Should Congress Eliminate Its Tax-Payer Funded Perks… And Live Like The Rest Of Us?


Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi of California

The median wealth of a House member is $765,010… For a senator it’s $2.38 million. Yet, incredibly, they still enjoy all of this:

  • $174,000 salary
  • Free company car
  • Free gas
  • Free parking (even at airports)
  • Free flights almost anywhere in the world
  • Per diem travel allowance… up to $3,000 a trip
  • A month’s paid vacation
  • 3-day work-weeks
  • Free membership to a top-flight gym
  • Pension plan and 401K plan
  • Full retirement benefits (including up to 44% of their six figure salaries) at age 62
  • Free top of the line health insurance with 10 plans to choose from
  • Fully covered – even with pre-existing condition

Being a member of Congress is the most lucrative “Public Service” job in the world. Are our representatives officially out of touch with the real America? Should Congress live like the rest of us?

Vote now to make your voice heard and receive a stunning report that shows the full scope of congressional abuse of power. You won’t believe how well members of Congress live – all at our expense.

Click HERE to cast your vote now.

WW~Notes: These facts, if true, are morally repugnant and utterly disgraceful considering the problems in America, that were mostly caused by the criminals in Congress and the Senate to begin with.  I am so done with these cretins!

The People Against the 800 Pound Gorilla

WW~Notes:  It’s nice to see, at least, partial truth coming from Counterpunch.  There are many obvious lies and untruths in the attached article regarding Jews, yet, it is still noteworthy and worth the read.  Seems as though even the ultra-Conservatives are not entirely behind Israel’s war drums against Syria, which will inevitably lead to Iran. 



The past ten days have seen what could be the start of an historic turning point away from endless war in the Middle East.  Public opinion in the United States, in harmony with the majority of people in the world, has clearly rejected U.S. military intervention in Syria.

But for this turn away from war to be complete and lasting, greater awareness is needed of the forces that have been pushing the United States into these wars, and will surely continue to do so until they are clearly and openly rejected.

An American friend who knows Washington well recently told us that “everybody” there knows that, as far as the drive to war with Syria is concerned, it is Israel that directs U.S. policy. Why then, we replied, don’t opponents of war say it out loud, since, if the American public knew that, support for the war would collapse?  Of course, we knew the answer to that question. They are afraid to say all they know, because if you blame the pro-Israel lobby, you are branded an anti-Semite in the media and your career is destroyed.

One who had that experience is James Abourezk, former Senator from South Dakota, who has testified:  “I can tell you from personal experience that, at least in the Congress, the support Israel has in that body is based completely on political fear – fear of defeat by anyone who does not do what Israel wants done. I can also tell you that very few members of Congress–at least when I served there – have any affection for Israel or for its lobby. What they have is contempt, but it is silenced by fear of being found out exactly how they feel. I’ve heard too many cloakroom conversations in which members of the Senate will voice their bitter feelings about how they’re pushed around by the lobby to think otherwise. In private one hears the dislike of Israel and the tactics of the lobby, but not one of them is willing to risk the lobby’s animosity by making their feelings public.”
Abourezk added : “The only exceptions to that rule are the feelings of Jewish members, who, I believe, are sincere in their efforts to keep U.S. money flowing to Israel. But that minority does not a U.S. imperial policy make.”[1]

Since we do not have to run for Congress, we feel free to take a close look at that highly delicate question. First, we’ll review the evidence for the crucial role of the pro-Israel lobby, then we’ll discuss some objections.

For evidence, it should be enough to quote some recent headlines from the American and Israeli press.

First, according to the Times of Israel (not exactly an anti-Zionist rag): “Israel intelligence seen as central to U.S. case against Syria.”[2] (Perhaps the fact that it is “central” also explains why it is so dubious[3].)

Then, in Haaretz[4]: “AIPAC to deploy hundreds of lobbyists to push for Syria action”. Or, in U.S. News and World Report[5]: “Pro-Israel lobby Seeks to Turn Tide on Syria Debate in Congress”. According to Bloomberg[6]: “Adelson New Obama Ally as Jewish Groups Back Syria Strike”. The worst enemies of Obama become his allies, provided he does what “Jewish groups” want. Even rabbis enter the dance: according to the Times of Israel[7], “U.S. rabbis urge Congress to back Obama on Syria”.

The New York Times explained some of the logic behind the pressure: “Administration officials said the influential pro-Israel lobby group AIPAC was already at work pressing for military action against the government of Mr. Assad, fearing that if Syria escapes American retribution for its use of chemical weapons, Iran might be emboldened in the future to attack Israel. … One administration official, who, like others, declined to be identified discussing White House strategy, called AIPAC ‘the 800-pound gorilla in the room,’ and said its allies in Congress had to be saying, ‘If the White House is not capable of enforcing this red line’ against the catastrophic use of chemical weapons, ‘we’re in trouble’.”

Even more interesting, this part of the story was deleted by the New York Times, according to M.J. Rosenberg[8], which is consistent with the fact that the lobby prefers to act discreetly.

Now, to the objections:

There are indeed forces other than the Israel lobby pushing for war.  It is true that some neighboring countries like Saudi Arabia or Turkey also want to destroy Syria, for their own reasons. But they have nowhere near the political influence on the United States of the Israel lobby.  If Saudi princes use their money to try to corrupt a few U.S. politicians, that can easily be denounced as interference by a foreign power in the internal affairs of the United States. But no similar charge can be raised against Israeli influence because of the golden gag rule: any mention of such influence can be immediately denounced as a typical anti-Semitic slur against a nonexistent “Jewish power”.  Referring to the perfectly obvious, public activities of the Israel lobby may even be likened to peddling a “conspiracy theory”.

But many of our friends insist that every war is driven by economic interests. Isn’t this latest war to be waged because big bad capitalists want to exploit Syrian gas, or use Syrian territory for a gas pipeline, or open up the Syrian economy to foreign investments?

There is a widespread tendency, shared by much of the left, especially among people who think of themselves as Marxists (Marx himself was far more nuanced on this issue), to think that wars must be due to cynically rational calculations by capitalists.  If this were so, these wars “for oil” might be seen as “in the national interest”.  But this view sees “capitalism” as a unified actor issuing orders to obedient politicians on the basis of careful calculations.   As Bertrand Russell put it, this putative rationality ignores “the ocean of human folly upon which the fragile barque of human reason insecurely floats”.  Wars have been waged for all kinds of non-economic reasons, such as religion or revenge, or simply to display power.

People who think that capitalists want wars to make profits should spend time observing the board of directors of any big corporation: capitalists need stability, not chaos, and the recent wars only bring more chaos. American capitalists are making fortunes in China and Vietnam now that there is peace between the U.S. and those countries, which was not possible during hostilities. As for the argument that they need wars to loot resources, one may observe that the U.S. is buying oil from Iraq now, and so does China, but China did not have to ruin itself in a costly war.  Like Iraq, Iran or Syria are perfectly willing to sell their resources, and it is the political embargoes imposed by the U.S. that prevent such trade. As for the “war for oil” thesis in the case of Libya, the Guardian recently reported that “Libya is facing its most critical moment since the ousting of Muammar Gaddafi with armed groups blockading oil fields and terminals, choking output to a 10th of normal levels and threatening economic disaster.”[9]As for Iraq, Stephen Sniegoski has shown, in The Transparent Cabal, The Neoconsevative Agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel, that the war was only due to the neoconservatives and that the oil companies had no desire whatsoever to go to war.  Indeed, there is no evidence of an “oil lobby” sending its agents to urge Members of Congress to vote for war, as AIPAC is doing.

And how does one explain that many of the most determined opponents of war are found on the right of the political spectrum?  Do the Tea Party, Ron Paul, Pat Buchanan, Justin Raimundo and, Paul Craig Roberts, among others, fail to see the wonderful profits to be made by capitalists in a devastated Syria?

The fact is that in the post-colonial period, wherever profits can be made through war, they can be made much more reliably in peaceful conditions, and most capitalists seem to have understood that. There is no need to conquer countries in order to purchase their resources, invest in their economies or sell them our products.  Most countries are in fact eager for legitimate trade.

On the other hand, it can be argued that the huge military-industrial complex (MIC) benefits from wars.  Doesn’t the MIC need wars to maintain the lifeblood of military appropriations? Here the matter is complex. The MIC benefits above all from various hyped-up threats of war, most notably the Soviet threat during the Cold War, which kept the credits and contracts flowing through the Pentagon.  But long, botched wars such as in Afghanistan or Iraq tend to give war a bad name, are economically ruinous and lead to questioning the need for the huge U.S. military. The MIC doesn’t need another one in Syria. Many military officers are openly hostile to mounting at attack against Syria.

The interests that profit directly from recent U.S. wars – and not from mere “threats” – are very few. They are above all the giant construction firms, Bechtel, Halliburton and their subsidiaries, which, through their connections with officials such as Dick Cheney, win contracts to build U.S. military bases abroad and sometimes to rebuild infrastructure destroyed by the U.S. Air Force. This amounts to a recycling of American taxpayers’ money, which in no way “profits” the United States, or American capitalism in general; besides, those construction firms are not big compared to major U.S. corporations.  These profiteers could never pose as a “justification” for wars, but are the mere vultures feeding off conflicts.

The basic responsibility for war of the U.S. military-industrial complex is simply that it is there.  And as Madeleine Albright famously said, “what is the use of having that splendid military if we don’t use it?”  In fact, ever since the collapse of the Soviet Union (and indeed arguably ever since the end of World War II), there is no obviously good reason to use it, and it might well be dismantled and resources redirected toward modernizing U.S. infrastructure and other useful and profitable activities.  However, an intellectual industry called “think tanks” has developed in Washington devoted to justifying the perpetuation of the MIC.  It specializes in identifying potential “threats”.  Over the years, these think tanks have increasingly come under the influence of billionaire benefactors of Israel such as Haim Saban (founder of the Saban Center at the Brookings Institution).  Since there are in reality virtually no serious threats to the United States calling for such colossal military strength, alleged “threats to U.S. interests” in the Middle East are invented by adopting supposed threats to Israel as threats to the United States.  Example number one: Iran.

People on the left are not wrong in supposing that Washington would want to defend “American geo-strategic interests”. Those certainly exist, and are a proper object of controversy. But the crucial question here is whether support for Israeli policy aims in the Middle East is among them.  Indeed, there is a sector of the U.S. foreign policy establishment that promotes an aggressive global foreign policy that amounts to a sort of world conquest, with U.S. military bases and military exercises surrounding Russia and China, as if in preparation for some final showdown.  But the fact is that the most active advocates of this aggressive policy are the pro-Israel neoconservatives of the Project for the New American Century that pushed the Bush II presidency into war against Iraq, and now, as the Foreign Policy Initiative, are pushing Obama toward war against Syria.  Their general line is that U.S. and Israeli interests are identical, and that U.S. world domination is good, or even necessary, for Israel. Such close identification with Israel has caused the United States to be intensely hated throughout the Muslim world, which is not good for the United States in the long run.

Perhaps because genuine, material or economic U.S. interests in going to war are so hard to find, the emphasis has shifted in the past decade to alleged “moral” concerns, such as “the responsibility to protect”, packaged with a catchy brand name, “R2P”.  Today, the strongest advocates of going to war are the various humanitarian imperialists or liberal interventionist, who argue on the basis of R2P, or “justice for victims”, or alleged “genocide prevention”.

There is a large overlap between humanitarian interventionism and support for Israel. In France Bernard Kouchner, who first invented and promoted the concept of the “right to intervene”, stated in a recent interview that “Israel is like no other country.  It is the result of the terrifying massacre of the Holocaust.” It is therefore “our duty” to protect it.  Bernard-Henry Lévy prodded the French government to start the war against Libya, making no secret that he considered he was acting as a Jew for the interests of Israel; he is now the foremost and fiercest advocate of bombing Syria.  In both France and the United States, advocates of “humanitarian” intervention justify bombing Syria by referring to the Holocaust in the past and to a hypothetical, and totally unsubstantiated, intention by Iran to risk national suicide by attacking Israel in the future.

In the United States, these concerns of the Israel lobby are given ideological and institutional expression by such influential advisors as Samantha Power, Madeleine Albright and the two Abramowitz’s (Morton the father and Michael the son, in charge of “genocide prevention efforts” at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum).  The argument is used repeatedly that because “we” did not intervene quickly enough against Auschwitz, we have an obligation to intervene militarily to prevent other possible slaughters.

On September 6, the Cleveland Jewish News published a letter from “leading rabbis” urging Congress to support President Obama’s plans to strike Syria. “We write you as descendants of Holocaust survivors and refugees, whose ancestors were gassed to death in concentration camps,” the letter said.  By authorizing bombing raids, the rabbis said, “Congress has the capacity to save thousands of lives”…

Without such dramatization, obscuring the reality of each new crisis with images of the Holocaust, the whole notion that the best way to promote human rights and protect populations is to wage unilateral wars, destroy what is left of the international legal order and spread chaos would be seen for the absurdity it is.  Only the fervor of the champions of Israel enables such emotional arguments to swamp reasonable discussion.

But one may reasonably ask what are the interests of Israel itself in inciting the United States to fight in Syria?  Israelis seem to have frightened themselves into believing that the very existence of another power in the region, namely Iran, amounts to an existential threat.  But the mere fact that a policy is pursued does not mean that it is necessarily in the interests of those who pursue it. That is again ignoring the “ocean of human folly”. Napoleon and Hitler had no interest or desire in bringing Russian troops to Paris or Berlin, but their policies led to precisely that. The emperors of Germany, Austria and Russia had no interest in launching the First World War, since, in the end, they all lost their thrones as a result of the war. But launch it they did. The future is unpredictable, and that is why it is difficult to deduce intentions from consequences.  Israel’s hostile policy toward its neighbors can reasonably be seen as self-defeating in the long run.

Oddly enough, some observers deny the obvious, arguing that Bashar al Assad has allowed Israel to occupy Syrian territory on the Golan Heights and has kept the border quiet (without explaining what else he could have done, given the relationship of forces) and concluding that Israel has no interest in toppling him.  But what matters is that Assad is allied with Hezbollah and with Iran. Israel hates Hezbollah for its successful resistance to Israeli occupation of Lebanon, and sees Iran as the only potential challenge to Israeli military supremacy in the region.

Even so, it is not certain that Israel’s war aim would be to overthrow Assad. A clue to Israel’s strategy is provided by a September 5 article in the New York Times[10]: “Israeli officials have consistently made the case that enforcing Mr. Obama’s narrow ‘red line’ on Syria is essential to halting the nuclear ambitions of Israel’s archenemy, Iran. More quietly, Israelis have increasingly argued that the best outcome for Syria’s two-and-a-half-year-old civil war, at least for the moment, is no outcome. For Jerusalem, the status quo, horrific as it may be from a humanitarian perspective, seems preferable to either a victory by Mr. Assad’s government and his Iranian backers or a strengthening of rebel groups, increasingly dominated by Sunni jihadis.”

“This is a playoff situation in which you need both teams to lose, but at least you don’t want one to win — we’ll settle for a tie,” said Alon Pinkas, a former Israeli consul general in New York. “Let them both bleed, hemorrhage to death: that’s the strategic thinking here. As long as this lingers, there’s no real threat from Syria.”

So, the real goal of the limited strikes (and the reason why they ought to be limited) would be to send a message to Iran, about its nonexistent nuclear arms program and, in Syria, let both sides “bleed to death”. How nice! Waging a war based on the flimsiest of evidence only to prolong a bloody conflict may not be a very moral endeavor for all those who claim to act out of passion for “our values” and for deep concern over the “suffering of the Syrian people”.

In its zeal to serve what it considers Israel’s interests, AIPAC and its affiliates practice deception concerning the issues at stake. The lobby misrepresents the interests of the United States, and even ignores the long term interests of the Jewish people whom it often claims to represent. It is pure folly for a minority, however powerful and respected, to try to impose an unpopular war on the majority. Since Israel often claims to represent the Jewish people as a whole, if the majority of Americans are forced to pay an unacceptable price for “defending Israel”, sooner or later voices will be raised blaming “the Jews”.  Indeed, this can be seen by a brief look at what already gets written, anonymously of course, on social media, ranging from various conspiracy theories to outright Jew-bashing.

We, who are totally opposed to the notion of collective guilt, wish to avoid such an outcome. Far from being anti-Semitic, we deplore all forms of “identity politics” that ignore the diversity within every human group.  We simply want to be able to say “no” openly to the pro-Israel lobby without being subjected to moral intimidation.  This has nothing to do with Jewish religion or identity or culture: it is entirely political.  We claim our right to refuse to be drawn into somebody else’s war.  We believe that these endless wars are not “good for the Jews” – or for anyone else.  We want to contribute to efforts at mutual understanding, diplomacy, compromise and disarmament. In short, to strengthen “the fragile barque of human reason” adrift on the ocean of human folly.  Otherwise, that folly may drown us all.

For now, the threat of war has been avoided, or at least “postponed”. Let us not forget that Iraq and Libya also gave up their weapons of mass destruction, only to be attacked later. Syria is likely to abandon its chemical weapons, but without any guarantee that the rebels, much less Israel, won’t retain such weapons. The popular mobilization against the war, probably the first one in history to stop a war before it starts, has been intense but may be short-lived.  Those whose war plans have been interrupted can be expected to come up with new maneuvers to regain the initiative.  These past days have given a glimpse of what can be accomplished when people wake up and say no to war.  This must be an inspiration for continued efforts to make diplomacy prevail over bullying, and mutual disarmament over endless war. If people really want peace, it can be possible.

JEAN BRICMONT teaches physics at the University of Louvain in Belgium. He is author of Humanitarian Imperialism.  He can be reached at

DIANA JOHNSTONE is author of Fools Crusade: Yugoslavia, NATO and Western Delusions.  She lives in Paris and can be reached at



[3] For a discussion of the “evidence,” see, for example, Gareth Porter: How Intelligence Was to Support an Attack on Syria,


Will Congress bow to Nuclear Blackmail?

Many of my readers have seen my article Nuclear Blackmail, which outlines the mysterious disappearance of helium 3 and the resulting inability of America to detect nuclear weapons moving into the nation through the ports, and also to track them around the country. Because helium 3 is a byproduct of the nuclear weapons industry, there is no reason at all for the lack of it in America, yet this is precisely what has happened – America ran out of it and because nuclear weapons detectors, which look for neutrionos actually consume helium 3 and need to be replenished, they are all now offline and America cannot protect its ports.

The reason for the lack of this isotope of helium can only be by pure intent, with people in key places making sure it somehow vanishes. THAT is how defeated America now is. And I do not believe it happened by accident, the article Nuclear Blackmail pretty much says it all.

Now the big question

Is our Federal government being blackmailed with a nuclear threat from Israel to attack Syria? Consider this – Never in the history of this nation has the government lacked the support of the people so strongly with any other topic. Even Faux News is reporting that support for the war is hovering around 15 percent, with 85 percent of the people against it. The real number? 91 percent of the American populace is against this war. And if you have a number that high, you can bet that the top 30 to 40 percent are rabidly opposed to this war.

If America really is still a democratic republic, numbers like these are a death sentence to those in office

There is no way the Israeli lobby or any zionist front could ever convince the elected leaders of a nation to act against numbers this strong. I believe that there is a very high probability that the American government is behaving belligerently because it has been placed under threat. And if such a threat is in place, it’s probably WAR ON.

Nuclear Blackmail outlines how Brazil, Germany, Japan, and America have been placed under threat after getting security contracts with the same Mossad front that destroyed Fukushima. This was accomplished by getting gun type nuclear weapons into the facility poorly disguised as stereoscopic cameras.

Magna BSP’s Owl clearly explains how reactor 4 exploded without a core at all while the fuel pool remained intact, which makes reactor 4 Fukushima’s building 7

But it’s not just nuke cameras that are the issue when it comes to Israel, and it is not just Magna BSP

Sweden is also now under the threat of nuclear blackmail, with it’s largest nuclear facility rigged to explode if they do not live up to Israeli threats and it did not even take a nuke camera to accomplish it.

But wait, there is more

With the absense of helium 3 around the world, many nations can no longer protect their ports so a nuclear threat can be brought into any nation now, EXCEPT ISRAEL AND PERHAPS RUSSIA AND CHINA, disguised as any object. And what objects won’t ever be tampered with? What objects will be put in place and left there untouched for years? What objects are there around the world that are placed in safe locations that are highly prominent and smack dab in the middle of large government oriented cities, that will never be demolished and take enormous public approval to have moved or removed?

ANSWER: Works of art. You can’t have a butt ugly Magna BSP owl put just anywhere but you SURE can have a butt ugly spider.

And the body is not even that of a spider, it looks perfectly shaped to house an implosion nuke. I am not saying these spiders which are popping up everywhere have nukes in them, but I will say they would make prime candidates. First of all, it’s an ugly object of dread anyway. Second of all, these are placed in the most prime locations for nuclear weapons to go off. And thirdly, I can’t think of any city that would actually want to have an image like this in a highly prominent location, who cares if the artist was famous, these spiders in fact do not really belong anywhere.

“The Mother spider?” Yeah right. Why not instead use a nice looking argiope orb weaver, or something else, even a black widow? Try to identify any spider body parts on that thing other than the legs, it’s not even a spider. It is not something made out of respect for anything it is supposed to represent, it is instead a horrendous image of dread and that would work perfect for the psychological aspect of having it be something that could destroy the city around it.

After retrieving these images off the web, I typed “mother spider nuke” into Google, and the entire topic went dead. I do not know if my computers are rigged to trigger Google or what, but I could no longer get pictures, anything related to Burgeois, the locations they were placed, I could get NADA, google totally went blind on the topic of this spider. HMMMMMM. Interesting indeed, and fortunately I had looked into these spiders fairly well before typing that. A smoking gun? Maybe, maybe not, but the main point is that works of art would be prime for concealing a nuclear threat right out in the open, in front of the public.

I wanted to make sure this spider could house a nuke before I mentioned this, and managed to get my hands on a photo shot with a really good SLR. This allowed me to process the photo to bring out the shadow detail and see if you could see up inside the spider through the egg sack. Answer? you can’t, it is all sealed off.


It sure would not take a demon spider to make that scenario happen, all it would take is a few rogues in the nuclear trail. I could not find out if South Carolina has a spider or not because Google and other search engines blanked the topic on the computer I was using to search this subject out. Since there are only 30 or so of these spiders around the world so far, with more going into major cities rapidly now, I doubt South Carolina has one and if it does it would not match the infowars scenario anyway. And once again, I have received no information about these spiders with regard to nukes, I am only saying that their locations, appearances and relative newness are highly suspicious from a perspective of nuclear blackmail and that with the absense of helium 3 and Israel having no moral compass whatsoever, as well as an inability to launch ballistic nukes due to their political location, getting nukes into works of art would be absolutely prime.

I can only hope that bringing up the topic of Nuclear Blackmail will cause Israel to BACK OFF if this is the case. After all, if Americans really are in a position to oust their government via fair elections that are not rigged via totally un accountable electronic voting machines, (which is in doubt but worth mentioning the possibility of), and those same Americans oppose the war 91 – 9, ANY support of this war on Syria amounts to political suicide and makes the prospect of nuclear blackmail all the more probable.

A version of this article was first published on

SABROSKY: Endgame In The Syrian Crisis

Obama’s “interesting times” (in the sense of the ancient Chinese curse) are upon him.

By Dr. Alan Sabrosky*

President Obama will address the nation on Tuesday to make his case for action in Syria, as Congress returns from summer recess. He is up against an overwhelming majority not only at home, but also in the international community.

The latest and most dangerous phase in the Syrian civil war began with a chemical attack on a residential neighborhood of Damascus during the night of August 21, 2013. That a chemical attack of some kind took place was quickly self-evident. What was not were the casualties, ranging from an estimate in the low hundreds to a preposterously precise 1,429 – a number the US government seemed to accept without reservation, even though none of the groups reporting it could substantiate. 

Opening Moves

What was interesting was the rapidity with which the US and many other Western governments accepted without question the complicity of the Syrian government in the attack, even though no one to my knowledge has ever indicated just why that government –- which is finally winning its civil war -– would effectively snatch defeat from the jaws of victory by doing something so self-defeating, for no discernible military or political purpose.

At least as interesting was the unwillingness of the US and its allies to officially consider the possibility that one or more of the rebel groups (there being so single unified rebel command) might itself have made the attack, simply to precipitate outside intervention and avert defeat. Unlike the Syrian government, which had nothing to gain and everything to lose from such an atrocity, the rebels –- all of them –- had everything to gain and nothing to lose. Compounding this exercise in official self-deception or duplicity (the latter more likely) was a great reluctance on the part of official Washington to acknowledge publicly the brutal character of all sides in this civil war, and the unpleasant fact that the Syrian opposition included elements of Al-Qaeda –- supposedly our great enemy in the misbegotten “global war on terror” for twelve years, but in Syria the indirect recipient of weapons, training and other assistance from the US and others.

Middle Game

The crisis quickly assumed a military nature, with many in the Obama administration and others declaring that this atrocity required some type of punitive action for a variety of reasons. As at the beginning, the action was consistently attributed to the Syrian government without a shred of hard evidence of that, other than the identification of the chemical used as Sarin, something readily available on the clandestine international arms market as well as from many intelligence agencies – just as (e.g.) the US CIA provided sophisticated “Stinger” SAMs to Afghan insurgents fighting the USSR. The principal military option discussed was using naval and air forces to launch cruise missiles against selected Syrian targets from a distance, presumably in a limited strike (whatever “limited” means in a practical sense) without any need for ground troops to be introduced. President Obama’s speech on July 31, 2013 declaring both his intention to strike Syria and his referral of that action to the Congress for its endorsement, seemed to set everything in motion.

Something of this type had been in the making for some time, awaiting only a useful provocation, real or contrived. For two decades, the US has been working its way around the Middle East, beating up on Israel’s enemies, with Syria and Iran bringing the two remaining outliers in late 2013. In this context, an attack on Syria would be sort of a “consolation prize” for Israel, which wants both Syria and Iran hit, but would like more to see Iran taken out –- an attack on Syria perhaps opening the way for one later on Iran. It seems that the Obama administration expected active support from a number of traditional US allies, especially in NATO. And Obama genuinely appears to have thought that Congressional approval would be a “done deal,” once he had the leadership of both parties in both houses on board — and he got that quickly — with AIPAC doing a full-court press telling the Hill just how important it was to Israel that the US do this.

Things didn’t work out that way. Britain’s Parliament voted against participating in a military strike against Syria, thus depriving the US of its most steadfast past ally and the legitimizer of so many of its military interventions. Only a handful of other countries expressed support for the US position. Russia and China adamantly opposed the use of force against Syria and dismissed what the US government called “evidence” as “nonsense,” which made it effectively impossible for the US to go to the United Nations for support.

I have nonetheless been intrigued by the White House’s portrayal of its refusal to go to the UN Security Council because that body is supposedly hamstrung by a Russian veto, for three reasons: First, it would not be only Russia but also China, with Britain abstaining and only France backing the US, among the permanent members. Second, even without the veto, the US would lose — and lose badly — in a straight majority vote, given the declared positions on an attack on Syria voiced by the 10 non-permanent members of the UNSC. And third, the US position is something between laughable and pitiful, given the dozens of times it has used its own veto to shield Israel — many times on 14-to-1 votes, with all of our allies against it. The US position is essentially akin to a thief crying out, “I wuz robbed!”

Even worse news for Obama came from the public and from Capitol Hill. No one anticipated the huge groundswell in public opposition to an attack on Syria by the US virtually alone, and that opposition spanned the political and partisan spectrum. Every single senator and representative was deluged with emails, phone calls & office visits by their constituents, sometimes running 10-to-1 against the resolution. The leadership in the Congress had all said that a vote on this resolution was a “conscience issue,” which meant that there would be, and could be, no attempt to impose party discipline (even as that is defined loosely in the US). And an especially devastating public relations blow came on September 5, 2013, when the New York Times carried a front-page story of rebel atrocities with a graphic picture, and the major TV news services covered that story all day and the next – making “are those the barbarians Obama wants us to support?” a compelling and all but unanswerable question.

End Game 

The effect of this decision, plus an unusual degree of public input into the process and adverse media publicity, is crushing to Administration hopes for Congressional support. The latest “head count” on Capitol Hill has a majority (246) of the Representatives voting “no” or leaning that way with 161 more undecided, and only 217 votes “no” are needed to kill the Syria war resolution. The Senate has 33 “no” or leaning that way and only 25 in favor, with 42 undecided — but their 41 “no” votes suffice to keep the measure from being put to a vote.

Moreover, this has also turned unintentionally into a test case of how Americans and the Congress react when the dynamic shifts from “this [Iranian nuclear ambitions, Syrian chemical munitions — forget for now the veracity of both] is bad and something needs to be done” to “it is bad and we alone, or mostly so, will deal with it.”

Both Israel and its lobby here cannot like what is unfolding, because absent UN endorsement and a cobbled-together coalition, a large majority of the public and therefore members at least of the House of Representatives are saying, in effect, “hell, no, we won’t go.”

One way or the other, what happens will be settled within two weeks or less. A “no” from the Congress after the very public position Obama has taken would be politically catastrophic for him. This is not a parliamentary system. If he acceded, he would stand as a fool; if he attacked anyway, he would be impeached and his agenda in ruins.

Complicating things internationally, within 10 days, if news reports are correct, several additional Russian warships — including a powerful missile cruiser named the Moskva — will reach the Eastern Mediterranean, as will at least one Chinese warship now transiting the Red Sea (there are some reports of others, including at least one submarine, but I cannot say for certain). Probably the only possible “out” for Obama is a Russian proposal for Syria to relinquish its chemical munitions under international supervision, which might be the straw Obama grabs to avert other and (for him politically, at least) far worse alternatives.

So here is how it is shaping up as we enter the end game. Obama simply has to avoid a crushing “no” vote in the House of Representatives and nothing better than stalemate in the Senate, or his political goose is cooked & carved for dinner the remainder of his time in office.

So does he declare defeat in advance of the vote? I doubt it. Does he accept the Russian proposal? I hope so, because the only alternative left is a strike before Congress votes, and especially before Russian and Chinese warships assemble off Syria, after which he cannot attack without courting absolute disaster or humiliation if those warships simply shot down the incoming cruise missiles, which would have to pass over the warships en route to targets in Syria — and what could be more humiliating to Obama than to order a missile strike launched that then went missing? So any attack would have to come on or immediately after the 9/11 memorials to rally support or at least to mute opposition, a dicey proposition at best. Obama’s “interesting times” (in the sense of the ancient Chinese curse) are upon him.

Dr. Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D, University of Michigan) is a ten-year US Marine Corps veteran and a 1986 graduate of the US Army War College. He can be contacted at


Ben Bernanke sends 5 members of Congress thank-you letters

America’s top Jewish thief Ben Bernanke sent thank-you letters to five members of Congress for their part in securing that the Federal Reserve would suffer no audit, and that no laws would be enacted making an audit mandatory for the private central bank.

The five traitors in Congress who received thank-you letters:

Barney Frank

Elijah Cummings

Melvin Watt

Carolyn Maloney

Steny Hoyer

Wal-Mart vs. the Morons

WW~Notes:  A family member forwarded this email rant today and it struck just the right chord so I’m sharing it with all my readers.  Enjoy and I do have a postscript remark.

Americans… Democrats, Republicans, EVERYONE!!

Wal-Mart vs. the Morons

1. Americans spend $36,000,000 at Wal-Mart every hour of every day.

2. This works out to $20,928 profit every minute!

3. Wal-Mart will sell more from January 1st to St. Patrick’s Day (March 17th) than Target sells all year.

4. Wal-Mart is bigger than Home Depot + Kroger + Target +Sears + Costco + K-Mart combined.

5. Wal-Mart employs 1.6 million people; is the world’s largest private employer, and most speak English.

6. Wal-Mart is the largest company in the history of the world.

7. Wal-Mart now sells more food than Kroger and Safeway combined, and keep in mind they did this in only fifteen years.

8. During this same period 31 big supermarket chains sought bankruptcy.

9. Wal-Mart now sells more food than any other store in the world.

10. Wal-Mart has approx 3,900 stores in the USA of which 1,906 are Super Centers; this is 1,000 more than it had five years ago.

11. This year 7.2 billion different purchasing experiences will occur at Wal-Mart stores. (Earth’s population is approximately 6.5 Billion.)

12. 90% of all Americans live within fifteen miles of a Wal-Mart.

You may think that I am complaining, but I am really laying the ground work for suggesting that MAYBE we should hire the guys who run Wal-Mart to fix the economy.

This should be read and understood by all Americans… Democrats, Republicans, EVERYONE!!

To President Obama and all 535 voting members of the Legislature –

It is now official that most of you are corrupt morons:

a.. The U.S. Postal Service was established in 1775.  You had 234 years to get it right and it is broke.

b.. Social Security was established in 1935. You had 74 years to get it right and it is broke.

c.. Fannie Mae was established in 1938.  You had 71 years to get it right and it is broke.

d.. War on Poverty started in 1964. You had 45 years to get it right; $1 trillion of our money is confiscated each year and transferred to “the poor” and they only want more.

e.. Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965.  You have had 44 years to get it right and they are both broke.

f.. Freddie Mac was established in 1970.  You have had 39 years to get it right and it is broke.

g.. The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen our dependence on foreign oil.  It has ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget of $24 billion a year and we import more oil than ever before.  You had 32 years to get it right and it is an abysmal failure.

You have FAILED in every “government service” you have shoved down our throats while overspending our tax dollars.


We have lost our minds to “Political Correctness” !!!!!!!!!!!!

Someone please tell me what’s wrong with the people that run this country?????

We’re “broke” & can’t help our own Seniors, Veterans, Orphans, Homeless etc.,?????

But – in the last several months we have provided aid to Haiti , Chile, and Turkey..  and now Pakistan ……..literally, BILLIONS of DOLLARS!!! 

Our retired seniors living on a ‘fixed income’ receive no aid nor do they get any  breaks…

AMERICA: a country where we have homeless without shelter, children going to bed hungry, elderly going without ‘needed’ meds, and mentally ill without treatment.


Imagine if the *GOVERNMENT* gave ‘US’ the same support they give to other countries.  Sad isn’t it?

99% won’t have the guts to say anything.

I’m of the 1% — and I Just Did.

Folks, keep this circulating.  It is very well stated.  Maybe it will end up in the E-mails of some of our “duly elected’ (they never read anything) and their staff will clue them in on how Americans feel.

Author: unknown

WW~Postscript: Whoever wrote this rant left a wide open door with which to comment on what’s wrong with the country and the morons running it.  Of course, those running it are not morons, on the contrary.  They know exactly what they are doing and why and for whom.  And it ain’t for us, but I guess you all got that – right??  One need not look any further than the local freemasonic lodge and the neighborhood synagogue in Washington, D.C. for the culprits. 

Laser Scanners and the end of privacy

Hidden Government Scanners Will Instantly Know Everything About You From 164 Feet Away


Within the next year or two, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security will instantly know everything about your body, clothes, and luggage with a new laser-based molecular scanner fired from 164 feet (50 meters) away. From traces of drugs or gun powder on your clothes to what you had for breakfast to the adrenaline level in your body—agents will be able to get any information they want without even touching you.

And without you knowing it.

The technology is so incredibly effective that, in November 2011, its inventors were subcontracted by In-Q-Tel to work with the US Department of Homeland Security. In-Q-Tel is a company founded “in February 1999 by a group of private citizens at the request of the Director of the CIA and with the support of the U.S. Congress.” According to In-Q-Tel, they are the bridge between the Agency and new technology companies.

Their plan is to install this molecular-level scanning in airports and border crossings all across the United States. The official, stated goal of this arrangement is to be able to quickly identify explosives, dangerous chemicals, or bioweapons at a distance.

The machine is ten million times faster—and one million times more sensitive—than any currently available system. That means that it can be used systematically on everyone passing through airport security, not just suspect or randomly sampled people.

Analyzing everything in real time

But the machine can sniff out a lot more than just explosives, chemicals and bioweapons. The company that invented it, Genia Photonics, says that its laser scanner technology is able to “penetrate clothing and many other organic materials and offers spectroscopic information, especially for materials that impact safety such as explosives and pharmacological substances.” [PDF]

Formed in Montreal in 2009 by PhDs with specialties in lasers and fiber optics, Genia Photonics has 30 patents on this technology, claiming incredible biomedical and industrial applications—from identifying individual cancer cells in a real-time scan of a patient, to detecting trace amounts of harmful chemicals in sensitive manufacturing processes.

Hidden Government Scanners Will Instantly Know Everything About You From 164 Feet AwayAbove: The Genia Photonics’ Picosecond Programmable Laser scanner is capable of detecting every tiny trace of any substance on your body, from specks of gunpowder to your adrenaline levels to a sugar-sized grain of cannabis to what you had for breakfast.

Meanwhile, In-Q-Tel states that “an important benefit of Genia Photonics’ implementation as compared to existing solutions is that the entire synchronized laser system is comprised in a single, robust and alignment-free unit that may be easily transported for use in many environments… This compact and robust laser has the ability to rapidly sweep wavelengths in any pattern and sequence.” [PDF]

So not only can they scan everyone. They would be able to do it everywhere: the subway, a traffic light, sports events… everywhere.

How does it work?

The machine is a mobile, rack-mountable system. It fires a laser to provide molecular-level feedback at distances of up to 50 meters in just picoseconds. For all intents and purposes, that means instantly.

The small, inconspicuous machine is attached to a computer running a program that will show the information in real time, from trace amounts of cocaine on your dollar bills to gunpowder residue on your shoes. Forget trying to sneak a bottle of water past security—they will be able to tell what you had for breakfast in an instant while you’re walking down the hallway.

The technology is not new, it’s just millions times faster and more convenient than ever before. Back in 2008, a team at George Washington University developed a similar laser spectrometer using a different process. It could sense drug metabolites in urine in less than a second, trace amounts of explosive residue on a dollar bill, and even certain chemical changes happening in a plant leaf.

And the Russians also have a similar technology: announced last April, their “laser sensor can pick up on a single molecule in a million from up to 50 meters away.”

So if Genia Photonics’ claims pan out, this will be an incredible leap forward in terms of speed, portability, and convenience. One with staggering implications.

Observation without limits

There has so far been no discussion about the personal rights and privacy issues involved. Which “molecular tags” will they be scanning for? Who determines them? What are the threshold levels of this scanning? If you unknowingly stepped on the butt of someone’s joint and are carrying a sugar-sized grain of cannabis like that unfortunate traveler currently in jail in Dubai, will you be arrested?

And, since it’s extremely portable, will this technology extend beyone the airport or border crossings and into police cars, with officers looking for people on the street with increased levels of adrenaline in their system to detain in order to prevent potential violent outbursts? And will your car be scanned at stoplights for any trace amounts of suspicious substances? Would all this information be recorded anywhere?

Hidden Government Scanners Will Instantly Know Everything About You From 164 Feet AwayAbove: A page from a Genia Photonics paper describing its ability to even penetrate through clothing.

There are a lot of questions with no answer yet, but it’s obvious that the potential level of personal invasion of this technology goes far beyond that of body scans, wiretaps, and GPS tracking.

The end of privacy coming soon

According to the undersecretary for science and technology of the Department of Homeland Security, this scanning technology will be ready within one to two years, which means you might start seeing them in airports as soon as 2013.

In other words, these portable, incredibly precise molecular-level scanning devices will be cascading lasers across your body as you walk from the bathroom to the soda machine at the airport and instantly reporting and storing a detailed breakdown of your person, in search of certain “molecular tags”.

Going well beyond eavesdropping, it seems quite possible that U.S. government plans on recording molecular data on travelers without their consent, or even knowledge that it’s possible—a scary thought. While the medical uses could revolutionize the way doctors diagnose illness, and any technology that could replace an aggressive pat-down is tempting, there’s a potential dark side to this implementation, and we need to shine some light on it before it’s implemented.

The author of this story is currently completing his PhD in renewable energy solutions, focusing on converting waste to energy in the urban environment. Even while most of this information is publicly available, he wanted to remain anonymous.

Image by oleandra/Shutterstock


Clueless Congressman, Pete Stark, “The Federal Government can do most anything in this country”

Is It Time For Revolution?

By Rev. Ted Pike
1 Mar 10

Joseph Stack was an angry accountant who expressed his protest of the IRS by becoming an aerial firebomb, hurtling his plane into Austin’s IRS building. His suicide note—“Violence not only is the answer, it is the only answer”— perfectly expressed the fiery sentiments of the majority of talk radio callers to whom I recently spoke. This past week I went back on the radio to try to stir up calls against the Anti-Defamation League’s new public school hate crimes bill, the Student Nondiscrimination Act, HR 4530. I encouraged tens of thousands to protest to the House Education and Labor Committee where this bill is being considered. I discovered a shocking new mood in heartland America: fury and widespread determination to end liberal tyranny in Washington but not by phoning Congress. Increasingly, violent revolution is the solution for some.

You can listen to my interview with Rick Adams. For an hour and a half, the phone lines are jammed largely by callers enthralled with the possibility of “watering the tree of liberty” through bloody revolution. They hope this might bring the national salvation which has eluded us. (Listen to the broadcast HERE)

I encountered the same mood on other programs. The common belief is that, since Washington will not heed the will of the people, we must “punish” the government by no longer talking to it (in other words, calling Congress in protest.) Since the government has mocked the will of the people, various forms of non-cooperation, isolation and even violent insurrection are all that is left for us.

As a result, out of my nearly eight hours of intense pleas for action, heard on at least 70 radio stations slanted to the right, fewer than 70 people came to our website for the list of names to call! Evidently, even the perverse and frightening objective of the Student Nondiscrimination Act—to establish the federal government as the pro-homosexual educator and punisher of Christian opponents of homosexuality in American public schools—can’t rouse many people to call the politicians who will decide whether it goes forward.

Useless to call Congress?

Disheartened and desperate conservatives, largely in the tea party movement, think Congress is now impervious to the will of grassroots America. But an important clarification must be made. The government is not necessarily our enemy. America’s primary adversary is the agenda of very powerful lobbying groups—primarily Zionist and secular Jewish groups led by the Anti-Defamation League and assisted by the homosexual lobby. These forcefully pressure and often work together with our leaders, from President Obama to members of the House and Senate.

Orthodox rabbi Nachum Shifren, in his unprecedented expose of the power and globalist aspirations of the ADL, confirms that secular Judaism, the dominant form of Judaism in America, spearheads this agenda. (See Shifren’s article The ADL vs. Faith and Freedom) The red-button issues most promoted by the American secular Jewish community include homosexual rights, immigration and healthcare “reform,” abortion rights, national financial bailouts, support of Israel’s occupation of Gaza, and wars to make the Mideast safe for Israel—including possible attack of Iran. ADL epitomizes secular world Jewry and is a prolific and untiring fountain of freedom-destroying legislation, including state, federal, and international hate laws. We almost invariably find ever increasing numbers of Jewish Senators and House members either introducing or promoting the latest ADL-engendered legislative poison. Their ranks are vastly disproportionate to the 1-2% presence of Jews in the American population.

The problem of government “insensitivity” is thus largely synonymous with the fact that liberal, secular Jewish supremacy is deeply entrenched in our nation’s capitol, promoting its anti-Christian, un-American agenda. Some Republicans, but especially Democrats, are overtly complicit with this Zionist Occupied Government (ZOG). All are heavily pressured to support issues of which the Zionists will admit no compromise. Dissent means political ruin by the vengeful, all powerful Jewish lobby, including Jewish-dominated big media (See Jews Confirm Big Media Is Jewish).

The focus of tea party and right-wing anger, demonizing “the government,” is thus both simplistic and misdirected.

It is foolish to “punish” Congress by refusing to talk to it! The secular Jews and liberals running Congress would actually be delighted to be left alone to create a dictatorship oppressing us all. Are we going to give them what they want? Or will we make their road to tyranny as rough as possible through incessant telephone criticism when and where it is needed? Rep. Steve King says the most effective way to hold back the liberal legislative agenda is by calling, at the critical moment, members of those pivotal committees that decide which legislation dies or advances. This is the critical moment to destroy the Student Nondiscrimination Act, HR 4530 in the House Education and Labor Committee. Find the names, especially of Republicans, of members of this committee (find them on our Action page here) and call toll-free 1-877-851-6437, toll 1-202-225-3121. Also read and widely circulate my recent article on HR 4530, “ADL’s New Public School Hate Bill.”

Victories for Freedom in 2009

Has the ability of the people to impact Congress really gone the way of the dinosaur? It’s true, concerning financial bailout and healthcare reform, the Democrat Congress has not revealed a sincerely listening ear. But even though the hate bill became law, the people scored several powerful victories against hate crime legislation in this Congress. Even though it took a lot of urging from National Prayer Network, calls of protest against the hate bill finally soared just before its passage, even exceeding calls about the Sotomayor hearings and healthcare. Democrats in the Senate were terrified and quickly added the previously rejected Brownback amendment to the present hate law, strengthening protection from possible federal prosecution for pastors, talk show hosts, and authors. Last fall, Americans’ phone calls did even more. They stopped dead in their tracks ADL’s cyber-bullying and AWARE bills, which would federalize prosecution of those who criticize homosexuality in American public schools and establish massive pro-homosexual public education. This happened because patriots, again alerted by the National Prayer Network, flooded the Judiciary committee with protest. This outpouring encouraged Rep. Louie Gohmert in particular to assemble a cast of top-flight Constitutional and conservative experts to argue against these bills.

Despite the big talk of revolution, there is little possibility for successful military insurrection for a long time to come. The real danger now is that through violence unstable people or groups may give ADL, the Department of Homeland Security, liberal media and Obama Democrats exactly what they want: confirmation that the tea party and far right are not only potential but actual domestic terrorists. The government response will be martial law, oppressive directives and legislation much further stripping us of freedom.

Today, the telephone remains our strongest weapon. Some in the right may vie for the honor of firing what they believe will be “the shot heard round the world,” precipitating a revolution that will solve America’s problems. Actually, such violent fanaticism would give the most powerful enemies of freedom the opportunity they lust for. It would reverberate in the clang of thousands of prison cells throughout this land.


Rev. Ted Pike on Rick Adams show –

Hour One

Hour Two

How Zionists Occupy Two Nations: America and Palestine


by Mohamed Khodr

too_much_zionismFrom America’s “Jewish Triangle” to Iraqi’s “Sunni Triangle
Government Job Notice:  No Gentiles Need Apply

“The Modern Age is the Jewish Age, and the twentieth century, in particular, is the Jewish Century.”

–Yuri Slezkine, Professor of History at University of California, Berkeley, “The Jewish Century”; Princeton University Press (Russian Jewish immigrant to the U.S.)

No, America, there is no Zionist Conspiracy running our nation; just well funded organized Zionist Coincidences

From Truman, to Clinton, to Obama, to…..

In a Nov. 10, 1945 meeting with American diplomats brought in from their posts in the Middle East to urge Truman not to heed Zionist urgings to recognize Israel, Truman bluntly explained his motivation:

I’m sorry, gentlemen, but I have to answer to hundreds of thousands who are anxious for the success of Zionism: I do not have hundreds of thousands of Arabs among my constituents”

–Harry Truman, 33rd President

“Clinton drew applause for his own commitment to Israel when he stated that should the Iraqis ever cross over the Israeli border for aggression, “I would personally get in a ditch, grab a rifle, and fight and die.”

–President Bill Clinton, speaking at a Toronto Jewish Fund Raiser, July 30, 2002 ( (BUT he avoided fighting for America)

Sixty years after Truman’s recognition of Israel, the 44th President Elect of the United States, Barack Obama, in true allegiance to the Flag of Israel, continues the expected, no, the demanded subservience and pandering to America’s Zionists.

Four Examples of Obama’s Allegiance to Israel at the expense of our national interest in the Middle East.  This man of “hope” is nevertheless “hopelessly” devoted to Israel.

1.  “Obama Asks Shimon Peres (President of Israel)What can I do for Israel?”

–Haaretz, November 17, 2008

2.   Obama’s Letter to President Bush on Israel, June 25, 2008

“A fundamental principle of America’s Middle East policy must be our unshakable commitment to Israel’s security. I believe that is a bipartisan commitment and I will work to continue and advance that consensus. …The Arab states should support the Palestinians and prepare their own people for peace by making gestures of normalization toward Israel.”

(OBAMA is uninformed: The Arab League did offer just such a Peace Plan to Israel three times, 1981, 2002, 2007); but Israel rejected it each time.

3.  Obama’s conference call with 900 U.S. Jewish Rabbis:  September 18, 2008 (

The senator spoke of his recent trip to Israel, and reaffirmed personal commitment to Israel’s security, calling it sacrosanct: “I think that it’s also important to recognize that throughout my career in the State Legislature and now in the US Senate I have been a stalwart friend of Israel. On every single issue related to Israel’s security, I have been unwavering, and will continue to be unwavering….”My belief is that Israel’s security is sacrosanct and we have to ensure that as the sole democracy in the Middle East, one of our greatest allies in the world, one that shares a special relationship with us and shares our values, we have to make sure that they have the support whether its financial or military to sustain their security and the hostile environment.”

As with all American politicians, Obama made the requisite pilgrimage to Israel to pay homage to the great democracy living in a constant existential threat from its impotent, incompetent, weak, illiterate, unproductive, and failed Arab neighbors, as well as his more important pledge of allegiance to AIPAC where political careers are made or destroyed.   The path to the White House or Congress goes through AIPAC.

4.  Obama’s Speech to AIPAC, March 2, 2007

And I can tell you that as a candidate for the president of the United States and as a president of the United States, I vow to work as diligently and as consistently and as determinedly as possible with AIPAC and with the Great State of Israel to bring that vision about.”

–Obama’s Speech at AIPAC, March 2, 2007:  Read full text to see the full fledged love fest replete with the lies, myths, and clichés provided by AIPAC to all political cowards and hypocrites seeking office.

Mr. Obama, you’re simply the last in a long line of American politicians who’ve never taken notice of Israel’s true contempt of the only “friend” it has in the entire world.  Without our recognition, support and hundreds of billions of tax dollars of aid (Israel is the world’s 16th richest nation), there would be no Israel.   Beware of Israel’s rabid bite of the hand that feeds it.

“Our American friends offer us money, arms, and advice. We take the money, we take the arms, and we decline the advice.
–Moshe Dayan, America’s hero of the 1967 Preemptive attack on Arab nations

When, in all our history, has anyone with ideas so bizarre, so archaic, so self-confounding, so remote from the basic American consensus, ever got so far? —Richard Hofstadter

Israel and its Jewish supporters around the world navigate the paradox oxymoronic paradigm between their boastful pride of Jewish “tribal” power that wields enormous political, economic, and military might around the world—the power to invade, massacre, occupy foreign lands at will with total impunity and immunity from world action; a power to silence and intimidate world governments, none more so than the “wag the tail superpower”, America; and between milking the image of eternal victimhood, weakness, and s constant existential threat by a hate filled hostile world; a world genetically born and inbred with “Anti-Semitism”.

While in reality Israel is the military occupier and slum lord of Palestine, Southern Lebanon’s Shebaa farms, and Syria’s Golan Heights.   It possesses between 200 – 300 nuclear weapons while Arabs/Iran have none.  It has the second most powerful air force in the world (after the U.S.).   It is the fourth largest exporter of military weapons and possesses the world’s latest spy technology including access to all U.S. Spy intelligence.

It has the might to destroy the entire world should it come under a doomsday attack.

’Prime Minister Golda Meir also told me, on-the-record during the course of an interview I did with her for the BBC’s Panorama programme, that in a doomsday situation Israel would be prepared to take the region and the whole world down with it. (Her full quote with its context is as set down on page xii of Waiting for the Apocalypse, the Prologue to Volume One of Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews).

–Alan Hart, ICH, June 8, 2008.  Mr. Hart was a BBC correspondent, an author, his latest:  “Zionism:  The Real Enemy of the Jews”, Vol. 1 and 2, and a researcher.

BUT, it is also the little victim that maybe extinguished by its “bad neighbors”.

Looking at Zionism without taboos means seeing the hard reality of the domination and oppression it has created.  Out of the original sins of the world against the Jews grew the original sins of Zionism against the Palestinians.”

–Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi, “Original Sins”;  An Israeli Scholar at Haifa University (Israel) and author of:

“The Israeli Connection:  Who Israel Arms and Why”

“The war’s seventh day, which began on June 12, 1967 (Six Day War) , and has continued to this day, is the product of our choice.  We enthusiastically chose to become a colonial society, ignoring international treaties, expropriating lands, transferring settlers from Israel to the occupied territories, engaging in theft and finding justifications for all these activities.  Passionately desiring to keep the occupied territories we developed two judicial systems:   One—-progressive, liberal—in Israel; and the Other—cruel, injurious—-in the occupied territories.  In effect, we established an APARTHEID regime in the occupied territories immediately after their capture.  That oppressive regime exists to this day.”

–Michael Ben-Yar, Israeli Attorney General in Yitzhak Rabin’s government in mid 1990’s.

(Quoted in “Herzl’s Nightmare, One Land, Two Peoples” by Peter Rodgers, former Australian Ambassador to Israel, pg. 32 – 33)

“What struck me most about the biblical narrative was that the divine promise of land was integrally linked with the mandate to exterminate the indigenous peoples, and I had to wrestle with my perception that those traditions were inherently oppressive and morally reprehensible….It was some shock to realize that the narrative presents “ethnic cleansing” as not only legitimate, but as required by the deity….By modern standards of international law and human rights, what these biblical narratives mandate are “war crimes” and “crimes against humanity…Was there a way of reading the traditions which could rescue the Bible from being a blunt instrument of oppression, and acquit God of the charge of being the Great Ethnic-Cleanser?

–Dr. Michael Prior, C.M., “Confronting the Bible’s Ethnic Cleansing In Palestine”; The Link, December 2000 (Americans for Middle East Understanding.

Dr. Prior is Professor of Biblical Studies in the University of Surrey, England, and visiting professor in Bethlehem University, Palestine.  He is a biblical scholar and author of “Zionism and the State of Israel: A Moral Inquiry” and “The Bible and Colonialism: A Moral Critique.”

World Jewry constitutes 0.0019% of the world’s population and less then two percent of the U.S. population.   But despite their very small numbers they are without a doubt the richest, most educated, successful, organized, ambitious and motivated tribe in the world.   Their intelligence, brilliance, and high education have given the world its most creative thinkers, inventors, artists, physicians, writers, and Noble Prize winners.   The world owes a great deal to world Jewry for the enormous contributions they’ve made to this world.   They’ve been in the forefront of civil rights, liberal causes, and justice.

No one should begrudge the extraordinary success and accomplishments of Jewish Americans.  They worked hard and deserve the respect and admiration of all Americans.

BUT, and here’s the really big rub—organized Jewry has translated their enormous “Jewish Power” of wealth, political activism, media, Hollywood, and industry dominance to ensure that our government is willfully complicity in supporting Israel’s persecution of the Palestinians, refugees on their own land (living on only 18% of their original Palestine) while Israel defies all divine and human laws against its barbaric treatment and occupation of millions of Palestinians.

It is this “Jewish Power/Israel Lobby” that the entire world must have the courage to publicly and forcefully condemn and do all things necessary, sooner rather than later, to end its power and put Israel in its place.

Only when the western governments are free from the albatross of the Israel Lobby will Palestine, the Middle East and the Muslim world be free to cohabit this world in peace and good relations with the West.

Ending Israel’s political and military terrorism will end Muslim terrorism.

In Middle East politics:

Israel manipulates America—America manipulates Arab Dictators—therefore Israel manipulates Arab Dictators.

For almost twenty months Israel, with the full knowledge and support of our U.S. government, has besieged the lives and land of Gaza.  Today Gaza is slowly dying without food, water, medicines, fuel, electricity and oxygen for its premature infants and sick elderly.   Surgeons don’t have the lights, medicines, or equipment to remove the bullets and shrapnel from Palestinian children courtesy of the American taxpayer and Israeli soldiers.  Poverty, mass unemployment, malnutrition, and disease are rampant in Gaza but thanks to decades of a Jewish dominated U.S. media that has dehumanized Palestinians, their lives are not newsworthy, easily ignored and deletable from western consciousness.   The only useful purpose Palestinian children serve is as target practice for the training of new Israeli soldiers.

The useless, incompetent, and inept Arab League lip syncs again to help the Palestinians while in reality their cry is —-with our souls, our blood, we sacrifice ourselves to thee O America.

Why are the Palestinians dying and suffering for decades amidst world silence?

Answer:   Jewish Power and the Israel Lobby:

Which includes the Armageddon pushing Christian Fundamentalists; an oxymoronic group of the followers of the prince of peace who seek a world holocaust against Non-Christians; but as long as they support Israel, organized U.S. Jewry will accept them as partners.

“His name is Yusuf Samir, and he is a reporter for the Israeli Arabic service. He tells us….”The Palestinians are animals,” he says. “They are less than human. They are savage beasts. Israel is a land of love. People in Israel love one another. But the Palestinians do not love. They hate. They should be destroyed. We should put fire to them. We should take back Beit Jala, Bethlehem, take back all the land and get rid of them.”

Children have been shot in other conflicts I have covered—death squads gunned them down in El Salvador and Guatemala, mothers with infants were lined up and massacred….Serb snipers put children in their sights and watched them crumple onto the pavement in Sarajevo—but I have never before watched soldiers entice children like mice into a trap and murder them for sport.

It was in Gaza, where I lived for weeks at a time during the seven years I spent in the Middle East, that I came to know the dark side of the Israeli Defense Force”.

–Chris Hedges (former New York Times Middle East Bureau Chief), “A Gaza Diary”; Harper’s Magazine; October 2001

In East Jerusalem, Israel continues the Judaization of the Holy City to three faiths.  As part of that official policy the Israeli police in an early morning raid on November 9 forcibly evicted Fawzia al-Kurd, 57, and her partially paralyzed wheel chair bound husband from their home of 52 years.   They couldn’t collect any possession and Fawzia’s was still wearing her pajamas upon their eviction.   Fawzia was forced to move into a tent while her very ill husband is living with relatives.    Not satisfied with just evicting and confiscating their home, the Israeli soldiers chased Fawzia to her make shift tent and destroyed that too.   Fawzia is cold, hungry, homeless and separated from her very ill husband.  Why?  According to Israel she set up the tent “without permission.”  This is the democracy we as Americans are paying and dying for in absolute ignorance and silence!

Note from Whitewraithe:

Abu Kamel of the al-Kurd family has died two weeks after Israel forcibly evicted him from his home of 52 years

Video of the Kurd family eviction  –


Only Israel of all nations can literally get away with murder.   As long as our government is held in the palms of the Israel Lobby; such murder is committed with regularity and impunity.

“New opinions often appear first as jokes and fancies, then as blasphemies and treason, then as questions open to discussion, and finally as established truths.” George Bernard Shaw

Thankfully, several prominent Jews have formed a new lobby, J Street, to oppose the influence of the Israel Lobby and its stranglehold on US foreign policy that emphasizes force over diplomacy.  J Street supports a peaceful negotiated settlement of the Israeli Palestinian conflict and the formation of two independent states although it avoids delineating the borders of such states; for example, by supporting the 1967 borders.

The Iraq War: The “Jewish/Israel Lobby” Triangle

No greater example of the power of the “The Israel Lobby” and the mainly Jewish cabal in the Bush administration than this nation being forced into an illegal, immoral, and destructive war, the Iraq War, that has bankrupted this nation and shed the blood of our youth while killing over a million Iraqi’s.    To this date and in our alleged democracy no one, not one single person, has been held accountable for this deliberately manufactured war and genocide against the innocent Iraqi’s; not for the lies, not for shredding our Constitutional system of government and guaranteed civil liberties, not for the trillions of wasted dollars, not for the rivers of blood, not for the torture, rape, murder, and crimes against humanity committed by the war criminals in Washington D.C. .  All will or have left office to better financial careers and future book and movie deals.

America has forgotten Abeer Qasim Hamza, a 14-year-old Iraqi girl, gang raped by five U.S. soldiers then shot in the head along with her parents and her five year old sister, Hadeel.   Abeer’s crime was that she was an Iraqi girl and a Muslim, thus fodder for the “liberators” for freedom.   She is dispensable trash as no doubt thousands of other Iraqi girls and women both in and out of prison.

American and Israeli soldiers can kill in cold blood and gang rape at will in their respective occupied territories and know they won’t face prosecution as they simply were carrying their actions in self defense and according to terms of “engagement”, which obviously includes rape.

Would our government, media, Hollywood, think tanks, business leaders have reacted differently if this was a Jewish girl gang raped in Syria or Iran?   Would there be hysterical cries for blood and wiping out the two nations?

When Daniel Pearl, Jewish journalist for the Wall Street Journal, was killed in Pakistan, the western media was in rage mode for weeks.   Hollywood further enshrined this incident with a movie, “A Mighty Heart” that received endless press.    However, most shockingly and as far as I know for the first time, our federal government provided free propaganda for this movie.

The Department of State, the nation’s premier diplomatic agency, had its tax funded website serve as a commercial billboard for this movie about a “Jewish” journalist.  It posted a three-part video discussion on Daniel Pearl’s murder and the capture of his killers on its home page under the title “The Daniel Pearl Murder: A First Person Account.”

In an article in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, “White Man’s Burden”, (May 4, 2003), Ari Shavit wrote:

The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history. ..Is the Iraq war the great neoconservative war? It’s the war the neoconservatives wanted, Friedman (Thomas Friedman of the New York Times) says. It’s the war the neoconservatives marketed… Oh boy, did they sell it. So this is not a war that the masses demanded. This is a war of an elite.  I could give you the names of 25 people (all of whom are at this moment within a five-block radius of this office) who, if you had exiled them to a desert island a year and a half ago, the Iraq war would not have happened.”

An overwhelming majority of political, economic, military experts in the U.S. and around the world have documented in print and interviews that the Pro Israel mainly Jewish Neocons pushed for this war.

With Iraq no threat, why invade a sovereign country? The answer: President Bush’s policy to secure Israel….You don’t come to town and announce your Israel policy is to invade Iraq”.

–Former Senator Ernest Hollings May 6, 2004 Charleston Post and Courier

“The lack of public discussion about the role of Israel in the thinking of “President Bush” is easier to understand, but weird nevertheless. It is the proverbial elephant in the room: Everybody sees it, no one mentions it. The reason is obvious and admirable: Neither supporters nor opponents of a war against Iraq wish to evoke the classic anti-Semitic image of the king’s Jewish advisers whispering poison into his ear and betraying the country to foreign interests.”

–Michael Kinsley (Jewish journalist), What Bush Isn’t Saying About Iraq. President Bush won’t discuss two big reasons he wants to invade Iraq”; Slate, October 24, 2002

They are the so-called neo-cons, or neo-conservatives. A compact group, almost all of whose members are Jewish. They hold the key positions in the Bush administration, as well as in the think-tanks that play an important role in formulating American policy and the op-ed pages of the influential newspapers….Seemingly; all this is good for Israel. America controls the world, we control America. Never before have Jews exerted such an immense influence on the center of world power”.

Uri Avnery, “The Night After”, Counterpunch, April 10, 2003 (Mr. Avnery is a former Israeli soldier and Knesset Member)

“Jews hold stunningly powerful positions and clout in the United States. The combination of the American state’s power and the Jewish power in the areas of legislation, administration, media, law, business, culture, and entertainment have made the Jews a defining factor of contemporary America. Because Israel is inseparable from the identity of American Jews, Israel is inseparable from the American experience.”

–Avraham Burg, in his book: “The Holocaust Is Over; We Must Rise From its Ashes”, (Oct. 2008) Served as Speaker of the Knesset, Israel’s Parliament, and Chair of the Jewish Agency and World Zionist Organization.

“How has the Zionist will been imposed on the American people?… It is the Jewish connection, the tribal solidarity among themselves and the amazing pull on non-Jews, that has molded this unprecedented power … The Jewish connection covers all areas and reaches every level. Most Americans may not even sense this gigantic effort, but there is scarcely a Jew who is not touched by its tentacles…The extent and depth to which organized Jewry reached – and reaches – in the U.S. is indeed awesome … The most effective component of the Jewish connection is probably that of media control …Jewish wealth and acumen wields unprecedented power in the area of finance and investment banking, playing an important role in influencing U.S. policy toward the Middle East … In the larger metropolitan areas, the Jewish-Zionist connection thoroughly pervades affluent financial, commercial, social, entertainment, and art circles.”

–Alfred  Lilienthal, The Zionist Connection (New York: Dodd, Mead, 1978), pp. 206, 209, 212, 218, 228, 229.

“We killed them out of a certain naive hubris.  Believing with absolute certitude that now, with the White House, the Senate, and much of the American media in our hands, the lives of others do not count as much as our own…”

–Ari Shavit, May 27, 1996 New York Times, (expressing sorrow and anger at Israel’s deliberate    massacre of over 100 Lebanese civilians under U.N. protection in Qana, Lebanon; April 1996)

Since the 1960s, Jews have come to wield considerable influence in American economic, cultural, intellectual and political life. Jews played a central role in American finance during the 1980s, and they were among the chief beneficiaries of that decade’s corporate mergers and reorganizations. Today, though barely two percent of the nation’s population is Jewish, close to half its billionaires are Jews. The chief executive officers of the three major television networks and the four largest film studios are Jews, as are the owners of the nation’s largest newspaper chain and the most influential single newspaper, the New York Times… The role and influence of Jews in American politics is equally marked.

—Benjamin Ginsberg, The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State (Univ. of Chicago, 1993), pp. 1, 103.

“The President of the United States, on issue after issue, has reflected the thinking of neoconservatives.”

– Richard Perle

This is NOT a discourse or criticism of Judaism or of Jews in general but of an elite of Jewish Americans who dominate the Tripartite triangle of power in this country, what is termed “Jewish Power”; centered in the triangle of Washington D.C. (Government); New York City (Financial/Banking Institutions), and Hollywood/Media.

Thus the power of the Jewish Triangle arising from their dominance in Government, the Financial/Banking Sector, and Hollywood/Media, forced this nation into a war of choice for the sake of Israel and Oil.

Coincidentally, Lieutenant General Jay Garner, a staunch supporter of Israel, was appointed after Iraq’s invasion in 2003 as Director of the Office for Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance, replaced later by Paul Bremer.

Harvard Professor of Law Noah Feldman (Jewish) was the man most responsible for writing Iraq’s constitution.

The most striking facet of the establishment Jewish American “elite” is their rotating political life cycle, playing musical chairs if you will, between top government positions and the private sector be it in business, academia, influential policy “think tanks”, the media and entertainment industry.   This has given the Israel Lobby enormous knowledge, insight, and leverage to singularly ensure America’s foreign policy is dominated by Israel’s interests.

Examples of Outrageous Arrogance of Power by Jewish Americans and the Israel Lobby:

“In October 1980, Thomas Dine, became the new staff director of AIPAC…In a 1992 interview (he said):… I wanted APAC to have a much broader reach into the policy-making processes of our own government.   And that meant both the Legislative and Executive branches”….Dine’s AIPAC (in addition to Congress would be)…working directly with officials in the executive branch to shape policy at the Departments of State, Defense, Commerce, and anywhere else Israel had business…Dine boasted of a “Jewish Political Power.”

–J. J. Goldberg; “Jewish Power” page 200-201

Why didn’t Jimmy Carter speak from the podium at the Democratic National Convention? Alan Dershowitz said he had something to do with it…..In an interview with Shalom TV, the Harvard Law School professor says he “pushed” Barack Obama “very hard to make that decision,” Dershowitz said in

an interview with Shalom TV. “Barack Obama had to make a choice between his

Jewish supporters and his anti-Israel supporters like Jimmy Carter, and he

did not choose Jimmy Carter. And that was an embarrassment for Jimmy Carter

and a show of disrespect.”

–Alan Dershowitz, “I helped keep Carter Silent”, Jewish Telegraph Agency, November 13, 2008

“According to the Washington Times, November 4, 1992, AIPAC’s President David Steiner in a taped telephone conversation with AIPAC donor Howard Katz boasted that the lobbying organization was “negotiating” with Clinton over whom the Democratic candidate would appoint as secretary of state and as his national security adviser should he win the election. When asked if AIPAC would participate in the selection of the new secretary of state, Steiner said, “We’ll have access….We have a dozen people in (the Clinton) headquarters. And they are all going to get big jobs,” Steiner, a trustee of the Democratic National Committee, told Katz, who had said he wanted to donate $100,000 to AIPAC-supported candidates.

Katz told the Washington Times that he taped the conversation because “as someone Jewish, I am concerned when a small group has a disproportionate power. I think that hurts everyone, including Jews. If David Steiner wants to talk about the incredible, disproportionate clout AIPAC has, the public should know about it”

–Washington Report on Middle East Affairs; “Jews and Israel, AIPAC President Resigns”

December/January 1992/93, Page 69

“In his [Powell’s] own State Department there was a keen awareness of the strength of the Jewish lobbyists. Secretaries of State did not usually meet with lobbyists, but both Jewish officials and Jews that did not officially represent specific groups from Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League to Ronald Lauder, could meet with Powell on short notice…. At the State Department, Foxman had an aura of omnipotence. He was held responsible for the appointment of Indyk as Undersecretary of State under Clinton, and was thought to have played a role in the appointments of Secretaries of State Christopher and Albright.  Powell related to Foxman almost as if he were someone to whom he must capitulate. Once Foxman told one of his deputies that Powell was the weak link. When the Secretary of State heard this he began to worry. He knew that in Washington a confrontation with the Jewish lobby would make his life difficult. Once he arranged a meeting with Foxman, but the busy Foxman postponed the meeting three times. When they eventually met, the head of the Anti-Defamation League apologized to the Secretary of State [for the postponements]. “You call, we come,” replied Powell, paraphrasing a well known advertisement for a freight company. That statement had much more meaning than just a humorous polite reply.

–Raviv Drucker and Ofer Shelah, “Boomerang:  The Failure of Leadership in the Second Intafada”, page 132-133

Let us analyze some aspects of the Jewish Triangle:


Jewish Americans usually dominate top government positions on economic and foreign policy, especially as it relates to the Middle East.    During the Clinton Administration the National Security Advisor was Sandy Berger (followed by Anthony Lake) with James Steinberg as his Deputy.   Dennis Ross, Aaron Miller, and Martin Indyk served as MidEast envoys.   Madeleine Albright was Secretary of State with Stuart Eizenstat, Peter Tarnoff, and James Rubin (son of Robert Rubin) as top Under Secretaries and Deputies.   Wililam Cohen was Secretary of Defense.

“The American people…understand the real gamble is having the same old folks doing things over and over and over again and somehow expecting a different result.” —President Elect Barack Obama

BUT:  His appointees reflect the recycling of Jewish Americans most responsible for the deregulation of Wall Street that led to our economic meltdown.   Not one of the 23 Senators or 133 members of the House of Representatives who voted against the Iraq War (his campaign hallmark) are on Obama’s transition team or been among the appointees thus far.

Examples of Top Positions held by Jewish Americans in Government:

White House Chiefs of Staff:  Second most powerful position in the White House.  All Jews.

–Reagan:  Ken Duberstein

–Bush:   Joshua Bolten

–Obama:  Rahm Emanuel  (who volunteered to serve in the Israeli army, not America’s)

–V.P. Cheney:  I. Scooter Libby

–V.P. Joe Biden:  Ron Klain  (former Chief of Staff to V.P. Al Gore)

Additionally: V.P. Al Gore had Leon Fuerth, National Security Advisor

Treasury Secretaries:

–Bill Clinton: Robert Rubin, Lawrence Summers

–Obama:  Timothy Geithner, (President of the New York Federal Reserve: dealt with meltdown of Wall Street Banks, Insurance Companies, and Financial Service Companies).   Served as Treasury Under Secretary under both Rubin and Summers.

Director, National Economic Council:

–Bill Clinton:  Robert Rubin, Gene Sperling, Stephen Friedman

–Obama:   Lawrence Summers

Federal Reserve Chairmen:  All Jews

–Carter to Reagan:  Paul Volcker

–Reagan (1987) to George W. Bush (2006):  Alan Greenspan

–George W. Bush:  Paul Wolfowitz; Ben Bernanke

Barack Obama has nominated Paul Volcker as Chariman of the newly created “Economic Recovery Advisory Board”.

Currently 5 out of the 12 Federal Reserve Bank Districts in the country are led by Jewish Americans.  (Four others are reported to be Jewish, but couldn’t be confirmed)  All Jews.

–Eric S. Rosengren (Boston); Timothy Geithner (New York City, now nominated as Treasury Secretary);  –Jeffrey M. Lacker (Richmond); Gary H. Stern (Minneapolis); Janet Yellin (San Francisco)

World Bank:

Always headed by an American has enormous power over third world country’s political and economic stability.   Seen as an extension of U.S. foreign policy.

–Recent World Bank Presidents:  James Wolfensohn, Paul Wolfowitz, currently Robert Zoellick (Jews)

(Zoellick was previously a managing director of Goldman Sachs, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State, and Bush’s U.S. Trade Representative).


Congress is the premier institution where the Jewish/Israel lobby has its most influence.   It’s been called an “Israeli Occupied Territory” and “The Little Knesset”.  In reality, it’s Congressmen who lobby the Jewish/Israeli Lobby for financial, political, and good public relation favors.  It is the most damning shameful display of a superpower surrendering and pandering its dignity, and honor to a Pro Israel Lobby.   When Congress has to choose between U.S. and Israel’s interests it adopts Israel’s interests.

One Example of Who Congress Really Serves:

June 11, 2008:  Americans denied more Unemployment Benefits.

According to an Associated Press Report the House of Representatives defeated an attempt to give unemployed Americans an extra three months of jobless benefits, i.e. extending the average $300 a week benefit check for 13 weeks for all unemployed Americans.

June 27, 2008:  Instead, Israel gets the money

According to an A.F.P. report, just sixteen days later the Congress approved a 170 million dollar increase in security assistance to Israel as part of its new 10-year, 30 billion dollar defense aid commitment to the Jewish state. The legislation gained final approval in a 92-6 Senate vote.

Israel’s automatic access to our tax dollars began in 1948 with a $100 Million grant by President Truman, an extraordinary amount in those days.

While Israel sends Israel $30 Billion ‘EXTRA” in aid, that same amount was denied to expand America’s Children Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), to the 3 American automakers whose industry employs over 1.3 million Americans, and to extend unemployment benefits suffering American families during this Wall Street manufactured economic meltdown.   But, in good government fashion Wall Street is getting trillions while Joe the Plumber has to sell his plunger to eat.

Unbeknownst to most Americans, Israel’s westernmost settlement is not located in Palestine-Israel, but is 6000 miles away on the high ground overlooking Foggy Bottom in Washington D.C.  This Capital Hill settlement of pro-Israel lobbies and think tanks strategically controls the high ground overlooking the United States’ Middle East policy landscape by having made kibbutzniks of most members of the executive and legislative branches of the government—including President-elect Obama, Vice President-elect Biden (a wannabe Zionist), and future Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel (a born Zionist).”

–Robert Weitzel, “Israel’s Settlement on Capitol Hill, Counterpunch, November 28, 2008: MUST READ

“An attack on Israel is an attack on America, in my estimation.   My No. 1 priority in foreign policy is to protect Israel.”

–Richard “Dick” Armey, former House of Representatives Majority Leader (1995-2003), in an interview with Jake Tapper, New York Times, “The Way we live now 9-1-02: Questions for Dick Armey, Retiring, Not Shy”, September 1, 2002

–On MSNBC’s “Hardball with Chris Matthews”, May 1, 2001, Rep. Dick Armey called for the expulsion of Palestinians from the occupied territories.

“It’s almost political suicide . . . for a member of Congress who wants to seek reelection to take any stand that might be interpreted as anti-policy of the conservative Israeli government.”

–President Jimmy Carter, “Palestine—Peace or Apartheid”

Former chief United Nations weapons inspector in Iraq, Scott Ritter, wrote in his 2006 book, “Target Iran:

“Let there be no doubt: If there is an American war with Iran, it is a war that was made in Israel and nowhere else.”

“You can’t have an Israeli policy other than what AIPAC gives you around here,”

–Former Senator Ernest Hollings (D-SC) on Senate Floor upon leaving office, Congressional Record – Senate, May 20, 2004, pages S5921-S5925.

“The real cost of our so-called “strategic relationship” with Israel is not just in dollars but in American lives. AIPAC, as Israel’s chief representative in Washington, promotes an agenda that undermines U.S. credibility and threatens to draw us into more needless wars in Iran and Syria.”

–Former Congressman Paul Findley (R-IL): author of “They Dare to Speak”, and, “Deliberate Deceptions”; and Founding Chairman of the “Council for the National Interest” (

“The U.S. Congress is not even handed for “domestic political reason”; and, “Israeli leaders understand our system very, very well [and] because they understand our system they can exploit it.”

–Former Congressman Lee Hamilton, was ranking Democrat on the House International Relations Committee speaking at a Middle East Symposium October 22-23 on “Conflict and Peace in the Middle East

at Carbondale, IL.

Mr. Hamilton was Vice Chair of the 9/11 Commission.  In an article by Ivan Eland of the Independent Institute, 9/11 Commission Chairmen Admit Whitewashing the Cause of the Attacks, August 7, 2006; Mr. Eland wrote:

“As both the Bush administration and its client government in Israel, with their invasions of Arab states in Iraq and Lebanon, respectively, make the United States ever more hated in the Islamic world, a new book by the chairmen of the 9/11 commission admits that the commission whitewashed the root cause of the 9/11 attacks—that same interventionist U.S. foreign policy……Former Governor Tom Kean and former Congressman Lee Hamilton, chairmen of the 9/11 Commission—have written a tell-all book, Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission (Knopf, Aug. 15, 2006)… makes the shocking admission that some commission members deliberately wanted to distort an even more important issue. Apparently, unidentified commissioners wanted to cover up the fact that U.S. support for Israel was one of the motivating factors behind al Qaeda’s 9/11 attack. Although Hamilton, to his credit, argued for saying that the reasons al Qaeda committed the heinous strike were the U.S. military presence in the Middle East and American support for Israel, the panel watered down that frank conclusion to state that U.S. policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and U.S. policy on Iraq are “dominant staples of popular commentary across the Arab and Muslim world.”

111th Congress:  100 Senators:  435 House Representatives

Jews:  <2% of Population:                     13 Senators; 32 Members of House of Representatives.

African Americans: 13% of Population:        0 Senators, 42 Members of the House of Representatives.

Hispanics:  14% of Population:                 3 Senators, ~25 Members of House of Representatives.

In the Senate’s entire History only 5 African Americans have been Senators, including Obama.

Senate Foreign Relations Committee:

The most important Congressional Committee serving Israel’s interests is the Foreign Relations Committee in both the Senate and House.

–Senate Chairs of Foreign Relations Committee:  Joe Biden (I am a Zionist), to be followed by John Kerry (of Jewish descent), staunch Israeli supporter.

–House Chairs of Foreign Relations Committee:

–Tom Lantos (deceased): Israel’s premier Congressman and sponsor/co-sponsor of every Congressional Resolution supporting Israel and attacking Arab nations.

–Howard Berman:  In a Jerusalem Post interview, June 23, 2008, the following was reported:

””Howard Berman likes to joke that he became a Zionist before he became a Democrat..  He has the helm of one of the most powerful bodies shaping US foreign policy, and he says his decision to run for Congress and focus on international relations while in office was intimately connected to his Jewish background and ties to the Jewish state.   “Israel’s security and the US-Israeli relationship is for me an issue that shapes my whole agenda [in] Congress, and guides it,”.

Senator Carl Levin (Jewish) is the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Armed Services.

–Oversee all Military budgets and policies (ensures military aid to Israel) 

Sub-Committee Chairs of House Foreign Relations Committee:

(Below, Jews Chair 4 out of the 7 Sub-Committees).   Notice the influence on the Middle East, Terrorism, and Western nations.

–Rep. Gary Ackerman: Sub-Committee on Middle East and Asia

–Rep. Brad Sherman:   Sub-Committee on Terrorism, Non-Proliferation, and Trade

–Rep. Eliot Engel:          Sub-Committee on Western Hemisphere

–Rep. Robert Wexler:    Sub-Committee on Europe

Additionally Rep. Henry Waxman (Jewish) replaced Rep. John Dingell (Catholic, been Congressmen for 53 years) as Chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee and Senator Joe Lieberman despite his opposition to Obama kept his Chairmanship of the powerful Homeland Security Committee.   Do you think the Senate feared the Lobby’s backlash if they removed Joe “the traitor” Lieberman?

The following officials are responsible for Homeland Security, Justice Department, Terrorism, and Financial Intelligence.    They have access to the most sensitive intelligence, military, technology, and international financial transactions.   All Jews.

–Michael Chertoff:   Secretary of Homeland Security

–Sen. Joe Lieberman:  Chair of Senate Committee on Homeland Security

–Michael Mukasey:  Attorney General of the Justice Department

–Stuart Levey:  Under Secretary Treasury Department for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence.

Man most responsible for closing most Muslim Charities in U.S. that assist Palestinians; accusing any Pro Palestinian individual or organization of Terrorism and imprisoning such persons for years (Dr. Sami Al Arian) without charges; and limiting the access and services of  the Arab Bank in New York City.

Two Jews who’ve served as Chairs of both the Democratic and Republican National Committees.  (there have been others such as Gov. Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania, Chair of DNC in 2000)

That’s Jewish power.

Steve Grossman (Jewish): Chair of Democratic National Committee

Went from Chair of the Massachusetts Democratic Party (1990-1992)—to-Chairman of AIPAC (Israel’s powerful lobby; 1992-1997)—to—Chairman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC: 1997-1999).   Only in America can the head of a lobbing group for a foreign nation become chair of one of the two major political parties.

According to the Jewish Telegraph Agency , January 17, 1997 (AIPAC’s Steve Grossman takes Democratic Post), Grossman, in a phone interview,  stated:   “One part of my life will always be dedicated to grass-roots activism in the Jewish community….”My commitment to strengthening the U.S.-Israel relationship is unwavering.”

Kenneth Mehlmen (Jewish).  Chair of Republican National Committee

Served as campaign manager for George W. Bush’s 2004 re-election campaign.  Became Chairman of the Republican National Committee (2005-2007).

In addition:

Rahm Emanuel (Jewish):

Served as Chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (decides which candidates gets election funds: a controlling power) for the 2006 election.  After the Democratic Party regained control of the House, he was elected as the next Chairman of the Democratic Caucus becoming the fourth highest-ranking Democrat in the House after the Speaker Nancy Pelosi

Rep. Eric Cantor (Jewish):

Within 2 years of being elected to the House of Representatives he was selected to serve as Chief Deputy Majority Whip, the highest appointed position in the House of Representatives.  On November 19, 2008, he was elected to the position of Minority Whip for the 111th Congress becoming the second highest-ranking Republican in the House.

He’s on the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, which is the chief tax-writing committee of the House with broad responsibilities on several programs.

He’s also the Chairman of the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare.

Additionally, Representative Sander M. Levin (Jewish) Chairs the Subcommittee on Trade of the Ways and Means Committee.


Referring to Vanity Fair’s 100 List of the world’s most powerful people, the Jerusalem Post reports:

“It’s a list of “the world’s most powerful people,” 100 of the bankers and media moguls, publishers and image makers who shape the lives of billions.  More than half its members, at least by one count, are Jewish….Joseph Aaron, the editor of The Chicago Jewish News, thinks it’s a list his readers should “feel very, very good about….Talk about us being accepted into this society, talk about us having power in this society,”

–Jerusalem Post, Oct. 11, 2007, “Jewish Power Dominates at Vanity Fair”,

Wall Street Banks, Insurance Companies, and Financial Centers were mostly founded by Jews and usually have Jewish executives:

All institutions below are part of the Wall Street economic meltdown, either going bankrupt, failing, or restructuring.   The U.S. taxpayer has poured over $8 Trillion into Wall Street’s financial institutions.   It’s an enormous asset to these mainly Jewish firms that their executives rotate in and out of the Treasury Department, Federal Reserve, and Securities and Exchange Commission.  Many sit on each others Board of Directors.

  1. Goldman Sachs:  (Jewish) founded in 1869 by German Jewish immigrant Marcus Goldman.  Later joined by his son in law Samuel Sachs to form Goldman Sachs.  Henry Paulson was Chair and CEO before leaving to become Bush’s Treasury Secretary.  Robert Rubin was a Co Senior Partner.
  2. Lehman Brothers:  (Jewish) founded by Henry and Mayer Lehman.  CEO:  Richard S. Fuld, Jr. (Jewish) who also is a member of the New York Federal Reserve Bank along with Michael Geinther, Obama’s Treasury Secretary.
  3. Citigroup:  Robert Rubin served as Chairman and now is a Director and Senior Counselor.  Served as Clinton’s Treasury Secretary.  Was mentor to Obama’s economic team and is Obama’s financial advisor.  Sanford A. Weill was CEO and later Chairman of Citicorp.   He also was a Director of the N.Y. Federal Reserve Board…
  4. AIG: (American International Group) Maurice R. Greenberg, Chairman for 35 years.
  5. Bear Stearns:  (Jewish), Alan D. Schwartz, President and CEO, Alan Greenberg, Chairm.

The quote below is from an article published in the Jewish Ledger March 19, 2008.

“Bear Stearns” will always be associated with financial failure rather than with its long history of success, a history from which the Jewish community was a major beneficiary….Through it all and until recently, Bear was also Wall Street’s quintessential Jewish firm. That says much in an industry that was distinguished by so many great Jewish names and fortunes: The Seligmans, Hallgartens, Goldman Sachses, Wertheims, Kuhn Loebs, Lehmans, Warburgs, Neubergers, Baches and many others had Jewish roots”.

Software and Internet:  Below All Jews.

* Steve Ballmer, CEO of Microsoft

* Sergey Brin and Larry Page, co-founder of Google

* Lawrence Ellison, founder of Oracle Corporation

* Philippe Kahn, founder of Borland

3.  HOLLYWOOD/MEDIA: Jews founded all the Hollywood Studios and the 3 Major Television Networks.


Hollywood has historically portrayed minorities in a negative often barbaric fashion beginning with Native Americans and ending with today’s Arab/Muslim villains.   (Read Prof. Jack Shaheen’s “Reel Bad Arabs”).   Arabs, Muslims, and Palestinians are constantly portrayed as terrorists, barbaric, evil, dirty, and oppressors of women.    Dehumanizing a people legitimizes wars, invasions, colonialism, and occupation.

According to the historian Neal Gable, author of An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood, “Jews invented Hollywood”.

“Hollywood studios were founded by a few Jewish immigrants like Adolph Zukor and Jesse Lasky (Paramount Studios; Carl Laemmele (Universal); Louis B. Mayer, Samuel Goldwyn and the Schenks (MGM), Harry Cohn (Columbia); William Fox  (Fox Film Corporation); Brothers Harry, Sam, Jack , and Albert Warner (Warner Brothers); Marcus Loew (Loew’s Theatres}, along with a dominance of Jewish attorney’s and  talent agents in Hollywood”.

“It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power and prominence in popular culture,” acknowledges Michael Medved, a well-known Jewish author and film critic. “Any list of the most influential production executives at each of the major movie studios will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names.”

–Michael Medved (Jewish), “Is Hollywood Too Jewish?,” Moment, Vol. 21, No. 4 (1996), p. 37.

Jonathan J. Goldberg, editor of the influential Jewish community weekly Forward. in his 1996 book, Jewish Power”, wrote:

“In a few key sectors of the media, notably among Hollywood studio executives, Jews are so numerically dominant that calling these businesses Jewish-controlled is little more than a statistical observation”.

Jonathan Goldberg, Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment (Addison-Wesley, 1996), pp. 280, 287-288. See also pp. 39-40, 290-291.


Mostly owned, controlled, and run by Jewish publishers, executives, editors, and a plethora of Jewish journalists.

In the world according to U.S. Media, the high moral ground in the Middle East belongs to Israel’s government—even when it slaughters Lebanese civilians as a matter of policy.  In news coverage , Israeli casualties are apt to have names, faces, and bereaved relatives, while Arab victims are likely to be fleeting images: nameless, faceless, distant….Israel’s most crucial allies include the mass media  of the United States.   Together with top official in Washington, news outlets keep reinforcing the assumption that the Israeli government can do little wrong”.

–Norman Solomon & Jeff Cohen, “Wizards of Media Oz”; p. 243 (courageous Jewish journalists)

–Founders of the 3 Television Networks: All Jews

William S. Paley:  founder of CBS

–David Sarnoff:      founder of NBC

–Leonard Goldenson:  founder of ABC

“The uniformity of the US media has become much more complete since the days of the cold war. During the 1990s, the US government permitted an unconscionable concentration of print and broadcast media that terminated the independence of the media. Today the US media is owned by 5 giant companies in which pro-Zionist Jews have disproportionate influence. More importantly, the values of the conglomerates reside in the broadcast licenses, which are granted by the government, and the corporations are run by corporate executives—not by journalists—whose eyes are on advertising revenues and the avoidance of controversy that might produce boycotts or upset advertisers and subscribers. Americans who rely on the totally corrupt corporate media have no idea what is happening anywhere on earth, much less at home”

–Prof. Paul Craig Roberts, “What We Know and Don’t Know About 9/11”,, August 16, 2006

Former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration,

THE BIG FIVE Media Conglomerates:

Conglomerates are responsible for over 80% of all news, editorial, sports, and entertainment information in the U.S.  Each conglomerate owns many television, cable and radio stations, movie studios, daily newspapers, weekly magazines, and publishing companies in the U.S. and around the world.  Below is only a small list of the overwhelming Jewish executives in all facets of these Conglomerate Medias.

–Viacom (CBS):  Sumner Redstone (Jewish), Chairman

39 television stations, 185 radio stations, MTV, Nickelodeon, BET, UPN, Paramount Pictures, Simon & Schuster

–Les Moonves, (Jewish): CEO of CBS Television

–Zev Shalev (Jewish): Executive Producer of CBS “The Early Show”  (daily morning show)

–60 Minutes: Don Hewitt (Jewish), Executive Producer for 36 years) followed by Jeff Fager, main Jewish Correspondents: Mike Wallace (retired), Leslie Stahl, Bob Simon, Morley Safer (attacked CBS for not showing Prophet Muhammad’s cartoons, called it cowardly): ALL Jewish

–Time/Warner (CNN): Jeffrey Lawrence Bewkes, President and CEO (Jewish)

Time Warner Cable, Warner Bros. Pictures, TNN, HBO, Warner Music Group, Time Publishing (Time, People, Sports Illustrated, Fortune, and Money Magazine).

–Jonathan Klein (Jewish) President of CNN/U.S.

–Barry Meyer: (Jewish) Chairman and CEO, Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.

–Richard Stengel (Jewish) Time Magazine’s Managing Editor.

News Corporation:  Rupert Murdoch, Chair and CEO (gentile, but some report Jewish mother)

Here’s what the editor in chief of the New Jersey Jewish News, “How now, Dow Jones?”, May 5, 2007 said of Rupert Murdoch.

“Murdoch is popular in the pro-Israel community for his newspaper’s and network’s unflinching support for Israel, and he should be. The Journal’s editorial writers also tend to take Israel’s side. But opinion is opinion, and fact is fact. You can rely on the columnists and editorial writers at Murdoch’s New York Post for a rousingly pro-Israel take on the day’s news…..For years the Post’s Israel correspondent was Uri Dan, a right-hand man to Ariel Sharon”.


Owns Fox Entertainment Group, includes Fox Television (owns 60 television stations with 188 affiliates), Fox Cable (sports, movie channels, National Geographic Channel, 20th Century Fox Movie Studio).   World’s largest publisher of english language newspapers, including the New York Post, owns Harper Collins Publishers.

Peter Chernin (Jewish) President, and Chief Operating Officers of News Corp.; Chair and CEO of Fox Group.

Roger Ailes (Jewish). President of Fox News Channel and Chair of Fox Television Stations Group

In an interview with the Vindicator paper of Youngstown Ohio, November 11, 2008, Roger Ailes was quoted as saying:   “I defend the United States, Israel and the Constitution.”

–“The Weekly Standard”:  most influential right wing magazine is owned by Rupert Murdoch with a Jewish Neocon Editor, William Kristol

General Electric:  Jeff Zucker (Jewish); President  & CEO of NBC Universal (NBC, MSNBC, CNBC)

NBC serves 220 affiliated TV stations, operates 28 TV broadcasting stations, four cable/satellite networks around the world, investments in the Internet, multimedia, cable television, Universal Studios, plus owns Telemundo, one of the two largest Hispanic broadcasting networks.

–Mark Hoffman, (Jewish): President of CNBC (Business channel):

–Ben Silverman, (Jewish): Co-Chair, NBC Entertainment and NBC Universal TV Studio

–Ron Meyer, (Jewish): President and Chief Operating Officer, Universal Studios

–Walt Disney Company:   Robert Iger (Jewish):  President and CEO

Operates ABC Network with 226 affiliated stations, Cable TV including ESPN Sports Network, Movie Studios, International Stations, Retail Store, Internet, Music, Theatres, Theme Parks, ABC Radio Networks with the largest radio sports network in the country; also owns 10 television stations, 44 AM and 18 FM Radio Stations.   Publishing, Magazines,

–David Westin (Jewish), President of ABC News

–George Bodenheimer, (Jewish):  President of ESPN (Sports Network)

According to a research and network analysis done by Sonoma University on the Boards of Directors of the ten big media organizations, only 118 people comprise the membership of all ten boards.   These 118 persons also sit on the corporate boards of 288 national and international corporations.  In fact, eight out of the ten big media giants share common memberships on boards of directors with each other.

This is the greatest and purest monopoly of power, influence, and intimidation by a small cabal of men and women who run the world’s access to information.   They formulate public opinion, create or destroy governments and careers, and regularly shape and influence government policy.

This is the greatest danger to democracy, not the terrorism of a few thousand murderous fanatics.

Jewish media power is not limited to the U.S. but is found in Europe, Canada, Australia, and other nations.

Major Jewish Newspapers: New York Times, Washington Post (Owns Newsweek), Wall Street Journal

–Tribune Company:  Sam Zell (Jewish), Chairman, President and CEO

Owns the following papers:  Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, Baltimore Sun, Sun Sentinel (South Florida), Orlando Sentinel, Hartford Courant, Morning Call and Daily Press (among others)

All three major News Magazines are owned or run by Jews:

–TIME:   Jewish Chairman of Time/Warner

–Newsweek:  Owned by the Washington Post, a Jewish owned Media Company

–U.S. News and World Report:   Owned by Jewish billionaire, Mortimer Zuckerman; who also served as President of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations; a staunch supporter of Israel.

Special Mention:

1.   Corporation for Public Broadcasting:   Chair, Cheryl Feldman Halpern (Jewish)

–CPB was created by Congress in 1967 under the Public Broadcasting Act.  It receives federal funding and in turn funds PBS and NPR (National Public Radio).    Ms. Halpern was appointed by Bush to this post in 2005.  Previously she was Chair of the Republican Jewish Coalition for eight years.   As such she was a strong critic of NPR, accusing the public network of anti-Israel bias.   Now America’s public radio networks are run by a Zionist.    That’s power.

2.  M.E.M.R.I.:  Middle East Media Research Institute, headquartered in Washington D.C.

Founded in 1998 by former Israeli military intelligence officer, Yogi Carmon, and the Israeli born Dr. Meyrav Wurmser (left for the Hudson Institute), wife of David Wurmser, former Middle East Advisor to V.P. Dick Cheney and now Director of Middle East Studies at the American Enterprise Institute

–The sole purpose of this organization is to “translate” Arab and Persian media reports into English and other languages.   It’s highly inflammatory, selective, wrong and biased translation is done deliberately to further antagonize western governments and peoples against Arabs and Muslims to further entrench Israel’s sole narrative as a victim of hate and violence.   Expectantly, MEMRI has received wide flung mention, praise, and free propaganda in the Jewish owned media such as the New York Times.


Jews, Neocons, and Pro Israel supporters dominate the landscape of Washington “think?” tanks that basically provides the “thinking” for the White House and Congress.   Their policy papers, talking points, and dominance on television news programs as “experts” as well as columnists and opinion writers for the major papers is overwhelming.   They’re funded by Jewish philanthropists and wealthy conservative foundations.

A review of their board of directors and advisors reads like a who’s who of the Executive, Legislative, Judicial branches of government; corporate America, media owners, editors, columnists, television broadcasters, academia, entertainment personalities, even foreign governmental officials.

As one example, let’s take the AIPAC founded (Martin Indyk) Washington Institute for Near East Policy:

Its Executive Director is Robert Satloff (Jewish), who served on Richard Perle’s Defense Policy Board in the Pentagon (reported to Paul Wolfowitz called the “Architect” of the Iraq War) that pushed for the Iraq War.   Dennis Ross (Clinton’s Bush, and Obama’s Mideast Envoy) is a Consultant.

Shockingly, the Board of Directors of this AIPAC formed “think tank” has 4 (bipartisan) Former Secretaries of State:  Warren Christopher, Lawrence S. Eagleburger, Alexander Haig, and George Shultz.

Plus Robert McFarlane, former National Security Advisor, R. James Woolsey, former CIA Director, Richard Perle, James G. Roche, former Secretary of Air Force, and Publisher Mortimer Zuckerman.

The same goes for other Pro Israel think tanks as well; like the American Enterprise Institute (AEI: Chairman Bruce Kovner, Jewish), the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA: Chair, Mark Broxmeyer, Jewish), Project for the New American Century (Chair, William Kristol, Jewish), Council on Foreign Relations (President: Richard Haass: Jewish); Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (President: Clifford May: Jewish);  Center for Security Policy (President: Frank Gaffney, Jewish)

Obama, especially with Hilary “Zionist” Clinton as Secretary of State, will not be able to waver from the path of allegiance to Israel.  He talks the talk but he walks the Zionist walk.  He projects confidence but in reality has shown the same insecurity, lack of confidence, and willingness to sell his political soul and nation to powerful Pro Israel Jews who’ve surrounded him and built him up from the very beginning.

Given America’s propensity to avoid confrontation, to seek a happy medium, it’s general ignorance on all matters political, especially on “foreign affairs”; coupled with the high education, wordsmith eloquence, assertiveness and projection of confidence by the “Jewish” elite who swarm around every politician; Americans willingly surrender the purview of political “expertise” to such an elite trusting that they know what’s best for America.  The Cabal Jews tell America—-trust us— we know money, and we know Arabs and Muslims, we know their violent faith, their addiction to terrorism, and the fact that they only understand power. So trust us, America, we know what’s good for them and what’s best for you.   Amen, Shalom.

“Until Israel’s hilltop settlement in our nation’s capital is dismantled, allowing for the possibility of a just and lasting peace in Palestine-Israel, its influence on both branches of our government and its insidious affect on US Middle East policy will continue to make willing—or unwitting—kibbutzniks of all Americans. We will be held as complicit, and as culpable, as the citizens of the country whose leaders sat in the dock at Nuremberg. .The world will ask, “Why didn’t you do something to stop it?”

–Robert Weitzel, “Israel’s Settlement on Capitol Hill”, Counterpunch, November 28, 2008 (a must read)

America, our manufactured friend, a friend that loves us to death, that even wallows in the murder of 3,000 Americans on 9/11 as long as it benefits its interests—-with friends like these….well you know the rest.

“We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq,”

–Former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Haaretz, April 16, 2008, “Report: Netanyahu says 9/11 terror attacks GOOD for Israel (as quoted in Ma’ariv )

As an American who loves freedom and justice for all people, I pledge to first work for the freedom of our nation from such foreign influence and betrayal by the few, the rich, the shameless, who commandeer our national interests to serve their allegiance to Israel, not America.

Americans have long endured in silence and ignorance the power of the few who’ve fostered in our psyche a herd mentality that absorbs their lies, myths, and propaganda without question causing this great nation to serve and further the political interests of a foreign nation with the blood and fortunes of our young generation.

In honoring the dead at Gettysburg, President Lincoln left a recording for history on this nation’s eternal vigilance for freedom, equality, and liberty:  “that this nation shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth”

The time for Israel and its Lobby’s stranglehold on our government and future is soon to be over.

Can you hear the Liberty Bell ring again?

“Truth is not only violated by falsehood; it may be equally outraged by silence.” Henri Amiel

MUST WATCH VIDEOS: (MUST SEE DOCUMENTARY) “Occupation 101” on Israel’s Founding, Terrorism, and Ethnic Cleansing of Palestinians out of their land) (A Moving Video of Palestinian ethnic cleansing filmed in 1950)

BBC’s “THE WAR PARTY—Zionism and in Neocon Foreign Policy” (Must watch Danish Video on: THE ISRAEL Lobby)

Sources: (Truman on having Jewish, not Arab, Constituents) (Moshe Dayan Quote on American aid) (jAlan Hart, ICH, June 8, 2008: Mr. Hart was a BBC journalist, an author, and researcher)

Eviction in battle for East Jerusalem, November 15, 2008 (Fawzia al-Kurd)

Tent of expelled Jerusalem Palestinian family torn down, November 19,  2008,2506,L-3560118,00.html

(Obama ‘s Letter to Bush: Hamas must recognize Israel 6?25/08 ),7340,L-3598462,00.html

(Obama in a Conference call with 900 Rabbis:  Israel’s security is “sacrosanct”, Ynet, 9/18/08) (AIPAC: Barack Obama’s Speech: March 2, 2007) (State Dept. Website and the Daniel Pearl Story)

(Interview with Dick Armey, NYT, Sept 1, 2002: The Way We Live now, Questions for Dick Armey—‘an attack on Israel is an attack on America”

(Counterpunch: “Rep. Dick Armey Calls for Ethnic Cleansing of Palestinians, May 2, 2002)

(Empire Builders: NeoConservatives and their Blueprint for U.S. Power:  Almost all are Jewish) (Avraham Burg Quote)

“Dershowitz:  I Helped Keep Carter Silent”, Jewish Telegraph Agency; November 13, 2008

(December 04, 2007; “DEMOCRATS & ISRAEL” A summary of Democrats pandering to Israel)

(White Man’s Burden, Ari Shavit; Haaretz), May 4, 2003) (How the Jewish Lobby Pushed for the Iraq War)

“Abraham Foxman and Intimidation of Colin Powell”

Book by two Israeli Journalists:   Drucker, Raviv and Shelah, Ofer, Boomerang…, Keter, 2005, pps. 132-133. (Columbia Journal Review) “Who Owns What” in Media)

Big Media Interlocks with Corporate America, 6/24/08)

(Sonoma University Research:  118 people compost membership of boards of directors of 10 biggest media) (Info on Top 5 Media Conglomerates)

(Comprehensive Info on Media Conglomerates)

“The Weekly Standard”/ Owned by Rupert Murdoch,  William Kristol, Editor (On Steve Grossman)

(Editor of New Jersey Jewish News on Rupert Murdoch)

Uri Avnery, “The Night After”, April 10, 2003

“9/11 Commission Chairmen Admit Whitewashing the Cause of the Attacks, August 7, 2006;”

“Project for American Century” (List of signatories of Letter to Clinton, June 3, 1997 to attack Iraq)

Elliott Abrams     Gary Bauer     William J. Bennett     Jeb Bush

Dick Cheney    Eliot A. Cohen    Midge Decter    Paula Dobriansky    Steve Forbes

Aaron Friedberg    Francis Fukuyama    Frank Gaffney    Fred C. Ikle

Donald Kagan    Zalmay Khalilzad    I. Lewis Libby    Norman Podhoretz

Dan Quayle    Peter W. Rodman    Stephen P. Rosen    Henry S. Rowen

Donald Rumsfeld    Vin Weber    George Weigel    Paul Wolfowitz

Washington Report on the Middle East, Jews and Israel, AIPAC President Resigns After Being Taped Boasting of negotiating “Sect of State” for Clinton”; December/January 1992/93, Page 69

“The Chosen: Jewish members in the 111th U.S. Congress”, Jewish Telegraph Agency, Nov. 5, 2008

List of 13 Jewish Senators and 32 Members of House of Representatives

“Time to Rethink”; Jun. 23, 2008    Interview with Rep. Howard Berman

On Vanity Fair’s List of 100 most powerful men and women in the world (51% Jewish) (Vanity Fair 100) (On Bear Stearns, Jews in Wall Street) Center for Jewish History)

All That Glitters is not Goldwyn: Early Hollywood Moguls” (United Nations:  The Humanitarian Impact of Israel’s Wall))

(Occupation Magazine: Articles, Maps, Stats) (Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs)

“America’s Pro Israel LOBBY” (quote from its website) (Anti Defamation League)

“Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations” – See List of 50 Major Jewish Organizations;  Malcolm I. Hoenlein, Executive Vice Chairman

“Clinton, Obama and the Jews”, Feb. 1, 2008: “an embarrassment of riches for Jews to have both these candidates)

(American Enterprise Institute:

President Bush proudly proclaimed that he had 20 of AEI’s members in his administration (Washington Institute for Near East Policy)

Heritage Foundation:  A Conservative Think Tank

Cato Institute:  funded by two Jews:  Charles Koch and Murray Rothbard

Good Search Site on Right Wing persons and organizations

Center for Foundation of Democracies:  President, Clifford May (Jewish)

“Tentacles or Rage: The Republican propaganda mill, a brief history”; MUST READ

Lewis Lapham / Harpers Magazine v.309, n.1852, September 2004 1sep04

“Interview with Roger Ailes, Nov 11, 2008: “I defend…Israel”

Prof. Paul Craig Roberts, “What We Know and Don’t Know about 9/11)

Overview of Jewish CEO’s, past and present MUST READ

(Jewish Issues Watchdog)

“Good News About Obama Appointments”. November 24, 2008

From Middle East Forum, by Steve Rosen, Wed, 19 Nov 2008:

Previous postings raised questions about potential nominees to Obama Administration positions regarding their views on Israel, Iran, the Palestinians, and other issues. Today, I focus on reasons to have confidence that the incoming team will do positive things in the Middle East. Many of the candidates already nominated or rumored to be likely appointees, are well known to and highly regarded by AIPAC and other pro-Israel organizations. My colleagues, and in some cases I, had contacts and dealings with each of these people over the years, and we had evidence that gave us confidence. This includes

* Rahm Emmanuel, Chief of Staff to the President;

* Ron Klain, Chief of Staff to Vice President Biden;

* Jim Steinberg, likely to be Deputy National Security Adviser or National Security Adviser to Obama;

* Tony Blinken, likely to be National Security Adviser to the Vice President;

* Greg Craig, White House Counsel;

* Pete Rouse, White House adviser;

* Jim Messina, Deputy Chief of Staff to the president;

* Phil Schiliro, Assistant to the President for Legislative Affairs;

* Dennis Ross, rumored for several top diplomatic positions;

* Jack Lew, rumored to head the National Economic Council;

* Jane Harman and Tony Lake, rumored for top intelligence positions;

* Janet Napolitano, who will head the Department of Homeland Security;

* Richard Danzig, probable Deputy Secretary of Defense;

* Richard Clarke, rumored for a ntational security post,; and many others.

Not to mention Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and Barack Obama. That certainly doesn’t mean we never had disagreements or will never, but this looks like it will be an Administration full of people quite capable of making wise decisions in the Middle East.

That said, I will continue to look for potential problems among possible nominees and policy developments.

Steve Rosen, the former AIPAC foreign policy chief who now writes a blog hosted by the Middle East Forum.

He has been under federal indictment since August 4, 2005 for alleged violations of the Espionage Act in the conduct of AIPAC’s work

Robert Weitzel, Israel’s Settlement on Capitol Hill, Counterpunch, Nov. 28, 2008: MUST READ)

List of Self Hating Israel Threatening Jews