Here are many who would argue there is no such thing as a “unifying conspiracy”, claiming that history is merely a record of the random path of evolution, the development of civilization into the “post-modern” era of industrial socialism. An excellent exposition on this theme is the book, Who Rules America Now? (1983) by G. William Domhoff, professor of sociology and psychology, upon whom I leaned rather heavily when writing The Last Chuckle
In Professor Domhoff’s own words, it was his purpose to [emphasis mine] …
“… present systematic evidence that suggests there is a social upper class in the United States that is a ruling class by virtue of its dominant role in the economy and government. It will be shown that this ruling class is socially cohesive, has a basis in the large corporations and banks, plays a major role in shaping the social and political climate, and dominates the federal government through a variety of organizations and methods.
“The upper class as a whole does not do this ruling. Instead, class rule is manifested through the activities of a wide variety of organizations and institutions. These organizations and institutions are financed and directed by those members of the upper class who have the interest and ability to involve themselves in protecting and enhancing the privileged social position of their class. Leaders within the upper class join with high-level employees in the organizations they control to make up what will be called the power elite. This power elite is the leadership group of the upper class, for not all members of the upper class are members of the power elite and not all members of the power elite are members of the upper class. It is members of the power elite who take part in the processes that maintain the class structure.”
G. William Domhoff
Who Rules America Now?
While that appears correct, insofar as it goes, Domhoff’s thesis has its shortcomings. His book contains factual and analytical obfuscation. Key elements are left out: racial, ethnic, cultural and religious data are carefully avoided. He simply refuses to look in certain places. That is clearly unscientific; one might say, unhistorical. But then, Domhoff never raises the question, “How did the power elite rise to power?” As a sociologist, his job is merely defining the social structure and behavior of this particular social class, leaving it to the historian or the anthropologist to explain how they came to be. As such, he may comfortably presume that the elite have always been in control; that they either inherited this power, or they married into it or they had bought their way in.
Money is the primary determinant of class in his study, together with membership in certain types of organization, but not others. Masonic Lodges, B’nai B’rith, the National Academy of Sciences and the National Security Council are all too conspicuously absent, though Domhoff does observe the Council on Foreign Relations, and shows particular interest in the Business Council. His presentation begs the solution that we now empower a third estate — the academic research community, the intellectual elite — to engineer the necessary social changes that will produce Justice, meaning that academe will henceforth arbitrate disputes arising from the inevitable abuse of authority by this “power elite”. Of course, that would also include the question of standing, the determination of whether a particular complaint is even acknowledged to exist. [Thus we can be assured future acts of terrorism.] One must admit that the proposition carries with it a certain gravity, a sense of inevitability, as though we were getting it anyhow.
As to the question, “How does one become a member of the power elite?”, Domhoff implies: “Go to a proper boarding school, then to Harvard, earn a Ph.D., seek positions of influence and power, and join the right social clubs.” … And exactly what are these “social clubs” to which he refers? Domhoff suggests that their primary membership is drawn from the Social Register, and that their function is to enforce certain upper-class values and social attitudes, and to provide an atmosphere where “new ideas” can be floated like “trial balloons” … something like a Bourgeois Lodge, with branch temple-resorts in Aspen, St. Moritz and Cannes. One might suppose a highly-paid entertainer, a supermodel or a famous athlete would equally qualify for membership. And of course, the media is ever-present.
Domhoff indicates that the appreciation of real estate values through the intensification of land usage has always been a private concern of the upper class, especially at the local political level. Perhaps this explains our municipal planners’ insatiable appetite for multi-culturalism, their love for immigration and incessant proselytizing about the “benefits” of a world without borders — only property rights and the intensification of land usage.
What’s amazing in all of this is that Domhoff’s thesis is based entirely upon the classic Marxist ideal of class conflict, to the exclusion of racial, cultural or religious concerns. And in this respect, the “politically correct” upper class of American society do certainly dance to the piper’s tune. In other words, Domhoff’s theory of social elitism and the Unified Conspiracy Theory are not mutually exclusive models. We simply propose to look a bit deeper.
Who are the “power elite” and what is their agenda?
Observe how differently the professor’s statement of purpose reads when one substitutes the words Freemason, Zionist, Marxist, Jew, Communist, Mobster, Tycoon, Capitalist, Socialist or Technocrat for the hypothetical and faceless term “power elite” – “those with the interest and ability to involve themselves … with high-level employees in the organizations they control … [to become] the leadership group of the upper class.”
The leadership group of the upper class … not all of whom are even members of the upper class.”
I had to read those lines many times over, before their true meaning began to sink in. Of course. The way to join the “power elite” is to become a leader — a trend setter — of upper class attitudes, social values and beliefs. The upper class are influenced through the medium of cultural, religious and educational institutions.
Observe how the media, academe, churches and philanthropic institutions today are overwhelmingly socialist, globalist and Marxist (especially in terms of “developed” and “underdeveloped” nations). There is a clear agenda at work. Now observe how Domhoff refers to these institutions as being financed and directed by the “power elite”. At this point, they may as well be named — in fact, they are. You only need to look, and see who are the donors, trustees and beneficiaries of our greatest philanthropies and shudder. And yet so many of you are afraid to look, and count. The veil is lifting.
This “socio-political” agenda has been accomplished through the manipulation of our culture, by rewriting history, by applying praise and guilt, making the upper class “feel good” about themselves when they behave in the “politically-correct” manner. Such conditioning is possible when a cabal has achieved significant influence within academe and the media. You see, the wealthy are really just sheeple like you and me. They generally think and act in exactly the way they believe they are supposed to behave. One simply applauds the very mediocrity of the upper class … the more mediocre they are, the more accolade they are given. Lady Spencer (a.k.a. “Princess” Diana) and Ted Turner are splendid examples of this. Men of genius are as rare among the upper class as they are among the commons.
Support from within the upper class is essential to the success of any cultural, political or religious movement; there has never been a case in history where this is not true. If a cabal for world dominion does exist, we would expect to find it operating within our cultural, educational and religious institutions – all of which are being drawn into academe – and functioning in both capacities: inculcating the upper class with a desired set of social attitudes, and also purging these institutions of unwanted contrary influence (men of genius, especially those with Western cultural, racial or religious awareness). Weed out the latter, construct barriers between genius and the wealthy, between the wealthy and the soul of their people, and the upper class will naturally become a Bourgeois.
The existence of the “political-correctness” movement within academe is evidence that such a conspiracy does indeed exist. Consider the following events, resulting from Lee Bass’ 1991 endowment of $20 million to Yale University in order to finance 7 tenured professors ($14 mil), 2 associates ($2 mil), and to provide logistical support ($4 mil):
“When in 1995, Yale returned $20 million given by Lee Bass to form a Western Civilization studies program, President Richard Levin claimed that logistical difficulties made implementing the project unfeasible and expensive. Recent developments in Yale’s curriculum now call this into question.
“Yale’s approval of the new Ethnicity, Race, and Migration (ER&M) major on March 6  codifies the highly politicized nature of Yale’s curricular policy. Over the past few years this policy has repeatedly thwarted attempts to bolster Western Civilization programs while encouraging ER&M and Gay Studies majors. Those administrative obstacles supposedly fatal to the Bass proposal have not blocked the other two programs.
Avik S. Roy: Race Studies Trump the Canon from Light & Truth (a Yale publication)
The rejected Bass grant represents more than just the careers of seven professors and two associates – presumably white native American males and their dependent families – that might have been; it also represents their would-have-been protegés, the cumulative impact of their respective careers. The impact upon our posterity will certainly be greater than the loss of a football stadium. And it passed with hardly a whimper.
Is it mere coincidence that Yale President Richard Levin is a Jew? Of course, one must never use that word; so we simply look the other way. And so, while the upper class in America are entrained upon trivial self-congratulation, they become increasingly predictable – increasingly controllable – precisely because of their mediocrity and conformism. That was essentially the method used by Mordecai and his niece Esther to gain control over King Ahasuerus in the Book of Esther.
This is the main theme of Dostoyevsky’s novel, The Possessed, about how a few manipulative individuals can wreak havoc within a Gentile social structure.
It is also, for that matter, the methodology of the Protocols. Especially if one can keep the wealthy very busy and self-absorbed, and nearly harassed with socialist nicety, gossip and telescopic philanthropy, they will be incapable of mounting a serious resistance to any outside agenda — even the most diabolical form of national subversion — simply because they won’t be able to see it.
In a more modern perspective, if a cabal can gain control over the institutions of national culture, and thereby manipulate the attitudes and beliefs of the upper class, subversion of the nation will follow. So goes the theory. Now for the test: has anything like this actually occurred in the United States? Who are the “power elite”, and what is their relationship with the upper class?
The key identifiers are clear: who are in control of the media, culture (entertainment) and academe?
Who created the media?
Who are the biggest advertisers?
Who control the foundations?
Who are the writers, professors, composers and thinkers?
Who are the directors, programmers and editors?
Who are producing the “educational” propaganda that is being spoon-fed our youngsters?
These questions are easy enough to answer – often as simple as reading the credits at the end of a movie or TV program – and yet how few sheeple even dare to look?
Are we afraid to see that the financiers, organizers and policy-makers are primarily Jews and their minions, and that all of these are globalist, internationalist, multicultural, pro-Zionist and Technocrats? That they are all seeking the classic Marxist one-world government? Our social, cultural and educational institutions are all interconnected, they share a common goal, and they all exclude dissent. Professor Domhoff refers to these, collectively, as the “opinion shaping and policy making network”.
One can also observe that this same cadre of internationalists have held directorships, political appointments and key cabinet positions in Federal administrations from the time of Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson to the present; many are also members of the Council on Foreign Relations, but of more immediate concern are the National Security Council, the Secretaries of Treasury and Defense, the International Space Agency and the National Academy of Sciences (all controlled by Jews); that they are financed by — and interconnected with — the central banking firms, stock exchanges, multinationals and universities; that they represent the interests of the importers, the distributors, merchandisers and finance agents; that they are also among the largest developers and institutional property-owners … and so many of them – in America – are Jews. The veil is lifting.
As one proceeds downward in his study of the power structure as it exists today, from the apex to the base of the pyramid, to examine state and local governments, chambers of commerce, law firms, party bosses, union leaders, political activists and social scientists, teachers, media owners, advertisers, civil defense and communications, doctors and psychologists, committee-persons, planning boards, arts and cultural organizers … our reader should get the point. The same pattern emerges … and once again, an almost-complete absence of dissent!
It is that silence of dissent that is so convincing. It is so very near complete, there is but the faintest wail. You can hear it in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, which postulates a time when no one will have the opportunity to be heroic, when great art will be sacrificed on the altar of universal happiness. Children will be bred by the state and conditioned to feel happy in their pre-assigned social roles. That was in 1932. Much of what he predicted has already occurred. You can hear it in Dostoyevsky, The Possessed, where “long-eared” Shigalov (the genius!) calculates how a tenth of humanity will someday enjoy complete freedom over the other nine-tenths, who are happy to be bred-down to the level of beasts.
“We shall strangle every genius in infancy!” … “It will be the Garden of Eden!” That was written in 1872, more than twenty years before the infamous Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Interestingly, Shatov, the character who dared speak the truth about nationalist-religion, was ritually murdered to “cement” the subversive cell. Dostoyevsky knew.
We can see that the work of Professor Domhoff and his colleagues, who are sociologists, psychologists and primarily Israelites, is far from irrelevant. Quite the contrary, their research is most enlightening – one might even say critical to our understanding the situation in which we find ourselves – so long as we are aware that they have an interest in deflecting our attention away from the significance of the fact that they are Jews.
The veil is lifting, and the closer we approach the nexus of power, the more frequently we encounter Jews and their lackeys: feminists, minority activists and spineless liberal professors – the classic Marxist coalition. We must bear in mind that nearly a third of all Freemasons are also Jews; and that from the time of the Blackstone Memorial, Freemasonry has been actively pro-Zionist; neither shall we forget B’nai B’rith.
One must also observe how, at the highest institutional levels, the power of Freemasonry has been largely overthrown from its preeminence of two hundred years past. The fall of Freemasonry has been matched by a corresponding rise in the power and prestige of the Jews, and of their centrality within cultural, scientific and educational institutions. It is as though the power structure that had been built by Freemasonry had become crystalized, institutionalized, and the Jews have quietly slid into the driver’s seat, inviting in all of their friends.
Look around, and bear in mind that the objective of the cabal is not just to achieve dominion, but to preserve that Dominion by breeding us down.
Why is our homeland overrun by hordes of third-world opportunists? Who threw open our borders and invited these peoples in? Why did President Clinton proclaim to the United States, and to the world, that we must prepare for the next century “when whites will be the minority in America”?
Who wants this? America has been turned into New Babylon — or B-A-B-A-L-O-N, the multicultural “melting-pot” – making us into the ideal environment for Galuth, the Diaspora Jews. The Jew prospers in America today as nowhere else in the world. Is this purely by chance?
What is this “America” of which our President speaks? Will it include Puerto Rico, Mexico, Cuba, Jamaica, Haiti and the Dominican Republic? Canada, the Philippines and Taiwan?
Why have our cities been turned into barrios that more resemble ethnic occupation-zones?
Who is behind all of this?
How did the power of bestowing citizenship come to reside within the Department of Justice, the agency that is farthest removed from the people, and which is now literally running out of control?
Why does the Fourteenth Amendment still contain wording that disfranchises anyone opposed to federalism (and internationalism)?
Why has there never been a national referendum in the United States on immigration policy?
Why is our media so biased against our own native and racial interest?
Who are teaching our children to say: “We are a nation of immigrants and they have a right to be here”?
Who control PBS, PRI (Public Radio International), the Learning Channel and educational TV?
Who started calling the North American Indians “Native Americans”, as though the rest of us are not native Americans ourselves?
Why is there no public recognition that we are being dispossessed from our homeland?
Why have our own women and children been turned against us?
Why must we suffer the fate of Rome, of Babylon and Egypt?
Who are the people that are financing and directing this network of predatory institutions? If one is going to go to such lengths to pull the strings of an innocent people and strip them of their homeland, there must be some kind of agenda behind it. One doesn’t do such things for sport.
|Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor, that twin cities frame.
“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”Emma Lazarus
The New Colossus
In so many words, Emma is showing us the answer: her image of the “Mother of Exiles” standing at our gates, inviting the refuse of the world to enter in. Who is this “Mother of Exiles”? Who put that damned statue outside our harbor and called it the “golden door”? A harbor is a place of refuge, but not a permanent abode. The “golden door” is something altogether different. Is there an intentional twist of poetic irony in all of this, something like the fabled Trojan Horse, but infinitely more malevolent? Maybe we are the bigger fools, to have let someone else give away our homeland. To whom and for what?
We do know that Emma Lazarus was a Jewess and a committed Zionist, her father a wealthy New York sugar refiner (which industry still employs the lowest-paid workers in the world). Who else could this “New Colossus” – this “Mother of Exiles” – be than the Golah, the “Deserted Wife” of Isaiah, beckoning her children to follow, and to “set firm their stakes”. She is also the Jew standing at our gates, inviting the peoples of the world to enter in. To them she is B-A-B-A-L-O-N, the “melting pot”, Queen of the City of the Pyramids. Her number is an hundred and fifty-six. Six times twenty-six. The number of Zion is also an hundred and fifty-six. Is this all coincidence?
Yet surely, the Jews are the “Mother of all Exiles”. Perhaps we have too quickly assumed that Emma Lazarus was merely a bad poetess. We may have been fooled. Read her poem again, in light of its title, The New Colossus. This is not to be an empire built by valiant arms, as had the ancient Greeks and Romans. This New Colossus is an empire built by way of deception, trickery and betrayal, by means of stealth and irredentism. These are the ways of the god of Jacob. The statue of “Liberty Enlightening the World” was the gift of French Jacobites, given in 1886, the fourth year of the Jewish exodus to the United States. She cradles a plaque in her arm, like Moses the Ten Commandments, inscribed with the numeral “1776” as though to commemorate the American Revolution. That plaque represents the equality polemic of the Declaration of Independence …
“That all men are created equal”
… and it should be borne in mind that, at the time those words were written, the Revolutionary War was already in full-swing, and the purpose of the Declaration of Independence was to muster the support of the commons behind the already-selected leaders. It was not necessary that those leaders actually believe their own propaganda.
Be that as it may, in the final analysis, the “Equality Polemic” tends to deny the existence of both “national rights” (as in a homeland) and individual rights, in order to assert its own ideal of “Human Rights”, which are to be shared “equally” by all world-citizens.
It was this equality polemic that Charles Sumner and the Illuminati wished to elevate to equal standing with the Constitution, and together with international treaties, as the Law of the Land. The plaque represents Human Rights, the banner of the Society for Ethical Culture, organized as the Humanist Church of Man (Woman).
The symbol of the imprisoned lightning represents the feminist usurpation of the male creative spirit, one of the occult secrets of Mystery Babylon. The Statue of Liberty was erected in the year 1886, the centennial of 1786, the year before the “Constitutional” convention was foisted upon our forefathers. It was the year when theFederalist conspiracy was set in motion, when the State of Virginia refused to honor the fivepercentum under the Articles of Confederation because the international bankers had been caught tampering with the books. The 1786-1886 centennial represents the betrayal of the American Revolution.
Why does Emma use the words, “oursea-washed, sunset gates” in line three? Who is “we”? New York is on our (white native American) eastern coast. Why the sunset? Emma’s “we” is clearly not us native Americans. Are these “sunset gates” to be opened for something to be brought in, or for something else to emerge? Perhaps both? The western is the sunset coast, and sunset beckons the night.
For, behold, darkness shall cover the earth,
And gross darkness the peoples;
But upon thee the Lord will arise,
And His glory shall be seen upon thee.
And nations shall walk at thy light,
And kings at the brightness of thy rising.
Lift up thine eyes round about, and see:
They all are gathered together, and come to thee;
Thy sons come from far,
And thy daughters are borne on the side.
Then thou shalt see and be radiant,
And thy heart shall throb and be enlarged;
Because the abundance of the sea shall be turned unto thee,
The wealth of the nations shall come unto thee.
According to the Masoretic Text
What a perfect companion to Emma Lazarus’ poem. Or vice versa; a perfect match. What spectacular imagery, the Mother of Exiles lighting the way for her children in the darkness of night. The image of Columbia leading the proletarian masses, and the Illuminati who named the Seat of their government the “District of Columbia”. Oh my, have we been fooled?
Of all the possibilities that had existed for our people – our forefathers – two hundred and fifty years ago, why has it come down to this? Is it so impossible to imagine that we might have closed our borders at any time? That we could have preserved our heritage and developed a culture and a homeland of our own? The ancient Romans, whose origins were remarkably similar to ours, had managed to do so for many centuries, up until the time they became an empire. During the earlier period of the Republic, they guarded their citizenship so jealously that they fought against their own allies in the Marsian Wars to make that point. Yet we treat our own “citizenship” as if it were a cheap entitlement to be handed out in a world lottery.
Whose idea was it that the United States be made into an empire – Columbia (another name for America) – with the full knowledge that this would mean the destruction of our freedom, that we suffer the fate of ancient Rome? That we be stripped of our heritage and boiled down in the “melting pot” of race-mixing, as though we were common ingredients for a mad witch’s brew? And to what purpose? To breed the new world-proletariat?
The great achievements of Western Civilization were made possible by what the ancient Romans called dignitas. It means the pride of a people in their ancestry, their heritage and their culture. It is for this reason that the aristocracy shared, and sometimes enforced, a “dominant” culture on their people. To be a Roman was to have dignitas. It meant holding to a higher standard than barbarians and savages. It meant discipline and sacrifice, and these virtues were embodied in every aspect of their culture. The ancient Roman aristocracy understood that they maintained the strength and character of their people, their dignitas, through upholding their inherited culture.
In America, the upper class have pursued an entirely different agenda than past Western Civilization. Our elite have renounced their responsibility to their own race, and sold out for the bogus utopia of socialism and multiculturalism as a cover for Bourgeois self-gratification. They have literally turned upon their own people, and leant themselves to the construction of this vast machinery of socialization that now oppresses us. It is precisely this change in attitude among the upper class that beckons the sunset of civilization, for which Emma had so yearned.
In America, the condition appears to have been prematurely induced. Our concept of “heritage” was systematically undermined, and replaced by its antithesis – the “melting pot”. And so the thought of conspiracy looms over us. The issue to be resolved, then, is this: Is there a central, unifying conspiracy of such significance that it has been able to alter the course of history?
This writer maintains that there is.
By now, it should be quite clear that the people of America have been betrayed, and it appears beyond our power to bring those responsible to justice, or to extricate ourselves from their web. Obviously, the rules of civilized behavior, upon which we had relied, have been violated. The purpose of a conspiracy theory is to uncover who, or what, has been working so silently and invisibly all of these years to bring about our downfall and, perhaps, to understand why.
At this point in the argument, we will present the barest outline of He-Khabbalot Yahudim, saving the esoteric discussion for later. Beginning as we are, in media res, what matters is that the theory we are presenting can be reconciled with world power as it is known to exist today, and with the historical chain of events that has led to our present condition. We shall emphasize the centrality of the Hebrew Prophecies, so often disregarded because of our refusal to examine our own religious beliefs and indoctrination.
The picture, thus far unfolded, is that Freemasonry had successfully contained the forces behind the American Revolution and, by 1789, the lodges had achieved their objective in the creation of the Constitution of the United States of America. One could almost add an “Inc.” onto the end of that, because this Constitution had been imposed for the singular purpose of restoring the briefly-sovereign states [actually, nations] to their original condition as subsidiary incorporations under a higher authority.
In the course of the American Revolution, the Lodge had managed to re-establish its control over the entire political process, from the smallest town to the highest court, and over all the major institutions of religion, industry, socialization and science. They had, in fact, reinstated that very same British System from which the colonists had originally revolted.
However, in the process of securing this domain, the Masons had incurred substantial debt, in the name of “the United States in Congress Assembled”; and this money was owed primarily to a network of Sephardic banking institutions operating out of the Netherlands, and also to the upstart Ashkenazi capitalists of the Rhineland, Austria and France. The new Constitution had been created largely to satisfy these investment demands, securing the loans with land mapped out within the Republic and its Territories.
In fact, several significant tracts of real estate had been sold by the Republic, many to European investors, in order to make payment on these loans. But on the surface, everything was under control, and the Republic had excellent credit, as much for its tobacco, cotton and indigo monopolies, as for its vast land reserve. It had a large, well-equipped merchant fleet, and one of the most technologically-advanced money systems in the world.
Meanwhile, another nation was arising out of Europe, seeking a literal fulfillment of the Hebrew Prophecies themselves. This Other Nation had, for nearly two millennia, been outcast, persecuted, hated and despised by mankind; for according to legend, they had been driven out of their homeland by their own god for their iniquities. Thus accursed, secrecy and intrigue have become a way of life for these people, that even their god YHVH remains shrouded in mystery and myth. It is a god who can never be named, a god of no name; and it is also a god of many names. More than anything else, their god is a religious deification of their race, and that is what has held these people together for so many centuries, and upheld their belief in the fulfillment of their peculiar racial destiny.
The Jews have always known themselves to be the “Chosen People”. It was out of sheer necessity that they acquired their aptitude for assimilation along with a unique self-governing capability; and once developed, this power was not limited in its application. It also enabled them to function as a parasite within their several host countries, to “suck the milk of nations”, to and conquer nations from within.
The Book of Esther is a blueprint for this kind of political subversion, as also the career of Joseph who, having first collected all the grain surplus in Egypt for seven years, took advantage of a famine to create a money-crisis:
“And Joseph gathered up all the money that was found in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, for the corn which they bought: and Joseph brought the money into Pharaoh’s house.
“And when money failed in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, all the Egyptians came unto Joseph, and said, Give us bread: for why should we die in your presence? for the money faileth.
“And Joseph said, Give your cattle; and I will give you [grain] for your cattle, if money fail.
“And they brought their cattle unto Joseph: and Joseph gave them bread in exchange for horses, and for the flocks, and for the cattle of the herds, and for the asses: and he fed them with bread for all their cattle for that year.
“When that year was ended, they came unto him that second year, and said unto him, We will not hide it from my lord, how that our money is spent; my lord also hath our herds of cattle; there is not ought left in the sight of my lord, but our bodies, and our lands:
“Wherefore we shall die before thine eyes, both we and our land? buy us and our land for bread, and we and our land will be servants unto Pharaoh: and give us seed, that we may live, and not die, that the land be not desolate.
“And Joseph bought all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh; for the Egyptians sold every man his field, because the famine prevailed over them; so the land became Pharaoh’s.
“And as for the people, he removed them to the cities from one end of the borders of Egypt even to the other end thereof.
Genesis 47, 14-21
King James Version
“And he removed the people (the Native Egyptians) to the cities” … exactly what is being done to every country today, while cheap immigrant labor is imported in. The United States is being destroyed in exactly the same way as Ancient Egypt was – by amalgamation!
How remarkably like the Federal Reserve. Even as I write this, the process is being replicated against the Asian nations through the IMF bailout of their sudden monetary crisis, and also against the Europeans, whose destiny is shackled to the ECU. Britain and America (North, Central and South) are already in the hands of the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and Warburgs, and so only Sweden and Denmark remain aloof, for the present. And Switzerland is paying reparations, not to deny that they, too, have their great Jewish banking houses.
The Jews from early on had become the masters of mammon, the supreme power over men, and they learned the secret of its creation, which is the power to instill faith in money. This knowledge, combined with their deeply esoteric nature and peculiar instinct for racial survival, turned them into a vampire nation.
Just as Joseph had delivered Egypt unto Pharaoh, America was handed over to the Jews. As Mordecai, in the Book of Esther, had plotted the overthrow of Aman the antisemite and subverted the kingdom of Xerxes, the Illuminati, agents of He-Khabbalot Yahudim, managed to subvert the Freemasons and the institutions that they had so carefully constructed. Just as the Cabal in ancient Babylon twice betrayed that city, opening its gates first to Cyrus the Mede and later to Darius the Persian, so He-Khabbalot have thrown open our gates to admit, first the Jews, and then the tide of third-world migration.
“But the Illuminati are not all Jews,” you say. And that is correct. We were not betrayed by the Jews; we have been betrayed to the Jews. Moses was only Hebrew by birth, allegedly; but culturally, he was Egyptian. He had been raised up in the Egyptian priesthood, not the ways of Abraham.
Nobody is quite sure where the Levites came from.
And who was this other character – Aaron – Moses’ companion and high-priest? Tradition says that Aaron was Moses’ brother, therefore a Levite. But what Hebrew, other than Moses, could possibly have been initiated into the Egyptian priesthood? The answer is none, because the Hebrew nation did not yet exist. It was Moses who initiated Aaron into the Mysteries, and together they created the Hebrew nation. The “Covenant” is their handiwork. Their successors are He-Khabbalot Yahudim.
The Jews are merely instruments in the hands of He-Khabbalot; the Jews are the handiwork and also the carriers of the cabal. Consider what the scriptures have to say about this:
They shall inherit the land for ever;
The branch of My planting, the work of My hands,
Wherein I glory.
The smallest shall become a thousand,
And the least a mighty nation;
I the Lord will hasten it in its time.
According to the Masoretic Text
Interestingly, the Masonic Lodge teaches much the same thing: that the secret knowledge of Hiram Abiff was far older than even the Hebrews; that it reaches back before the time of Egypt of the pharaohs to Sumeria, in the most distant past, and the Chaldean Magi.
Joseph was no mere shepherd boy; he could never have become Pharaoh’s counselor had he not been an initiate of the Mysteries. Various Jewish researchers have even suggested that the Levites (which include Moses by birth) were not necessarily of the seed of Abraham, that they had merely taken the name Levi during the Exodus.
It is argued that the “Hebrews” of the Exodus were really a polyglot mix of peoples, remnants of the Hyksos and various hangers-on. It is suggested that the actual seed of Abraham had long since amalgamated — and what of his daughters, or had he none? With whom did his grandsons-and-daughters intermarry? Who was there to record and safeguard the genealogy? Only a priesthood could manage such matters, and even then for only a few — the initiates, of course.
Clearly, by the time of the Exodus only the myth — and perhaps a secret priesthood — remained, to be used by Moses and Aaron in creating this New Race, the “Children of Israel”.
The name Moses is itself Egyptian, not Hebrew, and it means simply, “the son of …”. Thuthmosis is Thoth-moses, “Son of Thoth”. Rameses is Ra-moses, “Son of Ra”. The investiture of Joseph as Vizier in Egypt is dated somewhere between 1884 and 1570 B.C.E., either just before or at the very beginning of the rule of the Hyksos, or “Shepherd-Kings”, who had migrated into the northeastern Delta region during a famine, generally dated around the mid-17th century B.C.E., a period when Egypt was weak and divided.
The Hyksos were Semites, semi-nomadic Canaanite tribes and, like Abraham, descended from the earlier Semitic peoples of Ur [or Aur, meaning “Light”] and Chaldea, which name literally means “Light of the Magi”. The Egyptian word for Hebrew, Habiru or Hapiru, refers to these people as a class. It meant “caravan-men”, or “dusty men”, because the Habiru clans would often migrate on long trading journeys, taking their women, children and flocks along with them. The Hapiru were also skilled metalsmiths, and they understood the making of money, that tool by which Joseph managed to enslave the Egyptians and deliver them unto Pharaoh (the beginning of the Hyksos reign?).
The Hyksos ruled Egypt from their capital at Avaris for about a hundred years, until the Egyptians rebelled under the pharaohs Thutmosis (1560-1550) and Amosis (1552-1527) and enslaved those whom they captured. Under terms of an armistice, approximately 250,000 unconquered Hyksos left Egypt with their possessions and settled in the area between Jerusalem and Damascus.
The Hebrew Exodus is Biblically dated between 1501 and 1447, or shortly after the Hyksos expulsion, though some chronologists have placed the date as late as 1270. When Moses was on Sinai receiving the Commandments, we are told that the people said unto Aaron, “Make us gods which will go before us” and reverted to paganism (Ex. 32:1), thus demonstrating the lack of any common religion or identity.
Moses provided essentially that, creating a new religion that was an amalgamation of Chaldean, Sumerian, Egyptian and Midianite mysteries and practices. He presented his people with a “Covenant”, that they should dwell in their “Promised Land” according to the Law of Moses, and not intermingle with foreigners. To what purpose? One thing is certain. The Egyptians had, by this time, amalgamated with other races and grown weak.
Everything in the Mosaic Law was aimed at preserving the purity of the newly-created Hebrew race. Were Moses and Aaron dabbling in the science of human husbandry?
Some five hundred years later, upon the death of Solomon (around 985 B.C.E.), the Hebrews began to falter. Solomon had greatly abused the people with forced labor, heavy taxation and the oppressive levy of virgins to supply his harem, while his own tribe of Judah had been privileged as tax-collectors, as the tribe of Levi were privileged to be the priests. The other ten tribes seceded from Jerusalem and formed their own kingdom to the north, Israel, with its capital at Samaria.
About two hundred years later, around 722 B.C.E., the northern kingdom of Israel was captured by Shalmaneser, king of Assyria. He scattered the ten tribes of Israel to the farthest reaches of his empire so that, by separating these people from their land and heritage, and from one another, he also destroyed their culture, religion and ethnicity, causing them to amalgamate with his other subject peoples. He clearly understood that amalgamation is the only way to destroy a race.
Meanwhile, in Judea to the south, the prophets Micah and Isaiah were eyewitness to the fate of Israel. They understood how Judea would be next; that the Mosaic law would sooner or later fail them. Shalmanesser was neither the first conqueror, nor would he be the last to practice genocide by amalgamation. Yet these prophets were also Magi, initiates of the Mysteries, and so they undertook nothing less than the complete reconstruction of the Mosaic religion.
They created the Hebrew Prophecies, the Myth of Golah and Aliyah, the Diaspora and Return to Eretz Yisreal, the Land of Greater Israel. They crafted this religion so that it could endure the conditions of exile, preserving the race. Amalgamation is countered by assimilation. This Second Chosen People (oops!) that was born out of the tribes of Judah and Levi became known as the Jews:
Than the children of the married wife, saith the Lord. Enlarge the place of thy tent,
And let them stretch forth the curtains of thy habitations, spare not;
Lengthen thy cords, and strengthen thy stakes.
For thou shalt spread abroad on the right hand and on the left;
And thy seed shall possess the nations,
And make the desolate cities to be inhabited.
Fear not, for thou shalt not be ashamed.
Neither be thou confounded, for thou shalt not be put to shame;
For thou shalt forget the shame of thy youth,
And the reproach of thy widowhood shalt thou remember no more.
According to the Masoretic Text
Incidentally, the word “desolate” does not mean “empty of bodies” in the physical sense, but rather spiritual absence of He-Shekhinah, the indwelling manifestation of God. He-Goyim (meaning ourselves) are not really “people”, in the sense of having souls (the Shekhinah); we are something halfway between animal and human.
Obviously, there is nothing wrong with breeding us like farm animals. It is not a pretty picture, from our Goy perspective. Also, please observe how – and this shall be pointed out again later – these verses are constructed as poetic couplets, a pattern of strophe and antistrophe, sermon and refrain, prayer and response, and they are meant to be reenacted as such. They are musical and ceremonial in nature. They are part of a formally codified practice of ceremonial magick. They are extremely powerful, and they are a curse.
One should need look no further to understand what we mean now by He-Khabbalot Yahudim – the Jewish Curse, the Jewish Welcome, and the Jewish Cabal. Understand the power of such magick, ceremonially performed over and over again, for a period of two thousand and seven hundred years. The people need not know what they do, or why, because “in the saying the act is accomplished.”
The fall of Jerusalem and the conquest of Judea by Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, is dated between 597 and 586 B.C.E., approximately one hundred and fifty years after the fall of Israel. During that interim, the new religion created by Isaiah and Micah had time to take hold. Now begins the Diaspora, the Exile, and with it the promise of Redemption and Revenge:
“And Aliens shall build up thy walls,
And their kings shall minister unto thee; “For in My wrath I smote thee,
But in My favor have I had compassion on thee.
“Thy gates also shall be open continually,
Day and night, they shall not be shut;
That men may bring unto thee the wealth of the nations,
And their kings in procession.
“For that nation and kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish;
Yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted.”
According to the Masoretic Text
Once again we can see, preserved in the Masoretic Text, the poetic couplets that mark these “prophecies” of Isaiah, and begin to comprehend the effect of their repetition – a grimoire of ceremonial cursing – as it has been practiced over the millennia. One cannot help but reflect on the fate of the Third Reich, and perceive how the Hebrew Prophecies are indeed finding fulfillment in our own time.
Many Christians have observed how nations have been raised up and cast down according to the way they have treated the Jews, and concluded this as proof that the Jews are the “Chosen People of God”.
Yet few of these Christians have investigated the matter further, from an historical and non-Biblical perspective (as do many Jews themselves), to understand how each nation that was raised, had been raised up by the power of Jewish banking and finance (from the time of the Hyksos), and how each was then subverted before it was cast down … to see how every nation that has ever been visited by the Jews, has eventually been betrayed by the Jews.
Is this the work of “God”, or is it a result of He-Khabbalot Yahudim, the Jewish Curse?
Today we can see our own “kings”, be they presidents or clerics – capitalists, Freemasons or academicians – who have delivered us up to He-Khabbalot Yahudim. Think of the cabal as being like a disease that has been carried by the Jews. Like it or not, we have become infected by it and, like it or not, we are now compelled to serve Zion.
It has long been written in the holiest scripture, in the depth of the Jewish collective soul, that it is their destiny and birthright to rule the World:
That the mountain of the Lord’s house shall be established as the top of the mountains,
And it shall be exalted above the hills;
And all nations shall flow into it.
And many peoples shall go and say:
“Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord,
To the house of the God of Jacob;
And He will teach us of His ways,
And we will walk in His paths.”
For out of Zion shall go forth the law,
And the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.
And He shall judge between the nations,
And shall decide for many peoples;
Isaiah 2:1-4 – According to the Masoretic Text
These same verses are today inscribed on the “Isaiah Wall”, outside of the United Nations Building in New York City. That, in itself, is sufficient cause to weigh their historical significance.
One need only ponder the influence of the Hebrew-Jewish-Christian Bible upon our culture and beliefs, to gain some idea of its awesome power. For the past fifty years, even as I write this, the veil has been lifting. Perhaps, before long, the whole world will know, and these things whereof I write shall be made clear. And if, knowing the Zionists to be our masters, we should then continue to submit (as I think we must), shall we not then acknowledge ourselves to be their slaves?
And strangers shall stand and feed your flocks,
And aliens shall be your plowmen and your vinedressers.
But ye shall be named the priests of the Lord,
Men shall call you the ministers of our God;
Ye shall eat the wealth of the nations,
And in their splendor shall ye revel.
According to the Masoretic Text.
And the sons of them that afflicted thee
Shall come bending unto thee,
And all they that despised thee shall bow down
At the soles of thy feet;
And they shall call thee The City of the Lord,
The Zion of the Holy One of Israel.
According to the Masoretic Text
Do you get it? The “City of the Lord” is the same as the Nation of Israel, which includes all Jews, Diaspora and Israeli. It is the same vision that John the Evangelist evokes in the Book of Revelations.
So where in hell did he get the idea that this is supposed to be Jesus’ “Second Coming”? Was the author of the “Christian” Apocalypse perhaps, like the Knights Templar of a later age, and the Freemasons four centuries after that, trying to steal the Jewish mystique?
It really is pitiful. Jesus had given his life to destroy the self-fulfilling prophecies of Zionist millennialism, and yet within a century of his death, we find the “Christian” Church endeavoring to bring about the same, heedless of Jesus’ repeated admonishment, “My kingdom is not of this world!”
And do take a moment to appreciate the poetic construction of the Masoretic Text, how each part is complete in itself (i.e. you can skip every-other line).
The Prophecies shall be examined in greater detail in a later chapter, Zionism and the New World Order; for now it is sufficient to admit that all nations know and fear the Hebrew Prophecies, whether we believe in them or not. Given the religious conviction carried forth from these visions, it is not surprising to find that, even as the children of Jacob and Judah have wandered from land to land, their destiny has become interwoven with that of every other nation, and their religion has influenced every other, and their superstitions have become the beliefs of many peoples. Yet, throughout the centuries of Diaspora, the Chosen Race has always managed to assimilate without itself being amalgamated, and to preserve intact the power of its supernatural destiny.
As one grasps the awesome significance of the Hebrew Prophecies, and the centrality of He-Khabbalot Yahudim, one begins to understand how all the other “conspiracy theories” that have gained such popularity – the Council of 300, the Club of Rome, Scarlet and the Beast, the Skull & Bones, the Illuminati, Majestic-12, the Jason Society, the Bilderbergs, MK-Ultra, the Lotus Club, the O.T.O, the Grand Orient and the Golden Dawn to name a few – are merely tentacles of He-Khabbalot, like little eddies spun off from a giant whirlpool; and yet, even among these “secret societies” and “social clubs”, one also finds a preponderance of Jews. The veil is lifting.
At the beginning of the 17th century, the British Empire was rising toward the pinnacle of global power, assisted by its allies, the Jewish Nation. It was Oliver Cromwell who first agreed to let the Jews back into England, in return for their financing the English civil wars. Under William, Duke of Orange, the trickle of Jewish immigration to England became a torrent, again the result of a financial agreement. The power of the British Crown was already deeply intermingled with that of Freemasonry, whose design was to make America into a Masonic New Sion: the Anglican counterfeit, if you will, of the New Jerusalem in the ancient Hebrew Prophecies and also in the Christian Book of Revelation.
The Jewish Nation were meanwhile being guided and manipulated by their patriarchs, the “Secret Chiefs” or He-Khabbalot Yahudim, the arch-parasite, whose vision it was that America become the staging-ground for a Jewish rise to world dominion – the foundation for the “mountain of the Lord’s house” described by the prophets Micah and Isaiah.
Thus America became the object of a struggle between these contending and yet allied forces. From the perspective of He-Khabbalot Yahudim, it was not enough simply to infiltrate and manipulate the lodges of Freemasonry, for such would be comparable to riding bareback on a tiger who, at any time, might break free.
It was necessary for them to construct a dialectic, an antithesis, a contra-Freemasonic force that would act as a check and perpetual balance. This was the purpose for which the Illuminati were created, to act within both Freemasonry and the rising socialist movements, later Marxism, as agents-provocateur in the service of the “Secret Chiefs”, who themselves would be manipulating the two parties into a paralysis of equilibrium.
As we have already observed, in Europe the Illuminati had raised up Napoleon to emancipate the Jews; and in America, Abraham Lincoln was raised up to prepare the United States to receive the Jews.
It was to this end that the agitation in America was pushed to the extreme of the Civil War – to shatter the existing order so that the socialists could rise to equal power within the Republic. It was to this end that the Illuminati became active in the leadership of the abolitionists, the feminists, the utopians, the Unitarians and their allied socialist movements, organizing a coalition that still survives today.
It was this dialectic – a conflict between the two polarities of Masonic (pantheistic) capitalism and Illuminist (atheistic) socialism – that shaped America as we know it, with the financiers – He-Khabbalot – characteristically playing both ends against the middle. But it must be remembered that the “mountain of the Lord’s house” is described as an institution of education and law, neither a religion nor a national government, but a complete social governing system; that, as this new ordering of the ages progressed, nation-states would be superseded by global institutions, and that to crystallize these emergent institutions into the infrastructure of Zion, the Illuminati themselves – the agitators, the agents of change – would be transformed from iconoclasts into icons. [Iconoclast: destroyer of long-held values]
The Illuminati, who had by the late-18th century gone underground to form esoteric reading societies, emerged from this gestation as professors and ministers of the Enlightenment, politicians, academicians and social leaders. It is therefore not surprising to find that most of the Illuminati agents were indeed Gentiles, and not Jews. Against such a backdrop, neither is it surprising to find that the most honored of our Founding Fathers were also being played as pawns:
“John Quincy Adams, in 1800 opposed Thomas Jefferson for the presidency and wrote three letters to Colonel William L. Stone exposing how Jefferson was using Masonic lodges for subversive (Illuminati) purposes. The information contained in these letters is credited with winning Adams the election. The letters were held in the Rittenburg Square Library, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.”
It has already been described how Adam Weishaupt had established, as his first objective, the infiltration and subversion of the Lodges of Freemasonry. This had been largely achieved in Europe by the time of the 1782 Wilhelmsbad Convention.
In England and America, however, the Lodge had become split between the Whig and Tory factions. As we recall, the Lodge of St John’s, warranted by the Grand Lodge of England was nominally loyal to the House of Hanover, which held the English Crown, and represented the American Tories during the Revolutionary War.
It was the Lodge of St Andrew’s, warranted under the Grand Lodge of Scotland, still pledging loyalty to the deposed Stuarts, whose membership contained most of the American Revolutionary leaders. Thus the connection between the American Revolutionary leaders and the French, who bailed them out, runs through the French Jacobean Lodges, who were later behind the French Revolution of 1798.
But the Jacobeans were not French; they were Scots – Stuarts in exile – and the term “Jacobean” refers to King James I of England (James VI of Scotland) and the Stuart Dynasty. The name James is simply the Latin form of Jacob. In light of this, the following piece of information is most extraordinary:
“In 1801, the Tory faction of U.S. Freemasonry – the grouping of Freemasons who had sided with England during the American Revolution – opened up shop as the Grand Council of the Princes of Jerusalem of the Mother Supreme Council of the Knights Commander of the House of the Temple of Solomon of the Thirty-third Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Order of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry in the United States. This U.S.-based British Freemasonic Lodge was chartered in Charleston, S.C. The members of this British-led secret society would direct the Confederate secessionist insurrection. Other Scottish Rite members would be among the founders of the B’nai B’rith …”Among the founding members of the Charleston Scottish Rite Lodge were many prominent Jews, including Isaac DaCosta, Moses Cohen, Israel De Lieben, Dr. Isaac Held, Moses Levi, and Moses Peixotto. Many of these men were Sephardic Jews from North Africa or from Spain who had originally settled in the Caribbean and engaged in the early slave trade.”
EIR (Executive Intelligence Review)
The Ugly Truth About the ADL
Some of these names are by now familiar. What we see here is evidence of how, some twenty-five years after the American Revolution, and thirteen years after creation of the Constitution, the two major factions of European-American Freemasonry had become reconciled under Jewish leadership. The American Lodge of St. Andrew, which claims the Templar heritage, is being Illuminated by Sephardic Jews, as had their Stuart-Jacobean brethren in France been illuminated by the Ashkenazim.
The other Freemasonic lineage is the Hanoverian Lodge of St. John (the Pretender), whose roots go back to the British, French, Dutch and German Rosicrucians. The Sephardic bankers of Holland had orchestrated and then financed the rise to power of Oliver Cromwell, who allowed the Jews to resurface in England, and then William, Duke of Orange, who chartered the Bank of England as a means of repayment to his benefactors.
By leveraging their capital stock in the British East (Sepharad) India Company with their existing holdings in the Dutch West (Ashkenaz) India Company, the Jews soon gained control of the capital stock of the Bank of England. This move corresponded with the Illumination of the Lodge of St. John (the Pretender) by way of the Rosicrucians. Thus virtually all of Freemasonry was Judaized over the course of three centuries.
If one postulates this ultimate source of intrigue as being the Bavarian Illuminati, a common assumption, we know that their higher degrees were completed, not by Adam Weishaupt, but by the Baron von Knigge. We have also learned that the Baron, who had been Weishaupt’s chief organizer and financier, was also a member of the Chabrath Zerek Boqer Aur, a much older Jewish-Masonic lodge based in Frankfurt, which was also the point of origin for the most powerful of the German-Jewish central bankers: the Rothschilds, the Speyers, the Oppenheimers, the Seligmans, the Habers and the Bethmanns.
Here we come up against a very real force – the power to create money; and it is here that all of the threads that we have been discussing come together at that same point, in time and place. But not just yet. There is one more critical piece of evidence to be examined.
There is another book, sacred to this tribe, called the Kabbalah. Its name literally means “a welcome” – an initiation – for the Kabbalah is the key to understanding the hidden cipher of the Hebrew Scriptures and Prophecies. The “Secret Chiefs” of this tribe, descended as they are from magicians, Kabbalists and mystics, are dedicated to the task of bringing about the fulfillment of these same prophecies. To this end, they have learned to become masters of intrigue, deception, the sleight of hand, and the inspiration of secret societies from the Knights Templar and the Rosicrucians to the Golden Dawn, Argenteum Astrum and the O.T.O., because from time immemorial the nations of the world have sought to discover the secret knowledge of the Jews. It is not mere coincidence that the word “cabal” is derived from the Hebrew Kabbalah.
It was in 917 C.E. that Aaron ben Samuel, a Babalonian scholar and a Jew, arrived in Italy. He carried with him the texts and ancient oral traditions of the Practical Kabbalists, known to have existed at least as far back as the time of Solomon, who had himself been a sorcerer. Whereas the Speculative Kabbalists were well-known to be harmless mystics and holy men, the Practical Kabbalists were given over to the quest for worldly power, becoming the Grand Masters of illusion, the arch-deceivers.
“Almost immediately upon his arrival, he imparted his mystical knowledge to the scholarly Kalonymus family. When they moved to the Rhineland in 917 c.e. they established what is now commonly referred to as German Kabbalism by some, and Early Hasidism by others. Until the time of Eleazar of Worms, the mystic doctrine transmitted by Aaron ben Samuel had been considered the private property of the Kalonymides. It was Judah he-Hasid (‘the Pious Jew’, died 1217), a member of the Kalonymides family, who directed his pupil Eleazar to reveal the oral and written doctrine to a larger audience.”
Kabbalah: An Introduction
and Illumination for the World Today
In the meantime, a radical change had swept through Europe and the yet more-civilized Islamic world. At the time of Aaron ben Samuel, the Jews were in control of virtually all commerce and banking throughout the Mediterranean, Northern Europe and eastward as far as Pakistan. This was the Golden Age of the Diaspora, when Jews had become privileged in virtually every court as doctors, advisors, financiers, navigators, mapmakers, scribes (lawyers), alchemists and astrologers. Then suddenly, with the start of the Crusades, the Jews were set upon, cast down and slaughtered throughout the Christian parts of the world.
The First Crusade, in 1095, was under the military leadership of Godfrey de Bouillon. After the sack of Jerusalem in 1097, Godfrey, allegedly a Moravingian and Grand Master of the newly-formed (1070 AD) Prieure de Sion, co-founded the Knights Templar, an order of warrior-monks drawn from the ranks of the nobility, for the purpose of protecting pilgrims to the Holy Land.
Conventional history tends to skirt the issue of why the Crusades. The “calls for help” from the Byzantine Empire to fight the Turks have been perhaps overstated. The fortress of Constantinople contained a vast hoard of wealth dating back to Alexander the Great. The Byzantines could well-afford to hire on the Franks as mercenaries. The Church needed to transfer the Frankish Knights’ loyalty from the French king to the Pope, and a Crusade provided the opportunity. While the main Turkish force was arrayed against Byzantium, the Crusaders struck at the exposed Turkish flank – Jerusalem!
There only remained the question of how the Knights would be paid. King Baldwin was appointed Prince of Jerusalem by the Holy See, the Knights Templar became his de-facto government, and they immediately set about fortifying their newly-created kingdom with modern castles built for them by the Masons. Within ten years, the Knights and an affiliated organization, the Hospitallers, were to amass a vast fortune in land, castles and merchant fleets, as well as a banking monopoly that was protected by a special Papal dispensation allowing the Knights to engage in usury.
This is the key to understanding the Crusades: the rise in importance of merchant-banking. We must remember that, at the time, intelligence-gathering was an important function of the traveling merchant class, later called the merchant adventurers, and that the eleventh-century bankers and caravan masters formed the nexus of what was to evolve into our modern intelligence and banking apparatus.
The two functions are inextricable from one another. By either providing or withholding information, they could influence political affairs. And by the setting of rates of exchange, the merchant bankers could either drain a city of its capital, or direct wealth and commerce its way. And thus it was that the merchant bankers – who were primarily Jews, and the upstart Venetians – were rising to challenge the temporal power of the Papacy, and usurp its role as king-maker. Thus both the aristocracy and the Papacy were threatened.
The ensuing call for Holy War was preached across Europe by itinerant monks – such as the Benedictines, St. Bernard and the Cistercians – who could whip the people of the towns they visited into a religious frenzy. To purge Christendom of evil heresy, and to avenge the “Blood of Christ”, the mob would then be allowed into the Jewish quarter. In the murder and rampage that ensued, the Crusader Knights would suddenly appear on the scene as “Lords and Saviors” – and thus whole armies could be marshaled “on-the-fly”. And the occasion also demonstrated to the Jews how, during the Knights’ absence on Crusade, there would be no one to protect them from the next mob, which could be summoned at any time by the Church.
And so, while on their way to the Holy Land, Godfrey and the Knights of the Prieure de Sion had quietly strong-armed their way into the Jewish merchant-banking establishment, and taken over the operation. This was Pope Urban II’s “Rough Wooing” of the Jews. After the first blood-letting, the surviving Jews were kept on as tax-gatherers, banking associates, war financiers, and brokers for converting loot into wealth. And it does make military sense, before marching off to fight the Turks, that one first “put the Jews in their place”.
So it is fair to say that a great portion of the Templar wealth had been stolen from the Jews, or that the Papacy had handed over the Jewish merchant-banking “franchise” to the Knights Templar in payment for their services; but the situation goes still deeper than that. From the captive Jews’ perspective, while the Pope had indeed put a sword to their throats, the Templars helped to bring in new business, in fact, a great deal of new business – and it turned out that St. Bernard the antisemite was also a very talented salesman. This was the beginning of a very strange relationship … for the Knights Templar and the Jews were becoming merchant-banking partners!
The Prieure de Sion, parent organization to the Knights Templar, had actually been established before the First Crusade, and very likely to gather and evaluate Jewish & Islamic esoterica (the location in Languedoc was ideal to this purpose) – as a sort of counter-intelligence operation – and to report directly to the Pope. The Jews had simply become too powerful in Europe, the Holy Roman Empire that had been created by Charlemagne was beginning to break up, and the Papacy was trying to draw the center of power from Paris to Rome. The Franks were to be amalgamated into the Holy Roman Empire, and their power absorbed by the Church.
Thus it was intended that the Knights Templar become an independent body, in order that they be removed from the French king’s authority. At what point the confiscation of the Jewish merchant-banking establishment occurs is merely a question of opportunity. It was done when it could be done. The dates traditionally given for the foundation of the Knights Templar record stages in this accomplishment.
But something else was happening that, in all likelihood, the Papacy had not foreseen. As the Templars began to learn the art of merchant-banking from their Jewish captives, they also began to assimilate the apocryphal and esoteric knowledge of the Jews. The Templars were becoming crypto-Jews themselves! In time, they would be seen as the “bad boys” of Christendom (from the Papal perspective) because of their willingness to deal with heretics.
There was still more at stake. Not only were the Knights stealing the Jewish banking enterprise, the Church was attempting to steal the Jewish mystique. The Crusades were being transformed by Urban II and his successors into a “Christian” attempt at creating a counterfeit Zion, a false fulfillment of the Hebrew Prophecies. The amalgamation of the Franks is a perfect example of this. The Church succeeded with the Franks, but ultimately failed in her enterprise; the next attempt would be made by the Freemasons, the successors to the Knights Templar, in a later age.
Neither was this the first attempt at a counterfeit Zion: Saul of Tarsus had long ago set about doing much the same thing with the early Christians, when he created the Church in the first place.
The other thing to understand is the difference between the Knights Templar and the Hospitallers. The Templars were both a military and a religious order, and they took a vow of chastity. The Hospitallers were not required to do this. And while the Templars were drawn into dealings with first Jews, and later Turks, Arabs, Egyptians and Moors, the Hospitallers remained aloof, thus displaying complete loyalty to their Pope, content to be his pit-bulls on a leash. The Templars were too-quickly becoming independent-minded, as we said, more willing to compromise with heretics. And so, when tending to their own business matters, the Hospitallers tended to align themselves with the Venetians.
So a rift had appeared within Christendom: on the one hand the Hospitallers and the Venetians, and on the other the Templars and the Jews. Urban II had perhaps bitten off more than he could chew. He had acted out of opportunism if not desperation, and he was never in a position to seize the entire Jewish Nation.
The Crusades had not yet ventured into Iberia (Spain) or Poland. The Sephardic Jews still controlled a merchant-banking network that extended from Spain across Africa to Egypt, and from Poland across the Ottoman Empire to Arabia, and from Babylon eastwards almost to China. Sooner or later they would avenge their loss to the Christians. In the meantime, the Knights Templar had acquired the largest portion: they controlled money and trade from the Eastern Mediterranean to Italy and across Western Europe as far as the British Isles. But within this trade-zone, the Venetians and Hospitallers controlled the sea lanes from Cyprus to Rhodes to Malta. This dynamic equilibrium was to last for nearly two centuries.
The Templars also had, from time to time, alternative trade routes (courtesy of their Jewish partners) running through Constantinople, and through Alexandria to Tunis and Sicily. And so they were not entirely at the Venetians’ mercy. But the Templars’ prestige ultimately rested upon their presence in the Holy Land, or at least Cyprus (necessitating the goodwill of the Hospitallers), and a working relationship with their Jewish merchant-bankers. Over time, that working relationship grew to a sort of fondness (if not necessarily for the Sephardim), at least for Jews in general. Oh, did they repent the bloodbath of Godfroi — too late! It was about this time that the Kabbalist works that had been brought to the Kalonymides family by Aaron ben Samuel two centuries earlier began to surface.
The notion that there existed apocryphal books that unlocked the secrets of the Hebrew Prophecies was irresistible to such as the Templars, and also to the Masons, the Hospitallers and the Venetians, the Pope, and all his anointed monarchs of Europe. Of course, the complete Kabbala was known only to the Kalonymides (and also their Sephardic brethren) at the time, while the Templars were shown only tantalizing bits and pieces. Before long, the Jewish servants were becoming the teachers, and the Templars began to quietly accept Jews into their ranks for the purpose of the knowledge and power to be gained. And not only they. The hofjuden were also beginning to rise in various European courts, at the invitation of aristocratic patrons. These are the beginnings of “Christian Kabbalism”.
By degrees, as the apocryphia released by the Kalonymides were “discovered” by Papal spies, the Crusades were transformed – by the Papacy itself – into a campaign against heresy, and the Christian Knights were redirected against brother Christians!
The horrors of the Albegensian Crusade are but the clearest example, the Fourth Crusade another. Following the military setbacks and blunders that were more frequently occurring, the Templar Knights were forced to abandon Jerusalem. Most of them went to southern France, to live among Diaspora Jews and the surviving Cathars, but this upset the balance of power, threatening both the French king and Papacy in Rome. The Hospitallers more fortuitously entrenched themselves on the islands of Cyprus, Rhodes and Malta to await the outcome.
Philippe the Fair, King of France, had his own solution to the problem. Rather than wait for the Jews and Templars to play him off against the Pope, he would seize the Papacy and crush the Templars, behind whom hid the Jews. By murder and intrigue (and most likely with Venetian assistance) he eliminated two popes and placed his puppet Clement V on the Papal Throne. Meanwhile, it appears that Edward I of England surmised Philippe’s intent (with Venetian assistance), and correctly gauged the wind, because in 1301 he expelled the Jews from England and commenced his war against Scotland.
The Jews, if not the Templars, understood that Philippe was at the heart of the affair, and they endeavored to undermine his power by collapsing his currency, and they succeeded in devaluating this by 65%. That event set off civil rioting in Paris, and Philippe was forced to seek refuge in the Paris temple in 1305. That the Templars did not simply throw Philippe to the dogs is evidence that they were either receiving faulty intelligence (the Venetians?) or that they didn’t believe what the Jews were telling them. For whatever reason, it appears that the Knights Templar were increasingly the dupes.
In 1306, Philip the Fair attacked the Jews and expelled them from his kingdom. This was a direct blow to the Templar infrastructure, because without their Jewish partners, the Templars would be unable to maintain their financial empire, especially with the Venetians nipping at their heels. The Templars were caught in a trap. If they defend the Jews, they would be sealing their own fate, aligning themselves with heretics and worse. Up to this point they had refrained from killing fellow Christians, and the latter Crusades had been primarily Venetian and Hospitaller adventures. For the Templars now to draw swords against Christendom would destroy whatever good the Order had accomplished. They had but little choice save stoically face their doom.
What is amazing is that we never see the two events linked. The Masonic accounts of the Templar martyrdom generally overlook the preceding Jewish expulsion, as doJewish historians overlook the subsequent Templar event. Yet the two cannot be separated.
On Friday, 13th of October, 1307, Philippe the Fair suddenly arrested all of the Knights Templar in his realm that he could lay hands upon, put them to the torture, and extracted confessions of heresy and worse. They were then handed over to the Inquisition of Pope Clement V, which upheld the convictions and had the Knights burned at the stake. Jaques DeMolay, then Grand Master of the Prieure de Sion, was among the martyrs. To this day, Freemasonry still swears to avenge his death.
The properties confiscated from the Templars were divided by Philip and the Venetians, with the Hospitallers inheriting a substantial portion therefrom, but much appears to have slipped quickly through their fingers. The more successful of the Hospitallers and their families later became prominent Papal and Swiss bankers. The famed Knights of Malta also came from their ranks, and many Jesuits. It appears that Christopher Columbus had been a Knight Hospitaller who was married, as we shall see, to the daughter of a Grand Master of the Knights of Christ, one of the Templars’ successors.
Some of the surviving Knights Templar had escaped to Argyll in Scotland, where they received protection from their allies, the Masons; this was the beginning of the “Accepted” rites of Freemasonry, the admission of non-stonemasons into the Masonic lodges. Others fled to Portugal and Spain, and still others to Germany and Poland. Many of these resumed their ties with Diaspora Jewery, and thus remained in contact with Kabbalistic teachings, which were now taking root in fertile soil .
Shortly after the Templar expulsions, as we mentioned, another order of Christian Kabbalists, the Rosicrucians, began to emerge among the aristocracy in Central Europe. This is sometimes referred to as The Order of Strict Observance, which claimed a Templar heritage, and was a forerunner to the Illuminati. They continued the search for hidden knowledge, intent on unlocking the secrets of the Kabbalah, parts of which were still missing from their hands. Interestingly, there was an active Jewish presence in Poland, Austria, Hungary, Provence, the Palatine and the Papal States at the same time, reflected in the rise of the hofjuden, or court-Jews in these same countries.
As the Protestant Reformation began to sweep across northern Europe in the 16th century, the Sephardic Jews and conversos were allowed back into the Protestant kingdoms, notably Holland, Denmark, Germany and the Hague. In France, the Houses of Guise and Lorraine remained outwardly Roman Catholic, but they had secretly embraced Rosicrucianism and were conspiring to capture the French throne. The Sephardic bankers quickly reestablished themselves as the most prominent merchant-financiers in Northern Europe; and this facilitated the infiltration of Jewish Kabbalists into the expanding Rosicrucian societies.
John Dee, Robert Fludd and others brought the Rosicrucian teachings to England during the reign of Elizabeth and, following the defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588, Jewish and Flemish mercers began to appear in more frequent numbers among the merchant-adventurers of London. By the time James I ascended to the throne, beginning the reign of the House of Stuart, Rosicrucians were firmly entrenched within British Freemasonry, and by 1630 a Rosicrucian college had been established in London.
This is where things get interesting. For some reason, the Sephardic merchant-bankers wanted to unseat the Stuart Dynasty, and they began an economic attack on the English crown from their base in the Netherlands, using the same tactics of currency devaluation that had been used against Philippe the Fair. Try as he may, Charles I was never able to satisfy the Dutch (Sephardim), even though he, too, patronized the Rosicrucians.
As the currency-war intensified, Oliver Cromwell began his civil war, supported by the mercers and merchant-adventurers, and financed by the Dutch Jews. More and more Sephardim began slipping into England from the Netherlands, and these often intermarried with wealthy British merchant families. [Lady Diana Spencer (a.k.a. “Princess” Diana) had such a pedigree, dating back to a Jewish mercer who married into the English noveau-riche, and then purchased a false pedigree and coat-of-arms.]
By the time of the Glorious Revolution that put William, the Duke of Orange, on the throne and led to the establishment of the Bank of England in 1694, Kabbalism and Rosicrucian teaching had become firmly entrenched within Scottish, French, and finally British Freemasonic Lodges. This marked the appearance of the “higher degrees”, sometimes referred to as the Jewish Degrees (cf. John Daniel, Scarlet & the Beast): the formation of the Bank of England consummated this 4-way marriage of British Freemasonry with the Sephardic merchant bankers, the merchant adventurers, and the Rosicrucian Kabbalists.
The world money system (with the exception of the Venetian-Swiss-Papal branch of the Hospitallers) was once again in the hands of the Jews, and the Freemasons were now their silent partners. Henceforth, international Jewry would have it in its power to bring down the entire European economic system, or any part thereof. Needless to say, this gave both the Sephardic bankers and the hofjuden direct access to the various Crowns of Europe, and considerable influence over subsequent policy.
But the memory of Edward I of England, who had expelled the Jews during the Second Crusade, ran deep. The “Secret Chiefs” understood that England would never be large or diverse enough to serve as the staging-ground for Jewish world dominion, as foretold in the Hebrew Prophecies. Nor, for that matter, could any country in Europe:
“The sun of freedom has risen for the Fatherland; for us it is merely a bloody northern light … to the oppressed and downtrodden … to all whom “liberty” has brought calamity … we say: “For us no help has come. Seek it out in far off America.”
Leopold Kompert, Jewish poet
in Osterreiches Zentral-Organ fur Glaubensfreiheit
The spirit of nationalism was also beginning to emerge in Europe by the 17th century, and not only the monarchs and Papacy, but also the common people had demonstrated time and again their willingness to attack the Jews whenever they grew too strong. He-Khabbalot Yahudim needed a place to lay the foundation of Zion, and America was the natural target. The African slave trade, which was just then beginning, offered a splendid opportunity to prepare the ground for the later Jewish Exodus to the United States. It was here in the New World that they could create the kind of milti-racial, multi-ethnic and multi-cultural society in which the Jews best thrived. Here, they could find cover and protection in growing numbers and diversity of population, as indeed they had once before under Islam.
This is not to say that the Jews actually initiated the African slave trade in the New World, although it is interesting to note how the pattern of Sephardic settlement in the Americas exactly parallels the development of the slave trade. Nor is it necessary to argue that the Jews were the originators of the emergent ideals of the “Brotherhood of Man” and “Citizens of the World”, soon to be infused into the Abolitionist ideology. The germs of such ideas had long been nascent within Christianity and Pauline doctrine. It was only necessary that the “Secret Chiefs” perceive how these developments could be harnessed to serve the Jewish interest, and that through quiet financial support, the proponents of such ideals might be channeled in the right direction.
[We now enter the phase of the Illuminati and the Great Awakenings,
Cyrus Scofeld and the subversion of modern Christianity]
“And no marvel for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works”
Rabbi Saul of Tarsus
1 Corinthians 11:14-15.
The key to understanding this is in the Hebrew Prophecies themselves. It is made absolutely clear that the Jews are first to achieve dominion over the nations of the earth, and then Zion will be proclaimed over the whole.
“And the Lord will create upon every dwelling place of mount Zion, and even upon her assemblies, a cloud of smoke by day, and the shining of a flaming fire by night: for upon all the glory shall be a defense.”
King James Version
A defense against what? If this is to be the kingdom of Christ Jesus, what need for a defense, Christian? And yet you teach that Zion is Jesus’ earthly kingdom because this is what your church elders had been taught by Cyrus Scofield, editor of your Bible concordance. He went to great efforts to convince you that Isaiah and Micah’s “mountain of the Lord’s house” is supposed to mean the millennial kingdom of Jesus Christ. That is a lie; his argument is a fraud, yet you can’t see it.
Jesus’ kingdom needs no pillar of fire and smoke to protect it. The word “Zion”, in Hebrew, means “Sepulchre”. Solomon’s Temple was built on Mount Moriah, not on Mount Zion. Mount Zion lies to the south of the Old City, separated by a narrow valley, and to the southwest of the Mount of Olives. Mount Zion is also known as Golgotha – the “Hill of Skulls” – or Calvary.
Zion and Calvary are one and the same. Jesus was crucified on Zion! The Christian confusing of Zion with the Rebuilding of the Second Temple is a mistake, the result of bad geography and/or a metaphorically bizarre Kabbalistic joke. Is the Sepulchure to be the place of Redemption? [Freemasonry!] Was Jesus not crucified on the same spot where Abraham had built an altar to sacrifice his son, Isaac? What is the relationship between Jesus and Zion? Who taught us to use that word? Can you see how we have been deceived by our own Christian churches, taught to worship our doom in the Antichrist?
The text of Isaiah 2:1 clearly states “The word that Isaiah the son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem.” Are you a Jew? Will you be allowed to worship in the Third Temple when it is built? Methinks not!
What was Cyrus Scofield trying to hide from us?
“The Tetragrammaton appears to have its origin in the phrase found in Exodus 3:14, “I am that I am”. Before this it was known as the Shem ha-meforash, the seventy-two syllabled name of God, made up of 216 letters. The source of the Shem ha-meforash, according to tradition, are verses 19-21 of Exodus xiv, each of the three verses containing seventy-two Hebrew letters. The letters of verse 19 were written down in separated form and in correct order; the letters of verse 20, also in separated form, were written down in reverse order, and the letters of verse 21 were written down in correct order. Reading from above down, one obtains seventy-two three-letter names, all of which combine to make one. To these three-lettered names were then added either AL or IH to form the names of the seventy-two angels of Jacob’s ladder.
The type of permutation described above is called Temura, and it is a common Kabbalist device. The three verses of Exodus 14:19-21 that constitute the Shem ha-meforash happen to describe how a pillar of cloud by day and fire by night appeared just prior to Moses’ leading the Hapiru across the Red Sea into the desert. This is a cipher, so that wherever a “pillar of fire by night” or “cloud by day” is mentioned in the Bible, one may substitute the Shem ha-meforash to obtain the proper Kabbalistic interpretation.
The Kabbalists know that the Shem ha-meforash – the Seventy-two Syllabled Name of God, the Seventy-two Angels of Jacob’s Ladder, the seventy-two Sanhedrin – are also the seventy-two proper names of daemons, who are sealed in the Key of Solomon. This Key is used by the Practical Kabbalist to construct talismans by which he may summon, or conjure, these beings. To the Speculative Kabbalist the names represent the seventy-two dominions, principalities, elementals, powers and paths over which he seeks mastery.
Thus, from a Kabbalistic perspective, the verse of Isaiah 4:5 is stating that after the Mountain of Zion has been constructed, the deity shall assign seventy-two daemons – an infernal Sanhedrin, if you will – to watch over Zion and protect it.
And that, my dear reader, is exactly what Cyrus Scofield called the Kingdom of Jesus! That, Christian, is what your ministers taught you is Jesus’ Second Coming! Ye worship ye know not what! And who was Cyrus Scofield? As a young con-artist in Kansas after the Civil War, he met up with John J. Ingalls, an aging Jewish lawyer who had been sent to Atchison by the “Secret Six” some thirty years before to work the Abolitionist cause. Pulling strings both in Kansas and with his compatriots back east, Ingalls assisted Scofield in gaining admission to the Bar, and procured his appointment as Federal Attorney for Kansas. Ingalls and Scofield became partners in a railroad scam which led to Cyrus serving time for criminal forgery. While he was in prison, Scofield began studying the philosophy of John Darby, pioneer of the Plymouth Brethren movement and the “any moment now” rapture doctrine.
Upon his release from prison, Scofield deserted his first wife, Leonteen Carry Scofield, and his two daughters Abigail and Helen, and he took as his mistress a young girl from the St. Louis Flower Mission. He later abandoned her for Helen van Ward, whom he eventually married. Following his Illuminati connections to New York, he settled in at the Lotus Club, which he listed as his residence for the next twenty years. It was here that he presented his ideas for a new Christian Bible concordance, and was taken under the wing of Samuel Untermeier, who later became chairman of the American Jewish Committee, president of the American League of Jewish Patriots, and chairman of the Non-sectarian Anti-Nazi League.
Untermeier introduced Scofield to numerous Zionist and socialist leaders, including Samuel Gompers, Fiorello LaGuardia, Abraham Straus, Bernard Baruch and Jacob Schiff. These were the people who financed Scofield’s research trips to Oxford and arranged the publication and distribution of his concordance.
It is impossible to overstate the influence of Cyrus Scofield on twentieth-century Christian beliefs. The Scofield Bible is the standard reference work in virtually all Christian ministries and divinity schools. It is singularly responsible for the Christian belief that the Hebrew Prophecies describe the kingdom of Jesus’ Second Coming, and not the Zionist vision of a man-made New World Order. And it is precisely because Christians persist in this belief that they remain blind to the reality of Zion. Scofield served as the agent by which the Zionists paralyzed Christianity, while they prepared America for our final conquest.
The Illuminati, as we have seen, were spawned to organize the dialectic counterbalance to the power of Freemasonry, and they had quickly achieved their initial objectives. At the infamous European Freemasonic conference at Wilhelmsbad in 1782, the 23 Supreme Councils swallowed the bait and formally adopted the seven-fold plan put forth by Weishaupt and von Knigge. They had, essentially, betrayed their own people and cast their lot with the Jews. The European Jewish emancipation was launched seven years later with the French Revolution in 1789 – the same year the American Constitution was ratified – and this was completed in 1799 by the Emperor Napoleon.
“Men of genuine learning in Europe were well aware that the French Revolution had been preceded by a long period of intense intellectual agitation, in which the very foundations of civilized society were seriously questioned. Ideas and doctrines advocating the abolition of all religion, the overthrow of all civil governments, the creation of utopian world citizenship and the abolition of private property, were to be found in books, tracts and pamphlets, written often at the risk of provoking the authorities.
“But the main haven for the free expression of such revolutionary ideas on the Continent were certain Masonic lodges, which, departing from the simpler practices of English Freemasonry, had become forums where diverse opinion on morals, religion and politics could be and were freely expressed. This development was a peculiarly French innovation, but it was adopted by numbers of Masonic lodges in many other parts of Europe, particularly Germany. …
“… The ostensible purpose of the Order was to bring universal happiness to the human race. The idea was, in Weishaupt’s words to:
‘ form a durable combination of the most worthy persons, who should work together in removing the obstacles to human happiness, become terrible to the wicked, and give their aid to all the good without distinction, and should by the most powerful means, first fetter, and by fettering, lessen vice; means which at the same time should promote virtue, by rendering the inclination to rectitude, hitherto too feeble, more powerful and engaging. Would not such an association be a blessing to the world?'”
from the Introduction to John Robison’s Proof of a Conspiracy
Here we also see the genesis of the prohibitionist movement, which has ever since been undermining our freedom in the name of “the children”. The “durable combination of the most worthy persons” mentioned above is a reference to the socialist ideas of Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881), a Scottish historian and essayist who had a powerful influence on intellectuals of his time. His argument was that the management of human affairs ought not be entrusted to politicians and the democratic mob, but rather to individuals who are selected for their “intellect and virtue”. In simplest terms, Carlyle advocated an oligarchy of the intelligentsia, or academe, a rule by the intellectual elite.
[This is exactly the fulfillment of the “mountain of the Lord’s house”,
to “issue laws, judge between nations,
and instruct us in the ways of the god of Jacob.”]
These ideas took root in 19th century academe, a period of secularization in the institutions of higher learning, and found their chief exponents in people like Wilhelm Wundt, Horace Kallen, John Dewey and Abraham Flexner. The final fruition of Carlyle’s thesis is in the current Technocrat movement, which holds that institutions of human management have become so complex, only specially-trained “professionals” can be entrusted to make decisions. Returning to our source material:
“… That the Order was intended to embrace the entire world was evidenced by Weishaupt’s own definition quoted in the Larousse Grand Dictionnaire published in 1873, in which he said that the goal of the Order was to:
‘unite, by way of one common higher interest and by a lasting bond, men from all parts of the globe, from all social classes and from all religions, despite the diversity of their opinions and passions, to make them love this common interest and bond to the point where, together or alone, they act as one individual.’ …”
“… The ultimate purpose of the Order was kept secret. Only by degrees – going from the lower “Nursery” degrees of Preparation, Novice, Minerval and Illuminatus Minor to the higher “Mysteries” of Priest, Regent, Magus, and Rex – could the initiated learn of the true mysteries and purposes of the Order. And each step of the way was very carefully plotted and planned by Weishaupt and his colleagues, so that the squeamish and gullible never rose higher than the lowest degrees, while the bold, ruthless and cynical, those ready and willing to dispense with religion, morality, patriotism and any other hindrances, rose to the top.
“It was through this process of selection and careful inculcation that Weishaupt, in a mere decade, was able to gather into his Order the cleverest and most diabolical minds in Europe.”
from the Introduction to John Robison’s Proof of a Conspiracy http://www.jurai.net/~gaijin/ill.conproof.html
It must be remembered that almost all institutions of higher learning were denominational in the early 19th century. The university of Chicago was Baptist, Georgetown was Roman Catholic, others were Methodist, Presbyterian or Episcopalian. Even Harvard, the liberal flagship, was officially Unitarian. Again, from the perspective of the Khabbalot Yadudim, a takeover of academe was essential to their purpose. The “mountain of the Lord’s house” was to be an institution of education and law, or regulation and prohibition. Somehow, these institutions had to become Judaicized, and separated from their Christian denominational origins.
From the 19th century perspective, this was viewed as entailing the destruction of all religion. As things turned out, due to the work of people like Cyrus Scofield, Christianity itself had been successfully converted into a tool for Zionism, and the universities were secularized from within. If we look at our churches today, we can see how they universally promulgate the false doctrines of the “brotherhood of man”, “world citizenship”, and the campaign to “make the world safe for the children” at the cost of our nationhood and freedom. These ideas and their ilk will be addressed in a later chapter, The Parable of the Sower. For now it is sufficient to observe that the mainstream religions have been successfully incorporated within academe herself, a complete situation reversal. Returning to our source:
“With the background on French Freemasonry given, Robison then examines the state of Freemasonry in Germany, where the Illuminati aberration originated. He describes the schisms within German Freemasonry, the great fascination with mysteries, the widespread influence of deism – the philosophy that the universe is creating God rather than the reverse – and such utopian ideas imported from France as Cosmo-politism, or world citizenship, and finally the strong influence of French Masonic practices and doctrines through the Lodge of Lyons, the mother lodge of a segment of Masonry known as the Grand Orient de la France.
“One of the lodges in Germany affiliated with the Lodge of Lyons was the Lodge Theodore of Munich. It was in this lodge – to which Weishaupt belonged – that the Illuminati Order was organized by him as a secret organization within a secret organization. It took a number of years before the existence of this secret society within a secret society came to light. Its revolutionary doctrines were so zealously propagated that it couldn’t be completely hidden for very long. In 1783, a Bavarian Court of Enquiry began its investigation of the Illuminati Order. Much of what we know today about Weishaupt’s secret conspiracy is a result of this investigation.
“The second chapter of Robison’s book, undoubtedly the most fascinating, is devoted to reviewing the evidence uncovered by the authorities, and it is here that we discover that Weishaupt’s entire program and methodology was virtually identical with what was later to become known as Communism.
“In the third chapter of the book, entitled The German Union, Robison attempts to reveal how after the Bavarian Court of Enquiry exposed and banned the Illuminati Order and its leaders, the Order went underground and emerged as a network of Reading Societies throughout Germany. The goal of this literary network was to monopolize the writing, publication, reviewing and distribution of all literature, more effectively to control the minds of the readers. In this chapter, one sees more clearly than ever how the conspiracy used the printed word as its ultimate weapon in subverting the minds of the people.
“The fourth chapter of the book demonstrates how all of the foregoing worked to culminate in the horror of the French Revolution, in which Illuminati doctrine and methodology provided the necessary engines of destruction and how members of the Order became the motormen. The pitiful role played by the Duc d’Orleans, the Grand Master of the Grand Orient de la France, reveals the incredible cleverness and deceit with which the conspirators were able to use one royal dupe and his fortune to destroy the monarchy as well as himself …”
“… It is obvious that this conspiracy, appealing to the conceit of half-baked intellectuals, would attract educators, writers, philosophers, publishers, and clergymen. Their counterparts who run America today – like the Galbraiths, the Rostows, the Kennans, the Bundys, the Littells, the Lippmanns – have the same self-conceit, the same arrogance which seems to characterize the overly bright and overly sadistic in any age and any civilization.”
“But the Illuminati offered an even more attractive inducement than its long-range goal: it offered immediate and assured success. For, through its connections and intrigues, the conspiracy was able to place its selected members in positions of influence and power where they could enjoy all the glories of worldly success, provided they used that success to work unceasingly for the advancement of the Order. As Weishaupt explains, once the candidate has achieved the exalted degree of Illuminatus Minor, his superiors:
‘will assist him in bringing his talents into action, and will place him in situations most favorable for their exertion, so that he may be assured of success’.”
from the introduction to Robison’s classic, first published in 1798.
Authorship of the introduction is attributed to “The Publishers”.
Edition is the Americanist Classics Edition (Boston: Western Islands, 1967).
One tends to think of professors, philosophers, and writers as sitting in their ivory towers, perfectly harmless to the world. Robison and history prove otherwise. Activist scholars and professors like Karl Marx and Weishaupt have had a profound influence in shaping the kind of irrational world we live in. From Woodrow Wilson – himself a professor – to Lyndon Johnson, we have had nothing but Presidents surrounded by professors and scholars, who seem to owe their allegiance to one idea only – that of world government. All of which brings to mind Weishaupt’s plan to surround the ruling authorities with members of his Order. He writes:
“These powers are despots, when they do not conduct themselves by its [the Order’s] principles; and it is therefore our duty to surround them with its members, so that the profane may have no access to them. Thus we are able most powerfully to promote its interests. If any person is more disposed to listen to Princes than to the Order, he is not fit for it, and must rise no higher. We must do our utmost to procure the advancement of Illuminati into all important civil offices.”
“Did the Illuminati Order survive beyond its exposure by the Bavarian authorities in 1783? Robison is convinced that it did, and that it was still quite alive and kicking and as dangerous as ever when his book was published in 1798. Between that year and the emergence of the Communist movement in 1848, there is a considerable knowledge gap, which, as far as we know, historians have made no attempt to bridge. However, the nature of the Order would lead one to believe that it was quite capable of surviving the most glaring exposure. Such exposure would hardly have frightened away the hard core who knew exactly what they were after.
“In the realm of ideology, certainly the line from the Illuminati Order to the Communist Manifesto is straight and unbroken, although modified to suit the new conditions of the Industrial Revolution. Weishaupt, it is interesting to note, lived until 1822; moreover, the Catholic Encyclopedia tells us that he finally repented and returned to the Church. Whether he was sincere or not, we shall never know.
“The publication of both Robison’s and Barruel’s works caused a sensation at the time and proved to have a strong influence on public opinion for the few years they were in circulation. The first printing of Proofs of a Conspiracy was exhausted in a few days, and several editions followed. Both works were also quickly published in the United States where they had an immediate and widespread impact. Jacobin ideas and influences had already been noted with alarm in the New World and it was known that the Illuminati had established some lodges in the United States. That the Illuminati would attempt to gain control of the press and publishing industry in this country goes without saying. It was, after all, the hallmark of their method.”
from the introduction to Robison’s classic, first published in 1798.
Authorship of the introduction is attributed to “”The Publishers””.
Edition is the Americanist Classics Edition (Boston: Western Islands, 1967).
Of course, Robison’s book was a product of the late-18th century, and the above quotations, though written much later, were written from the perspective of Robison’s work. While most of the elements of the Unified Conspiracy Theory are present, including the future role of academe, Barruel was not in a position to appreciate the full power latent in the Hebrew Prophecies themselves – of their esoteric and self-fulfilling nature.
In 1798, the idea that the Jews were capable of rising up from their ghettoes and, within one hundred and twenty years, conquering England, Russia, the United States and Western Europe appeared ludicrous. As a result of this under-estimation, the classical conspiracy theorists tend to focus on the Illuminati and stop there, missing the final and most critical element, the wellspring of Illuminism itself.
The full Unified Conspiracy Theory is indeed a very difficult concept to master, because the subject is inherently mystic and esoteric; it is hard to believe that such power really does exist, or that mere words might destroy whole nations. We are dealing with a force that reaches beyond the mind of man, something that is both man-made and other-worldly. One so easily falls into the habit of Jew-baiting: simplifying things, saying how “the Jews” did this and “the Jews” did that – that we forget “the Jews were its putty as well as its molders”, and we slip into cheap anti-semitism.
We tend to overlook this most critical distinction: that the Jews did not choose He Khabbalot Yahudim to be their masters; it was He Khabbalot who chose the Jews to be its carriers:
They shall inherit the land for ever;
The branch of My planting, the work of My hands,
Wherein I glory.
The smallest shall become a thousand,
And the least a mighty nation;
I the Lord will hasten it in its time.
According to the Masoretic Text
Thus the Unified Conspiracy Theory, once we have made reservations and acknowledge that we may never account for every tooth and claw, gains credibility. At least we can agree that something is there, and recognize its alien and predatory nature. The famous English author, Nesta Webster, in her book, World Revolution, p78, in the 1920’s said:
“Whilst these events (the early stages of the French Revolution of 1789) were taking place in Europe, the New World (speaking of America) had been Illuminized. As early as 1786 a lodge of the Order (of the Illuminati) had been started in Virginia, and this was followed by fourteen others in different cities.”
It is the nature of this Beast to infiltrate and corrupt existing organizations, wherever it finds them. The force is inherently parasitic. Dr. Joseph Willard, the President of Harvard University, on July 4, 1812 said to the graduating class:
“There is sufficient evidence that a number of societies of the Illuminati have been established in this land. They are doubtless striving to secretly undermine all our ancient institutions, civil and sacred. These societies are clearly leagued with those of the same order in Europe … We live in an alarming period. The Enemies of all order are seeking our ruin. Should infidelity generally prevail, our independence would fall, of course. Our republican government would be annihilated.”
Nesta Webster, in her Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, quotes Disraeli as saying in the House of Commons, July 14, 1856:
“There is in Italy a power which we seldom mention in this House … I mean the secret societies … It is useless to deny, because it is impossible to conceal, that a great part of Europe – the whole of Italy and France and a great portion of Germany, to say nothing of other countries – is covered with a network of these secret societies, just as the superficies of the earth is now being covered with railroads. They do not want constitutional government; they do not want ameliorated institutions … they want to change the tenure of land, to drive out the present owners of the soil and to put an end to ecclesiastical establishments. Some of them may go further …”
Of course Disraeli, being one of them, is by nature a deceiver, and will employ the sleight of hand even when such is not necessary. He would naturally point his finger the other way. Woodrow Wilson is quoted as having said this:
“There is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”
If I understand him correctly, he is saying, “Don’t blame me. You can’t expect me fight it. Nobody can.” The Prime Minister of England, Sir Winston Churchill, in 1920, three years after the Bolsheviks seized Russia:
“From the days of Spartacus/Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, to those of Trotsky, Bela-Kuhn, Rosa Luxembourg and Emma Goldman, this world-wide conspiracy … has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definitely recognizable role in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads, and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”
: “A conspiracy may be a continuing one; actors may drop out, and others drop in; the details of operation may change from time to time; the members need not know each other or the part played by others; a member need not know all the details of the plan or the operations; he must, however, know the purpose of the conspiracy and agree to become a party to effectuate that purpose [i.e. Zionism, ed.].””
Craig v. U.S., C.C.A.Cal., 81 F.2d 816, 822
Black’s Law Dictionary
: The evidence is sufficient for indictment. What we are speaking about is a conspiracy for world power, to betray nations into bondage, to deprive peoples of their homelands and amalgamate the races of mankind into a mindless, cultureless global proletariat. We are to become the dispossessed “aliens” who toil in the fields to serve our lords and masters.
: That “The Great Work” is attending – in the role of physician or midwife – to the millennial birth of a “New Age”, the “Aeon of Horus”; that it encompasses the full spectrum of beliefs from Transcendentalism (man is God) to the science of human husbandry (man is material), dialectical extremes that revolve about the question, “Does Man have a soul?” He-Khabbalot is the driving force behind the global effort to manipulate humanity to fit into a perfect terrestial mold.
: There is a transcendental aspect to the existence of the “Secret Chiefs”. Aleister Crowley spent the greater part of his life trying to establish that there does exist preterhuman intelligence of a higher dimension (i.e. beyond the Abyss) that may be summoned and which will communicate. Crowley swears that he did just that, and yet he does not betray the identity of the “Secret Chiefs”, the critical element in his proof next to Aiwass itself.
 The effects of this are difficult to understand without an underlying knowledge of Kabbalah. The reader is left to investigate this subject on his own. It does not suffice to say that the Kabbalah is merely a technical manual on religion. There is also the element of a transcendent intelligence.
Source you, ye perverted in heart, who are watchful to obtain an accurate knowledge of evil, and to discover terrors. No one shall assist you.”