faintly bemused expression while listening to her delusional ramblings.

02/28/1981: Professor Noam Chomsky sets for his support for the academic freedom of Holocaust revisionist Professor Robert Faurisson in an article in the Nation.

03/04/1981: West German authorities kick down doors and ransack 2,000 homes in search of … books! Did these books urge violence? Did they contain state secrets? Were they libelous or scandalous? No, they merely presented a different view of the Holocaust myth, and for that reason had to be confiscated. The source of the books, Canadian Ernst Zündel, was charged for dissemination of “hate propaganda.” In August of 1982, the District Court of Stuttgart ruled that Zuendel was completely innocent of the accusations, and ordered the state treasury to pay all court costs.

03/30/1981: Joseph Brewda writing in New Solidarity cites a memorandum from the International Caucus of Labor Committees (to Secretary of State Alexander Haig) that accuses Nazi-hunter Simon Wiesenthal of being a Nazi collaborator during WWII.

04/10/1981: The Jewish Journal confirms Simon Wiesenthal’s dedication to freedom of speech by noting that Wiesenthal has “urged that the US adopt legislation against racial hatred.”

04/30/1981: The editorial page of the Los Angeles Times contains a piece by Rachel Patron, who claims that as a Polish Jew she was shipped off to Siberia by the Soviets during WWII (and you thought all Polish Jews were captured and gassed by Nazis). Ms. Patron goes on to state that on later passing through Ukraine on her return to Poland she found a shed full of soap made from Jews. Isn’t it interesting how these Holocaust survivors can remember seeing things that never existed?

05/16/1981: Deborah Lipstadt, a teacher of Modern Jewish History at UCLA, publishes an elaborate rebuttal to the Jewish soap stories in the Los Angeles Times. Having said that, however, Ms. Lipstadt then goes on to repeat the lies that 6 million Jews died at the hands of the Nazis during WWII, and that the Nazis made lampshades from human skin. Proof, Ms. Lipstadt?

05/31/1981: After weeks of rabble-rousing in the Canadian Jewish News (and other periodicals), an anti-German rally takes place at Allen Gardens (Canada). During the rally, speaker after speaker publically denounce and slander a Canadian citizen of German descent and others. The assembled multitude then walk to the business of a local German-Canadian and attempt to break through police lines to attack those inside. Neither the rally organizers, speakers, or attendees are censured for these acts. (In contrast, imagine what would have happened had Germans held a similar demonstration about Jews!)

06/25/1981: IHR headquarters in Torrance is bombed at 5 am. Claiming responsibility for the bombing is a man who called the Associated Press and identified himself as being a member of the Jewish Defenders, an arm of the violence-prone Jewish Defense League headed locally by Mordecai Levy and nationally by Irv Rubin.

07/20/1981: The SPOTLIGHT announces that more than 100,000 copies of the German language edition of its special Holocaust supplement, The Great Holocaust Debate, has been circulated in the Federal Republic of Germany, even though such distribution is illegal due to German laws against “denying” the Holocaust.

09/09/1981: Mordecai Levy of the Jewish Defense League is arraigned in Los Angeles federal count on charges of firebombing a Nigerian diplomat’s car in New York City. Apparently, Levi was attempting to firebomb members of the Soviet delegation but missed. A week earlier, Levy had been arrested for physically assaulting — in a courtroom — a 77-year-old Latvian native.

09/14/1981: The New York Post reports that 54 Jews are undergoingtwo weeks of training in upstate New York from “Israeli Commandos and US Army Special Forces soldiers” who teach them weapons handling, international politics, the Old Testament, and techniques of guerilla warfare.

10/09/1981: Judge Thomas Johnson of the Superior Court of California hands down a partial decision on the case of Mermelstein vs. the IHR, taking “judicial notice” of the fact that Jews were gassed at Auschwitz in 1944.

11/20/1981: The Third International Revisionist Conference, Los Angeles, California. At this conference it is announced that no one stepped forward with proof to claim either of the two $25,000 prizes — one of which would have gone to anyone who could proof the authenticity of the Anne Frank diary and the other to anyone who could prove that the Nazis ever made soap from the bodies of Jews.

02/01/1982: Gary Hughes in the Adelaide Advertiser recounts the story of a brother and sister, reunited after 39 years, who had each thought the other to have been murdered in Nazi “gas chambers.”

02/08/1982: The Ukrainian Catholic Daily lashes out at the US Justice Department’s Office of Special Investigations for using Soviet-supplied evidence, collaborating with the KGB, and using the mass media to attack Eastern European ethnic communities.

02/13/1982: The Weekend Australian quotes Rabbi Marvin Hier of the Simon Wiesenthal Center as saying that the Institute for Historical Review has “disintegrated.” Either this is another blatant lie, or Rabbi Hier is unaware that the SWC has 20 paid subscriptions to the Journal of Historical Review, which is published by the IHR, or that the SWC continues to order books from the IHR from time to time.

02/18/1982: The Canadian Jewish News reports that Jewish students at the University of Toronto are attempting to have revisionist works reclassified as fiction in order to have them shelved away from the “true” Holocaust books.

02/19/1982: The German weekly newspaper Die Zeit warns that historical revisionism must be taken serious, lest an Orwellian situation come to pass as in the novel 1984. Apparently, Die Zeit is unaware that in George Orwell’s 1984 the threat came from central powers controlling the thoughts of the individual, not from individuals displaying unorthodox thinking. The paper does concede, however, that a few of the better-known Holocaust stories may have been without foundation after all, but that doesn’t change a thing.

02/19/1982: The Los Angeles Times reports that David Shimtob, once a Jewish Defense League member, has been rearrested on various burglary, assault, and homicide charges in connection with a vicious group of paramilitary thugs that had been committing armed robberies of residences.

02/19/1982: The Toronto Globe and Mail reports that the ADL is planning to ask the Library of Congress reclassify revisionist books as fiction. Says the League’s executive director Alan Shefman, “We don’t want this to be seen as book-banning, because we’re very much opposed to censorship.” That is, he wants the books banned, but he doesn’t want it to appear as if they are being banned.

03/30/1982: The Los Angeles Times reports that Dr. George Ashley is transferred from his teaching post at North Hollywood high school for answering a student’s question about the “other side” of the Holocaust. The ADL is aghast that Ashley is not fired, and LA school board member Roberta Weintraub laments the protection afforded Ashley by the First Amendment.

04/01/1982: The Institute for Historical Review offers a $50,000 reward “to any person who can prove that gas chambers existed at or in Auschwitz Concentration Camp during World War II.” Three people respond, none with evidence that can meet the standards set forth in the Federal Rules of Evidence of the United States. Among those not responding: Allan Ryan, Lily Maier, Simon Wiesenthal, the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the St. Louise Center for Holocaust Studies, the Center for Holocaust Studies of Brooklyn, the Yad Vashem Museum and Library, Dr. Gisella Perl, Nathan Perlmutter, Lucy Dawidowicz, and Mel Mermelstein.

04/10/1982: Senator William Proxmire’s weak-kneed screed against the IHR is reported in the Congressional Record.

04/17/1982: Dr. Arthur Butz (author of The Hoax of the Twentieth Century) and William Lindsey, Ph.D. hold a seminar on key aspects of the Holocaust in Chicago.

04/19/1982: WW II American airman Paul Stralka shares details of his stay at Buchenwald for the Duluth News Tribune by recalling “long lines of prisoners being led to the gas chambers, which were usually disguised as showers.” Unfortunately, Buchenwald is in Germany, and as we all know, “there were no extermination camps on German soil” (Simon Wiesenthal, Books and Bookmen, April, 1975).

05/10/1982: At the United Jewish Welfare Fund Toy Division dinner, a man named Fred Kort was given the UJWF’s Humanitarian of the Year award. Kort is identified as a “survivor of the concentration camp at Treblinka.” One problem: on page 284 of the book The Death Camp Treblinka: A Documentary, only 69 people are listed as surviving Treblinka, and Fred Kort’s name is not among them. (Los Angeles Jewish Community Bulletin)

05/28/1982: The famed “ghetto boy” of Warsaw, photographed with his arms raised over his head as he was allegedly being hustled off to join the other Jews inside the gas ovens, has apparently surfaced in Rockland County, New York. Dr. Tsvi C. Nussbaum claims the picture is of him as a young boy. Some groups, who cherish the symbolism of the photo, refuse to believe Nussbaum’s claims. Of course, Nussbaum is not the first to claim himself as the subject of this photo; in 1978 wealthy Londoner Israel Rondel came forward to explain that the photo had been taken of Rondel after an arrest for theft, although he was later released unharmed and returned to his mother.

09/04/1982: The Fourth International Revisionist Conference, Chicago, Illinois.

11/17/1982: An Associated Press report by Ken Kusmer in the Los Angeles Daily News carries the astonishing news that Holocaust survivor Siegfried Halbreich saw Dr. Josef Mengele playing piano in a Los Angeles area restaurant in 1980, a year after Mengele’s death. Halbreich is quoted as saying, “I could not be wrong in recognizing Mengele.” Halbreich claims to have met Mengele six or seven times while Halbreich was detained at the Auschwitz concentration camp.

03/18/1983: The perpetrator of a campaign of virulent anti-Semitic graffiti, harassment, and death threats in Geneva, Switzerland, turns out to be 23-year-old Jewish medical student Phlip Gotchel. We can only surmize that Gotchel was unable to locate a suitable Nazi (American Jewish World).

04/12/1983: A Reuters story, dateline Bonn, reports that Rabbi Abraham Cooper of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles has urged Mayor Henning Yoscherau of Hamburg, Germany, to block construction of a shopping mall on a former Jewish cemetery after a German court gave the go-ahead to start building. Wrote Rabbi Cooper, “Considering the trauma and tragedy inflicted on the Jewish citizens of your city during the Holocaust, we would hope that the leaders of today’s Hamburg would take a stand on behalf of memory.”

04/13/1983: The Toronto Star recounts the story of Frank Walus, who was fingered by Simon Wiesenthal first as a Gestapo collaborator, then later as a member of the Gestapo. Twelve eyewitnesses swore Walus was a mass-murderer who had stomped a pregnant Jew to death. Forty eyewitnesses placed Walus at the concentration camp in Kielce, Poland, during the war. At the trial, however, it was established that Walus was never at the camp, never a member of the Gestapo, never a member of the SS, and that in fact all of Wiesenthal’s charges against Walus were fabrications. This prompted the US Justice Department to drop all charges, issue an apology, and pay Walus $34,000 to help offset his legal fees.

12/14/1983: A series of arson attacks at four Connecticut synagogues seemed to be the work of Jew-hating racists. When the culprit is finally apprehended, however, it turns out to be a 17-year-old boy who was a member of one of the synagogues (New York Times). Those darned Jew-hating racists sure are tricky.

12/16/1983: The West German weekly newspaper Deutsche National-Zeitung publishes a sketch made by Simon Wiesenthal (which first appeared in Wiesenthal’s 1946 book, KZ Mauthausen) that supposedly shows three Mauthausen inmates who had been bound to posts and sadistically put to death by the Germans. Unfortunately for friends of the Holocaust myth (and Wiesenthal’s almost non-existent credibility), the newspaper also reprints three photos from the July 11, 1945 Life magazine that record the firing-squad execution of three German soldiers during the Battle of the Bulge. The connection? Wiesenthal’s sketch is shown to be nothing more than a poor rendition of the Life photos with a politically-correct caption. For those familiar with Wiesenthal’s book, you will remember that he also cites a “confession” of camp Commandant Ziereis that 4 million inmates were gassed to death at Mauthausen, when it is well known that no more than 206,000 people were ever sent to Mauthausen and its satellite camps.

12/28/1983: While on his way to a court appointment, Holocaust revisionist Ernst Zündel is attacked by JDL thugs, who knock him to the ground on the very steps of the courthouse, then proceed to beat and spit on Zündel and his attorney. Police offer virtually no protection and make no arrests.

02/06/1984: Outside a Canadian courthouse, a throng of armed JDL thugs (led by Marvin Weinstein … alias Meir Halevi) awaits the arrival of Holocaust doubter Ernst Zündel as they did two months earlier. This time, however, Zündel is able to make it to and from the courthouse without incident. Furious at being denied the opportunity to attack and beat a defenseless person, the JDL crowd then sets upon the news reporters and cameramen they had invited to record the occasion.

07/04/1984: The Institute for Historical Review is attacked by arsonists and burned to the ground in a vain attempt to silence the world’s leading voice for truth about the Holocaust myth. JDL activist Jerry Rubin proudly and defiantly claims foreknowledge of the arson attack, and names Los Angeles Police infiltrator/informant Larry Winston as the perpetrator. Local police and the FBI investigate briefly, then lose interest in what has been called the worst case of political terrorism in the history of the United States.

01/07/1985: The Toronto Globe and Mail reports that for the third time in as many appearances, Holocaust skeptic Ernst Zündel, his defense attorney, and a legal assistant are attacked on the steps of a Canadian courthouse (!) by 25 blood-seeking JDL thugs while the police and media stand by. Later, four members of the JDL mob are charged with disturbing the peace (not assault or attempted murder), charges which are subsequently dropped.

01/12/1985: According to the Toronto Globe and Mail, Arnold Friedman swore under oath that he had seen “fourteen foot flames” shooting out of the chimneys of crematorium at Auschwitz, and that he was able to tell whether the Nazis were burning fat Jewish Hungarians or skinny Jewish Poles by looking at the different colors of the smoke and flames coming out of the crematorium. On cross-examination, however, Mr. Friedman reversed himself upon being presented with details of crematorium operation, and was forced to agree that perhaps Jews were not being burned in crematoria buildings. Mr. Friedman then made the startling confession that his entire testimony was based on what he had been told by others.

01/17/1985: Maria Bohuslawsky of the Toronto Sun reports on a cross-examination that took place the day before, in which self-proclaimed Holocaust “expert” and author Raul Hilberg admitted under oath that after 36 years of studying the Holocaust, 1) he knew of no documentary (printed) evidence that the Nazis murdered or planned to murder Jews in gas chambers, 2) he had identified large parts of the key “confession” of Kurt Gerstein as to the “gassings” as “pure nonsense” and “totally false,” 3) when presenting the Gerstein “confession” as proof of Nazi misdeeds he had edited out inconvenient sections in order to make his point, 4) he knew of no autopsies that showed death by gassing, 5) he billed himself as a Holocaust expert for 18 years before even visiting Auschwitz (he then spent only one day there), 6) he was not familiar with many books on the subject of which he was alleged to be the expert, and 7) he knew of no scientific proof that even one Jew had been gassed. (see also the article on the same date by Kirk Makin in the Globe and Mail, and the Sault Star of 1/18/85.) Understandably, when called upon to testify again in a later trial, Hilberg begged off.

01/21/1985: The Alberta Report magazine quotes Holocaust survivor Eva Brewster as remembering how the bodies of Jews gassed at Auschwitz would be dropped through trap doors to the crematoria. Left out of the article are the facts that 1) no one else has ever “remembered” these trap doors, 2) no one else “remembers” that the “gas chambers” were above the crematoria, and 3) that there is no trace of these trap doors, either in blueprints, photographs, or in any other way.

01/24/1985: Holocaust heavyweight Rudolf Vrba, under cross-examination in a Canadian courtroom, states under oath that 150,000 French Jews were gassed at Auschwitz, in spite of the fact that the entire number of Jews deported from France were only 75,721. Vrba claims he arrived at his count “scientifically” by having listened to the language spoken by the inmates at Auschwitz and examining their luggage (!). The author of “I Cannot Forgive” next confessed that his book was “an artistic picture … not a document for a court,” in spite of the fact that Vrba’s testimony was crucial to both the War Refugee Board and the Auschwitz Trials in West Germany. Vrba further admitted that his written and pictorial descriptions of Auschwitz crematoria were a result of guessing, based on “what I heard it might look like.” Oops!

02/07/1985: As reported in the Toronto Sun, Robert Faurisson testifies under oath that there were never any gas chambers, mass murders, or other atrocities against Jews or anyone else during WWII. Dr. Faurisson is a professor in France, where he received his PhD from the Sorbonne. (see also the Canadian Jewish News, February 14, 1985)

02/08/1985: Wendy Darrocn, writing in the Toronto Star, recounts the sworn testimony of Russell William Barton, who was a medical student volunteer with the British Red Cross on May 2, 1945, when he entered the concentration camp at Bergen-Belsen. According to Barton, there was no evidence of intentional starvation of the inmates, which has been the charge against Bergen-Belsen since the dropping of the original charge that Bergen-Belsen had homicidal gas chambers.

02/12/1985: The Montreal Gazette reports that Dr. William Bryan Lindsey, who has a doctorate in chemistry from the University of Indiana at Bloomington, and who for 33 years has been employed as a research chemist, gives sworn testimony that it would have been physically impossible for the Nazis to exterminate millions of Jews with Zyklon B in the large, unsealed rooms that are being presented to the gullible as “gas chambers.”

02/16/1985: Sixth International Revisionist Conference, Anaheim, CA.

02/24/1985: The Toledo Blade cites Rabbi Charles Rosenzveig as claiming that soap was made from human fat at Buchenwald, and was an example of the “inconceivable” behavior of Germans during WWII.

02/28/1985: Ellen Kachuck, of the B’nai B’rith of Toronto, is quoted in the Toronto Globe and Mail as being far from pleased with the progress of the ongoing trial against Ernst Zündel, who claims the Holocaust never took place. Says Kachuck, “I think it was a much messier affair than we expected it to be in terms of things coming out we didn’t want.” Translation: the truth can be so inconvenient when you are trying to disseminate the Big Lie.

03/01/1985: The Toronto Globe and Mail, in a truly gutsy move, prints a photo of the swimming pool at Auschwitz taken by Swedish researcher Ditlieb Felderer, who has taken some 30,000 photos of Nazi concentration camps and conducted forensic tests on Holocaust-related artifacts. This is the first time this photograph has been published. Earlier in the year, a judge had refused to admit this photo (and others) as evidence because it did not fit his preconceived notions about WWII concentration camps.

04/22/1985: After WWII, Max Glauben was told his two aunts had been sent to the gas chambers at a German extermination camp. He assumed he was the only surviving family member. Today, his aunts telephoned Glauben in Dallas from Philadelphia after finding his name in a computer data bank maintained by the National Register of Jewish Holocaust Survivors.

04/23/1985: The New York Times records the Auschwitz memories of one Pearl Herskovic, who says she saw her whole family go up in “billowing smoke” from an crematorium chimney, and that her family’s “ashes began to fall on my arm.” Apparently, scientific fact and technical impossibility cannot withstand irrational “truths” that are drummed into people’s heads through endless repetition and suppression of contrary information.

05/15/1985: The home of revisionist Dr. George Ashley is damaged by a crude explosive. The letters “JDL” are spray-painted on the sidewalk in front of the home. This is the fourth time in three years that Dr. Ashley’s home has been attacked by thugs.

05/19/1985: Canadian journalist Doug Collins (North Shore News, North Vancouver, BC) becomes the first established journalist in North America to tell readers that the Holocaust story just doesn’t add up.

05/31/1985: A character in the comic strip Dondi vividly recalls (over 40 years later) the “big red chimney and Zyklon B poison gas” … at Dachau! Considering that no one seriously puts forth the proposition that Dachau had homicidal gas chambers, this is indicative of the future of the entire Holocaust myth … relegated to the make-believe world of the funny pages.

06/07/1985: The Israeli daily Ha’aretz reports on a study by the University of Haifa that shows, once again, that the majority of Jewish children in Israel see Arabs as “terrorists and murderers of children.” It appears that Israelis have learned the lessons of fascism well.

07/27/1985: Professional Holocaust survivor Mel Mermelstein settles a lawsuit against the Institute for Historical Review out-of-court in exchange for $90,000 and a simple apology. Mermelstein had sued the Institute for Historical Review for $17 million for various causes, including mental anguish, sleepless nights, and injurious denial of established historical fact (a cause of action hitherto unused in American courts, but popular in communist courts). It is estimated that the trial cost Mermelstein $150,000, and his law firm claims to have donated $400,000 worth of legal work to this one case.

08/05/1985: Rabbi Meir Kahane, Orthodox Jew, Zionist, member of the Knesset, and founder of the Jewish Defense League, is quoted in the New York Times as saying, “Western democracy as we know it is incompatible with Zionism.” No wonder the state of Israel has no constitution or bill of rights.

10/02/1985: Rabbi Marvin Hier, Dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, under questioning from a caller during a talk show on KCKC radio (San Bernardino), first claims there were no gas chambers at Treblinka (twice), then he says there were gas chambers and that he knows who operated them, then he says Treblinka started with small gas chambers and then graduated to something else, then he says that there were gassings at Treblinka, then not. He winds up by saying that the “gas chambers” were mostly at Majdanek, Auschwitz, and Birkenau.

10/19/1985: Reverend Dr. Franklin H. Littel is quoted in the Jerusalem Post (international edition) as saying, “You can’t ‘discuss’ the truth of the Holocaust. That’s a distortion of free speech … The US should emulate West Germany, which outlaws such public exercises.” Of course, on July 26, 1984, Littel came out in The Jewish Times as being four-square in favor of the 1st Amendment when it comes to religious freedoms, saying “We who love liberty should also view with grave concern the use of government to punish or suppress persons and groups whose religious views we think are wrong-headed.”

10/29/1985: The case against Friedrich Rainer is dismissed in a Vienna courtroom when the neither the plaintiff nor the prosecuting attorney (provided by Simon Wiesenthal himself) show up for the trial. Rainer had been accused or challenging the Holocaust myth, and the plaintiff, Dr. Ella Lingens, claimed to be able to “prove” that homicidal gas chambers existed at Auschwitz. I guess now we’ll never know.

11/01/1985: Professional Holocaust survivor Mel Mermelstein sues the Institute for Historical Review for $60,000 because a letter from the Institute to Mermelstein was held up in the mail. Judge Charles Jones awards Mermelstein $38.36, considerably less than the hourly charge of Mermelstein’s high-priced attorney.

11/24/1985: After rocks were thrown through the windows of eight Jewish-owned shops in an apparent encore performance of similar acts two weeks earlier, Mayor Ed Koch and Jewish groups spring into action with an offer of $15,000 for information about the culprit. We do not know who collected the reward, but the vandal turns out to be 38-year-old Gary Dworkin, a Jewish resident of Boro Park.

01/28/1986: West German police storm the home of Otto Ernst Remer to seize a copy of a videotape that challenges the myth of the Holocaust … an obvious thought-crime.

02/15/1986: In an interview on WNET with professor of Jewish History Dr. Yosef Yerushalmi, Bill Moyers asks Yerushalmi to clarify his statement that the image of the Holocaust is being shaped not on the historian’s anvil but in the novelist’s crucible. Yerushalmi replies that because the historical research has now all been done (!), the door is wide open for an infinite number of fictional refrains on this, the central event of all history. Translation: Let the brainwashing begin.

02/15/1986: Seventh International Revisionist Conference, Los Angeles, CA.

03/13/1986: Police raid a home near Brussels, Belgium, on behalf of West German authorities, seeking to confiscate a videotape that challenges the Holocaust myth … another blow against free speech.

03/16/1986: Melvin Konner in the New York Times Book Review points out that poet Avraham Stuzkever, claimed by Allen Ginsberg to have been killed in a ghetto during WWII, is in fact alive and well and living in Tel Aviv.

03/24/1986: An AP wire service story in the Schenectady Gazette tells of a reunion between two childhood friends, Lieba Wainer and Yacob Basner. Coincidentally, Basner not only married another friend of Wainer’s who Wainer had presumed murdered by Nazis, but had been in the same concentration camp with Wainer’s husband between 1940 and 1945 (!), although they never met.

03/25/1986: West German police raid the house of Ernst Roemer in Hamburg in search of a booklet challenging the Holocaust myth. Police were alerted to the existence of the book by examining a bookstore’s order for the book, which was purchased before the book was banned. George Orwell was right.

03/30/1986: The New York Times Book Review runs a letter to the editor concerning Martin Gilbert’s book, The Holocaust, in which the correspondent quotes Gilbert as writing, “… on Oct. 20, 1944, (Yitzhak) Sonenson’s mother and sister were killed …” The letter writer then goes on to introduce herself as Yitzhak Sonenson’s sister, Yaffa Eliach. She continues, saying, “My brother Yitzhak is quite aware of my existence. In frequent family reunions on both sides of the Atlantic, we celebrate this great gift of life.”

04/08/1986: Police raid the home of retired judge Wilhelm Staeglich, searching for prohibited materials (that is, those challenging the Holocaust myth). They find nothing, but confiscate some other documents for good measure.

04/27/1986: An article in the Los Angeles Times by staff writer Robert Gillette reveals that enormous numbers of Russians, Ukrainians, Balts, Poles, and others welcomed the German invaders as liberators from communism and from the suffering they had endured during the 1920s and 1930s. One Red Army general, Andrei Vlasov, even raised an army to fight alongside the Germans in hopes of helping to bring down Stalin.

05/06/1986: The Institute of Historical Review presents official testimony to the Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education subcommittee of the Education and Labor Committee ofthe House of Representatives, urging that Holocaust studies not exclude facts and research that might not be consistent with orthodoxy. This effort to support the First Amendment is repaid with an attack on the IHR in the Congressional Record by Rep. Jim Saxton (R-NJ).

05/19/1986: Rabbi Charles Rosenzveig, responding to questions from revisionist Bradley Smith on West Bloomfield radio station WSPD-AM, admits that the human-soap story is only a rumor. So what? Well, previously Rabbi Rosenzveig had exhibited absolutely no compunctions about perpetrating the lie that soap was made from human fat at Buchenwald, and was an example of the “inconceivable” behavior of Germans during WWII (see the Toledo Blade, February 24, 1985).

06/12/1986: An editorial in the Washington Times reveals that enormous numbers of Russians, Ukrainians, Balts, Poles, and others welcomed the German invaders as liberators from communism and from the suffering they had endured during the 1920s and 1930s. One Red Army general, Andrei Vlasov, even raised an army to fight alongside the Germans in hopes of helping to bring down Stalin.

06/28/1986: Raul Hilberg, fresh from his appearance as a witness at the trial of Canadian Ernst Zündel, is quoted in the Jerusalem Post as doubting the veracity of key Holocaust witnesses, pointing up the severe shortcomings of not only the magic 6,000,000 figure but exterminationist estimations of Holocaust dead in general, and challenging survivor accounts. During questioning by Zündel’s lawyer Doug Christie, Hilberg was forced to concede that although he cited SS officer Kurt Gerstein ten times in his book (Destruction of the European Jews), he did so only after editing parts of the Gerstein statements that were “pure nonsense” and “totally false.”

08/17/1986: A front-page article by B. Amouyal in the Jerusalem Post quotes Yad Vashem Archives director Shmuel Krakowski to the effect that “Over half of the 20,000 testimonies from Holocaust survivors on record at Yad Vashem are ‘unreliable’ and have never been used as evidence in Nazi war crimes trials.” The story also states, “Krakowski says that many survivors, wanting ‘to be part of history’ may have let their imaginations run away with them. ‘Many were never in the places where they claim to have witnessed atrocities, while others relied on second-hand information given them by friends or passing strangers,’ according to Krakowski.” (paragraph) “A large number of testimonies on file were later proved inaccurate when locations and dates could not pass an expert historian’s appraisal.”

09/01/1986: The Baltimore Gay Paper examines the unedited Dutch version of Anne Frank’s diary and comes to the conclusion that Ms. Frank was a lesbian. And you say you thought history had nothing to do with politics.

09/02/1986: The FBI connects the tossing of a tear gas grenade during a performance of the Moiseyev Dance Company at the Met to the Jewish Defense Leagure (JDL).

09/03/1986: US District Court Judge Lawrence Sydick approves a motion by the Institute of Historical Review to dismiss a lawsuit by professional Holocaust survivor Mel Mermelstein.

09/25/1986: Washington Jewish Week reports that Theodore Weiner, head of Judaica cataloguing at the Library of Congress, is creating a new subject heading for Holocaust revisionist literature (separate from establishment Holocaust literature, which until the late seventies was placed among other books on WWII), presumably to avoid any confusion among those who wish only to learn one side of the story.

10/20/1986: The FBI connects the pre-performance firebombing of the Moscow State Symphony to the Jewish Defense League (JDL).

11/17/1986: The SPOTLIGHT (Washington, DC) reveals that the FBI was ordered by National Security Council analyst Genneth de Graffenried to omit from its 1984 report on domestic crime the terrorist attack on the Institute of Historical Review. de Graffenried has been categorized as a dual-loyalist (that is, loyal to both America and Israel) and Israel-firster (that is, putting the wants, needs, and wishes of Israel ahead of those of America, in spite of his oath of office).

11/24/1986: An official Israeli inquiry finds no evidence that Austrian President Kurt Waldheim committed Nazi war crimes against the Jews. Previously, Simon Wiesenthal had spoken of Walheim’s guilt as if it was absolute truth, which is one reason why the old Nazi hunter Wiesenthal is held in such low regard by law enforcement agencies around the world.

01/28/1987: SS Gruppenfuehrer Gerhard Klopfer, who served as state secretary in the Party Chancellery under Martin Bormann and was the last surviving member of the Wannsee Conference (at which it was alleged that details were worked out for the “final solution”) dies in Heilbronn, West Germany. Klopfer was charged with war crimes at Nuernberg, but the case was dropped for lack of evidence, and in fact Klopfer was permitted to resume practicing law in 1956. This lends credence to the proposition that the Wannsee Conference had nothing to with with an extermination program.

02/09/1987: The following piece on memory by Philip Ziegler (New York Times Book Review) appeared in Forbes. “Between 1936 and 1945 an ingenious anthropologist called Tom Harrison set up a network of observers to record the views of the Briton-in-the-street on a wide range of issues. The fruit of his labors, the Mass Observation Archive, contains many first-hand accounts of incidents that occurred during the wartime blitz, which were written immediately after the event and can therefore reasonably be accepted as accurate. Some 30 years later, a number of the surviving ‘mass observers’ were asked to revive their memories. In every case, the relationship between the original and the revised version was so remote as to be almost coincidental. Yet, but for the original written evidence, their oral testimony would have been accepted as eminently reliable.”

02/09/1987: The New York Post reports that during a chance encounter between New York city Mayor Ed Koch and Long Beach businessman and professional Holocaust survivor Mel Mermelstein, Mermelstein informed the Mayor that “I was part of the special detail which hauled the bodies from the gas chamber and took them to the crematorium.” He apparently also told Koch that he had seen Dr. Mengele directing traffic to the gas chambers. Interestingly enough, in Mermelstein’s memoir Not by Bread Alone (1979) he says nothing about either one of these allegations. When deposed in connection with a court suit in 1981, he denied that had had done any physical work at all at the camp, and forgot to mention his eyewitness account of Dr. Mengele. Also during the deposition, he denied seeing the gas chambers at any time other than May 22, 1944, when his mother and two sisters were “gassed.” Mermelstein’s memory, like some wines, seems to be improving with age.

05/01/1987: Cherry Hill, New Jersey, police arrest three men, including 18-year-old Jew Matthew Tannenbaum, for vandalizing the predominantly Jewish Woodcrest Country Club on April 18.

05/01/1987: US Secretary of the Interior Donald P. Hodel informs a crowd of some 6,000 Holocaust survivors that Holocaust education is as important for Americans as the history of their own nation. Apparently, Hodel is unaware that the last thing the Holocaust lobby wants is more study of the facts and claims surrounding the Holocaust story.

06/29/1987: The Chicago Tribune reports the reuniting of a family thought to have been murdered by the Nazis during WWII. For 40 years, Lucia Miller “thought her sister and an aunt were the only other members of her family to survive the Holocaust. This weekend, she saw differently: About 130 cousins — from her generation to her grandchild’s — gathered in Chicago from around the world for a Mintz family reunion.” The story goes on to say that “family members from Florida, California, Israel, France, and Brazil arrived to join the celebration.” Helene Pomeranc from Paris “thought it was just my father and me.” The reunion was the result of 30 years of effort by Harry Mintz, who searched for relatives by advertising in Eurpean newspapers and looking through thousands of telephone book pages. While reunions such as that of the Mintz family are not every day occurences, they are by no means unusual. Unfortunately, each family member often believes that all the other family members were murdered, multiplying the death toll, while few make any attempt to locating missing family members.

07/03/1987: Rabbi Dr. Samuel A. Turk claims in the New York Jewish Press that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated because he had blasphemed when he said “Ich bin ein Berliner” in Berlin in 1963. Turk’s remarks were part of an open letter to President Ronald Reagan, in which the cleric expressed his outrage that Reagan had publicly challenged Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev to tear down the Berlin Wall.

07/16/1987: A Washington Times article about the opening of a mass grave in Poland carries the headline, Mass Grave in Poland Dug up But Only Germans are Found. Imagine the outcry if the racially-, ethnically-, and religiously-sensitive Times (owned by Reverend Sun Myung Moon) had run a headline reading, Mass Grave in Poland Dug up But Only Jews are Found, or Mass Grave in South Africa Dug up But Only Blacks are Found.

08/06/1987: A 19-year-old Jew Gary L. Stein is arrested for burning a swastika on the lawn of a private home in Rockville. (Washington Jewish Week)

08/06/1987: Irv Rubin, Earl Krugel, and Robert Manning, all members of the radical Zionist Jewish Defense League (JDL) are booked for investigation of using an explosive device at the Beth-Sar Shalom Religious Center. (Associated Press)

08/06/1987: The “anti-Semitic” arsonist who destroyed the Woodside synagogue in Silver, Spring on April 8, 1986 is now reported to be known to have been a member of the congregation, but because the suspect has left the area no arrest has been made. If the perpetrator had been a white non-Jew, the worldwide man-hunt would have ended in the death penalty for sure.

08/24/1987: The New York Post prints a nine-page spread of wartime photos, said to have come from the collection of the late Tscherim Soobzokov, who had been acquitted of charges that he was a member of the Einsatzgruppe during WWII. Lurid captions are provided by Elie Wiesel and Lucjan Dobroszycki (the later being the senior research associate of New York’s YIVO Institute for Jewish Research). A few days later, the son of the actual owner comes forward to claim the photos, which had been stolen from his apartment. The photos were part of a collection of photos purchased in Germany during the owner’s military service after the war, and had nothing to do either with Soobzokov or with the demonstrably false captions assigned them by Wiesel and Dobroszycki.

09/11/1987: The Los Angeles B’nai B’rith Messenger informs us that in early 1944 Hitler ordered SS commander Heinrich Himmler to do away with “all maimed, disabled German soldiers, including SS troops, who were of no further use to the Third Reich,” using gasoline injections (!). This proposed slaughter of 750,000 German solders was allegedly stopped by Pope Pius XII. There is no mention why author Kurt Margalit is apparently the only historian ever to hear of this story, although we can certainly guess why no credence (or follow-up activity) was ever given it.

10/11/1987: Eighth International Revisionist Conference, Irvine, CA.

10/27/1987: German taxi driver Denis Doyle, who had been arrested and subjected to a house search after he was found distributing materials relating to Holocaust revisionism, has his case dismissed despite the best efforts of Juergen Hess and Judge Wolfgang Menz.

11/26/1987: Haim Shapiro, in Israel’s leading English-language daily (The Jerusalem Post) reports, “Despite widespread acceptance of the Holocaust as a tragedy unique in Jewish history, leading Torah scholars are ‘unanimous’ in ‘denying the uniqueness of the Holocaust as an event different … from any previous national catastrophe,’ according to British Chief Rabbi Sir Immanuel Jakobovits.” (paragraph) “The British chief rabbi noted that this was the case, despite the existence of what he described as ‘an entire indultry, with handsome profits for writers, researchers, film-makers, monument builders, museum planners, and even politicians.’ He added that some rabbis and theologians were ‘partners in this big business.’” Translation: There’s no business like Shoah business.

11/26/1987: The Winnipeg Free Press reports that the B’nai B’rith has been found guilty of libel, and assessed damages of $400,000 (a record at that time). The judgment came because of B’nai B’rith’s publication of an investigation of allegations of anti-Semitic remarks by a political opponent, which cost the opponent the election.

12/15/1987: The Aurora School District in Colorado demotes Hinkley High School teacher Dorothy Groteluschen for letting slip to her students that there are two sides to the Holocaust myth. Groteluschen later sues for back pay and wins (February 1, 1991).

02/10/1988: The automobile of German historian Ernst Nolte was set ablaze, apparently as a reminder that neither anti-communism nor scholarship are universally appreciated. Nolte, whose 1987 book The European Civil War, 1917-1945: National Socialism and Bolshevism expresses pusillanimous support for examining the Holocaust myth more carefully, is nonetheless considered a radical among the establishment German historians. Nolte’s transgressions began in June 1986, when he published a cautiously dissident essay in the West German daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Battling Nolte are Marxist academics such as Jurgen Habermas, who oppose any neutral discussion of the National Socialist (Nazi) era.

02/13/1988: Journalist Robin Ludlow of the Southam News, commenting on Canada’s continuing ban in the import of certain books in the Hamilton, Ontario Spectator, notes “there are some patterns to what is prohibited and what isn’t. Customs seems to clamp down harder on criticism of Jews, Zionists, Communists, and blacks than it does on criticism of Germans, Nazis, Arabs, right-wing groups, and fundamentalist Christians.” As of December 1987, there were over 500 titles on the Canadian Customs list of prohibited “hate material,” including a tape of the Phil Donahue show, the Tomorrow show, and a Larry King radio program.

02/22/1988: Arthur Rosenblatt, director of the United States Holocaust Museum, is quoted in the Washington Post as calling for everything and anything relating to the Holocaust myth, including “photographs, diaries, original letters and notes to families from the camp (sic).” Apparently, eyewitness accounts of new extermination camp (sic) arrivals being immediately marched, naked, from the trains to the waiting doors of the gas chambers have heretofore left out the fact that the condemned were allowed great latitude in their actions for the last few moments of their lives.

02/24/1988: High school teacher Giovanni Pinto of Montville, New Jersey, is suspended by school authorities for challenging the historicity of the Holocaust. Thought crimes must not go unpunished.

02/25/1988: Fred Leuchter and his team leaves for Poland, where they will obtain samples of suspected “gas chambers” at Auschwitz and Birkenau, the heart of the alleged Nazi Holocaust machine. The results of the test conclusively show that none of the so-called “gas chambers” in either facility was ever used for such a purpose. Subsequent testing by others confirm Leuchter’s findings. Conclusion: the Holocaust never happened.

03/20/1988: An article in the Baltimore Sun calls attention to the rising incidence of impostors who tell grisly stories of wartime derring-do in Vietnam, but who never served there, let alone saw combat. Psychologists and counselors working with Vietnam veterans have identified one telltale sign of these liars; a propensity to claim involvement in some atrocity, such as massacring women and children. One is reminded of exterminationist Germaine Tillion’s thoughts on this issue back in July 1954, at which time she wrote “Those persons (who gratuitously lie) are, to tell the truth, very much more numerous than people generally suppose, and a subject like that of the concentration camp world — well designed, alas, to stimulate sado-masochistic imaginations — offered them an exceptional field of action. … There have been publishers to print some of their imaginings, and more or less official compilations to use them, but publishers and compilers are absolutely inexcusable since the most elementary inquiry would have been enough to reveal the imposture.”

04/20/1988: Speaking at a conference on Group Defamation and the Freedom of Speech, keynote guest Elie Wiesel urges that freedom of speech and inquiry on the alleged Holocaust be proscribed. Wiesel called revisionists “the most despicable of our enemies,” and claimed that French revisionist scholar Dr. Robert Faurrison was “haunting” and “persucuting” him. When Wiesel was asked if his admonition to every Jew to maintain “a zone of hate — healthy, virile hate — for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German” might qualify as “group defamation,” conference organizer Monroe Freedman intervened to denounce the question as anti-Semitic.

04/29/1988: Israeli citizen Michael Wolffsohn, teacher at the official West German War College, is quoted in the weekly Deutsche National-Zeitung as saying the Jews need the Holocaust story and anti-Germanism to maintain Jewish collective identity. Furthermore, according to Wolffsohn, “Whenever there are day-to-day or historical-political differences of opinion between Germany and foreign countries, the Holocaust has proven to be a suitable instrument against Germany, and no one gives up an effective tool, especially in politics.” Wolffsohn’s comments first appeared in a special edition of Das Parlament.

05/13/1988: A Washington Post story about a bus-load of 5th graders trapped in a tunnel filled with diesel exhaust fails to ask why the 5th graders were able to survive their ordeal for 40 minutes when the Nazis are alleged to have used diesel exhaust to kill thousands (if not millions) of Jews and others during WWII.

05/22/1988: The Seattle Times reports an eyewitness account by 90-year-old University of Washington professor emeritus Nikolai Poppe that charges the Nazis with digging a hole 50 yards square near Nalchik, in the Soviet Caucasus, and using it as a mass grave as they executed all the prisoners from the Nalchik city jail. One week later, readers of the Seattle Times were informed through a letter to the editor signed by David Knechtges and 30 other professors and staff members from the University that Poppe had been misquoted, and that the massacre in question had been carried out not by the Germans but by the Soviet NKVD. After attempts to portray the Germans as executioners for other Soviet mass murders such as those at Lvov (Lemberg) in 1941, Katyn in 1940, and Vynnytsia between 1937 and 1939, this seems rather par for the course.

06/13/1988: The ADL issues a report on anti-Semitic incidents that includes such unthinkable crimes as distributing pro-Arab literature and criticising the policies of the state of Israel. (DC Observer)

07/18/1988: The home of Canadian James Keegstra is subject to an arson attack. Keegstra, who denies the Holocaust took place, had recently successfully appealed his conviction under Canada’s obscurantist hate laws.

09/09/1988: University College (at Cork, Ireland) professor Dermot Keogh is quoted in the Bangor, Maine Daily-News as having discovered that the Irish government was loath to admit Jewish refugees during the 1930s and 1940s. In his book “Ireland and Europe 1919-1949,” Keogh cites secret Irish government documents in which Jews are described as “a potential irritant in the body politic” who had “disproportianate wealth and influence.” In severely limiting Jewish immigration during the Hitler years, Irish policy was in line with that of virtually all other nations, pro- or anti-German, including the United States and Britain.

09/26/1988: The Christian News reproduces a map issued by the International Tracing Service (ITS) that shows Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, and Dachau as concentration camps, not as death camps. The so-called death camps are shown as being Riga Jungfernof, Minsk, Treblinka II, Chelmno, Sobibor, and Belzec. The accompanying article points out that at one time the International Red Cross said that about 300,000 Jews died during WWII from all causes.

11/28/1988: It seemed a clear case of vandalism when swastikas appeared for a fourth time in the hallway of a Yonkers woman who supported a controversial desegregation plan, accompanied this time by death threats. By December 1, however, the culprit turns out to be no one else but the victim herself, Laurie Recht. (New York Daily News)

01/18/1989: Yitzhak Shamir is quoted in the Los Angeles Times (page 12) as saying: “One of the angers I have against these people of the intifada is that they make us sometimes kill people we don’t want to kill.”

01/22/1989: Claims that modern day German medical students are still using “body parts from Nazi (Holocaust) victims … for medical experiments” are dismissed as being another baseless horror story, in an article by Daniel Johnson appearing in the London Daily Telegraph.

02/18/1989: Ninth International Revisionist Conference, Southern California.

02/19/1989: In Miami, Florida, Denis Rety, a Jewish businessman, is ordered to pay $5.5 million to a man he falsely accused of being anti-Semitic. Mr. Rety had earlier become involved in an argument with the man, a customer at Rety’s restaurant, and apparently figured that the only way to win the debate was to libel his opponent.

02/21/1989: The Great Holocaust Debate gets off to a slow start when anti-revisionists Hal Lindsey (author), Glen Peglau (attorney), John Montgomery (author), and Tom Anderson (attorney) fail to show up to debate revisionists Mark Weber (author), Robert Faurisson (professor), Bradley Smith (author), and Robert Countess (doctor).

03/03/1989: Simon Wiesenthal renews his claim that Dr. Josef Mengele is still alive, in spite of tests performed by six pathologists, including three hired by the Simon Wiesenthal Center.

03/27/1989: The Christian News reports that theologian Hal Lindsey believes that Satan started revisionist inquiry surrounding the Holocaust myth, and that Satan is responsible for anti-Semitism.

04/04/1989: Isser Harel (Mossad, Shin Bet) and Arnold Forster (ADL) denounce Simon Wiesenthal’s claims to have aided in the capture of Adolf Eichmann, in the Daily News Bulletin of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. (see March 3, 1989 for related story)

04/17/1989: Daniel Goldhagen, writing in the New Republic, rails against exterminationist author Arno Mayer, and his book Why Did the Heavens Not Darken? The reason? Mayer announces his intention to treat what he calls Judeocide according to the canons of historical scholarship rather than following the elsewhere much vainted eyewitness system. Mayer admits that “Sources for the study of the gas chambers are at once rare and unreliable.” Also, “Most of what is known is based on the depositions of Nazi officials and executions at postwar trials and on the memory of survivors and bystanders. This testimony must be screened carefully, since it can be influenced by subjective factors of great complexity.” And another, “Besides, from 1942 to 1945, certainly at Auschwitz, but probably overall, more Jews were killed by so-called ‘natural’ causes than by ‘unnatural’ ones.” Mayer also cites as a reference The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, by Arthur Butz, a key revisionist work.

07/17/1989: Patrick Buchanan’s column in the Washington Times defends rocket scientist Arthur Rudolph of charges he was a Nazi.

07/18/1989: The Asbury Park Press reports that two Jewish teens will face charges that they spray-painted swastikas and anti-Semitic remarks on a home and a car. No doubt, the Holocaust made them do it.

07/22/1989: The Jerusalam Post reports claims by Israeli citizen Israel Carmi, who served in the British Army’s Jewish Bridage during WWII, of his role in the kidnapping and murder of an unspecified number of Germans during the last months of 1945 and 1946. One must wonder why this confessed murderer is exempt from prosecution.

09/10/1989: In Binghamton, NY, swastikas and slogans (including “Kill Kikes” and “Zionazi Racist”) are found inside the door leading to the Jewish Student Union of the State University. However, the New York Times of November 15, 1989, reports that the culprit is none other than the former president of the Jewish Student Union, James Oppenheimer, who lead the pack in condemning the vandalism.

09/16/1989: Revisionist scholar Dr. Robert Faurisson is brutally attacked and severely injured for the sixth time by three young men claiming membership in The Sons of the Memory of the Jews near his home in Vichy, France. The assailants reportedly sprayed a Mace-like chemical in Faurisson’s face and then repeatedly struck and kicked the professor in th eface, head, and chest. Dr. Faurrison sustained a broken jaw, nose, and ribs, and severe injuries to the head. To date, the police have done nothing to apprehend the culprits.

09/21/1989: Cardinal Jozef Glemp of Poland accedes to Jewish demands that the Carmelite convent at Auschwitz (and its offensive 23-foot cross)be moved to another site. News accounts of the confrontation between Catholic and Jew make seemingly endless reference to the 2.5 million Jewish deaths and 1.5 million other deaths that allegedly occurred at Auschwitz.

09/22/1989: The Associated Press reports that the Soviet Red Cross has turned over information regarding the deaths of over 74,000 [actually closer to 69,000] wartime internees of Auschwitz to the International Red Cross. The news story, which cites Valentina Fatyukhina, head researcher at the Soviet Red Cross, as saying, “The deaths of over 74,000 people were neatly recorded, day after day, hour after hour, in 46 huge volumes. Their names, the birthdates, and the names of parents were written down.” These volumes, which have been hidden away by the Soviets for 45 years, remain hidden until 2/11/92 for fear that revisionists will make use of them(!).

11/12/1989: Yehuda Bauer, a leading Holocaust honcho who directs the Hebrew University of Jerusalem’s Division of Holocaust Studies and is editor-in-chief of Pergamon Press’s periodical Holocaust and Genocide Studies, downgrades his estimate of Auschwitz deaths yet again. Ten years ago, Bauer claimed 3.5 million lives were lost at Auschwitz. In 1982, he changed his story to 2.5 million. Today in the New York Times, he claims about 1,600,000. For his troubles, Bauer is slammed by other members of the Holocaust fraternity.

11/16/1989: Exterminationist historian Martin Broszat dies. Broszat, director of the Institute for Contemporary History in Munich, was the first establishment historian to state publicly that Dauchau, Bergen-Belsen, and Buchenwald were not death camps, and that no death camps were located in old Germany (1937 boundaries). On May 3, 1979, Broszat admitted in a West German courtroom that “the six million is a symbolic number.” Broszat also took the “ultrafunctionalist” view that Hitler neither planned nor ordered the Holocaust.

11/20/1989: Tyler G. Kent dies. As a young American diplomat in London in 1940, Kent attempted to warn the American and British people of the secret and illegal machinations of FDR in fomenting WWII. The government rewarded his patriotism by disavowing Kent and giving him over to the British for a secret trial and imprisonment until after the end of the war. He had violated no American laws, and he was neither charged nor convicted of espionage by the British.

11/21/1989: The Palm Beach Post (West Palm Beach, FL) claims in the description of the unveiling of a monument to “Holocaust survivors” that the memorial will commemorate the “genocide of 30 million Jews.” If a little lie is good, a bigger lie must be better.

11/29/1989: The Madison, Wisconsin, Capital-Times reports the sad story of David Rubinsky, who claims to have been denied the Medal of Honor because he is Jewish. Mr. Rubinsky claims to have single-handedly killed 500 Japanese soldiers in the Pacific theater during WWII. The ADL supported his claim, prompting the Army to investigate. They found that Mr. Rubinsky had made up the entire affair, a finding that the ADL now accepts (Janesville WI Gazette, January 31, 1990).

12/13/1989: El-Istiglal magazine publishes a Holocaust revisionist study of the myth of the Nazi gas chambers, a first for the official PLO magazine.

02/04/1990: Opening day for Miami Beach’s new Holocaust memorial … a 72 foot tall outstretched hand, crawling with miniature human figures. It is uncertain whether the sculpture is to memorialize Jews who were allegedly murdered by the Nazis during WWII, or if it is designed to memorialize Werner Nachmann, the defunct head of West German Jewry, who stole close to $16 million of the “war reparations” fraudulently wrung from German taxpayers.

02/11/1990: The Israeli Supreme Court agrees to reopen the case against American auto worker John Demjanjuk to consider new evidence supporting Demjanjuk’s alibi.

02/14/1990: Assistant professor of history Donald D. Hiner of Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis is suspended for advocating a critical examination of various components of the exterminationist Holocaust position. Hiner is later fired on March 1.

02/20/1990: Dr. Wojciech Gubala and Eng. J. Labedz from the Institute of Judicial Expertise, Dept. of Legal Toxicology, Cracow, Poland, lead a team of investigators to Auschwitz-Birkenau to conduct forensic tests of the alleged “gas chambers.” Their report, dated August 24, 1990, supports earlier forensic tests by American expert Fred Leuchter: none of the so-called “gas chambers” were ever used for that purpose.

02/25/1990: 60 Minutes airs a segment on John Demjanjuk in which they uncover witnesses who can positively state that Demjanjuk is not a war criminal. These witnesses have been prevented from testifying, which is hardly surprising considering the way Demjanjuk has been railroaded with false eyewitnesses, forged documents, and questionable legal tactics on an international scale.

02/26/1990: The Jerry Williams Show on WFXT (Boston) breaks new ground by actually finding an exterminationist willing to debate against the revisionist viewpoint. Unfortunately for Williams and JDL representative Michael Slomich, revisionist Brad Smith and American gas chamber expert Fred Leuchter absolutely and totally demolish every exterminationist claim in front of an estimated audience of 100,000.

02/28/1990: U.S. Representative James A Traficant (D-Ohio) calls to our attention further serious flaws in the case against retired American auto worker John Demjanjuk.

03/01/1990: Assistant professor of history Donald D. Hiner of Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis is fired for advocating a critical examination of various components of the exterminationist Holocaust position. So much for the 1st Amendment.

03/17/1990: In an unprecidented move, tenured professor Dr. Robert Faurisson is deprived of his chair at the University of Lyon-2 by the French Minister of Education, due to Faurisson’s continuing role in questioning the Holocaust myth.

04/04/1990: Jack Wikoff gives a presentation on Holocaust revisionism at Wells College in Aurora, NY. An Orthodox Rabbi (a Holocaust survivor and Nuernberg participant) declines an invitation to appear before the all-woman audience to provide rebuttal.

05/07/1990: The Christian News devotes an issue exclusively to the revisionist side of the Holocaust story.

05/07/1990: The Visalia Times-Delta prints an article critical of the authenticity of the Diary of Anne Frank. The ensuing hubbub on the opinion and letters pages lasts for weeks.

05/27/1990: A court in Haifa, Israel sentences a Jew to three years in prison after he confesses to desecrating more than 300 Jewish graves in the hope that Arabs would be blamed. (New York Times)

07/17/1990: The Washington Times runs an article by Krzysztof Leski and Ohad Gozani (of the London Daily Telegraph) reporting that Poland has cut the official Auschwitz death toll from 4 million to just over 1 million. According to the article, “Israeli experts said evidence to support the lower estimate had been mounting for some time,” and “Shmuel Krakowsky, head of research at Israel’s Yad Vashem memorial for Jewish victims of the Holocaust, said the new Polish figures were correct.”

07/31/1990: Influential Australian Jewish academic Dr. Frank Knopfelmacher condemns the ongoing campaign against alleged Nazi war criminals as an ill-considered exercise motivated by revenge that fosters social strife, and against The Simon Wiesenthal Center for helping to foment “ethnic hatred.” (The Australian)

08/13/1990: The blame for numerous desecrations of synagogues in the Federal Republic of Germany over the previous 40 years is laid at the door of the KGB, who was attempting to defame the FRG (Die Welt, Hamburg). For those familiar with Soviet propaganda tactics since the communist take-over, this comes as no surprize.

08/24/1990: The toxicological department of the Medico-Legal Institute in Krakow releases the results of forensic tests on the so-called gas chambers of Auschwitz that show no evidence of homicidal gassings. This report adds further credibility to virtually identical findings by American gas chamber expert Fred Leuchter is his report of similar tests he performed on these facilities in 1988.

09/20/1990: The Huntsville Times reports that “[A] damning document used in Canada’s immigration hearing last month against exiled German rocket scientists Arthur Rudolph may have been a forgery …” on the part of the U.S. government.

09/24/1990: The Washington Times reveals that the Office of Special Investigations (OSI) knowingly uses fraudulent testimony to railroad “Nazi war criminals” living in the United States. These phony war criminals include Arthur Rudolph, John Demjanjuk, and Andrija Artukovic. The charges are so serious that the FBI starts an investigation.

10/10/1990: Tenth International Revisionist Conference, Washington, D.C.

10/11/1990: Diane Paul, of the American Red Cross, is quoted in the Chicago Sentinel as saying that the 46 volumes of the Auschwitz death books will not be made public because doing so would help those who challenge the traditional version of Holocaust extermination claims.

11/23/1990: This Week In Germany reveals that members of the German military who dispute the official Holocaust story are now liable for dishonorable discharge. Apparently, it is okay to defend freedom but not okay to actually try to use it.

12/14/1990: The Canadian Supreme Court rules that free speech is okay in Canada … unless you are discussing the Holocaust myth, at which time infringement of free speech is “reasonable.”

12/16/1990: Author Ream Arnouf reports in the Los Angeles Times that in July of this year the Palestinian Red Crescent Society (Red Cross) published an article which cites revisionist scholarship in challenging the myth that gas chambers were used to murder Jews in WWII.

01/05/1991: Historian Mark Weber reveals for the first time aerial photographs of Treblinka taken between May and November 1944. These photographs clearly show that Treblinka was a transit camp and not an extermination camp (Ukrainian-born American auto worker John Demjanjuk was found guilty of helping to kill 850,000 Jews at Treblinka). Weber also exhibits aerial photographs of Auschwitz-Birkenau (first made public by the CIA in 1979) that clearly show an absence of corroboration of the Holocaust extermination myth.

02/01/1991: Colorado teacher Dorothy Groteluschen wins a court battle against the Aurora School District to receive back pay after being demoted on December 15, 1987 for acknowledging there were two sides to the Holocaust myth. (Rocky Mountain News, March 12; Denver Post, March 17)

02/14/1991: German member of parliament Heinrich Lummer calls for an open and truthful treatment of the Holocaust myth in the prestigious daily Frankfurter Allgemeine newspaper.

02/15/1991: Recycling the old “gas chambers” propaganda that first surfaced in WWI and then again in WWII, the Brooklyn Jewish Press claims that “Iraqis have gas chambers for all Jews” in an enormous front-page headline. According to the accompanying story, Saddam Hussein has built gas chambers for exterminating Jews everywhere in the world. You can’t keep a good lie down. (see also Response, Spring 1991, page 2)

03/23/1991: The Leuchter Kongress is held in Munich for the purpose of examining issues surrounding the Holocaust myth.

04/18/1991: Professor Robert Faurisson is convicted in France (that bastion of free speech) of questioning the Holocaust myth.

05/02/1991: Lord Shawcross, chief British prosecutor at the Nuernberg Tribunal of 1945-46, speaks out against the pending War Crimes law that was later pushed through by Margaret Thatcher, John Majors, and extreme pressure from Zionist groups (notibly those in Southern California). Fair trials in such “war crimes” cases are almost impossible, Lord Shawcross explains, because “witness identification, notoriously the frailest form of human testimony,” is particularly unreliable after so many years. “Evidence of identification is unsafe after four weeks and hopeless after forty years.” As the cases of Frank Walus and many others in the United States and elsewhere have shown, such fears are well founded. British officials plan to use the new law to prosecute three cases starting immediately upon passage. (New York Times)

06/11/1991: Massachusetts state officials set aside a criminal complaint against execution hardware expert Fred Leuchter instead of proceding with the trial, which had been set for June 24. The complaint arose after Leuchter published his report on forensic tests of the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camps and found no evidence that the facilities had ever been used in homicidal gassings. Groups supporting the Holocaust myth forced the state to bring the suit in an effort to discredit Leuchter, in light of their inability to respond substantively to the report itself.

06/16/1991: The Deland (FL) Sun News publishes a commentary entitled Exactly what is Holocaust Truth? The pieces centers on the disparity between the dogmatic, ritualistic view of the Holocaust and the Western historiographical tradition of objective inquiry into the past.

06/18/1991: In an apparent attempt to smear American gas chamber expert Fred Leuchter, the Washington Post grossly misrepresents the facts surrounding the charges against Mr. Leuchter, as can easily be seen by comparing the direct quotes in the article with the Post’s commentary. Furthermore, the Post reveals that the real reason behind Mr. Leuchter’s persecution is the efforts of Jewish organizations including the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).

07/12/1991: An editorial in the North Lake Tahoe Bonanza rings down the curtain on the debate raging in the Letters section about the Holocaust myth. What started with one letter from a local reader protesting a $30,000 appropriation for Holocaust education expanded to many letters over a period of several weeks. These letters (where were sent in by those on both sides of the issue) in a newspaper of relatively small circulation are an encouraging indication of the growing impact of Holocaust revisionism. A debate of this depth and intensity would have been all but unthinkable just a few years ago,

09/19/1991: Professional Holocaust survivor Mel Mermelstein drops his $11 million, 6-year-long court case against the Institute for Historical Review. Mermelstein had sued the IHR in hopes of forcing them to stop their Holocaust revisionist activities, but after losing virtually all of the pre-trial hearings, Mermelstein’s high-powered Beverly Hills legal team threw in the towel, voluntarily withdrawing complaints of libel, conspiracy to inflict emotional distress, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Truth and justice prevail!

09/26/1991: The New York Review of Books launches the Simon Wiesenthal Center into orbit by publishing an ad for two books from the Institute for Historical Review: Ingrid Weckert’s Flashpoint: Kristallnacht 1938, and Harry Elmer Barnes’ Barnes Against the Blackout: Essays Against Interventionism.

10/07/1991: The New York Review of Books again launches the Simon Wiesenthal Center into orbit by publishing an ad for two books from the Institute for Historical Review: Ingrid Weckert’s Flashpoint: Kristallnacht 1938, and Harry Elmer Barnes’ Barnes Against the Blackout: Essays Against Interventionism.

10/24/1991: An ad calling for open debate on Holocaust extermination claims appears in the student newspaper of the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, signalling the start of a maelstrom of controversy that continues for months. The ad later appears in the student newspapers at Duke University at Durham, NC (Nov. 5), Northeastern Illinois University at DeKalb (Nov. 11), Cornell University at Ithaca, NY (Nov. 11), and Rutgers University at New Brunswick, NJ (Dec. 3). Other student newspapers reject the ad, but are swept into the dicussion nevertheless. The controversy even prompts commentators for general-circulation magazines to enter the fray. (see November 15, 1991 for an example)

11/10/1991: During a tape-recorded interview reproduced in the Los Angeles Times, presidential hopeful David Duke expresses skepticism about the Auschwitz extermination story, correctly mentioning, for example, that there were recreation and entertainment opportunities for the inmates in the camp. Even a blind pig finds an acorn once in awhile.

11/15/1991: Commentator Wesley Pruden of the Washington Times condemns the idea of openly discussing the Holocaust myth, and urges editors of student newspapers to reject ads calling for such a debate. Nobody ever said free speech was pretty. Similar articles appear in the New York Post (Eric Breindel, Nov. 28), and in the apparently misnamed Atlanta Journal/Constitution (Tom Teepen, Nov. 28).

11/17/1991: ABC Television’s Nightline program reports on the rise of neo-Nazism in Germany. The broadcast makes it clear that many of Germany’s young disbelieve the Holocaust myth, and best-selling British historian David Irving is quoted as saying that within two years no one who follows the issue will believe the legend of the extermination gas chambers.

11/17/1991: Fred Leuchter, Jr., the first person to conduct forensic tests on the so-called “gas chambers” at Auschwitz (with negative results), is arrested in Britain and deported back to the United States for the egregious crime of giving his opinion of the Holocaust which (unfortunately for him) is at variance with the establishment line.

11/20/1991: In an ad on page A19 of the Los Angeles Times, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) urges a declaration of war on Nazis.

12/03/1991: The Rutgers University Daily Targum student newspaper rejects an ad urging open debate on the Holocaust myth, but agrees to publish it is an opinion piece alongside the opposing viewpoint (opposing free speech, apparently).

12/04/1991: The Institute for Historical Review (IHR) challenges revisionist-bashing attorney Alan Dershowitz of the Harvard Law School to an organized public exchange about the Holocaust story. Two months go by before Dershowitz responds … by chickening out.

12/21/1991: The Washington Post becomes the first major metropolitan newspaper to agree that open discussion about the Holocaust is okay, saying “Students should be encouraged to investigate the Holocaust story the same way they are encouraged to investigate every other historical event,” and “the truth has [nothing] to fear from scrutiny.”

12/23/1991: Katherine Bishop’s interview of revisionist Bradley Smith in the New York Times treats revisionism fairly, quoting Smith accurately and without the usual rancor … a real breakthrough in the nation’s “newspaper of record.”

02/04/1992: Attorney Alan Dershowitz of the Harvard Law School, who has taken upon himself the role of revisionist-basher, declines an invitation to engage in an organized public exchange with Mark Weber of the Institute for Historical Review.

02/11/1992: American Red Cross president Elizabeth Dole announces that the public will be given greater access to German wartime documents that were seized by Allied forces at the end of WWII. The detailed records include transport lists and death registry volumes from German concentration camps. It is estimated that all of the German records seized at the end of the war together carry the names of between 300,000 and 500,000 internees. This decision marks a reversal of the 10/11/90 announcement by American Red Cross’ Diane Paul.

02/11/1992: Mark Weber addresses a seniors’ honors class at Mission Viejo high school (Orange County, CA). The students expressed skepticism but were cordial and appreciative of Mr. Weber’s viewpoint.

02/15/1992: Mark Weber appears on KCAL’s Cross Check half-hour public affairs TV program. Also appearing is Rabbi Nachum Shifren, representing the radical Kach movement. Rather than rebut Mr. Weber, Rabbi Shifren chooses to denounce “anti-Semites” and “Arabs,” and without any evidence whatsoever called Mr. Weber a Nazi and accused the Institute for Historical Review (IHR) of having links with the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and “neo-Nazi” groups.

03/05/1992: At a community meeting to promote the Holocaust in Westlake Village, CA, Renee Firestone and another Holocaust survivor tell whoppers about the camps, including: 1) the Germans found a community of midgets (!), transported them to Auschwitz, shot them (!) en masse, and then were forced to let them sit in a pile for three days until the crematories could take them, 2) the Germans piled death bodies three stories high at Bergen-Belson, and 3) after the war, the Jews “never never” took retribution on their jailers. The gullible public swallowed it whole.

03/13/1992: Associated Press dispatches from Vienna reveal a report by Austrian engineer Walter Lueftl, which is yet another authoritative confirmation of the findings of American gas chamber expert Fred Leuchter. Lueftl writes, “The mass murder with Zyklon B [which was allegedly used to kill Jews in Auschwitz gas chambers] could not have taken place. Not only would this have violated natural law, but the technical and organizational prerequisites for it did not exist. On the basis of structural considerations, the crematories could not have handled the number of victims. Corpses are not burning materials. To burn them requires considerable time and energy.”

03/27/1992: In a series of articles, the Los Angeles Times describes the furor created among Jewish organizations by the luncheon invitation extended to Austrian President Kurt Waldheim by German Chancellor Hermut Kohl. Waldheim, who has been accused of “war crimes” (but never tried nor convicted) has been treated like a pariah even by the United States, where people are supposedly innocent until proven guilty.

04/08/1992: Maud S. Beelman in the Santa Monica Outlook reports that “sophisticated genetic testing has confirmed that Josef Mengele, the Nazi ‘Angel of Death,’ died in Brazil in 1979.” This news will no doubt come as somewhat of a blow to Holocaust survivor Siegfried Halbreich, who claims to have seen Dr. Mengele playing piano in a small combo at a Los Angeles area restaurant in 1980. Said Halbreich at that time, “I could not be wrong in recognizing Mengele.”

05/18/1992: A German court convicts 80-year-old Josef Schwammberger to life in prison for “war crimes.” Despite the crowing of various Jews and Jewish groups over the verdict and sentence, it is generally assumed that this will be the last major Nazi war crimes trial. (Santa Monica Outlook)

06/01/1992: Defense attorney Yoram Sheftel demands that the Israeli Supreme Court overturn the conviction of client John Demjanjuk.

06/01/1992: The U.S. Supreme Court rejects an appeal by Jewish groups to throw out the case brought against them by the widow of revisionist David McCalden. The suit charges that pressure and threats from the Jewish groups forced the California Library Association to cancel his exhibit scheduled for a Los Angeles hotel in December, 1984. (Santa Monica Outlook)

06/07/1992: Four years after the jailing of John Demjanjuk as Ivan the Terrible, new evidence has the prosecutor doubting the conviction, and a U.S. court is re-examing the retired autoworker’s extradition.

06/11/1992: An Associated Press report out of London casually mentions that included in the just-released documents of Rudolf Hess is a memo of Hess’ peace terms: Germany was to hold sway in a European sphere of influence, while Britain was to keep its empire. Hess was found guilty of war crimes at Nuernberg and sentenced to life in prison.

07/04/1992: The London Independent claims that a complete copy of the diaries of Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s propaganda minister, have been found in Russian archives in Moscow.

07/04/1992: Yossi Melman writes in the Jerusalem Ha’retz that Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir headed a special hit squad during his 10 years (1955 to 1964) in Isreal’s Mossad secret service. The article notes that Shamir was recruited in part because he had “a lot of experience in murder, assassinations, planting bombs, threats, and harassment.”

08/27/1992: The Canadian Supreme Court throws out the “hate crimes” law that had been used against publisher Ernst Zündel, a Holocaust revisionist, completely exonerating him. The decision comes after nearly ten years of legal wrangling at the instigation of Jewish groups in Canada and the United States.

10/28/1993: American Fred Leuchter, Jr. is arrested and jailed for four weeks in Germany on the basis of a speech he made there in 1991 dealing with technical aspects of the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz and Majdanek.

11/30/1993: American Fred Leuchter, Jr. is released on bail from Mannheim jail in Germany, where he had been held for four weeks for a public speech he made in 1991 about technical aspects of the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz and Majdanek.

09/03/1994: The Twelfth International Revisionist Conference, Irvine, California.

06/15/1995: Anti-revisionist historian Jean-Claude Pressac capitulates on the historiography of the Holocaust, stating that, when all is said and done, the official dossier on the Nazi concentration camps is “rotten.” He even adds that the dossier is irremediably “rotten” and that, consequently, it is “bound for the rubbish bins of history”! He draws up a veritable indictment against “memory” which has “taken precedence over history,” against the distortions inspired by “resentment and vengeance,” against the communists and their associations, which have set themselves up as the guardians of a false truth. He says: “Approximation, exaggeration, omission and lying characterise the majority of the accounts of that period.” He asks: “Can things be put back on an even keel?” and answers: “It is too late. An overall rectification is humanly and materially impossible.”

02/12/2003: Holocaust revisionist Ernst Zündel is arrested at his home in Tennessee on fraudulent charges of immigration transgressions. At the time, Zündel is legally married to a legal U.S. citizen, which for just about anyone else confers U.S. citizenship. Zündel is eventually deported to Canada, where he is held for two years. Canada then rules that Zündel, an utterly peaceful person, represents a threat to Canadian security. In 2005 Zündel is deported to Germany, where he is put on trial as a thought criminal (yes, you read that correctly: Thought crimes in 2005).

07/23/2003: Anti-revisionist Jean-Claude Pressac, once hailed as the man who triumphed over revisionism and revisionists (especially including Robert Faurisson), dies in complete obscurity at the age of 59.

10/22/2005: Revisionist Germar Rudolf is arrested in the U.S. on a fraudulent charge of immigration transgressions. At the time, Rudolf is legally married to a U.S. citizen. However, as the example of Ernst Zündel shows, when the Holocaust lobby wants to get you, legalities are secondary. Rudolf is deported to Germany where he is imprisoned, as he was previously tried and sentenced in absentia for thought crimes. He faces the possibility of between 5 and 15 years incarceration for having a different opinion of the Holocaust myth.

11/01/2005: Unanimously and without a vote, the representatives of the 191 nations making up the UN adopt — or let be adopted — an Israeli-drafted resolution proclaiming January 27th “International Day of Commemoration in memory of the victims of the Holocaust.” Moreover, the resolution “Rejects any denial of the Holocaust as an historical event, either in full or part.” Historical revisionism thus sees its existence acknowledged by the whole world, while at the same time revisionists find themselves struck with the reprobation of all the countries of the world.

11/11/2005: British historian David Irving is arrested for thought crimes in Austria. Irving had been tried and convicted in November 1989 for giving two speeches in Austria, and had been barred from the country. Irving faces up to 20 years in prison.

12/08/2005: “Although we don’t accept this claim, if we suppose it is true, our question for the Europeans is: is the killing of innocent Jewish people by Hitler the reason for their support to the occupiers of Jerusalem?

12/08/2005: “If the Europeans are honest they should give some of their provinces in Europe — like in Germany, Austria or other countries — to the Zionists and the Zionists can establish their state in Europe. You offer part of Europe and we will support it.”

12/08/2005: “Some European countries insist on saying that Hitler killed millions of innocent Jews in furnaces and they insist on it to the extent that if anyone proves something contrary to that they condemn that person and throw them in jail.

12/08/2005: Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad outrages the western world by becoming the first world leader to question the Holocaust. Ahmadinejad is quoted as saying:

12/14/2005: “If somebody in their country questions God, nobody says anything, but if somebody criticises the myth of the massacre of Jew, the Zionist loudspeakers and the governments in the pay of Zionism will start to scream.

12/14/2005: “They have invented a myth that Jews were massacred and place this above God, religions and the prophets.

12/14/2005: Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad reiterates his earlier statement about the Holocaust myth. Ahmadinejad is quoted as saying:

12/14/2005– “Our proposal is this: give a piece of your land in Europe, the United States, Canada or Alaska so they (the Jews) can create their own state.”

12/16/2005: “After the Second World War, the Zionists have spread lies that Hitler, Austria, and Germany killed more than six million Jews in the furnaces in order to create a favorable situation for themselves in the world.”

12/16/2005: “The recent comments made by the president … are completely logical and are what all Iranians say.”

12/16/2005: Senior Iranian cleric Ayatollah Ali Meshkini told worshippers at Friday prayers that he supports Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s recent comments that the Holocaust is a myth.

12/18/2005: Spokesman Hamid-Reza Asefi of the Iranian Foreign Ministry tells reporters at his weekly press briefing that the view expressed by Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad that there are some doubts about the Jewish Holocaust is not something new and is a matter of “scholarly debate.”

12/22/2005: Mohammed Mehdi Akef, the leader of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood (the largest opposition force in the country), supports Iran President Mahmud Ahmadinejad’s calls for scholarly investigation and debate on the Holocaust. Akef is quoted is saying, “Western democracy has attacked everyone who does not share the vision of the sons of Zion as far as the myth of the Holocaust is concerned.” The next day, his office “clarifies” his statement, issuing a statement that Akef did not mean to say that the Holocaust never happened.

16.  The Present – Commentary on recent media coverage of the holocaust

I’ve never seen a President — I don’t care who he is — stand up to [the Jews] … They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wouldn’t write anything down. If the American people understood what a grip these people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms. — Admiral Thomas Moorer, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Richard H. Curtiss, A Changing Image: American Perceptions of the Arab-Israeli Dispute. American Educational Trust, 1986

Following are my comments on recent media coverage of the Jewish holocaust and World War II.

Secrets of The Dead – Bugging Hitler’s Soldiers

On May 2nd, 2013, the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) published the documentary film Secrets of The Dead: Bugging Hitler’s Soldiers on their website. The film documents a secret bugging operation of high ranking World War II German military personal that were held prisoner by the British. Over 100,000 hours of audio recordings are are said to have been captured by MI19, the division of British intelligence who bugged the elaborate homes in which the prisoners were held. We are told that the audio tapes were transcribed, translated and sent directly to Winston Churchill. There are several factual inaccuracies presented in the film and one notably large omission. Here is a link to the transcript of the film for reference.

The foremost problem is one of authenticity; the original recordings were destroyed, we are told, which is decidedly convenient as it is now impossible to verify whether what was recorded actually matches the transcripts. It is also worth pointing out that most of the personnel monitoring the listening equipment were Jewish refuges from Germany. Why British intelligence would task Jewish refuges with gathering possibly vital information from key military personal, of which many were generals, from the very people who persecuted them is nearly unfathomable to me. We are told the reason is because of their familiarity with the German language which insinuates there were no German speaking personnel in Britain available to do the work. If that was the case, British intelligence must have had a very difficult time translating the hoards of other German communications that were intercepted.

The film refers to the former Buchenwald concentration camp in Germany as a death camp, which it was not. There were no homicidal gas chambers at Buchenwald and both mainstream historians and revisionists agree on this point.

This film repeats the long debunked claim that lampshades were made from tattooed human skin. References: 1, 2, 3, 4

During the film the viewer is presented with a very well known — and very forged — photograph of prisoners in a bunk house at Buchenwald:

Buchenwald Missing Man Forgery
Forged version of the infamous Buchenwald barrack photograph

The original photograph, published in the May 6th, 1945 edition of The New York Times Magazine, is somewhat less dramatic (click to enlarge):

Buchenwald Missing Man Forgery - Original
Original version of the infamous Buchenwald barrack photograph (click to enlarge)

One of the most important aspects of the film was not what it contained, but what it didn’t contain; at no time are gas chambers mentioned, homicidal or otherwise. I don’t think there is any doubt whatsoever that PBS would have showcased any hint of gas chambers had a single one of the German prisoners referred to them, even casually, among the 100,000+ hours of audio tape. It would seem there was little chance that any conversation about gas chambers could have been missed since, as we are told, “MI19 specially designed microphones reached everywhere; nothing was out of range.”, and “We knew that the microphones must have been of very high quality because we could hear the prisoners very clearly and even if they whispered to their cell mate it was very often possible to pick up what they said.”.

It is always well worth questioning the integrity of mainstream media. One could begin by asking ask who owns the very few companies that control approximately 80-90% of everything we read, watch and listen to. Who are the board members and what relationships with other institutions do they have? As with my article about NPR, the conflicts of interest present within PBS were blatantly obvious, including ties to the National Security Agency (NSA), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Obama for America, Polaris Government Relations and several other companies, institutions and foundations. Among the board members of PBS is Sharon Percy Rockefeller who is a member of the Bilderberg Group. The Bilderberg Group is sort of a private club, not unlike the Bohemian Club, whose members rank among the worlds richest and most powerful people on the planet and include heads of state, future presidents and prominent politicians, media representatives, bankers and others, many of whom are Jewish. Their agenda, the content of their meetings and even the guest list are kept secret, though more is being learned about this elite club with the advent of the internet.

As with National Public Radio, one may wonder where the “public” is in the Public Broadcasting Service — an organization that, very much like NPR, is funded in part by the the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the government and various foundations and private corporations. The public media watchdog organization, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR), has published several articles critical of PBS, including Problems at PBS, From Rose to KochPBS Drone Coverage Brought to You by Drone Makers, PBS Goes to Israel and Palestine–Mostly Israel, PBS Reports Iran Nuke Claims as Facts and many others.

17.  The Future – Glimpsing a better future for all the people of Earth

“Today we have access to highly advanced technologies. But our social and economic system has not kept up with our technological capabilities that could easily create a world of abundance, free of servitude and debt.” — Jacque Fresco, The Venus Project

Off Your Knees, Germany! — Ernst Zundel

Let Your Life Be a Friction to Stop the Machine


18.  The Law – Laws which restrict historical revisionism and freedom of speech

“To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?” — Kevin Alfred Strom, 1993

Truth Does Not Fear Investigation

If you live in one of the following countries, there are laws that restrict historical revisionism and freedom of speech. You should research any laws that may be applicable to you before sharing, publishing, or even discussing in public any subject which is critical of historical events, particularly the Jewish holocaust of World War II:

  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Bosnia
  • Canada
  • Czech Republic
  • European Union
  • France
  • Germany
  • Hungary
  • Israel
  • Liechtenstein
  • Lithuania
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Romania
  • Spain
  • Switzerland

In the case of the holocaust the term “denier” is often incorrectly applied to revisionists with the intention of discrediting them and insinuating that revisionists deny that atrocities were committed by the Nazis. By definition, revisionism is:

Advocacy of the revision of an accepted, usually long-standing view, theory, or doctrine, especially a revision of historical events and movements.

I applaud all who research the historical record and have the guts to voice their opinions and present the evidence they have gathered, despite the consequences.

19.  The Resources – Resources for further study

Some say that a holocaust denier is anyone who has studied the holocaust. — an article comment found on the web

The following resources, over 500 in number, in addition to those linked to in this document, represent only a small fraction of the enormous volume of material that is available regarding the study of the Jewish holocaust and Germany’s role in World War II.

Adolf Hitler – The Greatest Story Never Told

This recent piece of work by Dennis Wise, a documentary filmmaker from the U.K., provides an informative overview of Adolf Hitler and World War II

All 27 parts of film can be viewed for free at website where you can also donate to support the work of Dennis Wise.

Irene Zisblatt Specific

Auschwitz Specific

Homicidal Gas Chambers, General

Adolf Hitler Specific

Miscellaneous Revisionist Writings and Resources

Revisionist Persecution

Holocaust Survivors

Fraudulent Holocaust Survivors, Scams

Zionism and Jewish Influence, World War II Specific

Zionism and Jewish Influence, General

Jewish/Zionist Terrorism, False-Flags, Criminal Activities

Jewish Anti-Zionist Organizations

World War II Allied War Crimes

World War II, Holocaust and Revisionist Resources

Miscellaneous Video

Miscellaneous Resources


2 thoughts on “Rescuing Israel: The Holocaust

  1. My only goal in commenting is to help strengthen arguments and encourage critical thinking. My own views are irrelevant. Every argument needs a devil’s advocate to help the arguer collect his/her thoughts better and present them in a more fluid manner

    I am a little confused about the comparison about Dr. Mengele supposedly attempting to remove tattoos and Koch supposedly tanning the tattooed skin and making it into lamp shades. The author wonders why Dr. Mengele didn’t consult Koch about her tattoo removal technique and that he was “reinventing the wheel” by not doing so.

    The supposed technique Koch used was removing the skin completely. If Mengele injected the prisoners with chemicals in attempt to remove the tattoos, that suggests that he was probably just trying to remove the tattoo and not the entire skin thus not resulting in any scars or marks. Similar to the goal of modern day laser tattoo removal which is to remove the tattoo, not the skin its self. If Koch was making lamp shades, she actually wanted the tattoo intact.

    What people claimed her goal to be was an interesting lamp shade; which I guess indirectly removes tattoos from the (probably dead) person’s body. Tattoo removal would be a lot cheaper if we followed in Koch’s foot steps and scarring wasn’t an issue because all you would have to do is lop off a chunk of skin. But there is the problem of scarring in the real world. (Although on a side thought, laser tattoo removal leaves a bit of scarring anyway).

    I would also like to bring up the comment of the “watery soup filled with chemicals to destroy her reproductive organs” Zisblatt claimed to be given. Regardless of if it happened or not, the author states that he/she is doubtful that this happened solely because Zisblatt later had kids. I have a couple points on this.

    One is that most of the claimed experiments that the Nazi’s performed didn’t reportedly work anyway. And two, birth control in any form short of completely removing the organ is never 100%. From the pill to tying a woman’s Fallopian tubes to IUDs, there are multiple cases of pregnancies with all of them. I really doubt this “chemical” would be so selective as to only dissolve her reproductive organs. No chemical I’ve heard of is so selective. It would either dissolve all her insides or have some sort of horrible adverse affects to the rest of her body, or do next to nothing. If this story is true, than the chemical obviously didn’t do much.

Courteous opinions welcome

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s